Dutton Ranch star claims they ‘didn’t see any disruption’ on set following Chad Feehan’s exit from Yellowstone spinoff fueled by Taylor Sheridan clash rumors
In April 2026 — a month before Dutton Ranch made its Paramount+ debut — it was reported that showrunner Chad Feehan had exited the series following alleged “behind-the-scenes friction with series stars Cole Hauser and Kelly Reilly, as well as ‘other key players’ such as Taylor Sheridan.”
Puck News added, “Feehan finished the first season but has been told he won’t return for the second, per three sources. (I think the feeling was mutual and Feehan likely would have bailed anyway.)
“This was less of a pure creative issue, I’m told — the scripts were good, and after some work on the cut, Paramount is confident in the show — and more about how Feehan ran the production. Sheridan, producer David Glasser, and the stars weren’t happy, so Feehan’s out, and Sheridan and Glasser will likely elevate another season 1 writer to the showrunner gig.”
Advertisement
Latest Videos From
Hauser cryptically denied any friction exclusively to TechRadar, explaining before the show’s premiere, “Taylor’s got his hands all over this show. That’s the only way he knows how to do things.
“Look, you’re gonna go through your ups and downs, through this business, and it’s about adapting. That’s what we did.”
Five episodes of the Yellowstone spinoff down and another star has come to Hauser’s aide, claiming that there was “no disruption” while stars were on set.
Advertisement
‘As actors, we’re there to complete the task’
Dutton Ranch | Official Trailer | Paramount+ – YouTube
“Not at all,” Berto Colón, who plays Miguel on Dutton Ranch, confirms when I ask if he felt as though the Chad Feehan rumors had any truth to them.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
“I met Chad a bunch of times, but I don’t know what the deal is. That’s something that’s above my pay grade. As actors, we’re there to make sure that we complete a task and to make sure we complete it as truthfully as possible.
He continues, “The ongoings that happen behind the scenes is something that I’m not involved with, but as far as energy and what we did, everyone who came on board, tuned into what the story needed to be like.”
“I didn’t see any disruption of that process. I just love everyone there. I love what that they’re about.”
Advertisement
As Dutton Ranch season 2 hasn’t been confirmed as of writing, we’re yet to see which new showrunner would step into Feehan’s shoes. Rumors suggest a lead writer would be picked from the job, but if you’ve followed my week-on-week coverage, you’ll know that I’m advocating for Sheridan to resume the position himself (he’s currently an executive producer).
As for a renewal, Colón says “There needs to be a continuation to this. I don’t have any actual carnal knowledge of that, I just know that the numbers speak for themselves. If any show deserves a few more seasons, it’s this one.”
Dutton Ranch will continue airing its first nine episodes until July 3.
The European Commission has accused TikTok of falling short on protecting minors, saying the platform’s current account settings don’t meet the child safety standards required under the Digital Services Act (DSA). The findings are preliminary, but if upheld, TikTok could face a fine of up to 6% of its global annual revenue.
Why the EU thinks TikTok isn’t doing enough
According to the Commission, TikTok allows minors to set their accounts to public, making their content visible to anyone — including people without a TikTok account. Regulators also say that content posted by older teenagers (aged 16 and 17) can still be recommended to other users through the For You feed, increasing the risk of unwanted contact, cyberbullying, or exploitation.
Unsplash
The Commission argues that stronger privacy protections for children should be enabled by default, rather than relying on users to change their settings manually. It also wants content from minors’ public accounts to be visible only to approved TikTok followers instead of being accessible to a broader audience, while recommending that minors’ content should not appear in the For You feed for other users.
EU Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy Henna Virkkunen said protecting minors online should never be optional, adding that platforms are expected to build child safety into their services by design rather than offering it as an opt-in feature.
What TikTok said
TikTok has pushed back against the findings, saying it shares the Commission’s goal of protecting young users and already offers more than 50 privacy and safety features for teens. As reported by Reuters, the company notes that accounts for users under 18 are private by default, while younger teens cannot use direct messaging and their content is not recommended in the For You feed. TikTok says it will review the Commission’s findings and continue working with regulators before a final decision is reached.
Advertisement
Bryan M. Wolfe / Digital Trends
The Commission’s announcement represents preliminary findings, meaning TikTok now has the opportunity to formally respond before the EU decides whether the company has violated the DSA. If regulators remain unconvinced, they could issue a non-compliance decision along with financial penalties. The investigation is one of several ongoing DSA probes into TikTok as European regulators continue tightening oversight of how large social media platforms protect younger users online
Canon registered three new EOS R cameras. Rumours point to a retro-styled R8 II (digital AE-1), an R7 II with Canon’s first stacked APS-C sensor, and an R10 II. All expected H2 2026.
Canon has registered three new cameras with wireless certification agencies, a step that typically signals imminent announcements. Rumours point to updates across Canon’s mid-range mirrorless lineup: the EOS R8 II, EOS R7 II, and EOS R10 II. All three are expected in the second half of 2026. The most interesting is the R8 II, which may arrive in mid-September with retro styling inspired by the Canon AE-1, a legendary 1976 film SLR that turns 50 this year.
The AE-1 was one of the most popular cameras ever made, beloved by amateur photographers for its accessible design. Nikon already proved the retro-digital formula works with the Zf, and Canon has reportedly been working on a similar concept for years. The rumoured R8 II specs include a 32.5MP full-frame sensor, 40fps electronic shutter burst, in-body image stabilisation, oversampled 4K video, and two SD card slots, up from one on the original R8. Whether the retro styling is cosmetic or extends to film-style image processing modes remains unclear.
The EOS R7 II may be more significant technically. It is rumoured to feature Canon’s first stacked APS-C sensor, a design that moves circuitry behind the sensor for faster readout, enabling higher burst speeds and blackout-free viewfinder shooting. Currently, only Fujifilm’s X-H2S offers a stacked APS-C sensor. Resolution may increase from 32.5MP to 39MP. The EOS R10 II, Canon’s beginner model, is expected with improved autofocus and a deeper burst buffer but fewer dramatic changes.
Advertisement
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
None of this is confirmed. Canon has not announced anything beyond the wireless certifications. The memory crisis has pushed component costs higher across consumer electronics, and Canon’s ability to price these cameras competitively will depend on how much the DRAM shortage has affected sensor and processing costs. Apple raised iPhone 17 prices 10% in Japan due to currency and component pressure, and camera manufacturers face the same headwinds. Three registrations in one batch suggests Canon is planning a coordinated launch, not a staggered rollout. The AE-1 anniversary gives them until the end of the year to make it count.
Electrolyte powders, dissolvable tablets, and trendy ready-to-drink waters have graduated from the pockets of athletes to one of wellness’s buzziest categories.
And it’s a crowded market, worth an estimated $39 billion globally in 2025 and forecast to double within the next decade. Much of the growth has been fueled by wellness trends and influencer-fronted hype cycles, like Prime Hydration, created by YouTubers Logan Paul and KSI, which the company claimed pushed past $1 billion in sales in a single year. In other internet corners, dozens of celebrity and podcaster-adjacent brands are all promising a means of optimizing your way to hydration.
These products are marketed as daily essentials for everyone—from office workers to gym regulars—promising to combat brain fog, improve skin, banish fatigue, and aid recovery. Here’s everything you need to know about the electrolyte obsession, and when these products are actually worth buying.
What Are Electrolytes?
Electrolytes are essential minerals, among them sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and chloride, that carry an electrical charge once dissolved in fluid. That charge is what lets the body do much of its basic work, such as helping muscles and nerves work correctly. They work to ensure fluid stays balanced inside and outside every cell, as a serious imbalance can cause headaches, muscle cramps, dizziness, fatigue, and weakness. In more serious cases, severe electrolyte imbalances can interfere with heart function and require medical treatment.
Advertisement
Who Needs Electrolytes?
For most healthy adults, the body has been regulating electrolyte levels perfectly well long before trendy, flavored hydration sticks landed on supermarket shelves. In fact, if you eat a reasonably balanced diet and drink water when you’re thirsty, there’s a good chance you’re already getting everything you need.
The sachet earns its place in roughly three situations. Studies from the American College of Sports Medicine suggest that water alone is sufficient for exercise lasting less than an hour, but electrolytes become increasingly useful during longer sessions of prolonged, sweat-heavy exercise, particularly in high temperatures or humidity. They’re also useful for illness involving heavy fluid loss, which is why oral rehydration salts are a recognized medical treatment rather than a wellness trend. And you should also consider them during long stretches of fasting, when the food that usually supplies these minerals is absent.
Are There Natural Electrolytes?
There are many sources of electrolytes in everyday foods. If you’re eating a reasonably varied diet (fruits, vegetables, lean protein, whole grains, nuts, seeds), your electrolyte stores are continually being topped up without the need for specialist drinks or powders.
Research by the Beverage Hydration Index shows that milk-based drinks can maintain hydration for longer than plain water. The combination of protein, natural electrolytes and small amounts of fat slows the rate at which fluid leaves the stomach, helping the body retain hydration for longer. Coconut water too can replenish potassium.
Advertisement
The Nutrition Source from Harvard’s School of Public Health notes that, essentially, “any beverage containing electrolyte minerals may be labeled an electrolyte drink. Some are very costly yet only contain a small amount of these nutrients, while others may contain a high amount of only one nutrient such as potassium or sodium.”
Can You Have Too Many Electrolytes?
For healthy adults, an occasional electrolyte drink is unlikely to cause harm. Daily consumption, however, can sometimes be counterproductive.
Many electrolyte products contain significant amounts of sodium, despite the fact that most populations already consume considerably more salt than recommended. The World Health Organization estimates the global average of sodium intake a day is more than double its recommended limit and roughly 1.89 million deaths a year can be linked to excess intake. Regularly adding extra sodium may not be ideal for anyone managing high blood pressure or cardiovascular risk. Some formulations also contain substantial amounts of added sugar, making them nutritionally closer to soft drinks than health products.
Anyone recovering from illness or sweating through an August shift outdoors has a fair case for supplementing. For everyone else, the best approach to hydration remains an unremarkable one. Electrolytes themselves are nonnegotiable. Electrolyte products are mostly just a lifestyle purchase.
Samsung Galaxy Unpacked took place earlier in the week, and amongst the key launches we the got a look at a brand new compact foldable: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8. This clamshell phone is Samsung’s slimmest and lightest Flip yet, measuring just 6.1mm thick when folded, and weighing in at 180g.
Preorders are open now, and if you’ve decided this is the phone for you, now’s a great time to get a case sorted. Below, I’ve rounded up a selection of my favorites in the US and in the UK. I’ve focused on reputable brands like Otterbox, Spigen and Casetify, alongside Samsung’s official offerings, but I’ve also mixed in a handful of Amazon options for those seeking something cheaper. As a relatively niche launch, there isn’t the usual glut of cases to choose from, but I was pleasantly surprised to see a decent range available.
When making your selection, keep in mind what you need from a case. Do you want the toughest case, with reinforced corners, to keep your foldable safe from bumps and scratches? Are you seeking a fun designs that lets you express some personality? Or do you need something minimalist that lets the phone itself take center stage? I’ve also included a number of MagSafe options.
Advertisement
Scroll down to browse my favorite Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 cases and covers, to keep your new clamshell safe and looking great.
US cases for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
Advertisement
UK cases for the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Politico reports that in the Virginia area alone there’s dozens of data center projects “that altogether need 70 gigawatts of power — equivalent to 70 nuclear plants” — currently seeking connection to their grid. But there’s also concerns about a Virginia data center powered with natural gas and backup diesel generators:
When Virginia’s top environmental regulator received an analysis warning of data center pollution, it took him less than five minutes to forward it to seven people on his staff… Internal emails obtained by POLITICO through a public records request paint a portrait of an agency that moved quickly to defend the only data center in Virginia that is powering itself — in what former officials and environmental health advocates described as an unusual effort to shape the debate around an industry whose global epicenter is in the state. The agency’s pushback focused on the report’s findings that the facility in Loudoun County could release harmful amounts of air pollution through eight bus-sized natural gas turbines — as allowed by permits granted by the Department of Environmental Quality [DEQ] itself… The request comes as data centers are devising new ways to produce their own power as a way to temper growing public discord over rising electricity prices amid the AI construction boom.
Virginia has more than 600 data centers. The report [commissioned by Virginia’s 54-year-old environmental nonprofit Piedmont Environmental Council] raised concerns that the data center’s on-site power system, which also includes dozens of backup diesel generators, could cause tens of millions of dollars in health damages to people living around the facility, owned by Vantage Data Centers… [The analysis also argued the pollution could lead to 3.4 to 6.5 premature deaths annually.] People living near the Vantage facility in Sterling say its natural gas turbines produce constant noise and air pollution. The permits for Vantage issued by DEQ in 2023 allow cumulative emissions of seven different pollutants, including 95 tons per year of nitrogen oxides and more than 56 tons of soot. Both contribute to asthma and heart attacks.
Those figures are in line with other state permits for minor sources of pollution, but DEQ’s permits for Vantage have sparked local concerns because of the facility’s location in a residential area… [Viriginia environmental quality officials] raised questions about whether the report wrongly described the facility’s potential air pollution as dangerous, when soot levels in Loudoun County are deemed acceptable by America’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Health experts, including former EPA air quality official Michael Korber, told POLITICO that soot pollution can negatively affect human health even at EPA-approved levels. The World Health Organization’s standard for ambient soot pollution is nearly half of what EPA suggests is safe. Some current and former staffers on Virginia’s Department of Environmental Quality believe it’s inappropriate for the agency to issue aggressive statements on the healthfulness of the data centers, with one former department leader saying Virginia’s DEQ “is not the health department.”
I’ve been following the Minimal Phone since its initial crowdfunding days. The first iteration had the right idea trapped inside the wrong body, I’d say. Plastic build, no 5G, an underwhelming camera, and e-paper ghosting that frustrated early adopters; all these issues kept the phone from reaching a wider audience.
Now, founder Armen Youssefian has posted what appears to be a 360-degree render of the Minimal Phone 2 on X, and from what I can see, the team has done its homework.
@Youkhna / X
What do the renders actually reveal about the MP02’s design?
Quite a bit, actually. The phone will be available in two colors: a clean silver and a matte black. To me, the MP02 immediately looks like a more premium device. The rounded corners and the polished metallic frame running around the display give it that iPhone 5s energy, though it’s a bit wider.
Flip it over, and you get a minimal back panel with a single camera and the Minimal Company’s signature dot logo at the bottom right. No camera bump, no cluttered array, just clean, intentional design.
Up front, the iconic full QWERTY keyboard returns, which is visibly refined from the original’s 35-key layout. The keyboard section appears to sit in a slightly recessed area, which yet again reminds me of another classic: the BlackBerry phones.
Advertisement
Is the MP02 actually getting 5G this time?
Minimal Company’s co-founder Andre Youssefian also teased the next Minimal Phone on X, calling it the “world’s smallest 5G QWERTY physical keyboard phone.” That confirms the arrival of 5G cellular connectivity on the device, one of the biggest complaints surrounding the original model.
However, neither co-founder has revealed any other specifications of the Minimal Phone 2 yet. An early-access waitlist is live on the company’s official website; that’s currently the only concrete commitment the company has made, though. That’s why I’d move ahead with cautious optimism.
What Minimal Phone 2 could do differently is bring genuine Android utility to that space in a premium package. I’d say that the design ambition is there, but it will be the specs that decide whether the execution follows.
Also high on list of reasons to buy the Mission 1 Pro is that, in my experience, when properly color graded, footage from the Mission 1 Pro pairs seamlessly with footage from any other camera. This is especially true in good light, but overall the look of footage is leaps and bounds beyond the Hero 13. Some combination of the bigger sensor, better lens, 10-bit GP-Log2, and higher bit rate leads to more cinematic looking footage than I’ve seen coming out of an action camera.
Other great improvements include support for fast charging. You can get to 80 percent in about 20 minutes, fully charged in just over 30 minutes. Battery life is great too, I managed about 3 hours shooting 4K 24fps. I was also impressed to see that the battery itself, while bigger, is backwards compatible with the Hero 13 and vice versa, which is a nice touch if you happen to have quite a few extra batteries lying around (and let’s be honest, what GoPro user doesn’t).
The low light performance is also a highlight. I don’t need a camera that sees in the dark, but it’s nice to be able to shoot in twilight and get usable results. For all the ballyhoo about how bad low light performance is in older GoPros, I never found it all that limiting, but if you did, the Mission 1 Pro is your camera. I’m happy to report that GoPro has exercised considerable restraint with the new Low Light mode, there is none of the heavy processing and weird artifacts that often plague low-light modes.
Out of the box with the default color profile the Low Light mode in the Mission 1 Pro most closely matches with you get from the Insta360 Ace Pro 2, which is really solid. But don’t forget that the real power of the Mission 1 Pro comes from shooting GP-Log. When you do that in low light, and then color grade yourself, the results are better than any other action camera I’ve tried. My one gripe is that you can’t control noise reduction in Low Light mode.
Advertisement
There’s way too much to cover in a short review like this, but it’s worth saying that audio is improved, with more mics, the rear screen is slightly bigger, and the settings menus are more extensive and easier to customize. It’s also worth calling out that GoPro Lab has alternative firmware for the Mission 1 Pro, which enables quite a few interesting features, including up to 300 Mbps video.
What’s Not So Great
Photograph: Scott Gilbertson
To get the most out of the Mission 1 Pro you’re going to want to post process your video. It needs to be edited and color graded to pull the most value out of what you can shoot with the Mission 1 Pro. This makes perfect sense given that it’s partly aimed at pro filmmakers who are naturally going to edit and color grade their footage. If you go this route, you will end up with better looking movies than what you’ll get from any other action camera. The downside is that this is a lot of work. I’ve joked in quite a few WIRED guides that I have a massive amount of video footage sitting on hard drives waiting for me to edit it. I really do, and I still haven’t got around to editing it.
The audio community is far from perfect, but it has a long history of taking care of its own. Much of that support happens behind the scenes through donations, replacement equipment, introductions and favors that readers will never hear about. Some people are more generous than others, but when a respected small company gets knocked flat, the community usually responds.
Capra Audio now needs that help. According to a GoFundMe organized by family friend Morgan Andreychuk, Brian Hayden and his family were forced to take refuge on the second floor of their West Virginia home before being rescued at 2 a.m. The flooding reportedly submerged their vehicles, 3D printers, servers and much of the inventory used to operate Capra Audio.
The company has earned a strong reputation within the headphone community for its replacement comfort headbands and 3D-printed headphone designs. A GoFundMe has been launched to help the family rebuild both its home and livelihood.
The disaster comes only days after a major fire caused extensive damage to Artnovion, the Portuguese manufacturer of acoustic treatments for high-end audio, home theater and professional spaces. The July 15 fire destroyed one building in its Sobrosa warehouse complex after the roof collapsed, although no injuries were reported.
Advertisement
Different countries. Different disasters. The same reminder that behind every specialist audio brand are real people, families and livelihoods that can disappear in a matter of hours.
Who Is Capra Audio?
We’ve all been there: you unpack a new pair of headphones and love the way they sound, but they’re too uncomfortable to wear for more than 10 minutes. You return them, find a comfortable pair, and breathe a sigh of relief. Then disaster strikes a year later: the headband tears, disintegrates, or otherwise fails.
Capra Audio began as a one-man operation created to give headphone owners the freedom to repair failed headbands while improving comfort in the process. The company now offers an impressive range of replacement and upgraded headbands at surprisingly reasonable prices.
Advertisement
A small subset of Capra Audio’s products, for sale on CapraAudio.com
Who Cares About Headbands?
You may never have experienced a failed headphone headband, but companies like Capra Audio still matter. Headphone manufacturers are under no obligation to sell replacement headbands or continue offering them once a model has been discontinued.
Capra Audio’s aftermarket solutions are valuable not only from a comfort perspective, but also from an ownership one. Rather than throwing away an otherwise functional pair of headphones because a simple, inexpensive part has failed, owners can replace the headband and extend the life of their headphones considerably.
More Than Just Headbands
Capra Audio is run by one person: Brian Hayden. A genuine headphone enthusiast, his work extends well beyond designing improved replacement headbands. Brian also creates complete headphones from scratch and releases the designs for free.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
Anyone with access to a 3D printer can download the files and build the headphones at home. Capra Audio currently offers five models through Printables.com, including the notable Satyr 4.
3D printed headphones, or DIY headphones in general, will not appeal to everyone, but they can be a lot of fun to build and modify. If you already own a 3D printer and have some spare cash for dynamic drivers and the necessary hardware, why not give one a shot?
Capra Audio Satyr 4. Credit: Capra Audio
How Can You Help?
Capra Audio is not a giant corporation with warehouses full of replacement inventory. It is Brian Hayden, his family, and a small business that has earned the trust of headphone enthusiasts by solving problems larger manufacturers often ignore.
The GoFundMe has already raised over $19,000 toward its $30,000 goal through 202 donations, but there is still considerable ground to cover. The money will help with relocation, essential equipment, lost inventory, and rebuilding both the family home and Capra Audio.
Advertisement
Donations matter, but sharing the fundraiser can also put it in front of someone who is able to help. The audio community takes care of its own. This is one of those moments when showing up actually matters.
In context: When a market is utterly dominated by a single player as AI infrastructure has been by Nvidia, it’s tough for any rival to make a dent. No company knows this better than AMD. They’ve been battling in many segments against Nvidia, as well as other semiconductor giants like Intel, for decades now.
That challenge hasn’t deterred AMD. If anything, it seems to have sharpened the company’s focus. At its recent Advancing AI event in San Francisco, AMD rolled out an unusually dense wave of announcements spanning AI infrastructure for the cloud and enterprise data centers, AI-powered client devices, and physical AI for robotics.
AMD first previewed Helios at last year’s event, but actually shipping it is an important step, both philosophically and practically. Nvidia has trained the market to expect rack- and datacenter-scale solutions as table stakes for AI infrastructure, and without a shipping rack product of its own, AMD was at a real disadvantage. With Helios shipments now set to begin later this quarter, AMD can credibly call itself a serious contender in AI infrastructure, and organizations shopping for the technology now have a legitimate alternative to weigh.
Advertisement
That new confidence was reflected in the customers and partners AMD paraded on stage. From Anthropic and OpenAI on the frontier-model side to Meta and enterprise customers like AT&T, there was a genuine sense of energy and partnership running through the event.
CEO Lisa Su went out of her way to highlight how closely AMD had co-designed Helios with its earliest customers, a reminder of how much it pays to actually listen to what buyers want before finalizing a product.
AMD didn’t stop at building a credible alternative; it also made some aggressive claims about outperforming the competition outright.
How well benchmark claims translate to real-world performance is always hard to judge in advance, but AMD touted 20% greater per-core performance for its latest Epyc CPUs over Nvidia’s new Vera CPU, among other figures.
Advertisement
The company also highlighted Helios’s larger HBM4 memory capacity and faster memory bandwidth compared with similar Nvidia rack systems. However those numbers hold up once independent, third-party benchmarks arrive, it’s fair to say AMD is now offering a hardware alternative to Nvidia. For customers chasing low-latency inference, AMD also announced a partnership with Cerebras that will let a Cerebras rack sit side by side with a Helios rack for demanding workloads.
Of course, AI infrastructure is about more than hardware, and one of the more intriguing announcements from Advancing AI was a new version of AMD’s software stack, called ROCm.ai. It’s designed to use AI-assisted programming to make building software optimized for AMD hardware significantly easier – including, for example, porting code originally written in CUDA over to ROCm.
Given Nvidia’s roughly two-decade head start with CUDA, a wholesale industry shift won’t happen overnight, but it does make the so-called “CUDA moat” look less daunting than it once did. A ROCm.ai feature called Hyperloom, purpose-built to optimize AI applications for ROCm, looks particularly compelling: at the event, Anthropic described how an engineer let Claude run autonomously over a single weekend to adapt and tune performance on an AMD Instinct MI355X chip – and came back Monday to a working, steadily improving performance curve.
Beyond the data center, AMD also had something to say about PCs and robotics. On the PC side, the company detailed a new AI-focused deskside computing device, codenamed Gorgon Halo, built on an enhanced version of its Ryzen AI Max APU that pairs a Zen 5 CPU with an RDNA 3.5 GPU.
Advertisement
The device will offer up to 192GB of unified memory, at a price still to be determined but likely steep given current DRAM costs. Even so, it’s an interesting entry in the growing class of developer-focused AI systems hitting the market.
More surprising was a new partnership with Cisco to bring AI agent management, observability, and tokenomics tools to this class of device. Leveraging Cisco’s Cloud Control, AI Defense, and Splunk technologies, the joint solution is aimed at organizations planning to deploy AI-focused PCs at scale.
Details are still thin, but it’s a notable partnership that shows how AMD and Cisco are working to bring more comprehensive AI tooling to the enterprise.
Finally, AMD made several announcements in physical AI and robotics. Few people realize AMD has had a substantial presence in industrial robotics for years, largely thanks to the technology it picked up when it acquired Xilinx in 2022.
Advertisement
The kind of reprogrammable FPGAs Xilinx has built for years are essential to many robotics systems, both for adapting to new AI algorithms and for sensor fusion – tying together the camera and sensor feeds most robots rely on. Combined with AMD’s traditional CPUs and GPUs, that gives the company a broad portfolio to draw from.
The result is the new Kria AI SOM, a system-on-module, and the Kria AI Robotics Developer Platform that pairs it with a carrier board for robotics designs. Both are built around AMD’s Ryzen AI Embedded X100 series SoCs, alongside new open-source Kria AI Robotics Platform software. Together, it’s a comprehensive toolkit for robotics developers and further cements AMD’s role as a significant player in the field.
Nvidia will almost certainly remain the AI infrastructure leader for the foreseeable future, but it’s now clear AMD has come to play, and that’s good news for everyone. As in any market, competition drives faster, better advancements, and it will be worth watching how the AI semiconductor landscape continues to evolve from here.
Bob O’Donnell is the founder and chief analyst of TECHnalysis Research, LLC a technology consulting firm that provides strategic consulting and market research services to the technology industry and professional financial community. You can follow him on Twitter @bobodtech
Raspberry Pi’s new 10.1-inch Touch Display 2 lands at $80 with a 1200 × 1920 IPS panel and ten-finger touch, sitting above the $40 5-inch and $60 7-inch models
The upgrade breaks backward compatibility, extending compatibility with the Raspberry Pi 5 and Compute Modules only, ruling out Pi 4 and earlier as well as the entire Zero lineup
The 10.1-inch Touch 2 also offers an IPS display that offers viewing angles of 85 degrees, matched by the 7-inch variant, even as the 5-inch variant clocks in a bit lower at 80 degrees
The Raspberry Pi 5 is a surprisingly capable device, and it finally has an “official” 10-inch display that can hold a candle to its capabilities.
While the new Touch Display 2 has already had 5-inch and 7-inch offerings, the 10-inch variant is new, offering a slew of upgrades under the hood even as it cuts down on peak brightness to go with the larger display.
It is also the first Touch Display that leaves most of the Raspberry Pi installed base behind, essentially scrapping support for older Raspberry Pi options as well as its current Zero lineup.
Latest Videos FromTechRadar
The 10.1-inch Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2 (Image credit: Raspberry Pi Foundation)
Advertisement
A new display with compromises for a limited user base
While the 10-inch Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2’s announcement is direct about the incompatibility, explaining that the higher resolution needs four DSI lanes and the newer connector is found only on Raspberry Pi 5 and Compute Module IO boards, it says nothing about what that means in practice.
The restriction effectively cuts off a large segment of the user base that runs older Raspberry Pi models, as well as anyone building on the Zero line.
At $80, the display is relatively affordable for its size, and there are real upgrades under the hood.
Resolution rises to 1200 × 1920 in native portrait, the touch controller returns to 10 points after the 5-inch and 7-inch models were limited to 5, and the switch to an IPS panel tightens the worst-case touch response from 40 ms to 35 ms. The 85-degree viewing angle is worth qualifying, though: it beats the 5-inch panel’s 80 degrees but matches the 7-inch exactly, despite the announcement presenting it as a step up across the board. Those variants are listed at $40 and $60, respectively.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
The math might be a bit ugly for some, considering that a Compute Module with an I/O board isn’t how most people buy their Raspberry Pis, and that the pair generally costs more than a board with I/O onboard bought outright.
Advertisement
That matters more than usual right now. The cheapest compliant path is real enough: a 1GB Raspberry Pi 5 at $45 plus the $80 display comes to $125. But anyone wanting memory headroom is buying into a market that has moved sharply against them.
The 16GB Raspberry Pi 5 has climbed from $120 in November 2025 to $305 by April 2026 as Raspberry Pi passed on what it describes as a seven-fold rise in LPDDR4 pricing. The irony is pointed. The company has protected pricing on the Zero series and Pi 3 by drawing down existing LPDDR2 inventory, and those are precisely the boards this display locks out.
(Image credit: Raspberry Pi)
The one thing Raspberry Pi does gloss over is peak brightness, which drops to 400 nits from the 500 nits of its older 5- and 7-inch siblings, a difference that will show in the brightly lit rooms where kiosks and signage actually live.
Advertisement
While the panel offers a decent 225 ppi pixel density, slightly outdoing the 7-inch at 210, it does not hold a candle to the much sharper 5-inch display, which shares the 7-inch’s resolution across a smaller area for 294 ppi. That makes the 10-inch a middle-of-the-road offering at best in terms of sharpness.
On raw value, the largest panel is the strongest in the family. Its 135.4 × 216.6 mm active area works out to roughly 366 square millimeters of screen per dollar, against about 224 on the 7-inch and 171 on the 5-inch.
The most telling detail about the launch, however, may be the production commitment: Raspberry Pi guarantees availability until at least January 2030, a promise it extends to the smaller Touch Display 2 variants as well.
Coupled with an operating range of −20°C to +70°C and the Compute Module compatibility, that reads less like a hobbyist accessory than a panel intended for embedded integrators building point-of-sale terminals, industrial HMIs, and signage on a decade-long design cycle.
Advertisement
For makers, the 10-inch is a straightforward, if slightly dimmer, upgrade that costs backward compatibility and, at current board prices, rather more than the sticker suggests. For the industry customers Raspberry Pi has courted since listing publicly, it is something harder to buy than a screen: a component with a guaranteed support horizon, available only to those already standardized on the company’s newest boards.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login