RingConn has launched its latest smart ring, and it’s going straight after Samsung with one standout claim: battery life that’s double that of the Galaxy Ring.

The new RingConn Gen 3 lasts up to 14 days on a single charge (with the caveat that haptics are turned off) compared to the seven-day estimate on Samsung’s Galaxy Ring. That alone makes it one of the longer-lasting smart rings currently on the market, and appeals to users who don’t want another device to charge every few days.

Battery aside, RingConn is also leaning further into health tracking. The Gen 3 focuses on vascular health insights, alongside features like sleep tracking and sleep apnea monitoring. There’s also a planned blood pressure tracking feature, but it’s not available at launch and will instead arrive in a future update. As expected, it’s positioned as a trend-tracking tool rather than a medical-grade replacement.

The ultra high-end loudspeaker category has been rather busy in 2026, which is either a sign that the market still has serious money to spend or that nobody in this business knows how to tap the brakes. Wilson Audio has already made a very large statement with the $788,000 per pair Autobiography, while Børresen’s M8 Gold Signature pushes the conversation into seven figure territory. Now YG Acoustics has entered the same rarefied air with Titan, the first model in its new flagship Ultimate Range and arguably the most talked about new loudspeaker at AXPONA 2026.

This is not a speaker aimed at the casually curious. Titan is YG’s attempt to plant a flag at the top of the mountain, where the air is thin, the rooms are large, and your bank account needs to barely flinch when the invoice is opened.

Attack of the Titans?

Five years of research and three years of product development later, YG Acoustics has arrived at Titan, the most ambitious loudspeaker the company has released to date. It is the first model in YG’s new Ultimate Range and is designed to showcase the brand’s latest engineering work while pushing further into the ultra high end loudspeaker category.

Titan is not trying to disappear visually. It stands approximately 7 feet tall, or 84.5 inches, and weighs about 1,000 pounds. That is half a ton before the crates, the room treatment, and the quiet conversation with your financial advisor. Inside the cabinet, YG uses a seven driver symmetrical array supported by a custom designed sub bass driver.

YG Acoustics Titan Versions & Pricing

YG Acoustics offers the Titan in three configurations, giving ultra high-end buyers some room to choose between passive operation, active sub bass support, and a fully active system. “Some room” being relative when the starting point is $880,000 per pair.

Titan Passive: $880,000 per pair

The Titan Passive is a fully passive five-way loudspeaker that uses an external crossover with YG Acoustics’ Ultracoherent circuits. Crossover points are specified at 35 Hz, 90 Hz, 360 Hz, and 1.85 kHz.

Titan with Active Sub: $910,000 per pair

The Titan with Active Sub uses a passive four-way system with an external crossover and Ultracoherent circuits at 90 Hz, 360 Hz, and 1.85 kHz. Sub-bass duties are handled by a dedicated external 1,000-watt amplifier with DSP tuned crossover control for the 12.5-inch (32 cm) driver, including room correction support. The active sub-bass section is time aligned to integrate with the passive drivers.

Titan Live: $1,000,000 per pair

The Titan Live is the fully integrated active version of YG Acoustics Titan. It includes dedicated amplification and DSP for each channel, covering the high, midrange, low, and sub bass sections. Each tower is partnered with an external amplifier using 8 x 700-watts with an optimized DSP crossover.

The system connects to the Live Controller using glass fiber optic cables, with support for Roon Ready streaming, analog and digital inputs, and a high quality phono stage. In other words, this is the version for buyers who want the full YG ecosystem, not just a pair of loudspeakers and a nervous conversation with their amplifier dealer.

The Drivers

High frequencies are handled by YG’s lattice tweeter set inside a unique oval waveguide flanked by proprietary YG aluminum cone drivers arranged symmetrically above and below it: a pair of 15 cm (6-inch) mid-range drivers, a pair of 18 cm (7.25-inch) mid-bass drivers, and a pair of 26 cm (10.25-inch) bass drivers.

The tweeter, midrange, mid-bass, and bass array is supported by a custom 32 cm (12.5 inch) YG aluminum cone sub bass driver with an ultra high field magnet structure. YG says each driver is phase aligned across a wide frequency range to support a point source presentation.

The goal is improved clarity, more precise imaging, and a wider listening area. That matters with a loudspeaker this large, because nobody spending this kind of money wants to sit with their head locked in one exact spot like they are being scanned for replicant behavior.

More details are included in the specifications chart later in the article.

Driver array includes:

• One 26 mm (1”) Tweeter: Proprietary YG Lattice hybrid construction
• Dual 15 cm (6 inch) midrange drivers: Proprietary YG aluminum cone drivers with neodymium magnets and close pair matching.
• Dual 18.5 cm (7.25 inch) midbass drivers: Proprietary YG aluminum cone drivers with neodymium magnets and close pair matching.
• Dual 26 cm (10.25 inch) bass drivers: Proprietary YG aluminum cone drivers with ultra high field magnets and close pair matching.
• 32 cm (12.5 inch) sub bass driver: Proprietary YG aluminum cone driver with an ultra high field magnet and close matching.

Cabinet Construction

The Titan cabinet uses a five layer construction, another example of YG Acoustics’ focus on structural rigidity, resonance control, and fit and finish.

The side panels use three layers of aerospace grade aluminum alloy, with precision engineered damping materials between them. That creates the five layer structure and gives the cabinet additional stiffness without relying on brute mass alone.

The front faceplates are machined from solid aerospace grade aluminum measuring 75 mm, or 3 inches, thick. YG says the aluminum is heat treated to optimize its crystalline structure before being milled to extremely tight tolerances.

Inside the cabinet, Titan uses advanced bracing, composite resin damping, and computationally optimized diffuser and absorber structures to reduce internal resonances and help the drivers operate with fewer cabinet related distortions.

In addition, the subwoofer section at the bottom maximizes cabinet volume by tapping into a channel that runs up the entire back of the Titan.

The Passive Crossover

The passive crossover is the result of the art and science of speaker engineering. The crossover is built on bespoke multi-layer PCB material with advanced dielectric properties and internal resonance damping.

Each crossover circuit is precisely milled in-house from extra-thick, high-purity copper, with traces optimized through simulation to eliminate interference and distortion. The crossover is housed externally in an enclosure crafted entirely from a specially selected polymer material. The external placement eliminates any field interactions with the crossover signal.

YG Acoustics Titan Specifications

The Bottom Line 

The YG Acoustics Titan is not just the first model in the company’s new Ultimate Range. It is YG’s statement that it wants a seat at the same very expensive table as the Wilson Audio Autobiography, Børresen M8 Gold Signature, and Sonus faber Suprema. That table does not come with a kids’ menu.

What makes Titan interesting is not one single trick feature, but the complete system approach: a massive seven driver symmetrical array, dedicated 12.5-inch sub bass driver, five layer cabinet construction, phase aligned driver integration, and three available configurations: passive, active sub bass, and fully active Titan Live. That flexibility is unusual for a loudspeaker at this level, especially when buyers can choose between traditional external amplification, active low frequency support, or a complete YG controlled ecosystem with amplification, DSP, streaming, digital inputs, analog inputs, and a phono stage.

Prospective buyers need to think beyond the loudspeaker price. The passive and active sub versions still require serious amplification, sources, cabling, setup expertise, and a room large enough to let a 7 foot tall, 1,000 pound loudspeaker breathe. With output extending below 20 Hz and up to 40 kHz, a 4 ohm average impedance, and a 2.4 ohm minimum load, Titan is not something you casually drop into a living room next to the sectional and hope for the best. It needs space, power, proper setup, and a system built around it.

Titan is aimed at listeners who already understand the cost of entry in the ultra high-end category and want YG’s most ambitious expression of scale, control, and engineering. Everyone else can admire it from a safe distance, preferably outside the freight elevator.

Price & Availability

YG Acoustics Titan (aluminum version) is available now through Authorized Dealers in three configurations:

• Titan Passive – $880,000 per pair
• Titan w/Active Sub – $910,000 per pair
• Titan Live – $1,000,000 per pair

A gold version is also available for roughly $2 million per pair, depending on market pricing and thickness of gold plating.

Sound Clip from AXPONA 2026

For more information: yg-acoustics.com

Related Reading:

• 15,500 domains were actively used to deliver cloaked AI investment scams
• Cloaking ensures harmful content is shown only to targeted victims
• Commercial tracking software allows cybercriminals to scale operations without building infrastructure

Cloaking has shifted from a supporting tactic into a central layer of cybercriminal infrastructure, and commercial tools are now widely embedded in cybercrime operations at scale.

A four-month analysis of malicious activity by Infoblox and Confiant identified roughly 15,500 domains linked to malicious tracker deployments.

Billionaire media mogul Barry Diller doesn’t think OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is untrustworthy, despite recent reporting to the contrary. Onstage at The Wall Street Journal’s “Future of Everything” conference this week, Diller vouched for the AI exec, who has been accused by some former colleagues and board members of being manipulative and deceptive at times.

Diller, who is friendly with Altman, was responding to a question about whether or not people should put their faith in Altman to ensure that artificial intelligence benefits humanity.

In particular, he was asked about the theoretical form of AI known as artificial general intelligence, or AGI, which could one day outperform humans on any task.

The media exec, a co-founder of Fox Broadcasting and chairman of IAC and Expedia Group, said that while he believes Altman is sincere in his pursuits, that’s not really the area of concern people should be focused on. Rather, it’s the unknown consequences that will result from AI.

“One of the big issues with AI is it goes way beyond trust,” Diller said. “It may be that trust is irrelevant because the things that are happening are a surprise to the people who are making those things happen. And I’ve spent a lot of time with various people who’ve been in the creation mode of AI, and they have a sense of wonder themselves. So…it’s the great unknown. We don’t know. They don’t know,” he explained.

“We have embarked on something that is going to change almost everything. It is not under-reported. Now, whether these huge investments are going to come through — I couldn’t care less. I’m not invested in it, but progress is going to be made,” Diller added.

Still, the media mogul said he believes that most of the people leading the charge are good stewards, saying he believes that Altman is sincere and “a decent person with good values.” (Diller wouldn’t say which of the AI leaders he thinks is insincere, we should note.)

“But the issue is not their stewardship. The issue is … it’s dealing truly with the unknown. They don’t know what can happen once you get AGI, and we’re close to it. We’re not there yet, but we’re getting closer and closer, quicker and quicker. And we must think about guardrails,” Diller noted.

Plus, he warned, if humans don’t think about guardrails, then the alternative is that “another force, an AGI force, will do it themselves. And once that happens, once you unleash that, there’s no going back,” Diller said.

Meta is beefing up its age-verification mechanisms with an AI system that analyzes images and videos on Instagram and Facebook for “visual cues,” such as height and bone structure, to identify and delete accounts of users under the age of 13. The company announced the move amid a wave of cases in which hundreds of children have managed to evade social network access restrictions, even through simple tricks such as drawing on a mustache.

The new approach is part of a series of measures Meta adopted as part of an AI-based security strategy designed to correct the limitations of traditional methods, which rely heavily on self-reported age. With this change, the company seeks to reduce the ease with which minors access platforms that, in theory, are restricted to them.

In a press release, Meta explained that it is implementing several tools to identify contextual indicators that allow estimating a person’s age. This process includes the analysis of posts, comments, bios, and descriptions, with special attention to references related to school years or birthday celebrations—elements that can offer clues about the real age of the person who manages the account.

These tools are in addition to automated analysis techniques aimed at detecting physical traits from imagery shared to Meta’s social platforms. These include characteristics such as height and bone structure. Meta is careful to stipulate that this system is not face recognition, as it does not seek to identify specific individuals in images or videos. Instead, the company notes that, “by combining these visual insights with our analysis of text and interactions, we can significantly increase the number of underage accounts we identify and remove.”

If, based on these elements, Meta suspects that an account is managed by a child under 13, it will be suspended. The user will have to revalidate their age using the procedures established by the company to regain access; otherwise, the profile will be permanently deleted.

Meta also announced that it will expand the scope of its technology to detect users between the ages of 13 and 15 and automatically assign them teen accounts. This type of profile incorporates content restrictions and parental controls enabled by default, with the aim of providing a safer environment for this age group.

Meta began implementing age-verification tech in 2024 for Instagram users in the United States, Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Now, the mechanism will be extended to Instagram accounts in Brazil and 27 European Union countries. In addition, these practices will be applied for the first time to Facebook users in the US, with plans to expand to the EU and UK next month.

Looking All Grown-Up

The new measures have been interpreted as a response to a preliminary ruling recently issued by the European Commission, which concluded that the company led by Mark Zuckerberg is in breach of the Digital Services Act for allegedly failing to effectively prevent children under 13 from using its platforms. The EU body found that the company lacks sufficiently effective mechanisms to block such access and that its current systems for identifying and suspending accounts below the age threshold are insufficient.

These criticisms are supported by the results of a survey conducted by the nonprofit Internet Matters. After surveying nearly 1,300 children and their parents in the UK, the study revealed that approximately one-third of children have successfully evaded government-imposed restrictions on access to social networking sites. In some cases, the methods employed are particularly striking.

The report, titled “The Online Safety Act: Are Children Safe Online?” showed that 46 percent of 9- to 16-year-olds believe that circumventing age controls is very easy. In total, however, only 32 percent admitted to breaking the rules.

A few months before Elon Musk left OpenAI’s board of directors in February 2018, he tried to recruit Sam Altman to join a “world-class AI lab” within Tesla. Musk went as far as offering the OpenAI CEO a Tesla board seat, according to emails and testimony presented in federal court on Wednesday during the Musk v. Altman trial. The emails were shown to a jury during the cross examination of Shivon Zilis, a former OpenAI adviser and board member who is also the mother of four of Musk’s children.

Musk’s core claim in this lawsuit is that Altman and OpenAI president Greg Brockman effectively stole a nonprofit, using the $38 million Musk invested to create a private company worth more than $800 billion today. On Wednesday, lawyers for Musk showed video depositions of former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati and former OpenAI board member Helen Toner, to raise concerns over Altman’s alleged history of deceit.

OpenAI’s legal team has responded to Musk’s claims by questioning his true motives, arguing that the Tesla CEO has had “sour grapes” ever since he failed to assume control of OpenAI in 2017. He has since started a rival, for-profit AI lab. OpenAI’s lawyers used Zilis’ cross-examination on Wednesday to bring up evidence about Musk’s alleged plans to subvert OpenAI, and tried to suggest Zilis was privy to those plans. As it pertains to this case, one of Zilis’ most important roles at OpenAI was acting as a conduit between Musk and Altman.

In a text from February 2018 presented as evidence, Zilis—then an OpenAI adviser, as well as a Neuralink and Tesla executive—asked Altman, “Did you think through a B Corp subsidiary of Tesla?”

“There was documentary evidence that, at several points, Mr. Musk had contemplated seeking to join Sam Altman to the board and offered that option,” said OpenAI lawyer William Savitt outside the courthouse on Wednesday. “It was part of Mr. Musk’s effort to corrupt OpenAI and absorb it into Tesla … he was trying to get Altman to abandon the mission and be part of Tesla.”

In an email to Tesla’s VP of communications, Sarah O’Brien, from November 2017, Zilis shared a draft of an FAQ page about an event Tesla was planning to hold at the NeurIPS AI conference. “The purpose of this event is to share that Tesla is building a world leading AI lab(?) which will rival the likes of Google / DeepMind and Facebook AI Research,” the drafted FAQ read. The document continues, “One major issue for Tesla is when people think of Elon and AI, they think of OpenAI.”

Another part of the FAQ labeled “Who?” lists several Tesla executives who were planned to lead the unit, including Musk and Andrej Karpathy, a former OpenAI researcher. Altman’s name is listed next to Musk’s with two question marks beside it.

The FAQ is marked up with notes including that Altman could be a moderator for the NeurIPS event, which “could be a forcing function for Sam to commit to TeslaAI.” Another note reads that Tesla AI’s “strategy had yet to be defined and some of it may be deeply proprietary.”

Zilis testified on Wednesday that Altman never ended up joining Tesla, and the AI lab and the NeurIPS launch event never came to fruition. She also testified that Musk reached out to Karpathy about recruiting him to Tesla. Savitt told reporters that Zilis’ testimony on Karpathy is “directly contrary to what Mr. Musk told the jury just a few days ago.” Earlier in this trial, Musk testified that Karpathy left OpenAI of his own volition.