Meta will begin cutting 8,000 jobs on 20 May while reporting record quarterly revenue of $56.31 billion, as the company raises AI infrastructure spending to as much as $145 billion in 2026. Employee morale has cratered, with internal protests over surveillance software, declining compensation, and the expectation of further layoffs through the autumn.
Meta will begin cutting approximately 8,000 jobs on 20 May, the largest single round of layoffs the company has undertaken since its 2023 restructuring, in a move that lays bare the scale of Mark Zuckerberg’s bet that artificial intelligence infrastructure is worth more than the people it replaces. The company is also cancelling 6,000 open requisitions, bringing the effective headcount reduction to 14,000 positions.
Advertisement
The cuts arrive not during a downturn but during a period of record financial performance. Meta reported first-quarter 2026 revenue of $56.31 billion and net income of $26.8 billion. Full-year 2025 revenue was $201 billion, up 22 per cent year over year, with free cash flow of $43.6 billion. The company is not shrinking because it is struggling. It is shrinking because it has decided that the return on AI infrastructure exceeds the return on human labour, and it is converting one into the other on a scale that no technology company has attempted before.
The financial arithmetic
Meta has raised its 2026 capital expenditure guidance to between $125 billion and $145 billion, up from $72.2 billion in 2025 and $39.2 billion in 2024. Nearly all of the increase is directed at data centres, Nvidia GPUs, custom silicon, and infrastructure to support the company’s Llama model ecosystem and recommendation systems. In the first quarter alone, Meta added $107 billion in new contractual commitments for cloud and infrastructure deals, and it has committed $27 billion to a joint venture with Nebius for a gigawatt-scale AI data centre campus in Louisiana.
Bank of America has estimated that the layoffs could generate $7 billion to $8 billion in annualised savings, a fraction of the capital expenditure plan but a meaningful contribution to the operating margin that CFO Susan Li has pledged to protect. Li told investors during the Q1 earnings call that the company believed a leaner operating model would allow it to move more quickly while helping to offset its infrastructure investments. She also acknowledged that executives “don’t really know what the optimal size of the company will be in the future,” a remarkable admission from a CFO whose company is simultaneously reporting record profits.
The 💜 of EU tech
Advertisement
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
The arithmetic is blunt: Meta is spending more on AI infrastructure in a single year than the combined annual revenue of most Fortune 500 companies, and it is funding part of that spending by eliminating the jobs of people who helped build the business that generates the revenue in the first place.
What is happening inside the company
The financial case for the restructuring is coherent. The human experience of it is considerably less so. Meta’s record quarterly results were reported three weeks before the layoff notifications are scheduled to go out, a sequence that has produced what employees and industry observers have described as a particularly corrosive form of corporate dissonance.
Zuckerberg held a company-wide town hall on 30 April to address the cuts directly. He was explicit about one thing: AI tools were not driving the job losses. “Getting everyone internally to use AI tools and getting to do the work more efficiently is not the thing that’s driving layoffs,” he said. He did not, however, identify what was driving them, and the silence has fuelled anxiety across the company.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Meta has been cutting compensation for the broader workforce while dramatically increasing it for AI researchers. Median total compensation at Meta fell from $417,400 in 2024 to $388,200 in 2025. The stock portion of annual raises was cut by 5 per cent in February 2026, on top of a 10 per cent reduction the previous year. At the same time, Zuckerberg has been personally recruiting AI researchers with compensation packages reportedly reaching $100 million to staff Meta Superintelligence Labs, the division he launched last year under former Scale AI chief executive Alexandr Wang.
The gap between those two realities, shrinking pay for most employees and nine-figure packages for a select few, has produced what multiple reports describe as an atmosphere of resignation. Employees have built at least three countdown websites tracking the days until 20 May, one of which carries the header “Big Beautiful Layoff.” Data from Blind, an anonymous professional network that requires work email verification, shows Meta’s overall employee rating has declined 25 per cent from its peak in the second quarter of 2024, with a 39 per cent drop in its culture rating. In every category other than compensation, Meta now underperforms Amazon, Google, and Netflix.
The surveillance question
Compounding the mood is a programme called the Model Capability Initiative, which Meta deployed on US employees’ work laptops in April. The software captures mouse movements, clicks, keystrokes, and screenshots across a designated set of work applications. Meta has said the data is used to teach AI agents how humans navigate software, not as a general surveillance tool. Employees at several US offices have responded with visible protest, distributing flyers that described the programme as an “Employee Data Extraction Factory” and citing the National Labour Relations Act. Workers have characterised the tool as “dystopian” and created an online petition urging Zuckerberg to shut it down, with some reporting that their work computers have slowed noticeably since the programme was installed.
The objection is not merely about privacy. It is about the implication: Meta is asking its remaining employees to generate the training data that will teach AI systems to replicate the computer-use patterns of the very roles being eliminated. The programme may well be a legitimate research initiative, but its timing, weeks before mass layoffs, has made it impossible for employees to read it as anything other than a preview of their own obsolescence.
Advertisement
The restructuring pattern
Including the May round, Zuckerberg has now overseen the elimination of roughly 33,000 positions since 2022. The 2022 cuts corrected pandemic-era over-hiring. The 2023 round was framed as a “year of efficiency.” Early 2025 cuts were presented as performance management. The January and March 2026 reductions, which removed approximately 1,700 employees from Reality Labs, recruiting, and other divisions, were targeted. The May round is different: it is a company-wide structural reorganisation that touches every major business unit, with teams being reconstituted into AI-focused “pods” under Wang’s Superintelligence Labs division.
More layoffs are expected this year, including a potential round in August and another in the autumn, according to people with knowledge of the plans. Earlier reporting suggested the total reduction could eventually reach 20 per cent of the workforce.
Meta is not alone in converting payroll into AI capital expenditure. Microsoft announced its first-ever voluntary retirement programme the same week, offering buyouts to roughly 7 per cent of its US workforce. Oracle cut an estimated 30,000 employees in March. Amazon eliminated 16,000 corporate roles in the first quarter. Across the technology sector, almost 110,000 jobs have been lost at 137 companies so far in 2026, according to Layoffs.fyi, after roughly 125,000 cuts in all of 2025.
The bet
The theory behind Meta’s restructuring is that a smaller number of highly talented people working alongside powerful AI systems can accomplish what previously required entire departments. Zuckerberg has described the vision as developing AI-powered products that amount to a kind of “personal superintelligence” for billions of users. The Superintelligence Labs division, the AI-focused pods, and the massive infrastructure spending are all oriented toward that goal.
Advertisement
Whether the bet pays off depends on whether the AI systems that Meta is building at a cost of more than $100 billion a year can generate enough incremental revenue, through improved advertising targeting, content recommendations, and new AI-powered products, to justify both the infrastructure spending and the loss of institutional knowledge that comes with eliminating 10 per cent of the workforce in a single month.
The human cost of the technology industry’s AI pivot is not evenly distributed. The roles being eliminated at Meta are concentrated in recruiting, sales, middle management, and non-AI-adjacent product work, areas where the skills gap between what employees currently do and what the company now needs is too wide for incremental retraining to bridge. The roles the company is actively hiring for, at salaries between $62,000 for entry-level positions and $240,000 or more for senior AI research scientists, are almost entirely in machine learning, infrastructure engineering, computer vision, and natural language processing.
Zuckerberg has been through this before. The 2023 efficiency programme, which produced 21,000 job cuts across two waves, was followed by a period of exceptional financial performance that silenced critics and sent the stock to record highs. This time, the market has been less forgiving: Meta’s stock is down roughly 7 per cent year to date, underperforming every megacap peer except Microsoft. The broader pattern across Big Tech in 2026 suggests that investors are rewarding the same playbook at every company that adopts it: cut headcount, redirect the savings to AI infrastructure, and let the stock price validate the decision.
For the 8,000 people receiving notifications this week, the validation will be someone else’s. For Zuckerberg, the question is whether personal superintelligence, a product that does not yet exist, can justify a restructuring whose costs are immediate, measurable, and borne by people who did nothing wrong except work in roles that an algorithm has not yet learned to perform.
Got big binaries? Tired of other version control systems that treat them like inferior files? Lore might be worth a look
Fortnite maker and Apple nemesis Epic Games has decided to git good all on its own with the open-source release of its homemade version control system, dubbed Lore.
The project began life as Unreal Revision Control, and was used by internal teams and as the version control system (VCS) built into Unreal Editor for Fortnite. Now, Epic is ready to share its handiwork with the world.
Advertisement
Lore is a centralized, content-addressed VCS that’s meant to be more flexible for developers, as it’s licensed under the less restrictive MIT License instead of the copyleft requirements inherent in the GNU standard. MIT is generally considered more permissive because, unlike GNU, it doesn’t require derivatives to be licensed in the same way (e.g., a fork of Lore could be proprietary).
Lore can be installed on macOS, Windows, and Linux and its server side is designed to be transportable into different cloud services as well. The biggest difference between Lore and other VCS is its equal treatment of text files – e.g., code – and binaries.
“All content is treated as opaque byte streams on the hot path,” Epic explains in its system design explanation document. “Text-aware features are layered on top, never assumed by the storage or transport paths. Binary content gets the same first-class treatment as text.”
With that in mind, it’s obvious who Epic is targeting with the release: Game developers.
Advertisement
Lore is purpose-built for projects that use large binary files such as games, Epic said, but that doesn’t preclude other use cases with heavy binary loads, like AI model builders, systems developers, and others who work with large amounts of machine-readable data alongside their own code.
We have lots of VCS data, so why do we need Lore?
There are plenty of VCS options out there: Git, Perforce, Mercurial (and its descendent Sapling) are all mentioned by Epic as alternatives that resemble Lore in its design and use. So, why a new VCS? That’s easy, says the Fortnite studio: None of ‘em do it all.
Git, says Epic, has great revision graphing, but treats binaries as “second class citizens” and lacks multi-tenant isolation that ensures users on the same infrastructure can’t access each others work. Perforce requires multiple server round trips to conduct standard operations, making it too slow. Mercurial and Sapling elegantly solve “the scale of source repositories” via their distributed architecture, but again treat text as king and everything else as second-class data.
“The motivation is not that prior systems are bad,” Epic explained. “What Lore offers that the prior art does not is the union” of all those features, and some others too.
Advertisement
Key design goals Epic had in mind when designing Lore included the aforementioned binary-first design, a sparse-by-construction architecture that only downloads necessary fragments from the server to clients to ensure fewer round trips, the elimination of partially-applied revisions, in-between states are invisible to readers, and a full-surface API that allows Lore to work with a variety of programming languages.
If you want to give Lore a spin Epic has published a thorough quickstart guide, and pre-built binaries are available, ironically enough, on GitHub. ®
Swami Sivasubramanian, AWS VP of agentic AI, on stage at AWS re:Invent in December. (Amazon Photo / Noah Berger)
[Editor’s Note: Agents of Transformation is an independent GeekWire series, underwritten by Accenture, exploring the adoption and impact of AI and agents. See coverage of our related event.]
Amazon is legendary for its process of “working backwards.” Start with a customer problem, imagine a future in which it’s solved, draft a press release and FAQs as if it had already happened, obsess over the document until it’s just right, and then go make it a reality.
But sometime last year, it dawned on Swami Sivasubramanian, Amazon Web Services VP of agentic AI, that new coding tools had suddenly made it easier for his teams to develop a demo — actual working software — than to write the classic six-page Amazon “PRFAQ.”
So they began starting with the prototype instead.
If something is “a low-risk bet where we just want to prove our intuition, then I actually say, let’s first go build the demo, and then iterate,” Sivasubramanian said in an interview last week, in advance of his keynote address Wednesday at the AWS New York Summit.
Advertisement
It’s an illustration of how agentic tools are reshaping even the most entrenched workplace practices and traditions. But it’s just one of the ways that the AWS agentic AI team is departing from the company’s established norms, and in some ways returning to its roots.
Inside Amazon, CEO Andy Jassy says he wants the company to run like the world’s largest startup. Sivasubramanian’s division may be the closest thing to what that looks like in practice.
Back to two pizzas
The AWS agentic AI division is organized into dozens of small teams, many of them just large enough to feed with two pizzas. That was the organizing principle that Amazon pioneered in its early days and that much of the company outgrew as it scaled to 1.5 million employees.
When Matt Garman, the CEO of AWS, carved out agentic AI as its own division last year, Sivasubramanian went with small teams on purpose. It matches the new reality of the AI era: projects that once required 30 to 40 people, he said, can now be done by teams of six to eight.
Advertisement
Case in point: the Amazon Quick desktop app, which connects to a user’s email, calendar, Slack, documents, and other apps in a single workspace, and uses AI to search across them, answer questions, and perform tasks. It’s Amazon’s entry in a market where Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI have captured much of the attention.
It traces its roots to late January of this year, when Sivasubramanian said it became clear to him and others on the team that the underlying models had gotten good enough that the main missing ingredient was connecting them to the systems where people actually work.
He pulled together a team of about six engineers to build it. Six weeks later, 200 people inside Amazon were using it. Ten weeks in, it was up to 10,000 internally. The team circled back to write the PRFAQ after the product was already in beta, to help refine their approach to the external launch. They shipped on April 28, three months after they got started.
Under the old system — writing the PRFAQ, routing it through layers of review — the paperwork alone could have taken as long as building and shipping the actual product.
Advertisement
Similar stories are playing out across the division.
One team open-sourced Strands, an AWS software development kit for building AI agents, after a member of Sivasubramanian’s team messaged him at 7 a.m. with the idea. After a quick call with Garman, they decided to go ahead. Within days, it was done.
Kiro, the AI coding tool, was built by a deliberately small team, using Kiro itself to build it. One engineer prototyped a complex cross-platform notification feature for Kiro that had been estimated at four weeks of work, and shipped it in a day and a half.
The internal Amazon team that rebuilt the inference engine for the company’s Bedrock platform for AI models did it with six engineers in 76 days, a project originally expected to take 30 developers 12 to 18 months.
Smaller teams everywhere
What’s happening inside Amazon’s agentic AI division is part of a trend across the tech industry toward smaller teams and flatter organizations, driven by AI and agents.
Microsoft’s 2026 Work Trend Index, a survey of 20,000 workers in 10 countries, found that the biggest factor behind AI’s real impact in the workplace isn’t individual skill but whether the organization has restructured around the new technologies.
Vijaye Raji, OpenAI’s CTO of applications, said during a recent Technology Alliance event that the company’s “ambitions are growing faster than we can hire people” — but the profile of who gets hired is changing. OpenAI increasingly looks for engineers who work with AI tools natively, and the gap between those who do and those who don’t is stark: the top engineers at OpenAI use roughly 100 times more AI tokens than the median.
All of this leads to a natural question: what does this mean for jobs? Amazon has cut roughly 30,000 corporate jobs since late 2025 as part of what Jassy has described as an effort to reduce bureaucracy. He has said he expects AI to shrink the corporate workforce over time.
Advertisement
Similar cuts are playing out across the industry, from Meta to Block to LinkedIn, as companies rethink not only the roles they need to fill but also how many people they need overall.
Bigger goals, same team
Sivasubramanian describes the shift differently: In his division, the same number of people are now pursuing a bigger charter. With the new structure, they’re able to take on more projects, and faster, accomplishing things in weeks that would have taken much longer in the past.
The nature of the roles inside those teams is changing, too. Increasingly, product managers write code, and engineers make product decisions. On the Kiro team, for example, a product manager built the first version of a cost analysis dashboard using Kiro itself.
This also requires leaders to operate differently. For example, Sivasubramanian said he is careful to monitor which decisions need his approval, even when traveling. At the current pace, even four or five days of delay can add as much as 10% to a team’s shipping timeline.
Advertisement
Managing these teams also raises new questions. Sivasubramanian said his division has started tracking how much it spends on AI tokens — the basic unit of interaction with an AI model — the way it would track any other operating cost.
So far, the numbers have been manageable: tools like Kiro invest upfront in defining specs and pulling in the right context before generating code, which makes them more efficient with tokens rather than burning through them in aimless back-and-forth.
Even the heaviest users consume only a few thousand dollars a month, he said. But he expects that over time, companies will need a full picture of their operating expenses that includes not just headcount but the cost of the AI agents working alongside them.
This gets to a bigger point: “The bottleneck is not about the time it takes to build something,” Sivasubramanian said. “The bottleneck is about crafting the right specification and the tests and the right product and customer experience.”
Advertisement
In a blog post published last week, Sivasubramanian wrote that teams across the company that restructured their workflows around AI saw a median 4.5x productivity gain, with some exceeding 10x gains. The teams that simply added AI tools to their existing way of working didn’t see the same results.
Coding and testing
That shift has created its own challenges. Teams can generate code faster than ever, but if they don’t define what success looks like up front — the specs, the tests, the edge cases — the agents don’t have as much chance of success.
Amazon is now pushing testing to the moment of coding rather than handling it in stages, so agents can check their own work before anything reaches production.
Sivasubramanian learned this first-hand, the hard way. Earlier this year, jet-lagged and unable to sleep in his hotel room on a trip to India, he decided to try a fun project: He used Kiro to rebuild a piece of AWS infrastructure he’d originally developed by hand nearly 20 years ago — a replication engine that still underpins core services like S3 and DynamoDB.
Advertisement
He and one of Amazon’s earliest distinguished engineers, Allan Vermeulen, had spent four months on the original. Sivasubramanian figured the agent would make quick work of it. Instead, he spent four nights going back and forth, babysitting each step.
On the fifth night, he realized the problem: he hadn’t given the agent the tools to test its own output. Once he wrote the right spec and set up the testing environment, it was done in about two hours. Asked what he did with his rebuilt version of the engine, Sivasubramanian laughed. He never shipped it. “Maybe I should have,” he said.
With the right team and a couple of pizzas, maybe he still can.
Relativity Space—a rocket maker acquired by former Google executive chair Eric Schmidt last year after stumbling on the path to orbit—might just beat SpaceX to Mars.
On Tuesday, NASA said it hired the company to build a spacecraft to house a suite of scientific instruments, launch it into space, and fly it to Mars.
The structure of the contract is akin to the deals that NASA made with SpaceX to fly cargo to the International Space Station, or Firefly Aerospace to put a lander on the Moon. The government agency handles the science, while the private company provides low-cost infrastructure.
Aeolus, as the mission is dubbed, will contain four instruments to measure and image Mars from orbit, providing what NASA expects to be the first daily, global view of dust, winds, and temperature in its atmosphere. The agency said that data will make it safer for landers and, someday, astronauts, to visit the surface of the Red Planet.
Advertisement
“By pairing NASA’s world‑class instruments with commercial innovation and investment, we can deliver more science, more often, and reduce the time it takes to get essential data into the hands of researchers preparing for future human missions to Mars,” NASA administrator Jared Isaacman said in statement.
The mission is set to launch in 2028—a rapid pace that will require Relativity to design and build the spacecraft to carry the Aeolus instruments, and finish building the rocket that will carry it to space, all on a tight timeline. NASA did not disclose how much it is paying Relativity for the mission, and Relativity did not respond to questions from TechCrunch.
Isaacman, who has flown to space twice on private SpaceX missions, has championed public-private partnerships like this. Under this model, the company working with NASA takes on some of the development cost of the project, in exchange for allowing NASA to stretch its budget further—a structure that has become a template for how the agency funds ambitious missions without bearing all the financial risk itself.
But NASA is taking on risk as well: Relativity is unproven, and there’s no guarantee the mission will even make it off the ground. Past startup partners of NASA have gone bankrupt or seen Moon landers arrive askew. The potential payoff for the company is meant to extend beyond the NASA contract itself, including commercial applications, like launching satellites or delivering cargo to the Moon. Still, the further out into space these partnerships reach, the murkier the market becomes for commercial services.
Advertisement
Relativity was founded in 2015 by two former SpaceX and Blue Origin engineers, with the idea of using 3D printing to its maximum potential as a path to building a cheaper rocket. The company’s first design, Terran-1, launched in March 2023 and failed mid-flight. Relativity doubled down by moving on to a larger design, dubbed the Terran R.
Before Relativity could get it to the launch pad, the company ran into fundraising challenges, and Schmidt took a majority stake in the company in it last year, installing himself as CEO. He’s been tight-lipped about the investment but has expressed interest in orbital data centers, and is thought to be using Relativity to launch a space telescope, Lazuili, financed by his family philanthropy, Schmidt Sciences.
The former tech executive’s decision to take over a space company last year puzzled some observers because rocketry is a crowded and capital-intensive field. But pent up demand for new rockets—fueled by delays at Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin—could still lead to a payoff for Schmidt if Terran R can actually make it to space.
And the new contract might give Schmidt a chance to put one over on Elon Musk, a regular sparring partner of his on the issue of AI safety. While Musk has long talked of his Martian ambitions, SpaceX has never actually sent its own mission to Mars (no, the Tesla he launched into space in 2018 missed).
Advertisement
If Relativity’s Aeolus launches on schedule, it could be the first private mission to reach the Red Planet.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
Oukitel WP66: 30-second review
.Oukitel seems to have a particular strategy in the rugged phone market that involves launching lots of products, presumably on the assumption that a percentage of them will find favour with some customers.
The WP66 is at the end of a long list of recent phones, which includes devices I’ve covered, like the WP61 Plus, WP60 and WP30 Pro. Typically, these devices are affordable, rugged designs which avoid the latest SoC technology but often have some core features that make them attractive.
Advertisement
On paper, the WP66 isn’t much of a step away from its WP61 Plus predecessor, using the same MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC, identical memory and storage sizes, However, the WP66 has roughly half the battery capacity, and that makes it much easier to use as a daily driver.
With this level of practicality baked in, this is probably Oukitel’s most design-aware rugged phone yet. It trades brute bulk for a slimmer profile and adds a neat 1.81-inch secondary display that does real work. The 11,000mAh battery is the headline number, and it delivers genuinely exceptional runtime. The Dimensity 7025 is capable enough for daily tasks, but it is not a performance chip.
Camera quality is fine in good light and ordinary in other conditions. At under $450 from the makers, this is a competitive proposition for anyone who needs genuine ruggedness without the usual aesthetic punishment.
Advertisement
It’s mostly the SoC that stops this from being one of the best rugged phones we’ve seen this year.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Oukitel WP66: price and availability
How much does it cost? $450/£337/€390
When is it out? Available now
Where can you get it? Direct from the maker or via an online retailer
Oukitel is one of those phone makers that likes to discount its phones at launch and sets a huge MSRP that the device is never sold at. Doing that in Europe isn’t legal, but it’s something Chinese phone makers don’t appear concerned about.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Advertisement
It’s available in the US via Oukitel’s official site, where the MSRP for the WP66 is $639.99 – but at the time of review, it’s down to $450. On Oukitel’s UK site, it retailss for £474.99, while currently being discounted to £287.99.
Considering the specifications and features of this phone, the price seems competitive enough, but how they came up with the MSRP values is a mystery.
The phone most likely to be compared is the Doogee S200, as it also has a rear display. The Doogee phone typically sells for $360/£285/€328 via AliExpress. But the processor in it is less powerful, it has half the storage and can’t do 4K video. However, it has twice the battery capacity if you need longer runtime.
Given the recent price increases for both RAM and storage, the Oukitel WP66 is probably priced right, but maybe in the next six months, it needs to get a little cheaper to cope with phones with more concurrent technology being released into the busy mid-tier market.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Oukitel WP66: Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Item
Spec
CPU:
Advertisement
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Octa-core, up to 2.5GHz)
GPU:
IMG BXM-8-256 (PowerVR IMG GPU)
NPU:
Advertisement
MediaTek NPU 550
RAM:
12GB
Storage:
Advertisement
512GB
Screen:
6.6″ IPS TFT 750 nits and 1.8” rear screen
Resolution:
Advertisement
1080 x 2408 (FHD+)
SIM:
2x Nano SIM, or 1x Nano +TF
Weight:
Advertisement
365g
Dimensions:
172.2 x 81.0 x 15.8mm
Rugged Spec:
Advertisement
IP68 IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min), MIL-STD-810H Certification
11,000 mAh battery (Max 33W charge wired, 7.5W Reverse)
Colours:
Advertisement
Orange, Black
Oukitel WP66: Design
Slim for a rugged phone
No wireless charging
Rear display
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
The WP66 that Oukitel sent was the orange model, and I think this version looks much more interesting than the one with a black colour scheme.
One oddity I noticed almost immediately is that on the rear of the case is a GT logo, and this also appears on the maker’s webpage. But this phone isn’t the WP66 GT; it’s just the WP66, which suggests a change of plan in the naming scheme before launch.
Advertisement
Another chin-scratcher is that this phone has holes in the bottom-right corner for a lanyard, but there isn’t one in the box. It also comes with a TPU bumper that has a slot for the same purpose.
I’m glad about the bumper, because if it weren’t attached, the camera cluster would be excessively prominent, with each of the three elements sticking out at least 2mm. The included bumper guaranteed that this phone doesn’t have wireless charging, and to confirm that, I removed it and tested for wireless functionality. That’s a shame, because below the camera and rear display, the underside of the WP66 is extremely flat.
What I liked was that WP66 bucks the rugged phone aesthetic in a meaningful way. Most rugged devices lean into aggressive styling: heavy frames, pronounced corner armour, and military-surplus colour palettes. The WP66 is comparatively restrained. The Orange colourway is vibrant rather than utilitarian, and the Black variant suits a professional context.
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
At 15.8mm thick, this is slim territory for a phone carrying an 11,000mAh battery. The trade-off is visible: the bezels around the main display are wider than a mainstream consumer phone would accept in 2026. The screen-to-body ratio sits at roughly 75%. For a rugged device, that is acceptable. For anyone accustomed to modern frameless designs, it might feel dated.
Advertisement
The secondary display on the rear panel is the most distinctive design element. It sits cleanly within the casing and gives the phone a dual-screen character that most rivals lack entirely.
Oukitel has packed the rear display with functionality, showing you a calendar, battery status, messages, and a million other things. My only issue with it is that by the time you’ve scrolled through all the functions to find the one you want, you could have easily turned the phone over and gone directly to that information three or four times over.
The button layout is by-the-numbers, and the designer has resisted the temptation to add extra buttons when they’re not specifically required. The right side has the power button with integrated fingerprint reader and volume controls, and the left has a single user-definable button and the SIM card slot. The card slot supports a MicroSD card and a Nano SIM, or you can forgo the MicroSD card and use a second Nano SIM. As this phone comes with 512GB of storage, not having a MicroSD card isn’t that limiting.
Overall, for a business user who might want a rugged phone for site visits or other outdoor work, the WP66 is pleasantly restrained, and it’s not so big and heavy that it couldn’t be used as a daily driver.
Advertisement
Design score: 4/5
Oukitel WP66: Hardware
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
512GB of storage
11000 mAh battery
In other reviews, I’ve talked about the current MediaTek strategy that involves taking older technology and rebranding it with relatively small changes to make it look current.
What they can’t paper over is that the Dimensity 7025 is a 6nm SoC, because its origins are the Dimensity 930, an SoC that first appeared in 2022.
Oukitel used this in the WP300, WP60 and WP55 Pro, so this will be the fourth design to use the same platform.
Advertisement
My view of this silicon is that the CPU is workable, but the PowerVR IMG BXM-8-256 GPU is a poor GPU that struggles with the OpenGL and Vulkan APIs.
What challenges the GPU in this phone design is that the display is 1080 by 2408 pixels, whereas in the WP60, as an example, it only had a 720 x 1560 pixel screen.
If you like to game or use more demanding 3D titles, this probably isn’t the platform for you, but for everyday use, it works well enough to navigate Android.
What many people might consider a high point of this design is the 512GB of storage, which is enough when combined with the 12GB of RAM to handle plenty of applications and the data that comes with them. This SoC doesn’t have an NPU; instead, it has an APU, which is the CPU and GPU merged to perform a similar function. Thankfully, most AI done from phones is cloud-based anyway.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
One interesting change from its predecessor is that the battery is now rated at 11,000mAh, where the WP58 Pro and WP60 had 10,000mAh. That’s not a huge increase, but it might take you 10% further depending on how you use it.
While the makers did source a larger-capacity battery, they didn’t find one that charged any faster or delivered more power to other phones.
It’s got the same 33W wired charge and 7.5W reverse-charging specs as the 10000mAh devices, which translates to a full recharge from flat in under two hours.
Like most of the Oukitel designs I’ve seen in the past two years, the WP66 doesn’t represent cutting-edge technology. It’s assembled from a collection of parts that are chosen based entirely on price, and that create an ensemble of functions that can attract customers at the right cost.
Advertisement
Oukitel aren’t the only Chinese rugged phone maker using the same approach or with a selection of middle-of-the-road devices that use older technology, but there aren’t any huge surprises here for those willing to do their research about this brand.
This is a similar camera arrangement to the WP61 Plus, with the primary sensor being the excellent Samsung S5KHM6, supported by a less-than-epic 2MP macro camera from GalaxyCore. What’s missing, and was on the WP61 Plus, is a night vision sensor.
The primary sensor can produce some top-notch results in bright lighting, ideally outdoors, but it’s not as impressive when there is less light. But the worst aspect of this design is the 2MP macro camera, a camera that produces results from the dawn of cameras on phones.
It’s grainy, difficult to get the optimal focus and often not worth the effort.
What’s also crushingly disappointing is that even with a 108MP sensor and 512GB of storage to handle some big recordings, this phone doesn’t offer 4K video. The best it can manage is 2K video at 30fps, which, considering the capabilities of the ISOCELL S5KHM6, is pitiful.
Advertisement
Also, like all the Oukitel phones I’ve tried recently, this phone doesn’t support Widevine L1, so streaming services are often reduced to 480p resolution.
You can take good pictures with this phone, but it takes more effort than it should.
Oukitel WP66 Camera samples
Image 1 of 15
Advertisement
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
(Image credit: Mark Pickavance)
Oukitel WP66: Performance
6nm SoC
Mid-tier performance
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Phone
Oukitel WP66
Oukitel WP61 Plus
SoC
Advertisement
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
GPU
Advertisement
IMG BXM-8-256
IMG BXM-8-256
NPU
Advertisement
MediaTek’s APU 780
MediaTek’s APU 780
Memory
Advertisement
12GB/512GB
12GB/512GB
Weight
Advertisement
365g
656g
Battery
Advertisement
11000
20000
Geekbench
Advertisement
Single
897
959
Advertisement
Multi
2296
2362
Advertisement
OpenCL
156
failed
Advertisement
Vulkan
137
failed
PCMark
Advertisement
3.0 Score
10912
13080
Advertisement
Battery
27h 27m (20%)
32h 7m + 25%
Charge 30
Advertisement
%
33
28
Passmark
Advertisement
Score
6691
6620
Advertisement
CPU
5391
5284
3DMark
Advertisement
Slingshot OGL
3592
3741
Advertisement
Slingshot Ex. OGL
2549
3738
Advertisement
Slingshot Ex. Vulkan
2490
2614
Row 19 – Cell 0
Wildlife
Advertisement
1447
Failed
Row 20 – Cell 0
Nomad Lite
131
Advertisement
Failed
Even if initially, this looks like a pointless comparison, since both phones use the same SoC, there is some interesting data in these tests to examine. For most benchmarks, the difference between the two is within the standard deviation.
But it’s interesting to note that now running Android 16, the WP66 can run Wildlife and Nomad Lite, where the WP61 Plus, which was also running the same OS, could not. The obvious conclusion is that the WP61 Plus launched with some issues that may have been resolved, or that UL has tweaked 3DMark to make it more forgiving.
This isn’t to say that the WP66 runs either of the benchmarks well, but at least it pops out a number. It also succeeds on GeekBench for OpenGL and Vulkan, where it previously failed on the WP61 Plus, but the numbers are still horrible. The IMG BXM-8-256 isn’t a GPU anyone would want if they got a choice.
Advertisement
What I found most fascinating about these results was the battery performance, with the WP61 Plus running longer than the WP66. That’s not much of a revelation given the relative battery capacities, but it is worth noting that the WP61 Plus lasts only 17% longer despite having nearly twice the battery capacity.
This makes little sense, since they use a practically identical platform, and if I still had the WP61 Plus, I’d be curious to see what it was when running that used up the battery. It would be guesswork to pin this on any aspect of that phone, but it does suggest that the WP66 may be in a better place at launch than its predecessor.
Looking at these numbers overall, neither of these phones is ideal for gaming or VR, since the GPU can’t offer the range of features that more modern silicon can.
Battery life is decent, but everything else is bordering on an entry-level performance envelope.
Advertisement
(Image credit: Oukitel)
Oukitel WP66: Final verdict
The Oukitel WP66 is the rugged phone that does not punish you for choosing durability. The slim profile, the secondary display, and the extraordinary battery life form a compelling package. The Dimensity 7025 processor is an honest mid-range device that does support 5G, but isn’t a gaming platform.
The camera is capable in daylight and ordinary in poor light. The 33W charging rate is the one frustrating limitation in an otherwise well-considered design. At the launch price of $450, this is one of the more interesting propositions in the mid-market rugged segment.
With Oukitel having so many phones in the WP series, the company’s shotgun approach aims to make a handset that’s perfect for most customers. The WP66 is aimed at those who want a rugged phone without impractical size or weight. It manages that, and it even shows off a little with its rear-facing display.
Advertisement
I’m just not convinced that with such relatively old technology on the SoC, there is much longevity to be had. There are similarly priced rugged phones with better cameras and newer silicon for those who can spot them. The WP66 has a platform on its fourth outing for Oukitel, and that might be one or two bites of that cherry more than the Dimensity 7025 deserves.
Should I buy a Oukitel WP66?
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Oukitel WP66 Score Card
Attributes
Notes
Advertisement
Rating
Value
No an excessive price for the spec
4/5
Advertisement
Design
Slim for a rugged phone; secondary display is a standout touch
4/5
Hardware
Advertisement
The fourth time Oukitel used this SoC
3.5/5
Camera
Good 108MP primary camera sensor, poor Macro, but only 2K video
Advertisement
3.5/5
Performance
Dimensity 7025 handles daily use; not a gaming chip
Latest Interpol review shows how scams continue to dominate, and AI-enabled attackers prove too hot to handle for cash-strapped regions
Cybercrime now accounts for more than 30 percent of all offenses across the Asia and South Pacific (ASP) region, according to the latest figures from Interpol.
The international cop shop said on Wednesday that the region has seen “a dramatic increase” in the number of recorded cybercrimes, driven largely by an uptake of digital infrastructure, new technologies, and the increasingly organized nature of criminal networks.
Advertisement
Interpol’s latest ASP Cyberthreat Assessment Report states that online scams and phishing attacks dominate cybercrime in the region. Data taken from 2024-2025 shows that phishing campaigns have matured beyond the spray-and-pray mass emails of yesteryear and now resemble the more sophisticated techniques deployed elsewhere in the world.
Targeted spear phishing is more common nowadays, and the growing use of AI helps even low-skilled script kiddies to apply a layer of authenticity to their attacks.
The region’s problem with organized scamming gangs that run camps where hundreds of people are compelled to commit crimes is especially pronounced and well-documented.
A United Nations report published last year described scam call centers across Southeast Asia as an epidemic that is metastasizing across the region “like a cancer.”
Advertisement
These compounds can be found across countries such as Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and the Philippines, and often see vulnerable individuals trafficked into the scam centers to work under poor conditions – or even as slaves.
Interpol cited Singaporean research, which estimated the regional scam industry generates close to $40 billion each year.
AI tools, especially those capable of generating convincing deepfake imagery, have also proven popular with cybercriminals across ASP, just as they have beyond the region.
In 2024, the same scam compounds were found using deepfake imagery to support romance scams.
Advertisement
In February 2024, an employee at a multinational business in Hong Kong was duped into authorizing a $25 million payment because the faces of company execs were convincingly deepfaked on a video call.
A similar case was also reported in Singapore in March 2025, when a finance director at a different multinational was tricked into transferring more than $499 million following a Zoom call in which fraudsters assumed the identities of company chiefs, including the CEO and CFO.
Interpol’s report highlights how cyber threats are evolving into large-scale challenges for multiple jurisdictions, and no longer represent relatively uncommon, isolated incidents.
Sumary of offenses
Infostealers and banking trojans represent the second most-pervasive cybercrimes across ASP behind scams. Affecting individuals and organizations, infostealer infections often lead to large-scale frauds and ransomware distribution.
Advertisement
Speaking of which, ransomware came in just behind infostealers. Interpol described it as “a significant regional threat” that is leading to “significant financial losses.”
Attackers are adopting common tactics such as double extortion and using them to target critical infrastructure, healthcare, and large enterprises.
More than 135,000 ransomware attacks were recorded in 2024, and ransomware was also deployed in 51 percent of all data breach cases.
While digitization across the region is growing, opening new economic opportunities for these countries, law enforcement agencies are struggling to keep pace with the increase in cybercrime. Many lack the skills and tools needed to investigate these crimes.
Advertisement
The issue is especially pronounced in developing countries and small island states in the Pacific, which face “significant resource and capacity constraints,” and are thus more vulnerable to direct targeting in attacks by criminals who have a greater chance of evading consequences.
Neal Jetton, cybercrime director at Interpol, said: “The findings in this report highlight a rapidly evolving cyber threat landscape across Asia and the South Pacific, where cybercriminals are leveraging artificial intelligence, ransomware-as-a-service models, and sophisticated social engineering techniques on an industrial scale.
“As digital adoption accelerates across the region, strengthening operational cooperation, information sharing, and cyber resilience remains essential to protecting communities and critical infrastructure.”
Some improvement
Interpol lauded many jurisdictions and governments within the ASP region for their proactive approaches to countering cybercrime growth.
Advertisement
Hong Kong and the Republic of Korea are two areas that have made strides by introducing new cybersecurity legislation, while others have established national task forces, codified national action plans, and launched awareness campaigns.
But even in more developed countries globally, and those with more mature cybersecurity regulatory and legislative landscapes, the issue of increasing rates of cybercrime persists.
While Interpol does not collect cybercrime figures for other regions, such as Europe and North America, in the same way that it does for ASP, it’s easy to see that problems persist everywhere.
The UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) publishes crime rates by type across England and Wales each year, and while computer misuse offenses in 2025 decreased by 58 percent compared to 2017’s figures, there were still an estimated 735,000 cases across the year.
Advertisement
Expanding the data to look beyond pure cyber offenses to cyber-supported crimes, such as banking and credit fraud, these offenses account for more than 2.7 million of the circa 9.6 million total crimes committed.
The FBI in the US produces its annual IC3 report examining the rates of cybercrime across the country.
Although it doesn’t compare it to total offenses or other crime types, the latest report reflecting 2025’s figures showed cybercrime reports topped one million for the first time, and total losses reached a record $20.87 billion. ®
A Mac can update an iPad using the same iPadOS software Apple delivers through Software Update. Here’s how Finder can help recover failed installs, fix update problems, and restore devices that won’t start properly.
Updating an iPad via macOS
Updating your iPad directly through Settings remains the easiest way to keep the device current. Apple can automatically download and install new software overnight while the iPad is charging and connected to Wi-Fi if Automatic Updates is enabled. The seamless background process handles everything for the vast majority of users. But sometimes an update refuses to install or leaves the iPad stuck on a recovery screen. Finder offers a reliable recovery path when these software failures occur. Apple built this utility to manually install iPadOS when the on-device update process fails. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
When high school students step into a cybersecurity internship, they enter a field where the stakes are real. The tools, threats and responsibilities extend well beyond the classroom. In rural communities, such opportunities can be transformative — for both learners and the regions working to build a future-ready workforce.
In eastern Alabama, cybersecurity pathways are creating new opportunities for collaboration between educators and employers, reflecting a broader lesson: Workforce development is more impactful when industry helps shape learning early. As cybersecurity threats grow more complex, many employers say preparing future talent does not begin at the point of hiring — it starts earlier, through partnerships connecting classrooms, credentials and real-world experience.
For district leaders and career and technical education (CTE) directors designing career-connected learning, these partnerships can help align instruction with workforce realities while expanding students’ access to high-demand careers.
Credentials matter, but they only tell part of the story. What really prepares students for cybersecurity work is exposure — seeing how systems operate in the real world and understanding the responsibility that comes with protecting them.— Scott Ross
Advertisement
Industry as a Co-Designer
Cybersecurity is a field that depends on industry insights. The tools and threats defining the work often evolve faster than traditional curriculum cycles, and employers see firsthand how quickly skill requirements change.
Scott Ross, director of information technology at HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, has seen how quickly the field changes throughout his career. While professional credentials such as Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) can signal readiness, Ross points to internships and applied experience as equally critical.
“Credentials matter, but they only tell part of the story,” Ross said. “What really prepares students for cybersecurity work is exposure — seeing how systems operate in the real world and understanding the responsibility that comes with protecting them.”
That perspective shapes HudsonAlpha’s engagement with regional education partners. As cybersecurity roles expand across sectors, from defense and healthcare to biotechnology and agriculture, employers are increasingly invested in helping students understand the range of opportunities available and the expectations that come with them.
Advertisement
How a regional alliance is opening doors to cybersecurity careers
A Regional Effort Takes Shape
In eastern Alabama, those connections are coordinated through the East Alabama Regional Cybersecurity Alliance (EARCA), a collaboration among K-12 districts, postsecondary institutions and industry partners focused on growing local cybersecurity talent. Rather than operating in isolation, schools and employers are aligning around shared goals: relevant curriculum, meaningful credentials and work-based learning opportunities tied to workforce needs.
Ross sees this regional approach as essential. “Cybersecurity isn’t limited to one industry,” he said. “When education and employers collaborate across sectors, students gain a clearer picture of where these skills apply, and regions build stronger, more adaptable talent pipelines.”
With thousands of unfilled cybersecurity roles in the state, that alignment helps keep learning connected to opportunity.
Advertisement
When students know their learning connects directly to real jobs, it changes how they approach the work. They’re not just completing assignments; they’re preparing for environments they know they’ll encounter.— Tanner Gamble
How Industry Partnerships Shape Learning
For educators, industry engagement can change what is possible inside schools. Tanner Gamble, the computer science and cybersecurity teacher at Childersburg High School in Talladega County, has seen how employer involvement reshapes student motivation and confidence.
“When students know their learning connects directly to real jobs, it changes how they approach the work,” Gamble said. “They’re not just completing assignments; they’re preparing for environments they know they’ll encounter.”
Preparing teachers for industry-aligned instruction is also central to the effort, said Ira Lacy, who trains educators and connects them with employers to support cybersecurity pathways across Alabama.
Advertisement
“When you train teachers using industry practices and give students access to authentic experiences, you start building a pipeline that lasts,” Lacy said. “We’ve seen graduates in North Alabama come back to mentor younger students and invest in their hometowns, and now we’re applying the same approach in eastern Alabama.”
Internships and industry-aligned credentials help validate pathways at the school level by demonstrating clear connections between classroom instruction and real workforce needs.
“Internships and credentials act as the ‘proof of work’ for school cybersecurity programs,” said Hillary Rogers, principal of Childersburg High School. “They bridge the gap between theory and real-world practice, ensuring students aren’t just learning about the digital front lines — they’re equipped to operate in them.”
Gavin (right), a junior at Childersburg High School, poses with a classmate after passing the Tech+ certification exam at Central Alabama Community College.
Learning That Changes Trajectories
That impact is evident in Gavin’s experience, a junior at Childersburg High School who participated in a summer internship with the IT department at Heritage South Credit Union. During the internship, Gavin worked alongside IT staff, troubleshooting real systems, building and maintaining network infrastructure, and learning how access and risk are managed in real-world settings.
Advertisement
The experience opened the door to continued applied learning. Gavin now supports the IT department at Childersburg High School and earned his CompTIA Tech+ certification, an early milestone in a pathway focused on technical skill development and professional responsibility.
“The internship allowed me to start dreaming for myself and what I want my future to look like,” Gavin said. “I’ve always been interested in space, and now I can see different paths, like working in aerospace or eventually leading an IT department near Huntsville.”
For employers and educators, helping students see concrete future pathways is a powerful outcome of early work-based learning.
Why Employers Invest
While not every employer is positioned to host interns, those who engage early gain clearer insight into student readiness and stronger workforce alignment. Early exposure helps employers identify motivated learners and reduce uncertainty in later hiring decisions.
Advertisement
“If we wait until graduation to connect with talent, we’ve missed an opportunity,” Ross said. “Early exposure helps students prepare, and it helps employers build a workforce that understands their needs.”
At a regional level, these investments can contribute to rural economic stability by increasing the likelihood that students will pursue and remain in local careers.
A Blueprint for Other Regions
EARCA is part of broader efforts led by Digital Promise’s Center for Learner Pathway Innovations to develop statewide cybersecurity pathways that connect education and workforce systems. Pathways are strongest when learning, work and community are connected early. For students like Gavin, that collaboration opens doors. For employers, it helps ensure the next generation is ready to meet that demand.
Looking ahead: Mozilla has recently made efforts to revitalize the Firefox project. The free, independent browser is expected to undergo significant changes over the next few months, and the company is now sharing some of the ideas its developers are working on. With any luck, it will be enough to stop Firefox from losing millions of users every month.
Mozilla is trying to innovate and bring new features to Firefox, but the browser continues to lose users. Despite these concerning market trends, the company is actively working to improve the ailing browser, so much so that it has published a new roadmap highlighting the most important changes coming to the project.
Mozilla recently introduced the roadmap alongside the changelog for Firefox 152. The latest release already includes some of the improvements listed in the roadmap, while other features have been announced for the first time.
The Firefox roadmap organizes upcoming changes by category. The “Productivity” section includes the previously announced Nova design refresh, tab group support on mobile platforms, and customizable keyboard shortcuts. PDF editing is also set to improve significantly, with new capabilities for splitting, merging, and reordering files.
Advertisement
Mozilla said customizable keyboard shortcuts are one of the most requested features in terms of browser customization. Firefox has always emphasized security and privacy, which is why future releases will bring a built-in VPN feature to mobile devices as well. For iOS users, Firefox will soon offer basic ad and tracker blocking without requiring external add-ons.
Firefox 152 introduced a redesigned Settings page, while optional AI tools are expected to soon include a “Quick Answers” feature that allows users to interact with chatbots using voice commands. Mozilla says Firefox is taking a different approach to AI than other browsers, and that users will remain in control of the LLM-based capabilities available in the software.
Performance, built-in safety protections, and new web API support will also be a major focus of upcoming releases. The latest version introduced experimental support for the JPEG XL image format, and HDR video support is finally arriving on Windows and Linux systems. Firefox users have been requesting proper HDR media playback support in the browser for more than six years.
Advertisement
Mozilla says Firefox has always been built in the open, and the new roadmap continues that philosophy. Meanwhile, the browser’s desktop market share fell from 5.88% (May 2025) to 3.79% (May 2026), according to Statcounter data.
Ultimately, true HDR support and an updated roadmap may still be too little, too late to reverse the decline of a browser that has struggled to maintain relevance in recent years.
We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.
Milwaukee power tools are known for their dynamic power output. When compared directly to their competitors from other brands, Milwaukee tools often outmuscle basically all challengers (but not always, some alternatives do outpower select Milwaukee models). All that heft demands plenty of power support though. The M18 lineup is a cordless range, and so Milwaukee’s catalog naturally includes a wide range of battery options to power its most demanding equipment. The Milwaukee website includes 13 products in its battery subsection, and some support equipment, like a new hybrid four-port super charger, will soon expand upon that list.
Advertisement
The rapid charger is a great new augmentation for anyone frequently deploying some of Milwaukee’s most energy-demanding tools, but it’s not alone in this effort. Milwaukee’s largest battery packs are its M18 RedLithium Forge HD 12.0Ah batteries. The batteries are significant in size, weighing 3.3 pounds apiece. They’re also expensive, found at Home Depot, for instance, at $229 each. For that expense, you’ll get a high-density power pack that also brings a 35-minute supercharge capability, bringing the pack back to 80%. These batteries are excellent when reaching for some of Milwaukee’s most power-hungry tools, including some usual suspects like table saws, heavy-duty outdoor power tools, and more. These are the Milwaukee M18 tools that can benefit the most from a massive power pack.
The M18 Fuel 21-Inch Auger Propelled Dual Battery Single Stage Snow Blower is a massive power producer, with the ability to throw snow up to 35 feet away. It produces 7.5 horsepower at its peak. The blower offers a similar working experience to a 252cc gas alternative but features a startup procedure that takes less than one second and generates a sound level 10 decibels lower than a comparable gas model as a result of its electric power. To generate all that snow-throwing ability, the snow blower leans on two installed batteries at a time to give it power. What’s more, when purchased as a kit, the blower comes with two of Milwaukee’s Forge HD 12.0Ah batteries. For those with smaller batteries on hand, the blower can also accept up to four individual power packs.
When powering the blower with two of Milwaukee’s largest batteries, the tool still provides plenty of oomph. It can clear up to 500 feet of sidewalk or the equivalent of 11 car spaces with average density snow six inches deep. The snow blower also utilizes a rubber auger that drives the tool through the snow, creating a self-propelled operation that limits the push required from you as the operator, but adds yet another layer of power requirements into the mix. The snow blower can be found at Home Depot for $1,499 in its kit variant.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 9-Gallon Dual Battery Dust Extractor
Milwaukee’s M18 Fuel 9-Gallon Dual Battery Dust Extractor is another tool that comes in a kit format with two Forge HD 12.0Ah batteries included alongside a slate of accessories. The tool requires two batteries to operate, and once again it’s heavily implied that Milwaukee’s suggested mode of powering the tool is with these more extreme battery packs. The tool’s stated runtime adds another good reason to reach for the heavier power producers. When paired with the two batteries that come in the kit, you’ll get 41 minutes of continuous cleaning time and up to 78 minutes in max runtime mode. Either of these will often be enough for a DIYer or moderate-level user to work through their cleaning needs, but in shop settings heavier use is the rule rather than the exception, and large batteries will likely be non-negotiable.
Notably, the extractor can deliver immense power output. It’s also worth noting that the tool delivers hybrid power support, running with M18 batteries or corded power for even better longevity. When plugged in, the tool can produce 175 CFM air speeds and up to a 125 CFM rating on battery power. The dust extractor can be attached to other power tools to make cleaning tasks easier (like an SDS drill or sander). It also has the ability to clean up wet material. It can be found at Acme Tools for $899 without the batteries, or $1,499 with them included.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 1-Inch D-Handle High Torque Impact Wrench
Power tool users can find impact wrenches built to a wide range of specifications. Most notably, impact wrenches tend to offer one of a handful of anvil types, and some of the most potent cordless impact wrenches produce well over 1,000 ft.-lbs. of max torque. The M18 Fuel 1-Inch D-Handle High Torque Impact Wrench goes beyond what a standard pistol grip-style impact wrench can generally muster, producing 2,000 ft.-lbs. of maximum breakaway torque (and a surprisingly similar 1,900 ft.-lbs. of fastening power). The tool is built with a heavy-duty setup featuring a large D-handle on top, organizing the tool’s visual layout more like an SDS drill built to cause destruction rather than the more friendly-looking combi-drill.
The tool is a hefty piece of equipment, too. It weighs nearly 21 pounds before adding a battery into the mix, and when purchased as a kit, you’ll get two Forge HD 12.0Ah batteries alongside the tool. Using one of these batteries, the impact wrench promises the ability to install up to 200 1-1/4-inch bolts. It’s a savage fastening and removal tool that hungers for the support of an equally powerful battery pack. It’s available at Home Depot for $1,499 as a kit.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel Blower
A theme begins to emerge within the subset of tools in Milwaukee’s catalog that behave best when paired with a large battery. When purchased as a kit, you’ll encounter these tools paired up with Milwaukee’s Forge batteries, often featuring the 12.0Ah model, and sometimes as a duo of power packs even when the tool doesn’t demand multiple power sources to operate. The M18 Fuel Blower is yet another tool available in the kit variant, with the addition of a Forge HD 12.0Ah battery. It’s available in this format at Home Depot for a very favorable (given the cost of a battery on its own) $299 price tag. The blower produces up to 120 MPH air speeds with a 500 CFM rating. It also produces 12.2 N to generate intense, constant power output. The tool can reach full throttle in under one second and features a variable-speed trigger for precise control over the blowing power you require. The tool is significantly quieter than its primary competition, producing 54 dB(A).
Advertisement
Milwaukee notes that this tool is designed specifically to operate optimally when paired with a Forge battery, and the HD 12.0Ah battery pack that comes with the kit suggests that plenty of value can be found in an extra-large power source. As is the case with some other tools that operate in a constant-on state (think sanders, angle grinders, or table saws), this tool ultimately presents itself as a power hog, making the 12.0Ah battery a worthwhile investment.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel Edger
Another outdoor power tool on the list of Milwaukee equipment that ships with a Forge HD 12.0Ah battery when purchased as a kit, the M18 Fuel Edger is a natural, power-hungry cutting and cleanup solution. Not only is this tool built to operate with Forge batteries, but it’s also optimized for use specifically with Forge HD 12.0Ah models. It’s available at Acme Tools as a kit for $449. Pairing it with one of these power packs lets it deliver on its promise to replace a gas-powered edger. The tool’s brushless motor creates more power than a 31cc gas engine, delivering intense blade speed to power through even thick growth to create pristine edges every time you pull out the tool to finish off your landscaping tasks.
The edger features a fixed shaft that produces less vibration and is relatively lightweight. It can reach full throttle in under one second and deliver cutting depths of up to two inches. Edging is a tricky task for the tool that performs it because you’ll often find that the blade comes into contact with concrete elements sharing this boundary line with your grass. As a result, any edger you take out of the garage will need to have the power to roll with the punches that come from contact with this hardened surface. A large Forge battery enables the Milwaukee tool to provide just that.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 7-1/4-Inch Circular Saw
Milwaukee makes a few high-intensity cutting tools, and among its circular saws, the M18 Fuel 7-1/4-Inch Circular Saw is a cornerstone for many renovators, contractors, and builders. It delivers intense cutting power and, when paired with the right battery, can perform for extended periods. It’s probably for this reason that Milwaukee offers a kit bundle with an M18 Forge HD 12.0Ah battery included with the tool. The kit can be found at Home Depot for $449.
The saw is a hefty (but not utterly unmanageable) 11.1 pounds with the battery installed, and delivers 750 cuts per charge when paired with Milwaukee’s largest battery pack. It produces a no-load speed of 6,000 RPM and features the ability to maintain high speeds even when strained under the demands of hardwood lumber. It features an electric blade brake and utilizes some quality-of-life enhancements like an LED work light built into the tool as well as a rafter hook to make this an all-day cutting option for heavy-duty users.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 9-Inch Cut-Off Saw
The M18 Fuel 9-Inch Cut-Off Saw is a powerful cutting tool designed to handle concrete and other similarly dense materials. This is not your typical saw, and therefore it demands the support of some serious batteries to deliver on runtime and power production targets. It’s also expensive, retailing as a bare tool at Home Depot for $679. The tool produces a cut depth of 3.4 inches with an onboard water connection featuring a quick-connect system to help keep the blade cooler for longer. It produces 6,600 RPM no-load speed and is as much as 50% lighter (weighing 10.6 pounds as a bare tool) than a comparable gas-powered alternative.
While the saw isn’t offered as a kit option, Milwaukee notes that the tool is optimized for use with a Forge HD 12.0Ah battery, specifically. The saw includes added functionality like a RAPIDSTOP blade brake to generate faster stoppages between cuts so that you can line up the tool for your next incision more safely and more quickly. It features a fully adjustable guard and is compatible with Milwaukee’s ONE-KEY system to track and manage your power tools, which is particularly useful for jobsites and the crews that work on them.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 8-1/4-Inch Table Saw
The table saw is a hungry beast and is a tool that can help level up your woodworking skill when the time comes. The tool features a blade that continues to spin until you power it down, rather than the trigger-activated cutting performance of an alternative like a circular or miter saw. This alone requires plenty of consistent power to keep the tool in operation for the duration of your needs. Milwaukee’s M18 Fuel 8-1/4-Inch Table Saw can handle 24½-inch rip cuts. It also provides the equivalent of a fully functional 15-amp corded model, and the tool’s overview makes a specific mention of the Forge HD 12.0Ah battery pack to support its maximum runtime. The saw offers the ability to cut up to 600 linear feet on a single charge, and offers a 2½-inch maximum cut depth at 90 degrees.
Advertisement
The saw is constructed with an all-metal frame for great durability even on demanding jobsites. It produces a no-load blade speed of 6,300 RPM, spinning up and continuing to run for as long as you require between rip cuts or repeated miters. The tool’s rack and pinion fence runs the length of the table, as well, delivering quality precision. It’s available at Home Depot for $599 as a bare tool or $749 in a bundle with a charger and Forge HD 12.0Ah battery.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 16-Inch String Trimmer
The M18 Fuel 16-Inch String Trimmer comes in a kit with the vaunted Forge HD 12.0Ah battery. It produces up to 1.76 horsepower and delivers more cutting power than an equivalent 31cc gas trimmer. The tool has enough juice to power through even dense growth without bogging down the motor, and its advanced air-cooling system helps extend its longevity throughout a landscaping job. The trimmer offers three speed settings alongside a variable speed trigger for maximum performance control.
It’s available at Home Depot as a bare tool for $229, although the outlet doesn’t currently have an option to bundle the trimmer with a 12Ah battery; you can get an 8.0Ah battery and charger with the unit for $349. The wicked spin rate this tool produces at its highest setting (up to 6,200 RPM), alongside the heavy-duty motor performance standards, makes this a great candidate to run with a bulky battery pack for the longest possible runtime and highest overall output.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel Sewer Sectional Machine
The M18 Fuel Sewer Sectional Machine isn’t a tool that most users will encounter in their regular maintenance and renovation routines. Nevertheless, it’s yet another tool featured as a kit with two M18 Forge HD 12.0Ah batteries included in the bundle. The machine (with the kit bundle) can be found at Acme Tools for $3,499, underpinning its niche characteristics. The tool is a sewer blockage cleaner, utilizing a cable drive system that both feeds and retracts the cable, minimizing the amount of physical exertion a user must experience to clear blockages in a system. The tool can clear roots up to 200 feet out operates with one battery installed at a time.
It can handle sewer blockages in two to eight-inch lateral lines. The tool’s bi-directional operation means that it’s constantly relying on its power source to continue driving toward the clearance result you’ll be seeking, making the large batteries a natural partner for the piece of heavy duty equipment.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 2-Gallon Compact Quiet Compressor
An air compressor is a must-have accessory when using any pneumatic tool. Air-powered implements are almost always lighter and feature fewer moving parts, making them tools that can typically operate for longer between scheduled maintenance requirements. These features make them ideal solutions for plenty of professional tool users who operate their equipment throughout the bulk of a workday. However, mobility issues come into play since the setup that powers these implements will often be a large piece of shop equipment or require an outlet to run.
The M18 Fuel 2-Gallon Compact Quiet Compressor puts a different spin on things, allowing you to move your air compressor around quickly and efficiently. The compressor weighs 31.25 pounds and produces a sound level of 68 dB(A). It delivers a maximum PSI of 135 and a SCFM rating of 1.2 at 90 PSI. Naturally, a tool delivering always-on performance like this will require a hefty battery pack to generate the best runtime possible. The bigger the better, although Milwaukee notes that it can deliver enough power to drive 1,600 18-gauge brad nails on a single charge without mentioning the battery size that supports this output. The air compressor can be found at Acme Tools for $399.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 14-Inch Top Handle Chainsaw
Chainsaws eat up power, and when paired with your battery up to the task an electric chainsaw has the ability to stand toe to toe against some of the most heavy duty gasoline powered alternatives on the market. The M18 Fuel 14-Inch Top Handle Chainsaw is a great example of a tool capable of handling intense cutting demands. The tool weighs 10.8 pounds and produces a rapid chain speed of 15 meters per second. It cuts faster than an equivalent 35cc gasoline chainsaw, while minimizing the headaches of starting the tool up as well as the maintenance that goes into a traditional chainsaw motor. The tool delivers 2.7 horsepower and 3.2 Nm peak power and torque output ratings.
Advertisement
It’s capable of producing 225 cuts per charge in 4×4 cedar when paired with a Forge HD 12.0Ah battery pack, and is optimized for use with Milwaukee’s Forge batteries. It’s likely this pairing preference that has Milwaukee’s kit variant adding both a Forge High Output XC 8.0Ah and an HD 12.0Ah battery into the bundle. The saw is available at Home Depot for $299 as a bare tool or $699 with the power kit included.
Advertisement
M18 Fuel 3-by-18-Inch Belt Sander
Numerous sanding tools are available from Milwaukee and virtually all other toolmakers. Cordless sanders all share a similar drawback when paired with a small battery, given their always-on running function. But bulk material sanders are the biggest culprits, utterly demanding a huge battery to draw out their best possible performance. You can get away with a smaller power source with a detail sander at times, but you’ll rarely experience that same capability with a tool like the M18 Fuel 3-by-18-Inch Belt Sander.
It’s available from Home Depot for $329 as a bare tool, or $449 with two additional 8.0Ah batteries and a charger. That’s a good deal price, but you’ll want to think twice about relying completely on a midrange battery rather than the bulkiest powerplant that Milwaukee makes. The tool produces the equivalent power and torque of a corded eight-amp unit, and produces a huge sanding surface that offers variable speeds ranging from 1,350 surface feet per minute down to 750. This is a bulk material removal tool and demands ample power support to perform its duties.
It’s been called RAMageddon: AI’s insatiable demand for hardware has caused a worldwide shortage of memory chips. Now outgoing Apple CEO Tim Cook is warning its customers that your next Mac, iPhone, or iPad could be more expensive thanks to surging memory and storage chips costs.
In a recent interview, Cook told the WSJ that price increases are “unavoidable,” in spite of efforts to absorb chip costs that have increased fourfold since last year. He described the situation as “unsustainable.”
Cook didn’t name which products will be affected or when prices will rise, but he’s raised the alarm about the impacts of RAMageddon before. In April, after delivering record quarterly sales, he said that these higher costs could impact Apple’s next business results. Incoming CEO John Ternus also warned about the issue that same month.
If Apple raises prices, the iPhone seems almost certain to be impacted, memory supply experts told the Financial Times. The company is expected to launch its next iPhone in September, which gives it the opportunity to announce increased prices. Of course, Apple sells many other devices that contain memory (DRAM) and storage (NAND) chips, including the Apple Watch, Mac, iPad, and Apple Vision Pro.
Advertisement
It’s not clear how much more expensive any of these products will be, although research firm TechInsights gave the WSJ its estimate. It said Apple would need to add another $270 to the next iPhone Pro to keep its profit margin intact. The iPhone 17 Pro starts at $1,099.
So far AI has not been a particular boon to Apple. The company is already under pressure to figure out its AI strategy for its devices. It even paid a $250 million settlement earlier this year to end a false advertising lawsuit filed after it failed to deliver the AI features it promised two years ago.
The company’s Worldwide Developers conference held earlier this month showed progress on fulfilling those previous AI promises, including an overhaul of Siri. Of course, more on-device processing could mean more need for memory — a trajectory that seems destined to end with consumers paying more for Apple products.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login