Duckbill, the consulting firm that Quinn co-founded with Mike Julian, is making what amounts to a high-stakes pivot: transforming into a software company with a new platform called Skyway that aims to make cloud spending more predictable for large companies.
The company, based in San Francisco, announced $7.75 million in funding from Heavybit, Uncork Capital, and Encoded Ventures to accelerate product development and grow its 10-person team.
Their contrarian pitch: the cloud cost management sector, commonly known in the industry as FinOps, is fixated on making bills smaller, when the real problem is that nobody can predict what the costs will be next month.
Advertisement
“Finance doesn’t lose sleep over whether your cloud bill is $1 million or $100 million,” Quinn said in a news release. “They lose sleep when it jumps 30% and nobody can explain why.”
Julian, Duckbill’s CEO, said in an interview that the company came to realize that existing cloud cost management tools are built by startups, for startups, for the most part. Many of Duckbill’s large enterprise clients had tried those tools, rejected them, and ended up building their own.
“I have a hypothesis that the people building in FinOps today come from startups and not from enterprise, so they don’t even know many of the problems exist,” Julian said.
Duckbill’s clients, which include companies such as Airtable, Ticketmaster, and New Relic, spend $70 million a year on cloud infrastructure, on average. (Tagline for their consulting business: “Cloud cost management for the nine-figure club.”) That’s well above the $1 million annual minimum that AWS requires for a private pricing contract. At that scale, Julian said, you start to see patterns and problems that don’t exist for smaller companies.
Advertisement
All told, the company says it has negotiated tens of billions of dollars in cloud contracts, giving it unique insights. (“Our schlep is our moat,” reads one of its internal whiteboards.)
Skyway’s first module, called Contract Manager, converts private pricing deals into structured data, validating that customers are getting discounts they negotiated, and projecting spending.
The bigger vision extends well beyond AWS. Duckbill started with a specialization in Amazon’s cloud platform but has expanded into Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. Julian said the ultimate goal is to structure spending data across every piece of software and infrastructure a company uses: SaaS tools like Datadog and Snowflake, AI providers like Anthropic and OpenAI, and even legacy data centers for customers still using their own mainframes.
Julian acknowledged that the pivot into software will eventually cannibalize a portion of Duckbill’s consulting business, but said he doesn’t expect it to disappear entirely. Big companies need services, he said, pointing to companies like ServiceNow and CrowdStrike that built major software businesses while maintaining significant services revenue.
Advertisement
The market for cloud cost management technology is crowded, and difficult. The latest casualty: Spokane-area startup Vega Cloud, which entered receivership after raising millions in financing.
But Julian contends that it’s not really one market. Companies like Point5 focus on workload optimization. Others like Finout specialize in cost allocation. He sees Duckbill as doing something different: building financial planning and forecasting software for infrastructure.
Duckbill isn’t using artificial intelligence in its own product yet. This will not surprise anyone familiar with Quinn’s aversion to industry hype. However, by bringing structure to messy spending data, Skyway is positioned to create what Julian calls “AI candy” — clean, labeled information that customers can put to use in their own systems.
At the same time, AI is making it harder to predict cloud costs.
Advertisement
“Cloud spend is already one of the largest and least predictable line items in the enterprise,” said Joseph Ruscio, general partner at Heavybit, one of the firms backing Duckbill’s pivot, in the press release announcing the funding. “AI infrastructure is about to compound that volatility.”
Duckbill currently has 10 employees and plans to grow to 15 by the end of the current quarter and 20 by year-end, with most of the new hires in engineering. The company also hired Jim Moses, who previously worked at AWS as a private pricing negotiator, as director of hyperscaler strategy, essentially putting someone from the other side of the table on their team.
It’s not the first time Quinn and Julian have tried to build a product. In 2022, Duckbill attempted to make the leap from services to software. It was an “abject failure,” as Quinn acknowledged in a video discussion with Julian, released by the company as part of the announcement.
“Turns out that if you just assume you know what customers want and don’t talk to them, you’re gonna go somewhere, but not where you wanted to go,” he said.
Advertisement
In addition to its website, Quinn noted, Duckbill can be reached at 833-AWS-BILL.
Known as Zombie ZIP, the method hides malware inside a deliberately malformed compressed archive. According to its creators, most antivirus engines currently fail to detect the threat, potentially giving attackers a new delivery mechanism. At the same time, some researchers argue the technique is less a vulnerability and more a… Read Entire Article Source link
Adobe has agreed to pay the US government $75 million to settle its lawsuit over the company’s allegedly harmful approach to subscriptions. The suit started in 2024, when the US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission filed a joint complaint alleging the company deliberately made it difficult to cancel subscriptions and obscured the frequently expensive “early termination fee” customers have to pay to get out of annual subscriptions that are paid monthly.
“While we disagree with the government’s claims and deny any wrongdoing, we are pleased to resolve this matter,” Adobe writes. “We have agreed to provide $75 million worth of free services to customers that qualify. We will proactively reach out to the affected customers once the appropriate filings with the Court are made and accepted. Additionally, we have agreed to a $75 million payment to the Department of Justice.”
Adobe’s statement also notes that it’s made the process of both signing up for and canceling subscriptions “more streamlined and transparent.” A major sticking point of the original complaint is that canceling an “annual plan, paid monthly” subscription before completing the first year of service required customers to pay an early termination fee to make up for the value Adobe lost initially offering its software at a discount. Adobe currently allows plans to be refunded if they’re canceled within 14 days after signing up, but canceling an “annual plan, paid monthly” subscription after those first 14 days requires paying a hefty fee (as outlined in the company’s detailed support page).
A court will have to approve Adobe’s proposed settlement before the lawsuit can be totally resolved, but the timing is at least a little ironic. Shantanu Narayen, Adobe’s CEO for the last 18 years and the executive who oversaw the company’s transition from traditional software business to software-as-a-service business, recently announced plans to retire.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
How to Make a Killing was one of my most anticipated new movies of 2026. Unfortunately I was left feeling underwhelmed by A24’s latest venture, which doesn’t stand up against a catalog of greats.
Remakes are risky enough as it is, but Kind Hearts and Coronets is an especially tough act to follow. The iconic 40s movie brought something new to the table, with Alec Guinness especially stealing the show as he played eight members of the same wealthy family.
Advertisement
It was a solid black comedy that even stands up today, making How to Make a Killing feel unnecessary and sadly, boring. Unlike its predecessor, the 2026 movie offers nothing new, aside from a fresh cast of modern day actors that do their best. But it really is difficult not to compare it to the source material, and that’s where the disappointment lies.
Had this been an original thriller movie, perhaps my opinion would’ve differed. But unfortunately, How to Make a Killing feels very soulless and it doesn’t have the charm of the movie that inspired it.
Even Glen Powell, who has previously delivered great performances in Twisters and Chad Powers, can’t really save this movie. His leading role as Becket Redfellow shouldn’t feel boring, especially as he’s a serial killer with an intriguing motivation.
Director John Patton Ford impressed audiences with Emily The Criminal, which has a 93% Rotten Tomatoes score. So it’s disappointing that How to Make a Killing has fallen flat, when we know he’s capable of creating a really great movie.
Advertisement
How to Make a Killing | Official Trailer HD | A24 – YouTube
Considering this is a movie about a man who murders his wealthy family as an act of revenge, it is disappointing that it ended up being as boring as it is. Becket’s mother was exiled after she became pregnant as a teenager, and on her deathbed, told a young Becket that he should fight for the life he “deserves” to have. He does, but it’s not all that exciting to watch.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
There are some positives to be found in this movie, though. Margaret Qualley always delivers a great performance, no matter what she’s in. She blew me away as Sue in The Substance, which I called the best body horror of 2024.
She’s entertaining to watch here, too, as Julia Steinway, Becket’s childhood friend and crush, whom he hopes to win the heart of. Scenes involving them are perhaps my favorite part of the movie, and I did like some of the humor, but ultimately, this is a disappointment for A24, a studio I usually have a lot of love for.
Advertisement
If you’re in the mood for a run-of-the-mill dark comedy with a few laughs and some notable names, you might want to see this now that it’s out in theaters, or perhaps wait to see if it arrives on any of the best streaming services.
Disappointingly, it’s one of those forgettable movies that you’ll likely watch just once. But perhaps it will do its job of keeping you entertained for a couple of hours.
How to Make a Killing is in theaters worldwide now.
And of course, you can also follow TechRadar on YouTube and TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
A key part of the appeal of any great luxury car is its comfortable, smooth ride, but making the most of that ride will require the right tires. A 2025 study by JD Power surveyed luxury car owners to see which manufacturer delivered the most consistently satisfactory luxury car tires, with three manufacturers achieving scores above the segment average. In third place was Pirelli, the historic Italian tire company that’s now partly owned by Chinese investors. The second-place spot went to Michelin, with first place in the survey awarded to Goodyear.
This marks a reversal of fortune for the top two brands compared to 2024, when JD Power ranked Goodyear second and Michelin at the top of the table. The 2025 survey didn’t elaborate on the potential reasons behind Goodyear’s new, higher ranking. However, JD Power’s director, Jason Norton, was quoted as saying that “the overall experience of tire traction and handling during poor weather conditions […] is one of the top customer concerns.” He added that “a greater focus on quality” improved the chance that customers would become repeat customers of a tire brand.
The survey asked owners how happy they were with their tire purchases, based on four criteria. According to JD Power, the two most important areas were tire ride and tire wear, but handling and appearance were also taken into account in the ranking.
Advertisement
Bridgestone scored worst overall in the luxury category
Andresr/Getty Images
At the other end of the luxury car tire rankings, JD Power’s least satisfactory brand was Bridgestone. It returned a score of 783, well below the segment average of 798 and significantly less than Goodyear’s score of 821. The Korean tire brand Hankook and Continental were joint second-least satisfying in the luxury category. Both scored 795 points, just below the segment average.
Goodyear’s score in the luxury tire category proved too high for its rivals to beat, but luxury car tires weren’t the only segment where the brand did well. It also took top spot in the passenger car tire category and achieved a second-place finish in the performance sport category. The only segment in which Goodyear didn’t perform well was the truck and utility category, where it received a score only marginally above the segment average. Thankfully, buyers looking for top-rated truck tires have a plethora of other options available, with JD Power ranking Hankook and Michelin as the most satisfactory brands in that category.
Meta AI should soon be better at surfacing international news content thanks to a set of new deals with publishers. The company announced new agreements with international outlets and offered additional details on its recent deal with News Corp.
The latest deals bring French newspaper Le Figaro, Spanish media company Prisa and German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung into the fold. Together, along with News Corp, which runs a number of outlets in the UK, these sources should give Meta AI better access to timely info about world events. Meta didn’t disclose terms of the deals — The Wall Street Journal previously reported the News Corp arrangement was worth up to $50 million a year — but it said that it intends to link out to the relevant news sources.
“These integrations will also facilitate easier access to information by linking out to articles, allowing you to visit these partners’ websites for more details while providing value to partners, enabling them to reach new audiences,” Meta wrote in an update. The company has a long and sometimes fraught history with publishers as its priorities have shifted over the years. In the past, Meta has struck deals to pay publishers to produce live video and “instant articles” only to change course as news content has become less of a priority for Facebook.
Now, with Meta struggling to compete with its AI rivals, it seems the social media company is once again interested in news content. As the company notes in its blog post, Meta AI isn’t always great at surfacing accurate and timely info. I noted this in 2024 when the company’s assistant was repeatedly unable to accurately answer seemingly simple questions like ” who is the Speaker of the House of Representatives.”
Advertisement
By striking a bunch of deals with publishers, the company should be better equipped to handle these kinds of queries (and hopefully more complex ones). How much benefit publishers will see from these arrangements, however, is an open question. While Meta says it will link out to the relevant news sources, there are lots of outside data points that raise serious questions about the effect AI search tools are having on web traffic.
Ford does sell an electric pickup, but not very many of them. We can’t say for sure, but it’s possible that if the F150 Lightning had the classic cool of [ScottenMotors] 1977 F150 SuperCab conversion they’d have better numbers.
The battery box sits where a V8 used to choke on well-meaning emissions controls.
On Reddit, [Scotten] shares the takeaways from his conversion effort, which involved a custom Tesla-cell battery pack and a new rear axle assembly to house the Tesla SDU (Small Drive Unit). A Large Drive Unit (LDU) would probably fit, but the SDU already puts out 264 HP, which compares rather favourably to the 156 HP this truck’s malaise-era V8 put out stock. The old F-bodies were great trucks in a lot of respects, but even an die-hard ICE enthusiast is probably not going to be sad to see that motor go.
Choosing to put the integrated drive unit in the rear axle complicates the build compared to other conversions that re-use the
Before the bed goes on, you can see the new rear axle with the Tesla SPU. There might be room for another, smaller battery under there.
stock transmission and differential, but saves you all the losses associated with that frankly unnecessary powertrain hardware. The takeaway there is to figure out all the mechanical work on the chassis, because the EV stuff is actually the easy part. [Scotten] had the wheels turning a full year before he got the brakes figured out, because even if they’re just the rears and even if there’s regen– you want all the breaks to work on your test drive.
With the 100kW power pack, he’s getting about 220 miles of range. From the pictures, it looks like he’s filled up most of the hood space with that battery, but we can’t help but wonder if there’s room under the bed where the gas tank(s) lived to squeeze in more cells for those of us who need to go further.
OpenAI plans to add its Sora video generation model directly into ChatGPT, The Information reports . The standalone Sora app was seen as a smash hit when it launched alongside Sora 2 in September 2025, but interest in the video generation app has fallen in the time since as users ran into limits on the amount and kinds of videos they could create.
Adding Sora to the ChatGPT could give the model a second life, and ideally grow the ChatGPT app’s weekly active users from the 900 million OpenAI reported in February, to a billion or more. According to The Information, the standalone Sora app will stick around after the model is integrated, even though the app has fallen out of the App Store’s top 100 free apps and only a small number of users reportedly share their videos publicly in the app.
It’s hard to pin down an exact number for what generating a video costs OpenAI, but the company charges API customers $0.10 per second for a 720p video, and in 2025, it was willing to give away 30 free video generations per account per a day in the Sora app. When you consider the even larger audience that could use the model in the ChatGPT app, things could get expensive fast. That could be one reason The Information reports OpenAI has projected it could spend over $225 billion on inference — the cost of running the company’s models — between 2026 and 2030.
The company has attempted to monetize the Sora app by having users pay for credits to generate new videos, and could deploy something similar once the model comes to ChatGPT. Maybe giving customers the ability to generate videos with Disney characters could even get people to pay for more videos once they run out of free generations. Whether or not adding Sora to ChatGPT moves the needle for OpenAI, though, the company will likely be spending even more money than it was before.
And then there were two: Of the original 11 co-founders who kickstarted xAI with Elon Musk three years ago, only two remain as the deep learning lab continues a personnel overhaul to compete with Anthropic and OpenAI. That rebuilding, insists Musk, is by design.
“xAI was not built right first time around, so is being rebuilt from the foundations up,” Musk said Thursday on his social media platform, X. By most measures, it isn’t going all that smoothly.
The most immediate pressure is competitive. This week, xAI co-founders Zihang Dai and Guodong Zhang left the outfit after Musk complained that the company’s AI coding tools were not effectively competing with Claude Code or Codex, rival programming assistants made by Anthropic and OpenAI, respectively. Musk said the company held an all-hands meeting on Wednesday that focused on how to catch up, which he predicted would be possible by the middle of this year.
Coding tools matter so much because they’re where the money is. While an early-year surge of users was powered by xAI’s lax regulation of Grok’s ability to produce sexual and even abusive imagery, coding tools are seen as the key revenue-generating tech for AI labs. That makes xAI’s current lag in this area more than a perception issue; it’s a business problem.
Advertisement
The personnel overhaul extends well beyond this week. A month ago, 11 senior engineers at xAI, including two co-founders, left the company following changes Musk described as a reorganization to suit a larger business. That effort was apparently insufficient: The Financial Times reported that SpaceX and Tesla executives have parachuted into the company to evaluate employees and fire those who don’t make the grade.
The two remaining co-founders, Manuel Kroiss and Ross Nordeen, along with Musk, have their work cut out for them.
Musk is now casting a wider net for talent. On Thursday, he said on X that he and another colleage, Baris Akis, are currently reviewing rejected employment applications in the company, with an eye toward reaching out to promising candidates who should have had a chance to interview. “My apologies,” Musk added, addressing the pile of strangers he’d ghosted.
Techcrunch event
Advertisement
San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026
For the sake of comparison, LinkedIn reports that xAI has just over 5,000 employees, compared to more than 7,500 at OpenAI and more than 4,700 at Anthropic.
Advertisement
On the hiring front, there’s at least one encouraging sign. Andrew Milich and Jason Ginsberg are joining xAI from the AI coding tool company Cursor, where the two held joint responsibility for product engineering. Unlike xAI, Cursor depends on frontier labs for access to the AI models it runs on. Their decision to join xAI may signal the importance of direct access to LLM and computing resources to run them — and suggest that xAI’s core asset, its own frontier model, is still an attractive draw.
Either way, the pressure to show results is as much external as it is internal. Now that xAI is part of SpaceX, and with a public offering of SpaceX shares anticipated, the cash-burning unit is under pressure to demonstrate real uptake on Grok, its LLM. (A stumbling AI division is not the story Musk needs investors to be reading.)
Longer term, Musk is betting on something bigger than coding tools. xAI’s Macrohard project — Musk is convinced the name is “a funny reference to Microsoft” — aims to create an AI agent capable of doing anything a white-collar worker can do on a computer. Toby Pohlen, chosen to lead the project in February, left within weeks, and this week, Business Insider reported that Macrohard was on pause.
Musk’s response has been to draft another of his companies into the project. He revealed for the first time that Macrohard is a joint effort with Tesla, which is also developing a complementary agent dubbed “Digital Optimus” — a reference to Tesla’s Optimus humanoid robot. In Musk’s description, the xAI language model would direct the Tesla agent as it performs tasks.
Advertisement
It’s ambitious; it’s also not unique. Instead, the vision is not far off from what Perplexity — an AI-powered search engine — is doing with its new “Everything is Computer” offering, which aims to offer enterprise users a dedicated “digital proxy” that can orchestrate their digital tasks. It also echoes what entrepreneur Peter Steinberger is now working on at OpenAI, after creating OpenClaw’s popular personal agents.
The ReSHAPE platform, using AI, enables professionals to retrain, upskill and ‘future-proof’ their careers.
The Technological University of Shannon (TUS) in Athlone has launched the Regional Skills Horizon and Pathways to Employment (ReSHAPE) platform, which is an AI-powered digital platform developed to support professionals based in Ireland’s midlands region, supporting economic development in regions such as Laois, Offaly, Longford and Westmeath.
ReSHAPE is a collaboration between Munster Technological University (MTU), TUS and the University of Limerick (UL) and is part of a strategic initiative aiming to deliver education, training and skills development opportunities.
Users of the platform will be able to undertake a skills audit, identify transferable skills and access funded training opportunities. Employers can use the platform to identify organisational skills gaps and create workforce development strategies. Reportedly, the programme is designed to support thousands of learners across the midlands.
Advertisement
Commenting on the launch, Prof Vincent Cunnane, the president of TUS, said: “The platform represents a transformative opportunity for workers and employers across the region. ReSHAPE provides a powerful new tool to help individuals understand their capabilities and connect with education pathways that support sustainable careers in a rapidly evolving economy.
“The midlands is entering a new phase of economic transformation and ensuring people have access to the right skills at the right time is critical.”
Prof Maggie Cusack, the president of MTU added: “The collaboration between universities and industry partners was key to ensuring the platform delivers meaningful impact. ReSHAPE brings together education providers, industry and communities to ensure skills development is aligned with real workforce needs.
“By combining data-driven insights with accessible training pathways, the platform will help thousands of people across the midlands build the skills needed for the jobs of the future. ReSHAPE is also demonstrating that collaboration across higher education, industry and government can support better, evidence-based skills planning at a national level.”
Advertisement
Also in the midlands, Danish drug-maker Novo Nordisk recently announced a €432m investment at its Athlone-based plant to advance its manufacturing capacity for GLP-1 drugs. The Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment Peter Burke, TD called the news, “a vote of confidence in Athlone, the midlands and the skilled workforce we have worked hard to develop”.
He said: “It will help drive innovation, create highly skilled jobs and further strengthen Ireland’s pharmaceutical ecosystem.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Whovians, rejoice. The BBC is about to unlock a piece of Doctor Who history that even the TARDIS might have forgotten. Two lost episodes of Doctor Who, the iconic sci-fi series, will broadcast in April, the showrunner for the current season confirmed.
The two 1965 episodes, The Nightmare Begins and Devil’s Planet, were donated to the charitable trust Film Is Fabulous by the estate of an anonymous collector.
“The collector did recognize what he had, but how he acquired them has been lost to time,” Professor Justin Smith Leicester of De Montfort University, who led the recovery effort, told the broadcaster.
Advertisement
The researchers said that while most of the donor’s private collection was destroyed by water damage, the Doctor Who episodes were intact.
Doctor Who showrunner, Russell T Davies, celebrated the news on Instagram and said the episodes would air in the UK in April, though no US air date has been announced yet.
“Lost for 61 years! Best of all, these will be made available for FREE on the BBC iPlayer in April,” Davies wrote.
Advertisement
He expressed gratitude to Film Is Fabulous for finding the lost episodes and encouraged people to donate to the registered charity. “Maybe they’ll find more! As the Doctor says… ‘Daleks!’”
The episodes feature the first incarnation of the Doctor, played by William Hartnell, and a typical Dalek plot to take over Earth and the galaxy.
In the 1960s and 1970s, the BBC had a policy of destroying film or reusing videotapes, leading to dozens of episodes of Doctor Who and other popular UK shows like Dad’s Army and Top of the Pops going missing.
Old Doctor Who episodes do surface occasionally, and in 2016, the newly discovered soundtrack for one storyline was turned into an animated series called The Power of the Daleks.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Disney ended its working relationship with the BBC last year, and star Ncuti Gatwa left the show. However, the UK broadcaster says that Doctor Who will continue, and Russell T Davies is working on a new Christmas special.