In short:Meow Technologies has launched what it describes as the world’s first agentic banking platform, enabling AI agents to open business bank accounts, issue cards, send payments, and manage day-to-day account activity on behalf of users, with no human required to initiate any action.
The platform supports Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Gemini, and other leading AI tools, and is built on a permissioned architecture that prevents agents from moving money unilaterally by default. The announcement marks a significant step in the race among fintech firms to become the default financial infrastructure layer of the emerging agent economy.
The agentic stack reaches financial services
By the spring of 2026, AI agents had gained the ability to write and publish blog posts, manage customer service queues, redesign marketing workflows, and co-ordinate tasks across enterprise software. Banking was the conspicuous exception: every other layer of business operations was being handed to autonomous agents, but financial accounts still required a human to log in, click through dashboards, and authorise transactions.
Meow Technologies, a San Francisco-based fintech founded in 2021, announced on April 8, 2026, that it intends to close that gap. The company launched what it is calling the first agentic banking platform, allowing users to instruct an AI agent in natural language to open a business checking account on their behalf, with the agent then capable of issuing virtual and physical corporate cards, checking balances, sending and receiving payments, and managing invoicing, all without returning to a human for each step.
A user connecting a supported AI tool to Meow’s platform can issue a single natural language prompt, such as “open a business account for my new project”, and have the agent complete the account-opening process, configure settings, and prepare it for use. The platform is integrated with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Gemini, and exposes an MCP endpoint at meow.com/mcp that allows any Model Context Protocol-compatible agent to connect to the banking infrastructure directly. Once an account is open, the agent can issue corporate cards in virtual or physical form, execute transfers to vendors or team members, pull balance and transaction data for audit or reporting purposes, and handle invoicing without requiring the account holder to log into a dashboard. Brandon Arvanaghi, Meow’s chief executive, described the ambition as a fundamental shift in how business banking is consumed.
“Autonomous finance has arrived,” he said. “With Meow, AI agents can handle everything from opening accounts to managing day-to-day activity.” The MCP integration is significant context.The Model Context Protocol had grown to more than 6,400 registered servers by February 2026, establishing itself as the dominant standard for connecting AI agents to external systems and services. By building its own MCP server, Meow positions its banking infrastructure as a native citizen of that ecosystem rather than a bolt-on integration, meaning any agent or development environment that already speaks MCP can reach Meow’s accounts without custom code. The supported tools, Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Gemini, collectively cover most of the agent frameworks in active business use, suggesting that Meow’s addressable market is effectively the full population of businesses already running agentic workflows.
Guardrails and the trust architecture
The central anxiety around agentic finance is obvious: AI agents that can autonomously move money create a novel attack surface, whether through prompt injection, misaligned instructions, or simple error.
Meow has built its permissioning architecture around the principle that agents should operate within the same rule set that governs human employees, and in some respects a stricter one. By default, agents cannot move money unilaterally: every transfer requires the same initiator-and-approver workflow that would govern a human employee in a finance team, and the platform enforces transfer limits, two-factor authentication requirements, and role-based permissions at the infrastructure level rather than relying on the agent to self-police.
Meow’s response to those governance questions is a configurable controls layer that businesses can adapt to their own risk tolerance: an e-commerce company running a high-volume payments workflow can configure higher transfer thresholds and fewer approval steps, while a professional services firm with more conservative treasury policies can require human sign-off above any meaningful sum. Arvanaghi framed the direction of travel as irreversible rather than optional. “We believe banking will rapidly shift away from apps and dashboards toward a seamless, automated experience through AI agents,” he said.
The race for agentic financial rails
Meow is not the only company that has identified AI agents as the next major customer segment for financial infrastructure. Stripe announced a machine payments preview integrating stablecoin settlement for agent-to-agent transactions in early 2026; Mastercard launched its Agent Pay programme in April 2025; PayPal and Google announced a joint Agent Payments Protocol; and Visa is developing tokenisation infrastructure designed specifically for autonomous purchasing. What distinguishes Meow’s announcement is its scope: the platform does not merely allow agents to complete a payment, it allows an agent to create and fully administer a business bank account from scratch.
That is a materially broader set of permissions than any of the card network or major payments platform programmes have offered to date, and it reflects Meow’s positioning as a business banking provider rather than a payments processor. The company was founded in 2021 by a team of former cryptocurrency engineers and launched initially as a corporate treasury platform offering businesses access to high-yield investments and DeFi-adjacent yield products. It has since evolved into a full business banking service, with checking accounts, invoicing, and bill pay, and describes itself as holding over one billion dollars in assets on its platform.
Advertisement
The company has raised approximately 30 million dollars in venture funding from Tiger Global, QED Investors, Lux Capital, Slow Ventures, Coinbase Ventures, and Gemini Frontier Fund. Whether Meow’s “world’s first” claim holds under scrutiny or is quickly overtaken by a larger incumbent is less consequential than the direction the announcement confirms: the agent economy needs financial rails, and the fintech firms that build them earliest will occupy a structurally advantaged position.2025 confirmed AI agents as the next major computing paradigm, and Meow’s April 2026 announcement suggests the financial infrastructure to match that paradigm is now being built in earnest.
Some people love CRTs to a degree that the uninitiated may find obsessive. We all have our thing, and for [Found Tech], it’s absolutely pointing particle accelerators at his face to play video games. He likes modern games, with modern resolutions– none of this 1080p nonsense. Today’s gamers demand 4K! Can a CRT keep up? The answer is a resounding “No, but actually, yes!”
[Found Tech] has an IBM P275 monitor, which is one of the last generation of CRTs. Officially, the resolution maxes out at 1920 dots by 1440 lines. While one might (inaccurately) call that UHD output “2K”, you certainly cannot claim it is 4K. So, what’s the secret? Interlacing. Yes, interlacing, like old analog TV signals.
Apparently, in spite of what the manual says, getting the screen to absorb the 2880×2160 interlaced signal wasn’t the hard part, but generating it was. NVIDIA and AMD graphics cards are absolutely unable to create an interlaced signal, but Intel integrated GPUs are– if you get the right combo of chip and old driver. Sadly, the video doesn’t list exactly what he used. Of course an iGPU isn’t going to give you a very good gaming experience at this high resolution, so [Found Tech] has his games do their rendering on the discrete card before piping that over to the iGPU for display on the CRT.
Technically, you still can’t call the 2880×2160 picture “4K”, as that trademark refers to 2160p at 16:9, and this is both interlaced and 4:3. Still, close enough. In spite of the artifacting that turned us all against interlaced signals back in the day, this apparently has [Found Tech]’s eyes fooled– he says it’s as good as 2160p on his OLED, plus the extra magic that comes with glowing phosphors.
Advertisement
It certainly looks great in a recording, but the monitor in the recording isn’t displayed at a high enough resolution to say for sure if it’s 4K. Still, if you’re into CRT gaming, maybe give this high-res interlacing a try. If you still don’t get what’s so great about CRTs, check here, and remember it could be worse– at least we’re not going on about Plasma TVs.
The Irish Times reported that cuts would begin ‘in the summer’ and could affect a wide array of role types.
Up to 150 Ireland-based jobs are at risk at US software giant Oracle, amounting to a 16pc reduction of its approximately 900-strong Irish workforce.
As first reported by The Irish Times, Oracle is thought to have begun yesterday (29 April) the required statutory period of consultation with impacted staff following delivery of a notice of collective redundancies to the Department of Enterprise.
The Irish Times wrote that the cuts would begin “in the summer” and could affect an array of roles encompassing engineering and technical, sales, consulting, finance, and administration.
Advertisement
SiliconRepublic.com has contacted Oracle for comment regarding this development.
In early March, reports emerged of Oracle’s intention to cut thousands of jobs globally to funnel funds into its major AI data centre expansion efforts. On the last day of the month, employees reportedly began receiving email notice of their redundancies.
Last September, the company revealed plans for its largest-ever restructuring, set to cost up to $1.6bn. At the time, Oracle’s Irish arm sent a collective redundancy notification to the Government.
Oracle, which employs around 162,000 globally, is one of the world’s largest cloud operators, having cemented itself as a leading AI infrastructure provider to major cloud users such as OpenAI.
Advertisement
In March, an analysis from Forrester’s vice-president and principal analyst JP Gownder said: “It’s crucial to distinguish between laying off staff in order to make investments elsewhere – something that has been done since the dawn of capitalism – and AI replacing jobs directly.
“With Oracle, there are financial pressures to lay off staff. The company’s stock has fallen by more than 50pc since Q3 2025. The company is also making a play for future AI-related services revenues.”
Earlier this week, Meta contractor Covalen put around 700 Irish jobs at risk. The company, which employs around 2,500 and has sites in Dublin and Limerick, said it was in consultation in relation to “potential redundancies within its Dublin operations” and was “engaging directly and proactively” to support the affected teams.
Last week, Meta itself announced plans to cut 8,000 jobs, or 10pc of its headcount, as it reportedly seeks to mitigate the costs of heavy AI spending.
Advertisement
Several Big Tech companies have been making layoffs in response to and in accommodation of AI. In recent months, Block has cut 4,000 jobs; Amazon, 30,000; and Atlassian, 10pc of its workforce.
According to the tracking site Layoffs.fyi, around 90,000 tech employees have been laid off in 2026 so far.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
“Nuclear AI startup” Fermi had hoped to build power plants generating 17 gigawatts of electricity, remembers Bloomberg, “three times the amount typically consumed by New York City.”
Hyperscalers could install their data centers on the site itself and tap directly into that power, which would come first from natural gas turbines and later from nuclear reactors. The pitch ticked so many boxes — artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, political connections — that some investors found it irresistible. Fermi went public in October worth more than $19 billion in market value, despite reporting no revenue or signed customers.
Now, the startup’s board has fired its top executive, Toby Neugebauer, after months of negotiations failed to secure a single client. Chief Financial Officer Miles Everson left as well… Fermi’s stock, meanwhile, has tumbled 84% from its peak. The company’s more than 5,000-acre site in the Texas panhandle — dubbed Project Matador, or the President Donald J. Trump Advanced Energy and Intelligence Campus — remains mostly unfinished. And some analysts see a cautionary tale of the market’s AI enthusiasm running ahead of reality, with investors betting on companies whose grand projects may never get built…
The idea of giving data centers their own, dedicated power supply not dependent on the grid may sound tempting, but former US Department of Energy official Jigar Shah said banks don’t want to finance it. The grid, drawing power from many sources, is more reliable than a handful of expensive, on-site plants, he said. He considers Fermi a failure “of monumental proportions” and says similar, off-grid data center projects elsewhere deserve more skepticism than they’ve received… “We’re allowing these types of projects to continue to be viewed as viable when they most certainly are not,” said Shah, who ran the department’s Loan Programs Office during the Biden administration….
Advertisement
“It was a piece of dirt with a dream,” an investor who visited the site in February told the short sellers, Fuzzy Panda Research.
Vibe coding just got a whole lot more adorable. OpenAI introduced AI-generated pets to the Codex app, its agentic tool that helps with coding. These “optional animated companions” don’t do any coding themselves, but serve as a floating overlay that can tell you what Codex is working on, notify you when Codex completes a task or whether it needs your input on something. The new feature lets developers see Codex’s active thread, without having to switch away from your current open app.
Users can type “/pet” in to the Codex app to summon or dismiss the companion. There are eight built-in pets to choose from, but you can also generate your own with the help of AI with the “/hatch” command, like a cute goblin companion. Early adopters have already uploaded a bunch of options and there are even some versions of Microsoft Clippy.
Advertisement
The pets are already available on both Windows and macOS versions of Codex. For a limited time, OpenAI is also offering 30 days of ChatGPT Pro for 10 of their favorite generated companions.
We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.
Ryobi is a consistently high performer when it comes to pairing low prices with high quality. As such, it’s often hard to find great alternatives that match or surpass the lime green option’s value. Users tend to rate Ryobi gear highly, although some performance issues do seem to persist with the brand’s batteries. And digging a little deeper into the market of quality cordless drills, there’s actually a wealth of options that blend great prices with high power output and potent, additional features.
Advertisement
The drill is a basic piece of equipment that no tool user can do without. This must-have home improvement item offers a powered approach to one of the most fundamental tasks you’ll face during renovations, repairs, and beyond. Plenty of toolmakers offer numerous drills in their catalogs, and these seven options are all from high quality brands and have plenty of potency on tap. All of them feature at least one important aspect that surpasses the output of Ryobi’s flagship 18V ONE+ HP Drill/Driver, a tool listed at Ryobi for a favorable $97 for the bare tool or $139 as a kit. It delivers 450 in-lb of maximum torque, a two-speed gearbox with a top speed of 1,700 RPM, and a 2.1-pound weight, with a 24-position clutch. These are all solid features and make for a robust drilling tool, to be sure, but there are some better options out there for users looking to veer in a different direction.
Advertisement
Ridgid 18V Hammer Drill/Driver
The Ridgid 18V Hammer Drill/Driver offers heightened power production and far more robust capabilities in denser material thanks to its hammer action. And yet, the tool is priced like a standard drill. It’s available from Home Depot as a kit, including a 1.5Ah battery and charger for $80 and Amazon in bare tool format for $75. The drill delivers a significant, 800 in-lb of maximum torque, far outpacing many of its direct competitors in the low price category. It’s also 2.8 pounds, making for a relatively lightweight and serviceable tool that won’t drag you down over a lengthy day of use.
The drill offers a 2,100 RPM maximum speed with a variable speed trigger and a 24-position clutch. The tool delivers 3,200 beats per minute when the hammer mode is activated, offering an added depth of power that many other drills in this price range can’t match. The Ryobi model certainly falls short of the power output provided by this Ridgid model while also ringing up at a higher price. While you might find the tool outside of Home Depot, it’s worth noting that the two brands have an exclusivity deal (rather than Ridgid being owned by Home Depot). This means the orange retailer is often going to be the best source of Ridgid gear: Case in point, the Amazon offer is a worse deal, sure, but it also comes in bulk packaging rather than the manufacturer’s box.
Advertisement
Makita 18V LXT Driver-Drill
Makita is known for innovative technology, with upgraded features often found exclusively on the brand’s equipment. The brand’s power tools are widely available, and it makes a substantial range of options in the drilling category.
The 18V LXT Driver-Drill is a frontline power tool operating on Makita’s primary battery system, delivering compact performance with plenty of heft. The tool weighs 3.3 pounds with a battery included, offering a mobile drilling tool that’s easy on the arms and shoulders. It also generates 480 in-lb of maximum torque, eclipsing the output of its Japanese compatriot’s offering. The tool also delivers 1,900 RPM no-load speeds, further surpassing Ryobi’s model.
This drill is adorned with a ratcheting chuck, allowing users to set their bit more firmly in the jaws for a solid lockdown and confident operation. It can be found at Home Depot as a bare tool for $124 and Acme Tools for the same (with an additional 12% off), which is not a better price than the Ryobi solution. However, it’s also available at Amazon for $90, suggesting that a patient buyer who shops around can find an excellent deal on a great power tool.
Advertisement
Craftsman V20 Max Cordless Drill Driver and Impact Driver Set
For many years the Craftsman name carried a legendary tool warranty, and even though things have changed more recently, the brand’s power tools are covered under a three year limited warranty that still delivers plenty of support. The Craftsman V20 Max Cordless Drill Driver is a solid option for buyers seeking a basic DIYer’s support tool. It offers a 2.67-pound weight and 23 clutch positions. The drill delivers a 280 UWO (unit watt out) power rating, which admittedly isn’t very helpful and doesn’t translate to standard torque ratings in any meaningful way. The tool also produces 1,500 RPM maximum rotational speeds. It’s available as a kit solution with a battery and charger from Lowe’s for $99, but this isn’t the best bargain you’ll find for the power tool.
Advertisement
The primary reason for the Craftsman V20 model’s inclusion on this list is because it can be found as a two-tool bundle alongside the V20 Max Impact Driver. This bundle kit is available from Amazon and includes two batteries (rather than one), a charger, and a canvas tool bag. The whole package is priced at $99, adding far more capability to your tool collection for the same price as the single drill kit elsewhere. The impact driver delivers 1,460 in-lb of maximum torque, offering superior driving power when necessary to compliment the drill’s functionality. For this price, it’s hard to beat how much capability you’ll add to your toolbox, making this bundle a solid option for early career DIYers, renters, and others who might be seeking additional bang for their tool buying buck.
Unlike the full sized 18V tools that form Milwaukee’s frontline solutions, the M12 range is incredibly lightweight, and features small tool bodies as a standard, without losing too much power. A wide selection of M12 tools also bear the Fuel moniker that indicates upgraded performance, as well. The M12 Fuel Hammer Drill/Driver is one of those tools, and it delivers plenty to like in a perhaps surprisingly cost effective package.
The tool can be found at Amazon for $104 as a bare tool, placing it slightly above the Ryobi model in price. It’s also available from Home Depot, but retails for $159. It can be found reconditioned for $95 at Factory Authorized Outlet, offering a refurbished model for less than Ryobi’s drill for those willing to go that route. Red Tool Store also sells the drill (new) for $149. The tool itself offers a 6-inch long build, making it one of the smallest drills you might bring into your collection. The tool weighs 2.6 pounds and delivers 400 in-lb of torque and a 1,500 RPM maximum speed.
Size is the primary appealing feature here, but the drill’s output is nothing to sneeze at, even if many of its performance is slightly behind Ryobi’s. The fact that a subcompact option is in the same conversation as a full sized alternative is a feat in itself.
Skil branded tools offer solid performance at a competitive price. There are high-end Skil tools to consider if you need professional-grade precision and performance from your equipment, but numerous Skil tools are also ideal for more moderate needs. A great option is the Skil PWRCore 20V Two-Tool Drill Driver and Impact Driver Combo Kit. The set of power tools is available with a battery and charger from Amazon for $79, making it a massively cost effective choice for renovators on a budget. The drill kit on its own (including a battery and charger) can be found listed at Lowe’s for $109, but it’s currently out of stock and also lacks the added impact driver to sweeten the pot.
Advertisement
The drill offers 450 in-lb of maximum torque, matching the Ryobi drill. It’s 6.06 inches long, and weighs just 1.92 pounds. Combine all that with a maximum speed of 1,800 RPM, and you get a solid drilling option. However, what sets the PWRCore range apart though is its battery technology. The Skil power packs feature the brand’s PWR Jump capability, offering a 25% recharge to a dead battery in just 5 minutes. If you have a few in your arsenal, even a set of spent batteries can be quickly juiced up to deliver enough runtime to allow one power pack to gain a more substantial charge without having to wait.
Advertisement
DeWalt 20V Max Atomic Compact Drill/Driver
Many DeWalt tools are priced a bit higher than other competitors like Ryobi as a result of the tool brand’s premium positioning in the market. Yet, its 20V Max Atomic Compact Drill/Driver breaks the mold, coming in at a price of $99 at Amazon. That’s roughly in line with the Ryobi model, but Amazon’s pricing history checker notes that it’s been listed as low as $74.48 in the last 30 days at time of writing.
DeWalt’s parent company, Stanley Black & Decker, has opted to deliver power ratings for many of its brands in an alternative format, using unit watts out (UWO) instead of the standard inch-pounds of torque and RPM ratings. The Atomic model offers 404 UWO, though the Amazon product page reports a torque rating of 160 in-lb, which may or may not be accurate. The drill is rounded out with a 5.88-inch head length that’s ideal for tighter environments, and at only 2.75 pounds it ought to be easy to hold up for a long time. The drill also offers 15 clutch settings and a 1,650 RPM maximum speed.
DeWalt is known for its high quality gear, and its Atomic series is among some of its highly acclaimed power tools that offer smaller units for more comprehensive coverage of difficult working requirements.
Advertisement
Bauer 20V ½-Inch Drill/Driver
The Bauer 20V ½-Inch Drill/Driver comes from Harbor Freight’s low cost brand offering. The tool is available from Harbor Freight for just $40 as a bare tool, making it definitively the best-priced option on this list. And it’s certainly not the weakest performer by any means. The drill delivers 575 in-lb of maximum torque, far outpacing the Ryobi HP model, while offering 1,900 RPM maximum speeds and a 22-position clutch. The tool weighs 2.7 pounds and measures 8.25 inches, making it a bit heavier and offering less clearance for use in tight spaces. However, for standard drilling tasks this model far outshines its Ryobi competitor.
The tool offers a brushless motor and ratcheting chuck, both of which are typically reserved for more premium tools. It is also available as a kit option from Harbor Freight for $55, bringing a 1.5Ah battery and charger into the equation alongside the tool, though this is listed as an in-store only item for the time being (with no additional note about when it might be available online). Bauer is a low cost tool brand, but it’s a great option for novice users, light duty DIYers, and others. If you plan to really put the drill through its paces, a more premium solution may be warranted.
Advertisement
Methodology
Lazy_bear/Getty Images
All of these drills are priced virtually the same or better than Ryobi’s high output (HP) 18V flagship model, and each one also sports at least one feature that outperforms it. Many of the drills featured offer numerous advantageous points of comparison, usually with the torque rating acting as the first point of superior performance. This makes each one worthy of consideration for a buyer in the market for a new brand or coming to the power tool space fresh, without existing brand and battery ecosystem allegiances.
The heightened performance and low price tags of each drill also make for a notable draw for buyers who may already have one or more tool brands in their arsenal but are seeking a new experience for their next purchase. This is especially true for the supreme cost effectiveness of the Craftsman and Skil options that bundle additional tools into the set for a price that remains on par with Ryobi’s bare tool.
Rewind back to 1961. Pontiac’s V8 program was in full swing thanks to pioneering engine builders like Clayton Leach and Mark Frank, filing patents that laid the foundation for high-performance eight-cylinder engines throughout the next two decades. The Pontiac V8 wasn’t a new concept by this point, having been introduced in 1955 as the 287 cubic-inch Strato-Streak, producing a humble 180 hp. But this year, Pontiac released a new engine attached to its full-size vehicle line-up: the “Trophy V8,” the first 389. Unlike the Strato-Streak, this engine produced a hearty 303 hp in high-compression trim, based on the NASCAR-winning powertrain (hence the name). But the engine was the same physical size as the Strato-Streak, meaning Pontiac could theoretically swap them over into smaller cars.
That idea got Pontiac’s engineers into gear. In the spirit of hot rodders of the day, imagine taking a car with a smaller engine — let’s say the newly redesigned 1963 Tempest, fitted with a 326 (still the same external dimensions as a 389). Why not just put the 389 in it and see what happens at that point? The engineers asked that very question, and we got our answer in 1964 with the birth of the Tempest GTO — and yes, “GTO” stands for something, by the way.
In short, Pontiac’s identical engine block dimensions provided a level of flexibility in engine development that spurred the dawn of the Muscle Era. It allowed not just the manufacturer but the engine builders themselves to effectively select which displacement (thus, horsepower and torque output) would best suit their needs. Moreover, its simple, modular construction improved reliability and likely service turnover. There’s a lot of benefits to break down here, so let’s get into it.
Advertisement
Anatomy of the classic Pontiac V8
Just dance/Shutterstock
First and foremost, let’s discuss what made these engines special. There are several patterns of Pontiac V8, differentiated by era and the size of the main journals on the crankshaft. These are the polished rounded surfaces on the crank that it rotates on within the engine block — in Pontiac’s case, you have small and large main journal types. In either case, both engine configurations retain that same exterior dimension, which is accomplished by modifying the engine’s bore and stroke.
Imagine you have a glass of water with vertical sides, but you want to pour more water in. That means you need a bigger glass, and there are three ways you can do this. You can make the glass wider, taller, or both — the same is true of engines. Making the glass wider is called increasing the engine’s bore, whereas increasing its height modifies the engine’s stroke.
Advertisement
Engineers at Pontiac did both, beginning with the original 1955 287: This had a bore of 3.75 inches and a stroke of 3.25 inches. The largest displacement achieved (from the factory, at least), was the 455, appearing in 1970 with a bore and stroke of approximately 4.15 x 4.21 inches, respectively. In other words, the pistons were almost a half-inch wider and traveled up and down almost an inch farther within the confines of the same engine block. These represented some of the most powerful Pontiacs ever to hit the road, including the SD 455, the various Ram-Air 400s, and the 428 High Output.
Advertisement
The influence of the Pontiac V8 goes beyond engine builders
Kenmo/Getty Images
It’s difficult to understate the impact the original Pontiac GTO had. This was essentially the car that brought the idea of “cheap, little car with a huge engine” into the wider public consciousness. Sure, such vehicles existed before then, but they were generally pricey sports cars like the Corvette or niche enthusiast machines. The GTO’s formula was special because it married this performance to a relatively unassuming body, unintentionally giving rise to the muscle car. And none of this would’ve been possible had the famous Pontiac 389 not been able to fit under the Tempest’s hood.
This sort of setup worked wonders in a number of ways: Take logistics, for example. Whether you’re an engine builder or a parts shop, Pontiac V8s offer an extensive list of interchangeable parts, with many major components being shared between displacements — something that’s not true of small block versus big block designs of other companies. As they all have the same external dimensions, Pontiac’s engines effectively have no such distinctions. This also means they’re much easier to modify, since you could theoretically take any Pontiac engine and turn it into something producing big block torque with the right parts.
Lastly, there’s the level of refinement. All initial engine development is almost invariably plagued by teething issues as things like long-term reliability and manufacturing defects come into play. But Pontiac’s design was generally regarded as highly reliable by the time the big boys like the 389 and 400 debuted. After all, if you want to build a pioneering muscle car, it has to be durable enough to not just blow the doors off its competition but also get you home.
Defense officials have framed the effort as a necessary step to keep pace with both technological change and geopolitical competition. “We are equipping the warfighter with a suite of AI tools to maintain an unfair advantage and achieve absolute decision superiority,” Emil Michael, the undersecretary of defense for research and… Read Entire Article Source link
Cursor AI coding agent deletes production database and backups in nine seconds
Credential mismatch triggered an autonomous, destructive decision inside the Cursor system
Railway API allowed destructive actions without confirmation safeguards
A software company founder watched helplessly as an AI coding agent deleted his entire production database and all associated backups in just nine seconds.
Jer Crane, who runs the automotive SaaS platform PocketOS, said the disaster unfolded when a Cursor agent powered by Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 encountered a credential mismatch.
The agent decided on its own to fix the problem by deleting a Railway volume where the application data lived. “It took 9 seconds,” Crane wrote in a social media post detailing the incident.
Article continues below
Advertisement
Rogue AI agent bypassed multiple safeguards
The Cursor agent searched for an API token to execute the deletion and found one sitting in an unrelated file.
That token had been created for adding and removing custom domains through the Railway CLI, but its permissions were not limited to those specific actions.
Advertisement
Railway’s API allowed destructive actions without any confirmation check, and the platform stored volume-level backups on the same volume as the source data.
Wiping a volume also deleted all backups associated with it, leaving Crane with no immediate recovery option.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
When asked why it proceeded with the deletion, the agent admitted it had guessed instead of verifying and ran a destructive action without being asked.
Advertisement
Crane placed much of the blame on Railway’s architecture rather than solely on the AI agent.
The cloud provider’s API lacks confirmation prompts for destructive actions, stores backups on the same volume as production data, and allows CLI tokens to have blanket permissions across different environments.
Railway is also actively promoting the use of AI coding agents to its customers, creating more opportunities for similar failures.
Advertisement
Crane noted that proper cloud backup systems should store copies in separate locations, not on the same volume where the original data lives.
A reliable backup strategy requires isolation from the source to survive a deletion event like this one.
Recovery and lessons learned
Railway CEO Jake Cooper stepped in and helped restore Crane’s data within an hour.
Advertisement
The company patched the vulnerable endpoint to perform delayed deletions and added further safeguards to its API.
Crane estimates he has spent hours helping customers reconstruct their bookings from Stripe payment histories, calendar integrations, and email confirmations.
He is calling for stricter confirmation prompts, scopable API tokens, proper backup isolation, simple recovery procedures, and proper guardrails around AI agents.
AI tools like Cursor and Claude are powerful, but they are only as safe as the infrastructure they connect to.
Advertisement
A system that allows a nine-second deletion of both production data and its backups is not ready for AI agents that can act without human approval.
Crane’s data was eventually recovered, but the incident exposed how easily an AI agent can destroy data when the underlying platform lacks basic safety features.
Developer Kraken Express introduced Windrose as a survival adventure set in the age of piracy, featuring a procedurally generated world where players can gather, build, and craft alongside the usual piracy activities such as fighting and looting. Released in Early Access in April, the game has since made headlines for… Read Entire Article Source link
Smart changes and improved sound make the JBL Charge 6 the Bluetooth speaker to beat in this area of the market.
Clear, detailed, weighty audio
Long battery life (at the right volume)
Strong Bluetooth performance over long distances
Lossless audio over USB-C
Carry strap
No USB-C cable included
Slightly overrated battery claims
Key Features
Advertisement
Powerbank
Internall battery can charge other devices
Advertisement
IP68
Water- and dust-proof, plus drop-proof
Advertisement
USB-C
Lossless audio via USB-C
Introduction
The JBL Charge 5 was, in common parlance, a banger of a Bluetooth speaker. The Charge 6 builds on that foundation by bringing some needed and useful tweaks to the previous formula.
Advertisement
Longer battery life, a carry handle, and AI-assisted sound are among the round of improvements. The Charge 5 set the benchmark, does the Charge 6 push it further?
Advertisement
Design
Water and dust-proof
Carry strap
USB-C input
Just like the previous versions, the Charge 6 is the speaker in JBL’s outdoor range that most looks like you’d want to play American Football or catch with it. Though at over 1kg of weight, you won’t want it to hit you in the face (or anywhere else for that matter).
Despite the weight gain (1.37kg), the new detachable carry strap makes carrying feel as if it’s lighter. The strap is easy to affix, and once it’s done, you have something less than an American Football and more like a handbag.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The button placement has changed to accommodate the strap, with two rows of controls for the Flip 7’s Auracast feature, power, volume, and playback controls. The USB-A port is gone, with a lone USB-C port included that also supports lossless audio from another source. It’s a shame then that JBL no longer includes a cable with the Charge 6.
The IP rating has shifted from IP67 to IP68, which makes this speaker waterproof and dustproof (it’ll survive submersion at a certain depth for a while). It’s also drop-proof from about a metre, so no need to worry if you’re the member of the party with clumsy hands.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Colours include red, squad, purple, blue, black, pink and white.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Battery Life
24 hours claimed
Fast charging
Acts a powerbank
With both the Grip and the Flip 7, I’ve mentioned that the battery life isn’t as long as expected if you’re playing at 50% volume. Clearly, JBL’s testing is done at lower volumes, but with certain speakers, that means you lose out on some audio performance, too.
I play music from a Spotify playlist (always shuffled) at 50% volume for several hours with each wireless speaker I test. When I did this with the Charge 6, I recorded a 20% drop in battery over two hours. That would suggest the speaker is capable of 10 hours at 50% volume.
But the Charge 6 is bigger than either the Grip or Flip 7, and it can go louder. So dropping the volume down to about 30% (still good for sound) produces better results.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
After seven hours of playing music, the Charge 6 recorded an 11% drop. I’m not going to bother with maths, but that’s a lot better and suggests that 24 hours (JBL’s claimed battery life) is well within reach, and that perhaps the most optimal volume for battery life is in the 40% volume area.
Enable the Playtime Boost and that provides another four hours, according to JBL. The Charge 6 can also perform as a powerbank, though JBL says there’s not enough juice to power a laptop. There’s fast charging support with 10 minutes providing an extra 2.5 hours, and it’s quicker to refuel the tank than it was with the Charge 5, taking three hours from zero to full.
Features
Bluetooth 5.4
Auracast
JBL Portable app
Features isn’t an area where JBL’s Bluetooth speakers pack much of a punch. It’s very simple and to the point.
I’ve mentioned that it can act as a powerbank and can play lossless audio through its USB-C input. The Bluetooth 5.4 connection supports AAC streaming, which is par for the course at this price. The Bluetooth connection is stellar, with no connection issues over long distances.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
There’s Auracast for grouping the Charge 6 with other compatible JBL speakers. There’s the possibility of stereo pairing if you’ve got two to hand.
With the JBL Portable app, you can check the battery life, update the speaker’s firmware, and play around with the sound in the EQ presets and custom options.
Sound Quality
Clearer, more detailed than Charge 5
Weighty bass
Spacious sound
It’s immediate from the off that the Charge 6 has a more powerful sound than the Charge 5. The power has been boosted from 40 to 45W, and at the same volume, you can hear the Charge 6 expel low frequencies with more force.
It’s a bigger sound and JBL has made some smart tweaks. It’s a little clearer through the frequency range and gains a little more in terms of sounding natural. It’s a smooth reproduction of music, so while there are areas for further improvement, when it comes to energy, vocal clarity, low-end performance, and detail, it’s a clear improvement over the Charge 5.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
With the midrange and vocals, there’s more depth, detail, definition and clarity. The Charge 6 is better at separating voices from the rest of the track than the Charge 5, so vocals stand out more.
With Shaka Khan’s Ain’t Nobody, in the second half of the track, the Charge 6 picks out her voice with more clarity and definition than the Charge 5, which sounds a bit more mumbly despite its crisper tone. The vocal clarity of the Charge 6 is excellent, whether dealing with female or male speakers.
Advertisement
It’s more deft in communicating the highs, so although treble isn’t the brightest, compared to the Charge 5 those highs are clearer and more better defined, making the older speaker sound thinner in comparison. There’s a sense that the highs are smoothed out, but it does mean the Charge 6 is less abrasive and fatiguing with the highs.
Bass is weighty, summoning good amounts of energy and depth – it digs deeper than the Charge 5 and sounds clearer. The bass also holds up when playing music outdoors, so while it’s not up to the standards of the Brane X, it performs well.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Advertisement
The Charge 6 also sounds much more controlled than the Charge 5, the sound of which can often spill out into sounding brighter, harsher and thinner by comparison. The Charge 6 pushes out more energy and power, music tracks flow better, there’s more dynamism (though still not much) which makes for a better all-round sound.
The Charge 6 is more articulate, more fluent, more fun than the Charge 5. It’s better at filling a room with sound, better in terms of loudness. It’s not the best-sounding Charge speaker in the range, an honour that goes to the Charge 5 Wi-Fi, but in terms of purely Bluetooth speakers, it’s the best in the series.
Advertisement
That’s not to say there aren’t areas for improvement. Bass could go deeper with some tracks that require more extension, and the highs could stand out more, but these are minor quibbles. If you had the choice of a portable Bluetooth speaker and, say, an indoor Bluetooth speaker like the Bose SoundLink Home to choose from, the JBL wins.
Should you buy it?
You want the best Bluetooth speaker in its field
Yes there’s competition from the likes of Marshall and Bose, and while the gap is closing in some respects, the JBL is still the outright leader.
Advertisement
You need even bigger sound
Advertisement
JBL’s Xtreme and Boombox series offer bigger sound if you’re really looking to make some noise.
Final Thoughts
Small tweaks add up to an improvement over the Charge 5. Like with the Flip 7, JBL has made thoughtful changes to the design and sound, providing more bang for your buck with what’s quite easily one of the best Bluetooth speakers.
Advertisement
The battery lasts for longer (at the right volume), and it’s retained most of the core features such as the powerbank while beefing up its IP rating and adding lossless audio over USB-C. This is a Bluetooth speaker that offers great value and performance, ensuring JBL remains the brand to beat.
Advertisement
How We Test
The JBL Charge 6 was tested over three weeks, compared to the Charge 5 for sound.
Battery drains and Bluetooth connectivity tests were carried out.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login