Understandably, concerns around online privacy have continued to grow, so it’s no surprise that more and more users are turning to professional data removal services. They want to regain control of their personal information and manage their online presence consciously.
In 2026, Incogni and Kanary are among the most talked-about options, but each comes with a different approach to the task.
This article will walk you through all the relevant differences between Incogni and Kanary so that you can wholeheartedly trust the right provider.
At a Glance: Incogni vs Kanary (2026)
Aspect
Incogni
Kanary
Starting price
From $15.98 (or $7.99/month when billed annually)
From $9.99
Removal model
Fully automated + recurring suppression cycles
Partially automated (tier-dependent)
Coverage
420+ public and private brokers
300+ harmful sites and overall Google exposure
Free option
30-day money-back guarantee
Free plan (limited functionality), 14-day trial for paid plans, 30-day money-back guarantee
Verification
Deloitte Independent Limited Assurance Assessment, industry recognition, reviews by industry authorities
Reviews by industry authorities
Best for
Hands-off, deep, ongoing protection
Visibility & app-based monitoring
Family plans
Yes
Yes
Enterprise option
Yes
Yes
How They Remove Your Data
Incogni: Set-and-Forget Automation
Incogni is architectured to be a hands-off, background protection service.
Once you sign up and verify your identity, Incogni can act on your behalf and start sending removal requests to hundreds of data brokers. However, it doesn’t stop here; itcontinues to monitor the situation, discovering new sources with your data or resending removal requests to brokers that failed to respond.
Advertisement
It’s vital because some brokers refresh their databases and can re-list your data even months later. Incogni’s system stays on its toes, ready to act for you again. Unlimited plans also include unlimited custom removal requests from 2,000+ additional sites.
Moreover, Incogni is available in 34 countries.
For those wondering whether Incogni really works, the answer is yes, but the key is time. Many removals take weeks, sometimes longer; that’s why automation and follow-ups are essential.
Kanary: Guided Removal With Tier Differences
Kanary takes a different approach. It starts by scanning to find where your personal information exists online. Once it confirms exposure, it can generate removal requests and track responses. Many of these are handled automatically, but in certain cases, Kanary asks you to confirm or complete a request.
There are also significant differences across plans:
Advertisement
Free plan: scans, finding, and removing leaks from the top databases, Google’s cache, and social media
Professional plan: Kanary-managed scans of riskiest sites, up to 7 custom requests a week, reports
Advanced plan: customizable
Kanary operates best for US citizens and residents, or if you have a US address.
Coverage Depth
Incogni
Incogni reports coverage of 420+ brokers and 2,000+ sites with the Unlimited plans. These include public people-search websites and private databases not visible on Google, like:
Marketing directories
Recruitment data vendors
Risk and financial data brokers
This broad reach is important as much personal information gets traded across private databases you never see.
Incogni focuses on both visible and hidden data sources.
Kanary
Kanary covers 300+ sites and databases that include top data brokers, Google’s cache, and social media.
Its biggest strength is scanning public listings and searchable exposure. It also monitors some social media and identity exposure risks and can fix weak privacy settings.
Kanary’s coverage is solid for visible data. Only with a customizable Advanced plan do you get features like breach or dark web monitoring.
Advertisement
Credibility & Recognition
Incogni
Incogni has undergone a Deloitte Independent Limited Assurance assessment, which concluded that all its removal processes work as promised. This adds credibility and reassurance in an industry handling sensitive data, especially since such third-party verification is still extremely rare (if not unique) among data removal service providers.
The company has also received Editors’ Choice awards from PCMag and PCWorld, two major tech publications, as well as multiple positive reviews from industry authorities like TechRadarand Cybernews.
Kanary
Kanary has no public third-party assessment like Incogni. However, it has been reviewed positively by major tech publications, such as TechRadar, PCMag, and other platforms writing about online security. These reviews often highlight Kanary’s ease-of-use and clarity.
Kanary also emphasizes transparency in its product design, guiding its users through all the steps.
Advertisement
User Feedback & Reputation
Incogni
Incogni maintains an “Excellent” rating on Trustpilot with 4.4/5 stars based on over 2,000 reviews. Many reviews note successful removals, a very clear dashboard, helpful and efficient customer support, and ongoing data suppression.
There are some users who complain that removals can take time, though it’s normal in the industry, given broker response times.
Overall, feedback confirms that Incogni works – gradually but meaningfully.
Kanary
Kanary doesn’t have an active Trustpilot listing. The only source of user reviews is displayed on Kanary’s website in the form of testimonials in the Kanary Reviews section.
Advertisement
These short opinions highlight positive experiences with exposure monitoring, progress updates, and the straightforwardness of the whole platform. Many users appreciate the visibility offered at every step of the process.
While we don’t undermine these testimonials, it’s important to remember that they are hosted on the company’s own site. They can provide some helpful insight, but don’t offer the same level of reliability found on independent platforms.
Pricing & Value
Incogni
Incogni’s plans start at $7.99/month when billed annually. If billed monthly, it’s $15.98/month. Higher-tier plans add family coverage and priority handling, but all the features needed for continuous, broad protection are already available with the cheapest plan.
There is no free version, but the company offers a 30-day money-back guarantee to provide its users with a risk-free testing period.
Advertisement
Incogni also offers customizable business plans through Ironwall by Incogni.
Kanary
For users on a budget, Kanary offers a free tier with limited features. It may be a good idea if you’re new to this and want to explore exposure monitoring.
Its paid plans start at $9.99/month, regardless of whether you pay annually or monthly.
There’s also a customizable Advanced plan as well as family and enterprise options.
Advertisement
Ease-of-Use & Support
Incogni
Incogni is built for simplicity. Its dashboard is clean, easy to navigate, and mostly hands-off – you can use it to track progress, but it doesn’t require your engagement to work smoothly. Once you verify your identity, most users report that they don’t need to interact with the platform frequently. Reviews also mention that it’s intuitive and straightforward, especially for non-technical people.
Incogni offers multiple contact channels:
Email support – available to all users (responses come within 24 hours)
Live chat – available to all subscribers 24/7
Phone support available to Unlimited subscribers 24/7
Knowledge Base
Customer feedback notes that Incogni’s customer support is responsive, professional, and to the point.
Kanary
Kanary’s platform is all about guided visibility. Its dashboard clearly shows you where your data appears and how risky this exposure is, which helps users understand the situation and what’s being done – many of them appreciate that.
Kanary also offers a mobile app, though the functionalities between it and the website differ. It still is convenient, as it allows you to monitor exposures and removal statuses on the go (if you have such a need).
Advertisement
Kanary’s only support option is email. It promises to have an agent respond within 24 hours. Dedicated support comes solely with the Advanced plan.
Kanary also supports community support with its online forums and the Kanary Discord.
Users note, however, that differences in response times are visible across plan levels.
Strengths & Limitations
Incogni
Strengths
Limitations
Broad broker coverage
No free tier
Full automation
Phone support only available with Unlimited plans
Wide availability
Recurring removal cycles
Independent Deloitte assurance
Industry recognition
Kanary
Strengths
Limitations
Free plan
Narrow automated coverage
Clear visibility of exposures
Higher premium pricing
Mobile app
No third-party verification
Personal privacy advisors with some higher tiers
User engagement required
US users only
Incogni vs Kanary: Which Makes More Sense in 2026?
Both services are legitimate and may be effective when used consistently.
Advertisement
Kanary is well-suited for users who want visibility and control or a free starting option.
Incogni is better for those who need broader coverage, a hands-off system, and ongoing suppression.
When comparing overall, Incogni currently offers the most comprehensive and long-lasting approach. Kanary remains a good option for those on a budget or valuing engagement.
FAQ
Can these services scrub my details from forums or social media?
Advertisement
Kanary specializes in finding visible exposures on niche sites like forums or Twitch chats. Incogni primarily targets commercial data brokers and commercial databases.
Does the removal process require ongoing user interaction?
Incogni is designed for full automation with minimal user input after setup. Kanary is a guided experience that often requires you to manually approve specific removals or verify broker requests.
Advertisement
Are there regional restrictions for these privacy platforms?
Incogni works across North America and Europe. Kanary is almost exclusively focused on US-based users with a US address history.
5G covers under 40% of landmass. This Whitepaper details how 3GPP Release 17 addresses six satellite challenges: delay, Doppler, path loss, polarization, spectrum, and architecture.
What Attendees will Learn
Why non-terrestrial networks are now integral to the 5G roadmap — Understand how the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release 17 incorporates satellite-based connectivity into the 5G system, targeting ubiquitous coverage across maritime, remote, and polar regions where terrestrial networks reach less than 40% of the world’s landmass. Learn the distinction between New Radio non-terrestrial networks for mobile broadband and Internet of Things non-terrestrial networks for low-power machine-type communications.
How satellite constellation design shapes coverage, capacity, and latency — Examine how orbit altitude (low earth orbit, medium earth orbit, geostationary earth orbit), beam footprint geometry, elevation angle, and inclination determine coverage area, round-trip time, and differential delay across user equipment within a single beam. Explore the trade-offs between transparent bent-pipe and regenerative onboard-processing payload architectures.
What radio frequency challenges distinguish satellite links from terrestrial propagation — Explore the six major technical challenges: high free-space path loss, time-variant Doppler, differential delay across large beam footprints, Faraday rotation of polarization through the ionosphere, and spectrum coexistence between terrestrial and non-terrestrial bands in the S-band and L-band.
How 5G protocols must adapt to support non-terrestrial connectivity — Learn the specific amendments to hybrid automatic repeat request operation, timing advance control (split into common and user-equipment-specific components), random access procedure timing extensions, discontinuous reception power saving adaptations, earth-fixed tracking area management, conditional handover mechanisms, and feeder link switching for service continuity in a unique propagation environment.
Gateway Capital Partners, the venture firm founded by Dana Guthrie, announced the first close for its $25 million target Fund II earlier this week, the Milwaukee-based firm told TechCrunch. Gateway Capital declined to share the exact amount of the first close.
The first close means Fund II can begin its investment operations.
Guthrie said the firm began raising its Fund II in the middle of last year. Fund II’s average check size will be between $500,000 and $600,000.
It will be industry-agnostic, she said, though it will have “a bias toward Midwest industries that are ripe for disruption,” such as supply chain and logistics, and manufacturing AI. Guthrie said she hopes to back at least 20 companies from this fund.
Advertisement
Gateway Capital, launched in 2020, last raised a $13 million Fund I in 2020.
Cayin has officially taken the wraps off the N8iii, its next generation flagship digital audio player (DAP), and this time there is enough real information to move past speculation. The timing matters. Astell&Kern continues to dominate the premium tier with refined hardware and software, FiiO has become far more aggressive at the top end, and iBasso keeps pushing output and modular flexibility. Cayin is no longer competing in a niche it helped create. It is now part of a very crowded field where execution matters more than ambition.
Cayin is positioning the N8iii as a limited release with just 500 units worldwide and a suggested retail price of $3,999, placing it squarely in the upper tier of the DAP market and making it clear this is not intended for a broad audience.
A Flagship That Sticks With Tubes
Cayin is continuing with its hybrid tube and solid state approach. The N8iii introduces a Triple Timbre system with Tube Classic, Tube Modern, and Solid State modes. This is less about novelty and more about giving users different tonal options depending on the headphone and music. Cayin has been consistent here. It is one of the few brands willing to deal with the complexity of tube integration in a portable device, even if that comes with tradeoffs in size, heat, and battery life.
Power Output and Amplifier Design
The N8iii offers up to 900 milliwatts single ended and 1285 milliwatts balanced output, which translates to roughly 0.9 watts and 1.285 watts respectively. That is enough power for a wide range of headphones, including many planar magnetics and most dynamic designs in the portable category. It should not have any issue with efficient or moderately demanding full size headphones.
Where things get less certain is with high impedance dynamic headphones. Models in the 300 to 600 ohm range often require voltage swing as much as current, and Cayin has not provided enough detail yet to determine how the N8iii handles that. It is likely usable, but whether it offers full control and headroom is still an open question.
Advertisement
It is also worth stating the obvious. This is not designed for electrostatic headphones. That requires a completely different amplification approach, and Cayin is not trying to solve that problem here.
Cayin includes triple amplifier modes and dual output modes, which gives users some flexibility in how the player behaves, but it also adds complexity that will need to be justified in real world use.
DAC & Platform
Cayin is moving forward with a new flagship AKM DAC architecture, although full details have not been confirmed. That will appeal to listeners who prefer the AKM presentation, especially after several years where ESS dominated the category.
The N8iii runs on a Snapdragon 665 platform with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. That is not cutting edge by smartphone standards, but it is in line with what most high end DAPs are using and should be sufficient for streaming and local playback without performance issues.
Advertisement
Software & Battery
The player uses a customized Android audio system with DTA, allowing SRC bypass for bit perfect playback across supported apps. This is expected at this level and Cayin is in line with the rest of the market here.
Battery capacity is listed at 13,500mAh with PD2.0 fast charging. That is a large battery, which makes sense given the use of tubes and relatively high output power. Actual runtime will depend on how those features are used, and Cayin has not provided estimates yet.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
The Competition
At this price and level, Cayin is up against established competition. Astell&Kern offers more polished industrial design and a mature user experience. FiiO is delivering strong performance with competitive pricing. iBasso continues to push output power and modular flexibility. These are complete products that balance sound quality with usability.
Cayin’s approach remains more specialized. The N8iii focuses on offering a different listening experience rather than trying to be the most practical option.
Advertisement
Cayin N8ii vs N8iii: What’s Actually Changed
Looking at the available data, the jump from the N8ii to the N8iii is not about reinventing the concept. Cayin is refining it, adding flexibility, and pushing output a bit further while trying to clean up some of the practical limitations that came with the earlier design.
The N8ii already established the blueprint. Snapdragon 660 platform, 6GB of RAM, 128GB storage, Android 9, ROHM DACs, and dual Nutube implementation. It was powerful for its time, but it also felt like a device that prioritized experimentation over usability. Battery life hovered around 8 to 11 hours depending on mode, the chassis was thick and heavy at around 442 grams, and while the output was respectable, it was not class leading.
On the output side, the N8ii delivered up to 420mW at 16 ohms from the single ended output in standard mode, and up to 720mW in its higher power setting. Balanced output pushed that further to 760mW standard and up to 1200mW in its higher power mode. That translates to roughly 0.76W to 1.2W balanced depending on how hard you push it. In practical terms, it could handle most headphones reasonably well, but it was not the last word in authority, especially with higher impedance dynamics where voltage swing matters more than raw wattage.
The N8iii moves that forward, but not dramatically. Cayin is now quoting up to 900 milliwatts single ended and 1285 milliwatts balanced output, which translates to roughly 0.9 watts and 1.285 watts respectively. That is enough power for a wide range of headphones, including many planar magnetics and most dynamic designs in the portable category. It should not have any issue with efficient or moderately demanding full size headphones.
Advertisement
Where things remain uncertain is with high impedance dynamic headphones. The increase in output is incremental, not transformative, and Cayin has not provided detailed voltage specs yet. That means headphones in the 300 to 600 ohm range may still be usable, but not necessarily driven to their full potential. And just to be clear, neither the N8ii nor the N8iii is designed for electrostatic headphones, so that remains outside the scope entirely.
The more meaningful change is in flexibility. The N8ii gave you tube or solid state. The N8iii expands that into Triple Timbre with Tube Classic, Tube Modern, and Solid State. That suggests Cayin is focusing more on user tuning and adaptability rather than just raw performance gains. It is a shift toward giving listeners more control over presentation depending on the headphone pairing.
Internally, there is also a shift in direction. The N8ii relied on dual ROHM BD34301 DACs, which offered a certain tonal character that some preferred over ESS implementations. The N8iii is moving to a new flagship AKM architecture, which likely signals a different tuning approach. That is not inherently better or worse, but it does indicate Cayin is responding to market preferences and the return of AKM supply.
Platform and usability are also getting a modest update. The N8iii moves to 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, along with a Snapdragon 665. That is not cutting edge, but it is an improvement and should make the device feel less constrained with modern streaming apps. The inclusion of a customized Android audio system with SRC bypass brings it in line with what competitors have already been doing, rather than pushing ahead.
Battery is another area where Cayin appears to be compensating for its design choices. The N8ii used a 10,000mAh battery rated at 38Wh and delivered between roughly 8 to 11 hours depending on mode. The N8iii increases that to 13,500mAh and adds PD fast charging. That suggests Cayin is trying to offset the power demands of tubes and higher output rather than fundamentally improving efficiency.
Advertisement
The rest of the design philosophy remains consistent. Both devices are heavy, complex, and not particularly concerned with being pocket friendly. Both are built around the idea that a portable device can approximate a desktop listening experience if you are willing to accept the tradeoffs.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
The Bottom Line
The Cayin N8iii builds on what the company has been doing with its flagship line. It keeps the tube hybrid concept, adds more flexibility in tuning, and delivers enough power for most headphones people are likely to use with a portable device. It is not intended to cover every use case. High impedance dynamics may still require more careful matching, and electrostatic headphones are not part of the equation.
At nearly $4,000 USD and with only 500 units available, this is a focused product for a specific audience. The competition is strong and more well rounded than it used to be. Cayin is relying on differentiation and sound tuning to justify its place at the top. Whether that is enough will depend on how it performs outside of the spec sheet.
What the charts from the previous model make clear is how much detail still has not been confirmed for the N8iii. The N8ii offered a very complete set of physical connections including both 3.5mm single ended and 4.4mm balanced headphone outputs, along with matching line outputs on both connections. It also included digital outputs over USB and I2S via a mini HDMI connection, plus coaxial S PDIF. That made it more than just a portable player. It could function as a transport or DAC in a larger system. With the N8iii, Cayin has not yet clarified whether all of those outputs carry over unchanged, or if anything has been added or removed. Given how important that flexibility is to this category, that is not a small omission.
Advertisement
Bluetooth is another area where details matter. The N8ii supported a wide range of codecs including LDAC, UAT, AAC, and SBC, with both transmit and receive capability. That placed it ahead of many competitors at the time, especially with UAT support for higher bandwidth wireless audio. So far, Cayin has not confirmed the codec support for the N8iii. If it remains unchanged, it is still competitive. If it has been updated, that could be a meaningful improvement. If it has been simplified, that would be a step backward. Right now, we simply do not know.
The digital section is where the lack of detail becomes harder to ignore. The N8ii supported PCM up to 32-bit/768kHz and DSD512 over USB and I2S, along with DoP support over coaxial. It could function as a USB DAC across multiple platforms and offered asynchronous USB audio with broad compatibility. Those are not niche features. They are part of what makes a flagship DAP viable as a hub in a desktop or transport based system. Cayin has confirmed a new DAC architecture for the N8iii, but has not yet outlined the full range of supported formats, digital input and output capabilities, or whether its USB DAC functionality has been expanded or refined.
MSRP: $3,999 (launch date not confirmed at en.cayin.cn).
Raspberry Pi 5 price increases. (Credit: Jeff Geerling)
Although easily dismissed by some as another cruel April Fools joke, Raspberry Pi’s announcement of a new 3 GB model of the Raspberry Pi 4 along with (more) price increases for other models was no joke. Courtesy of the ongoing RAMpocalypse, supplies of LPDDR4 and LPDDR5 are massively affected, leading to this new RPi 4 model with two 1.5 GB LPDDR4 chips, as these are apparently cheaper to source.
Affected in this latest price increase across RP’s product range are RPi 4 and 5 models with 4 or more GB of RAM, with price bumps ranging from $25 on the low end to $150 for the Raspberry Pi 500+. If you wanted a Raspberry Pi 5 with 16 GB of RAM, you’re now paying $300 for the privilege.
Obviously, this news has got people like [Jeff Geerling] rather down in the dumps, essentially stating that using SBCs like the RPi is now beyond the means of many hobbyists. While you can still use SBCs that use e.g. LPDDR2 RAM, such as the older RPi Zero, 2 and 3 models, [Jeff] himself is now moving more towards wrangling with snakes on MCUs, as these boards are so far not significantly affected in terms of price.
With current projections in the RAM market being that this year will still see more price increases, it remains hard to tell exactly how ‘temporary’ this situation will be. That said, using readily available, powerful and cheap MCUs like the ESP32 variants for projects isn’t a bad idea if you really don’t need to be running more than perhaps FreeRTOS.
Google has confirmed that its Pixelsnap Charger receives firmware updates automatically and silently while charging a Pixel phone, with the latest release sitting at version 1.51.0.
Pixel owners can verify their charger’s firmware status by navigating to Settings, then Connected devices, and selecting the charger from the list of paired accessories, giving users a straightforward way to confirm whether their unit is running the most current software.
The updates maintain Qi compatibility and keep the charger performing at its intended standard, with Google framing the silent background update process as a hands-off approach that requires no input from the user during normal charging use.
The automatic update mechanism sets the Pixelsnap Charger apart from the vast majority of wireless chargers on the market, where firmware is either fixed at the factory or requires proprietary software and a PC connection to update, a process that most consumers never attempt.
Advertisement
For users without a Pixel device, Google has launched a dedicated web portal at pixel.google.com/pixelsnap that enables manual firmware updates through a different method, plugging the USB-C end of the charger into any Android 16 or newer phone and visiting the page through mobile Chrome rather than a desktop browser.
Advertisement
How to update manually
The manual update process involves selecting the Pixelsnap Charger from a list of compatible devices within the web portal, granting Chrome access to the connected accessory, and following the on-screen instructions to check and install any available firmware releases.
Google updated its Pixelsnap support documentation with these details over the past three months, suggesting the manual update pathway has been available quietly for some time before receiving wider attention from users and third-party publications.
Advertisement
The $39.99 Pixelsnap Charger sits within Google’s broader Pixel accessory ecosystem, and the introduction of a firmware update infrastructure reflects a growing expectation that charging hardware should receive software support in the same way smartphones and smartwatches do.
Users can check whether their charger requires an update at any time through either the Settings menu on a paired Pixel phone or by visiting the dedicated support portal on a compatible Android device.
Everyone’s four favorite anthropomorphic turtles are returning to the world of video games. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Empire City will be released on April 30 for the Meta Quest, Steam VR and Pico. It is made by VR game company Cortopia Studios and will retail for $25. Empire City is a first-person action game that you’ll be able to play solo or co-op with up to four people. And yes, that means all four of the turtles are playable.
We’ve seen a lot of the quartet flexing their fighting form in games over the years, but this is their first time appearing in a standalone VR title. In addition to the shelled heroes, the first part of the new game’s trailer highlights other familiar figures from the series, such as Karai of the Foot Clan and ripped rhino Rocksteady. And of course April is there providing pizza and intel.
schwit1 shares a report from the Kathmandu Post: In Nepal, helicopter rescue on high altitude is, by any measure, a genuine lifesaving operation. At high altitude, where oxygen thins and weather changes without warning, the ability to airlift a stricken trekker to Kathmandu within hours has saved countless lives. But threaded through that legitimate system, exploiting its urgency, its opacity, and its distance from oversight, is one of the most sophisticated insurance fraud networks in the world. Nepal’s fake rescue scam is not new. The Kathmandu Post first exposed it in 2018. Months later, the government convened a fact-finding committee, produced a 700-page report, and announced reforms. In February 2019, The Kathmandu Post published a long investigative report. Last year, Nepal Police’s Central Investigation Bureau reopened the file, and what they found is that the fraud did not stop — instead it was growing.
The mechanics of the fake rescue racket are straightforward: stage a medical emergency, call in a helicopter, check a tourist into a hospital, and file an insurance claim that bears little resemblance to what actually happened. But the sophistication lies in how each link in the chain is compensated, and how difficult it is for a foreign insurer — operating from Australia and the United Kingdom — to verify events that occurred at 3,000 metres in a remote Himalayan valley. The CIB investigation identifies two primary methods for manufacturing an “emergency.” The first involves tourists who simply don’t want to walk back. After completing a demanding trek — an Everest Base Camp trek, for instance, can take up to two weeks on foot — guides offer an alternative: pretend to be sick, and a helicopter will come. The guide handles the rest. The second method is more troubling. At altitudes above 3,000 meters, mild symptoms of altitude sickness are common. Blood oxygen saturation can drop, hands and feet tingle, headaches develop. In most cases, rest, hydration or a gradual descent is all that is needed. But guides and hotel staff, according to the CIB investigation, have been trained to terrify trekkers at precisely this moment. They tell them they are at risk of dying, that only immediate evacuation will save them. In some cases, investigators found that Diamox (Acetazolamide) tablets, used to prevent altitude sickness, were administered alongside excessive water intake to induce the very symptoms that would justify a rescue call.
In at least one case cited in the investigation, baking powder was mixed into food to make tourists physically unwell. Once a “rescue” is called, the financial choreography begins. A single helicopter carries multiple passengers. But separate, full-price invoices are submitted to each passenger’s insurance company, as if each had their own dedicated flight. A $4,000 charter becomes a $12,000 claim. Fake flight manifests and load sheets are fabricated. At the hospital, medical officers prepare discharge summaries using the digital signatures of senior doctors who were never involved in the case. In some cases, these are done without those doctors’ knowledge. Fake admission records are created for tourists who were, in some documented instances, drinking beer in the hospital cafeteria at the time they were supposedly receiving treatment. In one case, an office assistant at Shreedhi Hospital admitted that he had provided his own X-ray report taken about a year ago at a different hospital, to be used as a case for treatment of foreign trekkers to claim insurance. The commission structure that holds the network together was described in detail during police interrogations. Hospitals pay 20 to 25 percent of the insurance payment to trekking companies and a further 20 to 25 percent to helicopter rescue operators in exchange for patient referrals. Trekking guides and their companies benefit from inflated invoices. In some cases, tourists themselves are offered cash incentives to participate.
Looking for the most recent Strands answer? Click here for our daily Strands hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.
Today’s NYT Strands puzzle relies on you having a good knowledge of a certain category of food. Some of the answers are difficult to unscramble, so if you need hints and answers, read on.
If that doesn’t help you, here’s a clue: Not vegetables.
Clue words to unlock in-game hints
Your goal is to find hidden words that fit the puzzle’s theme. If you’re stuck, find any words you can. Every time you find three words of four letters or more, Strands will reveal one of the theme words. These are the words I used to get those hints but any words of four or more letters that you find will work:
These are the answers that tie into the theme. The goal of the puzzle is to find them all, including the spangram, a theme word that reaches from one side of the puzzle to the other. When you have all of them (I originally thought there were always eight but learned that the number can vary), every letter on the board will be used. Here are the nonspangram answers:
ACAI, GUAVA, MANGO, PINEAPPLE, LYCHEE, PAPAYA
Today’s Strands spangram
The completed NYT Strands puzzle for April 3, 2026.
NYT/Screenshot by CNET
Today’s Strands spangram is TROPICALFRUIT. To find it, look for the T that’s five letters down on the far-left vertical row, and wind across, down, over and up.
Sony Interactive Entertainment, owner of the PlayStation brand, has acquired Cinemersive Labs, a UK startup developing tools to convert 2D photos and videos into 3D volumes. The startup team will join Sony’s Visual Computing Group, a research engineering team focused on graphical technology, including game rendering, video coding and generative AI models.
Cinemersive’s most recent product is a virtual reality app called Parallax that works as a viewer for parallax photos — three-dimensional images that you can peer around with natural head movements — captured using traditional smartphones and professional cameras with stereo lenses. The startup developed custom AI tools to convert 2D images into 3D volumes to make Parallax possible, and Sony apparently wants to apply that expertise to its own projects.
“Following the acquisition, the Cinemersive Labs team will join SIE’s Visual Computing Group (VCG) and contribute to our broader efforts in advancing state of the art visual computing within games,” Sony says. “This includes applying machine learning to enhance gameplay visuals, improve rendering techniques, and unlock new levels of visual fidelity for players.”
Machine learning has been a major focus of Sony’s efforts to improve graphical performance on the PlayStation 5 and future hardware. The PlayStation 5 Pro was designed around a new GPU, faster storage and PlayStation Spectral Super Resolution (PSSR), custom AI upscaling tech that let the console run games at a lower resolution and then upscale them to 4K. The company recently squeezed even more performance out of the Pro with an updated version of PSSR it released in March. And with AMD, Sony is working on Project Amethyst, a multi-pronged collaboration to improve ray tracing and upscaling on the future consoles.
Over the years there have been many designs for pan-and-tilt camera mounts suitable for single board computer cameras. Often they mount small servos for the movement, but those in turn present problems when the device finds its way outdoors. [GOAT Industries] is here with a novel solution to this problem, instead of trying to cover up the servos on the mount itself, the whole thing is remotely controlled by linear actuators through Bowden cables.
Testing was performed using Mole-Grips instead of actuators, and revealed a few design quirks. There are hefty springs to provide tension, and since they work against 3D printed assemblies those in turn have to be reinforced. The layout of the Bowden cable run is also important, as it has a bearing on the amount of springinesss in the system. But it provides a versatile pan-and-tilt mount for a Pi camera mounted in an IP-rated box, which is the object of the exercise.
For anyone wishing to build one the files can be found in a GitHub repository, and there’s a video below showing the device in action. Meanwhile it’s by no means the first pan-and-tilt head we’ve seen here at Hackaday, however many others are by necessity much more substantial affairs.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login