Dell’s 52-inch enormo-monitor is a tsunami of impractical fun

FIRST LOOK Dell’s UltraSharp 52 display is a joyously enormous head-turner, but probably too much monitor for most users.

Dell debuted the display at the CES show earlier this year. It’s now on sale for $3,000.

Sadly, I lack a PC capable of driving the screen at its full 6144 x 2560 resolution and 120 Hz refresh rate. Even at a miserly 3840 x 2160, however, I often marveled at how much it could display. Consider the screenshot below, which shows 50 columns and 89 rows of a single Excel spreadsheet – 4,450 cells in total.

Here’s another look at the monitor in full flight: a screen grab of Zwift, the virtual cycling metaverse I visit regularly as part of my exercise routine. At that size, Zwift felt more immersive and enjoyable than it does on a smaller screen. The display also handled motion smoothly during Zwift. other games, and streamed video.

Getting used to it

It took me a while to appreciate the monitor. When I first plugged it in, my occasionally-stiff middle-aged neck strained as I swiveled to view content at the edges and corners, while wielding my mouse to move its pointer between the screen’s extremities felt like flapping my arms.

My eyes didn’t enjoy the experience at first either. I wear mild reading glasses while working, and found myself repeatedly refocusing as I looked across the curved display.

For the first few days I spent with the screen, I therefore practiced “pillarboxing” – running the display at 3840 x 2160 and only using the center of the monitor while pixels on the edges remained dark. That didn’t feel odd or distracting, perhaps because I often use “letterboxing” while watching video on my TV or tablet – leaving pixels at the top and bottom of the screen unused.

As I grew accustomed to the enormo-monitor, I began using its entire area. Getting there was not straightforward: each of the three PCs I used with the monitor (one at a time, not together) required manual adjustment before I found a resolution that did not distort text and images.

Dell’s companion app was no help. It was slow to install, ran as if stuck in digital treacle, and is little more than a glorified front end for the Windows System/Display control panel.

The HDMI connection to my desktop – an Acemagic mini-PC – repeatedly dropped out, forcing me to reseat the cable every day. The same PC and cable work reliably with my everyday monitor. I tried another cable and the problem persisted. I reached out to Dell, who suggested my two different cables were to blame.

I connected my laptop – a Dell Inspiron Plus 7441 – over Thunderbolt and experienced some flickering that went away without needing to reseat the cable. A ten-year-old ThinkPad Carbon X1 connected fine over HDMI, but had even more trouble finding appropriate settings.

But once I got the machine going and got used to its colossal size, my initial fatigue vanished. I realized I was squinting a little less than I do with my everyday display, a seven-year-old 32-inch Samsung that lacks the HDR feature the Dell machine includes.

I sometimes use my lunch breaks to watch some rugby highlights, and the display handled those with ease. The easily observable nuances of small ads on team shirts would doubtless please sponsors.

I was also pleasantly surprised by the display’s speakers, which rendered my favorite tunes brightly and crisply. My current high rotation tunes include guitar feedback legends The Jesus and Mary Chain, spiky garage pop from Welsh outfit The Bug Club, and mumbly “power disco” by Getdown Services.  JAMC’s trademark fuzz was warm and deep, I felt like I could hear new strings on The Bug Club’s guitars, and Getdown Services’ beats thumped meatily.

The speakers’ location at the rear of the monitor led to a few “Where’s that sound coming from?” moments, but those quickly became tolerable.

Weighty issues

I was impressed by Dell’s packaging, which places the cables and included stand in clearly marked cardboard compartments within the shell protecting the screen. That matters because the box is a whopper that would be difficult to lug out of an IKEA and into a small car. Easy access to the assembly parts means a little less wrestling.

At 12.95 kg (28.5 lbs), the monitor isn’t problematically heavy – but is maybe too weighty for Dell’s stand, as it never sat perfectly level, and I could find no way to straighten it. The screen is also unwieldy: I recommend connecting any cables you plan to use in advance, because shifting and lifting it to access its ports is not easy, especially in constricted spaces behind a desk.

Tucked under the monitor’s bottom-left edge is a forward-facing USB hub with two USB-C ports and one USB-A port. Making one of them a Thunderbolt port would have made it easier to connect a laptop without rummaging behind the beast.

I finished my time with this giant display convinced that it is a lovely machine, but not one I need, as my work consists mostly of writing and editing text and browsing the web. Those who work with visual material may adore its size and the immersion created by its gentle curve. Many of Dell’s promotional images show the device displaying multiple financial data feeds. The company pitches it as a replacement for four smaller monitors, requiring only one power cable and dispensing with a complex collection of stands.

That seems like a more sensible use of the screen than everyday knowledge work.

To finish, here’s one more photo. I started working from home in 2002 but had no room to dedicate to an office. I therefore splurged about $700 – big bucks at the time – on a 15-inch, 1024 x 768 Dell 1503FP LCD monitor so that a CRT did not dominate my lounge room.

It still works, although when the time came to take this snap, I couldn’t find the HDMI-to-VGA adapter I use to fire it up.

Here it is anyway, posed in front of its giant descendant to offer some historical perspective on how monitors have grown. ®