Connect with us

Tech

Microsoft latest in the Big Tech race for AI health tools

Published

on

Copilot Health analyses health records, history and wearable data to generate ‘suggestions’ and answers.

Consumers have long used AI chatbots for healthcare queries. Despite concerns around its effectiveness, AI giants are making more dedicated tools to ask sensitive questions.

Yesterday (12 March), Microsoft introduced Copilot Health, a separate, “secure space” within the Copilot platform, where users can upload medical information and ask queries. Copilot Health, according to the company, brings together health records, wearable data, and health history into one place.

“We’re approaching the dawn of medical ‘superintelligence’ – the moment when affordable, world-class medical knowledge and support is at your fingertips whenever you need it,” commented Mustafa Suleyman, the CEO of Microsoft AI in a post on X.

Advertisement

Microsoft – as well as the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic, with similar tools – maintain that AI chatbots not a replacement for doctors, but rather something that helps users better understand their health data. Amazon has also launched a similar tool, and all of them promise privacy and security.

According to OpenAI, more than 230m people globally asked ChatGPT health and wellness-related questions weekly. By far the biggest AI chatbot with more than 900m weekly users, trends on ChatGPT are a strong indicator on overall consumer behaviour around AI usage.

While it is generally understood that AI systems don’t actually “understand” information, models are increasingly being deployed in sensitive areas such as healthcare for large-scale data analysis.

This, even as growing concern around data privacy from the service providers and third parties mount, as well as documented cases of AI ‘psychosis’, isolation and unhealthy habits.

Advertisement

Despite the concerns, as pointed out by Forrester principal analyst Arielle Trzcinski, Big Tech is winning this race over traditional healthcare providers.

“Providers that delay embedding similar tools into their own digital front doors risk losing influence over patient decisions – not because any one tool is perfect, but because they’re available,” Trzcinski said.

“These announcements signal a shift in how consumers think about access. These experiences must now offer continuous, AI‑mediated guidance.” Forrester finds that consumers responded equally favourably to AI tools provided by healthcare providers and public AI tools.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

The wild six weeks for NanoClaw’s creator that led to a deal with Docker

Published

on

It’s been a whirlwind for NanoClaw creator Gavriel Cohen. 

About six weeks ago, he introduced NanoClaw on Hacker News as a tiny, open source, secure alternative to the AI agent-building sensation OpenClaw, after he built it in a weekend coding binge. That post went viral.  

“I sat down on the couch in my sweatpants,” Cohen told TechCrunch, “and just basically melted into [it] the whole weekend, probably almost 48 hours straight.”  

About three weeks ago, an X post praising NanoClaw from famed AI researcher Andrej Karpathy went viral.  

Advertisement

About a week ago, Cohen closed down his AI marketing startup to focus full-time on NanoClaw and launch a company around it called NanoCo. The attention from Hacker News and Karpathy had translated into 22,000 stars on GitHub, 4,600 forks (people building new versions off the project), and over 50 contributors. He’s already added hundreds of updates to his project with hundreds more in the queue. 

Now, on Friday, Cohen announced a deal with Docker — the company that essentially invented the container technology NanoClaw is built on, and counts millions of developers and nearly 80,000 enterprise customers — to integrate Docker Sandboxes into NanoClaw. 

Scary security of OpenClaw 

It all started when Cohen launched an AI marketing startup with his brother, Lazer Cohen, a few months ago. The startup offered marketing services like market research, go-to-market analysis, and blog posts through a small team of people using AI agents.  

Techcrunch event

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

The agency started booking customers, and was on track to hit $1 million in annual recurring revenue, the brothers told TechCrunch. 

Advertisement

“It was going really well, great traction. I’m a huge believer in that business model of AI-native service companies that have margins and operate like a software company but are actually providing services,” said Cohen, a computer programmer who previously worked for website hosting company Wix.

He had built the agents the startup was using, largely using Claude Code, each designed to do specific tasks. But there was “a piece” missing, he said. The agent could do work when prompted, but the humans couldn’t pre-schedule work, or connect agents to team communication tools like WhatsApp and assign tasks that way. (WhatsApp is to most of the world what Slack is to corporate America.) 

Cohen heard about OpenClaw, the popular AI agent tool whose creator now works for OpenAI. Cohen used it to build out those final interfaces, and loved it. 

“There was this big aha moment of: This is the piece that connects all of these separate workflows that I’ve been building,” he said and immediately decided, “I want more of them: on R& D, on product, on client management,” one for every task the startup had to handle. 

Advertisement

But then OpenClaw scared the bejesus out of him. 

In researching a hiccup with performance, he stumbled across a file where the OpenClaw agent had downloaded all of his WhatsApp messages and stored them in plain, unencrypted text on his computer. Not just the work-related messages it was given explicit access to, but all of them, his personal messages too.  

OpenClaw has been widely panned as a “security nightmare” because of the way it accesses memory and account permissions. It is difficult to limit its access to data on a machine once it has been installed.  

That issue will likely improve over time, given the project’s popularity, but Cohen had another concern: the sheer size of OpenClaw. As he researched security options for it, he saw all the packages that had been bundled into it. It included an “obscure” open source project he himself had written a few months earlier for editing PDFs using a Google image editing model. He had no idea it was there — he wasn’t even actively maintaining that project.  

Advertisement

He realized there was no way for him to validate all OpenClaw’s code and its dependencies, which, by some estimates, sprawled across 800,000 lines of code. 

So he built his own in just 500 lines of code, intended to be used for his company, and shared it. He based it on Apple’s new container tech, which creates isolated environments that prevent software from accessing any data on a machine beyond what it is explicitly authorized to use.

Going viral

At 4 a.m., a couple of weeks after sharing it on Hacker News, his phone started ringing non-stop. A friend had seen Karpathy’s post and was urging Cohen to wake up and start tweeting, which he did, setting off a public discussion with the well-known AI researcher.  

Attention to NanoClaw followed like a landslide. More tweets, YouTube reviews from programmers, and news stories. A domain squatter even snagged a NanoClaw website URL. The correct one is nanoclaw.dev. 

Advertisement

Then Oleg Šelajev, a developer who works for Docker reached out. Šelajev saw the buzz and modified NanoClaw to replace Apple’s container technology with Docker’s competing alternative, Sandboxes.

Cohen had no hesitation about pushing out support for Sandboxes as part of the main NanoClaw project. “This is no longer my own personal agent that I’m running on my Mac Mini,” he recalled thinking. “This now has a community around it. There are thousands of people using it. Yeah, I said, I’m going to move over to the standard.” 

For all the changes these weeks have brought Cohen and his brother Lazer, now CEO and president of NanoCo, respectively, one area still needs to be figured out: how NanoCo will make money. 

NanoClaw is free and open source and, as these things go, the Cohens vow it always will be. They know they would be strung up as villains if they ever betrayed the open source community by changing that. Currently the Cohens are living on a friends-and-family fundraising round, they said.  

Advertisement

While they are cautious about announcing their commercial plans — in large part because they haven’t had a chance to fully formulate them — VCs are already calling, they say. 

The game plan is to build a fully supported commercial product with services including so-called forward-deployed engineers — specialists embedded directly with client companies to help them build and manage their systems. This will likely focus on assisting companies in building and maintaining secure agents. That is, however, a crowded field growing more crowded by the hour. 

But given the giant community of developers that NanoClaw just unlocked with Docker, we’re sure to hear more about this soon.

Pictured above from left to right, Lazer and Gavriel Cohen.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How to watch The Madison season 1 online from anywhere

Published

on

Contrary to popular belief, The Madison is not another Yellowstone spinoff. The neo-Western drama, which stars Michelle Pfeiffer and Kurt Russell as Clyburn family matriarch Stacy and patriarch Preston, was created by Taylor Sheridan and is set predominantly in Montana, but that’s where the similarities end.

You can watch The Madison season 1 online from anywhere with a VPN.

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

You’ll now have to fork out for an additional subscription if you want to watch 4K content on Prime Video

Published

on

Amazon is the price of its ad-free Prime Video subscription and locking 4K UHD streaming behind this new tier. Starting April 10 for US customers, a rebranded Prime Video Ultra subscription will cost $5 per month, up from $3 per month.

For that extra $2, you get a download capacity increase from 25 to 100, and you can now run five streams concurrently instead of three. Whether those “Ultra” upgrades are worth the $24 annual hike will probably depend on how many boxsets you like to plough through on a long flight, or how many devices are using your Prime Video account.

The changes are most galling for Prime members who automatically qualify for Prime Video with ads through their membership, as Amazon has decided to remove 4K streaming from the standard tier. That means that, despite already paying $15 per month or $139 per year for Amazon Prime, you’ll be stuck with 1080p shows and movies unless you sign up to Prime Video Ultra.

Amazon has thrown in Dolby Vision support for the first time, as well as upping the concurrent stream and download count on its free tier as well, but you’re losing the privilege of UHD content that has been available to all Prime Video members for years. Dolby Atmos remains exclusive to the $5 tier too.

Advertisement

Amazon is the latest streamer to put its prices up, following similar recent hikes to , and . If you don’t want to give the company any more of your hard-earned, you have just under a month to binge your way through the second season of  in all of its irradiated UHD glory.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Report: TerraPower leadership faces tough questions about Gates, Myhrvold and Epstein ties

Published

on

TerraPower signage. (TerraPower Photo)

Employees of the nuclear power company TerraPower questioned CEO Chris Levesque on Thursday about connections between convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and company board leaders Bill Gates and Nathan Myhrvold.

Levesque called the ties a “troubling situation” in a town-hall meeting with staff, The Seattle Times reported, but said there were no links between the Bellevue, Wash.-business and either Epstein or his money.

Gates, the Microsoft co-founder and former CEO, and Myhrvold, former Microsoft CTO, launched TerraPower in 2006 out of Intellectual Ventures, the Bellevue-based firm founded by Myhrvold that supports the development of innovative technologies. Gates is currently chairman of TerraPower’s company board while Myhrvold serves as vice chair.

In the town-hall meeting, an employee asked how women could feel safe and respected if presenting at future board meetings, the Times reported.

Details of Epstein’s relationships with prominent elected and business leaders were revealed in the millions of pages of unsealed court documents that include emails, notes, flight logs, photos and videos and financial records associated with the deceased pedophile.

Advertisement

Gates apologized last month to Gates Foundation staff for his past interactions with Epstein, acknowledging in an internal town hall that the situation puts the global health foundation’s reputation at risk, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

Gates met with Epstein multiple times from 2011 to 2014, years after the financier had pleaded guilty to soliciting a minor for prostitution, according to the WSJ report. 

In the meeting with foundation employees, Gates acknowledged two extramarital affairs (with a Russian bridge player and a Russian nuclear physicist) that Epstein later discovered through a mutual connection. Gates insisted he didn’t participate in or witness any of Epstein’s crimes, WSJ reported, telling staff, “I did nothing illicit. I saw nothing illicit.”

Gates has not been accused of wrongdoing by any of Epstein’s victims.

Advertisement

The Seattle Times has separately reported on deeper ties between Myhrvold and Epstein, including emails showing the two met regularly in Seattle and New York from 2010 through 2018, and correspondence that appeared to show Myhrvold visiting Epstein’s private island. 

Myhrvold was also listed as a “friend” in Epstein’s 2003 birthday book and contributed a personal letter to the project, as GeekWire previously reported

A spokesperson for Myhrvold said previously that he knew Epstein “from TED conferences and as a donor to basic scientific research” and “regrets that he ever met him.”

On Thursday, Levesque acknowledged, “Some of the news is troubling, but again there’s no evidence of any wrongdoing,” the Times reported. “This is stuff that we’ll continue to work through with our board,” he added.

Advertisement

Reached by GeekWire, a company spokesperson said via email: “TerraPower has no additional comments outside of what was shared directly with employees.”

TerraPower last week became the first company in the nation to receive federal approval for construction of its next-generation nuclear power plant. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a unanimous decision allowing work on its Wyoming demonstration plant to take essential next steps.

The company is engineering a new model of smaller, less expensive nuclear reactors that can be produced in three years from fabricated components — instead of the past approach of constructing giant, one-off structures that take a decade to erect. The reactors will be able to generate 345 of power around-the-clock, plus bursts of power provided by molten salt batteries.

New energy sources including TerraPower reactors are in high demand as tech giants seek renewable power to electrify their data center and AI operations.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Uber relaunches Motional robotaxis in Las Vegas

Published

on

Two years after a brutal restructuring gutted Motional’s workforce and halted its commercial operations, the Hyundai-backed AV company is back on the Strip, still with a safety operator for now, but promising to remove one by the end of 2026.


Uber and Motional have relaunched a commercial robotaxi service in Las Vegas, making all-electric Motional IONIQ 5 vehicles available to riders across key locations on and around the Strip from 13 March 2026.

The service marks a significant milestone for Motional, which two years ago paused its commercial operations entirely, cut roughly 40% of its workforce, and was left fighting for its survival after co-founder Aptiv pulled its funding.

The relaunch is not yet fully driverless. Initially, Motional’s IONIQ 5 robotaxis will carry a human vehicle operator monitoring the road from the driver’s seat.

Advertisement

The company says it expects to remove the safety operator and begin a fully driverless service by the end of 2026, delivering on the target it set during its 2024 restructuring.

How the service works

Riders who request an UberX, Uber Electric, Uber Comfort, or Uber Comfort Electric may be matched with a Motional IONIQ 5 at no additional cost. When matched, a notification appears in the app giving riders the option to accept the autonomous vehicle or switch to a conventional ride.

Users who want to maximise their chances of getting an AV can opt in via the Ride Preferences section in their Uber app settings.

Once a robotaxi arrives, the vehicle can be unlocked and the trip started entirely through the Uber app.

Inside, audio cues prompt riders to close doors and fasten seatbelts. If support is needed at any point, a human assistance team is reachable through the Uber app.

Advertisement

At launch, the service covers designated rideshare zones along Las Vegas Boulevard at Resorts World Las Vegas and Encore at the Wynn, plus Westgate Las Vegas Resort & Casino, curbside locations in Downtown Las Vegas, and the Town Square shopping district near the airport.

Both companies say they plan to expand the operating area but did not give specifics.

The vehicle: SAE Level 4, FMVSS-certified

The IONIQ 5 robotaxi was co-developed by Motional and Hyundai Motor Group and is custom-built for ride-hail operations. According to Uber, it is one of the first SAE Level 4-capable autonomous vehicles to be certified under US Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), the federal regulatory framework for motor vehicle equipment.

SAE Level 4 means the vehicle can handle all driving functions within a defined operational design domain without human intervention, though it does not require the capability to operate in all conditions everywhere.

Advertisement

“This milestone reflects our shared commitment to introduce autonomous vehicles in a way that prioritizes safety, increases reliability, and expands access to more ride options for our customers,” said Sarfraz Maredia, President of Autonomous Mobility & Delivery, Uber

Motional’s road back: from near-collapse to relaunch

The relaunch is the culmination of a turbulent two-year recovery. Motional was founded in 2020 as a $4 billion equal joint venture between Hyundai Motor Group and automotive technology company Aptiv.

It ran pilot rides in Las Vegas via Uber and Lyft and deliveries in Los Angeles via Uber Eats, all with a human safety operator present, and accumulated more than 130,000 autonomous rides through those programmes.

The company’s troubles crystallised in early 2024, when Aptiv announced it would stop allocating capital to the venture, citing the high cost of commercialising robotaxi technology and an uncertain path to profitability. Aptiv had forecast a non-cash equity loss of around $340 million for 2024 alone.

Advertisement

With Aptiv’s withdrawal threatening to destabilise the entire company, Hyundai stepped in with a near-$1 billion commitment: $475 million invested directly into Motional and $448 million to buy out 11% of Aptiv’s common equity interest. The restructuring left Hyundai with approximately 85% of Motional’s common equity and Aptiv with 15%.

The funding came with painful conditions. Motional halted all commercial rides and deliveries, paused plans to launch its second-generation driverless service, and cut approximately 550 staff, around 40% of its total workforce, across teams in Las Vegas, Pittsburgh, California, and Massachusetts. T

he company pivoted to focus exclusively on improving its underlying autonomous technology, including a shift toward a more neural network-driven approach to autonomy, before attempting any new commercial deployment.

Motional returned to fundraising in August 2025 with a $550 million Series B round led by Aptiv and joined by Hyundai and Nuance Investments, which boosted its valuation to $6.5 billion. That capital, combined with the technology rebuild, underpins today’s relaunch.

Advertisement

A busy week for Uber’s autonomous ambitions

The Las Vegas launch is not a standalone announcement. In the same week, Uber confirmed a deal with Zoox, Amazon’s autonomous vehicle subsidiary, to deploy Zoox’s purpose-built robotaxis on the Uber platform, initially in Las Vegas from summer 2026, followed by Los Angeles in mid-2027.

Uber and Wayve also announced a collaboration with Nissan on a robotaxi pilot in Tokyo, targeted for late 2026, which would be Uber’s first autonomous vehicle partnership in Japan.

Uber says it is currently working with more than 25 autonomous vehicle partners across its Mobility, Delivery, and Freight divisions. The company announced earlier in 2026 that it plans to invest more than $100 million in charging infrastructure for autonomous vehicles.

Its autonomous solutions division, launched in February 2026 under Maredia’s oversight, is focused on helping AV technology companies commercialise their deployments faster by providing demand generation, rider experience, customer support, and fleet management services.

Advertisement

For Motional, the Las Vegas service is both a proof point and a pressure test. The company’s technology, rebuilt and retrained in the background since 2024, now faces its first sustained real-world commercial deployment with paying riders. 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Onerep vs Incogni (2026): Which Data Removal Service Delivers Better Protection?

Published

on

Right now, deleting a couple of public listings of your personal information is hardly enough to reduce your digital presence in any significant way. What’s more, your data circulates not only across people-search sites but also in marketing networks, analytics firms, recruitment databases, or risk-profiling systems, and many of these sources you’re incapable of reaching on your own.

That’s why it’s worth investing in a reliable data removal service with its automation, recurring requests, and the breadth of broker coverage.

Incogni and Onerep are two established providers in the data removal service field. To help you decide, we compare them below, clarifying where each company stands today.

Quick Comparison (2026)

Feature Incogni Onerep
Pricing From $7.99/month (annual billing) From $8.33/month (annual billing)
Removal model Fully automated with recurring requests Mixed automation + manual handling
Broker coverage 420+ private and public brokers 300+ websites, mostly public people-search listings
Free tier 30-day money-back guarantee 5-day trial, 30-day money-back guarantee
Recurring removal cycles Every 60-90 days Monthly
Independent verification Deloitte Limited Assurance assessment None publicly reported
Customer support Email, live chat (subscribers), phone (Unlimited subscribers), Knowledge Base Email (plan-dependent), support tickets, dedicated privacy expert (higher tiers), phone, Help Desk

Onerep vs Incogni: Service Snapshot & Core Positioning

Incogni Onerep
Year founded 2021 2015
Company type Automated data broker removal platform People-search directory removal service
Primary scope Public and private broker ecosystem Public-facing, searchable directories
Automation structure Fully automated, recurring cycles Hybrid model: automation + privacy expert
Data reappearance prevention model Automated recurring legal re-requests every 60–90 days Monitoring and suppression of relisted directory entries
Editorial recognition Editors’ Choice Awards – PCMag and PCWorld No major 2026 editorial awards reported
Independent verification Limited Assurance Assessment by Deloitte Not publicly reported
Trustpilot 4.4/5 (2,000+ reviews) 4.7/5 (380+ reviews)
Global availability 34 countries Primarily US

Onerep vs Incogni: Pricing & Plans (March, 2026)

Incogni

Incogni starts at $7.99 per month when billed annually. If paid monthly, it’s from $15.98 per month. All its plans include automated removal across 420+ brokers and recurring processing by default. Higher tiers provide expanded support options or add prioritization.

Incogni is also bundled with other data protection ecosystems: with NordProtect or included in Surfshark One+ subscription. This allows users to expand their privacy toolkit and integrate data removal into a unified, broader suite.

Advertisement

Incogni doesn’t offer any free tiers or trials, but there’s a 30-day money-back guarantee. Family and enterprise options are available.

Onerep

Onerep’s cheapest plan is $8.33 per month if billed annually. Billed annually, the prices start at $14.95 per month. It offers a 5-day free trial and a 30-day money-back guarantee. Family and enterprise plans are available.

Onerep is a standalone subscription, not available combined with larger privacy suites.

Broker Coverage

Incogni Onerep
420+ brokers 300+ sites
Custom removals from an additional 2,000+ sites with Unlimited plans Public people-search directories focus
Public-search sites Opt-out requests sent to supported listing sites 
Marketing data brokers Monitoring and relisting suppression
risk and background profiling companies Not engaged with private marketing or profiling networks
Risk and background profiling companies
recurring requests every 60 days for public and 90 days for private listings
Recurring requests every 60 days for public and 90 days for private listings

As such, the difference between Incogni and Onerep when it comes to coverage lies less in whether removals occur at all and more in how broadly data sources are covered.

Transparency, Verification & Public Trust

Incogni

Incogni provides a clear dashboard with request logs and their statuses that you can track, but don’t have to for the system to work efficiently

Advertisement

The company has also undergone a Deloitte Limited Assurance Assessment that evaluated and confirmed different aspects of Incogni’s removal processes.

Incogni has received Editors’ Choice recognition from both PCMag and PCWorld and multiple positive reviews from industry experts.

Along with its excellent Trustpilot rating, reviews praise the provider’s ability to actually reduce spam with minimal user involvement.

Onerep

Onerep provides a clear, visible listing tracking within its supported directories. It allows its users to see exactly which sources were identified and what was removed. 

Advertisement

However, the company hasn’t published any independent third-party verification comparable to Incogni’s limited assurance assessment.

What’s more, the privacy and security industry has also been influenced by information from Krebs on Security about Onerep’s CEO, who was reported to be creating public people-search sites. It has certainly shaped public discourse on transparency.

While Onerep’s Trustpilot rating is high, it isn’t based on many reviews.

Final Words: Choosing the Right Level of Protection in 2026

Incogni and Onerep were both designed to solve similar digital privacy problems. 

Advertisement

Onerep is more about removing personal data from publicly visible directory listings, which helps users reduce exposure in search results.

Incogni, on the other hand, is built for broader suppression. It engages both public directories and private data brokers. It also repeats requests on recurring cycles, addressing not only what’s on the surface but also in the behind-the-scenes databases that actually fuel marketing, profiling, and data trading.

As data circulation becomes more complex and concerning in 2026, broker coverage matters more than ever. If your goal is long-term, vast privacy control, Incogni currently offers a more comprehensive solution.

FAQ

How does OneRep protect my real contact info during broker outreach?
Advertisement

OneRep utilizes dummy email addresses and disposable phone numbers when contacting brokers to ensure your actual information isn’t re-harvested during the opt-out process.

Are there any trust or reliability concerns I should consider?

As of 2026, some users remain cautious of OneRep due to reports regarding the founder’s ties to the data broker industry. Incogni maintains high trust through Deloitte’s independent limited assurance assessment.

Advertisement
Which platform is more effective for local US search results?

OneRep focuses exclusively on U.S.-based directories and people-search sites, making it highly efficient for domestic results. Incogni covers more brokers globally, but some of those may be less relevant to a US-only audience.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Ramp buys Stockholm fintech Billhop

Published

on

The $32 billion US spend management platform acquires a licensed payments provider to launch corporate cards and finance tools in the UK and EU this summer.


The corporate spend management market just shifted its centre of gravity. On 13 March 2026, Ramp, the New York-based financial operations platform valued at $32 billion, announced the acquisition of Billhop, a Stockholm and London payments firm licensed to operate across the European Economic Area and the UK.

The deal gives Ramp the regulatory infrastructure it needs to onboard European and British businesses directly, something it plans to begin doing this summer.

The timing is not subtle. In January, Capital One announced a $5.15 billion deal to acquire Brex, Ramp’s long-time US rival and once the defining name in startup corporate cards.

Advertisement

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

That deal is expected to close in the second quarter of 2026. Ramp’s move into Europe lands while Brex is navigating an acquisition by a traditional bank, and while the question of what happens to Brex’s product roadmap and founder-friendly positioning under Capital One remains unanswered.

The acquisition of Billhop is primarily a licensing and infrastructure play. Billhop, founded in 2012 and headquartered in Stockholm, is a payments infrastructure provider that enables businesses to pay invoices by credit card, even to suppliers that do not ordinarily accept card payments.

Advertisement

It holds a Swedish Payment Institution licence from Finansinspektionen, Sweden’s financial regulator, and is separately authorised and regulated by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority.

Those licences give Ramp what it could not quickly build itself: the regulatory standing to process payments across EEA member states and the UK as two distinct jurisdictions.

As part of the acquisition, Ramp will open its first international offices in London and Stockholm. The company currently serves nearly half its customers with some form of international payment capability, it supports transactions in over 180 countries and offers local currency cards in Canada, Australia, Japan, Mexico, and Singapore, but all of those customers are US-headquartered businesses.

The Billhop acquisition makes it possible, for the first time, to sign up companies based in the UK and EU as primary customers.

Advertisement

“We’ve spent years building Ramp into something the most ambitious US companies rely on. This summer, for the first time, companies headquartered in the UK and EU will be able to use Ramp directly. In their first year, the median Ramp customer saves 5% and grows revenue 16%. Europe is home to extraordinary companies. We can’t wait to get to work.”

That was Eric Glyman, Ramp’s co-founder and CEO, in the company’s announcement.

Niklas Bothén, CEO of Billhop,  who was appointed to the role in a planned leadership transition in late 2024, having joined the company as COO in 2020, framed the deal as a scale-up of Billhop’s core mission.

“Our mission at Billhop has always been to remove friction from B2B payments and make it easier for businesses to manage their spend. Joining Ramp allows us to realise that vision at a much larger scale.”

Advertisement

Ramp’s broader platform, which combines corporate cards, expense management, vendor payments, procurement, travel booking, and automated bookkeeping, processes over $100 billion in purchases annually and is used by more than 50,000 customers.

The company says its customers have collectively saved over $10 billion and 27.5 million hours since its founding in 2019. It raised a $312 million Series E round in November 2025, which brought its valuation to $32 billion.

The context for all of this is a market in transition. Brex, which was valued at $12.3 billion in 2022, agreed to sell to Capital One for $5.15 billion, less than half its peak valuation, in January 2026.

The markdown reflects a period in which Brex’s core customer base of venture-backed startups sharply reduced spending as funding dried up, while Ramp, with a broader customer mix and a stronger focus on cost savings and efficiency tools, continued to grow.

Advertisement

Ramp surpassed $1 billion in annualised recurring revenue in October 2025. Brex’s exit leaves Ramp as effectively the dominant independent spend management platform in the US market.

The European market Ramp is entering is materially different from the one it has built its US business on. Corporate card penetration in Europe is lower, B2B payment infrastructure is more fragmented across national markets, and the regulatory requirements for operating as a payment institution vary significantly by jurisdiction.

Billhop’s model, specifically designed to bridge the gap between card-paying buyers and non-card-accepting suppliers across European markets, addresses exactly the structural friction that has historically made it difficult for US-centric spend management platforms to gain traction in the region.

Financial terms of the Billhop acquisition were not disclosed. No acquisition price has been published by either party.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Running A PC Off AA Cells With Buck Converters Really Boosts Performance

Published

on

After the previous attempt of running a PC off AA cells got a lot of comments, [ScuffedBits] decided to do the scientifically responsible thing and re-ran the experiment with all the peer-reviewed commentary in mind. Although we noted with the previous experiment that only alkaline cells were used, [ScuffedBits] rectified this by stating that both carbon and alkaline AA cells were used the first time around.

For this second experiment a number of changes were made, though still both carbon and alkaline cells were put into the mix. To these a third string was added, consisting of NiMH cells, for a total of 64 cells with each of the three strings outputting around 25 VDC when fully charged. These fed a cheap buck regulator module to generate the 12 VDC for the DC-DC converter on the mainboard’s ATX connector.

Although it appears that the same thin Cat-5e-sourced wiring was used, with the higher voltage this meant a lower current, making it significantly less sketchy. Unlike with the first experiment, this time around the Core i3 530 based PC could run much longer and even boot off the DIY battery pack. After a quick game and pushing through a Cinebench run for 64 Watts maximum power usage, it turned out that there was still plenty of time for more fun activities, such as troubleshooting Minecraft and even playing it.

Advertisement

After a total runtime of 33 minutes and 19 seconds the voltage finally dropped too low to continue. A quick check of cells in each string, it turned out that the carbon cells were the most drained with significant terminal voltage drop. The alkaline cells had been pushed down to a level where they could still probably run a wall clock, but the NiMH cells showed a healthy 1.2 V, meaning that a fully NiMH battery pack could go a lot longer.

This probably isn’t too surprising when we look at the history of battery packs in laptops, where NiCd quickly got pushed out by NiMH-based packs for having significantly higher power density and none of the problems with recharging and disposal. Even today 1.5 V Li-ion-based AA cells do not have significantly more capacity than NiMH AA cells, making this chemistry still very relevant today. Even if you’re not trying to build your own battery pack for running a desktop PC off.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Adobe CEO to step down after 18 years as investors question the company's next act

Published

on


Adobe shares fell about 7% in extended trading after the announcement, leaving the stock down roughly 23% so far this year and near a three-year low.
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft launches Copilot Health

Published

on

Microsoft has launched Copilot Health, a dedicated, secure space within its Copilot AI assistant that aggregates personal health data from wearables, electronic health records, and laboratory results, then applies AI to surface what the company calls a “coherent story” of a user’s health.

The product opened its waitlist on 12 March 2026 and is rolling out in phases, initially to English-speaking adults in the United States.

The launch marks Microsoft’s most direct entry into consumer health AI and places it alongside OpenAI, which introduced ChatGPT Health in January 2026, and Anthropic, which unveiled Claude for Healthcare the same month.

In the words of Dominic King, VP of Health at Microsoft AI: “2026 feels like an important year for consumer health.”

Advertisement

He told press briefing attendees that Microsoft’s consumer AI products, Copilot and Bing, already field more than 50 million health-related questions a day.

Copilot Health appears as a dedicated tab in the Copilot web interface and mobile app. Users create a health profile by entering basic details such as age and sex, then optionally connect data sources.

From there, the tool can analyse lab results, interpret wearable readings, surface connections across data streams, and help users prepare questions ahead of clinical appointments.

The data plumbing

Three connectors power the platform’s personal health layer. Wearable data, covering activity levels, sleep patterns, and vital signs, flows in from more than 50 devices, with Apple Health, Oura, and Fitbit cited as examples.

Electronic health records come through HealthEx, a US health data infrastructure provider whose network spans more than 52,000 healthcare organisations via direct FHIR-endpoint exchange, as well as TEFCA individual access services across more than 12,000 organisations. Lab results connect through Function, a venture-backed medical testing provider.

Advertisement

HealthEx confirmed the partnership in a separate press release issued on the same day. The company’s co-founder and CEO, Priyanka Agarwal, M.D., described the integration as giving users access to their health history “across labs, medications, conditions, clinical notes and more” with the ability to revoke access at any time.

Microsoft itself confirmed that users can disconnect any connector instantaneously and that health data in Copilot Health is not used for AI model training, a point the company has repeated prominently in all communications around the product.

For general health information, as opposed to personal data, Microsoft says it has elevated content from credible health organisations across 50 countries, with source selection verified by its clinical team using standards set by the National Academy of Medicine.

Responses include citations and source links. The platform also serves expert-written answer cards from Harvard Health and connects to real-time US provider directories, allowing users to search for clinicians by specialty, location, languages spoken, and insurance coverage.

Advertisement

The AI roadmap: towards ‘medical superintelligence’

Microsoft is framing Copilot Health as a step toward a longer-term goal it describes as “medical superintelligence”, a term the company has been using since at least late 2025. The vision is AI that can combine the breadth of a general physician with the depth of a specialist.

The vehicle most cited for this ambition is the Microsoft AI Diagnostic Orchestrator (MAI-DxO), a research-stage system the company says has produced strong results in clinical evaluation environments.

Microsoft says forthcoming publications will detail how MAI-DxO can be applied across a wider range of cases and conditions. The company states that any new AI features drawing on these research capabilities will only be released into Copilot Health after rigorous clinical evaluation and with clear labelling, a commitment that reads as a regulatory buffer as much as a product design principle.

“We truly believe we’re on the path to medical superintelligence that brings together both the wide-ranging knowledge of a family doctor or general physician as well as the deep domain expertise of a specialist,” said Dominic King, VP of Health, Microsoft AI.

Advertisement

Privacy, governance, and the HIPAA question

Microsoft has been careful on data governance. Copilot Health data and conversations are stored separately from general Copilot interactions, encrypted at rest and in transit, subject to stricter access controls, and not used for model training.

The product has achieved ISO/IEC 42001 certification, the international standard for AI management systems, which requires third-party verification of how an organisation builds, governs, and improves its AI services.

The platform has also been developed with an external advisory panel of more than 230 physicians from more than 24 countries, alongside consumer advocacy organisations including AARP, which serves 38 million older Americans, and the National Health Council, which represents over 180 patient advocacy groups.

However, a significant regulatory caveat emerged during press briefings. King confirmed that Copilot Health is not subject to HIPAA, the US federal law governing the privacy and security of patient health data,  because it operates as a direct-to-consumer service where users are sharing their own data, rather than as a covered healthcare entity.

Advertisement

King said: “HIPAA is not required for a direct-consumer experience like this when you’re using your own data,” while adding that Microsoft intends to announce updates on its HIPAA controls. He declined to specify what those updates would entail.

This distinction matters. HIPAA compliance obligates healthcare organisations to strict data handling, breach notification, and minimum necessary use standards.

Consumer health platforms that fall outside HIPAA, as Copilot Health does at launch, are not subject to the same enforcement regime. The FDA’s relaxation of rules around wearable clinical decision support at the start of 2026 adds further regulatory complexity: it means more AI-enabled health tools can reach consumers without pre-market FDA review.

The clinical reception

Initial expert reaction has been broadly cautious rather than hostile. Arjun Manrai, assistant professor of biomedical informatics at Harvard Medical School, told Healthcare Brew that the approach makes strategic sense, describing the use of personal context in AI health interactions as likely to become a defining trend in 2026. He called helping people prepare for doctor’s appointments a good target for large language models.

Advertisement

Physicians interviewed by the New York Times acknowledged that AI-assisted health tools could help people access health information at a time when care is becoming increasingly expensive and clinicians increasingly stretched.

But the same physicians flagged concerns about privacy risks from sharing records with large technology companies, and the potential for tools like Copilot Health to prompt unnecessary clinical visits by making users anxious about data patterns that may be clinically insignificant.

Microsoft’s standard disclaimer sits at the bottom of every Copilot Health communication: the product is not intended to diagnose, treat, or prevent diseases, and is not a substitute for professional medical advice.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025