TL;DR
Gemini’s Nano Banana image generation, which creates AI images from your Google data, is now free for all eligible US users instead of paid subscribers only.
Today’s best phone cameras are astonishingly capable when it comes to taking pictures. With large sensors, wide apertures and a wealth of extra software features, they can take images that rival what you’d expect from pro-level mirrorless cameras.
I’ve thoroughly tested all of today’s best camera phones, including the iPhone 17 Pro, Galaxy S26 Ultra and Leica Leitzphone in my time as both phone reviewer and professional photographer.
But I still wouldn’t ever want to fully replace my camera with just a phone. I have a few key reasons why.
While cameras have come in all shapes and sizes over the last few decades, they’re designed to be held the same way, with your fingers naturally resting in the same places when pressing the shutter button. They feel like a natural fit and even smaller compact cameras such as the Fujifilm X100VI or my own Leica Q3 43 still allow you to hold them up to take your shot in a typically comfortable way.
Phones aren’t built to be cameras first, so they naturally force a different way of holding them. The big touchscreens mean you have to delicately hold the phone by its edges to avoid accidentally touching something on screen, and with no viewfinder, there’s no option to hold them up to your eye, as you would with most regular cameras.
When holding a phone like a camera, it can feel like you have to be exceptionally delicate with it, especially if you’re quickly shooting one-handed. I often worry I’m going to drop it.
Phones are small and thin (at least compared to most cameras), making it difficult to get a firm grip, and tapping an on-screen button to take a photo always feels awkward. I worry about dropping the phone as I shuffle my fingers around into the right position. Even those phones that offer physical shutter buttons on the edge (or let you use the volume key as a shutter) still feel like you’re holding them in a way they were never truly designed for.
Sure, you can get camera grips or cases that help bulk out the phone to give you something to hold onto and some of those even offer shutter buttons and settings wheels to let you use them like a compact camera. I’ve tried many of them, but none feel as good as holding an actual camera.
Today’s best phone cameras can take truly stunning images. I’ve been blown away by the photos I’ve been able to capture with Xiaomi and Leica’s Leitzphone, especially when using its filmic color profiles. But even this phone — arguably the best camera phone money can buy — doesn’t fully compete with a real camera.
Leica and Xiaomi’s Leitzphone can take some beautiful images, but even so, its quality isn’t on par with an actual Leica camera.
And how can it? While it has a larger image sensor than most phones, it’s still tiny compared to the vast majority of cameras out there. As is its lens. It’s why all smartphone cameras have to rely heavily on software image processing to squeeze every bit of quality they can from their sensors. Some take this way too far with images that can look seriously overprocessed, with heavy-handed sharpening being a common factor in most phones’ quality.
In reality, if you just look at these images on your Instagram feed, you’d probably never realize they were taken on a phone. The often “crunchy”-looking over-sharpened aesthetic a lot of phones produce typically only becomes apparent when you zoom into the fine details. But those signs will still be there, often alongside increased saturation and an over-reliance on HDR techniques to control highlights and shadows.
Pro cameras with larger image sensors and higher-quality lenses can produce far more natural-looking details without an algorithm stepping in.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro uses generative AI to add detail back into its images when taken at over 30x zoom. It’s a neat idea in theory, but I’d rather know that everything in my images is what I actually captured and not what an algorithm thinks should be there.
Speaking of algorithms, I can say with certainty that I don’t want generative AI anywhere near my photos. That’s becoming increasingly difficult to avoid with phone cameras. Google proudly boasted that it uses generative AI to upscale its zoom photos on the Pixel 10 Pro while some of Samsung’s new camera features involve using AI to replace items of clothing on your subject. Apple’s upcoming iOS 27 will even allow you to change the perspective of an image after you’ve taken it, using AI to create an angle that you never actually took in the first place.
Almost all phones offer some kind of AI in their image-taking workflow. Even phones that aren’t actively changing the background or other elements in your images are still using generative tools to upscale your photos to make them look “better.”
The result is that it’s difficult to say that you’ve really taken an image when you don’t know how much of it has been reconstructed by software. Oppo explained that its recent Find X9 Ultra doesn’t use any generative AI when in its Master mode — and honestly, you can tell; shots in its regular mode can certainly look over-processed, especially when it comes to the artificially-lifted shadows. Switching to Master mode (and thereby bypassing all the AI) is the way to get the best-looking shots from this phone. I found the same when using the camera on the Honor Magic 8 Pro.
I didn’t realize the Oppo Find X9 Pro was using generative AI in its telephoto zoom shots, but that’s clearly what’s happening here as it’s tried to artificially recreate the face of the person in the foreground — and it’s not done it well.
Call me a purist, a luddite or a technophobe, but AI has no place in my photography — either at the point of capture or when I’m editing my images later. I want to know that what I captured in my finished shot is what I, the photographer, actually wanted in that frame, not just what an algorithm spat out.
I own and frequently use cameras that are decades old. My Pentax K1000 film camera was released in 1976, while one of my favorite digital cameras — the Sony RX1R — is now 13 years old and still going strong. A phone’s life cycle is much shorter, with even top models receiving security updates for only up to seven years.
This Yashica A was released in the 1950s making it around 70 years old yet I was still able to take some great photos with it.
Once that support period is over, your phone is simply not safe to use and it’s time to upgrade. Sure, the idea is that by then, new technology would be available, so the phone you’d be upgrading to would be even better than your old one. But it still means that the phone camera you’re used to shooting with, which delivers the look and tones you like, simply isn’t going to hang around as long as a regular camera.
That lifespan can really sting, especially as advanced camera phones tend to demand more money — like the £1,700 ($2,245) Leitzphone. Are you better off buying one expensive device that does everything for a shorter period of time, or spending less on a regular phone and also buying a camera that’ll last you much longer? That’s a decision only you can make.
The Pixel 10 Pro has a long software support period of around seven years.
I might be vain here, but as a professional photographer, I simply wouldn’t want to be seen only taking photos on a phone. It doesn’t matter if that phone is the best in the world at taking images; there’s a certain stigma around it that suggests a level of amateurism. I’m not really talking about what it looks like to strangers on the street — if anything, using a phone allows you to blend in and become effectively invisible, which is amazing for things like street photography.
I’m talking about more professional scenarios. If I turned up to a shoot for a commercial client paying me five figures for my images and all I used was a phone, I don’t think I’d ever get work from that client again. I could argue all I want that the quality is good enough, that they’re paying for my expertise and that the end images will still be great but it wouldn’t matter. That client would see the phone and wonder why the hell they’re paying so much for someone to take some snaps on a phone — they could have done that themselves and saved a ton of money in the process.
Some of my shoots involve a lot of gear and setup. If I turned up just with a phone, I’d never get hired again.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t believe that only the best gear can take the best photos — I’ve done commercial shoots using Canon’s cheapest 50mm “nifty fifty” lens and had images taken with that lens licensed for luxury photo books. Most clients care about the images, not the equipment you’re using to get them. But there’s a balance to be struck here and using professional gear suggests that you are a professional. Turning up to a shoot — commercial, wedding, whatever — and pulling out my iPhone for the job isn’t going to do my photography career any favors.
I’ve saved my most important one for last because it’s the biggest stumbling block for me when using a phone as a camera for extended periods. If I’m taking images — whether wandering around a Tuscan village on holiday, taking photos for my YouTube channel or on set for a commercial job — I don’t want distractions that pull me away from the creative mindset I’m trying to maintain.
Using my phone for any purpose already means battling with near-constant incoming notifications from my email, from Slack, WhatsApp, Instagram and many others. It’s a perpetual onslaught of things going on that makes it increasingly difficult to concentrate on the task at hand. Sure, you can turn Do Not Disturb on — and I do — but I also don’t want to miss important phone calls or other messages I might need to act on. So I don’t like switching things off altogether either.
One of the reasons I’ve enjoyed using film cameras recently is that there are absolutely zero distractions so you can focus completely on staying in the moment.
Using a dedicated camera feels like choosing the right tool for the right job. Unlike our phones, it’s not trying to be something else by doing 1,000 other things in the background. My camera doesn’t come with bubble-pop games pre-installed and it’s not vibrating every ten seconds while my friends share memes on our WhatsApp group. Using the camera means shutting off from everything else going on in my life and focusing on the joy of image creation.
I don’t want one device that can do all the things. Sometimes it’s better to have a product that does only one thing but it does that one thing exceptionally well. And just as I don’t want a wrench that’s also a DAB radio and a meat thermometer, I don’t want a camera that’s a games console, an exercise tracker and my portal to social media.
It’s why I — and many other photographers around the world — have also really enjoyed getting into analog film photography recently as it strips out even more of the technology and allows for a more simplistic, arguably more authentic way to take images.
I use my camera increasingly as a way of finding some zen in the chaos of life and not feeling like I’m constantly switched on. It’s why my camera makes me feel more inspired. Picking it up means making an intentional decision to want to go and take photos, not just whipping out my phone to get a quick snap if I happen to see a cute dog. That intentionality invokes a deeper sense of creativity. And more often than not, it results in better, more meaningful photos.
I took this on an iPhone 14 Pro, so I know that phones can take exceptionally good images. I’d just rather use a regular camera for my real photography.
As the adage goes, the best camera is the one you always have with you, but that doesn’t mean it’ll always be the one you can take your best photos with. I love using phone cameras and I’m thrilled that I can have something so capable in my pockets for those occasions where I don’t have my camera with me.
But phones will always be supplementary cameras for me — great for those spur-of-the-moment opportunities or for shooting behind-the-scenes content. And yes, I will sometimes opt to use it on those outings where I don’t want a camera round my neck. But I’ll still always have a regular camera for my work and whether it’s a modern digital or a vintage film camera, it’ll always be the thing I reach for when I want to switch off from the world and truly focus on the joy of taking photos.
Gemini’s Nano Banana image generation, which creates AI images from your Google data, is now free for all eligible US users instead of paid subscribers only.
Google is making Gemini’s personalized AI image generation free for all eligible users in the United States, removing a paywall that had restricted the feature to Plus, Pro, and Ultra subscribers since its launch in April. The expansion, announced on Sunday, lets any US user aged 13 or older generate images informed by their Google account data, while editing capabilities remain limited to users 18 and older. The move opens one of Gemini’s most distinctive features to the app’s broader user base, which reached 900 million monthly active users at Google I/O last month.
The feature is built on Nano Banana, Google’s native image generation model for the Gemini family, and draws on the Personal Intelligence framework that connects Gemini to a user’s Gmail, Google Photos, YouTube, Search, and other first-party apps. In practice, that means users can ask Gemini to generate images that reflect their actual interests and context without spelling everything out in the prompt. Google says connecting apps is opt-in and that the AI does not train on personal data.
Google first added Nano Banana image generation to Personal Intelligence in April, initially rolling it out to paid subscribers in the US before expanding to India and Japan. Making the feature free removes the last barrier between Google’s massive data advantage and the hundreds of millions of Gemini users who were previously limited to text-only personalization. Free-tier users will receive limited quotas before reverting to the original Nano Banana model, according to Google.
The competitive logic is clear. ChatGPT’s image generation has driven significant engagement for OpenAI, and Apple Intelligence is weaving on-device AI across the iPhone ecosystem. Google’s counter is to lean into what no competitor can easily replicate: the depth and breadth of personal data across Gmail, Photos, Drive, Calendar, Maps, Search, and YouTube.
Connecting all of that to a capable image generator creates a personalization advantage that is difficult to match without equivalent data reach. OpenAI and Apple would need to build or acquire comparable cross-product data pipelines to offer anything similar.
The privacy trade-off remains the obvious tension. Europe was excluded from the initial Personal Intelligence rollout and has not been added since, suggesting Google anticipates regulatory friction under GDPR and the AI Act. For users who opt in, a “sources” button shows which personal data informed each generated image.
Dropping the paywall is the latest step in a broader push Google outlined at I/O 2026, where it also announced the Spark autonomous agent, Daily Brief morning digest, and a price cut that brought the Ultra tier from $250 to $100 per month. The pattern is consistent: expand the free tier to grow the user base, then upsell power users on higher quotas and exclusive features. Whether personalized AI image generation proves sticky enough to justify the data access it requires will depend on whether users see value in images that know who they are, or whether the novelty fades once the initial curiosity passes.
For as popular as the piano is in music studios, homes, and schools, it almost defies logic. Compared to a guitar, harmonica, or drum set, pianos are incredibly complex machines that can have somewhere on the order of 8,000 moving parts in a case that can easily weigh hundreds of pounds and which often responds quite poorly to seasonal changes in temperature and humidity. But for putting up with all of these downsides, musicians are rewarded with an instrument that uniquely responds to touch, style, and emotion. A big reason for that is that mechanical complexity, and [Super Valid Designs] is attempting to bring that design to a drum set.
Compared to the complex machinery that connects the movement of a piano’s key to its hammer striking a string, a kick drum pedal is much simpler. It can only bounce off of the drum or get “buried” where the beater remains pressed up against the drum after hitting it. [Super Valid Designs] wanted something with a bit more finesse and control, so he first 3D printed a mechanism that throws the beater towards the drum head and then disconnects it mechanically from the pedal, so that it rebounds even if the pedal stays depressed. The next steps were more difficult, which involved making sure the mechanism reset itself in a repeatable way, without making too much noise of its own. This involved trying out a few different ideas and printing a massive amount of subtly different linkages, but in the end he’s left with a machine that nearly replicates all of the parts of a piano’s escapement,
The end goal of this project wasn’t simply to reproduce piano mechanisms on a drum set, though. [Super Valid Designs] hopes to make a kick drum that’s much smaller than those found in traditional kits, and since smaller drums respond poorly when the beater remains on or near the drum after striking it, a mechanism like this will dramatically improve the performance of the smaller drum and help reduce the requirement for perfect technique. And, maybe in 50 years or so, these types of escapements will take over the drumming world just like the piano escapement took over keyboards after its invention in the 1700s. Some simpler piano actions have been built before, but the complexity seems to be a requirement for all of the tasks they need to do whether its for a piano or a drum.
Chamath Palihapitiya, best known for his venture capital firm Social Capital and the All-In podcast, announced Monday that the AI coding startup he founded raised a sizable Series A.
The company, 8090 Labs, closed a $135 million round led by Salesforce Ventures with participation from Jeffrey Katzenberg’s WndrCo, David Sacks’ Craft Ventures, fellow All-In hosts and “besties” David Friedberg’s The Production Board and Jason Calacanis’ Launch, as well angel investors like Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora and Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo.
Palihapitiya founded 8090 Labs in January 2024 to offer an AI coding agent specifically for corporate programming teams. Its product, Software Factory, helps corporate coders use AI to build production-quality software, not just vibe-coded prototypes, with all the controls enterprises need, such as audit trails, the company promises.
With the raise, Palihapitiya also announced on X that he will lead the startup as CEO, rather than just serving as a board member.
He said the AI rush today feels like the rise of social media in his career as an early exec at Facebook, long before it became Meta. “Since I left Facebook, I was waiting for a moment like this to return to a full-time operating role,” he wrote. “I am convinced that what we are building now is even more important, so there was no decision to make except to be all in.”
Apple is famous for keeping future iPhones under lock and key. This time, however, the leak didn’t come from a case maker or an overenthusiastic tipster. According to Reuters, confidential files linked to the iPhone 18 Pro have surfaced on the dark web following a cyberattack on Tata Electronics, one of Apple’s most important manufacturing partners in India.
Reuters reports that the leaked archive includes supplier lists, internal component maps, engineering documents, and photographs of iPhone 18 Pro units undergoing drop testing. Several of the files reportedly carry Apple’s confidential markings and internal codenames consistent with the iPhone 18 Pro program, though Reuters notes it could not independently verify every document in the archive.

Perhaps even more concerning than the images themselves is the information surrounding them. The leaked documents reportedly map hundreds of individual iPhone components to the companies that manufacture them, revealing details Apple has historically kept closely guarded. Such information could give competitors, counterfeiters, and even suppliers a clearer picture of Apple’s supply chain and sourcing strategy.
The files are believed to be part of a much larger breach claimed by the ransomware group World Leaks, which allegedly published more than 200,000 files stolen from Tata Electronics. Following the incident, Tata tightened access to sensitive internal systems, hired a global cybersecurity consultant to conduct a forensic investigation, and is working with Apple on additional security measures.
The funny thing is that the iPhone 18 Pro photos aren’t really the biggest story here. Apple product leaks happen every year. What’s far more unusual is seeing the company’s supply chain exposed in this level of detail. Apple spends years negotiating supplier relationships and deliberately avoids revealing who makes specific components inside its devices, making that information arguably more valuable than a picture of an unreleased phone.

The breach also comes at a sensitive time for Apple as it continues shifting more iPhone production from China to India, with Tata playing a central role in that strategy. Whether the leaked files ultimately prove authentic or not, the incident is a reminder that in today’s tech industry, protecting the supply chain can be just as important as protecting the product itself.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) says the ShinyHunters extortion group stole only publicly available data, outdated logs, and configuration files after breaching its systems by exploiting a zero-day vulnerability in an Oracle PeopleSoft server.
NAIC is a U.S. insurance regulatory organization present in all 50 states. The organization identified on June 11 that its PeopleSoft system had been accessed by an unauthorized party and discovered that “an unauthorized third party gained access to a portion of our IT systems.”
ShinyHunters claimed the attack and leaked the stolen data after the organization refused to pay a ransom.
NAIC responded to the threat actor’s leak and addressed some of the claims. The organization says that the hackers accessed and, in some cases, stole already publicly available statutory financial reports, credit rating agency data, outdated logs, and configuration information.
According to NAIC, the investigation found no evidence of personally identifiable information (PII) or financial data having been exposed and directly disputed the threat actor’s earlier claims that they compromised critical insurance regulatory platforms like SERFF (System for Electronic Rate and Form Filing), OPTins (Online Premium Tax for Insurance), and SBS (State-Based Systems).
The incident had operational consequences, with credit rating agencies temporarily suspending data feeds and the NAIC pausing investment designation work, but there are significant discrepancies between the hackers’ claims and the organization’s findings.
In an announcement updated on June 25, ShinyHunters claims to hold 3.1 TB of data corresponding to 105,000 files stolen from NAIC’s systems:
The hackers also noted in the update that a previous summary of the stolen data was exaggerated due to using AI hallucinations when evaluating the files.

However, according to the threat actor, the latest published inventory was validated by a human reviewer and should be considered accurate.
NAIC stated that all affected systems have now been remediated and that they are implementing additional defenses to prevent future attacks.
ShinyHunter’s hacking spree using the zero-day (CVE-2026-35273) in the PeopleSoft enterprise system has allegedly impacted more than 100 organizations.
BleepingComputer reported about the threat actor’s zero-day attacks before Oracle disclosed the security issue publicly. Both cloud and on-premises Oracle PeopleSoft customer instances were targeted in breaches that left behind extortion demands signed by ShinyHunters.
The hackers told us that most of the targeted organizations were in the education sector and had been previously extorted by the threat actor.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
![]()
Russian tech giant VK is blaming Apple for cutting online ties with millions of local users. The Moscow-based company recently said its apps were removed from the official App Store for iOS devices without warning.
Read Entire Article
Source link
Summer vacations are coming soon, and you’ll need a good book as a companion
WhatsApp username reservations are now open globally. While you still need a phone number to create an account, usernames let you start conversations without sharing your phone number.
Claiming yours would take less than a minute, but only when you go in with all the details.

Your username must be between 3 and 35 characters and must comply with WhatsApp’s policies. Beyond those limits, you’re mostly free to choose what you like.
WhatsApp has already reserved certain handles for top celebrities, VIPs, and verified organizations, so those names are locked.
If nothing clicks, WhatsApp’s built-in generator can suggest unique handles.

Go to Settings > Account > Username on the latest version of WhatsApp. Thereafter, you can enter your desired username, and the app will tell you whether it is available. The app will also give you suggestions regarding available usernames.
As seen in the screenshot, you can also use your Instagram or Facebook username.
Once you select one, it will be linked to your WhatsApp account and will appear when the feature goes live later this year. If the option isn’t visible, hang tight. WhatsApp is rolling this out region by region and will notify you in the app when it arrives in your country.
When it does, anyone messaging you for the first time won’t see your phone number, as long as you’ve enabled your username. For extra protection, you can also set an optional username key that contacts will need in addition to your handle to message you.

If you change your mind later, WhatsApp will also let you change or remove your username.
WhatsApp usernames follow a pattern set by Signal, which added phone-number-free contact discovery in 2024. Telegram has also had this feature for years.
The addition addresses one of WhatsApp’s longest-standing privacy gaps. Sharing your contact information in the app has always required handing over your phone number, making it harder to maintain separation among personal, professional, and public connections.
Apple’s iOS 26.5.2 update adds a variety of fixes to keep your data safe while browsing the web. Here’s what you need to know and why you should update.
On Monday, just under a month after releasing iOS 26.5.1, Apple made iOS 26.5.2 available for download. The update contains more than 25 different security enhancements, and over 15 of them are related to WebKit.
Notably, Apple patched two WebKit vulnerabilities that used maliciously crafted web content to disclose sensitive information. One of the vulnerabilities, a cross-origin issue, was resolved with improved tracking of security origins, while the other security issue was addressed with validation improvements.
iOS 26.5.2 also prevents sensitive data from being leaked when an iOS user visits a webpage. Apple addressed a permissions issue with additional restrictions. Similarly, Apple has added enhanced checks to prevent malicious websites from processing restricted web content outside the sandbox.
Another now-patched WebKit Storage vulnerability let malicious websites silently hijack clipboard data, affecting the text users were copying and pasting. iOS 26.5.2 resolves this issue through improvements to state management.
Multiple now-resolved WebRTC and WebKit issues allowed maliciously crafted websites to cause unexpected Safari and process crashes, along with memory corruption. All of these vulnerabilities have been addressed with the iOS 26.5.2 update.
Additionally, Apple fixed three kernel-related issues. One of the vulnerabilities, which was addressed with improvements to input sanitization, let apps leak sensitive kernel states. The other two kernel-related issues let apps cause an unexpected system termination and let them write or corrupt kernel memory.
Overall, though, iOS 26.5.2 mostly includes WebKit-related fixes, which will undoubtedly make web browsing safer on an iPhone. Unlike other iOS releases, Monday’s software update doesn’t include fixes for vulnerabilities that were used in targeted attacks.
Even so, AppleInsider recommends installing the iOS 26.5.2 update to ensure your devices have the latest security enhancements. Unlike the iOS 27 developer betas, which may contain bugs, glitches, and performance issues, iOS 26.5.2 is an update that should be installed by all users.
Arena, the AI leaderboard born at UC Berkeley, hit 100 million dollars in annualized revenue eight months after launching its paid evaluation service.
Arena, the crowdsourced AI leaderboard that started as a UC Berkeley research project in 2023, has reached 100 million dollars in annualized revenue just eight months after launching its first commercial product. The platform is best known for letting users compare two anonymous AI model responses side by side and vote on which is better. More than 10 million of those evaluations have now been submitted.
The revenue comes from AI Evaluations, a paid service Arena introduced in September that gives model labs and enterprises detailed performance analytics drawn from its community of users. By December, the service had reached 30 million dollars in annualized revenue. It has more than tripled since then.
There is a caveat in the headline number. While Arena describes the figure as ARR, CEO Anastasios Angelopoulos told TechCrunch that customers pay for consumption, meaning the revenue is not recurring in the traditional SaaS sense. “A lot of people don’t even understand that our business is making any money at all, they still see us as like an open-source project,” he said.
Arena has no direct competitor left standing. Yupp, the only other crowdsourced AI model-picking startup, shut down in March after raising 33 million dollars from a16z crypto’s Chris Dixon. Angelopoulos said Arena competes “for the same dollar” as human labeling companies like Mercor, Surge, and Scale AI, all of which help model makers refine their AI during post-training.
That market is growing fast. Handshake’s annualized revenue from AI training nearly doubled from 550 million dollars in January to nearly one billion dollars by April, according to The Information. Mercor’s annualized revenue also topped one billion dollars earlier this year, though a supply chain breach has since complicated its relationship with key clients including Meta.
Arena was co-founded by Angelopoulos and Wei-Lin Chiang, both postdoctoral researchers at UC Berkeley, along with Ion Stoica, the UC Berkeley professor and Databricks co-founder who advised the project before it incorporated in April 2025. The company raised 150 million dollars in a Series A round in January at a valuation of nearly two billion dollars, bringing its total funding to 250 million dollars from investors including Felicis, Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins, and Lightspeed.
The platform now ranks AI models across text, coding, vision, and image generation, as well as complex agent workflows through a recently introduced Agent Mode. Its leaderboard has become the de facto scorecard for frontier AI models, with labs from OpenAI to Anthropic to Google routinely citing Arena rankings in their own launch announcements. Turning that influence into a 100 million dollar business in under a year suggests that evaluating AI may be nearly as lucrative as building it.
Two goals and an assist by sheer aura: Cristiano Ronaldo just entered the World Cup chat
Weekend Open Thread: Staud – Corporette.com
The House | Manchesterism won’t survive the painful trade-offs unless it gets citizens on board
Potential 2028er World Cup attendee leaderboard
MAJOR BITCOIN & MARKET UPDATE!!!! (MUST WATCH ASAP!!!)
Asia stock markets slide as tech shares slump
A Look At A Gaggle Of Transputer Boards
Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch
Dell (DELL) Shares Tumble Over 5% Following Analyst Downgrade to Hold
Coinbase, Circle Deepen Crypto Stock Losses Despite Resilient S&P 500
Securitize Wraps Roubini's SEC-Registered ETF as Dubai VARA Digital Security
Entergy settles forward sale agreements, raises $672 million in cash proceeds
Kraken's xStocks Opens Bending Spoons IPO Registration to EEA Retail
FIH Pro League: India defeat Pakistan 7-1, register biggest win of campaign | Other Sports News
Russian hackers now target Signal backup recovery keys
Bluekit phishing kit adopts browser-in-the-middle for login theft
Bitcoin Sparks $600M Hourly Liquidations With $65,000 Set To Become Resistance
RTX holders must register wallets before token distribution begins
Hyperliquid Named on Singapore MAS Investor Alert Register
Ripple and SBI launch RLUSD in Japan after JFSA approval
You must be logged in to post a comment Login