Axar Patel celebrates with teammates after taking the wicket of Zimbabwe’s Tadiwanashe Marumani during ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 cricket match between India and Zimbabwe, at the MA Chidambaram Stadium, in Chennai. (PTI Photo)

TimesofIndia.com in Chennai: It took them five matches but India’s batting finally clicked and registered the second-highest total in T20 World Cup history. The Men in Blue fired on all cylinders to end their innings at 256/4 and later completed the formalities by restricting Zimbabwe to 184/6 in their must-win Super Eight clash of the multi-nation tournament in Chennai. From the strong powerplay to intent in the middle overs and a blockbuster finish—back-to-back sixes by Hardik Pandya—India checked the boxes they were yearning to in the fixtures preceding Thursday’s clash. Restoring the right-left combination at the top of the order worked wonders for the defending champions.

Sanju Samson’s return to the Playing XI forced the opposition to keep the off-spin—their nemesis in the last few games—away. When it was finally introduced, runs were already on the board and Abhishek Sharma was back to six-hitting ways.Chepauk was in for a treat as the Indian batters feasted on one of the tournament’s most batting-friendly surface, aided by some ordinary captaincy and bowling. The dot-ball percentage – just 26 — was significantly down in comparison to previous games and all of them operated at a strike-rate of over 150 with three of them hovering in the 200s. There were plenty of sixes, but what was heartening to see was the intent to sustain momentum throughout the innings.Samson was out after a breezy cameo but Ishan Kishan didn’t allow the innings to drop a gear. Suryakumar Yadav toyed with the bowlers and field positions. Hardik Pandya took his initial time but hit top gear when it mattered and the biggest positive was Tilak Varma’s return to fluent form. Batting at No.6, the left-hander, who had been facing criticism for lacking intent in the middle-overs came like a breath of fresh air by taking off from the word go. The left-hander perfected the finishing act, smashing a 16-ball 44 that included 3 boundaries and 4 sixes.India benefitted from their brightest opening stand in the tournament but unlike their best powerplay outing (86/1 vs Namibia), there was no middle-overs choke. Even when off-spinners Sikandar Raza and Brian Bennett bowled in tandem after the field restrictions were lifted, Ishan Kishan and Abhishek Sharma kept the scoring rate healthy and showed no desperation to slog their way out of trouble. The shot selection was good, the scoring areas were intelligent, and India negated the off-spin threat quite convincingly. Raza did pick the wicket of Kishan to break an ominous-looking 72-run stand, but five collective overs of off-spin went for 45, allowing the defending champions to seize control of the middle-overs.Abhishek is always the crucial piece in India’s batting puzzle and the Super 8 clash was another reminder of why life is comfortable when he gets going. It took the youngster a while to score his maiden T20I World Cup fifty but India wouldn’t be complaining as his return to form augurs well for the side in the business, and must-win end of the tournament. There is no room for another slip-up if they are to become the only side to first defend the title, and then win an edition at home. The afternoon assist from South Africa has put the Men in Blue nicely in a good scoring position and the finishing act is now upto them. The batters roared and the bowling unit’s collective might was again on exhibition in front of a capacity crowd. Arshdeep Singh and Hardik kept it tight with the new ball and when Jasprit Bumrah was introduced in the fifth over of the chase, Zimbabwe looked edgy about making a move. With little assistance for the bowlers, India bowled in tight channels. Vice-captain Axar Patel, returning to the XI after two games, drew first blood in his first over by dismissing Tadiwanashe Marumani. However, Zimbabwe threw some punches during a period of play with Brian Bennett.The right-handed opener enjoyed attacking the bowlers on and used the slog-sweep effectively to clear the ropes multiple times. Shivam Dube leaked runs – going for 46 runs in two overs – but the mountain was too high to climb, even after the giant strides in the middle-overs. India still had two overs from Arshdeep, one from Bumrah, and two from Hardik to seal the deal, and the experienced trio followed the expected script.The unchaseable 113 runs were needed off the last 24 deliveries and Arshdeep’s double-wicket over brought the hosts closer to sealing the formalities. Bennett put on a real show with the bat to test the bowlers but even his blinder could only push the total to 184/6. With this emphatic win, India not only kept their campaign alive but also regained their mojo before another must-win clash against the West Indies at Eden Gardens.Brief scores:India 256/4 in 20 overs (Abhishek Sharma 55, Hardik Pandya 50 not out; Sikandar Raza 1-29, Tinotenda Maposa 1-40)Zimbabwe 164/6 in 20 overs (Brian Bennett 99; Arshdeep Singh 3-24)

Conor Benn‘s next fight has been officially announced.

Benn caused shockwaves last week when it was announced he had joined forces with Dana White and Zuffa Boxing, bringing his decade-long relationship with Eddie Hearn’s Matchroom Boxing to an end.

Matchroom had promoted Benn since his debut in 2016, going through plenty of trials and tribulations together, notably a two-year battle after a failed drugs test, and a pair of memorable fights with bitter rival Chris Eubank Jr in 2025.

The nature of Benn’s departure from Matchroom was met with criticism by a number of figures, who have sympathised with Hearn over the split, but ‘The Destroyer’ will now look to immediately put that behind him after his return to the ring was confirmed.

As reported by Netflix, Benn will fight former world champion Regis Prograis on the Tyson Fury vs. Arslanbek Makhmudov card at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium on April 11.

“OFFICIAL: Conor Benn will headline the co-main event of the Tyson Fury vs. Arslanbek Makhmudov card — taking on Regis Prograis #FuryMakhmudov FURY vs. MAKHMUDOV Saturday April 11 LIVE only on Netflix.”

Prograis was previously world champion at 140lbs, but has suffered defeats to Devin Haney and Jack Catterall in recent years, though did claim a win over Joseph Diaz last August.

The main event sees Fury return to action for the first time since his defeat to Oleksandr Usyk in December 2024, as he looks to secure a win against Makhmudov and restart his quest to becoming a three-time world heavyweight champion.

The card at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium will now be bolstered by the addition of Benn, who returns to the scene of his previous two fights against Eubank Jr, with it reported that he will be receiving a $15 million purse for the clash against Prograis.

In two months, Mike Tyson and Floyd Mayweather Jr will meet in an unconventional exhibition bout in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Ahead of the clash, recently retired pound-for-pound star Terence Crawford has admitted he sees only one possible winner.

With Floyd Mayweather’s professional comeback on the horizon, many fans are intrigued to see how the undefeated 49-year-old will look in his ring return against the once ‘Baddest Man on the Planet’.

Whilst Mayweather has been officially inactive for almost 11 years as a professional, ‘TBE’ has kept himself in shape through the use of many lucrative exhibition contests, this being his ninth non-sanctioned appearance since hanging up the gloves.

Meanwhile, ‘Iron’ Mike Tyson retired from the sport after defeat to Kevin McBride in 2005, but he made a controversial return in November 2024, when he was outboxed by YouTuber-turned-boxer Jake Paul, suffering a seventh professional defeat.

Now, despite Mayweather having reigned as a super-featherweight world champion and Mike Tyson spending his entire career at heavyweight, the two are set to meet in Kinshasa — the site of the iconic “Rumble in the Jungle,” where Muhammad Ali knocked out George Foreman.

Speaking on ‘The Joe Rogan Experience‘ podcast ahead of the fight, five-division world champion Crawford revealed that, despite his physical disadvantages, he is expecting Mayweather to dominate proceedings, due to Tyson’s performance against Paul.

“He [Mike Tyson] is not going to land a fist on [Mayweather], not after his last performance.”

Mayweather-Tyson takes place on Saturday, April 25, with no official broadcaster or undercard confirmed for the event as of yet.

The South American swing remains one of the most passionate stops on the ATP calendar, but for Stefanos Tsitsipas, the decision to stay away has come down to finances.

Speaking in an interview with CLAY, Tsitsipas admitted that financial incentives have played a decisive role in shaping his February schedule.

“South America has never offered me a deal good enough to seriously consider it. The Middle East has always been much better in terms of appearance fees,” he said.

The two-time Grand Slam finalist explained that while he appreciates the energy and love for tennis in the region, the difference in financial backing between tournaments makes it difficult to prioritise those events.

“There’s that passion in South America that I sometimes set aside, but when the financial gap is large, you really have no choice but to go with what backs your career,” he added.

Meanwhile, Matteo Berrettini believes the region deserves greater recognition at the top level of the sport. Having competed in Buenos Aires, Rio and Santiago this season, Berrettini called for a premier ATP event in South America.

“Personally, I think South America deserves to have a top-level tournament on the tour,” he said. “People here are passionate about the sport, and there are top players as well.”

With the ATP planning a new Masters 1000 event in Saudi Arabia from 2028, concerns remain that financial power could shift player priorities even further away from traditional stops like South America.

Daniil Medvedev has suggested a major rethink of the ATP Tour structure, arguing that the current system pushes players to compete more than they should.

Medvedev proposed a streamlined calendar built around the biggest events.

“Make it four Grand Slams … 11 Masters. The others, maybe make them without points.”

He believes ranking points from smaller tournaments often force players into decisions that prioritise standings over health.

“That’s the only way to make the tour shorter. It’s never going to happen because there are licenses, and the ATP won’t have enough money to buy all of them.”

He pointed to the example of Holger Rune, who suffered an Achilles injury while competing in an ATP 250 event last year.

“Everybody was like ‘Yeah, but you don’t have to play it’, but if he wants to be in Turin, he has to, even if it’s not a mandatory tournament.”

Medvedev admitted he has felt the same pressure.

“Last year I played seven tournaments in a row. Did I have to? No. I played bad at the beginning of the year, maybe I can get 100 points here, 200 here. If there would be no points, it’s an easier decision.”

He acknowledged that such changes are unlikely.

“The other tournaments won’t say, ‘OK, we’re out’ because they would lose money. It’s business. Right now with how the ATP Tour is, it’s never going to change, at least while I’m playing.”

For Medvedev, the issue is not willingness to compete. It is the structure that makes rest difficult when rankings are always at stake.

Twenty-four hours of UEFA Champions League play-off second legs can do strange things to a football fan’s nervous system. Across 24 and 25 February 2026, the new knockout phase play-offs delivered exactly what they promised: jeopardy for the giants, a platform for disruptors, and eight ties that ranged from serene to seismic.

Former finalists Borussia Dortmund and Juventus were among the biggest casualties. Meanwhile, heavyweights such as Real Madrid, Paris Saint-Germain, and Atlético de Madrid survived stern examinations. And then there was Bodø/Glimt, who did not just qualify, they announced themselves.

Here is how the chaos unfolded.

The Results at a Glance

Atlético Madrid 4-1 Club Brugge (7-4 agg)

Newcastle 3-2 Qarabağ (9-3 agg)

Bayer Leverkusen 0-0 Olympiacos (2-0 agg)

Inter 1-2 Bodø/Glimt (2-5 agg)

Atalanta 4-1 Borussia Dortmund (4-3 agg)

Juventus 3-2 Galatasaray (5-7 agg, aet)

PSG 2-2 Monaco (5-4 agg)

Real Madrid 2-1 Benfica (3-1 agg) 

Newcastle’s Goal Avalanche

Newcastle United effectively ended their tie in the first leg, but even with a 6-1 cushion against Qarabağ FK, they kept attacking. Early goals from Sandro Tonali and Joelinton settled nerves before Sven Botman’s header restored calm after a brief Qarabağ rally.

Nine goals across two legs tells its own story. It was not flawless, but it was emphatic.

Leverkusen’s Professional Job

If Newcastle were fireworks, Bayer Leverkusen were cold efficiency. A 0-0 second leg against Olympiacos protected their 2-0 first-leg advantage.

Heavyweights Who Managed the Storm 

Atlético’s Firepower When It Mattered

After a wild 3-3 first leg, Atlético turned the return into an Alexander Sørloth showcase. His hat-trick powered a 4-1 win over Club Brugge, sealing a 7-4 aggregate triumph.

It was not entirely comfortable, but when Atlético needed authority, they found it.

Real Madrid’s Familiar Authority

Benfica briefly rattled the Bernabéu through Rafa Silva, but Madrid responded with composure. Aurélien Tchouaméni’s equaliser restored control before Vinícius Júnior finished the job in a 2-1 win on the night, 3-1 on aggregate.

Madrid did not dazzle. They imposed. There is a difference, and it is why they endure.

PSG survive the derby

A European derby against AS Monaco was never going to be routine. PSG advanced 5-4 on aggregate after a 2-2 draw in Paris, aided by another Monaco red card across the two legs.

It was tense, emotional, occasionally messy, but PSG’s title defence remains intact.

Teams That Struggled, and Fell 

Juventus: The Comeback That Wasn’t

Few nights capture football’s cruelty like Juventus’ 3-2 win over Galatasaray. Down 5-2 from the first leg, Juve forced extra time despite playing with 10 men for much of the match.

At 5-5 on aggregate, belief was roaring. Then extra time struck back. Victor Osimhen and Barış Yılmaz delivered the decisive blows, ending Juve’s campaign 7-5 on aggregate.

They won the night. They lost the tie.

Dortmund’s Collapse in Bergamo

Carrying a two-goal lead into Italy, Dortmund seemed safe. But Atalanta turned the tie into a storm. Gianluca Scamacca’s early strike ignited belief, and momentum never truly settled.

Karim Adeyemi’s equaliser appeared to force extra time, only for a stoppage-time penalty, converted by Lazar Samardžić after a red card to Ramy Bensebaini, to complete a 4-3 aggregate comeback.

The Outperformers 

Bodø/Glimt: No Fairy Tale, Just Quality

Every Champions League season has one result that demands a second look. Bodø/Glimt eliminating Inter Milan 5-2 on aggregate is that result.

After a 3-1 home win, they travelled to San Siro and won again, 2-1. Jens Petter Hauge and Håkon Evjen struck early; Inter never truly regained control.

This was not a smash-and-grab. It was sustained superiority. Over two legs, they scored five against last season’s finalists and looked tactically fearless doing it.

Who Crashed Out Unexpectedly?

Borussia Dortmund – surrendered a two-goal first-leg lead.

Juventus – forced extra time with 10 men, only to fall.

Inter – last year’s finalists, beaten convincingly.

Club Brugge and Olympiacos – competitive, but ultimately overpowered.

The format promised a trapdoor for complacency. It delivered.

What It All Sets Up

With the play-offs complete, eight more teams join the seeded top eight in the Round of 16. The draw takes place in Nyon on Friday, 27 February 2026 (12:00 CET), and each play-off winner already knows their two possible opponents.

If the play-offs were this volatile, the next phase promises something even more dangerous: familiarity mixed with unfinished business.

And in this competition, that combination rarely ends quietly.

Once the dust settles – whenever it is done drifting, and wherever it ultimately lies – this week may be regarded as one of the most fascinating in boxing history.

It began with the stunning news of Conor Benn’s split from Eddie Hearn, as the British boxer joined rival promoter Dana White, and it has taken in reports of a $1bn court case.

Matchroom chief Hearn has said he expects the signing of Benn, by White’s new entity Zuffa Boxing, to be a mere, singular chess move in what may be a decade-long promotional feud. Yet that feud may not be a simple 1 vs 1, after Wednesday’s report that Hearn’s fellow promoter Frank Warren is claiming $1bn in lost income from Zuffa Boxing’s owners.

Saudi official Turki Alalshikh brought Hearn and Warren together over the last couple of years, despite the Britons’ longstanding grudge, as the trio worked on numerous high-profile events; now Hearn and Warren may need to band together to thwart what Alalshikh is building, given he is working with White at Zuffa Boxing.

This has been a complex saga already, and within it, there is a feeling that boxing civil war has broken out. Here’s what has happened so far, why, and what could come next…

A betrayal by Conor Benn?

On Friday night, Zuffa Boxing’s X account shared a post announcing Benn’s signing. It was scarcely believable. The account carries a blue tick – not gold – so there was some reason to question the post’s legitimacy. Even after that, the images of Benn and White together just looked… wrong, somehow, as if they could be AI. Of course this wasn’t the case, but it’s a testament to the surreality of the moment. And so The Independent approached Benn and his manager for comment, as well as sending other relevant parties the “is this real??” text. At least one figure had been caught off guard.

The main reason the news was so shocking was Benn’s relationship with Hearn; Matchroom had stuck by Benn during a three-year saga in which he couldn’t box on home soil after failing two drug tests. Hearn claimed he had even lent Benn “hundreds of thousands of pounds” during that time, in which the welterweight said he was as mentally low as someone could be.

open image in gallery

Advertisement

Furthermore, Hearn claimed Benn wouldn’t even afford him a phone call to discuss the Zuffa move. “I made a mistake, because I misjudged the character,” Hearn told iFL TV late on Friday, the devastation and regret clear in his voice. “I’m not gonna hang him out to dry […] but when I received the email from his lawyer, I texted him and said: ‘For everything I’ve done for you, I think I deserve a call.’ And he said ‘no’, and I was like: ‘Man… f***… I can’t believe it.’”

What’s more, Benn joined White just days after the American launched a scathing tirade at Hearn, who soon fired back.

Enjoy 185+ fights a year on DAZN, the Global Home of Boxing

Never miss a fight from top promoters. Watch on your devices anywhere, anytime.

Advertisement

Buy Now

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

Enjoy 185+ fights a year on DAZN, the Global Home of Boxing

Never miss a fight from top promoters. Watch on your devices anywhere, anytime.

Buy Now

ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

Advertisement

Benn, 29, said he hopes he and Hearn can continue working together in some way, which truthfully sounded naive. Yet Benn may soon be a free agent again, with one executive confirming that Benn’s deal only includes one fight. Sports Illustrated reported that the contract is worth $15m, a number that Shapiro acknowledged but wouldn’t confirm.

Another interesting element is Benn’s long-standing desire to fight for the WBC title, considering Zuffa Boxing intends to move away from the traditional belt system. Even with that in mind, Benn was calling for a shot at new WBC champion Ryan Garcia within two days of joining Zuffa.

Thursday brought a surprise then, in the news that Benn will fight Regis Prograis in April, live on Netflix (on Tyson Fury’s undercard), and at a 150lb catchweight. The Netflix factor means Benn’s sole contracted fight with Zuffa may not even air on the promotion’s main broadcast platform, Paramount+.

open image in gallery

Advertisement

Benn will also fight Prograis in London, despite Zuffa’s essence as an American brand and Benn’s apparent wish to box in the US. And for as much as Benn is reported to be earning regardless, there would have been a tax benefit to competing Stateside. But “it’s worth taking the tax hit to be on the Fury undercard”, argued Oriana Morrison, a sports accountant and tax strategist, while speaking to The Independent. “People are far more likely to watch something with Fury in it than without him. Benn will get that payout in the long run with Zuffa, Netflix, and Fury’s audience’s eyes on him.”

But back to the belts. Zuffa’s second-biggest signing is Jai Opetaia, the IBF cruiserweight champion who is desperate to collect the division’s other major titles. He will fight Brandon Glanton for the new Zuffa cruiserweight belt in March, and it’s unknown whether his IBF strap will be on the line in that contest. Opetaia and Zuffa’s goals don’t seem to align, yet the Australian insisted they do. Still, he fired a warning to Zuffa: “If we don’t get one [unification fight] by the end of the year, I’ll be very f***ing disappointed.”

Reports of a $1bn court case

The next major number to be reported this week was $1bn, as The Telegraph said Warren is claiming that amount in lost income from Zuffa Boxing’s owners: TKO and Sela.

Here, it is worth explaining that TKO is a combat-sports brand – the parent company of WWE and the UFC, the latter of whom’s president is Dana White – and Sela is a Saudi events company. The faces of Zuffa Boxing are White and Alalshikh.

open image in gallery

Per The Telegraph, Warren’s company Queensberry is claiming that TKO and Sela breached contracts they had signed with him, going behind his back to form a partnership of their own. Queensberry is reportedly seeking up to $1bn (£740m) in compensation, for income that the promotion claims it would have earned if the contracts had been honoured. Legal letters have reportedly been sent, and it is thought the case could end up with a formal claim being made in the High Court if there is no resolution.

Queensberry is said to have claimed that, in September 2023, it signed an exclusivity agreement with Sela, giving the Saudi firm access to Queensberry’s insight into boxing. Queensberry is also believed to be claiming it signed a separate contract with TKO, allowing the brand access to Queensberry’s online data, including details of the Sela contract. The Telegraph reported that Warren did not sign any contracts with Alalshikh personally.

The Independent approached Queensberry, TKO and Sela for comment, and a spokesperson for Sela said: “We are disappointed by the unfounded claims brought by Queensberry and Frank Warren. We reject them in their entirety and are confident that the facts will fully vindicate our position.” Meanwhile, Warren told the BBC: “It’s just a difference of opinion over the contracts that we signed, so that will just take its course. I can’t make any comment on it. It is what it is.”

A bizarre response on X

Matters then became even more complicated. Later on Wednesday, the magazine The Ring – owned by Alalshikh – posted a controversial tweet, alleging the circulation of “rumours” about Queensberry’s business affairs. The Independent has approached Queensberry for comment on the post.

What next?

open image in gallery

Last weekend, in the wake of the Benn news, boxing insider Dan Rafael tweeted: “If you think s*** happened today just wait. Ain’t seen nothing yet.” It’s unclear whether he was referring to the then-impending report of Warren’s alleged lawsuit, or whether something else is coming. But what could be bigger right now?

In January, Oleksandr Usyk’s team director Sergey Lapin confirmed they been contacted by Zuffa. Signing the pound-for-pound No 1 would be a huge statement of course, yet Usyk left his longtime promoter Alex Krassyuk last year, and he is late in his career now; while Usyk is the greatest talent that Zuffa could sign, such a move would lack the personal edge that made the Benn switch so captivating.

Should Zuffa sign Fury, that too would be a seismic acquisition from a talent perspective, though the British star is older like Usyk. Still, the end of a partnership with Warren would feel significant.

Perhaps the only signing that would blow up boxing’s corner of the internet would be Anthony Joshua, another of Hearn’s key names – his most-important of all, actually. Although “AJ” and Benn have both spent their entire professional careers with Hearn, the promoter was quick to contrast the British boxers, saying: “You can’t mention those in the same breath, for many reasons. Joshua is a different breed of class and loyalty.”

Hypothetically, if Zuffa were to sign Fury and Joshua and make that long-awaited super-fight – without Warren and Hearn involved – that would constitute genuinely shocking news. Or maybe the next big development won’t pertain to the signing of a boxer, but to something more relevant to the sport’s wider landscape. At this point, it feels fair to say that nothing is impossible. A new era has begun: an era of boxing civil war.

Cody Rhodes began the promotion of Elimination Chamber: Chicago by appearing on live television outside WWE. However, Rhodes made a botch that didn’t go unnoticed.

Stephanie Vaquer is one of the biggest stars in WWE today even though she only joined the company in 2024. Vaquer is the reigning Women’s World Champion and will defend her title against Liv Morgan at WrestleMania 42.

Speaking on ESPN’s Get Up, Cody Rhodes fell victim to La Primera’s surname. The American Nightmare mispronounced Vaquer’s last name, just like other stars such as Nikki Bella, Naomi, Michael Cole and Wade Barrett.

“I mean, we’re officially on the road to WrestleMania. WrestleMania in Las Vegas, which will be the biggest it’s ever been. This one, all the marbles, all the chips. It’s been unpredictable. Right now, we just have Roman Reigns versus (CM) Punk. Liv Morgan versus Stephanie Vaquer (he says Vakor). The big, big, big, big time main event for the other night. It’s up in the air. You’ll see it at the Elimination Chamber,” Rhodes said. [H/T TJR Wrestling]

Watch the video below around the 4:37 mark.

Cody Rhodes will be competing at Elimination Chamber: Chicago. He is set to battle LA Knight, Jey Uso, Trick Williams, Je’Von Evans and Randy Orton for a shot at Drew McIntyre and the Undisputed WWE Championship at WrestleMania 42.

Cody Rhodes opens up about using ‘Raheem’ line on SmackDown

In an interview with Jonathan Hood on Under The Hood, Cody Rhodes finally opened up about his viral promo acknowledging “Raheem” as his nickname or middle name, whichever it is. The meme has been going around social media for years, but it was the first time Rhodes acknowledged it on WWE television.

Rhodes revealed that he was hesitant to use the line before his wife, Brandi Rhodes, encouraged him to use it.

“I had told her that I might say it. I felt bad because I told her and then she said, ‘Oh, you have to say it. It’s funny.’ I didn’t wanna come at Roman or Punk in an adversarial way. I’m not wrestling either of you. You guys are wrestling each other and it’s awesome. I wanted to come at it with a little bit of levity because I knew others were gonna come at it from a different perspective, and I thought that was funny,” Rhodes said. [H/T WrestlingNews.co]

The American Nightmare also didn’t mind some backlash online for embracing the joke since he did some “field testing” beforehand.