A new national AI strategy puts sovereignty front and centre as Canada moves to reduce its dependence on foreign cloud and AI providers.
On Wednesday, the European Commission launched its Technological Sovereignty Package, introducing new legislation to loosen the grip of US Big Tech on European cloud and AI infrastructure. Now Canada has followed suit with its own ‘AI for All’ strategy, built around six pillars and with the explicit goal of ensuring Canadians can “adopt, build and govern AI on their own terms”.
“We will strengthen Canadian sovereignty at a time when it is being deeply challenged,” the strategy states, in a clear reference to tense relations with its neighbours under the Trump administration.
“Too much Canadian innovation is captured and scaled elsewhere,” the strategy reads. “In an era where prosperity, resilience and sovereignty increasingly depend on the ability to build and govern AI on national terms, these are vulnerabilities Canada cannot leave unaddressed.”
Advertisement
The strategy, published yesterday (4 June), points to some of those “vulnerabilities” that Canada needs to address. Sovereign compute capacity is described as “nascent”, with Canadian organisations remaining heavily reliant on foreign providers for the infrastructure underpinning economic, scientific and public-sector activity.
GPU chip fabrication sits “almost entirely offshore”, and only 12pc of Canadian businesses currently use AI – well behind Nordic counterparts, the strategy claims, where adoption runs between 29 and 42pc. The strategy’s six pillars cover:
safety and democracy protections
AI skills and literacy for all Canadians
accelerated adoption across the economy
building sovereign compute infrastructure
scaling Canadian AI champions
forging trusted international alliances
On infrastructure, the Canadian government is committing to building a world-leading supercomputer by 2031 and growing sovereign cloud capacity to reduce dependence on foreign providers, echoing the EU’s CADA (Cloud and AI Development Act) proposals published on Wednesday.
Canada aims to increase business AI adoption from 12pc today to 60pc by 2034, create up to 250,000 new jobs through AI adoption by 2031, and create nearly $200bn in GDP gains from labour productivity improvements.
Priority sectors for investment will be: health and life sciences; energy and natural resources; transportation; agriculture; and manufacturing and robotics.
Advertisement
The strategy flags that Canada has already signed 20 new economic and defence international partnerships in the past year, 11 of which advance AI cooperation. The Canadian government said it will build a strategic multilateral alliance to move “from reliance to resilience” in key AI and technology capabilities.
For children and its citizens in general, the Canadian strategy commits to modernising privacy legislation, introducing online safety laws and providing free AI literacy training to 1m entry-level, post-secondary students.
Canada’s strategy and the EU’s sovereignty package this week are clear signs that the race to reduce dependence on a small number of US technology giants is now a mainstream policy priority on both sides of the Atlantic.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
They describe the feat as “a far cry from designer babies, but nevertheless a step in that direction.”
Dieter Egli, an associate professor of developmental cell biology at Columbia University and his co-authors, including Nathan Treff of Nucleus Genomics, a New York-based DNA-testing startup, say the technology could help fix disease-causing mutations in embryos. “We’re not throwing the final ‘OK, you will have gene-edited babies tomorrow’ at the public,” said Egli. “That is a process that can occur through discussion matched with scientific progress….”
Previous gene-editing efforts have often used Crispr, which can cut out parts of the DNA sequence, but the technology can also cause damage if the wrong DNA is targeted or cut out. In 2018, Chinese scientist He Jianku said he used Crispr to tweak DNA in human embryos and was imprisoned for the work. The technology Egli’s group used, called base editing, allows them to target individual DNA letters in sequences more precisely with fewer adverse effects… Egli’s group focused on altering two genes, one that can raise the risk of heart disease and one that is tied to blood disorders like sickle cell disease, and the research showed they were sometimes able to do so successfully, in the same embryo, without damage.
Advertisement
“I am generally supportive of the concept of embryo editing to prevent genetic disease,” said Dr. Paula Amato, a fertility expert at Oregon Health & Science University who wasn’t involved in the research… Base editing has been used in human embryos before, according to peer-reviewed studies. The technology was used to correct a disease-causing mutation and an Alzheimer’s disease-risk gene variant, said Alexis Komor, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biophysics at the University of California, San Diego, who wasn’t involved in the work. “There really is not any unmet medical or clinical need for this, especially from an in vitro fertilization perspective,” Komor said. “Usually what you’ll hear is that they’re doing it just so that you know we can prevent genetic diseases, but there are so many other better ways to do that.”
Using embryo editing to create babies is illegal in the U.S. and many other countries. Scientists have long worried that it is a slippery slope and that the technology could ultimately be used to promote eugenics. Her worry is that “they’re basically building a blueprint” for more ethically problematic forms of embryo editing.
“In my opinion, I think this is a huge no-no,” Komor said. “There’s just no ethical way to use this….”
Nucleus Genomics Chief Executive Kian Sadeghi said his company plans to fund Egli’s further research, building on the new findings. His company sells a polygenic embryo-screening product, which screens prospective parents’ embryos and produces risk scores for their likelihood of developing disease, as well as factors like height, IQ and eye color. The company has said the IQ predictions are limited in accuracy. The research was published online Monday on a preprint server.
The Galaxy S26 Ultra is the most complete Android phone I’ve used this year. It doesn’t get there with a single headline feature, though. Instead, it wins the crown by being good at almost everything and then topping it off with its own exclusive set of perks. At $1,300, it’s also undeniably expensive. After four months of using it as my only phone, I don’t think anything else in the Android segment comes close to its breadth. Samsung dropped the titanium frame this time for a lighter, more colorful Armor Aluminum one, and it finally rounded off the corners that used to bite into my palm.
The headline addition is the Privacy Display, baked into the hardware rather than slapped on as a film. It hides the screen from whoever’s sitting next to you. I was skeptical until I used it and got some surprised looks from the people around me. Underneath the glass-and-metal kit sits the customized Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 silicon, which finally pulls level with Apple’s silicon inside iPhones. Whether it’s heavy multitasking, on-device AI through Gemini, or camera capture, all of it ran without a stutter in my time with the phone.
It’s not perfect, though. The battery is still 5,000 mAh, the same as the last few Ultras, and the screen-on time reflects that. It’s respectable, but nothing special. The faster 60W wired charging takes some of the sting out, at least. The cameras get wider apertures and much better low-light results. Futhermore, the Horizon Lock video mode genuinely impressed me, but I still hit the odd exposure wobble and some shutter lag. The bottom line is that the Galaxy S26 Ultra is an unapologetic powerhouse. It won’t drag S25 Ultra owners into an upgrade charm, but for just about everyone else, it’s a masterclass.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra specs: What’s inside this sleek flagship?
Processor
Octa-Core (4.74 GHz, 3.6 GHz)
Display
17.49 cm Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120 x 1440 (Quad HD+), 16M Colour Depth, 120 Hz Max Refresh Rate
5000 mAh (Non-removable), Up to 31 hours video playback time
Audio & Video
Stereo Support, Video Playback Resolution up to UHD 8K (7680 x 4320) @ 60fps
Software Support
Security Updates valid until 28 February 2033
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra design and build: A deceptively sleek behemoth
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Every smartphone label is chasing titanium these days, so Samsung going back to aluminum reads like a step backward on paper. It isn’t. After living with the Armor Aluminum 2 frame, I’m convinced the swap was the right call. For one, aluminum takes anodization far better than the PVD coating titanium needs, which is why the colors here pop the way they do.
You get Cobalt Violet (the one I tested, and the one Samsung wants you to buy as the signature color this year), Sky Blue, White, Black, and two Samsung-exclusive shades, Silver Shadow and Pink Gold. The other reason is heat. Aluminum dissipates it a lot quicker than titanium. I learned that lesson the hard way with the iPhone 16 Pro.
Advertisement
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Paired with the vapor chamber, the aluminum chassis on the Samsung flagship kept the phone from getting toasty under stress, but more on that later. I noticed it most during a marathon evening of editing a trip video on the phone, the kind of workflow that usually leaves a metal phone warm enough to be unpleasant. This one stayed merely warm.
The ergonomics get better. Phew!
Samsung finally fixed my biggest pet peeve about its top-end phones. Those sharp, palm-digging corners are finally gone. The rounded edges on the S26 Ultra are subtle, but it changes how the phone feels in the hand entirely. It feels thinner and easier to manage one-handed, and after a week, I stopped reaching instinctively for a case, which I never did with the last Ultra.
The camera array still juts out about half a centimeter, though, so the phone rocks around on a desk if you tap at it lying flat without a case. That’s the one ergonomic compromise that hasn’t budged in years, and I doubt it’s going to change in the near future due to the ever-upgrading imaging hardware.
Durability and ingress protection
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Up front, you’ll find Corning’s Gorilla Armor 2 layer, which mixes in ceramic for better drop resistance and glare reduction. The back is Gorilla Glass Victus 2. I didn’t deliberately drop the phone, because it isn’t mine to destroy, but it picked up exactly zero micro-scratches over a few months of being tossed into bags alongside keys and a charging brick, which is more than I can say for plenty of phones I’ve tested.
One aspect worth flagging is the durability. The Galaxy S26 Ultra holds its IP68 rating, which means it’s good for accidental dips in 1.5m of water for 30 minutes. It’s not the best out there, by the way. A handful of Chinese rivals are already shipping IP69 and IP69K ratings for high-pressure water resistance, which means they can shrug off hot, pressurized jets, not just a dunk in a sink.
The OnePlus 15 is one of those phones, and it pulls off the durability stunt without compromising the looks. Samsung is being conservative. For most people, IP68 is plenty, and the build still feels rock solid in the hand, but it’s a spec sheet line where Samsung is no longer leading the pack.
Advertisement
The S Pen experience
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The S Pen lives in the bottom-left corner inside its own silo. It’s a touch thinner this year, with a curved end that sits flush against the new frame. Functionally, however, it hasn’t changed much since Samsung pulled back the Bluetooth tricks. There’s no more air-gesture remote-shutter party trick to enjoy, and it’s worth mourning.
I rarely used it, so I won’t pretend that it’s a huge miss for me. It’s still the best stylus on any phone by a far margin. The latency is effectively zero, and that held up whether I was scribbling notes in a meeting, sketching a rough idea, or nudging a slider in the photo editor where the fine control genuinely matters.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
I love the fact that it can kick into action right from the lock screen, offering you a natural canvas for jotting down notes without having to go through the whole fingerprint scan or password input hassle.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra display: Two steps forward, one step back
The screen on the Galaxy S26 Ultra is a gorgeous 6.9-inch flat Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel with QHD+ (3120 x 1440 pixels at 500 ppi) resolution and a refresh rate that ramps from 1Hz all the way to 120Hz. Peak HDR brightness hits 2,600 nits, so I never once squinted at it outdoors.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Plus, there’s an anti-reflective Gorilla Armor 2 coating on top. I spent an afternoon shooting and reviewing photos under a harsh midday sun. Ordinarily, that kind of light turns most smartphone screens into mirrors, especially with the dark mode UI. The Galaxy S26 Ultra did a much better job and stayed legible throughout the exercise.
Let’s talk about that Privacy Display
This is the real story of the S26 Ultra. Forget the cheap stick-on privacy films that dilute the image clarity. Samsung built this in at the sub-pixel level, interlacing normal wide-viewing OLED pixels with narrow-beam pixel arrays. The way it works is straightforward in practice, even if the engineering is clever.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
As you switch it on, the wide pixels shut off, so anyone peering in from more than 45 degrees off-axis sees a murky near-black panel, while you, looking at it straight, see everything as normal. There are a bunch of granular controls, too. You can leave it on all the time, or pin it to specific triggers, so it kicks in automatically for banking apps, WhatsApp, or just incoming notification pop-ups and nothing else.
In day-to-day use, it was the feature I didn’t know I wanted. On a crowded metro train, I caught myself replying to messages I’d normally have left until I got home, because I was no longer worried about the person packed against my shoulder peeking at them. It’s the rare phone feature that actually changed my behavior rather than just sitting in a settings menu.
Advertisement
It’s not all sunshine and rainbows, though
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Privacy Display is a meaningful trick, but Samsung’s choices come with three caveats that I kept noticing. The first is viewing angles. Even with privacy mode off, that interlaced pixel structure leaves the Ultra with slightly narrower natural viewing angles than the cheaper S26 and S26+. You’ll only really see it if you hand the phone to someone and you’re both trying to watch from the side.
The second is contrast. Once you set Privacy Display to Maximum Privacy mode, the brightness output and color contrast take a visible hit. Those signature inky AMOLED blacks start looking a little gray, as a result. It’s a fair loss for the privacy and display convenience, but it is still a trade-off you must learn to live with.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
And finally, despite some confusing early claims, this is an 8-bit display leaning on FRC to fake 10-bit color output. Most people will never catch any banding in normal use, and I had to go looking in test gradients to spot it. But on a $1,300 phone in 2026, an 8-bit panel is going to bother the purists, and they’re not wrong to expect more at this price. There’s also no high-frequency PWM dimming, so if you’re sensitive to OLED flicker, low brightness might tire your eyes over a long evening of reading in the dark.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra camera: Legacy preserved with extra oomph
Alright, let’s discuss the soul of the Galaxy S26 Ultra. The quad-camera layout looks familiar, but the aperture and processing changes here add up to real gains, especially after dark. This is also the section where I spent the most time, because cameras are where flagship phones either justify their price or quietly don’t, and Samsung’s Galaxy S Ultra has always marketed itself as the phone you leave the real camera at home for.
Main (Wide)
200 MP
f/1.4 (up from f/1.7)
1/1.3″
0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
Ultrawide
50 MP
f/1.9
1/2.5″
120˚ FOV, dual pixel PDAF
Telephoto 1 (3x)
10 MP
f/2.4
1/3.94″
67mm equivalent, OIS
Telephoto 2 (5x)
50 MP
f/2.9 (up from f/3.4)
1/2.52″
111mm equivalent, ALoP design, OIS
Front (Selfie)
12 MP
f/2.2
1/3.2″
Wider 23mm FOV, dual pixel PDAF
Let’s start where it counts, because the 200MP main sensor is doing the heavy lifting on this phone, and Samsung has clearly poured its energy into it. The headline change is the jump to an f/1.4 aperture, up from f/1.7 on the S25 Ultra, and that’s not a marketing number you should glide past. A wider aperture pulls in more light, which matters enormously the moment the sun goes down.
I’ll start with the low-light situation. In the image below, you can see what the camera viewfinder shows your eyes, and what the image sensors actually capture in a dark room:
Advertisement
Just look at the sheer level of color details the camera extracted in an utterly dark room.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
In good daylight, honestly, the gap between this and last year’s Ultra is hard to see, because there’s plenty of light to go around and Samsung’s processing was already excellent. The 200MP sensor pixel-bins down to a default 12MP shot that’s clean, detailed, and well-saturated. If you switch to the full 200MP mode for a static, well-lit scene, the amount of detail you can crop into is genuinely absurd.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The only trade-off is that the 12MP pixel-binned shots turn out a tad sharper, while the full 200MP clicks are a bit noisy and lose out on finer surface details. Otherwise, with steady hands, the 50MP and 200MP modes can deliver some terrific results. I shot a building facade across a plaza and could pull a legible street sign out of a corner of the frame that I couldn’t even read with my own eyes from where I stood.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Where the f/1.4 lens earns its keep is in the in-between hours. Indoor restaurant lighting, an overcast street at dusk, or a living room lit by a couple of lamps, that’s the territory where last year’s phones started smearing detail and lifting noise, and it’s where the Galaxy S26 Ultra shines. Shadow detail that used to dissolve into mush stays intact, and the phone doesn’t lean as hard on its noise reduction.
Night capture
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Samsung loves the word “Nightography,” and I went in ready to roll my eyes at it. I’ll give credit where it’s due, though, because the f/1.4 main lens combined with the new processing produced the cleanest phone night shots I’ve taken on a phone in years. And yeah, it does a noticeably better job than the iPhone 17 Pro, both in terms of color realism and surface details.
Left: Galaxy S26 Ultra. Right: iPhone 17 ProNadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
City skylines came out cleaner, with the bright points of distant windows staying crisp instead of blooming into colored halos. I took the phone out to shoot a stretch of road lit only by sodium streetlamps, the kind of orange-cast scene that throws off the white balance. The Galaxy S26 Ultra handled it more accurately than I expected, keeping the tarmac a believable gray rather than dunking the whole frame in a warm coat.
Left: Galaxy S26 Ultra. Right: iPhone 17 ProNadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
On a reasonably dark night outside the city, the dedicated astro mode stacked a long exposure and pulled out a genuinely respectable field of stars, with far less of the smeary, watercolor-sky effect these modes used to produce. It’s not replacing a tripod-mounted mirrorless camera and a fast prime anytime soon, and I wouldn’t pretend otherwise, but as a phone you happen to have in your pocket when the sky is clear, it punches well above its weight class.
Zoom, telephoto, and the 5x macro problem
A 5x telephoto click of my cat.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The two telephoto lenses are where the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s ambition really shows. The 3x lens is the one I reached for most without thinking, because it sits at the natural portrait length, and it renders faces with flattering compression and minimal distortion. The 5x lens is the showpiece, and Samsung pushed its aperture wider this time around, which again pays off after dark.
When the zoom does a good job.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The phone will push out to 100x Space Zoom, and as always, that mode is a party trick more than a useful tool, fine for reading a far-off sign but a mushy, AI-smoothed mess for anything you’d actually want to keep. I tried my best with long-range clicks of pets and nature, and the surface texture turned out pretty hazy and just messed up.
When the zoom does a shoddy job.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There is one real catch with the 5x lens, and it’s worth understanding before you buy. To slim the telephoto module down, Samsung went with an ALoP design on the bigger zoom camera. The upside is that you get a gorgeous bokeh effect, the kind of soft background separation that makes portraits truly shine. The downside is that at this range, the phone hunts for focus far more than I’d like.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
If you like shooting tight detail shots, a flower, a watch face, a plate of food, you’ll find the 5x backing away from you, and you’ll end up on the main sensor’s macro mode instead. It’s a quirk, not a dealbreaker, but it vexed me in the early days until I adjusted my instincts. Also, the color chemistry of the macro shots is slightly different, leaning towards a warmer color cast, so that’s worth keeping in mind.
The highs, lows, and the stuff that irked me
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The front camera lands a wider frame on the Galaxy S26 Ultra, which doesn’t sound like much until you’re squeezing three friends into a frame. Without a selfie stick, that extra bit of width is the difference between everyone fitting and someone losing half their head. Details are good, skin tones are handled well, and the wider field makes it a better travel companion for group shots in front of something you actually want in the background.
You can create a custom filter in the camera app using existing images. It’s lovely.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
On color accuracy, Samsung has finally reined in its old habit of cranking up the saturation way beyond realism. For years, Samsung’s phones would hand you skies that were a little too blue and grass that looked a tad too green. It was flattering at a glance but not realistic. This year, skin tones and white balance stayed accurate across all kinds of lighting in my shots. It’s a more grown-up and mature look, and I prefer it.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Now, on to the less flattering parts. In tricky high-contrast scenes, exposure sometimes drifted between back-to-back shots, so I’d fire off three frames of the same subject and find one noticeably brighter than the others for no obvious reason. More frustrating is the low-light shutter lag. Below a certain threshold, there’s a real 0.5 to 1.5 second capture delay, and it cost me a couple of shots of a moving subject I’d genuinely have liked to keep.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The feature I keep showing people, though, is Super Steady Horizon Lock. It leans on the gyroscope and EIS, letting you spin the phone a full 360 degrees while recording, and the horizon just stays put. It’s uncanny. I moved the phone around like a waving soccer fan in my kitchen to test its limits, and the footage came back looking like it was shot on a gimbal. It went meaningfully further than Apple’s Action Mode in my side-by-side comparison. For anyone shooting handheld action, a kid’s football match, a bike ride, or a concert, it’s the kind of perk that turns unusable footage into something you’d actually post.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra performance: Fast and hot
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The Galaxy S26 Ultra draws power from the customized Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy silicon. It’s based on the 3nm process, tagging alongside fast UFS 4.0 storage and either 12GB or 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM to go with it. There’s a lot of performance headroom here, and in normal use I never came close to running out of it.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Apps snap open, the camera is ready the instant I raise the phone, and I never once watched it stutter while switching between a dozen open apps. Android chips have trailed Apple on raw core performance for years, and the gap was the stick Apple fans loved to beat Android with. The Oryon V3 cores in the Elite Gen 5 close that gap, and it reflects in the Geekbench benchmark scores.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There’s a bigger vapor chamber in here this time, and the phone never got uncomfortably hot while I used it. Games such as Zenless Zone Zero and Diablo Immortal worked without any stutters. The trade-off is how it gets to the performance summit. As I pushed it hard with titles like Genshin Impact, the throttling became visible with lowered FPS output, all done to keep the surface cool.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
You can see it in the numbers. The phone posts a chart-topping tally on the demanding 3DMark tests, and then drops aggressively down to nearly half its peak performance after a sustained 20-minute run. Even throttled, that ties the iPhone’s sustained score and leaves the Pixel 10 Pro XL far behind.
Running the CPU throttle test, the phone fared even worse in terms of sustained performance drop. I have seen devices like the Red Magic 11 Pro fare much better. In practice, that means a long gaming session gets a little less smooth after the first twenty minutes, but never to the point where it becomes annoying or drops too many frames to ruin the experience.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra software: Loaded with AI
The Galaxy S26 Ultra ships running Android 16 with One UI 8.5 layer on top. Notably, Samsung is matching Google’s seven years of major OS and security updates promises, which carry the phone through to 2033. That’s a long tail of support, and it’s a huge reassurance if you’re a person who sticks with their phone until it falls apart.
Before we dig into the AI side of the debate, One UI itself isn’t bad. Far from it. DeX is still one of the best implementations of a desktop-like work environment bundled with an Android phone. Moreover, Good Lock offers the deepest level of customization on a smartphone without having to flash a ROM or install sketchy apps. The design is familiar, but after seeing the same familiar UI for years, it could use some jazzing up at this point in time.
The AI ecosystem
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There are a lot of AI engines stacked on top of each other here. It can feel like too much at first, and there’s a real argument that Samsung has thrown everything at the wall to see what sticks. Once you figure out where everything lives, though, you can get some genuine utility out of it. The most interesting piece is agentic AI through Gemini. It doesn’t just answer you. Instead, it can go act inside third-party apps, ordering your usual off DoorDash or booking an airport Uber.
It’s still a beta experience, and it shows. It’s slow, and you often have to sit and watch it tap through the app before it hands you a final confirm button, which rather defeats the point of automation. Still, you can see where this is all going, and it’s the first time I’ve used a phone feature that felt like a preview of the next few years rather than a gimmick of this one.
Advertisement
Bixby, meanwhile, isn’t just an alarm-setter anymore. Samsung wired in Perplexity, so it can field genuinely complex real-time questions and cite where the answers came from, which makes it actually trustworthy in a way Bixby never has been.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The Photo Assist and Creative Studio tools let you tweak a photo, recolor a shirt, or sketch something rough with the S Pen and have the AI turn it into a watercolor, a 3D render, or an oil painting. They’re fun, occasionally useful, and exactly the sort of thing you’ll show someone once and then forget about. But they also tend to misfire, as you can see in the sample images below.
The misfires
Using AI to move around objects can produce funny results.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Samsung is pushing the Galaxy S26 Ultra as an AI-native phone, and as such, it has crammed it into nearly every corner of the software experience, but not all of it works. Now Brief stacks weather, calendar, and news into a lock-screen widget, but I never got more out of it than the widgets we’ve already had for a decade.
I asked the AI to remove humans. It did a good job, but even removed a vehicle, or two.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Now Nudge is supposed to read what’s on your screen and react, spotting a text about dinner and offering a Maps link, among other such helpful cues. In my testing, it almost never fired when I actually wanted it, and when it did, the suggestion was usually something I’d already thought of.
Now Brief in action.Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
There’s one smart privacy touch worth a mention, and that’s local AI processing. If you don’t want any of your personal data to go to the cloud, you can enable it to handle AI tasks on-device. You lose some of the heavier generative features, of course, but your data stays put and I appreciate that Samsung made it prominently accessible rather than burying the choice.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra battery life and charging: Stagnant, but reliable
Capacity and screen-on time
If there’s one soft spot on the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s stacked specs sheet, it’s the battery. Samsung has maximized the peak capacity at 5,000 mAh for yet another year. Rivals are out there are shipping silicon-carbon cells up to 8,000 mAh as the mainstream now, while Samsung sits tight. I understand the caution, but a competitor managing 40% more capacity in a similar footprint makes the decision a tad harder to defend.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
The 3nm chip and LTPO panel are efficient enough that battery life doesn’t tank midway through a day. It’s just not the class leader anymore. On a heavy day of 5G, gaming, and GPS usage, I averaged 5 to 6 hours of screen-on time, which meant charging every night without fail. On more moderate days, I landed closer to eight hours of screen-on time in standard testing, which is solid. The number that stings is the video streaming rundown. Simply put, if endurance is your single most important spec, the Ultra is no longer the phone to beat.
Charging speeds and MagSafe omissions
To make up for a stagnant battery capacity situation, charging got a lot quicker, and this is where Samsung genuinely improved things. Wired charging now runs at 60W, up from 45W. In practice, I hit 75% in about half an hour, and a full charge took around 54 minutes. That’s quick enough that a ten-minute top-up before heading out actually buys you meaningful hours. Wireless charging is bumped to 25W on the Qi 2.2 standard, which is fairly standard.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
But here’s the catch, and it’s a baffling one. Even though it supports Qi2 speeds, Samsung didn’t put the magnetic ring in the back of the phone. So if you want that satisfying magnetic snap, the MagSafe or Pixel Snap experience where the charger or accessory just clicks into place, you have to go buy a specific magnet-equipped case. On a $1,300 phone, that’s just annoying, and it’s the kind of small omission that nags at you every time you fumble a wireless charger and struggle with aligning the charging coil.
Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Galaxy S26 Ultra doesn’t reinvent anything. What it does is take the established Ultra formula and tighten every screw. An improved Armor Aluminum frame, a faster Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 finally drawing level with Apple, and that genuinely clever Privacy Display push the device forward in ways that matter.
Advertisement
Sure, the 5,000 mAh battery feels dated in 2026, the AI tricks are still a bit meh, and skipping native magnetic charging is baffling. But after spending months with the phone, none of that outweighed how much it simply does. It has the best stylus on any phone, a quad-camera system that’s now pretty strong in low light, and a beautiful, glare-resistant display. It’s still the phone to beat for power users. If you want one device that does everything, this is the one to get.
Why not try
If $1,300 stings, or the Ultra’s specific trade-offs don’t line up with how you live, here are three other options you can consider:
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — The best for ecosystem loyalists and battery life warriors. It’s the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s natural rival at roughly the same price. On the downside, it skips the stylus, misses out on true 10x zoom. To its credit, it crushes the Samsung phone on battery mileage, and it’s still the safest bet for point-and-shoot video. Moroever, nothing touches it if you already own a Mac, iPad, or Apple Watch.
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL— An obvious pick for clean software and effortless photography. It’s also cheaper, and it runs Google’s pure, bloat-free Android experience. The Tensor G5 won’t quite keep up in terms of raw performance, but the Pixel still pulls ahead on plain old still photography. It’s also got built-in magnetic charging via Pixel Snap, which is pretty convenient.
Samsung Galaxy S26+— Best for the majority who want flagship muscle for less. If the S Pen, the 200MP camera, the 5x zoom, and the Privacy Display all leave you cold, the S26+ is a smart buy. From $1,100 you get the same fast Snapdragon, the same seven-year update promise, and a near-identical design in a lighter body, with $200 still in your pocket, a seven-year update promise, and a near-identical design in a lighter body, with $200 still in your pocket.
How we tested
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
I got my hands on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra in its launch week, and over the course of the past four months, I have used it as my primary phone. I have traveled with it extensively, keeping it hooked to a 5G network and even using it as an on-the-go hotspot device for an extended spell.
As far as testing goes, the performance tests were conducted on two separate occasions, with vastly different ambient weather to get a clear picture of how it handles heat build-up and dissipation. Cameras were tested across four cities in different lighting conditions throughout the day.
On the software side, the phone was running One UI 8.5 stable build. At the time of writing this review, there were 140 apps running on the phone, which included third-party applications as well as those that came pre-installed on the phone. All testing was done with the device running in its native performance state.
Hoffman joined the board in 2016 after Microsoft bought his company LinkedIn for $26.2 billion. His tenure overlapped with some of the most consequential AI deals in the company’s history. He was a board member when Microsoft invested its first $1 billion into OpenAI in 2019, a bet that reshaped the company’s trajectory.
Hoffman was also one of OpenAI’s original investors and served on that company’s board until 2023. He stepped down citing too many potential conflicts of interest. Those conflicts multiplied further when Microsoft struck a $650 million acqui-hire deal with Inflection AI, the AI startup Hoffman co-founded.
That deal brought Inflection co-founder Mustafa Suleyman into Microsoft, where he now leads a narrower AI division focused on superintelligence. It also raised regulatory questions about conflicts on Big Tech boards.
Advertisement
Hoffman’s next chapter is Manus, a drug discovery company he co-founded. The startup has raised over $50 million across two seed rounds, with backing from General Catalyst. Its CEO is Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee, a physician, biologist, and Pulitzer Prize-winning author of “The Emperor of All Maladies.”
Hoffman holds the title of co-founder and chairman, not CEO. But he signalled on a recent episode of his “Possible” podcast that he plans to be far more hands-on.
“One of the things I realized over the last month was that, we’re seeing such progress with Manus. I need to get back to founder mode,” he told Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella during the conversation.
Hoffman said Manus is making progress on what he calls “Move 37” AI. The term refers to AI that supersedes human creativity, borrowed from AlphaGo’s famous move against world champion Lee Sedol. He believes the concept applies to chemistry, particularly in discovering novel compounds to combat cancer.
Advertisement
The departure comes as AI drug discovery heats up across the industry. ByteDance’s Anew Labs recently presented its first AI-designed therapy, and Google DeepMind’s Isomorphic Labs has AI-designed drug candidates entering clinical trials.
Ars Technica shares some anecdotes from Steve Jobs in Exile, a new book released last month:
[Author Geoffrey] Cain reminds us, in stunning detail, that Jobs’ “exile” era at NeXT was not only critical to his evolution as a man and an entrepreneur, but that it mattered for the rest of us, too. The technological innovations that came out of NeXT — notably, the NeXTSTEP OS — continue to live on in what we now call both macOS and iOS. As Cain puts it, “NeXTSTEP was Steve’s attempt to make Unix taste sweet….”
[W]hile many tech nerds know that Tim Berners-Lee created the first World Wide Web server on a NeXT machine while working in Switzerland in 1990, few know that NeXT employees were wary of bringing the news to Jobs. Why? They feared his wrath “and that he would dismiss [the web] as ‘shit.’” (In another timeline, NeXT might itself have capitalized on this world-changing innovation….)
Perhaps one of the wildest anecdotes that Cain uncovered was how one voicemail changed computer history forever. In 1996, when Apple was solidly in its mediocre Performa era — and considering buying BeOS as the basis for its new operating system — a mid-level NeXT product manager asked aloud, “Why don’t we just frickin’ call Apple?” (NeXT was also struggling during this period.) And so someone did. As Cain writes:
Advertisement
Garrett left the group of managers, walked back to his office, and took a risk. He picked up his designer phone and called the head of software at Apple. He left what he described as “one of my more inspired sales pitches” on the man’s voicemail, explaining why Apple should be looking at NeXT instead of Be… In any other universe, Garrett’s call might have gotten him fired. But in this timeline, it worked out. And thanks to him, Steve [Jobs] was about to enter Apple’s airspace once again.
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader destinyland for sharing the article.
Computex 2026 is over, and as usual, the show floor was packed with more laptops, PCs, components, peripherals, and oddball gadgets than any one person could properly process in a few days. There were sleek ultrabooks, massive gaming rigs, AI PCs, experimental designs, and plenty of products that looked like they were built mainly to make people stop and stare.
A handful of products stayed on our minds long after we left the show floor. They weren’t always the most practical, powerful, or important announcements, but each had something memorable about it. So, in no particular order, here are the coolest things we saw at Computex 2026.
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BN98 Pro Wi-Fi router
The ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BN98 Pro immediately caught our attention on the show floor. It looks absolutely wild, with a spider-like design that feels more like a sci-fi gaming prop than a router you would place next to your setup.
Vikhyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
Once you get past the spider-like design, the bigger surprise is that this is already a Wi-Fi 8 router. That sounds slightly unreal considering most households still rely on Wi-Fi 6 or even Wi-Fi 5, while Wi-Fi 7 remains a relatively premium upgrade. Instead of chasing higher throughput speeds, Wi-Fi 8 focuses more on connection reliability and efficiency.
Vikhyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
It has Adaptive QoE for intelligent traffic prioritization, Wi-Fi Insight for real-time network monitoring, AI Game Boost, and dual 10G ports. Do most people need a Wi-Fi 8 router right now? Probably not. But as a piece of future-facing gaming hardware, it was hard to ignore.
Pulsar Feinmann F01 Noctua Edition mouse
The Pulsar Feinmann F01 Noctua Edition is exactly the kind of thing that makes Computex fun. It is a gaming mouse with a tiny Noctua fan built into it, which sounds ridiculous at first, but makes much more sense when you actually try it.
Advertisement
Vikhyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
The mouse was shown earlier, but after delays, it now appears much closer to launch. It is based on Pulsar’s Feinmann F01, but weighs slightly more due to the added Noctua NF-A4x10 5V PWM fan. It has a 42,000 DPI sensor and 8K polling. The fan can spin at up to 5,000 RPM, but because it is so small, its noise is hardly noticeable. It blows a gentle breeze toward your palm to help keep your hand from getting sweaty during long gaming sessions.
Vikhyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
When it was first revealed last year, we thought the gimmick was pretty cute. After trying it in person, though, the idea started to make a lot more sense. Anyone who has spent hours gaming with sweaty hands will immediately understand the problem Noctua is trying to solve. It is definitely a little unusual, but we can see the practical appeal. That said, we only had a short time with the mouse on the show floor, so we did not get the chance to properly test how effective it is over a long gaming session or in a warm room where sweaty hands would really put the concept to the test.
Noctua also had its first liquid cooling AIO on display, and we saw a demo from the brand. It looks like a worthwhile AIO to keep an eye on for PC builders and Noctua fans who want to bring liquid cooling into their brown-and-beige themed setups.
Alienware AW3926QW monitor
Alienware’s AW3926QW was one of the more polished showpieces at Computex. It is a 39-inch curved Tandem OLED monitor, and at $1,099, it is obviously not cheap. But considering the size, 5K2K resolution, and RGB stripe OLED technology, the price starts to sound a little less outrageous.
Vikhyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
The RGB stripe layout improves text clarity and color performance compared with some older OLED monitor layouts. The monitor runs at 5120 x 2160 with a 165Hz refresh rate, but it also has a dedicated mode for competitive players. You can switch it into a 27-inch mode with black bars, dropping the resolution to 2560 x 1080 and pushing the refresh rate up to 330Hz.
Vikhyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
That basically makes the monitor a jack of all trades. You can use it as a large, immersive curved display for cinematic gaming or productivity, then switch to a faster esports-focused screen when needed. It also looked great in person without being too flashy.
Gigabyte X870E AORUS INFINITY NEXT motherboard
It is Gigabyte’s 40th anniversary, so we expected the brand to do something special for the occasion. However, we were not prepared for the brand to turn the engineering madness up to eleven with the X870E AORUS INFINITY NEXT motherboard.
Vivkyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
It immediately grabbed our attention with its almost biological-looking hollow structures. We soon discovered that this is not just a cosmetic choice, but something far more bizarre. These “gyroid” structures are actually heatsinks, created using advanced 3D metal printing and “thruster-grade thermal materials” to cool the components and VRMs of the motherboard in low Earth orbit.
Yes, you read that right. This motherboard is meant to function in space. Since there is no airflow available to wick heat away from the components in those conditions, these structures are Gigabyte’s solution to the problem. The brand has also 3D-printed a vapor chamber for the chipset and added a honeycomb-style metal backplate to push cooling to the extreme.
Advertisement
Vivkyaat Vivek / Digital TrendsVivkyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
Then there is the power delivery. This thing has 64 power phases and uses Low Earth Orbit and data center-grade Quad OptiMOS technology to deliver up to 5,120 amps of total current. That is beyond overkill for a gaming PC, and honestly, we think Gigabyte made this motherboard just to show that it can.
Gigabyte did not say when or if it plans to launch this motherboard to market. However, we did learn that manufacturing it alone costs about $3,000, so even if it ever does go on sale, it will be extremely expensive.
Framework Laptop 13 Pro
The Framework Laptop 13 Pro was announced a few months back, and we were eager to get our hands on the laptop to see if it actually delivers on its advertised promises, and it did not disappoint. The first thing that stood out to us is how sturdy the laptop felt. The brand has taken a page out of Apple’s playbook and used an aluminium unibody chassis in the 13 Pro.
Vikhyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
The latch has also been improved so removing or plugging in the expansion cards can be done with one hand, which is a good quality-of-life change. Framework has also moved to LPCAMM2 memory on the Laptop 13 Pro, allowing it to use LPDDR5x while still keeping memory upgradeable. This is significant because laptops that use LPDDR memory are typically not upgradeable.
Vikhyaat Vivek / Digital TrendsVikhyaat Vivek / Digital Trends
It has a 13.5-inch display with 2.8K resolution that finally offers touch support, though the laptop can only bend backward up to 180 degrees, so it can’t be flipped into a tablet. The other big upgrade is the 74Wh battery, which is 22% larger than the previous generation, with the brand claiming more than 20 hours of Netflix 4K streaming. We could not verify that claim during our brief hands-on time.
That said, the Framework Laptop 13 Pro is not cheap. The pre-built model starts at $1,499 with an Intel Core Ultra 5 325 processor, so there is an upfront premium. But that price is easier to accept because this is a laptop you can upgrade over time rather than replace entirely.
California’s attorney general Rob Bonta launched a probe into the deal shortly after it was announced.
Robert V Schwemmer/Shutterstock
Amid widespread opposition to Paramount’s $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros., multiple US states are reportedly working together to fight the merger. According to a Reuters report, California and New York are among states preparing a lawsuit to block the deal.
The deal has faced scrutiny since it was announced back in February, when Paramount officially beat out Netflix in its attempt to buy Warner Bros. following multiple bids. California Attorney General Rob Bonta in particular has voiced concerns about the potential consequences, saying in a statement at the time, “Further consolidation in markets that are central to American economic life does not serve our economy, consumers, or competition well. In fact, consolidation of markets has led to increased unaffordability, a loss of good-paying job opportunities, and fewer choices for consumers.” Bonta added that the deal “must receive a full and robust review,” and said the state is “committed to fighting market consolidation that we find unlawful.”
We don’t know yet what other states are involved in the lawsuit alongside California and New York. But according to Reuters‘ source, the suit is expected to be filed within the coming weeks.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: 2-minute review
The 8849 Tank Pad Ultra arrives as the company’s most ambitious device to date. It builds on the original Tank Pad’s projector concept and refines it considerably. Where the first Tank Pad offered a dim 100-lumen DLP unit running at sub-HD resolution, the Ultra steps up to 260 lumens and native 1920×1080 output. That is a 2.6x improvement in brightness in one generation, and it matters enormously in practice.
The hardware underneath is a MediaTek Dimensity 8200 paired with 16GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 512GB of storage. This is not the fastest platform available in 2026, but it is more than sufficient for field work, document management, and media playback. Android 15 ships out of the box, which is a refreshing improvement over the Android 14 found on many rivals.
Advertisement
The camera cluster is genuinely impressive for a rugged device. A Sony IMX766 50MP main sensor sits alongside a 64MP night-vision camera using an OmniVision OV64B sensor backed by four infrared LEDs. The 32MP front camera uses a Sony IMX616. This is a meaningful step beyond the dual-camera arrangements on most competing rugged tablets.
Battery capacity is the headline stat: 23,400mAh. 8849 claims this is 11% larger than its predecessor. Charging speed is 66W, which is serviceable but falls well short of the 120W found on the recently launched Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra. At that battery capacity, 66W takes over two hours to fully recharge.
The body measures 268.3 x 170.3 x 24mm and weighs 1.345kg. It is a heavy device, though it sits below the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra’s 1.6kg. The integrated handle doubles as a kickstand and is the most practical design element here for outdoor projection use.
Advertisement
IP68 and IP69K certification allows for both submersion and high-pressure water jets. That is the expected baseline for a device at this price and positioning. A 4-metre laser rangefinder and an 800-lumen camping light round out the utility toolkit.
In the annals of tablets that came with a projector, this is clearly one of the best rugged tablets so far.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Advertisement
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: price and availability
How much does it cost? $690/£524/€605
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? You can get it directly from 8849.
At $689.99, this rugged tablet is priced way below the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra, which commands closer to $799. It sits significantly above the original Tank Pad’s sub-$400 positioning. The price increase reflects genuine hardware improvements rather than marketing inflation, particularly in the projector and camera departments.
UK pricing is £525.84 and in the EU its €604.79. There is a summer sale for US, EU, UK and CA customers with a further $20 reduction until the 12th of June.
Currently, this machine isn’t on Amazon.com, but given that everything else 8849-branded is, it’s probably only a matter of time before it is. The hardware is also sold by AliExpress, but it was more expensive than buying it directly for whatever reason.
Advertisement
Given the specification, even if the TANK Pad Ultra isn’t exactly cheap, it offers the best value for a tablet with a projector.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Item
Spec
Advertisement
CPU:
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
GPU:
ARM Mali-G610 MC6
Advertisement
NPU:
MediaTek APU 580
RAM:
16GB LPDDR5
Advertisement
Storage:
512GB UFS 3.1 + dedicated microSD slot (up to 2TB)
Screen:
10.95-inch IPS LCD
Advertisement
Resolution:
1200 x 1920 (FHD+) pixels
SIM:
2x Nano SIM + TF (SD-XC)
Advertisement
Weight:
1345 g
Dimensions:
268.3 × 170.3 × 23.6 mm
Advertisement
Rugged Spec:
IP68 & IP69K rugged (water/dust/shock resistant)
Rear cameras:
50MP Sony IMX766 (primary) + 64MP OmniVision OV64B (night vision, 4x IR LEDs)
Advertisement
Front camera:
32 MP (Sony IMX616, fixed focus)
Networking:
5G NR, dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC, FM radio, USB-C (OTG), 3.5mm headphone jack
Advertisement
Projector:
DLP, 260 lumens, 1920×1080, autofocus, 0.5-4m
Torch/Lamp:
800-lumen camping light, dual warning lights (red/blue) with sound simulation
Advertisement
OS:
Android 15
Biometrics:
Side-mounted fingerprint sensor
Advertisement
Battery:
23400 mAh (66W wired, 10W reverse charge)
Colours:
Black
Advertisement
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: design
Heavy duty
Kickstand issues
Idiosyncratic layout
On paper, the Tank Pad Ultra follows the established formula for rugged tablets. The body is thick and reinforced, with corner bumpers and rubberised edges. At 24mm deep it is not a device that slips into a jacket pocket unless you’re a friendly giant. The intention is clear: this is business equipment, not a lifestyle accessory.
The integrated handle on the rear is a practical touch. It locks flat against the body for carrying and swings out to serve as a kickstand for projection or media use. For a device this heavy, the handle is not an option, it is a functional necessity.
Which is why I was annoyed when I couldn’t get the one that came with my tablet to fit correctly. The stand is metal and is pinned to the TANK Pad Ultra by a single large bolt that has a straight slot that a ‘8849 coin’ is provided to tighten. On mine, it would never tighten enough to fully engage the stand, making it loose.
Initially, I thought this was because of an excessive amount of blue thread-locker on the bolt, but after I’d scraped that off and realised it didn’t fix the problem, I concluded the thread in the tablet was poorly manufactured.
Advertisement
I didn’t have the thread cutter to fix this handy, so I filed the bolt down a little to make it extend less, and it fitted much better. Not sure why 8849 quality assurance didn’t notice this, but they need to make sure that they do in the future.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
One oddity about the stand is that it has a square profile that engages, allowing for four possible ways to attach it. Except that only one direction works properly, because the others interfere either with the camera cluster or the camping light. Perhaps a polariser is needed to help users put it on correctly?
The top edge houses the volume keys and two PPT buttons in roughly the middle of that side, with the projector mounted to the left. The power button with an integrated fingerprint scanner is on the left side, where I kept accidentally hitting it while trying to take photos.
I tried to set that button up with fingerprint unlock and failed miserably. When you enter the fingerprint training mode, it tells you to firmly press the button, and when you do, the tablet turns off. Thankfully, the face unlock works much better, so it’s hardly a deal breaker.
Advertisement
The SIM tray is on the lower edge, and the USB-C and audio jack ports are under a rubber plug on the right side.
What’s missing here is any pogo pin pads or extra USB port that could be used to connect the tablet to a vehicle cradle. Which, when you have a tablet that’s 1345 g, you would reasonably expect to exist. There isn’t one, which explains why the designers never considered supporting that functionality.
Overall, the layout of this tablet isn’t the best I’ve seen, but most people could probably adapt to it.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Design score: 3.5/5
Advertisement
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: hardware
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 5G
260 Lumen Projector
23,400 mAh battery
The Dimensity 8200 is a solid midrange to upper-midrange platform. Built on a 4nm process, it delivers capable performance for multitasking, Android gaming, and field software use. It is not the Dimensity 9000 series or a Snapdragon 8 Gen equivalent, and buyers with heavy sustained workloads should note the distinction. For the use cases this device targets, it is more than adequate and a step up from the Dimensity 7400X that Ulefone used in its most recent design.
For no logical reason, rugged tablet makers seem to think decent processors or camera sensors aren’t required, when they’re as critical as they are in phones.
Sixteen gigabytes of LPDDR5 RAM is generous. Combined with the expandable storage via microSD, the Tank Pad Ultra avoids the storage cliff that afflicts cheaper rugged tablets.
But it’s the DLP projector that is the engineering centrepiece in this design. At 260 lumens, it is 2.6 times brighter than the original Tank Pad’s 100-lumen unit. Auto-focus handles throw distances between 0.5 and 4 metres. A micro-ranging laser assists the focus calibration for precise image sharpness. The native output resolution of 1920×1080 is a substantial step up from the 854×480 of the original device, and better than the 960 x 540 projector on the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra.
Advertisement
My only issue with the projector is that 8849 didn’t implement a low-throw solution where the tablet could be flat on a desk and still project an image on the wall. With this design, you need to use the stand or a pile of books to elevate the tablet to a height where the projection will work.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
The 23,400mAh battery is enormous, even if some rugged tablets have even more. Runtime estimates in the field will depend heavily on whether the projector, camping light, and 5G radio are active simultaneously. With the projector running, expect significantly reduced endurance versus a typical standby or browsing scenario.
One last special feature of this tablet is the GPS solution. It uses dual frequencies L1+L5 GPS for more precise positioning, in theory. I’ve not seen this in a rugged tablet before, and it could be genuinely useful for those flying drones or doing surveys. In my testing, it did seem marginally more accurate than the GPS in a typical phone.
Advertisement
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: cameras
50MP, 64MP on the rear
32MP on the front
Three cameras in total
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
The 8849 Tank Pad Ultra has three cameras:
Rear cameras: 50MP Sony IMX766 , 64MP Omnivision OV64B1B Sensor (Night Vision) Front camera: 32MP Sony IMX616
The camera configuration is one of the Tank Pad Ultra’s stronger arguments over rivals. Most rugged tablets treat imaging as an afterthought. 8849 has invested meaningfully here.
The main camera uses a Sony IMX766 sensor at 50MP. This is the same sensor found in numerous premium Android smartphones, so expectations for image quality are reasonably well established. The large 1/1.56-inch format and all-pixel autofocus should deliver solid results in good light.
Advertisement
The night-vision camera is the headline differentiator. The 64MP OmniVision OV64B sensor is backed by four infrared LEDs and a dual-tone LED flash capable of 1.5A output. 8849 claims usable images in near-total darkness. This is genuinely useful for inspection work, security documentation, or field work in unlit environments.
The 32MP Sony IMX616 front camera is well specified for video calls and document scanning. For remote workers filing from a site office, the quality here matters more than it might for a consumer device.
Looking through my examples, the rear camera on this tablet produces some excellent results. The colour is accurate and not oversaturated, the edges of objects are crisp, and even the sky avoids being blown out. Using editing tools, it’s easy to get extra detail out of shadows and crop without making images appear blocky.
And, the 64MP Omnivision OV64B1B is one of the best choices for a night vision sensor, currently.
Advertisement
There are limited special photo modes, but you do get timelapse, super resolution, and QR codes, and there is a PRO mode. Video capture has scene modes and a full spectrum of resolutions from VGA up to 4K.
The only way this could get much better is if the optics had a proper zoom and not a digital one, but relatively few phones or tablets have that feature.
The only blot here is that 8849 wouldn’t pay for Widevine L1 encryption, so the best resolution you can stream from major providers is 480P, even if the screen would handle 1080p easily. Unfortunate, but a predictable limitation.
That point aside, this is one of the best camera solutions on a rugged tablet I’ve encountered, and for those doing surveys or wanting to capture property or vehicle damage, the provided tools are more than most will realistically need.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
8849 TANK Pad Ultra Camera samples
Image 1 of 14
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: Performance
Modern SoC
Good battery life
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Tablet
Row 0 – Cell 1
8849 Tank Pad Ultra
UleFone Armor Pad 5 Ultra
Advertisement
SoC
Row 1 – Cell 1
MediaTek Dimensity 8200
MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
GPU
Advertisement
Row 2 – Cell 1
ARM Mali-G610 MC6
ARM Mali-G615 MC2
Mem
Row 3 – Cell 1
16GB/512GB
Advertisement
12GB/512GB
Weight
Row 4 – Cell 1
1345 g
1,600g
Advertisement
Battery Capacity
mAh
23,400
24,200
Advertisement
Geekbench
Single
1254
1047
Advertisement
Row 7 – Cell 0
Multi
3885
2900
Row 8 – Cell 0
OpenCL
Advertisement
4094
3022
Row 9 – Cell 0
Vulkan
4632
Advertisement
3046
PCMark
3.0 Score
15276
Advertisement
12199
Row 11 – Cell 0
Battery
30h 43m
28h 27 min
Advertisement
Charge 30
%
25%
27%
Advertisement
Passmark
Score
16894
13661
Advertisement
Row 14 – Cell 0
CPU
8413
6788
3DMark
Advertisement
Slingshot OGL
7711
6578
Row 16 – Cell 0
Slingshot Ex. OGL
Advertisement
Maxed
5477
Row 17 – Cell 0
Slingshot Ex. Vulkan
Maxed
Advertisement
5156
Row 18 – Cell 0
Wildlife
6280
3555
Advertisement
The Dimensity 8200 platform performs comfortably in daily use. Android 15 runs without the stuttering or lag that can affect less powerful rugged tablets. Multitasking between field apps, maps, and documents is smooth.
Gaming performance is functional rather than flagship. The Mali-G610 MC6 GPU handles lighter titles well. Sustained gaming or graphics-intensive applications will cause throttling, as is typical for this class of chip under prolonged load.
The projector introduces a notable power draw. Thermal management under combined projector and processing load is an area worth monitoring in extended field scenarios. The device body will warm noticeably during sustained projection.
If we compare the 8200 with the 7400X that the Ulefone tablet uses, this SoC is roughly 25% quicker across the board, and better than that in graphics performance.
Advertisement
However, with great performance comes even greater power consumption. And, while the battery life of the machine looks good at 30 hours and 43 minutes, there is a caveat that the Ulefone device still had 27% of its battery unused when the benchmark aborted. Where the 8849 machine only had 5%, therefore the win should go to the Ulefone.
That said, this is more than enough capacity for most uses, and if curated, a running time of more than five days is easily within reach.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
8849 TANK Pad Ultra: Final verdict
For field engineers, survey teams, and outdoor professionals who project content regularly and need the clearest image possible from an integrated device, the Tank Pad Ultra earns a confident recommendation. For everyone else, the 8849 Tank Pad Ultra is the current high-water mark for built-in pico projection in a rugged tablet.
Advertisement
The leap from 100 lumens and 854×480 to 260 lumens and native 1080p is a generational step, not an incremental one. Add a Sony sensor main camera, a 64MP night-vision unit, a laser rangefinder, and a 23,400mAh battery at $690, and the value proposition is difficult to argue against.
The shortcomings are real but predictable. Sixty-six watts of charging is slow for a battery this large, even if it can manage a complete cycle in two hours. The device is heavy and thick by any standard other than the rugged-tablet category it occupies. The Dimensity 8200, while capable, is not a premium 2026 platform, even if it’s the exception to the rule that rugged tablets are typically underpowered.
Against the Ulefone Armor Pad 5 Ultra, its most direct rival, the Tank Pad Ultra wins on projector brightness, projector resolution, SoC power, weight and price. It loses on charging speed and the dual-floodlight provision. Which device wins depends entirely on which compromises suit your workflow, and how tight your budget is.
Advertisement
Should I buy a 8849 TANK Pad Ultra?
Swipe to scroll horizontally
8849 TANK Pad Ultra Score Card
Attributes
Notes
Rating
Value
Advertisement
Reasonable cost for an exceptional feature set
4/5
Design
Heavy and thick, with an awkward stand
Advertisement
3.5/5
Hardware
Modern SoC, lots of RAM and storage, and a bright projector
4.5/5
Advertisement
Camera
Decent sensor delivers good results
4/5
Performance
Advertisement
Powerful, power efficient and excellent battery life
Engineering physics students at the University of British Columbia finished a capstone project that produced something unusual in robotics. Their air hockey robot learned every move inside a computer simulation and then stepped onto real hardware ready to face human opponents with no further adjustments. The approach bypassed the usual slow and risky process of training directly on physical equipment.
Over the course of around two years, multiple student teams worked together to complete the project. Hudson Nock, Ian Hartley, and Mauro Ferraz led the last assault. They took over an early iteration of the hardware foundation, with the primary purpose of narrowing the gap between virtual training and real-world performance. The whole code and two pretty lengthy technical reports are now available on GitHub for anyone who want to read everything and understand every decision they made.
For any automated system, air hockey presents some significant issues. The table surface is never completely smooth, the puck travels at high speeds, bounces vary depending on where it hits the wooden rails, and motor efficiency degrades when the power supply voltage lowers under strain. Conventional physics models frequently fall short of adequately capturing these differences in order to transition from simulation to reality. Instead than relying just on a generic engine, the UBC team chose to meticulously measure the actual hardware and then mimic its unique characteristics within the code.
All the sensing is controlled by a single camera above. The puck is marked with retroreflective tape, while the opposing mallet is marked with a unique marker. Even when the camera uses very short exposures of only 100 microseconds to stop the movement, some bright LEDs close to the lens make both objects appear exceptionally clear and crisp. In order to keep the position error down to nearly precisely one millimeter over the entire surface, they also performed some calibration work using markers around the table edges. This is quite astounding given the little warping that would otherwise be an issue. A contour tracker can follow the puck all the way through even when the gantry obstructs the view. The human player’s mallet can be found by the same camera at a scorching 120 frames per second.
A Core XY gantry positioned high above one side of the table generates movement. The mallet is guided by two belt-driven motors and an STM32 Blue Pill microcontroller. During system testing, the team went to the trouble of determining how the mallet reacts to various voltage signals and recording it all as a third order transfer functions. They used a combination of feedforward controls and PID feedback to keep the mallet on track and virtually perfectly aimed. A sizable supercapacitor is also used to stabilize the voltage during rapid accelerations.
Custom code designed for speed and accuracy powers the simulation itself. The application employs analytical solutions to simulate both puck and mallet motion, reducing the need for time-consuming numerical integration stages. They use an adaptive collision timing technique to ensure that no impacts are missed. When the puck strikes the wooden rails, a small neural network with only 112 parameters kicks in, predicting both the departing velocity and angle, as well as a measure of uncertainty. The simulator then draws from that uncertainty distribution at random throughout each run, so the learning agent should expect slightly unfair and noisy bounces rather than flawless ones.
Vectorization allows a standard laptop to run thousands of game instances at the same time. On a normal Intel i5, the entire simulation runs approximately 230 times faster than real time, which is rather impressive. That kind of pace makes it absolutely practical to run extensive training sessions. To account for issues such as camera lag and control input latency, the agent is given a state that includes the most recent puck and mallet action over a variety of delays. It then outputs the voltage parameters for the motion profile together with the intended final mallet position.
Advertisement
The Soft Actor Critic reinforcement learning technique was used to train networks with about 200,000 parameters. The squad took action since self-play alone can result in one-dimensional strategies. After training, they just applied the policy to the actual controller without any further fine-tuning in the real world, resulting in some deviation. The round trip delays are all kept in sync while the entire system runs on a 60-Hz loop. [Source]
As spotted by Windows Report, a flag in the new Chrome Canary release called Fulfill Searchbox Queries in AI Mode appeared to confirm people’s worst fears. Read Entire Article Source link
You must be logged in to post a comment Login