Connect with us

Sports

Ovechkin breaks NHL goal record but Putin link casts shadow

Published

on

Russian superstar Alexander Ovechkin has achieved something that seemed impossible just a few years ago; the man known as the “Great 8” has broken Wayne Gretzky’s all-time National Hockey League (NHL) regular-season record of 894 goals scored.

Goal number 895 went in a 4-1 loss in one of the final games of the Washington Capitals’ season in the US-Canadian NHL. Ovechkin was celebrated as a hero ― not just by fans of his Washington Capitals, but by ice hockey fans all over North America and beyond. There was no shortage of congratulations, including from NHL top brass, and the man whose record he is set to break, Wayne Gretzky.

“To be honest with you, when I was tying the record, I still can’t believe it,” Ovechkin said afterwards. “It was so emotional. Such a great night. But this is something crazier. I’m probably gonna need a couple of days, maybe a couple weeks, to realize what does it mean to be No. 1?

However, some are irritated or even disturbed by all this cheering. For Ovechkin is a left winger ― but only on the ice. More than three years after Vladimir Putin launched his war of aggression on neighboring Ukraine, Ovechkin’s Instagram profile picture remains a photo of him smiling beside the Russian president.

Advertisement

Indeed, the day after Ovechkin broke the record, Putin said the following in a statement released by the Kremlin: “This achievement has become not only your personal success, but also a real celebration for fans in Russia and abroad.”

Alexander Ovechkin's Instagram profile
Alexander Ovechkin’s Instagram profile photo remains one of him with Russian President Vladimir PutinImage: @aleksandrovechkinofficial/instagram

The NHL ‘metaphorically shrugs its shoulders’

It’s something that baffles some, like retired Canadian hockey journalist and international broadcaster Paul Romanuk.

“Just imagine for one moment if an NHL player like (Canadian superstar) Sidney Crosby’s social-media profile picture was him with his arm around Harvey Weinstein or Jeffrey Epstein – can you imagine the outrage? The league would order him to take it down immediately. The pushback on social media would be off the scales,” Romanuk told DW in a recent Zoom call.

“And yet you can have this great hockey player side-by-side with a dictator waging a war on an innocent country like Ukraine ― and the NHL metaphorically shrugs its shoulders.”

The profile photo is by no means a one-off, with Ovechkin taking credit for having launched the “PutinTeam” in 2017 to support the president in his 2018 reelection campaign.

Advertisement

Ovechkin’s public support of Putin has indeed put the NHL in a difficult position, and for the most part the league has been closed-lipped on the issue, apart from a statement released shortly after the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

NHL condemns invasion, concerned about players

“The National Hockey League condemns Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and urges a peaceful resolution as quickly as possible. Effective immediately, we are suspending our relationships with our business partners in Russia and we are pausing our Russian language social and digital media sites,” the league said.

At the same time, it expressed concern about the “well-being of the players from Russia, who play in the NHL on behalf of their NHL Clubs, and not on behalf of Russia.

Alexander Ovechkin stepping over the boards in an ice hockey match
Alexander Ovechkin always proudly represented Russia on the ice ― until an IIHF ban over the country’s invasion of UkraineImage: Laci Perenyi/IMAGO

The man himself has also remained tight-lipped about the invasion. DW attempted to reach out to him through the Washington Capitals for comment but received no answer. Ovechkin has only commented on it once, a day after Putin launched the invasion, on February 24,2022.

Asked by a reporter covering the Washington Capitals if he still supported Putin despite the invasion, Ovechkin replied: “Well, he’s my president.”

Advertisement

He did call for peace but declined to criticize Moscow’s military action.

“Please, no more war. It doesn’t matter who’s in the war — Russia, Ukraine, different countries,” he said.

In its statement, the NHL also expressed concern for its Russian players and their families, which it said had been placed in “an extremely difficult position.”

According to a 2022 New York Times article, it was concern about his family back in Russia, that made Ovechkin decide against changing his Instagram profile pic. This has been rejected by critics who argue that there has been no evidence of Putin’s regime retaliating against the families of athletes critical of the war.

Advertisement

Hockey Hall of Famer an outspoken critic

Since then, Ovechkin has gone on playing and putting up points, including a lot of goals for the Capitals. But the “elephant” in the room, as Romanuk calls it, has scarcely been mentioned in the North American media ― something that also sticks in the craw of Hockey Hall of Fame goaltender Dominik Hasek.

“Russia is committing the most terrible crimes, including genocide against Ukrainian children,” Hasek, a former Czech national team goalie, told DW in a written statement.

“And since every citizen is an advertisement for the actions of his country, this Russian citizen Ovechkin is currently a huge advertisement for the aggressive Russian war and other Russian crimes.”

Advertisement
Dominik Hasek playing for Spartak Moscow
Dominik Hasek, seen here playing for Spartak Moscow, is a member of both the Hockey Hall of Fame in Toronto and the IIHF Hall of FameImage: IMAGO

Popular with the fans

Many fans, though, seem to be willing to give Ovechkin the benefit of the doubt. When DW asked a random group of North America-based fans for their thoughts, support for the hockey player, who is undoubtedly one of the all-time greats, was unanimous.

Most said that in a particularly troubled world they just wanted to enjoy watching their favorite sport, unencumbered by politics. One noted that in the United States, the war in Ukraine seemed an awfully long way away. Another pointed to the fact that beyond Ovechkin’s Insta profile photo, as far as he knew, the player hadn’t actively publicly supported Putin’s war.

“As long as the NHL chooses to celebrate The Great 8 for his accomplishments, so should we. Putin is responsible for Putin, not Ovechkin,” he said.

The player vs. his political views

Hasek, for one, certainly won’t be celebrating whenever Ovechkin does break the record.

Putin is not willing to have peace: Estonian FM Tsahkna

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Advertisement

“If I applauded the record in any way, I would be contributing to this advertisement for a war that is responsible for a huge number of human lives [lost],” Hasek said.

Romanuk can’t say enough about Ovechkin’s skills and career.

“The hockey fan in me has great admiration for his accomplishments as a player. I do believe he is the greatest pure goal scorer in the history of the game,” he said.

But like Hasek, the former broadcaster, who called hundreds of NHL and international hockey games over his career, won’t be raising a glass whenever Ovechkin gets that record-breaking goal.

Advertisement

“The short answer is no. I have no respect for the person and his political views and who he chooses to align himself with. I’ll be shaking my head and (thinking) I still don’t understand why the NHL has stood by and given a collective shrug of the shoulders to the Ukrainian people and the elephant in the room, which is Alexander Ovechkin’s support of Vladimir Putin.”

Jonathan Crane contributed to this article. This article was updated after Ovechkin broke the record on April 6.

Edited by: Matt Pearson

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

Ceolwulf’s resurgence puts spring in Schofield’s step for 2026

Published

on

Jockeys rarely express satisfaction after a horse they ride is beaten, but Chad Schofield was an exception after Ceolwulf secured the runner-up position behind Lindermann in the Chelmsford Stakes.

After a disappointing autumn campaign where the gelding’s season was halted by foot issues and a minor bleed, Schofield was delighted with Ceolwulf’s charge from the rear on the home turn to finish second in a race controlled by the leader.

This performance followed a fifth-place debut behind Autumn Glow in the Winx Stakes (1400m), but it was Ceolwulf’s Chelmsford run that convinced Schofield the horse had returned to his peak.

“He got beaten, but I left the races very happy because I feel like Joe (Pride) has got him right where he wants him and he’s tracking very well for the races later on,” Schofield stated.

Advertisement

“He didn’t come up last ‘prep’, but that’s probably why I left the races so happy. He felt as good as he has ever felt. For me, that was the main thing.

“We know he’s a horse that comes good for his grand finals and at the end of his prep and that seems to be the case again.”

Ceolwulf is set to have his third start this preparation in Saturday’s 7 Stakes (1600m) at Randwick, where he will again face Autumn Glow.

From the trainer’s perspective, Pride is uncertain if the race will offer the backmarker an ideal scenario, particularly from the outside draw of seven, but he anticipates another strong showing.

Advertisement

“I don’t know if we’re guaranteed any more tempo here again, but it would be nice,” Pride commented.

“The horse is ready though. He’s had his two runs back now, so he’s getting into that zone where he starts to do his best.”

Having won the King Charles III Stakes (1600m) for the last two years, Pride has not yet finalised Ceolwulf’s attempt at a third consecutive victory.

While he is confident the race conditions suit his charge, he is aware that it is a carnival target for Autumn Glow, and if she maintains that focus, it may lead Pride to consider other options.

Advertisement

“I haven’t one hundred per cent decided whether we’re going King Charles or Cox Plate. Saturday will probably help mould that decision and send us the right way,” Pride said.

“He’s got four group ones at 1600 metres, so I’d be pretty brave saying he’s better at 2000 metres, but that doesn’t mean he can’t win a good Group One over 2000.

“I’m thinking about his opposition more than about him in that regard.”

Stablemates Headley Grange and Private Eye have both been entered for the Bill Ritchie Handicap (1400m), a race intended as a stepping stone towards more significant targets later in their campaigns.

Advertisement

“It’s really just a pathway race for them,” Pride explained.

“Private Eye needs to get his confidence back. Headley Grange, he doesn’t lack confidence, but he might run there because we’re going to eventually go to the Alan Brown (Stakes).”

Both will be ridden by their regular jockeys, Adam Hyeronimus on Headley Grange and Nash Rawiller aboard Private Eye. The 7 Stakes is shaping up to be a key race to watch with online bookmakers.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Sepals and Von Hauke eye Group 1 success in 2026 Sir Rupert Clarke Stakes

Published

on

The previous outing for Sepals and Von Hauke saw them finish second and third respectively in a Group 1 race in Brisbane.

The duo is now gearing up for another attempt at Group 1 level, this time competing in the Sir Rupert Clarke Stakes (1400m) at Caulfield this Saturday.

In June, Sepals and Von Hauke secured second and third place behind Spicy Martini on a rain-affected track in the Stradbroke Handicap (1400m) at Eagle Farm, before enjoying a break in Queensland.

During the Stradbroke Handicap, they occupied adjacent stalls, 16 and 17. On Saturday, they will again start from neighbouring barriers, with Sepals in stall five and Von Hauke in stall six.

Advertisement

Trainer Cliff Brown has often faced challenges with poor barrier draws for this pair, especially in Group races, necessitating a conservative racing style. However, this Saturday could offer a different scenario, particularly for Von Hauke.

“He’s more tractable now Von Hauke,” Brown commented. “He can be handy, but he hasn’t drawn well in the past which has cost him. Sepals can go forward, go back, it depends on how he jumps. They will both come on for the run, which is normal for my horses.”

Sepals has the chance to become the first horse since Testa Rossa in 1999-2000 to achieve consecutive wins in the Sir Rupert Clarke Stakes.

Under Craig Williams’ direction, Sepals overcame a slow start and barrier 14 to win the Group 1 prize last year carrying 52kg.

Advertisement

Sepals will carry 56.5kg this year and will be ridden by Ethan Brown, while Harry Coffey, who guided Von Hauke in Brisbane, will again partner the horse on Saturday.

Brown has adopted a similar preparation strategy for both horses, involving two jump-outs for each.

Von Hauke’s most recent jump-out occurred at Caulfield Heath in early September, while Sepals completed a jump-out at Sandown last week.

“They’ll both be fit enough for 1400 metres, but with improvement to come,” Brown stated. “Vonnie is very good. He’s interesting. He’s quite a gross horse but comes on quite quick. He’s had a couple of gallops since his last jump-out while I trialled Sepals last week, a bit closer to the race. He won first-up last year, but he was scratched two weeks earlier because he went off in the gates and hit his head. That’s why he had that extra trial last year and that’s why I’ve trialled him a bit closer to Saturday because he can get that bit fresh.”

Advertisement

The 2026 Sir Rupert Clarke Stakes is set to be a competitive race; consider checking out the latest online bookmakers for your wagers.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Every Man United VAR controversy this season as Pro Ref admits Man City ‘error in judgement’

Published

on

Manchester United have already been involved in several major VAR incidents in the Premier League this season

Manchester United have experienced huge VAR calls in the early weeks of the new Premier League campaign. It has been a disappointing start to the season for Michael Carrick’s side, who have picked up four points from their first four games after losing the Manchester derby on Sunday.

The recent 1-0 defeat by Manchester City centred around key refereeing decisions at Old Trafford. Phil Foden was sent off for City after kicking out at Bruno Fernandes, though replays appeared to show the United captain kicking Foden first. Fernandes escaped further punishment, but United legend Roy Keane believed the midfielder was fortunate.

Advertisement

“Bruno goes in, tackles him, clearly fouls him and gives him a little boot on the floor,” he told Sky Sports. “Foden gets up, does react, and he’s now sent off. I’m guessing it’s classed as violent conduct, but to me Bruno’s the one who’s violent here. I have to call it out.”

The biggest controversy of the Manchester derby stemmed from the game’s only goal, with Pro Ref admitting to an “error of judgement” regarding Erling Haaland’s winner. The striker converted a deflected cross shortly after his teammate Enzo Fernandez had attempted to score a diving header.

United defender Lisandro Martinez was positioned between the two City players, but officials deemed that Fernandez had not interfered with play after failing to make contact with the ball. It was initially ruled offside, but VAR official Matt Donohue instructed referee Michael Oliver to award the goal, with Haaland played onside by Patrick Dorgu.

A Pro Ref spokesperson said: “The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position. In the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball, which makes any offside offence subjective; however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review.

“Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.”

Earlier in the season, United benefited from a controversial incident in their win over newly-promoted Ipswich Town. The Reds triumphed 5-2 at Old Trafford, but the club’s second goal proved contentious as the ball struck Harry Maguire’s arm in the build-up.

A handball offence by the goal scorer would have seen Maguire’s effort chalked off. However, as his shot was heading off target and was deflected in by Ipswich’s Jacob Greaves, the goal was allowed to stand and helped United reclaim a 2-1 lead.

Jarred Gillett was on VAR duty for the game and informed referee Craig Pawson: “It’s an own goal and the accidental handball is not punishable. So, we recommend you award the goal.”

The following week, United were denied a penalty for a challenge on Matheus Cunha in their draw with Everton. An impressive run from Marcus Rashford helped work the ball to Cunha in the box, who went down from James Tarkowski’s last-gasp challenge, but Sky Sports pundit Lee Hendrie agreed with referee John Brooks’ decision not to award a spot kick.

“Tarkowski gets enough on the ball, and he does…just,” Hendrie said. “The penalty has been checked, and it’s cleared. It’s a brilliant tackle.

Advertisement

“This angle shows more, he just gets complete purchase on the ball. Is Cunha looking for it? Tell you what, it is a risky one but it’s well worth it. It’s outstanding defending from Tarkowski.”