Microsoft announced that it removed the Windows Management Instrumentation Command-line (WMIC) tool from Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2, as well as from Windows 11 beta builds released this week.
WMIC is a legacy built-in Windows command-line utility that helps interact with the Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) system using text commands.
This move is part of a process announced in September, when the company said that WMIC will be removed after upgrading to Windows 11 25H2 and later.
Microsoft deprecated WMIC in Windows Server 2012 (in 2016) and Windows 10 21H1 (in 2021), and it converted it into a Feature on Demand (FoD) starting with Windows 11 22H2 (in 2022), and announced in January 2024 that it would be removed altogether after first disabling it by default.
“Windows Management Instrumentation Command-line (WMIC) has been removed in this release. This change is part of the ongoing deprecation and removal of WMIC from Windows,” Microsoft noted on Monday.
Advertisement
Three days earlier, on Friday, it also revealed that the tool is “already removed by default in new installations of Windows 11, versions 24H2 and 25H2, and is no longer available as a Feature on Demand (FoD).”
However, these changes apply only to the legacy WMIC component, as Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) itself remains unaffected. Further guidance for IT administrators who use WMIC is available in this support document, which recommends using PowerShell and other modern tools (e.g., WMI’s COM API, .NET libraries, or scripting languages) for tasks previously done with WMIC.
WMIC’s removal aims to improve the operating system’s overall security by thwarting a wide range of malware and attack tactics that will no longer work.
The tool has long been considered a LOLBIN (living-off-the-land binary), a built-in Microsoft-signed executable that threat actors have abused for a wide range of malicious activities during attacks targeting Windows devices.
alternative_right shares a report from Phys.org: Optical fibers are already the backbone of global communication systems. Recently, however, physicists have started to explore how their functionality could be boosted further by conveying information via entangled quantum particles — potentially enabling instantaneous exchanges of information across vast distances. Such a system could eventually be the basis of a future ‘quantum internet,’ offering a level of security and computing power beyond anything possible today. In new research published in Physical Review Letters, a team led by Xi-Yu Luo at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei has pushed that vision further than ever, entangling two quantum memories across 420 kilometers (261 miles) of optical fiber — more than four times the previous record.
A smartphone that’s modular, easy to repair and more sustainable than competitors? That’s how the Dutch electronics-maker Fairphone markets its latest device, which is now available in the US.
The Fairphone 6 Plus with Android 16, which works on AT&T and T-Mobile’s cell networks and costs $650 through the company’s websiteand on Amazon, comes in cobalt blue, horizon black and forest green.
The 6 Plus is a modest hardware upgrade from the original 6 model released last year. It has a new Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 chip and 12GB of RAM, up from the previous 8GB, but the same 6.31-inch OLED screen, 50MP main camera and 256GB capacity.
The big selling point of Fairphone’s devices is that they are easier to repair and more sustainably built. A screwdriver can be used to swap out 12 parts of the phone, including the display, battery, cameras and SIM tray. The phone has a five-year warranty, and the Android software is supported until 2033, according to its website. Highlighting its sustainability efforts, Fairphone says it is 100% e-waste neutral and that its phones are made with 50% recycled or fair factory-made materials.
Advertisement
Modular for life
Fairphone
Flagship smartphones from top phone-makers, including Apple and Samsung, are typically difficult, if not impossible, for most consumers to repair or replace parts on, and doing so can void product warranties. A cottage industry of repair stores, in addition to repair services that hardware makers offer themselves, can fix problems such as failing batteries or broken screens, but repairs can be costly.
There’s also an environmental component: Having the ability to repair your own device could extend its lifecycle. That’s one of the reasons consumer advocates have pushed for right-to-repair laws in all 50 states.
Gay Gordon-Byrne, executive director of The Repair Association, was pleased to hear the hear that the 6 Plus would be available in the US. “I’m sure there will be a lot of consumer interest and interest in teardowns and evaluations.”
After several decades away from the loudspeaker category, Rotel is getting back into the game with the Amora 5, a passive two-way bass-reflex standmount speaker that marks a significant expansion of the company’s product lineup. Best known for its amplifiers, CD players, DACs, and other source components, Rotel is now extending that system approach all the way to the final link in the chain.
Priced at $999 per pair, the Amora 5 is designed to deliver a wide, open stereo image with low distortion, strong resolution, and a claimed frequency response of 48 Hz to 28 kHz. The compact standmount combines custom drive units, a precision-tuned crossover, and a rigid MDF enclosure, and while Rotel has clearly engineered it to pair naturally with its own electronics, the Amora 5 is intended to work just as comfortably in systems built around competing amplification.
The Tweeter
The 1-inch (25 mm) silk-dome tweeter is mounted within an aluminum surround ring for rigid, secure installation, while a geometrically shaped ABS faceplate minimizes diffraction and provides a smooth transition to the cabinet baffle.
Mid/Bass Driver
The 6.5-inch (165 mm) woven-fiber composite midrange/bass driver incorporates a rigid aluminum frame to maintain mechanical stability and proper driver alignment. This design helps reduce structural vibration while maintaining consistent performance. A 2.5 kHz crossover integrates the tweeter and midrange/bass driver to deliver a balanced frequency response, focused imaging, and an open soundstage.
Advertisement
The Cabinetry
The rigid MDF cabinet provides a stable acoustic foundation for the drive units, helping to minimize unwanted resonance. A rear-mounted bass-reflex port is tuned to extend low-frequency response down to 48 Hz while maintaining controlled bass performance.
Connection Terminals
For connectivity, the Amora includes dual sets of gold-plated speaker terminals that support standard single-wire or bi-wire connection options.
Grille
The included speaker grille uses acoustically transparent fabric to maintain a clean appearance without compromising performance. It attaches magnetically and can be easily removed when desired.
“Rotel’s success has always been built on trusted engineering, long-term relationships, and a shared passion for music,” said Peter Kao, Managing Director of Rotel and third-generation member of the founding family. “With the Amora 5, we extend the Rotel experience through the final stage of the system, giving our global partners and customers a more complete path from source to speaker.”
Rotel Amora 5 Speaker Specifications
Rotel Model
Amora 5
Product Type
Passive Bookshelf/Standmount Speaker
Price (MSRP)
$999 / €999 / £999 per pair
Design
2-way bass-reflex loudspeaker
Drive units
1 x 25 mm (1 in) silk dome tweeter 1 x 165 mm (6.5 in) woven fibre composite midrange/bass
Rotel is making an interesting move. After more than three decades away from the loudspeaker category, a company best known for amplifiers, CD players, DACs, and other electronics is getting back into the game with a single model rather than launching an entire speaker family.
That may be the most interesting thing about the Amora 5. There is nothing particularly exotic about its two-way architecture, 6.5-inch woven-fiber midrange/bass driver, silk-dome tweeter, or rear-ported MDF enclosure. Instead, Rotel appears to be taking a relatively conservative approach with a $999/pair standmount designed to complement the electronics it already sells.
The problem is that $1,000 is one of the most competitive price points in the loudspeaker market. The QUAD Elegan 1 sells for $995/pair, while the newly introduced Wharfedale Denton 1S is $999/pair and the Q Acoustics 5020 is also currently $999/pair.
Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
There are also less expensive alternatives that could make the decision even more difficult. The KEF Q3 Meta is $899.99/pair, the larger Q Acoustics 3030c is $799/pair, and Triangle’s Borea BR04 is $625/pair.
Rotel’s biggest advantage might therefore be the name on the front rather than any revolutionary piece of loudspeaker technology. Existing Rotel owners now have the option of building a complete system from a familiar brand, and dealers could make the Amora 5 more compelling by pairing it with integrated amplifiers such as the DX-5 or A8.
Returning to loudspeakers after more than 30 years will certainly get Rotel some attention. Convincing buyers to choose the Amora 5 over some very established competition at the same price will be the harder part.
Advertisement
Price & Availability
The Rotel Amora 5 bookshelf (stand-mount) speakers will be available for $999/pair ( €999 / £999) in matte black or matte white through authorized Rotel dealers in August 2026.
On Tuesday, OpenAI announced a new batch of security policies focused on containing security incidents while models are being tested. The new safeguards include more detailed monitoring of models during the development process, as well as greater emphasis on alignment and security during the post-training process.
“As models become more capable, the risks associated with developing and testing them internally also grow,” the company said in a blog post. “Our standards for monitoring, alignment, and security must stay ahead of those risks.”
The new measures are one of the first public changes in OpenAI’s safety practices since the immediate aftermath of the Hugging Face incident, which was disclosed on July 21.
OpenAI representatives said that the measures are not a direct response to the Hugging Face incident but were also provoked in part by the cybersecurity capabilities of the forthcoming Astra model, as well as the overall pace of progress in AI development.
Advertisement
In the same post, OpenAI disclosed that it had paused reinforcement learning (RL) for two weeks following the Hugging Face incident but had since restarted many of the less-risky models.
“Our largest planned frontier RL run remains on hold while we conduct smaller-scale training and evaluations to assess model behavior, validate our safeguards, and establish more evidence of alignment before proceeding,” the post reads.
Speaking to reporters, OpenAI’s VP of research, Amelia Glaese, emphasized that the strictness of the controls would increase as models became more capable, with the largest models facing the greatest scrutiny.
“We have put in place requirements and expectations for safe development,” Glaese told reporters. “Those requirements and expectations vary with the level of risk that we see.”
Advertisement
OpenAI has been criticized for poor network security practices in the wake of the incident, which saw models escape their training environment by compromising a tool on its network that had access to the internet. The new safeguards include stronger network isolation practices, although the specifics remain vague. Under the new system, the post says, “a single compromise of a workload or supporting service does not, by itself, allow for unauthorized access to the Internet, or other internal networks.”
The strongest safeguard is the monitoring system, which will examine tool actions, available reasoning traces, and activity logs for a variety of unauthorized behavior. OpenAI says it aims to issue alerts within 30 minutes of the concerning activity.
OpenAI estimates that the compute burden of that monitoring will be roughly 20% of whatever process is being monitored. The company promised further details on the system in a forthcoming blog post. The company’s official postmortem analysis of the event is also still pending.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Hertility’s research conducted the ‘largest study ever undertaken’ in this area, across five years.
Hertility, an Irish-founded UK and Irish healthcare provider for women, has today (19 August) published the “largest study ever undertaken” in the region on female testosterone levels.
Published in the Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, Hertility assessed data from 30,453 women aged between 18 and 74 who accessed at-home hormone testing in England, Scotland and Wales between September 2020 and August 2025.
What was discovered is that hormone levels decline progressively throughout adult life, falling by approximately 1.4pc each year from a woman’s 20s onwards, with no abrupt perimenopausal cliff edge, which is the term often used to describe the sudden, ‘cliff-like’ drop in hormones.
Advertisement
Testosterone plays a crucial role in many of the body’s functions, such as libido, mood, bone mineral density, muscle mass and metabolic function and also forms part of the assessment of conditions including PMO and androgen deficiency. However, the data has thus far not kept pace with developments.
Currently, in both Ireland and the UK testosterone is typically measured using the immunoassay method. The ‘normal’ ranges that inform the tests are frequently based on just two small validation studies which took data from only 149 women across two broad age ranges 20 to 49 and the over 50s.
Additionally, that cohort was screened only for BMI and hormonal contraceptive use and it failed to exclude hirsutism, which is excessive hair growth, PMOS, which is formerly PCOS and other markers of androgen excess.
As a result, the research found that the dependence on arguably outdated data means “some women are still being falsely reassured and others investigated unnecessarily after their testosterone levels are tested.”
Advertisement
Failing averages
The report suggested that tests based on averages are failing women, particularly when it is shown that testosterone variation widens with age.
Consider for a moment a woman of 25, within a bracket of 19 to 59 years olds, whose results may be regarded as normal, but who may have a counterpart whose results are flagged as abnormal and investigated because she is being compared against a system that was not designed to reflect her age.
The report noted, “genuine hormonal disruption is masked as being ‘normal’ while normal physiology is escalated as abnormal and both outcomes contribute to the diagnostic delays that continue to characterise women’s health.
“Instead of using a single cut-off point, the researchers modelled where testosterone levels typically fall at every single year of age. This means a woman’s result can be shown as its precise position within the normal range for her age, providing one piece of evidence to be weighed alongside her symptoms, cycle history, medication use and a clinical examination.”
Advertisement
Hertility’s report is calling on clinical laboratories, assay manufacturers and guideline bodies to use age-specific, age-continuous hormone ranges rather than a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to women’s health. They should also aim to share the criteria that formed the basis of their study so clinicians can make an informed decision.
Commenting on the report, Dr Helen O’Neill, the CEO of Hertility and associate professor in reproductive and molecular genetics at UCL, said, “When a woman has a hormone test, she is looking for an answer about her own body.
“What she receives is a comparison against an average and too often an average drawn from a few dozen women, decades ago, grouped into age brackets so broad they are almost meaningless.
“Averages are not neutral, they flatten the range of normal human variation, masking real hormonal disruption in some women while manufacturing false alarm in others.
Advertisement
“Precision medicine requires reference data of sufficient scale and rigour that an individual can be interpreted as an individual. Better reference ranges will never replace clinical judgement, but they change what clinical judgement has to work with, and set a standard for what should be expected before any hormone result is described as normal or abnormal for a woman.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
As popular as the Nintendo Switch and its sequel are, it’s hard to argue that its click-on Joy-Con controllers are ergonomic, barring you having very uniquely shaped hands. This thought and a stack of Wii controllers led [KOUZEX] to the mad project of merging Joy-Cons and WiiMotes into what can affectionately be called Wii-Cons, or perhaps JoyMotes.
Suffice it to say that it’s not a very clean or easy mod, and you could definitely make the point that a custom PCB and 3D-printed shell would have been a lot easier. Making space for the Joy-Con’s side rail, thumb stick and PCB without simply tossing the WiiMote’s PCB was a tough ask, and these are two WiiMotes that will never connect to a Wii again.
With the WiiMote-shaped Joy-Cons working pretty well after all that work, the issue of remapping Joy-Con buttons that have no match on WiiMotes was probably the biggest headache. Here having said custom version could be rather helpful to have more control over the button layout, also to not have to keep harvesting the dwindling supply of WiiMotes to make WiiCons. It might even be possible to keep all the WiiMote functionality that way, to really blow people’s minds when you use your fancy Joy-Cons to next play a game on an original Wii.
Watch England vs Pakistan live streams as the 1st Test from Headingley, Leeds, begins a three-match series full of intrigue. Joe Root returns as England captain as the backlash from the hosts previous series continues, while Babar Azam’s visitors seek a rare away series victory.
“Bazball” is finally over, with coach Brendon McCullum let go from the Test gig days after Ben Stokes announced a shock international retirement after England’s 2-1 defeat by New Zealand in June. Stephen Fleming, another Kiwi, doesn’t take the reins as the new Test coach until the winter so Marcus Trescothick is in interim coaching charge here.
Root’s return as skipper – having resigned in 2022 after 27 wins in 64 Tests with the job weighing too heavily – is largely down to a distinct lack of alternatives. After all, Harry Brook, vice-captain under Stokes and the white-ball skipper, has had notorious incidents similar to that which precipitated Stokes’ exit. Wins over entertainment appears the new mantra.
Advertisement
England must trim their in-form bowling unit of Jofra Archer, Gus Atkinson, Josh Tongue, Ollie Robinson and the returning Brydon Carse, while working out how to deal with the loss of their principal all-rounder in Stokes. Jordan Cox will bat at three in absence of the injured Jacob Bethell.
Pakistan, meanwhile, are coming off a hard-fought victory in their tour game against a Professional County Club Select XI. Despite trailing by 67 in the first innings, they won the match, chasing 264 on the last day thanks to Saud Shakeel’s unbeaten century. But they’re currently 7th in the ICC’s Test rankings and have only just won their first away Test – in West Indies – after three long years.
New-ball bowler Mohammad Abbas is ideally suited to English conditions, with Mohammad Ali, Khurram Shahzad, and Aamer Jamal to maintain their bite through the series. Abbas faces a late fitness test after injuring a finger in that warm-up game.
Pakistan won the last Test series against England 2-1, albeit in home conditions. Can they start this overseas series well with a win?
Advertisement
You can catch all the England vs Pakistan 1st Test action live and free. Read on to find out how.
Can I stream England vs Pakistan 1st Test for free?
Cricket fans in Pakistan are in luck!
Digital streaming service Tapmad is showing the England vs Pakistan test series completely free, albeit with ads playing during over breaks and fall of wickets.
Those still tied to the cord can also watch the match free in Pakistan, thanks to the PTV Sports TV channel.
Advertisement
Cord-cutters in Australia, meanwhile, have a sneaky trick they can use to watch the Test match live: Kayo Sports offers a 7-day free trial to new users, letting you catch all five days of action live and free.
Outside any of these countries right now? No worries, you can still stream the action by using a VPN. More details below…
Use a VPN to watch England vs Pakistan 1st Test from anywhere
If you’re keen to watch cricket but you’re away from home and your preferred coverage is geo-blocked, you could always use a VPN to access it (assuming you’re not breaching any broadcaster T&Cs, of course). You may be surprised by how simple it is to do.
Advertisement
The best VPN right now? We recommend NordVPN – it does everything and comes with a 75% discount, and three months for free.
Quick start: Using a VPN to watch the 1st Test between England and Pakistan from anywhere
Using a VPN is incredibly simple, just follow these steps.
1. Install the VPN of your choice. As we’ve said, NordVPN is our favorite.
Advertisement
2. Choose the location you wish to connect to in the VPN app. For instance if you’re visiting the U.S. and want to view a Pakistani streaming service, you’d select a location from Pakistan (like Karachi) from the server list.
3. Sit back and enjoy the action. Head to Tampad and watch England vs Pakistan 1st Test just like you would at home.
How to watch England vs Pakistan 1st Test live streams in the US
(Image credit: Other)
Cricket streaming service Willow TV is the place to watch the England vs Pakistan 1st Test in the US.
Advertisement
If you don’t have it as part of your cable package, you can watch Willow coverage through your choice of Sling TV’s Desi Binge Plus or Dakshin Flex plans – starting from $10 per month.
Alternatively, you can add Willow TV to your Prime Video subscription and watch cricket live streams from there.
Outside the US right now? You can make use of NordVPN to catch the action.
Advertisement
How to watch England vs Pakistan 1st Test live streams in the UK
The England vs Pakistan 1st Test is being shown on Sky Sports on the Cricket and Main Event channels.
Sky Sports plans start from £35/month or £22 if you’re an existing Sky subscriber. Alternatively, grab a NOW Sports subscription from £14.99/day or £34.99/month.
If you’re on holiday outside the UK, you can use NordVPN to access Eng vs Pak coverage.
Advertisement
How to watch England vs Pakistan 1st Test live streams in India
(Image credit: Wikimedia Commons)
Unfortunately for cricket fans in India, the England vs Pakistan 1st Test hasn’t yet been picked up by any streaming service. We’ll update you here if that changes!
If you’re currently travling in India but want to watch the matches live, you’ll need to get yourself a VPN to access streaming services back home.
How to watch England vs Pakistan 1st Test live streams in Australia
(Image credit: free)
The England vs Pakistan Test series is being shown on Fox Cricket via Foxtel in Australia, with live streaming available via Kayo Sports.
Advertisement
Kayo Sports starts at AU$30 per month after a 7-day free trial. Or you can get your first month for AU$1.
Remember if you’re out of Australia at all during the match, get NordVPN to stream Eng vs Pak from anywhere in the world.
How to watch England vs Pakistan 1st Test live streams in Pakistan
In India, England vs Pakistan First Test is free-to-air on PTV Sports (TV) and on Tapmad for cord-cutters.
Advertisement
That said, the free tier on Tapmad will have a lower-quality stream with ads playing during over breaks and fall of wickets. There’s a premium tier, too, at PKR 499 per month, which unlocks an ad-free, high-definition (HD) stream.
If you’re currently out of Pakistan but want to watch an England vs Pakistan 1st Test live stream, you’ll need to get yourself a VPN, as per the instructions above.
England vs Pakistan 1st Test Q+A
Advertisement
Squads
England: Joe Root (c), Jamie Smith (wk), Harry Brook, Jordan Cox, Ben Duckett, Emilio Gay, Dan Lawrence, Ollie Pope, Brydon Carse, Jofra Archer, Gus Atkinson, Sam Cook, Matthew Fisher, Ollie Robinson, Shoaib Bashir, Josh Tongue.
Pakistan: Babar Azam (c), Mohammad Rizwan (wk), Ghazi Ghori (wk), Awais Zafar, Azan Awais, Imam-ul-Haq, Shan Masood, Abdullah Fazal, Aamer Jamel, Salman Ali Agha, Khurram Shahzad, Mohammad Abbas, Mohammad Ali, Sajid Khan, Ubaid Shah, Ali Usman
England vs Pakistan Test series schedule
1st Test: 19-23 August, Headingley (11am BST)
Advertisement
2nd Test: 27-31 August, Lord’s (11am BST)
3rd Test: 9-13 September, Edgbaston (11am BST)
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
As the resident NBN and home-internet expert for TechRadar Australia, I spend much of my time looking out for the best internet deals, and there are almost invariably a number of compelling options at every different speed tier — and these can be a great way to sense-check if you’re overpaying for your current NBN service.
When choosing deals, much of my decision-making revolves around two easily identifiable metrics: price and typical evening speed (TES). Typical evening speed is something all internet service providers (ISPs) have to disclose before you sign up for a plan. In essence, it tells you the download speed you can realistically expect to achieve during the busier evening hours of 7pm to 11pm. Being able to view the TES also means you can easily identify which ISPs ultimately offer better value — i.e. the ones advertising fast evening speeds at competitively low prices.
With almost all of the best NBN 500 plans promising to deliver their maximum 500Mbps speeds even during the peak evening period, it’s a tier where direct price comparisons make sense. However, things get a bit wobblier when you’re shopping for faster speeds, such as NBN 750 and NBN 1000.
Advertisement
Most plans on these tiers make more conservative promises when it comes to typical evening speed — for example, rather than the 1,000Mbps you might expect from NBN 1000, on these gigabit plans, most providers only promise evening speeds in the 820-860Mbps range. With that TES figure closer to 750Mbps than 1,000Mbps, it prompted me to ask a simple question: Is NBN 1000 actually worth it, or should you save yourself some moolah every month and opt for NBN 750 instead?
Cue a whole load of number crunching!
So average
First, I calculated the current average monthly cost of NBN 750 and NBN 1000 plans, alongside the average TES advertised by the providers I monitor. After crunching the numbers on NBN 750 plans from 14 providers and NBN 1000 plans from 20, the final results were:
Advertisement
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Measure
NBN 750
NBN 1000
Average price
Advertisement
AU$105.98
AU$114.95
Average TES
730.2 Mbps
Advertisement
835.4 Mbps
As expected, the results show that NBN 1000 plans do not, on average, get as close to their nominal 1,000 Mbps tier speed as NBN 750 plans get to 750 Mbps. The gigabit gap was quite substantial, falling 164.6Mbps shy of the tier’s nominal 1,000 Mbps tier, compared to a shortfall of just 19.8 Mbps for NBN 750.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
With the average monthly cost less than AU$10 difference between the two tiers — specifically AU$8.97, or 8.5% — the question then became whether the NBN 1000’s typical evening speeds are worth it from a value perspective. For that, we of course needed to do some more maths:
Advertisement
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Measure
NBN 750
NBN 1000
Shortfall from theoretical maximum
Advertisement
19.8 Mbps
164.6 Mbps
TES as share of maximum
97.36%
Advertisement
83.54%
Cost per advertised TES Mbps
14.5 cents
13.8 cents
Advertisement
Next steps
With NBN 1000 plans falling far short of 1,000Mbps in their typical evening speed promises (averaging just 83.5%), intuitively they seemed like they’d come out second fiddle to NBN 750. Surprisingly, however, NBN 1000 is slightly ahead when comparing cost per megabit for typical evening speeds: 13.8 cents for NBN 1000 versus 14.5 cents for NBN 750. There are a couple of NBN 750 plans that come in below that average at 13 cents per megabit — Kogan Internet and Spintel — which I’ve listed below.
In other words, NBN 1000 might cost more in absolute terms, but it does offer slightly better value per advertised megabit. If you need some recommendations as to which NBN 1000 plans are worth checking out, look no further than Dodo and Superloop. The cost per megabit on these two works out to be 13 cents, placing them among the cheapest for the tier.
Advertisement
Is there a third option?
The NBN 750 and 1000 plans don’t exist in a vacuum, however, and NBN Co has been pretty clear that it considers NBN 500 — introduced last September — to be the current sweet spot for most Australian households. So how does the golden child stack up, you ask? I’ve also made it no secret that I consider it the best option for most Australian households, but admittedly, that’s been without these recent calculations.
As we alluded to above, unlike NBN 750 and 1000 plans, most providers do advertise maximum plan speeds for NBN 500, with an average typical evening speed of 499.3 Mbps across 22 providers — equivalent to 99.9% of its potential 500 Mbps maximum.
On a cost-per-megabit basis, however, things don’t look as pretty for my personal fave. With an average monthly price of AU$95.75, the average megabit cost works out to around 19.2 cents, making it substantially more expensive than both NBN 750 and NBN 1000.
With that being said, it still remains the cheapest option in outright monthly terms, with the average NBN 500 plan costing AU$95.75 — AU$10.23 less than NBN 750 and AU$19.20 less than NBN 1000.
Advertisement
As for my top recommendations for an NBN 500 plan, look no further.
Decisions, decisions
So, where to go from here? What these numbers helpfully confirm is that if you do opt for a faster plan, you are getting good value from a purely cost-per-megabit metric — so if you were looking to justify jumping up to NBN 750 or NBN 1000, you can probably stop reading here.
These facts and figures can’t take into account all the subjective-but-important real-world factors that come into play when choosing an internet plan — they can’t, for example, help you determine how much speed your household actually needs.
Advertisement
While it’s now been proven that NBN 1000 plans offer the cheapest cost-per-megabit, that’s only really useful if you actually need gigabit speeds regularly. What you’re ultimately paying extra for, most of the time, is time — specifically, less time waiting for large files (like video games or OS updates) to download.
For me personally, I’ve decided I can stand to wait a little longer on the one or two occasions a month when that extra speed would be noticeable. It’s hard to justify paying more if the extra megabits are going unused 95% or more of the time.
The creator of Deus Ex, the action role-playing game franchise originally developed by Ion Storm, has announced his retirement. In a LinkedIn post, Warren Spector said he was a month away from his 44th year as a developer and had worked on tabletop games, 17 digital games, ran small and large teams and helped people with their careers. Now, his age and health are catching up with him, and it was time to “write some books, do a lot of reading, do some lecturing, maybe do some consulting.”
Spector also said that there are still three games he would like to make, but that the business has changed and it’s not as fun for him anymore. While he admitted that he tried to retire in the past but changed his tune, he said he thinks he means it this time. He is typically regarded as a founding father of immersive sim games, characterized by giving players the freedom to solve problems in a variety of ways.
On Deus Ex, wherein you play an anti-terrorism agent in a dystopian cyberpunk setting, Spector also served as director and producer. He worked on several Ultima titles as producer and writer, as well as on Disney’s Epic Mickey for the Wii as director. His latest game was Thick As Thieves, a stealth-action heist game, released just a few months ago. He also worked on System Shock 3, but Tencent took over that project and its status remains unclear.
It seems like Nvidia’s not getting back into the Middle Kingdom anytime soon
Chinese web giant Baidu yesterday told investors it sees good days ahead for its Kunlunxin chip biz, because local buyers won’t have alternatives.
Baidu has previously said it plans to spin out and float Kunlunxin, which makes CUDA-compliant inferencing chips that it uses for its own cloud services and has sold to the likes of Huawei and ZTE, who use them in kit they sell to Chinese telcos.
Advertisement
Speaking on the company’s Q2 earnings call, Dou Shen, executive veep of Baidu’s AI Cloud Group, said Baidu is working to list Kunlunxin and will have concrete info to share soon.
“From a business perspective, we remain very confident in Kunlunxin’s long-term growth and commercial potential for a few reasons,” he said. One of those reasons is that demand for inferencing continues to rise, and Baidu thinks that trend will continue for the long term.
His second reason was that China’s domestic market has “significant growth potential” because supply of AI chips is “likely to remain constrained for some time.”
“Against this backdrop, customers are increasingly seeking high performance, reliable, and cost-efficient domestic AI chips.”
Advertisement
Those remarks are notable in the context of the US government’s policy to allow Nvidia to resume sales of its products into China, and Beijing’s response of giving itself a veto over any purchases by local companies.
After Washington banned Nvidia from selling its products in China, the company said that decision cost it $10.5 billion in six months. In its most recent results announcement the GPU giant said it had not won any revenue in China after the USA’s policy reversal, and is “uncertain whether any imports will be allowed into the country.”
And now Baidu is saying Chinese buyers are looking to local chips due to supply challenges.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has argued that the Trump administration should encourage chip sales to China, to cement the USA’s dominance of AI. Beijing has encouraged adoption of local tech, in part to reduce dependence on US products.
Advertisement
Baidu’s earnings included strong growth for its AI business, which saw revenue from cloud infrastructure rental rise 50 percent year over year to almost $1.1 billion, and revenue from the company’s GPU cloud surge 283 percent year-over-year, trumping the 184 percent growth in the last quarter.
Those numbers are modest compared to the likes of AWS, Google, and Microsoft – and also a fair way down the charts among Baidu’s Chinese competitors. The company believes owning its own stack of models, infrastructure, and chips will mean it can deliver AI services at keen prices and give it a market advantage. Alibaba makes similar claims and is arguably far ahead of Baidu in terms of model-making capabilities.
But Baidu has the robo-cab field to itself with the Apollo Go service, which execs said provided over one million fully autonomous rides around the world in Q2.
Back on the web, execs enthused about low hallucination rates for the company’s consumer-AI services, and an 83 percent year-over-year increase in the number of daily active users for Baidu’s ERNIE assistant – which saw the number of conversations users stage daily more than triple.
Advertisement
Overall revenue grew just four percent year-over-year to $3.9 billion, meaning Baidu’s AI cloud is the company’s growth engine. ®
You must be logged in to post a comment Login