From left: Expedia Group chairman Barry Diller, CEO Ariane Gorin, former CEO and current Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, and founder Rich Barton at Expedia’s Explore partner conference in Las Vegas this week. (Expedia Group Photo)
From her office overlooking the atrium at Expedia Group’s sunlit headquarters campus on the Seattle waterfront, CEO Ariane Gorin puts the online travel giant’s 30-year history into three chapters, each tied to a major inflection point in the evolution of technology.
Chapter 1 was the internet itself: the 1996 launch of Expedia inside Microsoft, when a small team bet that consumers could benefit from technology previously exclusive to travel agents.
Chapter 2 was mobile: as travelers migrated from desktop to smartphone, Expedia rebuilt itself for the small screen and assembled a collection of brands through a wave of acquisitions.
Chapter 3, Gorin says, is artificial intelligence, and it’s only starting to unfold. Expedia is now positioning itself for a new reality in which different types of agents — machines, not humans — will play a role in booking travel, in some cases making the decisions entirely on their own.
“It’s exciting to get to write the future of AI and travel,” Gorin said.
Advertisement
Expedia is marking its 30th year in business this week with the launch of the Expedia Trails Fund, a philanthropic initiative to restore outdoor trails across the U.S., backed by an initial $4.3 million in grants.
The company is also bringing top executives from throughout its history — founder Rich Barton, chairman Barry Diller, and former CEO Dara Khosrowshahi — together with Gorin for its partner conference in Las Vegas. Collectively, they grew Expedia from internal division to corporate spinout to online travel giant.
What happens next, under Gorin, will depend on Expedia’s ability to reinvent itself for a fundamentally new relationship between travelers and technology — attempting to continue a pattern that has repeated itself throughout the company’s history.
Chapter 1: ‘Power to the people’
Expedia started with a question: why shouldn’t everyone see what travel agents do?
Advertisement
In 1994, Rich Barton was a 27-year-old Microsoft employee, working on a CD-ROM travel guidebook — an Encarta for travel — when he learned about the airline reservation systems that travel agents used to book flights. The systems were accessible electronically, but only to industry insiders. He started to imagine regular people using them directly.
Rich Barton speaks at Seattle University’s Albers Executive Speaker Series in 2016. (GeekWire Photo / Kevin Lisota)
“The idea was simple and almost obvious once you said it out loud: give consumers the same information the professionals have, and get out of their way,” recalled Barton, now a well-known entrepreneur and investor, who shared new details of the Expedia story for this piece.
His term for this approach would ultimately define his career: “Power to the People.”
Barton pitched the idea directly to Microsoft CEO Bill Gates and President Steve Ballmer, who gave him the green light.
Secretly building for the web
The team initially started building the product for Microsoft’s proprietary online service, MSN 1.0, a would-be competitor to AOL, which had a proprietary multimedia development environment called Blackbird. Then the web gained steam, with its open protocols and universal reach.
Advertisement
That’s when Greg Slyngstad, the original general manager of what was then called Microsoft Travel, made a pivotal call: develop the product for the open web instead of Microsoft’s walled garden.
Slyngstad “knew the web would win,” Barton said. “Because of this, we secretly built for the web, which was brilliant. Expedia would not be what it is today if not for that decision.”
An early version of Expedia from the Internet Archive.
Before it was called Expedia, the project had a very different interface. In the early days of Microsoft Travel, the hot trend in software was the social user interface, personified most memorably by the widely mocked Microsoft Bob. Barton’s team had its own version: a parrot that served as a travel planning guide.
“I can’t remember the name of the parrot now,” he said, “but I faked a travel planning scenario talking to a robot parrot in front of the whole Consumer Division — which was a hit!”
‘We had massive ambition’
A plaque still on the Microsoft campus in Redmond marks what came next: “Microsoft Expedia, Version 1.0, Shipped October 22, 1996.”
Advertisement
A marker commemorating the Expedia launch in a courtyard at Microsoft. (GeekWire Photo / Todd Bishop)
Microsoft’s annual report for 1997 described Expedia as “a free travel service on the World Wide Web and MSN which enables users to find low fares, book flights, make hotel reservations, and rent cars.”
Barton and team had a much bigger vision. “We had massive ambition,” he said. Their BHAG — or “big, hairy, audacious goal,” the term popularized by author Jim Collins around the same time — was to become “the largest seller of travel in the world.”
Expedia’s revenue went from zero to $38.7 million by 1999. At the time, it was still about half the size of Travelocity, which had gotten to market first.
‘Go do this on your own!’
But Barton was already seeing a future for Expedia outside the software giant.
“One of my core arguments was that Expedia, in success, would become a travel company first and a tech company second,” he explained. “Therefore, we simply wouldn’t fit inside a giant tech company, and that by setting us free, it would dramatically improve our chances of fulfilling our giant global dreams.”
Advertisement
So Barton made the case to Ballmer, his boss at the time, to let him and his team of “internet adventurers” spin out through an initial public offering, with Microsoft retaining a stake.
He pasted a printout of Ballmer’s headshot onto an IATA card, the credential issued by the International Air Transport Association to licensed travel agents. “Steve, do you want to be a travel agent?” Barton remembers asking. “Do you want to run the largest travel agency in the world?”
Ballmer recoiled at the idea and yelled, “No, you guys should go do this on your own!” Then he asked if he could keep the card.
And with that, the spinout was set in motion.
Advertisement
The IPO prospectus in September 1999 described Expedia’s value proposition: “one-stop travel shopping and reservation services, providing reliable, real-time access to schedule, pricing and availability information.” Travel, it said, was uniquely suited to the internet: a global market with millions of buyers, and purchases “involving large amounts of information from multiple sources.”
‘Whoops and hollers’
Expedia went public on Nov. 10, 1999. The company had 138 employees. The stock, initially priced at $14 a share, soared more than 260% on its first day of trading.
“We’re feelin’ pretty good,” said Suzi Levine, who led Expedia’s IPO communications, in a Seattle Post-Intelligencer story about the Nasdaq debut, admitting “there may have been one or two whoops and hollers” around the office. Levine went on to become the U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland under President Obama, among other high-profile government positions.
Another newspaper clipping from that week shows Barton and his wife Sarah holding their newborn son William, born the same day as the IPO. The headline: “Initial public offspring.”
Advertisement
Rich and Sarah Barton with newborn son William in November 1999, the week of Expedia’s IPO. (AP / Daytona Beach News-Journal)
Within two years, Expedia had surpassed Travelocity to become the largest online travel company. Barton left in 2003, eventually going on to co-found ventures including Zillow and Glassdoor, applying the same “power to the people” philosophy — giving consumers access to data that industries had previously kept behind walls — to real estate and the job market.
Before Barton left, controlling interest in Expedia had passed to a new owner. But the deal that made it happen nearly didn’t survive the worst moment in the history of modern travel.
Chapter 2: ‘If there’s life, there’s travel’
Barry Diller was a Hollywood legend who had built Fox Broadcasting and launched the Home Shopping Network when he turned his attention to the internet in the late 1990s.
Through his company, USA Networks, he was assembling a portfolio of online brands, and he saw travel as the biggest opportunity. Travel, he wrote in his 2025 memoir, Who Knew, looked like “the perfect business to be colonized by the internet.” He had already acquired Hotels.com when he approached Microsoft about buying its controlling stake in Expedia.
Expedia Group’s then-Vice Chairman Peter Kern, Chairman Barry Diller, and future Expedia Group CEO Ariane Gorin, then president of Expedia Business Services, on stage at a company Town Hall meeting in December 2019. (Expedia Photo)
Expedia was still losing money, and Ballmer had concluded that Microsoft shouldn’t be in internet verticals anyway, as Diller recalled in the book. With relatively little negotiation, Microsoft agreed to a deal worth about $1 billion in USA Networks stock.
They were set to close the deal in October 2001. Then, on September 11, the travel industry shut down in an instant. The deal included a material adverse change clause — a legal escape hatch that would have let Diller walk away. For weeks, his team debated whether to use it.
Advertisement
How could they pay $1 billion for a travel company when no one was traveling?
“Some people said, you shouldn’t do it, it’s too dicey, there’s no travel, the world is ending,” Diller told GeekWire in 2016, on the company’s 20th anniversary.
But then, someone in the room said, “If there’s life, there’s travel.”
“Yeah, that’s what we’ll do,” Diller recalled saying. “We’ll bet on life.”
Advertisement
The next transition
The deal closed in February 2002. Diller folded Expedia into a division of his company called IAC Travel. When the head of that division resigned, a young executive named Dara Khosrowshahi raised his hand. Khosrowshahi had first crossed paths with Diller as a junior analyst at the investment bank Allen & Company, and had been in the room during the 9/11 deliberations.
In 2005, Diller spun IAC Travel back out as a standalone public company — Expedia, Inc. — with Khosrowshahi as CEO. He moved to what he later called “the Netherlands of Seattle.” He would hold the role for 12 years, longer than any leader in the company’s history.
It was under Khosrowshahi that Expedia navigated the shift from desktop to mobile. As travelers migrated to smartphones, the company rebuilt its products for the small screen.
Advertisement
Khosrowshahi also led an acquisition spree that transformed Expedia from a single brand into a travel conglomerate, adding Orbitz, Travelocity, Trivago, and others along the way.
Competition from all corners
Even as Expedia consolidated its position in online travel, a different kind of threat was emerging. Google was pushing into travel directly through Google Flights and Google Hotels, and its search algorithm had become the dominant gateway to travel shoppers — making the search giant Expedia’s biggest advertising channel and one of its largest competitors.
Google’s position is “a reality of e-commerce,” Khosrowshahi said in a 2016 interview with GeekWire, on the company’s 20th anniversary, in the conference room at its Bellevue, Wash., headquarters. “It’s reality of the Internet, and it’s certainly a reality of this category in general. That’s not going to stop.
Then-Expedia Group CEO Dara Khosrowshahi at the company’s Bellevue HQ in 2016. (GeekWire File Photo / Kevin Lisota)
The bigger direct threat, though, was emerging from across the Atlantic. The Priceline Group — later renamed Booking Holdings — had acquired Booking.com out of Amsterdam in 2005, building a business that would eventually surpass Expedia in gross bookings.
“Priceline is our toughest competitor,” Khosrowshahi said at the time, calling it a great company that had quickly expanded its international reach. “They’re more global than we are.”
Advertisement
And then there was a competitive threat that nobody at Expedia had anticipated: the rise of vacation rentals as a category, led by Airbnb. Expedia’s response was its biggest deal yet: the 2015 acquisition of HomeAway, which would later be rebranded as Vrbo — a $3.9 billion bet on the category.
“I think the growth of Airbnb has been pretty extraordinary, and I think anyone who would say today, ‘Oh, we expected it,’ would be lying,” Khosrowshahi said in the interview.
The one exception, he acknowledged, was Airbnb founder Brian Chesky, who was known for transforming the world of lodging just as Uber’s Travis Kalanick had upended transportation.
‘You’re f’ng crazy’
The next year, Uber came calling for Dara.
Advertisement
At the time, the ride-hailing company was in turmoil — embroiled in scandals, burning billions, and in need of a leader who could steady the ship. When Khosrowshahi told Diller he’d been offered the job as Uber’s CEO, the chairman’s first reaction was to hang up on him.
But Diller called back the next day. “Speaking as the chairman of Expedia, it will be a real mistake,” Khosrowshahi recalled him saying. “But speaking as a friend, I understand why you’re interested. How can I help?” Diller then helped him prepare his presentation for the Uber board.
In a farewell email to Expedia staff, obtained by GeekWire at the time, Khosrowshahi called Diller “the toughest, smartest, most demanding, and most human boss I’ve ever had.”
Advertisement
Ketchup and mustard
One of the company’s rising executives at the time was Ariane Gorin. A Berkeley, Calif., native who grew up in a French-American family, she had moved to France in 2001 and lived in Europe for more than two decades, eventually becoming a dual French-American citizen.
The future Expedia CEO had joined the company in 2013, and her first encounter with Expedia’s leadership set the tone: she met Khosrowshahi and CFO Mark Okerstrom on Halloween, when they were dressed as ketchup and mustard. “This is the best company,” she recalls thinking.
Expedia chairman Barry Diller, center, speaks with then Expedia CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, right, and CFO Mark Okerstrom at an event marking the company’s 20th anniversary in Bellevue in 2016. (GeekWire File Photo / Todd Bishop)
Okerstrom succeeded Khosrowshahi as CEO in August 2017. By comparison, his tenure was brief, most notable for Expedia’s move from downtown Bellevue to a picturesque former biotech campus on the Seattle waterfront, and an ambitious effort to unify its technology across its growing collection of brands.
After a strategy disagreement with the board over the pace and direction of the tech revamp, Okerstrom and CFO Alan Pickerill both resigned on the same day: Dec. 4, 2019. Diller, as chairman, asserted direct operational control alongside vice chairman Peter Kern, a longtime Expedia board member.
‘I’m on the edge of revolt’
Eight days later, on December 12, 2019, Diller put his frustration with Google in writing. In an email to Google’s chief business officer, Philipp Schindler — which later surfaced in the U.S. government’s antitrust case against Google — the chairman wrote that “much of Expedia’s trouble is due to an increasingly aggressive Google.”
Advertisement
Diller cited Vrbo’s payments to Google, which had risen from $21 million in 2015 to nearly $300 million in 2019, even as the traffic Google sent to VRBO stayed roughly flat.
“Google has systematically moved every lever in its hegemony over search to disembowel our businesses,” Diller wrote, describing himself as “on the edge of revolt.”
It wouldn’t be the last time Expedia found itself subject to forces beyond its control.
‘Buy the thing’
In the meantime, Diller had been shaping the company’s new home. In the mid-2010s, he had pushed Expedia to acquire a 40-acre site on Elliott Bay, formerly occupied by Immunex, maker of the arthritis drug Enbrel. The site was vacated after Amgen bought the Seattle biotech.
Advertisement
“Once I saw it, I just said, ‘buy the thing,’” Diller said at a 2023 company event. He wanted a campus that felt horizontal, not vertical, with what he called “a lot of ability to breathe.”
Expedia Group’s Seattle waterfront campus. Barry Diller personally shaped details of the design. (GeekWire Photo / Todd Bishop)
Over five years of planning, Diller personally shaped details down to the geometric paving stones that radiate outward from the main building like airport runways. The campus included 1,000 trees, an on-site soccer pitch, and a meeting pavilion called “the Prow,” designed to rise out of the landscape like the bow of a ship.
Beyond the property line, Expedia funded improvements to a portion of the Elliott Bay Trail running alongside the campus. That gave the company a sense for how it could invest in outdoor public spaces — an early version of the work it’s now expanding nationwide.
The first of Expedia’s began moving into the campus in October 2019. By February 2020, the move was complete, at a final cost of more than $1.1 billion.
‘Travel finds a way’
In April 2020, when Kern was formally named CEO, COVID-19 had brought the industry to a halt. He used the moment to complete the overhaul of Expedia’s technology platform, unifying the patchwork of systems that had accumulated through years of acquisitions.
Advertisement
“Travel finds a way,” Kern said in a virtual appearance at the 2020 GeekWire Summit, predicting that cities would come “roaring back,” and the industry would ultimately rebound.
Peter Kern, then Expedia Group’s CEO, speaking at the company’s 2023 partner conference. (GeekWire File Photo / Todd Bishop)
In the meantime, Gorin had been building what would become one of Expedia Group’s most important business lines. In 2014, Khosrowshahi had asked if she was interested in running the company’s affiliate network, which licensed the company’s travel technology and inventory to outside partners, letting them offer Expedia-powered bookings under their own brands.
It was less than 10% of the company’s business, and nobody else wanted the job.
“B2B was not seen as a sexy part of the company,” she recalled recently.
Gorin jumped in with passport in hand. She spent her initial months in the job talking to partners around the world, developing a strategy of going where Expedia’s own consumer brands couldn’t or didn’t go, including offline retail, corporate travel, emerging markets, and anywhere else there were untapped pools of travel demand.
Advertisement
Over the next decade, she grew the B2B division from a small afterthought into one of the company’s most important businesses. Today it accounts for roughly a third of Expedia’s overall business, powering travel programs for companies like Marriott, Hilton, United, Delta, and Capital One.
It was, in retrospect, perfect preparation for what would come next.
Chapter 3: ‘The agent that roams with you’
Long before ChatGPT became a household name, the head of OpenAI was already sitting on Expedia’s board. Sam Altman joined Expedia Group’s board of directors in 2019, recruited at a time when his AI research lab was still better known in Silicon Valley than in living rooms.
In November 2022, weeks before ChatGPT was unveiled to the world, Altman appeared on stage with Diller at a private executive event for IAC, the parent media company in Diller’s portfolio. Altman demonstrated what was coming by typing a prompt asking ChatGPT about Diller’s relationship with his wife, the fashion designer Diane von Furstenberg.
Advertisement
What the AI produced was “extremely creative” and “somewhat salacious,” Diller recalled at Expedia’s 2023 partner conference. “Because we do have a history.”
More than that, it was a glimpse of the future. Diller said the preview gave Expedia an early jump on generative AI. The company was one of the first travel firms to integrate ChatGPT — both as a plugin on OpenAI’s platform and as a travel-planning assistant in its own app.
It actually wasn’t a surprise to Diller. Speaking with GeekWire back in 2016, Mr. Diller (as we were advised to call him) had described AI as “another form of magic.” Asked whether it would influence travel, he said at the time: “Of course it will. It will influence everything.”
Altman left the board in June 2023, as OpenAI consumed his full attention.
Advertisement
From B2B to B2A
When Kern stepped down in May 2024, Ariane Gorin — the executive who had been steadily expanding the company’s business-to-business reach — became Expedia Group’s CEO.
She soon had a phrase for what the AI era would require: B2A, for business to agent. But there’s a risk in this new world: a human traveler might choose Expedia out of loyalty, or brand recognition, but an AI agent making the same decision might not care about any of that.
Expedia Group CEO Ariane Gorin at the company’s Explore partner conference last year. (Expedia Group Photo)
In a recent interview at Expedia headquarters, Gorin said the company now has teams looking at what it means to market to machines: how to make sure an AI agent understands that an Expedia Gold member gets a VIP perk at a particular hotel, or that a traveler has One Key points to apply toward a trip.
Expedia has been building AI into its own products for years now. But more recently, it has been looking outward: embedding its service inside ChatGPT, Claude, and Amazon’s Alexa+, buying ads inside AI chatbots, and signing a deal to power Uber’s hotel bookings. (Khosrowshahi, who remains on the Expedia Group board, recused himself from the negotiations over that partnership.)
“I think that’s the future,” Gorin said. “It’s the agent that really roams with you.”
Advertisement
A competitive moat
It’s still early. AI-native platforms like ChatGPT account for less than 1.5% of Expedia’s overall traffic, Gorin said. But the company said on its recent earnings call that getting its brands to show up in AI responses has become its fastest-growing marketing channel.
As demonstrated by Diller’s past frustrations with Google, these external dependencies can be a double-edged sword. But there are early signs that Expedia won’t be cut out of the picture. In March, OpenAI scaled back plans to let users book travel directly inside ChatGPT.
Gorin said she wasn’t surprised, given the complexities of travel. “Trust me, it’s pretty complicated to be able to go from shopping to booking to servicing,” she said. Expedia handles 250 million customer service interactions a year, across more than 30 languages.
“I see them as partners,” more than competitive threats, she said of the major AI platforms. “I see them as an opportunity for us to attract new travelers into our ecosystem.”
Advertisement
Illustrating the ongoing importance of industry partnerships, Expedia struck a deal this spring to power hotel bookings inside the Uber app, with Vrbo vacation rentals coming later this year. Khosrowshahi, who still sits on Expedia’s board, recused himself from the deal.
Growth and challenges
The company that began in 1996 as a small team inside Microsoft is now on a different scale entirely. When Expedia went public in November 1999, it had fewer than 150 employees, about $700 million in gross bookings, and a presence in four countries.
Fast forward nearly 30 years, to the end of 2025, and Expedia had roughly 16,000 employees across nearly 50 countries, $119.6 billion in gross bookings, and a marketplace of 3.6 million lodging properties, including 2.4 million vacation rentals.
The company’s evolution has also brought challenges, including executive turnover and job cuts — with the latest round impacting 162 tech positions at the company’s headquarters earlier this year.
Advertisement
‘More travel equals more memories’
Gorin, meanwhile, has been putting her own stamp on the company.
To mark its 30th year, Expedia is launching the Expedia Trails Fund, a philanthropic initiative to restore outdoor trails and protect natural landscapes across the United States.
The initial $4.3 million will go to 11 projects, spanning destinations from Yellowstone’s Paradise Valley to Hawaii’s Kealakekua Bay, covering areas that draw more than 1 million visits annually. Expedia is partnering with The Conservation Fund, The Nature Conservancy, and Trust for Public Land, and with AllTrails to match support for the hiking app’s stewards fund.
The effort reflects growing demand among travelers for outdoor experiences, particularly among younger generations. Gorin said the company’s earlier trail work alongside its Seattle campus helped to show what could be possible at a larger scale.
Advertisement
“If our trails fund really works the way we want it to, the impact we’re going to have on trails across the U.S. and elsewhere is going to be huge,” she said.
For Gorin, the initiative connects to something deeper. A few years after she joined Expedia, her sister was diagnosed with stage four lung cancer. Before she died, she offered Gorin a piece of advice: travel more, because more travel equals more memories.
“And then she said, ‘Oh, wait a minute. You work in travel. One day, you should use that story on stage,’” Gorin recalled. She told it at her first town hall as CEO.
“We are in the business of helping people make memories,” Gorin said. The common thread among all of Expedia’s CEOs over the years, she said, is a belief in the benefits of travel for people and the world, and in the potential of technology to achieve it.
Advertisement
‘Original vision … fully realized’
But if Expedia’s founding vision was to remove the barriers to travel, isn’t there a risk of people losing control when AI puts a new intermediary into the process? Barton, the person who started it all, doesn’t buy that. He draws a direct line from the original idea to the present moment.
“Round one was radical transparency,” he said. “We blew the doors open and gave everyone access to information that used to live only in a computer on the desk of a professional.”
AI agents, Barton asserts, are “the next unlock.” Rather than replacing the human in the loop, he said, they give every traveler “the equivalent of a brilliant, tireless expert in their corner.” That makes AI an accelerant for the concept of “Power to the People,” not a replacement.
“I don’t see it as a threat. I see it as the original vision, finally fully realized,” he said. “We started by turning the screen around. Now we’re handing people the whole toolkit.”
‘We’ve seen an increase in Blu-ray orders of 10,000%’: I spoke to a Blu-ray and vinyl manufacturer about their Blu-ray sales and it’s given me even more hope for physical media’s survival
Physical home media has gone through a turbulent time the last few years. With the rise of streaming services, demand for physical media over the past few years has steadily declined, with people choosing the convenience of streaming over physical discs.
There’s still a dedicated fanbase of physical media collectors, though, and more recently streaming price rises and splintering means people have more interest just owning the stuff they want to watch. I’ve been writing about my hope for the resurgence of 4K Blu-ray, and physical media in general, since 2023. Now in 2026, I’m actually more hopeful than ever. It couldn’t come at a better time either, with the 20th anniversary of Blu-ray’s debut on June 20th, 2026.
I recently spoke to Kath Summersgill, Joint Group Head of Sales at Key Production Group, a manufacturer specializing primarily in music manufacturing with vinyl, cassette and CD. However, the group also works with Blu-ray, both video and audio varieties, and DVD. We discussed the state of Blu-ray production, and physical media in general, and she had some encouraging things to say.
Advertisement
Latest Videos From
Promising numbers
(Image credit: Future)
“We’ve seen an increase in Blu-ray sales of over 10,000%, particularly in Blu-ray Audio” Kath tells me. “That’s over the span of the past eight to 10 years.” For a format that’s been on the decline, that’s an incredibly encouraging number.
Kath then mentions the ERA (Entertainment Retailer’s Association) report from December 2025, which reveals sales revenue for Music, Video and Gaming sales. “Although there was an overall decrease in the physical video format, Blu-ray actually increased by 3%”. While that may not sound like a lot, it’s a positive after some particularly bad numbers.
If you read more into the 2025 ERA report, 4K Blu-ray sales increased 19.5%, which is an extremely encouraging number. The strongest selling disc of the year was Wicked, a disc I regularly use for testing AV equipment and one of the main highlights of our Blu-ray Bounty feature (more on that later).
Advertisement
So, why have 4K Blu-ray sales turned around? For that answer, we’ll have to look to streaming services.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
You can’t rely on streaming
One major issue with streaming is you don’t own the movie (Image credit: Shutterstock)
One of the most frustrating things people have with streaming services is the availability of movies. At one time or another, most people will have experienced a movie leaving a streaming service, only for it to either go to a rival service (that typically you won’t subscribe to) or for it just to disappear.
Advertisement
I’ve even seen horror stories of people buying movies on a streaming service that then also disappear. A Reddit thread in the r/AmazonPrime subreddit is a great example of this, where user u/Electrical_Paper6286 has had it happen “4 times between 2 movies”. Although the movies eventually returned, it’s a sign of how tentative the ‘ownership’ of movies on streaming platforms can be.
It’s one of the key issues affecting people’s trust in streaming services and something that’s driving people to physical media. Kath relates it to vinyl. “We know that vinyl is never ever going to replace streaming, but it exists very happily alongside it. I think that Blu-ray is the same, it offers different things that streaming doesn’t. It’s very much something that you can have and hold and you can keep and you can play over and over again.”
Kath also points out another issue with online-based movie and music streaming. “[With physical] you’re not at the whim of your internet connection speed, or whether or not certain libraries drop certain titles, licence changes”.
Advertisement
This is another frustration. Numerous times I’ve gone to watch a movie on streaming and due to connection issues , it’s either streamed in reduced quality, buffered or just not streamed at all. This isn’t a problem with physical media.
A passionate fanbase
Steelbooks are just one way passionate 4K Blu-ray fans indulge in the hobby (Image credit: Future)
As I mentioned above, I’m a budding collector of 4K Blu-ray. While I don’t have fully stacked shelves (yet), I do have a collector’s edition or two and more than a few steelbooks.
In FilmStories’ article about the ERA 2025 report, they mention that steelbooks and special editions helped the growth in 4K Blu-ray in the UK, with every one in 10 4K Blu-rays released having some sort of steelbook or special edition, and due to their higher prices, they made up £2 of every £10 spent on 4K Blu-ray in 2025.
Advertisement
I tell Kath I’m a sucker for nice packaging and she agrees and she relates it to a recent vinyl release that Key Production Group handled. “We find people are doing this. We did a vinyl release recently with 72 variants and even though the packaging was the same, the color of the vinyl was different.”
(I’m also a sucker for colored vinyl, with a rust-effect Jack White/Dead Weather release from a Third Man Records Vault collection being a particular highlight in my stack.)
While special editions are great, it’s also the work of independent distributors and manufacturers, delivering more excellent 4K restorations than ever, that gets more people to invest in 4K Blu-ray.
The Criterion Collection and Arrow Video are two of the big names, but other organizations such as Kino Lorber, Shout Factory, Boutique Home Video and the BFI are crucial. These companies are producing more sought-after titles and giving them excellent restorations that mean people want to own them in the best possible quality.
Advertisement
My ‘Blu-ray Bounty’ column has shown me all kinds of films that are are excellent for showing off your home theater, such as the new Lawrence of Arabia restoration (Image credit: Sony Pictures / Future)
In November 2024, I started the Blu-ray Bounty. This is an ongoing monthly column where I test the latest 4K Blu-rays from each month — and since its debut, the column has been growing.
We’re covering more discs than ever, covering a wider range of genres, and I have a feeling it’s only going to get bigger. I’ve produced tons of lists of excellent 4K titles that are perfect for showing off home theater systems, such as this 6 action movies list and 6 classic movies that show what 4K can do. and a good chunk of my reference discs for AV testing came from the Blu-ray Bounty.
I’m also an active user of the r/4kbluray subreddit and this is again one of the most passionate subreddits I’ve come across. Users update each other on releases, give their thoughts and reviews on the latest titles and always showing off their collections in the best possible way.
While it may well have been doom-and-gloom for 4K and Blu-ray in the last couple of years, I for one am hopeful for its future. What better way to celebrate Blu-ray’s 20th anniversary than with some good news.
Advertisement
The best 4K Blu-ray players for all budgets
Thinking of buying a new TV?
Try our TV size and model finder! You tell it how far you sit from your TV, we’ll tell you what size to buy based on viewing angle advice from image quality experts, and we’ll recommend our three top TVs at that size for different prices.
In a voice vote last week, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 6028, the “Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act.” The legislation is presented as a technical reorganization of some government agencies, but it’s much more than that.
H.R. 6028 would fundamentally change the U.S. Copyright Office, and not in a good way. The bill removes the Library of Congress’ current supervisory role over the Copyright Office, transfers several powers directly to the Register of Copyrights, and makes the Register a presidential appointee, confirmed by the Senate.
These changes would make an office that’s already hugely influential in copyright and tech policy much more political. EFF first explained why that’s a terrible idea when it came up nearly a decade ago. This bill, like the older one, weakens the few public-interest checks and balances that do exist. We hope the Senate promptly rejects this bill.
The Copyright Office Doesn’t Need More Politics—Or More Power
The Copyright Office’s main responsibilities are administrative and advisory. It registers copyrights, maintains records, grows the Library of Congress’s collections, and provides expertise to Congress on copyright law. But over the past two decades, the Office has also become increasingly influential in copyright policy debates that affect free expression, libraries, educators, competition—and everyday internet users. Unfortunately, it has not been a neutral advocate. The office’s recent report on the role of AI severely bungled the issue of fair use, prioritizing private licensing market “solutions” over user rights.
Advertisement
Going further back, the Copyright Office supported one of the most infamous anti-internet proposals of all time—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), a disastrous internet censorship proposal that sparked one of the largest online protests in history. The Office has repeatedly advanced positions that favored large entertainment-industry interests over the public interest.
The Office also plays a major role in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Section 1201 rulemaking process, which determines when the public may lawfully bypass digital locks for activities such as security research, repair, preservation, or accessibility. EFF has used this process repeatedly to mitigate some of the worst harms of the DMCA. H.R. 6028 would move rulemaking authority over 1201 from the Librarian of Congress to the Register of Copyrights, further consolidating power within the Copyright Office itself.
The bill also makes the Register of Copyrights a presidential appointee confirmed by the Senate. Each administration will be pressured to pick nominees aligned with their own policy preferences, and the powerful copyright owning industries will invest even more heavily in lobbying to get their way, and influence the selection. This position should be focused on administrative ability and actual expertise, not lobbying and politics.
The Copyright Office Should Stay Connected To The Library of Congress
H.R. 6028 would do more than change who appoints the Register of Copyrights. It would sever the Copyright Office from Library of Congress supervision and transfer many Librarian powers directly to the Register.
Advertisement
The supervisory relationship exists for good reason, as the nation’s libraries have pointed out for years. The Library, while far from perfect, at least has the mission of preserving and providing access to knowledge. That should be an important public-interest counterweight in copyright debates. Congress has not explained how weakening the ties between the Library and the Copyright Office would serve the public better, or even seriously inquired about it.
This Bill Was Rushed Through
Back in March, EFF joined Public Knowledge, the Center for Democracy and Technology, library organizations and tech groups, urging Congress not to fast-track this legislation. We told them changes to the Copyright Office will have major consequences for the “speech rights, educational opportunities, and creative freedoms of all Americans.”
Yet Congress moved forward without any hearings on the bill, and without meaningful examination. H.R. 6028 creates a years-long separation of the Copyright Office from the Library of Congress, transfers significant legal authority, and restructures the appointment process for the nation’s top copyright official. Changes like that deserve hearings, debate, and public scrutiny. H.R. 6028 got none of that.
The Senate Should Stop This Bill
Copyright law exists to serve the public and “promote the progress” of science and learning. The institutions that administer copyright law should do the same.
Advertisement
H.R. 6028 would move the Copyright Office further away from that goal. Congress should be strengthening public-interest oversight of copyright policymaking, not looking for ways to concentrate more authority in a single presidentially appointed official.
The Senate should reject H.R. 6028. The Copyright Office should serve the public—not presidential administrations, and not industry lobbyists.
WTF?! According to Kaspersky, cybercriminals have been targeting Steam users with a sustained malware campaign since 2025, distributing malicious software disguised as desktop wallpapers. The attack hijacked the accounts of gamers using Steam’s live wallpaper application Wallpaper Engine, which ranks among the platform’s most popular non-game downloads.
The attack reportedly abused Wallpaper Engine’s “Application Wallpaper” executable, which runs as a standalone Windows program and can include community-developed games, planners, calendars, system monitors, and other widgets. However, because the app allows unverified third-party code to run on users’ systems, it can be abused by threat actors to target unsuspecting users.
The researchers found that the attackers used two primary methods to distribute malware. The first involved archives containing the executable wallpaper alongside a malicious payload, typically including compromised .exe files, DLLs, or scripts. The malware was also frequently concealed within password-protected archives and executed automatically when the wallpaper was applied.
Once applied, the infected executables stole users’ account credentials, hijacked live sessions, and transmitted the stolen data to servers controlled by the attackers. The researchers discovered dozens of malicious application wallpapers on Steam Workshop, some of which were downloaded tens of thousands of times.
Advertisement
To test the attackers’ modus operandi, the researchers launched a wallpaper containing a malicious game called NTRaholic, which ran “flawlessly.” The gameplay and controls worked as advertised, raising no suspicion at first glance. However, unbeknownst to the user, the wallpaper dropped a backdoor called Synaptics.exe, part of the notorious DarkKomet malware family.
The executable that launched the game was named ._cache_GAME1.exe, but it also installed a system library called AggregatorHost.dll, which contained a malicious payload designed to steal user data and transmit it to the attackers’ command-and-control server. Once the attackers gained control of the active session, they used the compromised account to upload additional malicious wallpapers to Steam Workshop.
The campaign primarily targeted gamers in China, who accounted for 89% of the compromised downloads. Users in Germany, Canada, Russia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Vietnam, and India were also affected, though in much smaller numbers. Steam has since removed all of the malicious wallpapers, but Kaspersky is still urging users to run antivirus scans before applying wallpapers that include built-in executables.
Benz’s electric “Grand Limousine” might just make minivans cool.
The concept of a living room on wheels is something of a modern cliché in the automotive world, a vision for a car so comfortable, well-appointed and ultimately luxurious that you’d be just as happy to spend hours there as you would lounging at home.
The problem is that most of those concepts, like the Cadillac InnerSpace or Mini Urbanaut, have depended on the availability of self-driving technology, something that still only exists in the limited circles of Waymo, Zoox and their ilk. We’re still years away from you or I being able to buy a car that can drive itself unsupervised, but that isn’t stopping Mercedes from releasing what could be the most compelling of the rolling living spaces.
Advertisement
It’s called the VLE, and while it requires a human behind the wheel, passengers in the second row will be treated to reclining, massaging seats, a 22-speaker Dolby Atmos sound system and a 31.3-inch ultrawide 8K display. It’s an amazing package, but is it enough to shrug off those minivan preconceptions?
Don’t call it a Caravan
Visually, the VLE fits the silhouette of countless family-friendly minivans that have been handling kid-hauling duties in the United States since the Dodge Caravan planted the seed way back in the early ’80s. Ask Mercedes, though, and they’ll tell you this is a different beast.
Advertisement
The VLE is what the company calls a Grand Limousine, and while that sounds pretentious, it’s actually perfectly appropriate. At 216 inches, the VLE is 10 inches longer than a GLS SUV. It also has an internal ceiling height of 49 inches, making it easy for me, at six feet tall, to move around.
And it is certainly at least as luxurious as your average limousine, with seating to match. The VLE can be configured with room for up to eight across three rows, but it’s best with fewer, specifically configured with the two-seat captain’s chair arrangement you see here.
Two powertrains will be available. The VLE 300 offers front-wheel drive and 272 horsepower, while the VLE 400 4MATIC steps up to a dual-motor, all-wheel drive configuration with 416 hp. Both rely on the same, sizable, 115-kilowatt-hour usable battery pack that spans the floor of the van. Mercedes says it will provide enough range to cover 435 miles on the European WLTP test cycle. On our more challenging EPA test, expect a rating somewhere around 350 miles.It’s an 800-volt system that charges at a maximum rate of 300 kilowatts. That means adding about 200 miles in 15 minutes.
Advertisement
The media experience
As much as I love to drive, the best seats in the VLE are in the second row. From there, you can recline and gaze up through the glass ceiling, or deploy the 31.3-inch ultra-wide screen and whittle away at your YouTube queue.
You can also stream Disney+ directly on the display, but sadly those are the only two video streaming partners of note. Neither Chromecast nor AirPlay streaming are supported. There is an HDMI port if you want to BYO content, but running wires across the cabin doesn’t feel particularly luxurious to me.
You can also pick from a few basic games to play on the system, and if you have two kids who can never agree on anything, you can split the TV into dual, 15-inch 4K displays. The 32:9 ratio means that after splitting, you’re effectively getting a pair of 16:9 displays, which is honestly better for viewing most content anyway. A pair of Bluetooth headsets means a pair of passengers can also get their own dedicated audio.
Advertisement
Sitting up front? There’s plenty of pixels there, too. Specifically, three dashboard-spanning units that make up Benz’s MBUX Superscreen setup. There’s a 10.25-inch gauge cluster on the left, a 14-inch main infotainment screen in the middle and a 14-inch passenger display on the right that can also stream videos and other media.
For the broader aural part of the media experience, you have 22 speakers from a Burmester 3D sound system. It handles Dolby Atmos, so you can be fully immersed in both music and more theatrical content. Interestingly, the system can also dynamically reconfigure itself based on who is sitting in the van and where.
Driving solo? The speakers automatically prioritize you. Have a full van? It’ll fill it all with sound. And it’s very capable of doing that. I cruised through a playlist of Atmos-optimized music, everything from Tay Tay to Axl Rose, and everything sounded fantastic.
Advertisement
Creature comforts
Those two chairs in the middle are heated and ventilated and can sit you upright or slide you to a reasonable degree of recline. No, they don’t go fully flat, but you probably wouldn’t like what would happen to you in an accident if they did. They’re honestly a bit narrow and awkward to get in and out of, but I could see myself spending hours back here without complaint.
I could stay productive, too, thanks to integrated USB-C power in all three rows, and a fold-out laptop tray that looks flimsy but was sturdy enough to handle my Lenovo X1 Carbon. A temperature-controlled compartment in the armrest can keep hot drinks hot and cold drinks cool, and there’s a separate chiller towards the back for more.
RGB LEDs run throughout the entire cabin, so you can give your ride whatever hue you like, and there’s even an integrated nebulizer, making for a bespoke scent, too.
Advertisement
Even the third row is comfortable. The middle seats swing themselves forward and out of the way, so entry is easy, and I had ample headroom back there.And then there’s the driver’s seat, which is also comfortable and accommodating should you have to drive this machine yourself.
Behind the wheel
With up to 416 horsepower delivered through all four wheels, the VLE can be properly quick when punched up to sport mode. It also rides on adaptive air suspension, which can firm up and make the VLE feel that much more responsive in the corners.
Advertisement
But in my time behind the wheel, it never felt comfortable when driven aggressively. I enjoyed piloting the VLE much more when I dialed it down to Comfort, took a deep breath and just cruised along my route.
In this mode, the air suspension is supple, and the throttle relaxed enough that you can ease your way forward without disturbing anyone in the rear seats. The steering has a slow ratio as well, but don’t let that make you think this isn’t a nimble van. With seven degrees of steering from the rear wheels, the VLE can turn its impressive bulk in a far tighter circle than you might expect.
Drivers get to take advantage of a suite of active safety systems as well, including active lane-keep assistance on the highway and a comprehensive automatic parking system that swings this big beast into tiny parking spots. It’ll even automatically back itself out of a tight situation should you make a wrong turn down a narrow alley.
Advertisement
Wrap-up
About the only thing the VLE is missing is full autonomy. It’d be awfully nice to get a machine like this and let it take you to work while you got in a few rounds of Fortnite on that 8K display. Alas, we’re not there yet, but I have a feeling most people who experience the VLE will do so from the second row. This would be an epic airport and event shuttle, but it’s going to be a little while before it enters service.
The VLE isn’t due to hit the American market until late 2027, and while the price isn’t set, Andreas Zygan, Head of Development at Mercedes-Benz Vans, told me this: “It will not be a cheap one, for sure.”
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: In May, the federal government announced without warning that it would take apart a network of ocean monitoring systems that it had spent over $350 million to build. No reason was given for the decision to shut down the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI), but suspicion immediately focused on the network’s role in tracking climate change. But the OOI also provides data that’s useful for weather forecasting and fisheries management, leading to widespread opposition. Today, it appears that the opposition has won, as the government will announce that it’s reversing the decision. The big remaining question is how much damage the OOI took during the intervening month.
[…] The OOI is a federally supported resource that provides ocean data for use by academic researchers, government planners, and private companies. It consists of arrays of monitoring systems in several locations in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans that can track things like currents, salinity, chemical levels, temperatures, and tectonic activity. (There are over 100 individual entries on the page that display the data gathered by the system.) Obviously, there are many potential uses of that data. The fact that it has been gathered continuously for a decade means it can help track changes in how carbon dioxide and heat enter the oceans. This is probably what made it a target for the climate change denialists who helped set the Trump administration’s policy.
Those policymakers are perfectly happy to annoy people with environmental concerns, but they apparently neglected to consider how upset everyone else would be about losing access to the other data. The ensuing public backlash led the Senate on Wednesday to unanimously agree with a measure that would block the government from taking down the OOI. Today’s decision may indicate that the administration recognized it had gotten itself into a fight it knew it was losing. The National Science Foundation formally announced the decision, stating: “effective immediately, [it] will not proceed with further removal or descoping of equipment from the remaining arrays and will continue operations including planned maintenance.” The agency added that it “appreciates the concerns raised by the range of stakeholders that have informed us they rely on data” from the OOI.
The NSF also said it would “issue a Dear Colleague Letter to collect input from stakeholders and convene an expert panel to assess observational needs, evaluate available data sources, consider responses … and help the agency identify a sustainable path for NSF’s ocean observing systems.”
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Kensington SD5010T5 EQ: 30-second review
The Kensington SD5010T5 EQ is a 13-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 docking station announced in May 2026. It sits at the entry end of Kensington’s growing TB5 line-up and is designed to bring next-generation connectivity to a broader audience without the price tag of the flagship EQ Pro.
The key design choice here is straightforward. Kensington trades two of the three downstream Thunderbolt 5 ports found on the SD5000T5 for a pair of built-in HDMI 2.1 outputs. That is a significant swap.
Advertisement
Windows users gain the convenience of plugging monitors in directly, but Mac users with Apple-only displays lose access to the full TB5 daisy-chain capability offered by some of the alternatives.
What remains is still competitive, but it’s a Windows-centric choice.
Another PC-friendly inclusion is that the dock delivers 140W power delivery with KonstantCharge, meaning peripherals continue charging even when the laptop is absent. There are two USB-C Gen 2 ports that the SD5000T5 lacked, three USB-A ports across two speed grades, SD 4.0 and microSD 4.0 card readers, 2.5Gbps Ethernet, and a 3.5mm combo audio jack.
Advertisement
That spec pitches to Windows-based creatives who want to connect their laptop to multiple monitors and peripherals while recharging.
The issue with Kensington-branded equipment is always the asking price, and the SD5010T5 EQ is at the premium price end of the small TB5 dock offerings. That said, it’s a highly capable device, and on the cusp of being the best laptop docks for Thunderbolt 5 right now.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Advertisement
Kensington SD5010T5 EQ: Price & availability
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
How much does it cost? $300/£330
When is it out? Available now in the USA
Where can you get it? Direct from Kensington or via an online retailer
The Kensington SD5010T5 EQ Thunderbolt 5 Triple 4K Docking Station is currently available through Kensington’s official site and selected retail partners.
Launched at an MSRP of $349.99 / £329.99, it falls squarely within the premium pricing tier commanded by next-generation multi-display docks. The actual retail price is $299.99 on Amazon.com in the US, but it has yet to appear on European Amazon locations.
On the UK Kensington website, you are directed to ask for ‘business pricing’, hinting that Kensington want to keep this product decidedly B2B in some regions.
This investment positions it alongside competitor offerings like the Cable Matters Thunderbolt 5 Dock, yet it undercuts hyper-premium alternatives by choosing a tightly curated 13-in-1 layout over expansive, multi-device enterprise chassis. For business fleets, it’s a standard three-year limited warranty and unified hardware SKU offer tangible IT cost-reduction benefits during long-term workspace standardisation rollouts.
However, the recent Ugreen Maxidok 10-in-1 offers very similar specifications, equivalent build quality, and better availability than the SD5010T5, but it sells for $50 less.
Advertisement
Also cheaper is the StarTech Thunderbolt 5 Dock, which sells for around $283 on Amazon, and bears an uncanny resemblance to the Kensington product. The same spec, ports, and layout hint that one or both of these products are rebrands or derivatives.
Therefore, with this pricing, Kensington is hoping that its customer base is more trusting of its brand than Ugreen, or that the deals its B2B channel pathway can offer counter those comparisons.
What I should say is that, compared to a few Kensington docks I might mention, the SD5010T5 seems to be on the right side of affordable. But that doesn’t make it a bargain.
1x TB5 host port (80Gbps / 120Gbps Bandwidth Boost)
Thunderbolt 5 (downstream)
1x TB5 ports
Advertisement
USB-A ports
3x USB-A 3.2 Gen2 (1x 10Gbps, 2x 5Gbps)
USB-C ports
2 x USB-C Gen2 10Gbps (1 x 30W, 1 x 7.5W)
Advertisement
Video
2x HDMI 2.1 (+ 1xTB5 ports with adapters)
Display Output (Windows / TB5)
Triple 4K @ 144Hz, or Dual 8K @ 60Hz
Advertisement
Display Output (macOS M4/M5 base, M-Pro/Max)
Dual 4K @ 60Hz via HDMI, or 4K + 6K via HDMI + TB5
Power Delivery
Up to 140W on upstream
Advertisement
Power Use
4.5W each on USB-A ports, 30W on 1x USB-C, 7.5W on 1x USB-C, 15W on TB5 downstream
Storage Slot
N/A
Advertisement
Card Readers
SD 4.0 + microSD 4.0
Network
1x 2.5GbE Ethernet
Advertisement
Audio
1 x 3.5mm Combo Microphone & Headphone Port (front)
Security
Kensington lock slot (cable lock sold separately, (K65020EU or K65021WW))
Advertisement
Thermal
Passive cooling
Construction
Aluminium
Advertisement
Weight
780g
Size
140 x 140 x 40mm
Advertisement
Warranty
3 years
Kensington SD5010T5 EQ: Design
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Mac mini-sized
Plenty of ports
Only one TB5 downstream port
In terms of physical construction, Kensington has delivered an exceptionally solid, industrial-grade brick. The shell is sculpted from 100% post-consumer recycled (PCR) aluminium, featuring a striking milled exterior with structural ridging across its top surface that serves dual purposes: heat dissipation and minimalist styling.
Capped with sleek black impact-resistant composite faces on the front and rear, this unit sits anchored heavily on the desktop. It is a substantial, reassuringly weighted device designed to remain planted even when thick, stiff high-bandwidth cables are plugged into its rear ports.
Advertisement
While this is a guess on my part, I think the target audience here was undoubtedly Apple Mac Mini owners. The size is about 13mm larger, front and side, than the current Mac Mini, and therefore it would easily fit on top of the SD5010T5. I could test that assertion if I owned one, but I never have.
On this dock, the Port layout follows a logical workflow separation, though they show distinct philosophy differences from lower-tier hubs. The front face hosts immediate-access operational IO: an informative status LED, one high-speed 10Gbps USB-A port providing 7.5W of charging, a 3.5mm audio combo jack, and twin high-performance SD and MicroSD 4.0 card readers.
Wisely, the primary high-power upstream Thunderbolt 5 connection is routed safely away to the rear panel alongside the downstream expansion tree.
This layout successfully pushes trailing host cables out of sight, maximising usable desk space. The rear array includes two native HDMI 2.1 ports, a 2.5GbE LAN interface, two standard legacy USB-A ports, and two Thunderbolt 5 receptacles, one each for uplink and downlink.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Unlike competing consumer-grade products, the dock includes integrated dual security-lock slots for Kensington cables, along with an optional zero-footprint vertical-mounting bracket array tailored specifically for dense corporate desks.
The issue the port selection immediately raises is how committed is this dock to TB5. Since you can only connect a single downstream device, that doesn’t naturally translate into more direct ways to exploit its maximum performance potential.
Unsurprisingly, the Kensington Security Slot is present, as it is across the EQ range. A zero-footprint mounting bracket is also available as an optional accessory (K34050WW), allowing the dock to be hidden beneath a desk. That is a thoughtful addition for hot-desking environments where visibility and access are priorities.
Build quality across the Kensington EQ family has been consistently praised. The three-year limited warranty reflects confidence in that construction.
Advertisement
Kensington SD5010T5 EQ: Features
TB5 Bandwidth
Triple monitors
140W charging
The core proposition of the SD5010T5 EQ centres entirely on the transformative potential of Intel’s Thunderbolt 5 standard. By doubling the bi-directional throughput of Thunderbolt 4 to a baseline of 80Gbps, it eliminates the strict interface constraints of yesteryear. Or, that’s the theory.
For complex multi-monitor tasks, its asymmetric Bandwidth Boost mechanism dynamically flexes to deliver up to 120Gbps of pure display pipeline throughput. This immense pipeline allows a Windows 11 host to comfortably drive a spectacular three 4K monitors at 144Hz or dual 8K displays at 60Hz simultaneously over native HDMI and downstream ports without sub-sampling artefacts or compression stutter.
For macOS workflows, the docking station provides comprehensive native support, although it is constrained by Apple’s architectural variations across its silicon tiers. Base M4/M5 MacBooks can confidently extend to dual 4K monitors at 60Hz via the direct dual HDMI outputs, while advanced configurations equipped with M5 Pro or M5 Max silicon can completely maximise productivity by driving a full triple-display array.
That said, for numerous reasons, I suspect that Apple fans are more likely to gravitate toward a dock with TB5 daisy-chaining as a priority than toward this layout, which has only one downlink port.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Beyond data and video, power delivery is a standout highlight. Operating under the advanced USB-C Power Delivery 3.1 architecture, the dock outputs a massive 140W over its single upstream link. That’s plenty of power to rapidly fast-charge a high-end 16-inch workstation laptop under maximum computational loads, assuming nothing else is sucking power from the dock.
I’ll talk more about this later, but a 140W output uses most of the PSU’s capacity, leading to potential deficits elsewhere.
Kensington has integrated its clever KonstantCharge engineering, which guarantees that downstream accessories and smartphones connected to the designated charging ports continue to receive stable power even when the host laptop is entirely uncoupled from the desk. Which is useful.
Power management on this dock is one of its strengths, but conversely, if you do use three monitors, you won’t have any downstream Thunderbolt ports to connect a TB5 external SSD or an adapter to run 10GbE Ethernet.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Kensington SD5010T5 EQ: Performance
80Gbps upstream bandwidth
TB5 Bandwidth Boost for video
Power seems an issue
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
In synthetic testing and real-world deployment, the SD5010T5 EQ runs at the absolute peak of peripheral capabilities, provided you are feeding it from a native Thunderbolt 5 silicon host. Interfacing with next-generation external storage configurations reveals blistering cross-device speeds, easily saturating high-end NVMe drive enclosures well beyond old Thunderbolt 4 thresholds.
The built-in SD and MicroSD 4.0 readers operate natively on the UHS-II bus, consistently sustaining benchmarked file transfer rates up to 312MBps. This easily outpaces the built-in card readers integrated into premium notebooks, making it a highly valued asset for digital content creators, photographers, and video editors handling raw 8K video timelines.
Networking performance is similarly robust. Upgrading from standard 1GbE to an integrated 2.5Gbps RJ45 Ethernet port allows the dock to mesh perfectly with modern high-speed corporate network infrastructures, accelerating large local network backups and NAS file transfers.
Advertisement
However, early testing uncovers a clear hardware limitation regarding the dock’s 180W external power supply unit. While 140W is reliably allocated to feed the host laptop over the upstream cable, that leaves a slim 40W headroom to run the internal hub logic, the high-power 2.5GbE controller, and all remaining downstream ports.
When a user populates the 30W fast-charging USB-C port while simultaneously running a 15W downstream Thunderbolt accessory and drawing power from the front legacy USB-A line, the power envelope hits an absolute wall, which might lead to minor wattage throttling on the uplink or brief accessory disconnection cycles under full load.
It’s hard to say how much extra power the PSU needed to negate this possible pitfall, but some smaller docks, like the Ugreen Maxidok 10-in-1, have roughly 60W to work with above the laptop charging requirements. And, I did also notice that the Maxidok 17-to-1 promises 140W laptop charging, but has a 240W PSU.
But conversely, the Plugable TBT-UDT3 has the same 180W PSU and 140W output as the SD5010T5 EQ, but doesn’t include a 30W-enabled USB 3.2 port.
Advertisement
It may be that Kensington thinks that much headroom is unnecessary for the majority of customers, but evidently, other dock makers see things differently.
Overall, the SD5010T5 EQ delivers the sort of experience that encourages those who have the choice of a laptop or Mini PC with TB5 to side with that technology. For those with TB4 or USB4, there is no practical advantage to this over cheaper docks.
Kensington SD5010T5 EQ: Final verdict
(Image credit: Kensington Technologies)
There is plenty to like here, if you can ignore Kensington’s temptation to make things more expensive than it can easily justify.
Advertisement
However, if you intend to attach three monitors to a dock, then the ports on this one are well organised, unless you use DisplayPort and not HDMI. That could save you additional expense on adapters that other docks require implicitly.
The flip side of those design choices is that there is only one TB5 downlink, so those who designed this device assumed the buyers wouldn’t have more than one TB5 high-performance peripheral. While that might not seem crazy now, in a few years’ time, TB5 or USB4v2 external SSDs might be the norm, creating a bottleneck with this arrangement
In this respect, the SD5010T5 EQ makes a guess about the future: while Thunderbolt 5 is an excellent technology for connecting a dock, it’s too expensive for external storage that isn’t premium-priced. If you agree with that prediction, the SD5010T5 EQ is likely a good fit for you. If you think differently, that faster external drives are going to dominate in the near future, a dock with more TB5 ports would probably be a better choice.
As a product in the broader Thunderbolt 5 docking market, the SD5010T5 fills a specific gap. Entry-level TB5 docks with built-in video outputs and strong USB-C provision are not yet common. If the pricing were more competitive, this dock would be easy to recommend to the right buyer.
Advertisement
Kensington SD5010T5 EQ: Report card
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Value
High-quality product but a premium price
4 / 5
Advertisement
Design
Nice engineering and plenty of ports
4 / 5
Features
Advertisement
Works with TB5, TB4 and USB4, and the native HDMI ports avoid the need for adapters.
4 / 5
Performance
Native TB5 video and dual HDMI, but no DisplayLink, The 180W PSU gets stretched thin if every port is used.
Advertisement
4 / 5
Overall
The price and only a single TB5 downlink stop this device from being a go-to choice.
Compilation Matters: Despite the meteoric rise of generative AI services, traditional image editing tools like Photoshop still dominate the creative industry. So much so that Microsoft – now largely focused on cloud services and AI models – is working hard to find new ways to make Windows-based applications run faster.
Thanks to a close collaboration with Adobe, Microsoft engineers have significantly improved performance in certain Photoshop operations. Photoshop is a large, native desktop application written in C++ and compiled with Microsoft’s Visual C++ compiler on Windows, which is why Microsoft focused on MSVC in an effort to extract additional performance from one of the world’s most widely used image editing applications.
Microsoft explained that the collaboration targeted real-world customer scenarios involving CPU-intensive operations. Many complex image processing workloads are now handled – or in some cases “accelerated” – by the GPU. However, some latency-sensitive tasks, such as brush responsiveness, stroke input, and file-opening operations, still depend heavily on a CPU’s raw performance.
The engineers explored new practical ways to improve Photoshop’s performance at compile time. First, they enabled MSVC’s “peak-performance” compilation mode, which is designed to produce highly optimized binaries on Windows.
Advertisement
They then experimented with profile-guided optimization to further optimize the executables. PGO uses data collected from test runs of .exe and .dll binaries to better reflect real-world usage patterns and improve performance. However, the engineers found that PGO was not an ideal fit for Photoshop’s development workflow, as it adds complexity to the build process.
After trying – and failing – with PGO, the engineers turned to Sample-based Profile Guided Optimizations as a potential alternative. Unlike traditional PGO, SPGO replaces data collected from “representative” workloads with hardware performance samples gathered from actual release binaries. SPGO is also more flexible in terms of data collection, enabling analysis across a diverse set of test and production machines, and can deliver typical performance gains of around 5% to 15%.
Microsoft said SPGO proved to be a better fit for the Photoshop collaboration. Instead of relying on manual tuning, engineers could use compiler feedback – collected with negligible runtime overhead – to improve the code generated during MSVC’s final build process.
SPGO also proved to be more compatible with Adobe’s engineering environment. By combining MSVC’s peak-performance mode with SPGO, the teams were able to improve Photoshop performance by 20% on x64 Windows systems and by 13% on Arm.
Advertisement
As noted by Adobe senior software developer John Fitzgerald, the optimized builds delivered better responsiveness in drawing and stroke operations, file-opening times, and filter processing. “These are among the most frequently used and latency-sensitive interactions in a professional creative workflow, where responsiveness directly affects a user’s ability to work fluidly and iteratively,” Fitzgerald said.
Microsoft said the collaboration with Adobe provides a meaningful foundation for improving performance in software designed for Windows. The company is now highlighting MSVC’s capabilities as a way to improve performance and user experience across its broader software ecosystem.
Like other popular services like Netflix and Max, Hulu is a streaming service that has exclusive series, current-season episodes, hit movies, Hulu Originals, kids shows, and more. There’s also a Hulu plan for nearly every kind of watcher, including streaming content with ads for a service on the cheap, or bundles for additional platforms like Disney+ and ESPN+ to get even more content at reduced prices. I have a Hulu plan to watch some of my favorite shows like critically-acclaimed Atlanta or my current fave wholesome comedy, Abbott Elementary. We at WIRED stay glued to our devices and round up the best movies and the best TV shows currently being streamed on Hulu. Right now, we have outlined various ways to save while streaming on Hulu, including the chance to pay just $1.99 per month with the Hulu student discount.
Get this Hulu Student Discount: $2 Per Month
Students can stream a bevy of shows and movies with Hulu for just $2 per month. This deal saves you 80% off the original monthly subscription price, and is valid for new and existing Hulu subscribers enrolled in an accredited college or university who meet verification qualifications. All you need to do to get Hulu for less than two bucks is verify your student status through SheerID to save.
Enjoy a Hulu TV + Live TV Free Trial
I love my Hulu account, but with half-a-dozen other streaming services, it’s been hard to keep them all, or even know which is worth the money at the end of every month. I’m trying to decide which to keep, and the Hulu TV free trial is an excellent way to test the plan and see if it fits my TV watching needs. There is a free 3-day trial to test it out, and the plan has a $0 Broadcast TV fee, $0 Regional Sports fee, $0 Set-top box or related rental fees, and a $0 administrative fee. The Hulu live TV plan is essentially the best of both worlds—your favorite streaming-only series, along with cable-only content like sports and news programming, including over 95 live TV channels like ABC and ESPN.
Watch the Latest Hulu TV Shows for Less
One of the things I love most about Hulu is that they are constantly adding both new original shows and old favorites. They truly have something for every type of watcher and mood. As a true crime lover (I know it’s problematic, I’m sorry), I’ve been excited to see the Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox.
Advertisement
Here’s what I’m also excited to watch this season. Classic crime drama The Rookie stars perennial heartthrob Nathan Fillion centers on a small-town man becoming the oldest rookie in the LAPD. I always look forward to the feel-good comedy Abbott Elementary, which focuses on a quirky cast of misfits in the public education system in Philadelphia. In R.J. Decker, the titular character is a conman and disgraced newspaper photographer who begins entering the dark underworld of private investigating in South Florida.
Plus, there’s something for everyone, from trash reality TV like The Bachelorette, to intriguing Paradise, to quirky comedy High Potential, to the classic boy cartoon-comedy Family Guy.
UK businesses find Google’s search ranking ‘neither fair nor transparent’, the CMA said.
The UK’s competition watchdog has ordered Google to tweak its search tool to help businesses better integrate with it and understand its workings. As part of the new “conduct requirements”, Google must rank search results organically and make free-of-charge data portability available to third-party businesses.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) awarded Google’s general search and search advertising services with the ‘strategic market status’ (SMS) designation last year. The label is applied to businesses that hold substantial market power and significance in a digital activity, and enables the watchdog to take targeted action to improve competition.
UK businesses find Google’s search ranking “neither fair nor transparent”, the CMA said in its statement yesterday (17 June). Businesses told the watchdog that changes to Google’s search practices are made without sufficient notice, and pointed to a lack of effective ways to raise concerns with the company.
The competition watchdog is attempting to remedy the issue by having Google rank organic search results using “objective and non-discriminatory criteria”. This is to include AI Overviews, but not sponsored results.
Google has also been asked to provide greater transparency to businesses about how search rankings work, give advance notice of any significant changes and introduce clear procedures to raise concerns.
The CMA also intends to address businesses’ data portability concerns with Google. As part of the requirement, Google must provide third-party businesses with the tools to move specified types of user data free of charge.
Advertisement
“Third-party firms are keen to offer people new products and services based on their Google search data but need to be able to access it with confidence,” the CMA said. “Using this data would allow third parties to offer people more personalised features”.
The company has six months to comply with the fair ranking requirement and three months for the data portability requirement.
“Step by step, we’re ensuring that Google’s search services work better for businesses and consumers across the UK,” said Will Hayter, the executive director for digital markets at the CMA.
Advertisement
“Search is a vital gateway for businesses in the UK to reach customers, and clearer, predictable and more transparent ranking systems could give them greater scope to expand and invest.
“These new measures will ensure search results are ranked fairly and objectively, with clearer information about changes and effective routes to raise concerns.
“At the same time, innovative businesses will have the confidence that they can access search data in practice, unlocking investment and innovation in new products and services for users.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
from the lucy-pulling-away-the-copyright-football dept
I can’t say I know for sure that Stephen Colbert is a Techdirt reader, but I very much believe he is. His interests align somewhat with ours, he often comments on some of the same topics we do, and, it turns out, he decided to troll his previous employer during his last show in a very Techdirt-ian manner.
After CBS decided to sacrifice Colbert at the altar of American fascism, the wind down of The Late Show culminated in a final broadcast weeks ago. During that broadcast, Colbert was covering a story about Lee Mendelson Film Productions, which owns the music catalogue for the Charlie Brown franchise, suing several targets for use of its copyrighted music. As he did so, the show band began playing the Charlie Brown theme song. Colbert mused afterwards sarcastically that he hoped that wouldn’t cost CBS any money.
Well played, if only to highlight the absurdity that such a short performance of an iconic song like that could actually result in threats, lawsuits, or demands for payment. But many speculated that the show had already gotten the rights to play the music before it aired, or that Lee Mendelson Film Productions wouldn’t actually do anything about it all to avoid inserting itself into the public spat between Colbert, CBS, and our current government.
Advertisement
Wrong. The company did apparently reach out to CBS, which eventually had to enter into a licensing agreement to avoid any legal issues.
The agreement will see CBS take a license for “Linus and Lucy,” the unofficial Peanuts theme that Colbert’s band played on the air during the show. The proceeds from the deal will be donated to the charity World Central Kitchen, run by Chef José Andrés.
“LMFP found the music’s use on The Late Show funny and entertaining, and is proud to support World Central Kitchen’s mission,” the group’s chairman Jason Mendelson said. A spokeswoman for CBS confirmed the agreement but declined to comment.
On the one hand, I guess it’s nice to see some of CBS’ money go to a good organization like World Central Kitchen. But I do indeed wonder if similar arrangements were struck with the other four entities against which LMFP filed lawsuits. I somehow doubt it. I would guess instead that such treatment was reserved for CBS, in order to make this story more lighthearted and warming.
It’s not, this is stupid, and none of this is as it should be. Colbert shouldn’t have been forced out of his job by a combination of a thin-skinned gibbon and a compliant CBS. It’s insanity that copyright law is in a place where such a diminutive use of a famous song could result in the requirement of a licensing arrangement, never mind actual potential lawsuits. And if it’s so necessary to protect copyright in this instance that lawsuits need to be filed against multiple parties, it should be important enough that any licensing fees and/or damages obtained shouldn’t just be given away to charities.
Advertisement
But as a final poke in CBS’ eye, this was a good one.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login