Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) has patched a critical vulnerability in the ArubaOS-CX network operating system that could lead to remote code execution.
Tracked as CVE-2026-73749, the security issue is a buffer overflow that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to send specially crafted packets to an affected daemon process, achieving code execution with elevated privileges.
“Multiple vulnerabilities exist in a daemon of ArubaOS-CX that may allow for improper processing of malformed input,” reads HPE’s bulletin.
“An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending specially crafted packets to the affected service.”
Affected release branches and fixes listed in the bulletin are:
HPE noted that the AOS-CX 10.10.1181 version has reached End of Maintenance (EOM) and only receives fixes for internally discovered, critical issues, a condition that also applies to CVE-2026-73749.
ArubaOS-CX is HPE Aruba Networking’s operating system for its enterprise-grade network switches, typically used by large businesses, government agencies, universities, healthcare organizations, data centers, and service providers.
HPE’s security bulletin also covers a set of 23 other security vulnerabilities, some with high severity ratings, between 8.1 and 8.8:
The vendor “strongly encourages” customers to upgrade to one of the fixed releases listed in the bulletin.
HPE mentions that, at the time of the bulletin’s publication, it was not aware of active exploitation or publicly available proof-of-concept exploits targeting the listed flaws.
Overall prevention scores can hide what happens after initial access. Once attackers are using valid credentials, prevention drops sharply.
The Blue Report 2026 measures defenses technique by technique across 338 million simulations run in customer production environments.
Jackery first parked a wheeled solar generator on a CES floor in 2024 and called it Solar Mars Bot. Two years of work later, the same rover is back in public, this time at IFA Berlin 2026, still billed as a future product that can hunt sunlight, charge itself, then roll over to you with a few kilowatt-hours in tow.
The IFA coverage from September 4 approaches this gadget as a conceptual prototype rather than a product that is just around the corner. The Jackery website still displays it under Future Products, despite all the fuss at CES 2026 when it promised a US release after two years of research; since then, a few January publications have floated a second-half 2026 release date. However, Berlin has yet to provide any information on the pricing or exact ship date. We still know that the intended markets are the United States and Europe.
Sale
Six modular panels that fold flat for travel sit on top. When you open them, you gain access to up to 600 watts of power. There’s also a double axis arm that allows you to tilt the array up to 60 degrees and turn the entire thing to face the brightest patch of sky. Jackery refers to this little routine as “Solar Light Tracking”: essentially, a sensor detects the ideal angle, then the robot and panels both revolve around, allowing the battery to charge faster than a stationary solar panel left in one spot banging out the same old angle all day.
In terms of power, the body contains a 5,000-watt backup battery, and according to official pages, the inverter side should be able to run any number of appliances up to 3,000 watts, which is plenty for tools, possibly even a small event rig, or a couple of days in a modest little cabin. They demonstrated a unit with three AC outlets at CES in January and were sad that there was no additional USB-C, but you can put it back on the wall and top it up when the sun doesn’t shine. When the light is bad and the battery is running low, the robot should simply plot a route back to a charging base and recharge, and if it does, the tail lights will turn green to indicate that the work has been completed.
Cameras and what they call “AI augmented computer vision” do the rest of the job. We’ve seen follow-me mode, and it worked very well on the CES show floor, with a film of the rover following a humanoid robot around and tapping power on the fly. You can use a 5G radio and a phone app to monitor the battery’s status and location, and then send a call command to have the machine calculate a path to you. It has large hub motors that allow it to traverse difficult terrain, and the housing is made of high-strength plastic and lightweight aluminum that resists weather and corrosion. The early models we saw weighed about 70 kilograms and measured 114 by 82 by 81 centimeters, although Jackery has yet to provide a revised sizing sheet to confirm.
Jackery envisions some serious applications for the device, including off-grid cabins, overlanding, small outdoor events, rescue work, Starlink terminals, and other robots that require a mobile charger. They’ve already received a CES Innovation Award, a TIME Best Inventions Award, iF Design, and A’ Design approval, but they’re not revealing when or how much you’ll be able to get your hands on it. Until then, it’s simply a really nice solar rover sitting at a display at the event, waiting for Jackery to check the “ready to go” box and send it flying.
[Source]
While I wouldn’t call these smart speakers my absolute favorites from Amazon, they have some excellent qualities that make them stand out among the vast lineup of Echo models.
The Echo Studio (2nd Gen) is the best Alexa speaker for sound quality. This is the second version of the Echo Studio to be our audiophile pick. The current version is a similar size to the old Echo (4th gen), but the musical power on this speaker is almost ridiculous. It filled my entire second floor’s long great room with music, and I didn’t even need to reach the highest level of volume to pull it off. Honestly, I’m almost afraid to use it at full blast. Not only was it loud, but clear and delivered a nice amount of bass, beautifully playing soft tones of Tracy Chapman’s “Fast Car” and the piano riffs of “Dark Blue” by Jack’s Mannequin with its three 1.5-inch drivers, plus a 3.75-inch woofer. The harmonizing of “What Is This Feeling?” by Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo sounded beautiful, too. If you’re looking for big sound in an Alexa box, this is it. It’s a similar size to the Apple HomePod, but I like the sound much better and it’s cheaper, too. You’ll also get a built-in smart home hub, spatial audio and Dolby Atmos, tap controls like the Echo Dot Max, and early access to Alexa+ right away.
The Echo Spot (2nd Gen) is the best Alexa speaker for bedside tables. The Echo Spot returned in 2024 after a few years of discontinuation, and it’s a great little bedside companion thanks to its half-circle screen that displays the time, plus any alarms you have set are also visible under the main time. You can customize the clock with a couple of different color and face options, and the screen dims nicely when the lights are out to a gentle red that’s easy to read without lighting up the room. I like asking for alarms set to my latest playlist or some lo-fi jams, and it’s easy to set that up with a voice request. Unlike the Echo Shows, it doesn’t have a distracting, constantly moving slideshow that would be annoying for the bedroom, nor does it display ads or have a built-in camera. (Nobody wants a rogue camera in their bedroom.) It does not have fantastic sound, but it’s plenty loud for an alarm or casual listening while you get dressed in the morning.
The Echo Dot Kids (5th Gen) is the best Alexa speaker for kids. Do your kids really need their own Alexa speaker? That’s up to you. This special edition of the Echo Dot is nearly identical to the fifth-gen Dot above, but it has easy-to-use parental controls that allow you to set time limits, filter explicit content, and review activity. The owl- or dragon-themed sphere comes with a year of Amazon Kids+, which includes thousands of Audible books and other special games and features. After that, you’ll be charged $3 per month. Alexa can help your kids spell, play their favorite music, or—via another speaker in your house—remind them of dinner time.
There are a lot of Echo devices out there, and some third-party speakers that are Amazon Alexa–compatible. Here’s every Alexa smart speaker we’ve tried and what we thought of it. Some of these speakers didn’t raise in price like the models above, which might make them more appealing than before if you’re looking to spend less.
Amazon Echo Dot (5th Gen) With Clock for $60: I like this version of the older Echo Dot that adds an LED clock to the front of the speaker, and was thrilled to see it in stock again last year. The LED clock can also display information like the weather when you ask Alexa questions. It’s once again temporarily out of stock as of this writing, and has had spotty availability (it’s out of stock right now, but Amazon says it’s temporary). Still, it’s a good find when it’s available.
Amazon Echo Hub for $180: The Amazon Echo Hub is similar to an Echo Show, but without the speaker. Instead it’s a thin device that feels a bit like a tablet, designed to be mounted on the wall (or placed on a separately purchased stand, which is how I used it) and used to control your smart home devices. It’s a great choice for anyone who wants something focused on smart home control only. You can still ask Alexa questions and even play music, but the thin speakers aren’t worth playing music from. But you can tell your Echo Hub to play music on a different set of speakers, and even set up default speakers to work with it. It’s a great companion device if you already have a smart home setup.
Amazon Echo Pop for $40: The Echo Pop is a perfectly fine little speaker, and the cutest one in Amazon’s lineup. Does it have great sound? No. It’s fine enough for background tunes or if you’re limited to a dorm room, but you’ll get much better sound for a similar size from the Echo Dot (but you’ll pay a little more, and you won’t get as cute of colors)!
Amazon Echo Show 5 (3rd Gen) for $100: This smart display is another just-fine option, but it’s too small to be a great display, and the included camera makes it a no for a bedside table; better to go with the above Echo Spot or an Echo Dot. This model did raise in price by $10.
Amazon Echo Show 8 (4th Gen) for $200: I usually love an Echo Show 8, but this model didn’t have the same sound quality as the older model. If you’re going to get one of Amazon’s new displays, you’re better off getting the Echo Show 11 ($220) for the same experience with a slightly larger screen (while it’s a 3-inch difference, it doesn’t feel that big) and better sound. This smart display raised in price by $20.
Amazon Echo Show 15 (2nd Gen) for $350: This smart display is a good display, but it clearly wants to double as a TV and isn’t very good at it yet. I’m hoping we see better TV-related performance in the future to make it worth adding to a kitchen or office. It does a great job with widgets, though, thanks to the massive 15.6-inch screen. There’s also the larger Echo Show 21 ($500), which is essentially the same thing but larger. Both of these large displays rose in price—the Show 15 went up $50, while the Show 21 went up $100.
JBL Authentics 200 for $380: This JBL smart speaker supports both Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa, letting you switch between them for different tasks without changing your preference in the app. That makes this speaker particularly appealing for folks with a sprawling collection of smart products from both.
Sonos Era 100 for $219: If you’re looking for a speaker that can talk to Alexa but isn’t necessarily made by Amazon, the Sonos Era 100 is a great option. We just wish we liked the Sonos app better. You can catch our entire guide to the Sonos ecosystem here.
Amazon increased many of its prices last month for its products, affecting the Amazon Echo line as well as Kindles, Fire TV streaming sticks, and Eero routers. It’s not a huge surprise after other companies have done the same this summer, claiming rising costs and chip shortages. Amazon made a similar claim, with a spokesperson blaming increased storage and memory costs. Still, it’s disappointing to see and will lead to a fall sale season with prices that won’t be as impressive as earlier this summer.
Amazon’s Echo devices saw increases from anywhere between $20 and $100, with the larger price increases being for the Echo Shows. The following Echo speakers all faced a price increase:
Photograph: Nena Farrell
Amazon has rolled out the new-and-improved Amazon Alexa, named Alexa+, which is built on generative AI and promises a more powerful assistant that can handle more conversational topics and requests. It’s available for a free 30-day trial; after that, you either pay a $20 monthly fee or become a Prime member. Being a Prime member is the better deal, likely by design. Neither my colleagues nor I have been impressed enough by Alexa+ to say it’s worth paying for on its own. I do like the updated, more conversational voice, and Alexa+ did a good job answering all kinds of questions quickly and thoughtfully. Check out our early access hands-on for everything I thought while testing.
Alexa+ has brought some changes, even for those not using it. It now requires that all voice recordings be sent to Amazon for processing, which wasn’t required before. Amazon has changed its features to support this, and now all recordings with regular Alexa go to Amazon, too. There used to be a “Do Not Send Voice Recordings” privacy feature you could select to have voice requests processed locally, but it was discontinued on March 28, 2025, per an email Amazon sent to current users.
What’s the Difference Between an Echo and an Echo Show?
A regular Echo is a smart speaker, or a speaker with microphones in it so it can hear you speak to it and respond. An Echo Show is a smart display, which has a screen and a camera to let you make video calls, stream content, and see your questions answered on a screen. Both have similar capabilities when it comes to smart home control, answering questions, and playing music, but Echo Shows have extra abilities thanks to the screen. All Echo Shows have a camera and come with a physical camera cover for privacy.
When’s the Best Time to Buy an Echo?
The best time to buy any Amazon speaker is during a major sale event like Black Friday or Amazon Prime Day, when there are often steep discounts. You’ll often see the cheaper speakers for around 50 percent off, and the larger speakers see some nice sale prices too.
How and Where Should You Set Up Your Alexa?
Alexa speakers get the best use in spaces you’re in often. I like setting mine up in my kitchen and living room—usually a display in the kitchen, so I can pull up a recipe or the weather while I make my morning cup of tea, and a speaker in the living room so I can play music and command the lights without a screen to distract from the TV or playing with my son. You can also set one up in the bedroom to use as an alarm clock, but make sure it’s a model without a camera for the best privacy.
Ultimately, what’s most important is that the speaker is somewhere it can hear your commands. Where that will be will vary based on your home, but think about where you’ll be when you ask for the weather or to dim the lights, and place your speaker accordingly.
You’ll set up Alexa speakers using the Alexa app, which allows you to manage multiple Alexa speakers if you own more than one through your Amazon account. Third-party speaker setup methods may vary.
Is Alexa Always Listening?
Alexa is always listening, to a certain extent. It’s designed to only listen for its wake word and shouldn’t be recording or processing any audio unless it hears that word. But Alexa can sometimes mishear a word and think it’s the wake word, or it might hear a word similar enough to activate the speaker. If you’ve owned an Alexa, there have likely been times when the assistant suddenly responds when you weren’t speaking to it. Once it hears the wake word (or what it believes to be the wake word), it will start listening to everything in an attempt to hear what you need and respond.
Alexa+, the latest version of Alexa, will also remain on for a little bit after you ask a question to listen for follow-up questions, no wake word required. Both Alexa and Alexa+ light up in some fashion (regular speakers will turn the light ring blue, while the displays will have a blue bar appear on the screen) to let you know the assistant is listening. Most Echo devices also have a physical mute button and will display a red light or red bar to let you know when the mute is activated.
How Do You Remove Ads and Spam From an Echo Show?
If you’re using an Echo Show device, you’ve likely noticed there is a ton of default content the device will show you. Sports scores! Local news! A recipe you might be interested in! It makes the device exhausting and annoying to be near.
Here’s how you can control what you see:
While you’re able to turn off interest-based ads from third-party skills (this is under Alexa Privacy in the Settings menu), it won’t stop all ads. The only setting that is ad-free is choosing Photo Display mode, which can use either Amazon’s included library of photos or your own. The downside is that it turns it into a digital photo frame, so you won’t even see a clock or features like widgets.
Can I Have My Alexa Requests Locally Processed, or Do They Have to Go to the Cloud?
There used to be a privacy feature called Do Not Send Voice Recordings that let you have all your voice requests processed locally on your Alexa device instead of being sent to Amazon’s cloud storage. That feature was killed in March 2025 to support Alexa+, and even if you continue to use the old Alexa, you don’t have access to that feature any longer.
How Does WIRED Select Smart Speakers to Test? How Are These Speakers Tested?
For this guide, we specifically test speakers that are compatible with Amazon Alexa. It’s a big limitation and narrows down the options significantly, especially compared to speaker options you’ll see in our other guides like the Best Bluetooth Speakers. That’s mainly Amazon’s own ecosystem of speakers, and while there are third-party options, the best options tend to be of Amazon’s own design to work with its own voice assistant.
Each speaker gets installed in a tester’s home for day-to-day use, to see how the microphone performs, how the speaker sounds with different types of music, how well the smart home control features work with compatible devices such as smart lights and video doorbells, and to test other features as necessary (e.g., streaming features on smart displays).
How Does WIRED Get Models? What Does WIRED Do After Testing Them?
We acquire review units usually as a press sample, though we will also independently purchase samples if need be. All review units in this guide were provided as press samples with no obligation to cover or promises for what that coverage would be.
After testing, we keep most of our picks either installed for long-term testing in our homes or in storage to compare against updated models and new speakers that come out. If the sample becomes irrelevant or unnecessary to keep, we donate it locally.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.
Hon Hai reported August revenue of NT$921.8B, about $29.1B, up 52% year on year on AI server demand, well ahead of analyst expectations for the quarter. In June it signed a EUR 120M manufacturing partnership with Bull, the French state-owned computing firm, splitting work between Pardubice and Angers.x
Hon Hai reported an August revenue rise of 52% to NT$921.8B, about $29.1B, Bloomberg News reported on Saturday. July grew 54%, and analysts are looking for around 37% growth in the three months to September, so the company is running well ahead of them.
The Taiwanese company assembles Nvidia’s servers, and its monthly filing has become a check-in for the AI trade. Concerns about overcapacity, rising debt and fierce competition have grown around it, and the revenue line keeps ignoring them.
TNW reported after the second quarter that AI servers now bring in more than everything else Hon Hai makes combined.
The rest is largely Apple. Foxconn, as it is also known, remains the primary iPhone assembler on thinner margins, with plants in China and India, and Apple is spreading work towards Luxshare Precision.
Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Steven Tseng and Rebecca Wang note that the consumer electronics business dilutes the cloud momentum, leaving gross margin and forward price to earnings below the peer average.
So the order book keeps compounding while the market argues about what the spending eventually returns. Demand and confidence have come apart.
TNW has followed that argument through Big Tech’s cash flow, and Chinese investors marked the trade down this week despite the strongest earnings season in five years.
Europe is about to add to the same order book, and it has already picked its assembler.
Bull and Foxconn announced a manufacturing partnership on 1 June with an initial commitment above EUR 120M, according to Bull’s own statement.
Components and initial testing go to Foxconn’s plant in Pardubice, in the Czech Republic. Final assembly, integration and system validation happen at Bull’s factory in Angers.
Foxconn’s head of AI and quantum, Jesse Chao, said the collaboration advances “building sovereign AI infrastructure in Europe” and supports a resilient supply chain.
The French state finished buying Bull from Atos for EUR 404M in April, two months before the Foxconn announcement, and presented the purchase as a sovereignty measure.
The Commission has committed EUR 20B to AI gigafactories, with 77 proposals across 16 member states and construction of the first planned for 2027. The racks will be assembled in France from parts made in Czechia by a Taiwanese company whose monthly revenue is $29B.
The sale of the Seattle Seahawks to the Khosla family officially closed on Thursday, completing a historic ownership transition for the NFL franchise. But a small surprise emerged in the final paperwork.
Nestled among a newly revealed co-owner lineup were a couple familiar names for the Pacific Northwest tech community: former Apptio CEO and longtime Seattle entrepreneur Sunny Gupta, and Nader Naini, managing partner at Seattle-based healthcare private equity firm Frazier Healthcare Partners.
@media (max-width: 600px) {
aside.callout { float:none !important; max-width:100% !important; margin-left:0 !important; margin-right:0 !important; }
aside.callout .callout-img { display:none !important; }
}
Under the final transaction terms announced by the team, Vinod Khosla — the billionaire Silicon Valley venture capitalist who founded Sun Microsystems and Khosla Ventures — will serve as chair, while his wife Neeru Khosla steps in as controlling owner and president of the Seahawks Charitable Foundation. Their son Neal Khosla takes on the role of vice chair.
The conclusion of the sale brings to an end an era of ownership under the estate of late Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, while keeping the franchise’s deep ties to the technology sector intact.
Gupta and Naini appear on a list of co-owners that spans prominent Silicon Valley venture capitalists, global private equity firms, institutional sports investors, and international business dynasties. They include:
When news of the Allen estate’s decision to sell the team first broke, speculation ran rampant — including on GeekWire — about which deep-pocketed tech titan with Seattle ties might step up with almost $10 billion.
Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, MacKenzie Scott, Satya Nadella, Rich Barton, Melinda French Gates — the list of mostly Seattle billionaires who took a pass was lengthy. The Khosla family emerged victorious, but at least brought along a couple heavyweights to keep the local tech flag flying.
@media (max-width: 600px) {
aside.callout { float:none !important; max-width:100% !important; margin-left:0 !important; margin-right:0 !important; }
aside.callout .callout-img { display:none !important; }
}
Gupta brings deep roots in the region’s software ecosystem. He co-founded Bellevue-based enterprise software maker Apptio, guiding it through a public listing, a private equity buyout, and an eventual $4.6 billion sale to IBM in 2023. Gupta served as executive chair at Bellevue-based Smartsheet through its recent $8.4 billion private equity acquisition and launched enterprise AI startup Thira earlier this summer with $21 million in seed funding led by Madrona.
Naini grounds the group in local healthcare private equity and regional sports governance. He joined Seattle-based Frazier Healthcare Partners in 1991 and has led the firm since 1995, helping scale it to manage more than $11 billion in institutional capital globally. Based in Seattle, Naini serves on the board of the Triple-A Tacoma Rainiers baseball team and is active with regional community organizations, including Bellevue-based senior living developer Aegis Living.
The Seahawks will formally introduce the Khosla family via press conference next Wednesday at 11 a.m. PT at Lumen Field. The team opens the 2026 season and defense of its Super Bowl title that night against the New England Patriots.
Kids are heading back to school across the country with a tool in their pocket that will do their homework, answer the questions they’re too embarrassed to ask an adult, and never tell anyone they asked.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
@media (max-width:600px){
.gw-pq{max-width:100%!important;padding:18px 16px!important;margin:28px 0!important}
.gw-pq p:first-of-type{font-size:19px!important;line-height:1.45!important}
.gw-pq p:last-of-type{font-size:15px!important}
}
MIT Technology Review asked kids aged 10 to 18 what they make of AI. Their answers had me plowing through every survey and interview with kids about AI I could find. Plenty of what kids do with it is ordinary: looking things up, homework, messing around.
This article is about the parts they keep to themselves.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
1. Kids are taking their mental health to a chatbot, and telling nobody.
Nearly one in five Americans aged 12 to 21 has asked a chatbot for help when feeling sad, angry or nervous. RAND puts it at 8.2 million young people, and 63% of them told no one at all.
The silence is a calculation about what adults would do, as one teenager explained to YouGov’s researchers.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
The most vulnerable kids use chatbots more.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
2. Kids see both sides of AI in school.
Some teenagers see AI as a shortcut past the hard parts of schoolwork.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
Others describe using it the opposite way.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
Between May and December 2025, RAND watched homework use among middle school, high school and college students climb from 48% to 62%. Over a slightly longer stretch, from February, the share saying AI harms critical thinking climbed from 54% to 67%. The same students can hold both thoughts at once.
The Concord Monitor interviewed eight New Hampshire high schoolers this spring. They weren’t outraged at their classmates, but they described losing motivation to do the work themselves. One in ten teens tells Pew they do all or most of their schoolwork with a chatbot’s help.
Caledonia Mahon, a Concord High senior, watched a classmate stand up and admit he’d had ChatGPT write a personal reflection, and started wondering why she was still writing her own.
Her classmate Andrew Pfitzenmayer supplied the detail I can’t get out of my head, about a boy in his advanced history class.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
Yet, the same technology can be positive for kids who don’t have much else.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
By May 2025, 84% of American high schoolers were using AI for schoolwork at least occasionally. The kids who lean on it hardest have the least support around them, which is why telling them to quit doesn’t work.
If quitting isn’t the option, what’s left is changing what the tool does when a kid opens it. Two Seattle startups are trying that.
3. Kids are writing the rules adults haven’t.
Suspicion of AI runs strongest among the kids furthest from it: 78% of students who don’t use AI say it harms critical thinking, against 60% of those who do.
In July, 98 high schoolers from all 50 states spent three days in a replica of the U.S. Senate chamber in Boston and passed what Congress hasn’t. Their STUDENTS FIRST Act requires AI literacy, bars teachers from letting AI decide a grade on its own, lets a teacher ask a student to defend suspected work out loud, and gives any student the right to an alternative to an AI assignment.
A majority of educators told Education Week’s Research Center last fall that their district has no AI policy, or that they don’t know whether it does. At least seven states have a comprehensive one, by Education Week’s count.
Ashley Kannan has taught social studies for almost 30 years in Oak Park, Ill. He planned to ignore AI, then noticed that every conversation about it in his building was about catching students. He recruited nine eighth graders to spend a year working out what AI was actually good for. In April they briefed 60+ teachers and parents on the rules they thought were needed.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
Hazel is 17, a rock climber in New York who wants to be an ecologist. She won’t touch AI, and her reason is specific: what data centers do to the water supplies of the towns they’re built in. Asked what advice she’d give other kids, she gave four words.
@import url(‘https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto+Slab:wght@500&display=swap’);
Hazel can afford that advice. Most kids can’t.
So the practical alternative is narrower than just telling them to quit: ask them what they use AI for, ask what they’ve decided not to use it for, and don’t make an honest answer cost them the tool. Right now 61% of young people say their parents rarely or never talk to them about AI, and 53% say the same of their teachers.
Hazel may walk away from AI. But Amira, describing a pain in her side to a chatbot, may not, and the odds are nobody in her house knows she’s doing it.
Up until recently, anyone into fitness probably had a smartwatch. These tiny computers would sit on your wrist, track health metrics, and also show notifications from your phone to help you stay connected. Well, that has changed recently. With Instagram trying to suck all of my time and WhatsApp becoming a home for advertising, I’ve found myself not wanting to wear a smartwatch anymore. It just doesn’t let me stay in the moment, and every time it buzzed, I’d instinctively pick up my phone. Apparently, I’m not the only one dealing with smartphone fatigue, which is exactly why screenless wearables have taken off. These retain all the workout features of a smartwatch, sometimes even more, and remove the annoying parts like the screen.
Surely, you’ve heard about Whoop. It’s been the screenless tracker to get, worn by stars like Ronaldo and LeBron James. The thing is, Whoop costs a minimum of $199 every year. And without a subscription, you can’t even access your data. There is also Google’s Fitbit Air, but it’s not available in India yet. So, when Noise, the guys I bought my first smart band from a decade ago, came up with a screenless fitness tracker, the Rep Band, I was quite excited. It costs ₹9,999, and you don’t have to pay for any subscription. The band tracks many of the same metrics, such as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, HRV, sleep tracking, and more. And if you’re thinking about ditching your smartwatch, don’t worry. I’ve been testing the Rep Band for almost a month and have taken it to various workout sessions.
Noise REP Band
Summary
The Noise REP Band is a very competent take on the screenless fitness tracker game, without the predatory feel of Whoop’s subscription model. Everything you need is included in the price, and I’d be keeping it as my primary workout tracker for several reasons. The biggest reason is its accurate workout tracking, backed by genuinely useful insights into recovery and sleep. The app presents all this data in a very digestible form, especially the three scores, which are great.
Let’s get one thing straight: the Whoop and Noise Rep are made for different people. The Whoop is for professional athletes, while Noise Rep is for people like me. Someone who goes to the gym pretty regularly, tries to be fit, and wants a general overview of their health. Keeping that in mind, I love the Noise Rep band’s design. It’s similar to a Whoop in that there is a fabric band that wraps around your wrist. Up top, you get a stainless-steel frame that contains the tracking puck and looks surprisingly premium.
You can play with different strap colors, with Orange being the boldest. I used the beige band for the majority of my testing. Yes, it does get dirty after a week of use, but you can just wash it, and it’ll be like new. What is better than the Whoop, though, is the closing mechanism. The Rep band uses a standard Velcro mechanism, which is orders of magnitude better than fiddling with the metal clasp on the Whoop.
The good stuff continues in comfort. The Rep band weighs just 27g. It was a lot more comfortable than wearing a smartwatch, and better at the whole wear-it-and-forget-it idea. It is a little wider than the Fitbit Air, but I’m not complaining. Like the Air, the Rep band has a haptic motor that vibrates when you start or stop a workout. I’d have loved to see a haptic alarm too. On the side, there’s a little LED indicator that lights up when the band is charging or when you put it on.
The Noise Rep tracks almost everything you’d expect from a modern fitness tracker. These include steps, heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), breathing rate, resting heart rate, body temperature, stress, calories, and workouts. Support for blood oxygen is coming soon. Since there is no screen to distract you, everything is managed by the Noise app. While I do agree it looks a bit like the Whoop app, I’m not complaining. It’s a very slick, modern take that shows all fitness data without feeling cramped and is genuinely intuitive in some ways.
Up top, there are three scores: Sleep, Recovery, and Effort. Sleep tracks how well you slept last night, taking into account stages like REM and deep sleep, as well as whether you were actually asleep or simply lying in bed. This data is presented as a timeline, allowing you to better understand what happened. The app combines that data into a score, then uses AI to explain what went well and what could have been better. The band also measures your skin temperature variability, which can be a good indicator of when you might get ill.
Next to the Sleep score is Recovery. It refers to how ready your body is to take on strain the next day. You can use it to plan the perfect time to hit a bench PR. There is even an Effort score. It measures the load your body takes on during the day with workouts or walking, and gives you the ideal range of how much you should push. Underneath that, you’ll find your vitals and other important metrics. You can also log in water intake, but there is no food logger, so keep that in mind.
Workouts have a different section. Here, the headline metric is Stamina, which, as the name suggests, estimates how much energy your body has left for the day. The higher the number, the better. The actual workout options range from essential walking, trekking, and running to sports like Cricket, Football, swimming, Pilates, Yoga, Strength training, and much more. I stuck with Strength Training since that’s pretty much all that I do. The band also measures your overall training load. Lastly, Training Effect summarizes what each workout did for your body. All super helpful stuff.
Where things do take a bit of a downturn is in the overall app experience. Don’t get me wrong, Noise has done a lot of clever work, but the app still lacks polish. For example, workouts and general health data take time to sync, and I often have to pull down to refresh the home screen multiple times before the data syncs. There have been several instances when I clicked on something and a “Please Wait” pop-up appeared. It usually goes away, but sometimes the app gets stuck and requires a force close.
All the bickering about the features and bugs aside, workout tracking is the most important aspect of a fitness band. And yes, the Noise Rep band is pretty good at it. For context, I used it alongside my Galaxy Watch for a few different workout sessions. During those sessions, the band stayed within a 5% margin of error for heart rate. Calorie estimations were pretty much on par, and even the steps were counted equally. The Rep band does not have GPS support built in. It can, however, use your phone’s GPS to log that data.
Sleep tracking was another pleasant surprise. I found the Rep band to be slightly more accurate in measuring actual sleep duration, including the few bathroom breaks I took during the night. It knows when I’m actually sleeping or just lying in bed restless. One night, I woke up for a bathroom break, and just couldn’t sleep again. The next day’s sleep score dropped to 67 (my sleep scores are usually around 80), which reflected exactly how I felt. The band suggested I take it easy at the gym that day, which I did. Battery life lasted me a full week of continuous use. You do get an alert in the app when the charge is below 20%, which is when I’d recommend putting the band on the included charger.
At ₹9,999, or ₹8,999 if you buy early, the Noise REP Band did surpass my expectations. It’s a very competent take on the screenless fitness tracker game, in a way that doesn’t seem predatory like Whoop’s subscription model. Everything you need is included in the price, and I’d be keeping it as my primary workout tracker for several reasons. The biggest reason is its accurate workout tracking, backed by genuinely useful recovery and sleep insights. The app presents all this data in a very digestible form, especially the three scores, which are great. Is it perfect, though? Nope. The Noise app still needs some work on app sync times and random bugs that are definitely annoying. Blood oxygen monitoring is also coming soon, so we’d have to wait and see how that pans out.
Inverse shares a movie success story from last weekend:
Coyote vs. Acme debuted to $15.9 million at the box office, beating out iconic director Ridley Scott’s latest sci-fi adventure, The Dog Stars. This success has only continued since, and the worldwide box office currently sits above $22 million. Strong reviews and word-of-mouth are sure to keep viewers coming in, especially during the holiday weekend.
What’s impressive is Coyote vs. Acme had a limited marketing campaign that includes viral stunts. They photographed the movie’s world premiere with a vintage Tasmanian Devil polaroid camera, and launched a phone number for the law firm suing Acme. (“If you’ve been injured by an enormous rubber band, press 7. If you’ve been injured by painted train tunnel that suddenly sprang to life, press 8…”)
And Cartoon Brew reports that Wednesday “the famously silent Looney Tunes star participated in an AMA on Reddit’s r/movies, answering questions about his career, his relationship with the Road Runner, and the Warner Bros. executive who nearly prevented audiences from seeing his latest movie.”
In keeping with tradition, Wile E. delivered his responses through images of himself holding signs. The format produced several interesting and occasionally thought-provoking exchanges, but one obvious highlight came when a user asked: “Rumor has it that David Zaslav was paid off by ACME to cancel your film; what is your opinion on this?” Wile E.’s response was an image of the coyote glaring at the camera while holding a sign that read, “It’s a limited number of signs,” pulled from a scene in the film when Mr. Coyote first meets his eventual attorney Kevin Avery, played by Will Forte.
Meanwhile, Boing Boing cites local news reports that a Southern California bird watcher Alexander DeBarros has actually captured a photo of a coyote holding a roadrunner bird in its mouth:
In an incredible coincidence that is a movie publicist’s dream, he snapped the rare, possibly unprecedented, photo on the opening weekend of the movie Acme vs. Coyote… In an even more incredible coincidence, DeBarros’s father, Brian Mainolfi, is an animator whose first job in the field was working for Chuck Jones, the creator and director of the Roadrunner cartoon series.
Cartoon Brew notes a Reddit user specifically asked the Coyote for his reaction to the news.
Wile E. responded with some unexpectedly healthy advice: “We cannot judge our worth on the work of others.”
Aftermath calls the movie “a well made, deeply funny movie that pays a deep respect to the Looney Tunes in a way that Warner Brothers currently seems uninterested in doing.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Every year around this time, Apple announces new iPhones. The products go on sale soon after, usually ranging from a base model to more premium and more expensive Pro models. But this year will likely be different—not just because the company has a brand-new CEO.
Apple’s iPhone event will be held on September 9 at 10 am Pacific (1 pm Eastern), announced last week with the title “Surprise and Shine!” If you tune into the livestream, expect the announcement of an iPhone 18 Pro, 18 Pro Max, and, if all the rumors and widely held analyst expectations are true, the first look at an Apple foldable device.
Based on leaks and the ongoing tech rumor mill and its decent track record for figuring these things out, Apple is expected to prioritize its more expensive, premium devices this year and hold off on announcing its base model iPhone 18. That cheaper model is rumored to launch in the spring of 2027, potentially alongside an iPhone 18e and maybe a second-generation iPhone Air.
Why the drastic change in strategy? It may be due to the ongoing memory shortage, which has made just about everything more expensive. Apple hasn’t been spared. In June, former Apple CEO Tim Cook acknowledged that Apple would raise product prices to keep up with manufacturing costs.
“Our assumption is that they’re going to be launching three models in the fall, the premium side of the models of the 18 series,” says Nabila Popal, a senior director of data and analytics at IDC. “Then the mid/budget devices will be launched in the spring.”
Popal says it’s a smart strategic move because Apple is aiming to spread out its revenue between a usually very strong fourth quarter and a typically much weaker spring quarter the following year. Apple’s portfolio has also expanded, and the iPhone Pro and Pro Max lineup are more enticing for people already prepared to spend the money on a new iPhone.
When components become more expensive, companies have three real options: Eat the costs, raise prices, or, as Apple seems to be doing, lean into it. By moving its cheaper options to a later date, Apple can drum up excitement for its bigger, better, pricier offerings. When it charges more for those, it is likely to be less off-putting than making a cheap phone even more expensive. It’s part of a “premiumization” of devices, as Popal calls it, that Apple hopes to leverage and build hype for its pricier options.
Shawn DuBravac, chief economist at the Global Electronics Association, tells WIRED he is optimistic about what these kinds of rising prices ultimately mean for customers.
“Throughout the history of time, the deflationary pressures of technology have always flowed to the consumer,” DuBravac says. “I’m confident that will be the case again. It just will take some time for the markets to solidify.” In other words, new technologies launch with a high price, but manufacturing efficiencies and competition inevitably drive costs down for consumers.
That may not be the case anytime soon for folding phones, which are seeing higher prices than ever. Samsung’s entire 2026 Galaxy Z folding smartphone range saw price increases, as did Google’s new Pixel 11 Pro Fold, and Motorola’s Razr 2026 models. Apple’s folding iPhone is rumored to cost around $2,000.
To help mitigate those high costs, Apple is turning to financing options and trade-in programs. In July, the company launched an iPhone leasing program that lets people pay a monthly fee to rent the newest iPhones, then swap them out when a new device releases. The program will undoubtedly help more people afford the newest devices, but ownership advocates have criticized it, saying it keeps you from truly owning and managing your device. It also fits Apple’s broader effort to turn all of its products into a subscription service.
Apple could be preparing a new MacBook tier that would sit between the MacBook Air and MacBook Pro, according to a new product roadmap from research firm Omdia.
The unannounced model is expected to feature a 13.8-inch OLED display and could arrive in 2029. That would give Apple another option for buyers who want a more advanced display than the current MacBook Air, without stepping up to the higher-end MacBook Pro.
Omdia’s latest roadmap places the 13.8-inch MacBook in a new product category between the Air and Pro lines. The machine is expected to use a single-stack hybrid OLED panel, rather than the more advanced tandem OLED technology reportedly planned for future MacBook Pro models.
The display could also bring several features not currently found on Apple’s laptop lineup, including an LTPO+ backplane, integrated touch sensing and an under-panel camera. Omdia also expects the OLED panel to feature a colour filter integrated into the OLED encapsulation layer.
Interestingly, the roadmap doesn’t show an OLED MacBook Air. Instead, the 13.8-inch OLED model appears as an entirely separate product, while the MacBook Air is expected to continue using LCDs through to 2030.
Some evidence suggests Apple has at least explored a MacBook with this display size. A June report from ZDNet Korea claimed Apple had approached Samsung Display, LG Display and BOE for information about 13.8-inch OLED panels earlier this year. At the time, the assumption was that these panels could be intended for an OLED MacBook Air.
Omdia now appears to have a different view, suggesting the panel could instead be used for a new MacBook tier aimed at the mainstream market.
There’s still plenty of uncertainty here. Omdia’s roadmap is based on current market expectations, while Apple’s plans could change depending on OLED production capacity, component costs and its wider product strategy. The machine is also reportedly three years away, so it’s worth treating this one as a long-term possibility rather than a firm product plan.
Apple TV just confirmed that Silo is returning for a fourth season on July 9, 2027, and the teaser that dropped with the announcement gives us glimpses of what happens next. The final chapter will pick up after the dramatic events of Season 3, with Juliette Nichols preparing for a direct confrontation that could determine the fate of every silo.
Season 3 expanded the story by revealing the truth about Silo 1, where survivors from the past oversee the remaining silos. The teaser shows Juliette returning with a new purpose after uncovering those secrets. Instead of simply trying to survive, she is now determined to challenge the people controlling the underground world.
Apple says the new season follows Juliette as she uncovers even more hidden truths while fighting to protect the future of the silos. The teaser also hints that the conflict between Silo 18 and Silo 1 will become the central focus.
According to showrunner Graham Yost, the season can be summed up in two words: “It’s war.” The story will also spend more time inside Silo 1, giving viewers a closer look at how it operates and the people pulling the strings.
Season 4 will expand its focus inside Silo 1, bringing side characters like Senator Rosalind Thurman, her daughter Anna, and aide Henry further into the spotlight. But the bigger payoff might be closure on characters who’ve been missing since the explosion that first sent everyone underground.
Journalist Helen Drew disappeared from the story after that moment, and Yost has confirmed her fate is exactly what season 4 plans to reveal, along with flashbacks connecting her time inside Silo 18 to the present. Whatever happened to trillionaire Per Stensen remains a separate open question the show hasn’t addressed yet, but we see a glimpse in the teaser.
The final season brings back Rebecca Ferguson, Common, Harriet Walter, Chinaza Uche, Avi Nash, Ashley Zukerman, Jessica Brown Findlay, and Steve Zahn. With a release date now locked in, Silo is heading toward its ending with a lot riding on it, and a full cast ready to bring its sprawling mystery to a close next year.
Bitcoin price stalls near $82K as key resistance holds
Best Gaming Laptops, CPUs, TVs, And Keyboards To Upgrade Your Set Up For GTA VI
The Birds Outside, Drawn For You Automatically
IMF Says El Salvador’s Post-Review Bitcoin Purchases Used No Public Funds
U.S. added stronger than expected 162,000 jobs in August as labor market bounced back
Alexandre Pato consortium’s Northampton Town investment approved
Golden Eaglets Drawn in Group B for 2026 WAFU B U17 Championship
Commanders’ Chig Okonkwo is a top breakout fantasy football candidate
XRP price breaks falling channel as bulls target $1.53
A new European chapter for Gibraltar
The House | Bin the lectures, bring gossip and be ready to banter: how the new PM should prepare for his Trump encounter
How To Avoid Winter Colds: 4 Everyday Habits That Spread Germs, Says Pharmacist
From warning to listing: UK’s largest retail investment platform opens access to crypto ETNs
Weekend Open Thread: Beyond Yoga
A Worthy Android Ereader, With Some Tradeoffs
FinCEN flags $12.7B tied to Southeast Asia crypto investment scams
Trezor Data Breach Impacts 67,000 More US Customers
33 Cosy Autumn Home Decor Ideas: Blankets, Pumpkin Decorations, And Candles
Seven wickets in 21 balls: Sri Lanka’s Chamari Athapaththu scripts history with record-breaking spell
How To Edit Claude’s Memory
You must be logged in to post a comment Login