Nov 24, 2024; Chicago, Illinois, USA; Minnesota Vikings linebacker Jonathan Greenard (58) celebrates after recording a sack against the Chicago Bears during the second quarter at Soldier Field, reacting with energy as the Vikings defense generated pressure in a key divisional matchup. Mandatory Credit: Daniel Bartel-Imagn Images
On March 3rd, ESPN’s Adam Schefter tweeted that Minnesota Vikings outside linebacker Jonathan Greenard could be made available via trade, and while no deal has materialized, the idea of Greenard’s ticket out of town isn’t dead. In fact, the Greenard trade sweepstakes could involve two teams: the Philadelphia Eagles and the Indianapolis Colts.
Philadelphia and Indianapolis have emerged as the loudest outside suitors.
That’s the word from The Athletic‘s Alec Lewis this week, with the draft five weeks away.
Advertisement
A Look at the Current State of the Greenard Trade Sweepstakes
The Vikings might be best served to keep Greenard, but a sweet deal could change their minds.
A Philadelphia Eagles helmet rests alone on the turf in the quiet moments after Super Bowl LIX on Feb 9, 2025, at Caesars Superdome in New Orleans, symbolizing the aftermath of a hard-fought championship clash with the Kansas City Chiefs and the weight of football’s biggest stage lingering in the stadium air. Mandatory Credit: Geoff Burke-Imagn Images.
Lewis on Greenard Trade Partners
The Greenard trade smoke has billowed for about two weeks. Lewis updated the situation this week, saying on his podcast, “I think over the course of the last week or last two weeks, it probably seemed more imminent than it was. I would say that the Minnesota Vikings have been very clear from the outset that they are doing this on their terms. So they are not going to trade a talented player that they’ve really liked having, Jonathan Greenard, unless it makes a lot of sense for them to do that.”
“I would say the Philadelphia Eagles definitely still need edge rusher talent. I mean, they have Jalyx Hunt, they signed Arnold Ebiketie, they have Nolan Smith Jr., but to have another elite edge rusher, it’s part of the reason they were in on Jaelan Phillips. And then I think the Indianapolis Colts are kind of in a similar vein.”
Advertisement
It’s worth noting that Greenard has been rather silent about the recent process, perhaps adding credence to the trade theory.
The Eagles’ Angle
Hunt, Smith Jr., and Ebiketie — mentioned by Lewis — do not represent a suitable EDGE group for a team that will outwardly profess a Super Bowl-or-bust or stakes in 2026. That trio is actually rather unbecoming for a serious Super Bowl contender.
And with men like Maxx Crosby and Trey Hendrickson off the board, the Eagles are down to nubbins for EDGE help. It’s either the draft, a trade for a player like Greenard, or both.
Advertisement
The Eagles have their 1st-Rounder, a 2nd-Rounder, and three 3rd-Rounders, so PHI general manager Howie Roseman may be thinking two pass rushers or more before the clock hits Round 4. If he swung a deal for Greenard, his life would be easier; EDGE wouldn’t be mandatory in the draft.
Perhaps Roseman can send the 54th overall pick (2nd Round) to Minnesota and call it good.
The Colts’ EDGE Need
While Greenard would be a valuable addition to the Colts, their need for an EDGE rusher isn’t as pressing as it is for some teams.
Advertisement
Indianapolis Colts quarterback Daniel Jones (17) chats with head coach Shane Steichen during the opening quarter on Oct 19, 2025, at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, as the Colts settle into an early-game rhythm against the Los Angeles Chargers in a key regular season matchup. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-Imagn Images
Indianapolis has been quietly assembling a capable group. Rookie Laiatu Latu already shows significant potential as a key player, and Arden Key provides experience as a reliable starter. JT Tuimoloau flashed promise as a rookie, earning a 60.6 Pro Football Focus grade in limited snaps. Michael Clemons, Durell Nchami, and Viliami Fehoko Jr. add further depth, even if the group lacks a true game-changing disruptor.
Greenard would immediately inject energy into this EDGE group and elevate its overall performance.
However, draft capital presents a challenge. After trading its 2026 and 2027 first-round picks to the Jets for Sauce Gardner, Indianapolis’ long-term asset pool has been affected, which must be taken into account.
Here’s what the Colts have to work with in 2026:
2nd Round (No. 47 overall)
3rd Round (No. 78 overall)
4th Round (No. 113 overall)
5th Round (No. 154 overall)
6th Round (No. 214 overall)
7th Round (No. 249 overall)
7th Round (No. 254 overall)
Acquiring Greenard would likely require parting with the 2nd-Round pick, a potential sticking point. Trading it would further commit the Colts to an aggressive roster-building strategy that has already cost them two future 1st-Round selections.
The Draft as a Climax?
Advertisement
Greenard’s trade fodder felt hot and heavy in early March and during the first wave of free agency. Now, the drama has died down a bit. The draft is just five weeks away, and there’s a decent chance that he gets shipped to his new team sometime during the event, when other general managers can weigh the draftboard options in real time versus the prospect of adding Greenard, a veteran with six seasons of experience.
Los Angeles Chargers quarterback Justin Herbert (10) takes off on a run while Minnesota Vikings linebacker Jonathan Greenard (58) closes in during first-half action on Oct 23, 2025, at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California, showcasing a moment of pressure as Herbert tries to extend the play under pursuit. Mandatory Credit: Gary A. Vasquez-Imagn Images
It’s also worth noting that Minnesota would save an extra $6 million on the salary cap this season if it traded Greenard after June 1st. By then, teams will have their pass-rushing situation figured out, but it’s more advantageous to Minnesota’s books to trade Greenard this summer.
Or — the Vikings could just keep him. It’s not the worst idea in the world to keep the best defensive player on the roster … on the roster.
Kaulig Racing CEO Chris Rice addressed the Daniel Dye situation, days after the young driver was indefinitely suspended by both the team and NASCAR. Following Dye’s controversial comments, Rice urged him to learn from the mistake and move forward.
The situation stemmed from a Whatnot livestream in which Dye spoke about Team Penske IndyCar driver David Malukas, while opening card packs. During the stream, the RAM Truck Series driver used an inappropriate tone to mock Malukas, prompting disciplinary action.
Thanks for the submission!
Advertisement
NASCAR penalized him under Section 4.3.C, while Kaulig Racing immediately followed suit. The incident triggered mandatory sensitivity training for Daniel Dye before any potential return. Chris Rice publicly acknowledged both the personal and professional dimensions of the situation.
Advertisement
“First and foremost, Randy (his father, Randy Dye), Daniel, those guys are family to us. And very unfortunate situation that arose this week that we got aware of. There’re protocols and different things that has to happen in NASCAR. We’re in a sport today that we’ve a lot of people that watch us. We’ve a lot of partners that are involved and when that happens, it’s a lot of people you’ve to talk to and figure out what we need to do to move forward.”
Chris Rice pointed to a broader responsibility tied to the sport’s visibility and commercial structure, where teams must balance internal relationships with external expectations. However, he wanted to look ahead.
“One thing about this is that we always learn from our mistakes, including me. I made many, many mistakes over my life, and I probably have not done making mistakes. And we just (get) stronger when we get to the other side of it. So that is the main thing that we have to look at… You look at the NASCAR community and everybody else that we just not, there’s a lot of eyes and ears on us now. A lot of TV cameras, a lot of cameras all around us and we have to really pay attention to what’s going on.”
Daniel Dye, 22, started the 2026 NASCAR Truck Series season with three mid-pack finishes and was 13th in the standings. He made a few starts in the O’Reilly Auto Parts Series before the incident halted his campaign.
Kaulig Racing names AJ Allmendinger as replacement for Daniel Dye at Darlington
Kaulig Racing has already confirmed its short-term solution for the No. 10 RAM Truck. They announced earlier in the week:
“AJ Allmendinger will drive the Kaulig Racing No. 10 Truck Friday at Darlington Raceway.”
AJ Allmendinger competes full-time in the NASCAR Cup Series for Kaulig Racing and now steps into the Truck Series role. He has prior experience across all three national divisions, with his most recent Truck outing coming in 2021. He now pulls double duty at the 1.366-mile track.
Real Madrid are likely to be without injured goalkeeper Thibaut Courtois for both legs of their Champions League quarter-final against Bayern Munich, according to the Spanish press on Thursday. The club said in a statement the Belgian international, who was substituted at half-time in Tuesday’s last 16 tie against Manchester City, had been diagnosed with a muscular injury “to the right quadriceps”.
Real did not specify how long the thigh injury would sideline him but sports daily AS said Courtois, 33, could be out for six weeks, which would cause him to miss the quarter-final matches against Bayern on April 7 and April 15.
His likely replacement is the Ukrainian Andriy Lunin.
(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Augustin Senghor, a Caf executive committee member and former head of the Senegalese Football Federation, told the BBC World Service that Senegal should “fight against injustice” after the continent’s governing body ruled on Tuesday that they had forfeited the final against Morocco having left the the pitch in protest.
The spot-kick was eventually missed after Brahim Diaz’s “Panenka” effort sailed into the arms of Edouard Mendy, with Senegal then winning 1-0 in extra time.
“In a situation like this, we have to fight against injustice,” Senghor said, as reported by the BBC. “Football is fair play, football is played on the field, not in offices. What happened with Caf was unacceptable.
“When you see a committee taking such a decision in violation of our rules, in violation of the Fifa laws of the game, to take the trophy and give it to Morocco, I think it is something very abject. We have to denounce it.”
According to Afcon regulations, if a team “refuses to play or leaves the ground before the regular end of the match without the authorisation of the referee”, they will be deemed the loser and their opponents will automatically be given a 3-0 win, as per Articles 82 and 84.
But the ruling has been met with widespread complaints.
Advertisement
The Senegalese Football Federation (SFF) said it would be taking the matter to the Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport, while the country’s government has called for an “independent international investigation into suspected corruption”.
Head coach Pape Thiaw was later suspended having led his players off the pitch, although only for matches in the next Afcon qualifiers, which start after the World Cup in June, for which both Morocco and Senegal have qualified.
Morocco, as newly-crowned champions, immediately welcomed the decision.
People have been panning Tottenham boss Igor Tudor but they will look upon him in a different light if his side win this game.
Maybe he just needs to identify the opposition’s threat a little bit better than he does opposing managers – that clip of him mistaking someone else for Arne Slot at Anfield last week did make me chuckle.
Nottingham Forest‘s issue is that they don’t score enough goals, and that lack of attacking threat might just cost them here.
I know I keep mentioning it, but Forest manager Vitor Pereira has still not won a Premier League game all season, after 12 attempts with Wolves and Forest.
Advertisement
I don’t think he will win this week, either, although this is going to be an extremely tight game.
Spurs’ first aim will be to avoid any calamities like their red card against Crystal Palace in their previous home league game.
They have a few injuries, but they still have a fair bit of quality in their team.
Tottenham also have a bit of positivity and momentum after Wednesday’s home win over Atletico Madrid, even though it wasn’t enough to turn around their Champions League tie. Now they need to build on that.
Advertisement
Sutton’s prediction: 1-0
Amari’s prediction: If we play like we did against Liverpool and we get some players back from injury too, then we can do this. Forest have got some good players but we just need to get a result, it doesn’t matter how. 3-2
Amari on why he supports Spurs, and his favourite players: It’s down to my dad – every single person on my dad’s side is a Spurs fan. When I was kid, my heroes were Gareth Bale and then Dele Alli – when he first came to us, he was incredible.
Amari on whether Spurs will stay up or not? It’s been such a frustrating time because I don’t know what’s been going wrong. We can say it’s because of injuries but every team has those. We have been missing lots of players, but we still have a good squad.
Advertisement
I’ve been stressed about it before, but I am not stressed about it right now. If we are still in this situation with three games left then it is different, we might be going down. Now? I do believe we can get out of this.
Genesis’ prediction: I am going to give you a strange one here – I think Forest will surprise people. 1-3
Earlier this week, USA golden goal hero Jack Hughes publicly requested that the Hockey Hall of Fame return the puck from his tournament-winning goal at the 2026 Olympics expressing frustration that the historic memento remains in the institution’s possession rather than with his family.
On Wednesday, Sidney Crosby was asked about Hughes’ request and addressed the situation. He shared his own perspective on what happened when his puck from the 2010 Olympic gold medal-winning goal was sent to the Hall of Fame.
“I didn’t even think about it that way, to be honest with you,” Crosby told The Athletic. “I was just happy that I scored the goal. I was happy that the puck was going to the Hall of Fame. I didn’t even think about it that way.”
Advertisement
The Penguins captain’s puck from his overtime winner against Canada remains at the Hockey Hall of Fame and Crosby has not sought to retrieve it.
Jack Hughes had made his feelings clear in an interview with ESPN where he mentioned that the puck remain in the Hall of Fame’s possession.
“I’m trying to get it. Like, that’s bulls— that the Hockey Hall of Fame has it, in my opinion. Why would they have that puck?” Hughes said.
Hughes later explained that his desire to reclaim the puck stems from wanting to give it to his father, Jim Hughes. The 24-year-old center also said Megan Keller, who scored the golden goal for Team USA’s women, should have her puck returned.
Hockey Hall of Fame VP comments on Jack Hughes’ request
Afterwards, vice president and curator for the Hockey Hall of Fame Philip Pritchard addressed Hughes’ comments by outlining the institution’s position on artifact ownership.
Advertisement
Pritchard explained that as a nonprofit registered charity in Canada, the Hall operates under legal protocols for accepted donations. Once items enter the permanent collection, they are insured and preserved according to institutional standards.
“Unfortunately, in the easiest words, it was never Jack’s puck to own,” Pritchard said. “It’s been donated to us now. For every artifact that’s been donated, we have a paper trail and signed paperwork of where it’s come from.”
“We try to take the emotion out of it. We’re here to preserve a game that Jack’s lucky enough to play or we’re lucky enough to work in. That’s why the Hockey Hall of Fame museum exists as an institution: We’re preserving the game of the past, present and the future,” he added.
Hughes has since indicated he will not actively pursue the matter. When recently asked about the puck situation, he said his focus remains on playing hockey and he does not plan to reach out to the Hall of Fame.
What is it like to host 200 women in a three-day, partner golf event, and then do it all again with a new group of 200 a week later?
In short: It’s a lot of work — with plenty of drama in between.
The behind-the-scenes action of the biggest women-only golf tournament in Arizona is the subject of a new, six-episode documentary that launched today on YouTube. “The Making of the Desert Classic” follows tournament founder Tori Totlis and her team as they prepare to stage the 5th annual Desert Classic at Papago Golf Club in Phoenix, Ariz.
Episode 1 introduces viewers to Totlis and her mission: staging a fun yet still competitive multi-day tournament for recreational players. As a former tennis and softball player who didn’t start playing golf until her 20s, Totlis was immediately enamored with the tournament environments she experienced at country club events. Why couldn’t that same experience be offered at the recreational level? In 2022, Totlis decided to do just that, and leaned on her growing social media following to sell out a 200-player tournament in less than a week. The Desert Classic was born.
In addition to golf, Desert Classic participants enjoy a thoughtfully curated experience that includes on-site shopping, daily dress themes, guided pre-round stretching sessions, instructional clinics and nightly parties. The tournament proved so popular that Totlis added a second week with an identical itinerary in 2024, and that field sold out, too.
To celebrate the tournament’s fifth year, Totlis turned to a Phoenix-based all-female production crew from Good Vibe Studios to document the experience.
“When you’re hosting a big tournament like this, you really have to be on the whole time,” Totlis said. “I thought that this series would bring some insight as to what’s going on when we’re not interacting with the players, like how we’re getting through the day. It’s a marathon, it’s four days that are just nonstop 16-hour days, and our team really works 20 hours.
Advertisement
“So I just thought it would be interesting to see how much it really takes to throw this, but also at the same time, how much fun we have doing it,” she continued. “There’s a lot of YouTube series out there, but I just think that this tournament is unique. The age group is unique, with women flying in from all over the country. So I’m excited about it.”
The documentary’s six episodes will drop over the next two weeks, with two new episodes becoming available every Thursday. You can watch Episode 1 below, or visit Totlis’ YouTube page on Thursdays to view new episodes.
Tyson Fury’s father John Fury has claimed that their relationship is “completely destroyed”, with the 60-year-old also dismissing his son’s abilities in a recent interview.
He said as much on Thursday in a bombshell interview with Playbook Boxing, powered by Betway, as he suggested the pair’s relationship was beyond saving.
Tyson Fury (right), pictured with his father John, at a press conference for his latest return to boxing (Getty)
“I think he’s past his best,” John said of his 37-year-old son, a former two-time world heavyweight champion. “I love my son, but there’s too many people patting him on the back and telling him he’s Tarzan, when he’s not Tarzan. He’s been gone, Tyson, since the Deontay Wilder fights.”
Fury climbed off the canvas twice to draw with Wilder in 2018, dominated the American in 2020, then was knocked down again before stopping him for a second time in 2021.
“Makhmudov, this is a problem,” John continued. “I’m the first one to say it, because all them out there, they don’t pay enough attention to details. It’s not what I’d have done.
Advertisement
“I’ve told him 20 times about it, but he’s got his people around him what he thinks are his friends again [sic], but [he’s] easily led. But that’s another matter.”
John further played down Tyson’s current skillset, referencing his back-to-back losses to Oleksandr Usyk in 2024 – Tyson’s most recent fights and the first defeats of his professional career.
While John said he believed Tyson should have been awarded a win in the first fight, he said of the rematch: “I think he let Usyk do it [win it] in the last round.
Enjoy 185+ fights a year on DAZN, the Global Home of Boxing
Advertisement
Never miss a fight from top promoters. Watch on your devices anywhere, anytime.
ADVERTISEMENT. If you sign up to this service we will earn commission. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.
“I watched the Usyk fight last night, power weren’t there. The moves was there, but after six or seven rounds he was fading quick […] There’s no two-phased attacks, there’s nothing, there’s no angles; when there is an angle, it’s laboured. The legs ain’t there.”
Tyson in his second loss to Oleksandr Usyk, a fight he still believes he won (Getty)
John also criticised Tyson’s team for the upcoming Makhmudov fight, saying: “B******s, the lot of it. Same squad, same bulls*** […] He can’t do the blood-and-guts training anymore, so he’s going through the motions with these idiots.
“If you can’t show your father respect when it matters, then just carry on. I don’t need you. He’s taken their word over mine, and that’s eaten me up more than I can explain.
“I felt like strangling Sugar[hill Steward, coach] after [the Usyk rematch]. I wanted him out of my corner. Going in there with a southpaw like that…”
Advertisement
Opening up on his relationship with Tyson specifically, John said: “My relationship with Tyson is destroyed. Boxing destroyed it completely. No, [it can’t be repaired]. It’s his own fault.”
John with Sugarhill Steward in 2022, after Tyson beat Dillian Whyte (Getty)
Speaking on finances, John continued: “I’ll say it on camera: I’ve never taken £10 off him in my life, and I never will. I don’t want Tyson’s money, and I don’t need Tyson’s money.
“Whatever he’s got, good luck to him, but don’t forget who built his story when he was a kid. He didn’t build it himself, did he? Me, his father.”
John became particularly emotional at one point, saying: “I was 30 seconds away from asking for a break there. I haven’t really expressed these emotions before, but they’re strong and they’re there.”
The Independent has approached a representative of Tyson Fury for comment.
India women’s hockey team chief coach Sjoerd Marijne is banking on a mix of overseas tours, competitive exposure and national camps to ready the side for the World Cup and Asian games this year.
The World Cup is scheduled to be held in Belgium and Netherlands in August, while the Asian Games will take place in Japan in September.
The Indian women’s team will compete in the FIH Hockey Nations Cup in Auckland from June 15 to 21. They are also scheduled to tour the United States and Argentina, and play matches against Germany and the Netherlands.
“We have a tour to USA and Argentina, the Nations Cup in New Zealand, and practice matches in Germany. We will also play some matches in the Netherlands,” Marijne said in media release.
Advertisement
“These scheduled games combined with our camps set us up for a very good mix of matches and training to be ready for the World Cup and Asian Games.”
India have been placed in Pool D alongside England, China and South Africa.
China are the top-ranked side in the group at world No. 4, followed by England at No. 6, while India and South Africa are ranked ninth and 19th respectively.
“This is a very competitive and balanced pool. There are teams like England and China that bring different styles and a lot of experience, while South Africa is always unpredictable and dangerous on their day,” Marijne said.
Advertisement
“However, for us, it’s not about the draw – It’s about how we show up. At a World Cup, every match demands your best. We respect all opponents, but our focus is on playing our style of hockey with consistency and courage,” he added.
India finished runners-up in the recently concluded FIH World Cup qualifiers, going down to England in the final.
Despite falling short, there were positives, with India emerging as the second-highest scorers in the tournament with 11 goals, including six from penalty corners.
Having guided India to a historic fourth-place finish at the Tokyo 2020 Olympics, Marijne returned as head coach in January this year.
Advertisement
“We are building something long-term. We want to build a team that is resilient, adaptable, and fearless. Qualifying was the step, but we are aiming for much more. The first steps have been made in the right direction, but there is much more to go if we want to be successful.
The 2026 Valspar Championship continues on Friday, March 20, with the second round at Innisbrook’s Copperhead Course in Palm Harbor, Fla. You can find full Valspar Championship tee times for Friday’s second round at the bottom of this post.
Featured tee time for Round 2
At this week’s Valspar Championship, many eyes will be following Justin Thomas as he makes his way around the Copperhead Course.
Thomas came out of nowhere to contend at TPC Sawgrass, eventually settling for a T8-finish. Now Thomas is hoping to ride that momentum to his 17th career PGA Tour win at the Valspar.
You can watch Friday’s second round of the 2026 Valspar Championship from 2-6 p.m. ET on Golf Channel. PGA Tour Live on ESPN+ will provide exclusive early streaming coverage starting at 7:30 a.m. ET on Friday, in addition to featured group and featured hole coverage.
Check out the complete Round 2 tee times and groupings for the Valspar Championship.
With an ESPN+ subscription, you gain access to PGA Tour Live, where you can stream the best PGA Tour events live from wherever you want.
Advertisement
2026 Valspar Championship tee times for Friday: Round 2 (ET)
Tee No. 1
7:35 a.m. – Austin Eckroat, Doug Ghim, David Lipsky 7:46 a.m. – Rafael Campos, Seamus Power, Rasmus Højgaard 7:57 a.m. – Adam Svensson, Michael Kim, Bud Cauley 8:08 a.m. – Michael Brennan, Stephan Jaeger, Lucas Glover 8:19 a.m. – Adam Schenk, Kevin Yu, Webb Simpson 8:30 a.m. – Garrick Higgo, Taylor Pendrith, Ryo Hisatsune 8:41 a.m. – Brice Garnett, Dylan Wu, Mac Meissner 8:52 a.m. – Nick Dunlap, Rico Hoey, Chandler Blanchet 9:03 a.m. – Zecheng Dou, Jackson Suber, Neal Shipley 9:14 a.m. – Paul Peterson, Paul Waring, Blades Brown 9:25 a.m. – Patrick Fishburn, Isaiah Salinda, Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen 9:36 a.m. – Alejandro Tosti, Luke Clanton, Pontus Nyholm 12:30 p.m. – Emiliano Grillo, Charley Hoffman, Danny Willett 12:41 p.m. – Matt Wallace, Matti Schmid, S.H. Kim 12:52 p.m. – Mackenzie Hughes, Denny McCarthy, Austin Smotherman 1:03 p.m. – Viktor Hovland, Brooks Koepka, Corey Conners 1:14 p.m. – Xander Schauffele, Keegan Bradley, Patrick Cantlay 1:25 p.m. – Ricky Castillo, J.J. Spaun, Billy Horschel 1:36 p.m. – Andrew Novak, Karl Vilips, Sungjae Im 1:47 p.m. – Lee Hodges, Mark Hubbard, Henrik Norlander 1:58 p.m. – Erik van Rooyen, Tom Kim, Zac Blair 2:09 p.m. – Jesper Svensson, Zach Bauchou, Jeffrey Kang 2:20 p.m. – Kris Ventura, Kensei Hirata, Adrien Saddier
Tee No. 10
Advertisement
7:40 a.m. – Patton Kizzire, Gary Woodland, Adam Hadwin 7:51 a.m. – Taylor Moore, Beau Hossler, Joel Dahmen 8:02 a.m. – Peter Malnati, Nicolai Højgaard, Marco Penge 8:13 a.m. – Sam Ryder, Justin Thomas, Matt Fitzpatrick 8:24 a.m. – Jacob Bridgeman, Wyndham Clark, Jordan Spieth 8:35 a.m. – Ben Griffin, Sahith Theegala, Tony Finau 8:46 a.m. – Max Homa, Kevin Streelman, Danny Walker 8:57 a.m. – Vince Whaley, Kristoffer Reitan, Johnny Keefer 9:08 a.m. – David Skinns, Dan Brown, Davis Chatfield 9:19 a.m. – Jordan Smith, David Ford, Greg Koch 9:30 a.m. – Adrien Dumont de Chassart, Jimmy Stanger, Tyler Wilkes 12:25 p.m. – Alex Smalley, Justin Lower, Max McGreevy 12:36 p.m. – Brandt Snedeker, Christiaan Bezuidenhout, Takumi Kanaya 12:47 p.m. – Thorbjørn Olesen, Chandler Phillips, Hank Lebioda 12:58 p.m. – Steven Fisk, Nick Taylor, Aaron Rai 1:09 p.m. – Brian Campbell, Cam Davis, Patrick Rodgers 1:20 p.m. – Matt McCarty, Davis Thompson, Matt Kuchar 1:31 p.m. – Joe Highsmith, Davis Riley, Pierceson Coody 1:42 p.m. – Matthieu Pavon, Eric Cole, Kevin Roy 1:53 p.m. – Chad Ramey, Andrew Putnam, Luke Guthrie 2:04 p.m. – Jeremy Paul, A.J. Ewart, Gordon Sargent 2:15 p.m. – John Parry, John VanDerLaan, Marcelo Rozo
This week in Bamberger Briefly, a wee three-part series over three days that explores different aspects of a phrase no golfer wants to say but most golfers eventually will: Can’t play today — my back went out. This series culls nuggets and insights from a recent GOLF.com interview with Dr. Tom LaFountain, PGA Tour director of chiropractic services, who over the past 27 years and counting has seen some of the most famous backs in golf up close and personal.
Part I: Explosive Swings + Exploding Purses = Exploding Backs
When Tom LaFountain first got on Tour as a chiropractor, in the late 1990s, after years tending to Olympic athletes, he was amazed to see Tom Watson, Jay Haas and Bernhard Langer still playing regularly. As they got into their late 40s, each of them had the expectation of turning 50, getting on the Champions tour while continuing to play in some Tour events and to generally keep on keeping on. And they did.
That trio, among many other pros with familiar surnames, loved golf, loved competing and had bodies that held up. Yes, scores of these Tour players went in for replacement parts at 40,000 miles, and 80 and 100. Many of them had weeks here and there when they were on the sidelines for rest and recovery. But they never experienced career-ending back issues. They all had the ability and willingness to take something off the speed of their swings as needed, get around for a while some other way, preserve their backs, live to golf another week. The mid-tournament WD was not a thing. Most weeks, there wasn’t one. For one thing, quitting showed weakness. For another, the players didn’t come all this way to not cash a check.
Early on, LaFountain observed that 85 percent of the players who entered Tour fitness trailers with pain had lower back issues. Over the past 27 years, that percentage has not changed. What has changed, LaFountain says, is the numbers of players in discomfort, or worse. The issues are deeper. It used to be muscles and joints. Now it’s muscles, joints — and discs. And LaFountain knows why: The swing has changed.
Advertisement
“The swing is much faster, there is more torque and rotation, there is much more pressure on the lower back,” he said in a recent interview. “There’s an arms race for distance that didn’t used to exist. Look at a guy like Jimmy Fuyrk. He’d say, ‘Yeah, there are guys hitting it 320, but I max out at 280, 290. So I’ll figure it out from there.’ And he played forever.’” That mindset is dead, LaFountain said. Last rites were read by various Trackman boxes up-and-down Tour driving ranges.
Of the threesome of lifers cited at the top here, Tom Watson had a body that would not quit, Jay Haas had a unique straight-up, tension-free backswing and Bernhard Langer lived in the gym, lifting some with light weights — and stretching more. At 52 he looked 32. He hadn’t gained five pounds. He played so much his body didn’t know what it was like not to play.
As it played out, all three of them had pro careers that were still remarkably productive at their 40-year marks. The same is true for an older generation of pros, Arnold Palmer, Gary Player, Jack Nicklaus, Hale Irwin, Billy Casper, Chi Chi Rodriguez among them. (You could go on and on from there.) You could create a similar list of younger players, including Fred Funk, Colin Montgomerie and Tom Lehman. And, younger yet, Zach Johnson, Henrik Stenson, Stewart Cink, all in their early 50s, and Phil Mickelson and Furyk, both 55.
They are the end of the line, LaFountain says. Rory McIlroy, 36, who withdrew from the Bay Hill event a couple of weeks ago with a tweaked back, is already saying there is no chance he’ll still be playing professional golf in his 50s. Tiger Woods, who is 50, has barely played since 2020. A career that goes on and on and on, in the Watson-Haas-Langer tradition, is not even an aspiration, per LaFountain. “They want to make it now,” LaFountain said. “They’re playing for so much money, and distance is so paramount, that they will swing as hard as they possibly can to make as much money in a short period of time as they possibly can, and be set up for the rest of their lives. The lure of making more now they compromise career length to make the money now.”
In 1995, the year before Woods turned pro, the total purse for the PGA Tour season was $66 million. Greg Norman was the leading money winner, earning $1.6 million. In 2025, the total purse was $565 million. Scottie Scheffler made $19.5 million, just on the course. Lee Hodges finished 94th on the money list and made $1.6 million. The mentality, LaFountain said, is make it while you can. That is, make as much as you can in the shortest time possible.
“That’s especially true for the players from overseas,” LaFountain said. “Their families are thousands of miles away, their friends, the lives they know best. It can be lonely, playing here. But [outside of a LIV invite] there’s nowhere else in the world they can make this kind of money. If they win, great. But if they don’t they’re still making great money.” The closer you are to the green after one shot, on every par-4 and par-5 hole you play, the more money you will make. That means swinging hard, the lower body winding up against the upper body.
;)
;)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login