Tech & AI
iPhone 18 Pro Max cameras are Apple’s best yet, but marginally
I’m in the bag for iPhone Duo, but I wanted to test out an iPhone 18 Pro Max camera system before going all in on Apple’s foldable. Here’s what I learned as I prepare for a potential camera downgrade.
I would love nothing more than to travel to some remote part of the planet and detail exactly how iPhone 18 Pro Max performs while showing off incredible one-of-a-kind photos. That isn’t what I’m here to do today.
My simple goal is to explain exactly what I have observed about Apple’s latest camera system, coming from the iPhone 17 Pro Max, and what buying an iPhone Duo might mean losing out on.
The iPhone 18 Pro Max showcases exactly what makes Apple’s smartphone camera such a well-balanced and all-around great camera system. It’s yet another pinnacle in years of slight improvements.
Photos captured on both iPhones are in the Bright Photographic Style at about -40 tone and +38 color.
Point and shoot
I’ve got my trusty Sony a7II from 2014 that continues to produce amazing results straight from the sensor, RAW or not. I always shoot full manual with that camera and have no interest in the automatic settings.
So, it might be odd to say that I behave exactly the opposite on iPhone. For years, I downloaded the pro-level camera apps, tinkered with my workflow, edited every image to death — it was a tad exhausting at times.
There had to be a better way.
I wanted more control and a more unique look to my photos than what capturing straight from the iPhone camera could give me. Editing and filters often felt overprocessed and unrealistic.
I wanted to capture photos quickly and easily without fiddling with all those little digital dials and settings. I also wanted a workflow that was non-destructive and easily changed later.
Apple gave me exactly what I wanted with Photographic Styles. The fully-reversible non-destructive shooting modes that could be preset and forget transformed how I approached mobile photography.
My big camera still sits at full manual and offers me control when I want it. My iPhone, on the other hand, is basically full auto with custom Photographic Styles.
I stopped shooting Apple ProRAW except in circumstances where I specifically knew I’d like more editing control. Photographic Styles are just that good.
The issue has never been about a lack of control, as that could be solved with third-party apps, it’s the lack of physical controls. Apple tried to solve this with the poorly-executed Camera Control, which ends up being too fiddly as anything more than a shutter button.
Apple is already showing signs of being done with Camera Control — the new pro camera tools aren’t even part of it. I expect it’ll be gone in a generation or two.
I’d love to see Apple make a physical camera with knobs and dials for each minute setting, but that isn’t going to happen. The iPhone is inherently a point-and-shoot experience, and I’m okay with that.
I’ll never complain about having more options for precise control, but they’re going to be used as an exception to the norm. Nearly every photo captured will be done with the press of a shutter and nothing else.
That’s the beauty of Photographic Styles. Take the photos you want now at whatever preset you’ve chosen and change them later as needed.
I like a camera that I can point and click the shutter, even my Sony a7II can function that way thanks to a back-button focus I have set up. I adjust the dials when needed, but most of the time I can set them and just capture photos until conditions change.
iPhone and Photographic Styles lets me do the same, if not even more efficiently. iPhone 18 Pro Max, however, is a step in the opposite direction in some cases.
Variable aperture is just fine, actually
Apple’s approach to variable aperture is likely one of necessity. The iPhone 18 Pro Max Main Fusion camera is f/1.48 fully open.
The problem is, until now, all iPhones shot photos fully open. There wasn’t a physical aperture to close and let in less light.
Previous recent models shot at around f/1.78, which produced a soft bokeh when close enough to the subject. The subject was still sharp while plenty of light was gathered — it was the perfect set point for something that couldn’t be changed.
Then arrives the f/1.48 sensor. It’s “better” in that it can let in more light, meaning faster shutter speeds and better ISO (less noise).
The problem is you definitely do not want to shoot at that level all the time. With this sensor, f/1.48 is at the edge of beginning to lose sharpness in the subject.
The iPhone 18 Pro Max will default to f/1.8 for most shots and automatically switch to f/1.48 in low-light settings. The f/2.8 setting is a bit sharper even if it lets in less light, while f/4.0 is the max and loses sharpness again.
You’ll use f/4.0 in the brightest of settings to ensure all faces are in focus in a cluster of people, for example. It’s also great in dimmer or complex lighting environments where the aperture creates a “star” wherever pinpoints of light are visible.
The star looks best at f/2.8 in my opinion, but some may not like them at all, as they are technically a flaw in the photo being captured. The star results from how bright light is shown on the sensor through the aperture blades.
I appreciate this level of control in my iPhone camera. That said, it does feel a bit fiddly.
I expect the friction and fiddly nature of variable aperture on iPhone will ultimately result in me relying on the automatic setting. I’m enthusiastic about it now in my testing, but I’m certain I’d only rarely choose to change that toggle.
The smallest of gains
After variable aperture, the first thing you’ll notice in a one-to-one comparison is how Photographic Styles has changed. It appears Apple has tweaked the pipeline and application values that result in slightly different, more refined looks versus the previous version.
Upon further investigation, there is also a difference in how the iPhone deals with white balance. There is a pro tool for choosing white balance compensation on iPhone 18 Pro Max, but it’s set to auto by default.
Whatever has changed with white balance behavior is noticeable in some light. It sometimes feels like an overcorrection, which is why you might want to use the manual control.
The available pro tools are great to have in the Apple Camera app. Shutter speed is something I love being able to control, as that is how you can get light trails in some situations.
Third-party apps can control these aspects of the iPhone camera, so that’s not exactly new. It’s a little weird that Apple doesn’t include the pro camera controls in iPhone Duo or other non-pro iPhones.
I think third-party apps will be the better place to control these aspects of iPhone photography. The only reason you might use the Camera app to control these aspects is if you still want access to Apple’s full camera pipeline.
Minus the pro camera controls I mentioned, all of this is coming to iPhone Duo. The new Photographic Styles, updated processing, and white balance differences will be present in Apple’s foldable.
In my previous camera spec breakdown, I found that the two most notable differences between iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone Duo will be the existence of an optical telephoto camera and variable aperture.
Nearly every other aspect is identical, which means iPhone Duo users shouldn’t be worried about having a “worse” camera experience. Funny enough, for me at least, there may not be that much difference.
What is gained, what will be lost
Like everyone else, I won’t have an iPhone Duo to test until October 23, so that aspect will have to wait for another day. For now, I can only address what I’ve learned about iPhone 18 Pro Max.
I wish I had more time with the iPhone 18 Pro Max, and I’m perfectly aware of my limited time, so take what I have to say here with that in mind.
From what I can tell without holding an iPhone Duo in hand, I believe my previous conclusion stands true: optical telephoto and variable aperture are all I’ll miss on iPhone Duo.
What I gain will be a foldable with new camera abilities like Smart Take and Duo FaceTime. Whether or not that’s an equivalent exchange will be determined at a later date.
Like with Apple Watch Ultra, I believe a lot of iPhone “Pro” features fall into aspirational purchase territory. It’s not that I don’t consider myself a “professional” photographer, or find iPhone’s pro controls too unwieldy, just that they’re unnecessary for most applications.
The variable aperture on iPhone 18 Pro Max doesn’t have enough range to capture photos like the fountain example above. The water looks like that on the Sony a7II because I could set the aperture to f/22 and allow very little light in during a longer exposure.
When I use my Sony a7II camera, I’m using it the same way a professional might by taking control of every aspect of each photo using the device’s physical controls. The interface and physicality of that camera leans into it being used as a professional tool.
When I shoot photos with my iPhone, I’m just pressing the shutter and letting the device do the rest. Photographic Styles give me enough control to ensure every photo I capture is uniquely mine, so I don’t feel the need to dive deeper into the settings.
Photographic Styles 3 with texture and grain options is available on iPhone Duo. Apple is not including pro controls, so no manual white balance, shutter speed, or access to a histogram will be available.
Here’s the thing, I don’t know that I’ll even notice or care. If I need control over those things, I can access them in third-party apps.
Sometimes you just need to take the damn photo
When I was testing iPhone 18 Pro Max as a camera, I noticed how much time I spent in menus selecting each little tool set point. I would take a couple of shots, then back to those menus.
The more photos I shot, the less time I spent adjusting anything manually. It was just too time-consuming to adjust aperture manually for each shot or worry about shutter speed.
As I’ve always inevitably learned with the iPhone, it is better to just point and shoot. If I want to have more control for a specific shot, there are third-party apps or Apple’s controls available.
Thanks to that mentality, it means my photo-shooting experience will be very similar on iPhone Duo. Even the variable aperture fades to the background since most photos are taken at f/1.8.
iPhone Duo will capture all photos at f/1.78.
The iPhone 18 Pro Max is Apple’s best camera system yet. It has the most options for manual control, includes an interesting variable aperture, and has the best image pipeline so far.
That variable aperture is interesting, and in a generation or two, it’ll be so good it’ll be hard to miss. Today, the gains provided by it are minimal, and only a good eye will spot the difference in most shots.
If you’re anything like me, there won’t be much to miss when choosing the iPhone Duo. It is still an iPhone camera system, and a powerful one at that with A20 Pro and Photographic Styles 3.
I have no doubt that future Apple foldables will have pro-level camera systems. Today, iPhone Duo doesn’t, which makes it a primary purchase decision between the two devices.
This write up was for the photography nerds like me. Most iPhone users won’t be able to spot the difference between shots on an iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro without being told what to look for.
That Charmander figure is softer and less defined here thanks to the iPhone’s f/1.48 wide open aperture.
It’s a big leap in performance and function, don’t get me wrong. However, even the big leaps only show through so much on an already amazing camera system.
For those just wondering how it compares with previous iPhone cameras, think of it this way: your iPhone is already the best camera you own. The only differences an upgrade will bring is better experiences at the fringes.
You’ll always capture pristine and beautiful photos in broad daylight. Dim and night photos will prove a challenge to even the best smartphone cameras, but Apple’s latest systems perform marginally better over previous ones.
iPhone 18 Pro Max is about control. However, I’m increasingly wondering how much control we actually need when the cameras are this good.
I’m glad the options are there, first or third-party, but it just goes to show how good the iPhone has become as a camera that the controls are almost unnecessary. I’m aware that these thoughts might reflect my own journey as a photographer more than what is true of Apple’s offering, so your miles may vary.
The thing is, I don’t feel this way about my dedicated camera. It’s more akin to using a record player — deliberate and thoughtful.
When I pull out my Sony camera, I’m setting out on a photographic journey to accomplish a shot I’m envisioning using the controls in my hands. When I pull out my iPhone, I’m looking to capture a moment or a memory in an instant.
I matched the Sony’s settings with the result from the iPhone, which produced a dimmer shot. That’s mostly due to the exposure stacking iPhone performs with every shot.
Each of these devices serves different purposes and reaches different goals. When photographing people, the big camera draws attention, for better or for worse, and changes the environment you’re photographing by the nature of the device.
The iPhone can show up and not draw anyone’s eye, though I’m sure that’ll be an issue for the iPhone Duo for a time. In any case, there’s something more fleeting and unserious about capturing an iPhone photo.
Into the corn maze
I’m over 2.3k words into this, so I’ll keep this bit short. I spent a day at a pumpkin patch with my friends recently and had three cameras on my person — iPhone 17 Pro Max, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and Sony a7II.
I took about 80 keepable photos and some video during the day, with about 39 on my Sony a7II. The sun was too bright and over-exposing everything, so it was a challenging shooting day for full-manual controls.
Nearly every other photo was taken on the iPhone 17 Pro Max, and zero with the telephoto camera. I wanted to reserve the iPhone 18 Pro Max, deliberately, for situations I thought called for that specific device.
None arose, though I did capture a spatial video in the corn maze with it.
There are a few photos I really like from the iPhone, as they captured casual situations more easily. A few exemplified the speed at which I could get a photo when using an iPhone versus a larger camera.
Nearly all of my favorite shots came from the Sony a7II. Not just because it is a superior full-frame camera with a powerful lens, but because they felt more deliberate.
I took the time to compensate for lighting whether we were in the sun or shade, using the easy-to-use controls on the camera. Adjusting these things on the fly was intuitive and simple compared to the digital touch interface of an iPhone.
Some shots were a bit out of focus or had motion blurring where the iPhone wouldn’t have allowed it. However, there’s something I can’t quite put my finger on that separates the “quality” of the two images.
Of course, no smartphone can truly compete with a full-frame camera. There is a reason professionals still buy them over simply shooting with an iPhone for everything.
That’s the point I’m reaching for, though I’m not sure I’m conveying it well. Apple wants iPhone 18 Pro Max to reflect the performance and control of a high-end full-frame camera, but falls short due to a lack of dedicated physical controls and sensor size.
Physics will always win in this contest. There isn’t space for good physical camera controls on iPhone, nor is there room for larger sensors.
My point is, pros will always choose the bigger camera when possible. However, the power of the iPhone is that it is always on your person, therefore winning as the best camera for that reason.
Though, because of the physical limitations of a smartphone, I think it makes more sense to lean into automatic settings and systems like Photographic Styles. It’s great more control is available to those that need it, but very few people will.
I wouldn’t mind seeing more accessories for iPhone that bring pro-level physical controls to iPhone. Apple should build more APIs to allow that, but that’s a conversation for another day.
To bring this thing to a close, I’ll share this: iPhone 18 Pro Max is amazing, and in some ways, better even than the iPhone 17 Pro Max I still possess. However, iPhone cameras have gotten so good that simply getting the shot and worrying about the details later is the way to go in 99% of situations.
The iPhone Duo will get Photographic Styles 3 with texture and grain control, so I’ll dive more into that when I’m testing the foldable. I can already tell that I’ll love grain when it is warranted, but it can be too aggressive at times.
I’m glad I took the time to test out the iPhone 18 Pro Max cameras myself. I can now say quite confidently that even as good as the upgrades are, they’re ones I can and will live without.
Next up, iPhone Duo as a camera. If my assumptions are right, the only thing I will truly miss is the optical telephoto 4x camera and the lack of spatial video capture support.
I have zero doubt iPhone Duo will capture photos just as good as iPhone 18 Pro Max in most day-to-day situations. I’ll share those experiences later in October.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login