Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

I Live in Massachusetts, and the Tartan Army Is the Best Thing to Hit My News Feed

Published

on

Up until a few weeks ago, I had never heard of the Tartan Army (despite being one-quarter Scottish and having an actual family tartan of my own!). But now that the World Cup has begun and the Scotland fans known as the Tartan Army have descended on my home state of Massachusetts, they’re inescapable. And that’s not a bad thing. 

Full disclosure: I live in a suburb outside Boston, so I haven’t had any firsthand experiences with any of these kilted soldiers, but I have been following their exploits in the news and on social media, and I’m so glad they’re here. (If I were in a neighboring house to visiting tourists who were playing bagpipes throughout the day, it’s possible I’d feel differently.)

The Tartan Army has been going viral over the past week or so, partly due to their sheer numbers — it’s estimated up to 40,000 Scottish fans have traveled to Massachusetts for the group stage of the tournament — and partly because of the festive atmosphere they’ve brought to places like Fenway Park. Upwards of 10,000 fans attended a Red Sox game last weekend, and on the streets, they’ve marched while wearing their signature kilts and playing the bagpipes. And they’ve done their research as tourists, too. 

Advertisement

They know that the real tourist attractions in Boston are Dunkin’ and the Cop Slide, a slide at the playground on Boston’s City Hall Plaza known for causing injuries because some people accelerate so fast. The slide went viral when a police officer attempted to use the slide and… it didn’t go well. (We can laugh now because he’s OK.) But this is why we now have a video of a man playing the bagpipes while descending the Cop Slide.

I don’t know if anyone thought that would be one of the byproducts of hosting the World Cup, but this World Cup has provided us with so many unexpected and delightful moments. The Cape Verdean goalkeeper, Vozinha, who went from virtual unknown to worldwide legend during his team’s 90-minute match against Spain, is another story that’s sparking joy, along with yet another viral police officer video, this time of Boston cops joyfully dancing with fans after the Cape Verde-Spain match. All these little dopamine hits really add up.

Bostonians and most New Englanders have a reputation for not being warm. It’s a remnant of the Puritanical and stoic values imported by our earliest settlers and that have lingered for centuries — this can make us seem standoffish and aloof at times, when really it’s more an innate reservedness that some of us can’t shake, no matter how hard we try. But the Scots are cracking our tough outer shell, at least temporarily.

A scroll through TikTok will turn up dozens of videos of gratitude, both from the Scots, thanking Boston for the warmth they’ve been shown, and from locals who have been charmed by the exuberant and joyful visitors. Fans and pundits alike keep talking about how the World Cup really has become the great unifier we need right now, and the influx of Scottish tourists in our state feels like it has lifted the local mood. 

Advertisement

But alas, we won’t get to call the Tartan Army ours for long. The team and their fans will stick around for one more match on June 19 against Morocco before traveling down to Miami for their final group-stage match against Brazil on June 24. Sure, Miami has beautiful beaches, and we’ll probably get a viral video of a bagpiper on a jet ski out of this, but we’ll miss the Tartan Army when they’re gone. At least we’ll always have Cop Slide.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Hugging Face CEO calls for ‘radical transparency’ after ‘unprecedented’ OpenAI hack

Published

on

After OpenAI recently admitted that one of its models had breached the systems of AI platform Hugging Face, Hugging Face’s CEO Clem Delangue posted on X that he was flying to San Francisco to have “a little chat with that ‘rogue agent.’”

Then, in a follow-up post on Saturday, Delangue outlined what he’d asked for from OpenAI. He said he called for “radical transparency,” asking OpenAI to “release the traces from the ‘rogue’ agents so the entire research community can study what happened.”

And he also wants “more capabilities for defenders,” calling for OpenAI to commit $100 million worth of computing power “to help the Hugging Face community build powerful cyber defenses with the best open and closed models.”

Delangue added, “The first autonomous agent cyberattack is an unprecedented event. It deserves an unprecedented response!”

Advertisement

Despite the autonomous nature of the attack, cybersecurity experts suggested that it could also be blamed on human error — namely, OpenAI’s apparent failure to properly configure what should have been a fully isolated testing environment.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Pope’s official prayer app commits cardinal sin, leaks 700K+ users’ info

Published

on

Security

(Security) hole-ier than thou

Click To Pray, a prayer app endorsed by the Pope with hundreds of thousands of users worldwide, has leaked people’s names and email addresses for months – or longer – according to an ethical hacker who said she found and reported the security vulnerability six months ago to no avail. This app needs to take a vow of silence when it comes to your personal information.

The app, available in seven languages and on iOS, Android, and clicktopray.org, is the official app of the Pope’s Worldwide Prayer Network. It connects users across the globe to pray for the Holy Father’s intentions, and as of July 2026, it has 719,517 registered accounts.

Advertisement

It’s also very leaky, according to security sleuth BobDaHacker, who says she spotted and disclosed the vulnerability to the Pope’s Worldwide Prayer Network on January 3.

“The vulnerability is still live,” the hacker said in a Friday blog. “Nobody has ever responded. I guess my email wasn’t in their prayers.”

The Reg readers likely remember BobDaHacker for her previous research exposing a free-food flaw in McDonald’s ordering system and open controls on Chinese robot manufacturer Pudu Robotics.

This latest security hole stems from an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) bug in the prayer app. This is a very common and easy-to-exploit type of flaw that occurs when a website or an app blindly accepts user-provided input to view or modify resources without checking to see if the user is actually authorized to retrieve the data.

Advertisement

“You ask for your own data, the server gives it to you,” BobDaHacker explains. “You ask for someone else’s data, the server gives you that too. Thou shalt not authorize, apparently.”

When you sign up for a Click To Pray account, the app assigns you a sequential numeric user ID. As BobDaHacker uncovered, the API endpoint GET https://api[.]clicktopray.org/user/users/{id} will return user data for any account – not just your own account – so long as you supply a valid, five-digit user ID. 

It doesn’t perform any authorization check or ownership validation. “Just increment the number and get someone else’s data,” she wrote.

This data includes users’ email addresses, first and last names, country, dates of birth, and whether the account has been deleted, and the API exposes all 719,517 accounts on the prayer site. “With sequential user IDs and no rate limiting, an attacker could enumerate every single account on the platform,” the hacker explained. “One GET request per user. for i in range(1, 719518): scrape(). That’s it. That’s the exploit.”

Advertisement

As BobDaHacker points out, many of these users are likely older individuals, not all that tech savvy, and very trusting of anything Vatican related, making these exposed accounts a “phishing goldmine.”

“Imagine getting an email that says ‘The Holy Father requests your urgent attention’ with a Vatican-looking link,” she wrote. “Grandma is clicking that. Every time.”

And then it gets even worse.

The signup endpoint, POST https://api.clicktopray.org/user/users/sign-up, returns the account’s validation_hash directly in the response body, and that value is the same UUID used in the email verification link. This means someone could sign up using any email address and verify the account before the confirmation message reached the inbox.

Advertisement

Plus, BobDaHacker’s email client flagged the real verification email with a warning that it had failed the domain’s authentication requirements and might have been spoofed or improperly forwarded.

“So not only is the API leaking 700,000 email addresses that could be used for phishing, but the real emails from Click To Pray already look like phishing,” the hacker noted. “An attacker wouldn’t even need to try hard. They could send a pixel-perfect phishing email and it would have the same level of email authentication as the real thing: none. God works in mysterious ways.”

The Register reached out to the Pope’s Worldwide Prayer Network and did not receive any response. BobDaHacker says she’s still praying for one, too.®

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Why Do Phones Still Use Battery When Powered Off?

Published

on

Your battery is continually losing charge.

Even though smartphone batteries are getting bigger and more efficient, there’s always that inevitable event when you get a low battery notification at the worst possible time. You might think powering down the phone entirely is a way to make your smartphone last longer. But like with any battery-powered device, a phone’s battery will slowly deplete when you’re not actively using it, and even when it’s completely powered down.

Of course, the battery drains much more slowly when turned off, so it’s not a bad idea to power down the phone to conserve battery. That might be before a plane takes off, for example, and you want to ensure you have power when you arrive at your destination. If you leave an old phone in a drawer for weeks or months then decide to use it, however, you’ll find that the battery isn’t still at the same percentage it was when you left it.

Advertisement

Why the battery depletes

Why does this happen? One thing that draws battery from your phone while it’s off is a clock-and-wake circuit, which uses a tiny amount of current so that the power button responds when you want to turn it on and so the phone immediately knows the right time and date once it boots back up. But the biggest battery drain is something called a self-discharge, a chemical release of the lithium-ion batteries used in phones. The battery will lose about 1-2 percent of its power every month or so when turned off. If you store it in a spot that’s above room temperature, it will deplete even faster than that.

If you leave the phone on and don’t use it, the battery will logically drain much more quickly. I have left Android phones I’m testing untouched for up to a week, for example, and they easily go from about half charge to completely dead in that time. That said, if you’re giving a phone a break, it’s still a good idea to power it down completely. While there’s still that self-discharge, it will be much slower than if you leave the phone on. When the device is on, the screen lights up for notifications, the radio remains active and latched onto signals, and background apps are using power.

Advertisement

Keep it half charged

If you plan to keep a phone tucked away long-term, like if you upgraded and you’re waiting for your pre-teen to become of age so they can use it, it’s wise to keep the device charged consistently to avoid damage. Apple recommends not fully charging your phone before you put it away for an extended period, suggesting you charge an iPhone only to about 50 percent. Then recharge it every so often (Apple recommends every six months) so it’s always topped up and not lying completely dormant.

This prevents something called a deep-discharge state, which can happen when a device’s battery has been completely dead for a long period of time. If it gets to this point, the phone’s battery’s copper current collector can dissolve, redeposit, and permanently impact the phone’s battery capacity, or even potentially cause a short circuit. At the very least, the loss in battery capacity means the phone wont last as long per charge going forward.

Tips for keeping the battery healthy

To recap, if you’re storing a phone, power it down when the battery is at about 50 percent and charge it back up to this point at least every six months. Most importantly, don’t throw it in a drawer completely dead nor fully charged. Don’t forget to store it in a cool, dry place with temperatures below 90°F.

All that said, leaving a phone lying around for months isn’t a total death sentence. I have left some of the best Android phones released over the last five years powered down for months and charged them for comparative reviews. They work fine even if the battery capacity isn’t as good. I even recently found an old BlackBerry PlayBook tablet that hadn’t been booted up since 2011. I plugged it in and it successfully charged and works! But it’s clear the battery life has lessened as it barely lasts a day before I need to recharge it. 

Advertisement

The bottom line is that if you power down your phone, it won’t have the same charge state when you power it back up, especially if weeks or months have gone by. It might still show the same battery percentage if you’ve only powered it down for a 12-hour flight, but the battery is still draining through self-discharge and the clock-and-wake circuit, albeit so slowly you won’t notice after such a short period of time. However long you turn off the phone, powering down doesn’t mean the phone’s battery is completely on pause until you use it again. But it can help conserve what battery life you have left in a pinch.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Hyundai & Kia’s New UV Sanitizing Tech Is A Germaphobe Driver’s Dream

Published

on





For most owners, keeping a vehicle ultra-clean isn’t an easy task. Nonetheless, the health benefits of having a car that’s free from germs are inarguable. Hyundai and Kia just unveiled new technology that aims to help make eliminating those germs a lot easier.

The carmaker is calling the technology “Plasma Care UVC,” and it uses far-ultraviolet C light with a wavelength of about 200-230 nanometers to sterilize a car’s cabin. UV sterilization devices are not new, but traditionally, some use UV light of a slightly longer wavelength than Hyundai’s new system. As a result, they have the potential to cause skin and eye damage if a human is exposed to them.

Advertisement

Hyundai says the far-UVC light it is using in its new technology won’t cause damage, since the light doesn’t penetrate human skin. However, it does still penetrate into bacteria and viruses, making it an effective way to sanitize a car even when the driver and passengers are present.

Although this is the first time that far-UVC light sanitizers have been fitted to a vehicle cabin, similar systems that use the same wavelength of light are already used to clean rooms in healthcare settings like hospitals, as well as sanitizing hotels and classrooms

Hyundai says that its engineers encountered several challenges when trying to make the system work in cars, with one of the biggest being that the existing systems were simply too big to fit. Its team had to develop a new, miniaturized version of the system, as well as fitting an optical filter to ensure that no UV light of a harmful wavelength was emitted.

Advertisement

Far-UVC technology isn’t available in production cars yet

To test that the system worked as intended, the carmaker fitted it to a PV5 minivan. This model in particular was picked because it can be used for a range of different transport jobs, shuttling both passengers and cargo to their destinations.

Following the initial successful tests, Hyundai said that its technology could potentially be applied to autonomous vehicles and PBVs, a term that it has previously used to describe its modular electric vehicles that can be designed for a specific job. It gave the examples of school minibuses and food selling vehicles as two instances where sanitizing technology might be especially useful.

Advertisement

As appealing as the new technology might sound to germaphobes, it isn’t available to the general public just yet. Hyundai has not given a timeframe for when the UV sanitizers might launch in its production vehicles, saying only that it needs to conduct more safety and technical validation tests before it gives them approval for production.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Three Astronauts Safely Return from Space Station, Landing in Kazakhstan Steppe

Published

on

“Welcome home!” NASA posted on X.com, sharing footage of a successful “parachute-assisted” landing on a Kazakhstan steppe for the Soyuz MS-28, carrying three astronauts who’d spent 241 days on the International Space Station. (And YouTube has a full two-hour video with NASA’s coverage of the landing.)

A NASA web page notes they orbited Earth 3,856 times and traveling more than 102 million miles after docking with the Space Station on November 27. It was the first mission for NASA astronaut Chris Williams and Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergei Mikaev (and the second mission for Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey Kud-Sverchkov). “After routine post-landing medical checks, recovery teams will fly the crew by helicopter to Karaganda, Kazakhstan. Williams then will board a NASA aircraft bound for the agency’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The last Space Shuttle returned to Earth 15 years ago

Published

on

SCIENCE

So, how are those commercial replacements working out for you, NASA?

This week marks 15 years since a Space Shuttle last returned from orbit and the end of NASA’s Space Shuttle program.

Space Shuttle Atlantis landed at the Shuttle Landing Facility (SLF) at Kennedy Space Center 15 years ago this week, marking the final mission for the program.

Advertisement

STS-135 was originally designated STS-335, the Launch On Need (LON) mission for the previous STS-134 flight of Space Shuttle Endeavour. LON missions had been a feature of the Space Shuttle program following the Columbia disaster.

If a Space Shuttle was damaged, another could be launched at short notice to rescue the crew. NASA assigned Launch On Need flights separate STS-3xx designations, so the rescue mission for STS-116 was STS-317, STS-117 was STS-318, and so on. There were exceptions (a notable one was the STS-125 Hubble servicing mission, which had STS-400 ready to go if anything went wrong), but the Space Shuttle program should have ended with STS-134.

However, lawmakers and NASA managers opted to make STS-135 the final Space Shuttle mission. There could be no Launch On Need mission waiting in the wings this time around – the Space Shuttle program was being wound down – so the crew would have had to come down from the International Space Station (ISS) aboard Soyuz capsules if Atlantis could not return to Earth safely. There were also only four crew members, a figure not seen since the STS-6 mission of Challenger in 1983.

The crew was commanded by Christopher Ferguson, who would later join Boeing’s Commercial Crew Program and was assigned to (although did not fly) Boeing’s calamity capsule, the Starliner. The pilot for STS-135 was Douglas Hurley, who went on to fly the first crewed test flight of SpaceX’s Crew Dragon in 2020. Rounding out the crew were mission specialists Sandra Magnus and Rex Walheim.

Advertisement

The launch occurred on July 8, 2011, and Atlantis returned from orbit on July 21, bringing the Space Shuttle program to a conclusion.

It wasn’t, however, the end of crewed spaceflight for the US, although the gap that followed was considerably greater than expected or hoped. After the Space Shuttle retired, the US was dependent on Russia for getting its astronauts to and from the ISS. NASA later awarded Commercial Crew contracts to SpaceX and Boeing to restore launches from US soil, but it took SpaceX until 2020 to get the first humans to the outpost, and Boeing until 2024.

The latter’s mission was marked by ignominy due to failures and faults during the mission that meant managers opted to send the capsule back to Earth empty from the ISS and have the Starliner flight test crew return in 2025 aboard a SpaceX vehicle. NASA and Boeing have yet to set a definitive date for when a crew might venture to the ISS once again aboard Starliner.

All of which, 15 years after a Space Shuttle returned from orbit for the last time, has left the US space agency in a bit of a pickle. Instead of depending on the Space Shuttle, the plan was to reduce risk and add redundancy to US capabilities with two providers, but things haven’t worked out that way. To make matters worse, there is uncertainty about how much longer SpaceX will continue to fly the Crew Dragon beyond its contracted missions. The vehicle is reusable, but no more are planned to be manufactured, and SpaceX reckons that each should be good for 15 flights, with some refurbishment.

Advertisement

This should be enough to get through to the end of the ISS program and beyond, but in the longer term an alternative will be required. For SpaceX, this will likely be Starship.

The fate of the Space Shuttles themselves is also not completely set. Atlantis has been staged in a facility at Kennedy Space Center as if in orbit, and the California Science Center has mounted Space Shuttle Endeavour on an external tank and solid rocket boosters, as though ready for launch. The fate of Space Shuttle Discovery is, however, uncertain. Certain lawmakers would very much like to transport the retired orbiter from the Smithsonian’s Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Virginia to Houston, Texas.

For others, well, there’s always a used Orion capsule. ®

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Apple targets WWDC 2027 for smart glasses but is still deciding on the camera question

Published

on

TL;DR

Apple is aiming for a WWDC 2027 smart glasses unveil and is debating whether to include a camera amid the privacy backlash Meta created

Apple is currently aiming to unveil its first smart glasses at next June’s Worldwide Developers Conference, with a consumer release by the end of 2027, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. But the company’s engineering and marketing teams are still wrestling with a question that will define the product: whether its glasses should include a camera at all. The teams developing the device, code-named N50, within Apple’s Vision hardware group see privacy as the top priority, Gurman reported on Saturday.

That caution is a direct response to the backlash Meta created. Meta has sold more than seven million pairs of its Ray-Ban smart glasses, but the product’s camera has become a lightning rod for privacy complaints, with women being secretly filmed in public and Kenyan data workers reporting they were asked to review intimate footage captured by the devices. Apple executives are acutely aware that simply entering the same category risks undermining a privacy reputation the company has spent more than a decade building.

Apple is planning safeguards that go beyond what Meta and Samsung have offered. The company will favour on-device processing, eschew facial recognition, and avoid anything resembling Meta’s proposed “super-sensing” mode, which would continuously analyse a wearer’s surroundings without activating the recording indicator light. Apple also does not plan to follow Meta’s practice of having contractors review footage captured by its glasses, having already dealt with a similar controversy around its Siri voice assistant.

Advertisement

One option Apple executives have debated would include the full camera system but disable photo and video recording entirely, limiting the cameras to feeding visual data into AI tools that identify objects and places. Another prototype eliminates the camera hardware altogether, retaining hands-free Siri access, music playback, and phone calls without any recording capability. Both approaches would sacrifice what has made Meta’s glasses popular: effortless first-person video of holidays, children, and sporting events.

The privacy problem is not theoretical. Apple is entering one of the most important product cycles in its history, with the 20th anniversary iPhone, a second-generation foldable, camera-equipped AirPods, and new Macs all expected in 2027. Courtrooms across New York State have already banned smart glasses, Royal Caribbean has barred them from casinos, restrooms, and children’s areas, and Samsung has called the privacy situation an “industry-shared problem” requiring a collective fix.

The glasses were originally targeted for introduction later this year under the N50 code name, but Apple delayed the timeline partly to refine its privacy message. The company knows from experience that good intentions do not prevent misuse: its AirTags, designed to locate belongings, quickly became associated with stalking. Camera-equipped glasses will inevitably face similar problems, and Apple will likely spend years updating software and working with regulators to address them.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Why businesses are bracing for more volatility in 2026

Published

on

The first half of 2026 has been marked by waves of economic uncertainty. From fuel prices to inflation to market dives, here’s why leaders should stay flexible as they prepare for the uncertain months ahead.

Furthermore, it has been marked by significant economic volatility. Business leaders have had to navigate a uniquely unpredictable market defined by wild swings in gas prices, better-than-expected inflation readings, jumpy consumer behavior and jittery markets.

Close up Crypto trading

Close up crypto trading,Photo by Rafael Minguet Delgado

As leaders look to the months ahead, they are bracing for more volatility. Here’s a quick snapshot of the past six months and a look at how flexibility will define success in the latter half of 2026.

Advertisement

Unpredictable Fuel Prices

In 2025, EY noted that fuel would be a difficult area of the economy to prepare for in the short term. While some market conditions appeared favorable, EY also noted that the global nature of the oil, gas and chemicals sector continued to create uncertainty.

In 2026, that prediction has been proven true more than once. By March, gas prices jumped sharply in reaction to global supply concerns. Crude oil prices rose quickly, pushing prices at the pump from $2.98 per gallon of regular gasoline in late February to $4.08 per gallon on April 2, more than a dollar in just over a month.

Easing tensions in late spring led to a quick drop as supply fears faded. All seemed to be heading back to normal. But by mid-summer, prices were on the rise again as potential oil supply chain disruptions once again became a topic of concern.

While there is no clear indicator of what is to come next, a year ago EY was already saying that companies will face a degree of uncertainty that will be higher than has been seen in several years. This won’t necessarily lead to higher fuel prices and less activity in the latter half of 2026. But it is a distinct possibility, and businesses are clearly bracing for the unknown.

EY added that even in the oil, gas and chemicals sector itself, businesses are looking for ways to manage the uncertainty. Mergers and acquisitions will likely continue, fueled by companies looking for cost advantages that reinforce their ability to survive economic downturns.

Advertisement

Inflation and Markets Aren’t Helping Ease Volatility

While gasoline prices have a trickle-down effect on the global economy, there are other factors that are exacerbating the current state of the economy, as well. Once again, these are a melting pot of good and bad news that is making it increasingly difficult for leaders to predict what comes next.

For example, in June, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) reading dropped by 0.4%. This brought the annual inflation rate down to a less-than-expected 3.5% reading. This was pleasant news for consumers and business owners alike.

Despite the good news, a simultaneous tech sell-off in June hit stocks hard. The tech sector was particularly vulnerable, and in a single day early in the month, the Nasdaq dropped by 4.1%, resulting in the loss of an entire month of gains. The sell-off has continued in fits and starts, and as of this writing, even the much-lauded ticker for an industry-leading space company has dropped below its IPO price within weeks of meteoric initial gains.

Planning in an Unplannable Economy

The one predictable thing in the current economy is that nothing is consistent. Good news and bad news are balanced, pulling markets in different directions and leaving many businesses bracing for more economic volatility in the months to come.

Advertisement

The hardest part of the equation is the fact that few, if any, of these developments are actually resolved. Gas prices, for instance, could continue to rise, limiting consumer spending. But they could also find relief if geopolitical tensions ease again. If that were to happen, it could open opportunities for businesses to take advantage of improved consumer sentiment.

The real factor all business leaders should be investing in isn’t predicting an accurate roadmap for the next few months. Instead, they should be investing in adaptability, resiliency and contingency plans. The more leaders can maintain a degree of flexibility through things like cash savings and flexible decision-making, the more likely they will be to make the most of the months ahead.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Smart glasses distrust will be a a challenge for Apple Glass

Published

on

The eventual launch of Apple Glass is still expected in 2027, but based on how people distrust Meta’s smart glasses, Apple may have a challenge ahead of it.

Smart glasses have been rumored to be in development at Apple for quite a while, and aren’t expected to emerge from Cupertino anytime soon. But, when Apple actually does ship them, it will have to deal with the problem of privacy.

In Sunday’s “Power On” newsletter for Bloomberg, Mark Gurman discusses the privacy implications of smart glasses. Specifically how Apple must work hard to counter the distrust of consumers who are jaded by versions sold by Meta.

Apple will be introducing its first smart glasses at WWDC in 2027, Gurman writes, followed by a consumer release by the end of the year. The summer launch is intended to give developers an opportunity to start building apps before the public gets a chance to buy the hardware.

Advertisement

It’s apparently taken so long to get the glasses ready because Apple is concerned with how it maintains its image of maintaining privacy. Something both the engineering and marketing teams at Apple are working on.

While Apple’s Vision hardware group insists privacy is the top priority, it has to contend with what’s already on the market. When it comes to smart glasses, that means the releases from Meta.

Though Meta does get some credit for being a commercial success when it comes to smart glasses, it’s only part of the story. Meta’s reputation for failing when it comes to privacy protection has become an anchor around its neck.

This has had the result of poisoning the well when it comes to consumers. People are not content with being around people wearing cameras on their head, due to the possibility of being recorded while conducting everyday activities in public.

Advertisement

While the world is used to smartphone cameras being a problem, the stealthy nature makes smart glasses seem worse to consumers. Meta has worked to ally those privacy fears, including using an indicator light that disables recording if it’s been tampered with by the user.

The Apple Way

Apple wants to include similar protections, but it does so with a reputation for privacy to uphold. While it could use the same privacy-forward messaging, Apple is also going to try to distinguish itself from rivals in various ways.

The favoring of on-device processing and avoiding features like facial recognition or Meta’s “super-sensing” mode should help Apple. Add in a pledge not to use the cameras or recordings for AI model training and steering clear of using third-party contractors to review footage could help too.

Apple’s also working on a number of hardware and software-based privacy features, with the glasses in mind.

Advertisement

There’s also the prospect of Apple eliminating the camera element, and instead providing access to AI features, calls, and audio without visual assistance. Apple has apparently already prototyped something similar.

Executives have considered the possibility of including cameras, but just for the AI tools to see the world.

This would be similar to the idea of external cameras on the rumored AirPods Pro, so AI can identify real-world items and mention environmental elements to the user. Not for users to take photographs or videos at all.

Apple has a tough challenge ahead of it in convincing the world that its smart glasses aren’t privacy-destroying devices. At least the company has a year to refine its plan before it needs to brace the users for the release.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

15 Of The Coolest Jaguar Designs Of All Time

Published

on





It isn’t unusual for carmakers to launch new models or even new sub-brands in an attempt to push their lineup upmarket. Relaunching an entire brand to push upmarket is another matter entirely, but that’s exactly what Jaguar is currently in the process of doing. Sales of its existing models were slow, so Jaguar wiped the slate clean and is now replacing its entire lineup with the all-new Type 00 EV.

To say the Type 00 has proved polarizing would be an understatement. Its unusual design attracted a huge wave of criticism, although plenty of people eventually came around to the car’s looks. At the time of writing, it remains to be seen whether or not this unprecedented gamble will pay off, but given the controversy surrounding the design of Jaguar’s new-era electric GT, it seems like a great time to look back at some of the brand’s coolest designs to date.

Advertisement

Jaguar CX-75

About a decade before Jaguar staked its future on large, luxury all-electric GTs, it previewed a car that could have seen the company head down a very different path. The CX-75 is arguably one of the biggest what-ifs in Jaguar’s history, and it has continued to attract plenty of attention from both enthusiasts and collectors even 15 years after its unveiling. The first CX-75 concept car broke cover in 2010, and by 2012, Jaguar had built several fully working prototypes with assistance from Williams Advanced Engineering.

The car was unlike anything Jaguar had built before, with an F1-inspired powertrain and a carbon monocoque chassis. Its 1.6-liter gas engine produced 500 horsepower and it was assisted by electric motors that pushed its top speed to over 200 mph. Jaguar executives greenlit the car for production in 2011, only to backtrack a year later and scrap the project entirely. Speaking to Autocar at the time, brand director Adrian Hallmark blamed the economy, saying that “we feel we could make the car work, but looking at the global austerity measures in place now, it seems the wrong time to launch an £800,000 to £1 million supercar.”

Advertisement

Although it never reached production, the CX-75 did end up featuring in the James Bond movie “Spectre.” Seven replica cars were built for filming, albeit with a 5.0-liter supercharged V8 engine rather than the complex F1-style hybrid system of the planned production car. Former Jaguar chief designer Ian Callum also built a one-off road legal CX-75 from a former stunt car, unveiling it in 2024.

Advertisement

Jaguar E-Type Series I

One of the most commonly repeated pieces of trivia about the Jaguar E-Type is that Enzo Ferrari once called it the most beautiful car in the world. Whether Ferrari actually ever uttered those exact words is debated, since the only surviving accounts of his quote come from people who allegedly overheard them at the 1961 Geneva Auto Show. Either way, Ferrari was clearly impressed with the Jaguar when he first saw it, and it hasn’t lost any of its charm in the intervening decades between then and now.

While the original Series I design is arguably still the most iconic, Jaguar continually tweaked the car over the course of its production. It also boosted the car’s power output to keep it competitive with its ever-changing roster of competitors. The car proved hugely popular with celebrities and collectors when it launched, and it remains that way today. Many high-profile collectors like Jay Leno have their own restored E-Types, and the most pristine examples can fetch more than $200,000 at auction.

Advertisement

Jaguar XJS

Designing a follow-up to an icon like the E-Type was always going to be a difficult task. It didn’t help that the XJS (initially known as the XJ-S) was a different kind of car to its predecessor, focusing more on luxury cruising than traditional sporting prowess. Like many Jaguars since, the XJS also suffered from build quality issues, and it developed a reputation for being especially difficult to maintain and repair.

Its mixed reputation kept prices for used examples low for decades, but in recent years, the XJS has started to gain increasing momentum as a collectors’ car. Prices are up and interest in restomods like the TWR Supercat is high, with V12-engined versions carrying a premium.

In recent decades, V12 engines in general have become increasingly rare, and it certainly helps that the XJS’ looks have aged much better than most of its mechanical components. Less well looked after examples still have a tendency to fall apart and rack up eye-watering repair bills as a result, but when they’re working, few other cars at their price point offer the same combination of power, sophistication, and style.

Advertisement

Jaguar F-Type Project 7

The original F-Type was already a good-looking car, but Jaguar added in some extra design touches from the Le Mans-winning D-Type when it launched the F-Type Project 7. The graphics on the front and side are a tribute to the classic racer, as is its lack of a roof. It does technically come with a removable soft top, but it can only be used at lower speeds. That makes it highly impractical for the wet, windy British weather that usually blankets the country during the winter months, but the Project 7 was never meant for daily use.

Unlike the regular F-Type, the Project 7 was designed more for the track than the road. It was priced like an exclusive track day toy, too, with a retail price of £135,000 at launch, equivalent to around $214,000 at the time. Its 567 horsepower V8 engine wasn’t much more powerful than an F-Type R, but with a production run of just 250 examples, it was far more rare than any other F-Type variant. Arguably, it looked better than all of them too, with its classic racer-inspired design elements being blended with cutting-edge aero and carbon-ceramic brakes.

Advertisement

Jaguar XK120

Alongside the E-Type, the XK120 is one of the most instantly recognizable cars in Jaguar’s history. It was first unveiled in 1948 and takes its name from the XK engine under its hood and its claimed top speed. In the end, it turned out to be even faster than its 120 mph claim, reaching 126.448 mph in testing. That was a record for a production car at the time, and it made what was already a very desirable car even more appealing to buyers.

Jaguar originally intended to build only 200 examples of the car, but it became so popular that more than 12,000 examples were eventually sold. The last example left the factory in 1954, with the car’s replacement, the XK140, debuting shortly after. The XK140 featured heavier bumpers to meet the demands of the U.S. market, as well as a new grille. Although it was a more capable car, it’s arguably not quite as good looking as the original XK120.

Advertisement

Jaguar XKR-S GT

Before the F-Type came along, there was the XK grand tourer. In top-spec XKR-S form, it featured a supercharged V8 engine with around 540 horsepower on tap. It was relatively under-the-radar compared to most of its competition, but still had plenty of appeal to those in the know. To celebrate the end of its production run, Jaguar gave the car a racing-inspired makeover, and the result was the limited-edition XKR-S GT.

It was described by Jaguar at launch as being “the ultimate track‑focused but road‑going iteration of the XK,” with a laundry list of changes compared to the regular XKR-S. The rear wing and additional aero bits were the biggest visual differences, but Jaguar’s engineers also created a bespoke suspension for the car, as well as adding new carbon-ceramic brakes, revised steering, and plenty of other smaller tweaks.

Advertisement

To reduce the car’s weight, Jaguar also removed the car’s rear seats, and swapped the front seats to racing-style bucket seats. One of the few things that wasn’t changed was the supercharged V8, although it sounded even better thanks to the reduced soundproofing in the XKR-S GT. These alterations helped make the car far more expensive than its series-production counterparts, and it was much rarer too. Jaguar built 30 examples for the U.S. market out of a total of 50 cars, and charged around $175,000 for the privilege of owning one.

Advertisement

Jaguar C-Type

Today, Jaguar’s only global-level motorsports team competes in Formula E, but historically, it has been most closely associated with endurance racing. The company won the 24 Hours of Le Mans seven times, making it the fourth most successful brand in the race’s history. Only Ferrari, Audi, and Porsche have more overall wins. The first Le Mans-winning Jaguar was the C-Type, which took the crown in 1951.

The car was designed using a mix of brand new parts and parts borrowed from the XK120. Its engine and transmission both came from the latter, but its bodywork was all-new. Its shape was the work of Malcolm Sayer, a former aircraft designer who, before he was commissioned to work on the C-Type, had just returned from Baghdad University in Iraq. 

According to historian Philip Porter as reported by the BBC, it was during this time teaching in Baghdad that Sayer met a German professor who taught him “a system of designing shapes mathematically” that he’d subsequently employ when designing the C-Type. Sayer later played a key role in designing both the D-Type and E-Type. He reportedly never cared much for the aesthetics of his cars, instead preferring to focus on their aerodynamic efficiency. Nonetheless, the C-Type and its successors are arguably among the best looking cars of their respective eras, as well as being fiercely competitive on track.

Advertisement

Jaguar Mark II

One of Jaguar’s best-known classics is the Mark II, which was produced between 1959 and 1967. Rather than being an all-new car, it was instead a facelift of the brand’s older saloons, which are collectively known today as Mark I models. The Mark II was a significant improvement over its predecessors both in looks and in performance, and it was far more popular with buyers.

It’s still a favorite among collectors who like to regularly drive their cars, because it’s both comfortable and fast by the standards of the era. Decades after its unveiling, in 1993, the Mark II’s design became the subject of an unusual tribute, when Japanese boutique carmaker Mitsuoka borrowed its looks for its Viewt city car. It is, to put it nicely, a bit of a head-scratcher.

Advertisement

Bizarrely, the Viewt was based on the JDM Nissan Micra, and only produced a little over 100 horsepower. That means a well-specified Mark II, particularly one with the 220 horsepower 3.8-liter six-cylinder engine, would still be able to comfortably outpace a Viewt, despite being roughly half a century older than its cheap Japanese imitator.

Advertisement

Jaguar XK180

Long before the CX-75, Jaguar built another forward-thinking prototype that never ended up making it to production. The XK180 was built in 1998 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the XK120, and it took design inspiration from Jaguar’s legendary C-Type and D-Type. The company even used the same panel supplier for the XK180 as it did for its Le Mans-winning race cars. Two prototypes were constructed, with one being right-hand drive and the other being left-hand drive. The left-hand drive prototype was sent off to be showcased in the U.S., while the other stayed in the U.K.

Under the hood of the XK180 was a 4.0-liter supercharged V8 engine, which had been borrowed from the XKR and tweaked to be substantially more powerful. With 450 horsepower on tap, the car had around 70 extra horses compared to Ferrari’s V8 supercar of the era, the F355. It’s not clear how much faster than the Ferrari it would have been, though, since Jaguar never released official performance figures for the car.

Several journalists, including Top Gear’s Jeremy Clarkson, were given the keys to the XK180 to show off its capabilities. Despite its publicity drive, Jaguar never considered the car for production. The XJ220, launched around half a decade before, had proved to be much harder to sell than Jaguar had anticipated. Its poor sales meant there simply wasn’t enough development budget left for the brand to make the XK180 a production reality.

Advertisement

Jaguar XKR (X100)

By the time it reached the end of its production run, the XJS was getting long in the tooth. Its successor, the X100 generation XK, was a much more modern car, with sleek bodywork and a brand-new V8 engine. It first debuted in 1996, and it would take another two years for the faster, more aggressive-looking XKR to arrive in dealerships.

At launch, the XKR made 370 horsepower, but later models pushed that figure up to roughly 400 hp. Alongside its power boost, the XKR also featured various exterior tweaks, as well as larger wheels.

Advertisement

It served as Jaguar’s range-topping performance car — when it worked, of course. Earlier models suffered engine issues thanks to the Nikasil that lined the cylinders, with the engine failing altogether in extreme cases. That patchy reputation has helped keep used prices down compared to many of its rivals from the era.

Advertisement

Jaguar D-Type

Fresh off the glory of two wins at Le Mans with the C-Type, Jaguar engineers developed the follow-up using a similar formula. Much like the C-Type, the D-Type used a revised version of the XK engine that was initially launched in the XK120. It was paired with a lighter chassis and the most aerodynamic bodywork that Jaguar could accommodate, then sent straight back to Le Mans for testing.

The C-Type took its Le Mans wins in 1951 and 1953, with the D-Type’s first win arriving in 1955. It won again in 1956 and 1957, making it even more successful than its predecessor. Further adding to its trophy cabinet, the D-Type also took wins at Spa, Silverstone, and Sebring, among others. Despite being a cutting-edge race car, Jaguar wasn’t choosy about who could own a D-Type. It was available in the brand’s dealerships alongside its other models, and it retailed for a low £1,895, which meant Jaguar took a loss on every D-Type it sold.

Advertisement

Jaguar XE SV Project 8

The regular Jaguar XE is not an especially interesting car. It’s an entry-level luxury sedan that competes against the likes of the BMW 3-Series and Mercedes-Benz C-Class, and it never made much of an impact against its class-leading German rivals. But the XE SV Project 8 is a very different beast.

Jaguar handed an XE to its engineers and instructed them to turn it into a Nordschleife-conquering track car, and so they fitted it with a V8 engine that churned out around 600 horsepower. Then, they stripped out anything that they could to reduce its weight and fitted a motorsport-derived suspension and an all-wheel drive system.

After adding in carbon fiber racing seats, carbon-ceramic brakes, and a huge rear wing, they sent it round the Nordschleife and promptly achieved the lap record for a four-door sedan. The car was put into limited production so that wealthy owners could see what all the fuss was about. In total, just 300 examples were built.

Advertisement

Jaguar XJ220

Jaguar’s XJ220 supercar holds the unusual distinction of both being a ground-breaking world record holder and also not living up to buyers’ expectations. It achieved a Guinness World Record for the fastest production car, hitting 217.1 mph, slightly short of its original 220 mph goal. It’s also rare, with just 282 examples built. That wasn’t a deliberate move on Jaguar’s part though. Originally, the plan was to sell 350 examples, but with such low demand from buyers, Jaguar ended production early.

The lack of demand mostly stemmed from the differences between the XJ220 concept and the production version. The concept featured a 6.2-liter V12 engine, while the production version borrowed a 3.5-liter V6 engine from the MG Metro 6R4 rally car. The concept also included all-wheel drive, active aero, and adjustable suspension, none of which were present in the production version. It was still an incredibly fast and very good-looking car, just not quite as ground-breaking as Jaguar initially promised.

Advertisement

Jaguar XJ13

After proving itself as a force to be reckoned with at Le Mans in the ’50s, it would take Jaguar several decades to once again take the winner’s crown. Its sixth win would arrive courtesy of the XJR-9 in 1988, but in between those two winning eras, Jaguar developed the XJ13.

It was originally intended to mark Jaguar’s return to Le Mans, but it never ended up making it to the start line. Development took longer than initially planned, and Le Mans homologation rules changed during that time. 

Advertisement

Jaguar would have needed to build 50 production cars in order to enter the XJ13, which wasn’t a financially viable option for the cash-strapped company. And anyway, rival carmakers like Porsche and Ferrari had already developed faster race cars in the time between the start of the XJ13’s development and its completion. As a result, the XJ13 was shelved, with only one, stunning prototype ever built.

Advertisement

Jaguar XJR-15

A few years before the XJ220 concept took collectors by storm, the lesser-known XJR-15 supercar was Jaguar’s apex predator. In total, around 50 examples were built, but only 27 were road legal. Unlike the XJ220, the production XJR-15 featured a V12 engine under its sleek bodywork, as well as a cutting-edge carbon fiber chassis.

Confusingly, the Jaguar XJR-15 was not actually built by Jaguar. It was instead built by Jaguar Sport, a subsidiary of Tom Walkinshaw Racing. Walkinshaw wanted a road-legal version of the Le Mans-winning XJR-9, and so set about building one without asking Jaguar first.

Jaguar was quietly developing the XJ220 at the time, but allowed the XJR-15 to go ahead on the basis that it would be used for a racing series. TWR subsequently obliged and created a one-make series specifically for the XJR-15. The roadgoing version was essentially a race car with the bare minimum changes needed to get a license plate, making it one of the most extreme Jaguar-badged cars ever, as well as one of the coolest.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025