Ishan Kishan and Aiden Markram will be crucial batters for their respective sides when the Men in Blue face South Africa at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad on Sunday, February 22 in a Group 1 Super 8 clash. Both India and South Africa topped their respective groups to progress to the Super 8s.
Kishan is India’s leading run-getter in the tournament heading into the Super 8 stage. In four innings, he has scored 176 runs at an average of 44 and a strike rate of 202.30, with two half-centuries. On the other hand, Markram has scored 178 runs at an average of 59.33 and a strike rate of 187.37, with two fifties.
Kishan has featured in 40 T20I matches so far. Ahead of the India vs South Africa T20 World Cup 2026 Super 8 clash, we compare his stats with those of Markram after the latter had also played the same number of T20I matches.
Ishan Kishan vs Aiden Markram – Who has a better average and strike rate after 40 T20Is?
In 40 T20Is, Kishan has scored 1,187 runs at an average of 30.43 and a strike rate of 144.75. He has scored 318 runs in 11 T20Is against New Zealand at an average of 28.90 and a strike rate of 155.88. The southpaw has also scored 206 runs in five T20Is against South Africa at an average of 41.20 and a strike rate of 150.36. Also, he has 165 runs in six T20Is against Sri Lanka at a strike rate of 136.36.
After 40 T20Is, Markram had scored 1,130 runs, averaging 37.66 at a strike rate of 149.47. The Proteas batter had 251 runs in seven matches against West Indies at an average of 62.75 and a strike rate of 156.87. He had also scored 199 runs in five matches against Pakistan at an average of 39.80 and a strike rate of 177.67. Also, he scored 165 runs in five T20Is against India at a strike rate of 143.47.
Ishan Kishan vs Aiden Markram – Who has more 50-plus scores after 40 T20Is?
In 40 T20Is, Kishan has 10 50-plus scores to his name – one ton and nine fifties. He slammed 103 off just 43 balls against New Zealand in Thiruvananthapuram in January this year. The 27-year-old also struck 89 off 56 balls against Sri Lanka in Lucknow in February 2022 and 77 off 40 against Pakistan in Colombo in the group stage of the 2026 T20 World Cup.
(Kishan vs Markram – Batting stats comparison after 40 T20Is)
After 40 T20Is, Markram had nine half-centuries to his credit. His best at that stage was 70, which came off 48 balls against West Indies in St George’s in July 2021. The Proteas batter had also scored 63 off 31 balls against Pakistan in Centurion in April 2021. Of his T20I fifties at that stage, three had come against Pakistan and two each against England and West Indies.
Ishan Kishan vs Aiden Markram – Who has a better record in wins after 40 T20Is?
In 28 matches in wins, Kishan has scored 1,005 runs at an average of 35.89 and a strike rate of 150.22, with one hundred and eight fifties. In nine matches in losses, he has scored 157 runs, averaging 17.44 at a strike rate of 118.04, with one fifty. Kishan has 15 runs in one game that ended in no result and 10 runs in one match that ended in a tie.
(Kishan vs Markram – Batting stats comparison in wins after 40 T20Is)
In 24 matches in wins, Markram had scored 679 runs at an average of 42.43 and a strike rate of 149.88, with seven half-centuries. In 15 matches in losses, he had 451 runs, averaging 32.21 and a strike rate of 148.84, with two fifties. Markram did not bat in one game that ended in no result.
Ishan Kishan vs Aiden Markram – Who has a better record in chases after 40 T20Is?
In 12 T20Is in chases, Kishan has scored 336 runs at an average of 28 and a strike rate of 136.58, with three half-centuries. In 28 T20Is while batting first, he has 851 runs at an average of 31.51 and a strike rate of 148.25, with the aid of one ton and six half-centuries.
(Kishan vs Markram – Batting stats comparison in chases after 40 T20Is)
In 18 T20Is in chases, Markram had scored 434 runs at an average of 36.16 and a strike rate of 146.12, with three half-centuries. In 22 T20Is while batting first, he had 696 runs at an average of 38.66 and a strike rate of 151.63, with six fifties.
Edited by Renin Wilben Albert



