Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Sports

Ukrainian tennis star’s mental abuse lawsuit against WTA over Russian players dismissed

Published

on

A US judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by Ukrainian tennis player Lesia Tsurenko, who accused the WTA Tour and its former chief executive, Steve Simon, of inflicting mental abuse.

The legal action stemmed from the organization’s handling of Russian and Belarusian players following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Ms Tsurenko, once a top-25 player, alleged that the WTA failed to uphold a promise made by Mr Simon to ban Russian and Belarusian players who supported the war. She also claimed the tour did not prohibit “conduct detrimental” to the integrity of the game.

The 36-year-old cited specific instances, including a Russian player wearing a patch for a sanctioned Russian oil company.

She further stated that Mr Simon had told her it was “OK” for others to support the conflict.

Advertisement
Tsurenko said she had to pull out of a 2023 match against Belarus’ Aryna Sabalenka (pictured) after having a ‘panic attack’
Tsurenko said she had to pull out of a 2023 match against Belarus’ Aryna Sabalenka (pictured) after having a ‘panic attack’ (Getty)

Ms Tsurenko recounted suffering a “panic attack” that led her to withdraw from a match against Belarusian player Aryna Sabalenka, now the world’s number one female player, at the 2023 BNP Paribas tournament in Indian Wells, California.

However, in a decision issued on Wednesday, US District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in Manhattan ruled that the WTA was best placed to determine what constituted detrimental conduct.

Judge Buchwald concluded that Ms Tsurenko had not demonstrated that the organization had a duty to ban players or to ensure the game was free from emotional abuse.

“When courts have found that sports associations owe a duty to their players, those duties relate to ensuring players’ physical safety, not their emotional wellbeing,” Judge Buchwald wrote.

The judge also noted that the WTA had employed “reasoned decision making” in the wake of the invasion, including prohibiting players from competing under the flags of Russia and Belarus.

Advertisement

Ms Tsurenko had sought damages for breach of contract and negligence, including the infliction of emotional distress. Lawyers for both Ms Tsurenko and the WTA did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday.

In their defence seeking dismissal, the WTA stated they had consistently condemned Russia’s actions and taken significant steps to support Ukrainian players.

They also argued that, like many sports leagues, the WTA believes individual athletes “should not be punished because of the actions of their countries’ governments.”

Ms Tsurenko has frequently spoken out about the considerable challenges of competing on the professional tour since the invasion began.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

IPL Teams To Be Worth Rs 47000 Crore: Owner’s Declaration After RCB, RR Sale

Published

on

IPL 2026: File photo of KKR co-owner Shahrukh Khan and Virat Kohli© BCCI




Advertisement

The mega valuation that Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) and Rajasthan Royals (RR) generated as they changed hands ahead of the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026 has seen the world take note of the T20 competition. A consortium led by the Aditya Birla Group (ABG) on Tuesday acquired a 100 percent equity stake in RCB for a whopping USD 1.78 billion (approximately Rs 16,706 crore) from its current owner, United Spirits Limited. RR was acquired by a US-based Kal Somani-led consortium for USD 1.63 billion (approximately Rs 15,290 crore). The Somani-led consortium includes Rob Walton from the Walmart family and the Hamp family (Ford Motor Company). Combined, the teams are now valued at over Rs 31,000 crore.

Delhi Capitals co-owner Parth Jindal believes the valuation will only rise in the coming years. His bold declaration is that each team will be worth USD 4 to 5 billion (Rs 37,600 crore to Rs 47,000 crore) in the next decade.

“In both the deals, whether it was Rajasthan Royals or RCB, it was an unbelievable valuation. I entered the IPL in 2019 when I took a 50 percent stake in the then Delhi Daredevils, which is now the Delhi Capitals. I had a tough time convincing my father that we should spend Rs 550 crore for a 50 percent stake. Now I look like a genius,” Parth Jindal said at a forum.

“When the last media rights went for Rs 50,000 crore, that was the moment IPL truly arrived. The viewership numbers are there for all to see. If any media company wants to play in India, they have to play the IPL. If any brand wants to play in India and gain visibility, they have to play the IPL. The advent of the WPL was a watershed moment for the sport. The thing about sports is that it is almost seen as a safe asset today. Today, consistency in viewership can only be achieved through the IPL; hence it has become a very attractive property. This is a scarce asset, and there are only 10 IPL teams. Everybody would want a piece of it. I won’t be surprised if each IPL team in the next decade is worth USD 4 to 5 billion.”

Advertisement

The mega deal for RCB from the consortium – which also includes Blackstone’s perpetual private equity strategy, BXPE (with Viral Patel as CEO), Bolt Ventures owned by American investor David Blitzer, and media conglomerate Times of India – makes it the costliest IPL team ever.

Topics mentioned in this article

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Blue Jays talk 2026 season (home)

Published

on

Blue Jays talk 2026 season (home)

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

“It’s something that we also spoke about in the captains’ meeting”- Shubman Gill expresses unhappiness over major rule in IPL 2026

Published

on

Gujarat Titans captain Shubman Gill did not hold back while giving his opinion on the Impact Player rule in IPL. The GT skipper said that he does not like the rule because in his view, the Impact Player takes the skill out of the game and makes it a more batter-friendly sport.

At the pre-season press conference of Gujarat Titans in Ahmedabad, Shubman Gill was asked about his thoughts on the Impact Player rule. Ahead of IPL 2026, reports surfaced claiming that a few captains were not happy with the existing Impact Player rule.

It seems like Gill was one of those few names because here’s what he had to say about the Impact Player rule:

“Personally for me, I don’t think there should be Impact Player. I think cricket in general is an 11-player game, and on wickets where we play, on the grounds that we play, adding an extra batsman is, I think, it takes the skill out of the game.”

Gill further commented that chasing 160 or 180 without an Impact Player on tricky pitches leads to more exciting matches than the ones where 220-240 are chased down easily on flat decks with an Impact Player. He thought the Impact Player rule made the game more one-dimensional.

“So I mean it’s going to be there till 2027, it’s something that we also spoke about in the captains’ meeting yesterday,” Gill added.

Impact Player rule was introduced in the year 2023. Since then, the run rate in IPL matches has increased significantly, with teams chasing down 200+ targets successfully without breaking much sweat.

“I don’t like it that much”- Shubman Gill gives his honest take on the Impact Player rule

At the same press conference, Shubman Gill said that although the Impact Player rule makes the game more entertaining for the spectators, he does not it like it much.

Advertisement

“I understand it makes the game bit more entertaining but let’s see, it’s there, it’s up to them what the BCCI is going to take their decision but personally I don’t like it that much,” Shubman Gill concluded.

The Impact Player rule is here to stay in IPL 2026. It will be interesting to see how captain Gill uses the Impact Player while leading the Gujarat Titans in IPL matches this year.