Connect with us

Sports

March Madness: What the NCAA tournament selection committee got right and wrong

Published

on

A basketball fan has roughly a 1 in 120.2 billion chance of filling out a perfect NCAA tournament bracket.

Those are about the same odds the NCAA men’s basketball selection committee has to unveil a new bracket without any nitpicking.

Advertisement

This year’s committee did an unusually good job overall, nailing which teams belonged on the No. 1 seed line and including the 68 most deserving teams in the field. The loudest complaints mostly target questionable seeding decisions or imbalanced regions.

Advertisement

[Enter Yahoo Bracket Mayhem for shot at 50K | Printable bracket]

Here’s a closer look at what the committee got right and wrong:

What the committee got right: Valuing the Sunday conference tournament games 

For years, the selection committee has faced criticism for ignoring the seeding ramifications of Sunday conference tournament games. Tournament champions from the SEC and Big Ten in particular have long complained that the committee doesn’t account for those games and their victories haven’t resulted in the expected seeding bump.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That certainly seemed to be a complaint that this year’s committee was determined to address. Committee chairman Keith Gill said that he and his colleagues elevated Purdue from the No. 11 overall team on its seed list to No. 8 after the Boilermakers upset Michigan in Sunday’s Big Ten title game. That allowed Purdue to deservingly leapfrog Michigan State for the final No. 2 seed.

That wasn’t the only tweak the committee made to the bracket after the Big Ten title game went final. It also flip-flopped Michigan and Arizona on the overall seed list, elevating the Wildcats to the No. 2 overall 1 seed and dropping the Wolverines to the No. 3.

Further down the bracket, the committee also clearly accounted for Penn’s surprise victory over Yale in the Ivy League title game. Rather than just slot the Quakers into Yale’s projected No. 12 or 13 seed, the committee properly moved other teams up and slotted Penn as a No. 14.

This is an encouraging development and a long overdue one. These Sunday conference tournament games can’t just exist so the major TV networks have a way of leading into their selection shows. They also have to matter.

Advertisement
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA - MARCH 14: Head coach Jon Scheyer talks with Maliq Brown #6 of the Duke Blue Devils in the first half against the Virginia Cavaliers during the finals of the men's ACC Tournament at Spectrum Center on March 14, 2026 in Charlotte, North Carolina. (Photo by Jacob Kupferman/Getty Images)

Jon Scheyer and the Duke Blue Devils got the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA tournament, but they didn’t get the easiest draw. (Jacob Kupferman/Getty Images)

(Jacob Kupferman via Getty Images)

What the committee got wrong: The No. 1 overall seed getting the toughest region

So much for the narrative that Duke always gets a favorable draw.

Advertisement

This year’s committee rightfully awarded the Blue Devils with the No. 1 overall seed and then foisted upon them the most challenging path to the Final Four of any team on the top seed line.

It starts with the quality of the East Region’s other top teams. UConn was the strongest No. 2 seed that the Blue Devils could have drawn since the committee’s bracketing principles prevent them from placing the overall No. 1 seed and the highest-rated No. 2 (Houston) in the same region. Michigan State was the committee’s highest-rated No. 3 seed. Kansas is an inconsistent but dangerous No. 4 seed. And reigning Big East regular season and tournament champion St. John’s is underseeded as the East’s No 5.

Advertisement

Heck, even Duke’s potential second-round matchup against eighth-seeded Ohio State is far from a cakewalk. The Buckeyes are a borderline Top 25 team in the major predictive metrics and are peaking entering the NCAA tournament.

As if the quality of the teams isn’t proof alone that the East is the toughest region, consider the pedigree of the coaches. Jon Scheyer will match wits against former national champions Dan Hurley, Tom Izzo, Rick Pitino and Bill Self.

Advertisement

That is a gauntlet.

Advertisement

If you caught him in an honest moment off-camera, how much do you want to bet that Scheyer would trade paths with Michigan or Arizona right now?

What the committee got right: The 68 most deserving teams made the field

Sorry, Bruce Pearl.

No matter how incessantly you stump for your son’s Auburn team, the committee was correct to leave the Tigers out.

Never before has an at-large bid been awarded to a team with 16 or more total losses or to a team that is just a single game over .500. Auburn didn’t accomplish enough to persuade this year’s committee to break with either precedent.

Advertisement

Advertisement

The case for Auburn was that the Tigers have played the nation’s second-toughest schedule and showed the ability to defeat elite teams. They boasted marquee wins over Florida, St. John’s, Arkansas and Kentucky, as well as victories over fellow bubble teams NC State and Texas.

The problem is that Auburn simply didn’t win enough games. The Tigers went 4-13 in Quadrant 1 games and 11-16 against the top three Quadrants. Yes, they played a lot of good teams, but they lost to most of them.

NC State, Texas, SMU and Miami (Ohio) were the committee’s lowest-ranked at-large teams in the field and will battle it out in the First Four to advance to the main draw. Oklahoma, Auburn, San Diego State and Indiana were the first four teams left out.

Advertisement

It’s hard to argue with any of that. Even NC State’s surprise demotion to the First Four was the proper call. Eleven Quadrant 1 and 2 wins was impressive, but the North Carolina win came without Caleb Wilson and Henri Veesaar, the Clemson and SMU wins depreciated in value and none of the others came against top-40 teams in the NET.

Advertisement

What the committee got wrong: Vanderbilt as a No. 5 seed

Vanderbilt has more reason to complain about its seeding than any other team in the NCAA tournament field.

How did the Commodores get stuck with a No. 5 seed when their resume appeared strong enough to give them an outside chance at the last No. 3?

Advertisement

Start with Vanderbilt’s team-sheet metrics. The Commodores ranked between 7th and ninth in the results-based metrics and between 10th and 14th in the predictive ones. In other words, not a single metric deemed Vanderbilt worse than a No. 4 seed and some had Mark Byington’s team higher than that.

Vanderbilt’s 17-8 record against the top two quadrants is also impressive. In non-league play, Vanderbilt announced itself as a team to watch by going undefeated and by taking down NCAA tournament-bound Saint Mary’s, UCF, VCU and SMU. The Commodores then finished tied for fourth in the SEC in the regular season and advanced to Sunday’s conference tournament title game, ousting Tennessee and Florida before falling to Arkansas.

Advertisement

Compare Vanderbilt’s resume to No. 4 seeds Alabama or Nebraska. Heck, the Commodores even have a case to bypass Virginia for the final No. 3 seed.

Advertisement

The only silver lining for Vanderbilt is that drawing 12th-seeded McNeese is manageable, as is a potential second-round matchup with fourth-seeded Nebraska The selection committee owed the Commodores that much.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Who is in the women’s college basketball tournament?

Published

on

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The NCAA Women’s Basketball Tournament field was revealed on Sunday night – a few hours after the men’s programs learned where they would be playing in their tournament.

The UConn Huskies were named the No. 1 overall seed of the tournament as the program pursues its 13th national championship. The Huskies are the only undefeated team in Division I college basketball and are led by Sarah Strong and Azzi Fudd. Strong is averaging 18.5 points per game and Fudd is averaging 17.7.

Dawn Staley’s South Carolina Gamecocks earned the No. 1 seed in Region 4. The team is 31-3 this season and won the SEC regular season title. Joyce Edwards leads the team with 19.6 points per game while Madina Okot is averaging 13.4 points and 10.9 rebounds per game.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Sarah Strong dribbles around a defender

UConn forward Sarah Strong (21) looks to shoot at Creighton center Elizabeth Gentry defends during first half of an NCAA college basketball game in the semifinals of the Big East tournament, Sunday, March 8, 2026, in Uncasville, Connecticut. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill)

The UCLA Bruins will look to dethrone UConn this year. The Lauren Betts-led team was 31-1 this season. Betts is leading in points per game (16.4), rebounds per game (8.6) and blocks per game (1.6) for the Bruins.

The Texas Longhorns got the other No. 1 seed of the tournament. The Longhorns finished just behind South Carolina in the SEC in the regular season but won the tournament championship. Madison Booker is leading the team with 18.9 points per game and 6.5 assists per game.

The First Four matchups include Missouri and Stephen F. Austin and Southern and Samford fighting for the No. 16 seeds. Nebraska takes on Richmond for an 11th seed and Virginia and Arizona State will square off for the 10th seed. These games take place Wednesday and Thursday.

Advertisement

The tournament will begin on Friday and Saturday. The Final Four will take place on April 3 and the championship will be played on April 5.

PENN’S TJ POWER TAKES ADVANTAGE OF MASSIVE YALE BLUNDER TO PUNCH TICKET TO MARCH MADNESS

Region 1 – Fort Worth

1. UConn Huskies (33-0) vs. 16. UTSA (18-15)

8. Iowa State (22-9) vs. 9. Syracuse (23-8)

Advertisement

5. Maryland (23-8) vs. 12. Murray State (31-3)

4. North Carolina (26-7) vs. 13. Western Illinois (26-5)

6. Notre Dame (22-10) vs. 11. Fairfield (28-4)

7. Illinois (21-11) vs. 10. Colorado (22-11)

Advertisement

2. Vanderbilt (27-4) vs. 15. High Point (27-5)

2026 NCAA MEN’S BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT SELECTIONS REVEALED

Dawn Staley coaches from the sideline

South Carolina head coach Dawn Staley reacts during the second half of an NCAA college basketball game against Texas in the final of the Southeastern Conference tournament, Sunday, March 8, 2026, in Greenville, South Carolina. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)

Region 4 – Sacramento

1. South Carolina (31-3) vs. 16. Southern/Samford

8. Clemson (21-11) vs. 9. USC (17-13)

Advertisement

5. Michigan State (22-8) vs. 12. Colorado State (27-7)

4. Oklahoma (24-7) vs. 13. Idaho (29-5)

6. Washington (21-10) vs. 11. South Dakota State (27-6)

3. TCU (29-5) vs. 14. UC San Diego (24-8)

Advertisement

7. Georgia (22-9) vs. 10. Virginia/Arizona State

2. Iowa (26-6) vs. 15. Fairleigh Dickinson (30-4)

Region 2 – Sacramento

Lauren Betts looks to shoot

UCLA center Lauren Betts (51) shoots over Iowa center Ava Heiden (5) in the second half of an NCAA college basketball game in the finals of the Big Ten Conference tournament, Sunday, March 8, 2026 in Indianapolis.  (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

1. UCLA (31-1) vs. 16. California Baptist (23-10)

8. Oklahoma State (23-9) vs. 9. Princeton (26-3)

Advertisement

5. Ole Miss (23-11) vs. 12. Gonzaga (24-9)

4. Minnesota (22-8) vs. 13. Green Bay (25-8)

6. Baylor (24-8) vs. 11. Nebraska/Richmond

3. Duke (24-8) vs. 14. Charleston (27-5)

Advertisement

7. Texas Tech (25-7) vs. 10. Villanova (25-7)

2. LSU (27-5) vs. 15. Jacksonville (24-8)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Region 3 – Fort Worth

1. Texas (31-3) vs. 16. Stephen F. Austin/Missouri State

Advertisement

8. Oregon (22-12) vs. 9. Virginia Tech (23-9)

5. Kentucky (23-10) vs. 12. James Madison (26-8)

4. West Virginia (27-6) vs. 13. Miami-Ohio (28-6)

6. Alabama (23-10) vs. 11. Rhodie Island (28-4)

Advertisement

3. Louisville (27-7) vs. 14. Vermont (27-7)

7. NC State (20-10) vs. 10. Tennessee (16-13)

2. Michigan (25-6) vs. 15. Holy Cross (23-9)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Man United latest: Scott McTominay makes a statement as club learn midfielder’s price

Published

on

Manchester United defeated fellow top-four contenders Aston Villa 3-1 in convincing fashion on Sunday afternoon

Manchester United dismantled Aston Villa 3-1 at Old Trafford on Sunday afternoon. Michael Carrick has now secured seven victories from nine matches this season, with Champions League qualification appearing increasingly probable.

Carrick’s side suffered a 2-1 defeat away at Newcastle United in their last fixture and benefited from an extended break between games due to their absence from FA Cup competition. They welcomed Unai Emery’s team at the weekend and following a scoreless opening half, triumphed 3-1 courtesy of goals from Casemiro, Matheus Cunha and Benjamin Sesko.

Advertisement

A visit to the resurgent Bournemouth awaits them next but away from the club, a former player made their much-anticipated comeback. Scott McTominay, who has flourished in Italy with Napoli following his departure from United in August 2024, returned from injury on Saturday evening.

Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our United WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. You can also join our United Facebook page by clicking HERE and don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.

The Scotland international was brought on at the interval against Lecce with Antonio Conte’s outfit behind 1-0 and he made a considerable impression. The Manchester Evening News delivers the latest developments from Old Trafford.

Scott McTominay impresses on return

McTominay had been absent since February with tendon inflammation and missed approximately a month, with Napoli’s medical team adopting a careful strategy. However, with his team trailing by a goal, Conte opted to reintroduce the 29-year-old at the interval and his gamble proved successful.

Advertisement

The midfielder instantly brought stability to the centre of the pitch and within moments of his introduction, Napoli drew level through United loanee Rasmus Hojlund.

Then, in the 68th minute, their fightback was completed by Matteo Politano. McTominay concluded the 2-1 triumph with a 90 per cent pass accuracy and served as a statement to United about the influential player they allowed to leave for a mere £26million.

Conte said after the match: “We were losing and I had to make changes. They’re strong players but you have to give them time to get used to the pace and intensity again, and that’s not easy. They need to have confidence, though, because the greater good is Napoli, and since I’m dealing with well-prepared and decent players, there are no problems.

Advertisement

“McTominay had been out for a month. I had to take on some responsibilities, and so did they. The common good, I repeat, is Napoli and we must secure qualification for the Champions League, which is too important. It is important for the top clubs, let alone for us.”

Man Utd learn Real Madrid star’s price

Whilst McTominay continues to excel at Napoli, another highly-rated midfielder in Europe could be seeking a move away. Reports indicate that Real Madrid star Eduardo Camavinga is a player the club are prepared to entertain offers for.

According to Marca, Los Blancos have placed a £43m valuation on Camavinga. The French international has been at the Bernabeu since 2021 following his transfer from Rennes.

Advertisement

However, he has recently found playing time hard to come by and it’s been hinted that he could soon be facing the axe. A number of Premier League clubs have reportedly expressed interest and United were initially associated with Camavinga before his move to Spain almost five years ago.

Sky Sports discounted Premier League and EFL package

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
Content Image

£49

£35

Sky

Advertisement

Get Sky Sports here

Sky has slashed the price of its Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle for the 2025/26 season, saving £336 and offering more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.

Sky shows at least 215 live Premier League games each season, an increase of up to 100, plus Formula 1, darts, golf and more.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Duke, Arizona, Michigan, Florida earn NCAA top seeds; Miami (Ohio) last team in

Published

on

NCAA Basketball: Southern Methodist at DukeJan 10, 2026; Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Blue Devils forward Cameron Boozer (12) talks to head coach Jon Scheyer during the first half against the Southern Methodist Mustangs at Cameron Indoor Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Rob Kinnan-Imagn Images

They were mocked by pundits across the nation, their schedule was scoffed at and when they finally lost, bubble teams saw renewed hope.

But here is how you now refer to the Miami (Ohio) RedHawks: 2026 NCAA Tournament participants.

The RedHawks (31-1) barely skated into the March Madness field as one of the final four teams chosen on Sunday.

But that beats being passed over, and Miami will face SMU (20-13) in the First Four at Dayton, located just 42 miles away from Miami.

Miami had some nervous moments in recent days after losing to UMass in its opening game of the Mid-American Conference tournament. Akron ended up winning the MAC’s automatic berth.

Advertisement

The other First Four matchup on an 11-seed line is North Carolina State (20-13) against Texas (18-14).

Duke, Arizona, Michigan and Florida were selected as the four No. 1 seeds by the selection committee.

Duke (32-2) is the No. 1 seed in the East. UConn (29-5) is the No. 2, followed by Michigan State (25-7) and Kansas (23-10).

The Blue Devils will take aim at reaching the Final Four for the second straight year. Duke meets No. 16 Siena (23-11) in the first round on Thursday at Greenville, S.C. UConn won back-to-back national titles in 2023-24.

Advertisement

Arizona (32-2) was placed in the West as the No. 1 seed. The Wildcats look to overcome a long drought as they haven’t reached the Final Four since losing the national title game in 2001. Arizona opens with No. 16 seed Long Island (24-10) on Friday in San Diego.

Purdue (27-8) is the No. 2 seed, Gonzaga (30-3) is No. 3 and Arkansas (26-8) is No. 4.

Michigan (31-3) landed the No. 1 seed in the Midwest. Iowa State (27-7) is No. 2, Virginia (29-5) landed the No. 3 spot and Alabama (23-9) is No. 4.

Advertisement

The Wolverines will play the winner of the First Four matchup between UMBC and Howard. This is the first appearance for the Retrievers since the famous 16 vs. 1 victory over Virginia in 2018.

Santa Clara (26-8) drew the No. 10 seed in the Midwest to make the March Madness field for the first time since 1996 when the Broncos were in for the third time in four seasons to end the Steve Nash era.

Defending champion Florida (26-7) earned the top seed in the South and will face either Lehigh or Prairie View A&M in the first round.

Houston (28-6), which lost to the Gators in last season’s final, is also in the South as the No. 2 team. Illinois (24-8) is No. 3 and Nebraska (26-6) is No. 4. The Cornhuskers are 0-8 all-time in NCAA Tournament play and lost in the first round to Texas A&M in 2024 in their most recent appearance.

Advertisement

The first four out were Oklahoma (19-15), Auburn (17-16), San Diego State (22-11) and Indiana (18-14). Former Auburn coach Bruce Pearl — whose son Steven now coaches the team — had been banging the drum the loudest for the Tigers to be in at Miami’s expense.

The NCAA Tournament appearance is the first for the RedHawks since 2007.

–Field Level Media

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

ICC Trophy Pakistan – “Will You Steal ICC Trophy Now?” Pakistan Team, Mohsin Naqvi Blasted By Ex-Star After Bangladesh Humiliation

Published

on




Pakistan Cricket Team, Mohsin Naqvi face ICC Trophy jibe: Pakistan cricket hit a new low on Sunday after it lost a three-ODI series to Bangladesh. The series loss marked the start of Pakistan’s rebuilding phase after an early T20 World Cup exit on a losing note. In the series-deciding third ODI, Salman Ali Agha’s century wasn’t enough as Bangladesh beat the new-look Pakistan by 11 runs in the final one-day international to win the series 2-1. Agha hit 106 off 98 balls, but his dismissal in the 48th over saw Pakistan eventually getting bowled out for 279, with skipper Shaheen Shah Afridi stumped off the final ball of the doomed chase.

Former Pakistan star Kamran Akmal, who has also served as a selector, was furious after the loss. “The condition is such that now even Netherlands would want to play a series against us, then beat us and get Test status. This is the condition of Pakistan cricket now,” Akmal said in a discussion.

“They (Bangladesh) could have easily scored 350 today, but scored only 290. Litton Das played slowly. Even then we lost.”

Advertisement

He went on to take a swipe at Pakistan Cricket Board chief Mohsin Naqvi, who is infamous for taking away the 2025 Asia Cup trophy after winners India refused to accept it from him. The champions are yet to receive the trophy, as it reportedly lies in Naqvi’s office.

“If you don’t beat teams in matches, will you now steal ICC trophies and bring them home?” Akmal said.

Opening batter Tanzid Hasan‘s (107) first ODI hundred had earlier propelled Bangladesh to 290-5 after Afridi won the toss and elected to field on the same bouncy wicket where Pakistan was bowled out for 114 in the first game, which Bangladesh won by eight wickets.

Bangladesh lost the second ODI by 128 runs under the DLS Method when it was also dismissed for 114.

Advertisement

“Definitely (it) was an excellent match,” Bangladesh captain Mehidy Hasan Miraz said. “It was an excellent wicket and if we got 300 it would be better, but we are playing well, especially the way Tanzid batted.”

A revamped Pakistan, which awarded six ODI debuts in the series, struggled to cope with the pace of Taskin Ahmed (4-49) and Nahid Rana (2-62), and slipped to 17-3 after the first three overs of its chase.

Taskin had Sahibzada Farhan caught behind off a nippy short ball before rattling the off stump of Mohammad Rizwan (4). Rana continued to impress with his pace in the series when opener Maaz Sadaqat (6) lobbed an easy catch behind after a mistimed pull shot.

Ghazi Ghori (29) and Abdul Samad (34), two of the six Pakistan debutants in the series, revived the chase with a 50-run stand before Pakistan lost both of them to Bangladesh’s pace attack and slipped to 82-5 in the 18th over.

Advertisement

But Agha brought Pakistan back into the hunt with a 79-run stand with Saad Masood (38) and added 52 runs with Afridi for the eighth wicket. Agha completed his third ODI hundred off 89 balls with nine fours and four sixes, before Taskin deceived the batter with a slower ball and had him caught at deep mid-wicket.

With 28 needed off the final two overs, Afridi smacked Mustafizur Rahman (3-54) for two big sixes in the penultimate over and reduced the target to 14 off the final six balls. Rishad Hossain stayed calm and had Afridi stumped to complete a memorable series win for Bangladesh.

Topics mentioned in this article

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

If you give him the No. 6 or No. 7 role, it’s a difficult role to play

Published

on

Former India player Aakash Chopra has reckoned that lower-middle-order batting could be the Lucknow Super Giants’ (LSG) biggest challenge in IPL 2026. He noted that Josh Inglis will find it difficult if he is asked to bat at No. 6 or No. 7.

LSG acquired Inglis for ₹8.60 crore at the IPL 2026 auction. However, it’s unclear whether the Australian wicketkeeper-batter would be available for the entirety of the upcoming edition of the prestigious league.

In a video shared on his YouTube channel, ‘Aakash Chopra,’ the former India opener highlighted the Lucknow Super Giants‘ lower-middle-order batting challenges heading into IPL 2026.

“What are the weaknesses? Instead of weaknesses, I am looking towards challenges. If Josh Inglis plays in the lower-middle order, it means four overseas batters would play, but Josh Inglis is at his best if you play him in the top four. If you give him the No. 6 or No. 7 role, it’s a difficult role to play,” he said.

While acknowledging that LSG have a few decent Indian lower-middle-order batters, Chopra pointed out that they lack experience.

“You see slight problems with players there. Ayush Badoni, Abdul Samad and Shahbaz Ahmed are there. They are all good. Badoni’s form is very good, Abdul Samad hits decent sixes, but the experience is not seen in the lower-middle order,” he observed.

Citing Sherfane Rutherford, Tristan Stubbs and Tim David as examples, Aakash Chopra highlighted that IPL teams generally have at least one strong overseas lower-middle-order striker. He noted that the absence of any such player might come back to bite LSG.


“The shadow of injuries is inseparable from this team” – Aakash Chopra on LSG’s other challenges heading into IPL 2026

Lucknow Super Giants Players Practice Before Game With Delhi Capitals - Source: GettyLucknow Super Giants Players Practice Before Game With Delhi Capitals - Source: Getty
Lucknow Super Giants Players Practice Before Game With Delhi Capitals – Source: Getty

In the same video, Aakash Chopra noted that the presence of injury-prone seamers could be another challenge for the Lucknow Super Giants in IPL 2026.

“There is a huge injury concern among Indian fast bowlers. Mohammad Shami has come and will hopefully remain fit. Mayank Yadav is injury-prone. Then Avesh Khan and Mohsin Khan. Even Anrich Nortje has come back after an injury. The shadow of injuries is inseparable from this team,” he said.

While pointing out that Wanindu Hasaranga‘s potential absence could be a challenge in the spin-bowling department, the cricketer-turned-commentator added that opposition batters might read Digvesh Rathi better in IPL 2026.

Advertisement

“They let Ravi Bishnoi go and picked Wanindu Hasaranga in his place. If he is also not there, there could be a challenge in spin. Digvesh Rathi was brilliant, but now, as he plays more, people will start understanding him. So he will have to reinvent himself,” Chopra observed.

Wanindu Hasaranga, who was bought by the Lucknow Super Giants for ₹2 crore at the IPL 2026 auction, suffered a hamstring injury during the T20 World Cup 2026. Digvesh Rathi (14 scalps at an economy rate of 8.25 in 13 innings) was LSG’s highest wicket-taker in IPL 2025.