Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

NordVPN’s next-gen antivirus aces independent testing with a 96% phishing block rate

Published

on


  • NordVPN’s next-gen antivirus blocked 96% of phishing sites in the 2026 AV-Comparatives test
  • The software perfectly distinguished between active malicious links and 200 legitimate banking URLs
  • Detection rates jumped by 6% compared to the previous test in May 2025

When you’re searching for the best VPN to secure your online traffic, you increasingly need an app that does more than just encrypt your data. As phishing attacks grow more sophisticated, top providers are evolving into robust, all-in-one cybersecurity suites, and independent testing shows these built-in tools are making a real impact.

In the newly released 2026 Anti-Phishing Comparative Test by independent cybersecurity evaluation authority AV-Comparatives, NordVPN’s next-generation antivirus achieved a massive 96% phishing detection rate.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

The security problem AI leaders actually agree on

Published

on

AI company CEOs Sam Altman (OpenAI), Demis Hassabis (Google DeepMind), and Dario Amodei (Anthropic) disagree on a lot, like how fast the technology should develop, the best way to regulate it, and how to prepare society for smarter-than-human AI, among other things.

That makes it all the more remarkable that they — along with 85 other experts in tech, biology, and national security policy — recently signed on to an open letter calling for more robust regulations around gene synthesis. They’re all concerned that AI systems might be used to help develop and even deploy dangerous biological weapons designed through gene synthesis, which is used to chemically build custom DNA sequences in a lab, rather than relying solely on existing natural DNA templates.

The simple fact of multiple CEOs of fiercely competitive AI companies aligning on anything is remarkable. But to understand how they came to this agreement, we have to take a step back to understand what gene synthesis is, how it works, and why the possibility of AI-assisted misuse of the technology generates so much fear.

Modern microbiology owes a lot to gene synthesis. Researchers can order synthetic genes from commercial DNA providers to develop new vaccines, drugs, and gene therapies for inherited diseases like hemophilia; produce human insulin, boost agricultural output, and more. Gene synthesis is a foundational technology for successful CAR-T cell therapies for cancer and many diagnostic tools. The demand for synthetic DNA is growing globally, and it’s never been cheaper or simpler to write genetic code.

Advertisement

But for all its power, gene synthesis also carries substantial risk. The same technology that can enable life-saving new gene therapies can also assist in the creation of deadly pathogens by assembling some of the same nucleotides — the genetic building blocks that create the code for all of life — in a different order.

Most US companies that provide gene synthesis services screen orders for genetic sequences of concern, such as those that can make a pathogen more dangerous or transmissible, and to verify that customers are legitimate. They do so voluntarily, well aware of the potential dangers.

But not every provider does so. “As long as screening remains voluntary, some companies will not do it,” Becky Mackelprang, the director for security programs at the Engineering Biology Research Consortium, told me over email. There’s a real risk that bad actors could find a gene synthesis company with more lax standards, and that might mean disaster.

We’ve been fortunate so far. “This technology has been commercially deployed for more than 20 years and has never been misused to cause harm,” James Diggans, the vice president of policy and biosecurity at gene synthesis company Twist Bioscience, told me over email.

Advertisement

But AI threatens to complicate matters, opening up new frontiers of risk.

Both large language models (LLMs) and AI biodesign tools enable scientists to design entirely novel genetic sequences. This is a boon for industrial and medical applications — and a challenge for current screening systems, which use similarity to known pathogenic or toxic sequences in order to detect risk. A screening system should catch someone trying to order sequences of a known dangerous virus like Ebola, for example, but it might miss a new sequence that could still be risky. Last year, a study published in Science demonstrated that our screening systems have kept pace with AI capabilities so far. “But the industry clearly understands this will not be the case forever,” Diggans said.

Mackelprang is worried that AI could reduce the knowledge barriers that have historically prevented bad actors from developing bioweapons. Frontier AI systems, for example, seem to already outperform expert virologists on questions about performing complex laboratory procedures.

But there is knowing and there is doing, and biological lab work is still hard. “Researchers spend years trying to make a protocol work even after consulting directly with others who have perfected that exact same protocol. I think AI can help someone ‘level up’ their laboratory skills, but I do not think AI can enable someone without any biological training to create a serious hazard,” Mackelprang told me.

Advertisement

That means that gene synthesis companies are still a primary chokepoint for anyone trying to produce a novel genetic sequence. Mackelprang’s main concern is that aspiring bioterrorists might use AI to generate harmful genetic sequences that can evade current or future screening systems. “In the near term, I think the likelihood of these types of misuse are quite low. But when the potential consequences are severe and technologies continue to develop rapidly, we have a responsibility…to develop reasonable prevention and mitigation options,” she said.

Maximizing the benefits of gene synthesis while minimizing the risks is difficult, but not impossible. That’s why Diggans and Mackelprang — along with Altman, Hassabis, and Amodei, as well as other gene synthesis providers, tech entrepreneurs, life science executives, and national security experts — signed the open letter calling for mandatory gene synthesis screening and recordkeeping of orders.

Co-organized by the think tanks Institute for Progress and the Foundation for American Innovation, the open letter also calls for providers to record synthesis orders and sequence data to support biosecurity investigations “so that any threat that might evade initial screening can be traced back to its source…Awareness of traceability itself deters misuse.” This would, ideally, address Mackelprang’s concern that AI might eventually help bad actors evade existing screening protocols.

“Screening every DNA synthesis order before it’s manufactured is the kind of unglamorous, common-sense step that prevents a much bigger problem later,” DJ Kleinbaum, the co-founder of the biotech startup Emerald Cloud Lab, an automated lab scientists can access remotely, and one of the signatories, said.

Advertisement

But Altman, Hassabis, and Amodei’s shared signatures may be the most meaningful evidence that the letter matters. For all their disagreements, they are well aware that their tools can be used for tremendous — even catastrophic — harm.

AIxBio risk: A thing on which we can all agree

While it’s far from the first time frontier AI companies have spoken to AI-enabled biological risk, the open letter is the first place they’ve come together to do so in a single voice. “Support for screening does not depend on any particular view of AI,” the letter reads. “This is a rare moment of agreement across stakeholders that are often at odds.”

The letter calls for Congress to act now. “We applaud the legislative efforts currently underway,” the letter says, alluding to the bipartisan Biosecurity Modernization and Innovation Act, a bill that gives the Department of Commerce a year to develop new gene synthesis screening rules. The letter also suggests that US states should implement screening requirements based on federal and industry guidelines to create a unified national standard rather than an inconsistent set of laws.

Advertisement

The letter isn’t about applying biosecurity regulations to the AI companies themselves, which likely would have limited the number of tech signatories. (Though major companies do actively try to prevent their models from giving away dangerous biological knowledge, albeit not always successfully.) Focusing on screening is tractable, has the buy-in of several gene synthesis providers, and provides a concrete example of how AI can lower the barrier to doing both great and terrible things. And of course, it’s ultimately something a human being has to do at this point.

The AI companies are actively thinking about the catastrophic risks that their technologies might enable. Anthropic is hiring a technical chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear threat investigator for its threat intelligence team. In May, after launching GPT-Rosalind, a frontier model to accelerate life sciences research and drug discovery, OpenAI introduced Rosalind Biodefense, a program that allows trusted developers to use GPT-Rosalind to build biodefense tools. On June 4, the day after the open letter went live, security specialists at OpenAI and Anthropic served as panelists at the Bipartisan Commission for Biodefense’s meeting on AI and biological threats.

But according to Twist Biosciences’s Diggans, the best way to defend against misuse of AI models to design harmful pathogens is to use AI models as defense. These defensive models can be used to detect attempted misuse before anything happens. DNA synthesis companies can employ these models to ensure orders for highly-engineered sequences are given the same scrutiny and evaluation as orders for naturally occurring sequences.

“[Gene synthesis] companies have to agree to have their order screened not just against a list of sequences but by an AI that people agree is smart enough to recognize and thwart an adversary who’s trying to build a deadly pathogen,” David Haussler, the scientific director of the UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute and a signatory of the open letter, told me.

Advertisement

Using AI to protect against AI

The good news is that this work is already underway. Last year, I reported that OpenAI provided $30 million in seed funding to biodefense startup Valthos, which develops frontier AI systems to detect biological threats and create medical countermeasures. Valthos’s co-founder Kathleen McMahon signed the open letter.

In September 2025, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and philanthropic nonprofit Sentinel Bio created the Pandemic Preparedness Engine AI platform (sometimes referred to simply as “the Engine”). They’re taking a biosecurity-by-design approach, considering biosecurity risks from the outset. “This includes a multi-layered approach to biosecurity: from protecting biosecurity-sensitive data needed to train the AI to carefully managing who has access to the Engine and monitoring how they use it,” Sarah Carter, a biosecurity consultant at CEPI, told me over email.

Users of the Pandemic Preparedness Engine would use AI prompts to interact with the system, similar to how people use consumer platforms. User prompts could be monitored in real time by a specialized AI agent built to assess the risk of misuse potential or attempts to “jailbreak” an LLM to get it to generate prohibited content, such as the “recipe” for assembling a deadly virus.

Advertisement

Still, even commercially available technologies may present problems of their own. This week, Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5, a version of its highly powerful and restricted Mythos model that the company has aimed to make safe for public use. Claude automatically stops use of Fable if it detects requests involving cybersecurity, biology, chemistry, or distillation (attempting to extract Claude’s capabilities to train competing AI models), shunting those requests to a less powerful model. Users have complained that trying to discuss biology for legitimate purposes with Fable 5 results in the model refusing to engage or defaulting to less capable models instead. The Fable example shows that it’s possible to overcorrect, limiting the potential upside of using AI for the life sciences.

“The major providers of LLMs are doing their best to prevent the models from answering questions that would enable somebody to do something dangerous,” Haussler told me. “[But] the end product of jailbreaking an LLM that’s capable of teaching you how to build a deadly virus is that you now have an LLM that’s capable of teaching anybody how to build a very dangerous virus. And we don’t want that to happen.”

It’s here that the letter’s signatories hope they can stop a still-simmering problem before it comes to a full boil. “Mandatory synthesis screening is that rare case where a threat is clearly visible and substantial prevention clearly achievable before any crisis has occurred,” said Richard Danzig, a natural security expert who served as the 71st Secretary of the Navy under former President Bill Clinton. “Opportunities to act in advance are unusual in this field. I think we should take this one.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp hit by a Meta outage

Published

on

Meta had a bad Friday morning. A major Meta outage knocked out Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger for users around the world, starting shortly before 10am ET. By midday it was recovering, unevenly, region by region.

The trouble appeared to begin on WhatsApp, then spread. Facebook users were abruptly logged out, met with a “Query Error” or a “Sorry, something went wrong” message, and unable to log back in. Others could open the app but not post, comment, react, search, or load Stories and Marketplace.

What Down Detector shows

The outage-tracking site Down Detector logged a sharp spike. Facebook bore the brunt, with reports passing 130,000; Instagram logged around 9,500, and WhatsApp far fewer. Across all three, most people flagged problems with the app, then login.

Those numbers are self-reported, so they track complaints, not Meta’s own data. But the reports came in from far beyond the US, from the Philippines and Taiwan to Australia, Spain, and South Africa, which points to something central rather than a local glitch.

Advertisement

Businesses caught out

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

It was not just scrolling. Meta’s status page logged “high disruptions” across its business products, including Facebook Ads Manager, the Messenger Platform, the Messenger API for Instagram, and the WhatsApp Business Platform. Advertisers could not create or edit ads, and Meta apologised “for any inconvenience.” On a Friday, the timing stung.

Meta confirms the disruption, but not the cause

Meta acknowledged the problems on its status page, flagging “high disruptions” and saying its engineering teams were “actively looking to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.” It did not say what caused the outage, or how many users were hit.

Advertisement

There is no word yet on whether it was a configuration error, an infrastructure failure, or something else.

Recovery was already under way. Meta marked some services, such as ad delivery, as resolved, with others “in the process of being restored.” On the consumer side, Facebook was loading closer to normal and Down Detector reports were falling, though some users still saw an empty Stories bar, a stale feed, or a “Try Again” error.

The scale is the point: Meta’s apps reach billions, and even a couple of hours offline ripples through messaging, businesses, and logins far beyond the feed. It capped an eventful day for Meta, which this morning pledged free AI glasses to every blind US veteran. This is a developing story; we will update it with Meta’s explanation and an all-clear.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How to watch Canada vs Bosnia: Free Streams & TV Channels

Published

on

It promises to be a fantastic Friday in Toronto as FIFA World Cup 2026 co-hosts Canada open their Group B campaign against Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Jesse Marsch’s squad is packed with exciting talents ready to shine on home soil including Bayern Munich’s Alphonso Davies, Villarreal winger Tajon Buchanan and Juventus striker Jonathan David, who is Les Rouges’ all-time record goalscorer. Davies has been ruled out of the opening game after failing to recover from a hamstring injury, but the noises from the Canada camp suggest they are confident their captain will play some part in the group stage. Nevertheless, the co-hosts will be confident of securing their first-ever point – or three – at the finals against Bosnia after returning empty-handed from their previous two World Cup appearances.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Cable Lobbyists Show How Trump FCC’s Extortive ‘Foreign Router Ban’ Isn’t Workable

Published

on

from the going-great,-thanks-for-asking dept

Back in March I noted how the Trump FCC under Brendan Carr had announced a “new ban” on all routers made overseas (which is pretty much all of them). At the time we also noted how this was less of a ban and more of a shakedown, with router manufacturers required to beg the Trump FCC for conditional waivers (fees, favors, whatever) to continue doing business in the States.

Several router manufacturers (like Amazon’s Eero and Netgear) have subsequently received exemptions from the Trump administration, but because there is zero transparency to the process, we have no idea what they agreed to. Did they pay the Trump administration a bribe? Did they agree to surveillance backdoors for ICE operations? Who knows? Great stuff.

Now the cable lobby appears to be balking at the purported foreign router ban. In a petition filed with the FCC last week (spotted by Ars Technica) NCTA (The Internet & Television Association) — the cable industry’s biggest lobbying org — asked for a massive exemption from the restrictions, noting that they’re simply not practical in real-world practice:

“NCTA requests an expedited grant of this waiver to enable its members and their suppliers to navigate unavoidable supply chain shortages and prevent disruptions in the availability of broadband for NCTA members’ customers, while still fulfilling the rules’ national security and public safety purpose.”

So basically you’ve got a ban on foreign routers that is more about extortion than protecting national security. Which the cable industry says it can’t adhere to because AI hype, tariffs and unnecessary wars have driven up the costs of many internal router components, making adherence expensive if not impossible. Great stuff, very savvy policymaking by people who definitely know what they’re doing.

Advertisement

Part of the “foreign router ban” was supposed to involve forcing hardware manufacturing to return to the states. But because Trump and much of his administration have a fourth-grader-level understanding about how this stuff works (like his desire to suddenly have smartphones built in the U.S.), the cable industry’s filing notes that the “onshoring” of manufacturing and supply chains isn’t realistically possible either:

“Like AT&T, NCTA members are encouraging their suppliers to quickly pursue required onshoring, and, in the meantime, seek Conditional Approvals for Covered Routers as necessary. However, unavoidable supply chain shortages in critical substrate material and memory modules (including both volatile and nonvolatile memory) significantly constrain the industry. AT&T’s suppliers are not unique; the same impediments they are experiencing impose inevitable limitations on NCTA’s suppliers. Accordingly, NCTA seeks the same relief on behalf of its suppliers. Given the immediacy of these issues and the concrete harms that would result from disruptions to the availability of broadband to large swaths of US consumers and businesses, the grant of this Petition is warranted.”

These companies, many of which supported and enabled Trump, now have to pretend this all makes sense as they navigate a costly minefield of weird bullshit that won’t accomplish any of its purported goals.

This is all exceptionally chaotic and dumb, and it’s unlikely that Brendan Carr, who spends most of his time trying to censor comedians and whining about “wokeness,” is capable of managing the scale of this sort of overhaul — even if it were practical, which it isn’t.

When you read most press coverage of this router ban, they don’t really make it clear to readers that this is all very unworkable and stupid. Trump and his administration are given undeserved credit on competency and policy, as the press, companies, and policymakers all try to trip over themselves to normalize the sheer pointless stupidity and expense of it all.

Advertisement

If the country cared about national security we’d focus on corruption. We’d pass a meaningful modern internet privacy law. We’d shore up, staff, and properly fund cybersecurity regulators. We’d regulate data brokers. Instead we get a giant pile of unworkable extortion slop being overseen by weird zealots.

Filed Under: brendan carr, hardware, national security, onshoring, privacy, router ban, routers, telecom

Companies: ncta

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

SpaceX’s $75B IPO has investors seeing stars

Published

on

OFFBEAT

It might also make Musk the world’s first trillionaire

SpaceX has priced its blockbuster initial public offering at $135 a share, raising $75 billion and valuing Elon Musk’s rocket biz at roughly $1.78 trillion.

The haul could rise to about $86 billion if underwriters exercise their option to buy more stock, making it the largest IPO in US history.

Advertisement

The company confirmed [PDF] that 555.6 million shares of Class A common stock were sold in the offering, with another 83.3 million available to underwriters.

SpaceX is a loss-making company. In its Form S-1, filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, it divided operations into Space (Falcon 9 and the like), Connectivity (Starlink), and AI. Only the Connectivity segment is turning a profit, to the tune of $4.4 billion in 2025, while the others continue to rack up losses. Making a profit from AI continues to elude many companies – SpaceX is not the only entity where investment exceeds revenue, and Starship remains a work in progress.

In the company’s Form S-1, SpaceX reported a net loss of $4.9 billion on revenue of $18.7 billion in 2025. The IPO values the company at more than 90 times that revenue.

According to The Financial Times, the IPO was heavily oversubscribed – orders exceeded the number of shares on offer by more than three times. Retail investors also ordered more than $100 billion of shares, and were allocated between 20 and 25 percent of the shares sold.

Advertisement

The record-breaking IPO reflects investor appetite for AI-related companies, as well as a bet that SpaceX’s estimate of a $28.5 trillion total addressable market, including $22.7 trillion in “Enterprise Applications,” proves realistic.

Skeptics may recall that promises and assurances associated with Elon Musk rarely survive contact with reality.

We will update when trading kicks off today. Depending on how trading goes, Musk could be a paper trillionaire by the end of the day, thanks to his shares in SpaceX. That figure could climb further if SpaceX ever delivers on its more ambitious plans, from a human settlement on Mars to space-based datacenters.

Musk may also be in line for a vast Tesla payout if the carmaker hits targets including a sharp rise in valuation and the delivery of a million robots over the next decade. ®

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

What we learned in Cleveland about Seattle’s future: Advice from a Rust Belt city on the rise

Published

on

Some of the Cleveland leaders who shared their advice during GeekWire’s visit to northeast Ohio. (GeekWire Photos / John Cook)

CLEVELAND, Ohio — A century ago, this city was booming.

By 1920, it was the fifth-largest metropolis in the United States, fueled by manufacturing, immigration, industrial innovation and entrepreneurs who transformed it into a center of invention and business creation.

And then, seemingly overnight, it all changed. The economy shifted. Jobs dried up. Corporate headquarters moved. 

Cleveland’s history is a cautionary tale for Seattle, which is at its own inflection point as we move from the software era to the AI era or what’s next. But the modern story of Cleveland is one of inspiration: a lesson in what becomes possible when business, civic and public leaders pull in the same direction.

That’s why GeekWire contributing columnist Charles Fitzgerald and I spent several days in Cleveland this week — speaking to philanthropists, developers, entrepreneurs and even Mayor Justin Bibb and Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine. This mini fact-finding mission started four months ago after Charles, a tech veteran and Seattle angel investor, wrote a provocative column for GeekWire titled: A warning to Seattle: Don’t become the next Cleveland

Advertisement

Mayor Bibb was on the phone with us the next day, making the case for his city. He invited us to explore Cleveland — its rise, fall and rebirth — and get to know another story about a rebounding Midwest city. 

We came to learn about Cleveland. We left with new insights about Seattle and what’s needed to foster a prosperous future.

From the moment we arrived in northeast Ohio — where Mayor Bibb’s voice welcomes airport visitors to a city built on “grit and innovation” — to the moment we left, one thing stood out. While not everyone agrees on every issue, there is a palpable sense that Clevelanders are “all in” — rowing in the same direction like a crew quietly propelling its shell along the Cuyahoga River.

Here’s what we learned from Cleveland:

Advertisement
East Cleveland Mayor Sandra Morgan at the Big Bets for America event in Cleveland. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Sandra Morgan is the mayor of East Cleveland, a small city bordering Cleveland with one of the highest poverty rates in the U.S.

Her advice to Seattle: count your blessings.

“The City of Cleveland, and by extension, East Cleveland, rode a wave of innovation and industry and growth that was unparalleled, really, just about anywhere in the country for quite a while,” she said. “And then when we took a dip and a turn, it was a pretty dramatic turn of events. And it has taken probably the better part of 50 years to right the ship and turn things around.”

For East Cleveland, she said, “that ship has yet to be righted. We’re still working on it.”

But Morgan wasn’t telling Seattle to fear growth. “Chaotic growth, it’s fun, but it’s not necessarily the best way to grow,” she said. “And always with growth comes some unforeseen issues and problems, but growth still is better than no growth, in my opinion.”

Advertisement

She also extended an invitation: “When you get tired of being in Seattle, come to East Cleveland, Ohio. We’ve got plenty of space for you.”

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine speaks with reporters in Cleveland. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, who has led the state since 2019, was in Cleveland announcing a $300 million workforce development program through JobsOhio.

“I don’t give advice to other areas,” he said in response to our question. “But my advice to people is, come to Ohio. Come work in Ohio. You will not find a better place, better people, quality of life. Cost of living is low compared to the two coasts.”

He pointed to the companies betting on the state. “There’s a reason why we are getting companies like Anduril that are relocating at least part of their new business to Ohio. There’s a reason why Joby is here. There is a reason why Sherwin-Williams stayed here.”

“Look, this is our time. It is the Midwest’s time in history,” DeWine said. “We do not wish anybody to not be successful, we want everybody to be successful in this country. But we know we have something special here in Ohio.”

Advertisement
Cleveland Mayor Justin Bibb at the Big Bets for America event. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Justin Bibb is the 39-year-old mayor of Cleveland. When we asked him what advice he would give Seattle and its new mayor, Katie Wilson, he started with the fundamentals.

“You’ve got to focus on the basic plumbing and tackling of good city governance,” he said. “At the same time, as former mayor Pete Buttigieg always says, the job is part pothole, part vision. And that’s kind of been my duality of, hey, the cops gotta get paid, the streets have to be safe, the potholes have to be fixed. City government has to function well.”

But running the city well is only half the job, he said. “You have to chart a vision for where the city is going to go. Because in this economic environment our customers, our residents and our businesses can choose like that, so we have to make sure that our value proposition is sticky and compelling. And to me that’s the job of mayor.”

Cuyahoga County Executive Chris Ronayne at a Cleveland Guardians game at Progressive Field. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Chris Ronayne is the Cuyahoga County executive, the top elected official in the county that includes Cleveland, and a former planning director for the city. His advice draws on that planning background: figure out what’s working in your community, and invest in it.

“Support what’s working. Organically grow what you got,” he said, contrasting that approach with the economic development strategy of chasing the next big company. “The cavalry’s not coming,” he said. “That’s the lesson for Cleveland, and it’s a lesson for Seattle.”

He also pointed to immigration as essential to growth, noting that immigrants have been the Cleveland region’s only source of population gains in recent years. “Metros have to lead the way on strategies to bring newcomers to your city,” he said, acknowledging that it’s “a complicated task” for any metro region in the current environment.

Advertisement

His third piece of advice: don’t fixate on the giants. Cleveland was once known for its Fortune 500 headquarters, as Seattle is now, he said, but “the real lifeblood is small business.”

John Nottingham, co-founder of Nottingham Spirk in front of the company’s wall of patents. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

John Nottingham is co-founder of Nottingham Spirk, the Cleveland innovation lab behind products like the Crest SpinBrush, with nearly 1,600 patents to its name. The firm operates out of a renovated former Christian Science church overlooking the city’s University Circle district.

His advice: “You have some pretty high-powered entrepreneurs in Seattle. You should appreciate your entrepreneurs.”

Nottingham reached back a century for his cautionary tale: John D. Rockefeller, who built Standard Oil into “the first multi-national company, driving everything else,” he said. But the oil baron’s success bred resentment in his hometown. “He was almost pushed out of Cleveland, and there’s a lot of stories about that.”

Rockefeller decamped to New York, and later in life directed a massive gift that built the University of Chicago. The lesson for Seattle, where prominent tech leaders have been leaving the region, wasn’t subtle.

Advertisement
Brad Whitehead of the Good Jobs Fund at the former Westinghouse light bulb factory, part of The Midline industrial district he is developing on Cleveland’s near east side. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Brad Whitehead is managing director of site readiness for the Good Jobs Fund and developer of The Midline, an industrial district taking shape on Cleveland’s near east side, including the former Westinghouse light bulb factory where he gave us a tour.

Cleveland’s mistake, he said, was complacency. The city had reinvented itself so many times that its leaders trusted it would simply happen again. Seattle can learn from this.

“Where the next thing has always come along, you can’t assume that that’s going to happen,” he said. “For many years, we had this sense of who we are, and because we had the great names, that it was all going to continue to work well.”

The region learned too late that prestige and payrolls are different things. “Just because somebody has a corporate headquarters doesn’t mean that’s where they’re producing. We’ve got fabulous companies that figured out how to adapt and survive, but that meant the jobs often left and went to other places.”

Michelle Tomallo, co-founder and chief people officer of FIT Technologies, at the company’s downtown Cleveland offices. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Michelle Tomallo is co-founder and chief people officer at FIT Technologies, an employee-owned IT managed service provider in downtown Cleveland.

Her advice echoed a theme we heard repeatedly: success has a way of narrowing your vision.

Advertisement

“Be very thoughtful about what the future is holding,” she said, “because I think when we have grand success, sometimes we are far away from what’s coming next.”

Josh Rosen, co-owner of Sustainable Community Associates, in Cleveland’s Tremont neighborhood. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Josh Rosen is co-owner of Sustainable Community Associates, a real estate development company that’s converting abandoned gas stations, dry cleaners and industrial sites into housing in Cleveland’s Tremont neighborhood.

Looking at Seattle from the outside, Rosen sees concentration risk.

“It feels like Seattle is dependent on a sector, and in a lot of ways very few companies within that sector,” he said. “And that allows for a certain type of growth. But as things change, if you don’t develop a framework of interdependency of all the different stakeholders, that change can be sudden and not what you want it to be.”

The lesson, he said, “is to start to build an ecosystem of working together, so when there are shifts or there are changes, the community is prepared for that next phase.”

Advertisement

As a developer, he pointed to real estate as the place where that fragility shows up first. “You have all these buildings that are built based on a certain amount of income being produced. And that’s how those mortgages and those loans are being serviced. And what if that changes by 20 percent?”

Yvette Ittu, president and CEO of Cleveland Development Advisors, overlooking the city. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Yvette Ittu is president and CEO of Cleveland Development Advisors, which channels investment into real estate and redevelopment projects in Cleveland’s neighborhoods.

Her advice was less about any single policy and more about how a city works together.

“The collaboration between the business community, the civic sector and the public sector are imperative for anything you are going to do in your community,” she said. “It really takes connectivity with all of those sectors, collaboration and communication.”

Nathan Kelly, president of Playhouse Square Real Estate, in Cleveland’s Playhouse Square theater district. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Nathan Kelly is president of Playhouse Square Real Estate, part of the nonprofit that operates one of the country’s largest performing arts districts outside of New York.

His advice gets at a prerequisite for everything else: “I think safety, real and perceived, is the most important factor for building a place or growing a place,” he said. “And I can only impact the perception of safety. But we do it with small things, like I require all of my tenants on the retail and second level to have their lights on 24/7 so that that light sheds out onto the street. We do a lot of things with color and paint that make things feel vibrant, even if you’re alone.”

Advertisement

It’s not just cosmetic, he said. The district works with the city and economic groups on uniformed officers and safety patrols, while addressing deeper human service needs. “I know who to call when somebody is having an episode that doesn’t require a police intervention. I think that’s the most fundamental.”

Chris Adams, president and CEO of Park Place Technologies.

Chris Adams is president and CEO of Park Place Technologies, an IT infrastructure services firm with more than 500 employees at its Cleveland headquarters.

Cleveland’s problem wasn’t a lack of warning signs, he said. It was the speed of the response.

“When the world started changing, we needed to, as a community, adapt quicker. I really think it is the bureaucracy that lets people down. Your job is to provide for the constituents,” he said. “We are doing well now as a community environment, but it took some time for people to pivot.”

He described the danger this way: “You are always looking in the rearview mirror and you are riding that wave, and you don’t see the land in front of you that you are about to crash into. You can only surf the wave so long. Fundamentally, people need to look forward, not behind.”

Advertisement

“Just because it has been a boom town out there for a long time, that only gets people overconfident,” he added. “If you get too confident in what you have, you can lose it.”

Baiju Shah, president and CEO of the Greater Cleveland Partnership, in downtown Cleveland. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Baiju Shah is president and CEO of the Greater Cleveland Partnership, which has organized the region’s comeback effort around a shared 10-year plan called“All In.”

His advice for Seattle is the strategy behind that name.

“You need to get your business leadership and your public leadership heavily engaged and committed. We call it ‘all in,’” he said. “There’s got to be an economic vision for the region that everyone can get aligned behind and start to work hard on these types of priorities, whatever those might be.”

Freddy Collier of the Greater Cleveland Partnership, with the Cleveland skyline behind him. (GeekWire Photo / John Cook)

Freddy Collier is senior vice president of strategy and new initiatives at the Greater Cleveland Partnership, the region’s chamber of commerce.

He pointed to the trait that carried Cleveland through its hardest decades: “One of the key things that makes Cleveland special is resilience. It continues to evolve, and reinvent itself. And that’s one of the things I love about this town. It’s a big city with a small town feel. People know each other, and people are connected.”

Advertisement

His advice for any city navigating change: invest in the things that bind people together. For Cleveland, that starts with geography: “Our natural assets I think are our superpower: our waterfront, riverfront, our trails,” he said. “And those are the things that connect people, no matter what walk of life you come from, no matter what your demographic situation is, no matter what your economic situation is.”

“We have things in this town that are unifiers, that are equalizers,” he said, “and I am really proud of that.”

Coming Saturday: John Cook and Charles Fitzgerald join the GeekWire Podcast from an abandoned Westinghouse light bulb factory in Cleveland to share what they learned, and what it means for Seattle’s future. Subscribe to GeekWire in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This Week In Security: Microsoft On Microsoft, Register Your Domains, Linux On ARM, And FreeBSD Joins The File Cache Club

Published

on

Supply chain attacks continue, with Microsoft’s own open source Azure repositories being automatically disabled by GitHub following a compromise of the packages by the Miasma worm.

OpenSourceMalware reports that the infection resulted in 73 Microsoft-related package repositories being flagged and taken offline in a little over a minute by the GitHub automated security system, with over 40 repositories being related to Azure and the rest distributed across the Microsoft organization.

The center of the infection appears to be the Microsoft Durabletask package, which was previously compromised in May and used to push infected packages to PyPi. Considering that all of the supply chain worms also steal credentials for every service they can find in the build or developer environment they infect, it seems likely that credentials stolen in the original attack were never properly disabled.

Disabling the repositories can help stem the infected packages and GitHub actions from spreading and infecting more organizations, but of course any build processes depending on those packages will not function. In May, the Durabletask package showed over 400,000 downloads per month.

Advertisement

The OpenSourceMalware report includes a full list of the impacted repositories.

Microsoft Fixes GitHub Token Exploit

Microsoft has finally fixed a bug in GitHub which could steal a GitHub authentication token with access to all of an accounts repositories via the embedded web-based VSCode editor which is part of GitHub itself.

Ammar Askar discovered the bug and discusses it on their blog; by manipulating the sandboxed VS Code into treating an embedded web view as user keyboard strokes, it is possible to to cause it to install a VS Code extension which is then used to exfiltrate the GitHub authentication tokens of the user using the embedded VS Code instance.

TP-Link Taeover via Unregistered Domain

Julian B demonstrates capturing traffic from TP-Link routers and access points thanks to an unregistered domain name in the firmware.

Advertisement

After finding an archive of the firmware releases for every TP-Link product, Julian simplified the list to the latest versions, and ran a custom scraper tool to extract domain names referenced in the firmware and search for matching domain names.

After registering an available domain, Julian began receiving requests from TP-Link devices checking in to a server which had lapsed, likely years ago. Fortunately, Julian reported the issue to TP-Link and was able to transfer the domain.

It’s unclear what the risks of the unregistered domain name were in the context of the TP-Link devices, however unregistered domain names can lead to all sorts of issues in the wrong situations.

A Pile of OpenSSL Vulns

The OpenSSL library has a new collection of vulnerabilities which range from low-severity flaws in message verification in functions which aren’t used in any of the OpenSSL implemented protocols to a high-severity use-after-free bug in PKCS7 handling which could be used to run arbitrary code.

Advertisement

Use-after-free bugs occur when a chunk of memory is dynamically allocated, then freed and returned to the memory pool, but a later piece of code re-uses the memory that is no longer claimed. In the meantime, this memory could have been assigned to another variable or otherwise restructured, leading to memory corruption. In the case of OpenSSL, the memory associated with a PKCS7 container (a certificate storage method) or a S/MIME message (usually used in secure email) can be manipulated into using freed memory.

The advisory warns that applications processing PKCS7 or S/MIME are affected; fortunately most uses of OpenSSL are unlikely to be directly impacted (neither of those functions are common in web servers or similar), but as always, update as soon as possible!

NightmareEclipse is Back

The researcher previously identified as NightmareEclipse, known for releasing advanced Windows vulnerabilities with working proof of concept code, has returned as MSNightmare releasing several new exploits after previously being removed from GitHub. Despite a strongly worded (and poorly received) public statement by Microsoft threatening criminal investigations, the researcher returns with the RoguePlanet vulnerability.

RoguePlanet exploits race conditions in Windows Defender under Windows 10 and Windows 11 to gain a system-level shell, a fairly common trend in the vulnerabilities found by this researcher.

Advertisement

Additionally, another BitLocker bypass has been released, called GreatXML, which unlocks BitLocker protected drives if a Windows Defender offline scan has ever been run.

Of course, these releases coincide with Patch Tuesday, so they’re unlikely to be addressed before the July patch day.

It appears Microsoft has backed down from their initial press release which appeared to claim that vulnerability research and development outside of the guidelines Microsoft decided would be treated as criminal behavior; this was not well received by much of the security industry. At the start of the modern security industry in the late 1990s, public release of vulnerabilities was common. Companies had no way to reach a security contact to get it fixed, simply did not care to fix it, or were actively hostile to researchers. Through years and decades of community programs, it is now normal to reach out to a company with security flaws and have an expectation they will be fixed, and often rewarded either monetarily through structured bounty programs like HackerOne or through public credit to the researchers who found the flaws (nobody wants to be paid in exposure, but security is now an industry, and having a well-known name and track record can be valuable.)

Unfortunately, recently, it seems Microsoft may have forgotten that while disclosure to the vendor has become the norm, it is simply a social contract. Having already publicly alienated one skilled researcher (NightmareEclipse), the company seems to be doing the best it can to alienate others by burning community good will. Expect more publicly released vulnerabilities in the wake.

Advertisement

Linux Arm Fixes

Phoronix reports that the Linux kernel has patched a critical-severity flaw on Arm CPUs in the memory allocation logic. The list of processors affected continues to grow, including some NVIDIA embedded platforms.

The flaw lies in specific ordering requirements for accessing memory via the TLB, or “Translation Lookaside Buffer”, a critical part of the virtual memory and memory protection system. The TLB is a cache of recently resolved lookups of physical memory locations, so any corruption of the TLB can cause invalid memory reads, leading to almost the same results as recent kernel vulnerabilities in the Linux page cache system which allowed binaries to be replaced in RAM.

The bug was found thanks to advisories from Arm themselves clarifying that additional protections were needed around modifications to the TLB cache on these chips. The real-world impact remains to be seen, but now that the bug and patches are public, I’d expect proof of concept code to follow soon after. It’s also safe to assume that this flaw affects other operating systems on Arm platforms, as well, but there is no public information yet.

FreeBSD Gets a Page-Cache Bug

FreeBSD racks up another kernel bug this week, the amusingly named Bumsrakete (“Bum Rocket” or “Bang Rocket”), complete with a well-crafted troll of an announcement, right down to the use of Comic Sans for the announcement site.

Advertisement

Beneath the crap-posting exterior lies a legitimate CVE (CVE-2026-45257) where any user with access to the PMAP_HAS_DMAP system (the standard configuration) can overwrite the disk page cache in memory. This is the FreeBSD flavor of the kernel cache flaws in Linux used by CopyFail, DirtyPipe, and friends, and even involves decryption primitives in the kernel similar to the original CopyFail process.

It’s not surprising that following the multiple disk cache corruption bugs in Linux disclosed this spring, other operating systems with similar functionality are being examined and new flaws showing up.

NPM to Block Auto Install Scripts

NPM is introducing major changes in NPM 12 to attempt to stem the flood of supply-chain vulnerabilities by removing the automatic execution of commands from the install phase of packages and disabling the use of remote URLs as dependencies.

Most of the NPM-based worms infecting packages at record rates use the install script process, hooking either pre-install, install, or post-install scripts to run commands automatically as a package dependency is included. Since the install script runs as the user (or build service) pulling the dependencies, it has direct access to any credentials or files that user and service has. Under the new model an infected package could still perform malicious actions inside a compiled application or site, but a major mechanism for automatic spreading of malicious packages will be addressed.

Advertisement

It’s good to see progress made towards addressing the underlying weaknesses in the package ecosystem which aid in spreading malicious packages.

Libinput Security Fix

The libinput library sees a pair of security fixes this week, centered around the handling of device names for uinput and uhid devices. Maliciously named devices could execute commands as root.

To be able to exploit this, a user needs to already be on the system and have the ability to create new uinput devices. This is normally restricted to root, however if steam-devices, antimicrox, or kdeconnectd packages are installed, the permissions to create a device are modified and any user logged into the system can create a uinput device.

Go forth, and update!

Advertisement

Mini Shai-Hulud Hides in Censorship

The Shai-Hulud, Mini Shai-Hulud, and Miasma worms have been prolifically infecting packages on NPM and PyPi as well as VS Code extensions and GitHub actions. Using a combination of captured worm code and publicly released versions of the worms, researchers have been reverse engineering the behavior of the worm using the decrypted payloads.

Amusingly, they have discovered that the Mini Shai-Hulud worm attempts to hide from automatic analysis and detection via AI prompt injection. The payload file executed during a NPM package install contains a block of comment text referencing biological and nuclear weapons, topics many AI models refuse to allow.

Interpreting the comment as a banned request, the AI models may immediately stop processing the rest of the file, either blocking further analysis by researchers or disabling AI-based malware detection tools scanning for malicious payloads.

Another Record Patch Tuesday

For the second time this year, Microsoft has a record-breaking number of fixes included in Patch Tuesday with more than 200 security fixes, including fixes for two vulnerabilities released by NightmareEcllipse in recent weeks, however none of the fixes specifically reference the conflict between Microsoft and the researcher.

Advertisement

Outside of the Patch Tuesday fixes, Microsoft also fixed 360 browser vulnerabilities.

With the increasing automatic bug finding via AI tools, this may become the new normal for Patch Tuesday fix counts.

Python Linter Blocks Shai-Hulud

Sometimes pedantry pays off. StepSecurity brings the tale of a supply chain infection of the popular Pythagoria-io GPT Pilot package, an AI coding assistant tool. After one of the developers was infected by the Miasma supply chain worm, the worm performed the typical trick of attempting to reversion and push compromised versions of all accessible packages.

This time, the commits containing the trojaned were rejected by the Python linter, Ruff, for not matching the style guidelines of the project. Linters analyze code for style, comments, and syntax (think the pretty printing in a code editor that highlights incorrect tabs and spaces or deprecated functions.)

Advertisement

The developer will still need to clean up their system and make sure to revoke all tokens the worm has access to, but the project itself was spared infection by a humble syntax styler.

Deep Dive into Miasma

Finally, we have a dive into the Miasma worm thanks to SafeDep.

The payload source for Miasma has been open sourced, apparently by some of the developers of the malware. Previously the payload was heavily encrypted, however progress was made in decoding it during the initial wave of attacks. By open sourcing the worm, the developers likely hope to muddy the waters by creating copy-cat worms using modified techniques and signatures.

SafeDep takes a deep look into the capabilities of the payload, noting several unusual abilities including disabling GitHub environment protections, a full list of the credential harvesting capabilities, and more. Be sure to check out the full write up for an extremely detailed breakdown of each major component of the worm and the actions it takes, if that sort of thing is interesting to you!

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How To See If Netflix Is Downgrading Your Picture Quality

Published

on

It might involve connecting a keyboard to your TV, which is as fun as it sounds.

If you’re paying the ever-increasing price of a Netflix subscription, its in your best interest to get your money’s worth from it. But while you can shell out for the 4K experience, you can’t guarantee you’ll get that pristine quality at all times. That’s not to say Netflix is withholding promised subscription perks, but it does make choices on your behalf. Like every other streamer, Netflix uses a variable bit rate codec for its streams. That means it prioritizes a consistent stream, and will throttle your picture quality if it thinks doing so will prevent the stream from buffering. If you’ve ever squinted at your TV and wondered whether that episode of Love is Blind is actually in full quality, you weren’t hallucinating.

Thankfully, as one of the best streaming services in 2026, Netflix has built-in tools that can provide you with more detailed information about your streaming quality. Those tools can be accessed regardless of your streaming service, whether you’re watching on a phone, tablet, computer, or TV. However, the method by which you’ll access them is a bit different on each platform. Additionally, you’ll need to be aware of the top resolutions and frame rates Netflix is capable of delivering to your hardware, as well as of the content you’re viewing. If there’s a gap, you’ll know you’re not getting the streaming quality you paid for. Depending on the reason for any downgrades you may notice in quality, you’ll be able to figure out whether the culprit is device limitations, network issues, or Netflix itself.

Advertisement

Netflix’s apps have hidden shortcuts for quality information

While watching a movie or show on Netflix from your Mac or Windows computer, you can view detailed information about your video stream by using the keyboard shortcut Ctrl + Alt + Shift + D. This will surface stats about your current streaming session, most of which you can safely ignore. In order to figure out how robust your picture quality is, look for the bitrate and frame rate. The former will tell you what resolution is being displayed, while the latter will let you know whether you’re losing frames. So, if you’re watching a newer movie on a 4K plan, you should typically see a resolution of 3840 × 2160 and a frame rate of roughly 23.9 or 24 frames per-second, depending on both the film and your hardware.

On a mobile device, go to app settings from the My Netflix tab and select Playback Specification. This will not give you live stream information, but will tell you what quality Netflix is capable of delivering to your device. On a smart TV, press the info button on your remote or connect a Bluetooth keyboard and press F4. This will surface a small amount of stream information.

Exactly which stats you should be looking for depends largely on your hardware and operating system. Even if you pay for the Netflix subscription tier which includes 4K, it can be maddeningly difficult to actually achieve that ultra-HD resolution. Many people who pay the extra money for Netflix’s 4K subscription may not actually own hardware that meets Netflix’s exacting standards for 4K delivery. So, now that you know how to see your streaming quality stats, let’s explore the hardware and software requirements you’ll need to get the best possible picture quality.

Advertisement

The nuances of video streaming quality on Netflix

Netflix’s 4K video streaming capabilities are subject to some rather maddening hardware and software requirements. If you are watching Netflix on a display with a 1440p native resolution, the stream will fall back to 1080p rather than showing a downscaled 4K stream. Because 1440p is a common resolution for gaming monitors, this can often be a frustrating dilemma for Windows users watching on a desktop PC. Moreover, your GPU, video cable, and display must not only support 4K as you’d expect, but must also support HDCP 2.2 for digital copyright management. Your operating system must support HEVC codecs, which can require an extra package installation on Windows and some versions of Android. Netflix is transitioning to AV1 from HEVC, but for now its official guidance is that HEVC support is a requirement for 4K playback.

Even once all those criteria are satisfied, you must be using the Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome browser on Windows. Other Chromium browsers and Firefox do not support 4K, and the native Windows Netflix app is simply its own instance of Edge. I write about tech for a living and have given up making 4K work on my Windows PC, but you can check out this extremely helpful Reddit post if you want to troubleshoot your own system.

On Mac, you must have a computer with an Apple M1 or newer processor, and you must use the Safari browser. Things get more complex if you connect your Mac to an external display, in which case, refer to the display requirements for Windows above. Meanwhile, iOS devices are capped at 1080p, since even the 2025 iPad Pro is not a 4K device. As for Android, it is capped at 1080p as well. The lone exception is when using a device which runs Google TV, such as the Google TV Streamer.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Wharfedale Elysian R Series Debuts: Flagship Speakers Get AMT Upgrades, New Finishes, and Deeper Bass

Published

on

Wharfedale’s Heritage Series tends to get the loudest applause, and that is hardly surprising. Few loudspeaker brands play the vintage card with as much credibility, and commercial success. The Denton, Super Linton, Super Denton, Denton 1S, and Dovedale have helped make old-school British loudspeaker design feel relevant again rather than merely nostalgic.

But Wharfedale’s most technically ambitious loudspeakers do not live in the Heritage Series. That role belongs to Elysian, and the new Wharfedale Elysian R Series is now positioned at the top of the food chain in terms of technology, design execution, and claimed sonic performance.

ELYSIAN 4R_Lifestyle (1)_1

The Elysian R Series is not a ground-up replacement for the original Elysian lineup. Wharfedale describes it more as a disciplined evolution of the existing platform, with refinements to the AMT high-frequency driver, woven glass fibre matrix midrange and bass drivers, crossover network, cabinet construction, bass loading, finishes, and production tolerances.

In other words, this is Wharfedale reminding everyone that it can do more than walnut nostalgia and big boxes with wide baffles. The pipe-and-slippers crowd may want to take the night off before the AMT tweeter frightens the port.

Advertisement

The new range includes the Elysian 1R compact standmount, Elysian 2R reference standmount, Elysian 3R compact floorstander, Elysian 4R flagship floorstander, and Elysian CR centre channel speaker. Matching stands are available for the standmount and centre models.

Elysian R Series: What Has Changed?

ELYSIAN R Series-2

Wharfedale is carrying over the basic Elysian identity but has revisited the major acoustic and mechanical elements. The headline change is the further-developed AMT, or Air Motion Transformer, high-frequency driver. Instead of a conventional dome tweeter, the AMT uses a pleated diaphragm to move air more efficiently. For the R Series, Wharfedale specifies an ultra-lightweight PET diaphragm, an enlarged high-spec design, and an acoustically damped rear chamber intended to improve openness, extension, and treble control.

The midrange and bass drivers have also been refined. Wharfedale uses proprietary woven glass fibre matrix cones, with updates to cone construction, motor systems, phase plugs, and distortion control. The midrange driver includes an aluminium ring and custom phase plug to support dispersion and linearity, while the bass units use improved motor systems, large voice coils, die-cast chassis, and aluminium demodulation rings.

Bass loading remains a major part of the Elysian formula. Wharfedale’s Slot-Loaded Profiled Port system, or SLPP, has been further optimized for the R Series. The system is designed to equalize internal and external air pressure, improve bass extension and control, reduce distortion, and make the speakers less sensitive to room placement. That last point matters, because big speakers with serious bass can become a domestic negotiation very quickly.

The crossover has also been redesigned. Wharfedale specifies high-silicon iron-cored coils for bass, air-core coils for midrange and treble, polypropylene capacitors throughout the signal path, and low-inductance resistors. The components are mounted on newly designed “direct path” PCBs intended to shorten the signal route, with LC-OFC high-purity copper cabling used between the crossover and drive units.

Advertisement

Cabinet Design and Finishes

ELYSIAN 4R_Lifestyle (2)

The Elysian R cabinet keeps the familiar sculpted look of the original Elysian models but introduces a more contemporary visual direction. Wharfedale has replaced the previous piano lacquer black and white finishes with matte black and matte grey options, while retaining the high-gloss walnut finish that has been central to the Elysian identity.

The new finishes are joined by matte-black trims, driver detailing, and metalwork. The goal is a cleaner and more architectural look without stripping away the luxury feel. The matching stands for the Elysian 1R, Elysian 2R, and Elysian CR follow the same matte black approach.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Internally, Wharfedale uses its multi-layer PROS, or Panel Resonance Optimisation System, cabinet construction. The company says this is intended to reduce cabinet resonance and energy leakage, improving structural integrity and allowing the drivers to work with less cabinet coloration. That is the promise, anyway. The proof will be whether these speakers sound more precise than the original Elysians without losing their scale and ease.

Wharfedale Elysian 1R: Compact Standmount

WH_Elysian_1-Lifestyle_Rendering_260420-1

The Wharfedale Elysian 1R is the entry point into the new range, although “entry point” is doing a lot of work at this level. This is a two-way standmount loudspeaker using a coated glass fibre matrix bass/midrange driver and a 27 x 90mm AMT high-frequency driver, which measures roughly 1.1 x 3.5 inches.

Wharfedale specifies 89dB sensitivity, a recommended amplifier power range of 25 to 175 watts, and a peak SPL of 108dB. Frequency response is rated at 49Hz to 22kHz, with bass extension down to 44Hz and a crossover frequency of 2.6kHz.

Advertisement

The cabinet volume is 21.6 litres. The Elysian 1R stands 490mm tall on its plinth, or about 19.3 inches, with a width of 263mm, or about 10.4 inches. Net weight is 15kg per speaker, or about 33.1 pounds.

Matching stands are available and measure 476mm tall, 340mm wide, and 287mm deep with badge, or about 18.7 x 13.4 x 11.3 inches.

Wharfedale Elysian 2R: Reference Standmount

ELYSIAN 2R Standard Walnut_I5

The Wharfedale Elysian 2R is the larger and more ambitious standmount model in the lineup. Unlike most standmount speakers, this is a three-way design using a coated glass fibre matrix low-frequency driver, a coated glass fibre matrix midrange driver, and a 27 x 90mm AMT high-frequency driver, or roughly 1.1 x 3.5 inches.

Wharfedale rates the Elysian 2R at 89dB sensitivity, with a recommended amplifier power range of 25 to 250 watts and a peak SPL of 109dB. Frequency response is specified at 35Hz to 22kHz, with bass extension down to 28Hz.

Crossover points are 360Hz and 2.9kHz, with cabinet volumes of 17.5 litres and 43.6 litres. The Elysian 2R stands 700mm tall, or about 27.6 inches, with a width of 334mm, or about 13.1 inches.

Advertisement

Net weight is 30.5kg per speaker, or about 67.2 pounds, so this is not exactly a “bookshelf” speaker unless your bookshelf was built by a shipyard.

The matching Elysian 2R stands measure 428mm tall, 402mm wide, and 435mm deep with badge, or about 16.9 x 15.8 x 17.1 inches.

Wharfedale Elysian 3R: Compact Floorstander

ELYSIAN 3R Standard Black_I3

The Wharfedale Elysian 3R is the smaller of the two floorstanding models, but it still uses a proper three-way architecture. It features two coated glass fibre matrix bass drivers, a coated glass fibre matrix midrange driver, and a 27 x 90mm AMT high-frequency driver, roughly 1.1 x 3.5 inches.

Wharfedale specifies 89dB sensitivity, a recommended amplifier power range of 30 to 200 watts, and a peak SPL of 108dB. Frequency response is rated at 44Hz to 22kHz, with bass extension down to 35Hz.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement

The crossover frequencies are 375Hz and 2.9kHz, with cabinet volumes of 9.4 litres and 35 litres. The Elysian 3R stands 1050mm tall on its plinth, or about 41.3 inches, with a width of 263mm, or about 10.4 inches.

Net weight is 28.45kg per speaker, or about 62.7 pounds. It is the most room-manageable floorstander in the series, offering the full AMT, dedicated midrange, and dual-bass-driver layout without the size and weight of the flagship Elysian 4R.

Wharfedale Elysian 4R: Flagship Floorstander

ELYSIAN 4R Standard Walnut_I5

The Wharfedale Elysian 4R sits at the top of the range and is the largest, most sensitive, and deepest-reaching model in the new series. It is a three-way floorstanding loudspeaker using two coated glass fibre matrix bass drivers, a coated glass fibre matrix midrange driver, and a 27 x 90mm AMT high-frequency driver, or approximately 1.1 x 3.5 inches.

Wharfedale rates the Elysian 4R at 92dB sensitivity, with a recommended amplifier power range of 15 to 250 watts and a peak SPL of 110dB. Frequency response is specified at 30Hz to 22kHz, with bass extension down to 24Hz.

Crossover frequencies are 340Hz and 3.1kHz, with cabinet volumes of 38 litres and 79.4 litres. The Elysian 4R stands 1188mm tall on its plinth, or about 46.8 inches, with a width of 402mm, or about 15.8 inches.

Advertisement

Net weight is 49.5kg per speaker, or about 109.1 pounds. That makes it the model most likely to deliver the full Elysian R scale and low-frequency authority, but also the one that will demand the most from the room, amplifier, and the person foolish enough to move it alone.

Wharfedale Elysian CR: Centre Channel

ELYSIAN CR Walnut_I2

The Wharfedale Elysian CR is the centre channel speaker in the range, designed for matching Elysian R home cinema systems. It is a three-way design using dual coated glass fibre matrix low-frequency drivers, a coated glass fibre matrix midrange driver, and a smaller 27 x 45mm AMT high-frequency driver, or roughly 1.1 x 1.8 inches.

Wharfedale specifies 91dB sensitivity, a recommended amplifier power range of 25 to 250 watts, and a peak SPL of 110dB. Frequency response is rated at 35Hz to 22kHz, with bass extension down to 27Hz.

Crossover frequencies are 360Hz and 2.9kHz, with cabinet volumes of 5.7 litres and 64 litres. The Elysian CR measures 320mm tall and 830mm wide, or about 12.6 inches tall and 32.7 inches wide.

Net weight is 30.2kg, or about 66.6 pounds. Matching stands are available and measure 496mm tall, 618mm wide, and 372mm deep with badge, or about 19.5 x 24.3 x 14.6 inches.

Advertisement

This is clearly not a token centre speaker added to complete the brochure; it is a large, heavy, full-range centre channel intended for serious multichannel systems.

Pricing and Availability

The Wharfedale Elysian R Series is expected to be available in June in the U.S., with five models covering both stereo and home cinema systems. UK pricing listed in the supplied Wharfedale document shows the range scheduled for April 2026 availability in that market.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Elysian 1R Compact standmount is the entry point into the lineup. It is a two-way design priced at $5,995 per pair in the U.S. and £3,499 in the UK. The larger Elysian 2R Reference standmount moves to a three-way configuration and is priced at $8,495 per pair in the U.S. and £4,999 in the UK.

Advertisement

For listeners looking for floorstanding models, the Elysian 3R Compact floorstander is a three-way design priced at $9,995 per pair in the U.S. and £5,599 in the UK. The Elysian 4R Flagship floorstander sits at the top of the range and is priced at $11,995 per pair in the U.S. and £6,999 in the UK.

Wharfedale is also offering the Elysian CR Centre channel, a three-way design intended for matching home cinema systems, priced at $5,995 in the U.S. and £3,499 in the UK.

Available finishes include walnut high gloss, matte black, and lunar grey. The walnut finish preserves the more traditional luxury loudspeaker look, while matte black and lunar grey give the Elysian R Series a cleaner, more contemporary direction.

The Bottom Line

The Elysian R Series is Wharfedale’s strongest modern engineering play, not another exercise in walnut-finished nostalgia. The refinements are meaningful: upgraded AMT tweeters, revised glass fibre matrix drivers, redesigned crossovers, improved SLPP bass loading, and resonance-controlled cabinet construction.

Advertisement

What makes the range compelling is the value equation. With the flagship Elysian 4R priced at $11,995 per pair in the U.S. and £6,999 in the UK, Wharfedale is competing in a category where many rivals now cost three to five times more and do not always offer more speaker for the money.

The lineup is missing a dedicated subwoofer, surround speaker, and height channel option, so it is not a complete home theater ecosystem. But as a high-end stereo range with a serious matching center channel, Elysian R looks like a very strong technical and financial argument. Not cheap, but increasingly rare in 2026: expensive for a reason.

For more information:

Where to buy:

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Pokemon Go Data Was Used To Help Train AI Systems Being Developed For Military Drones

Published

on

Pokemon Go players’ optional location scans reportedly helped train Niantic Spatial’s visual positioning system, which uses camera imagery and 3D maps to navigate when GPS is unavailable or jammed. According to DroneXL, that technology is now being paired with Vantor’s drone navigation software for military and intelligence use, raising questions about whether gamers understood that footage collected for in-game rewards could eventually support defense systems. From the report: The pipeline runs from a mobile game to the battlefield in three steps. Players scanned the physical world. Niantic Spatial turned those scans into a 3D map that lets a machine locate itself by sight when satellite signals fail. And in December 2025, Niantic Spatial announced a partnership with Vantor, the defense and intelligence firm formerly known as Maxar Intelligence, to fuse that ground-level system with Vantor’s aerial navigation software for use in GPS-denied operations.

I have spent years covering how drones lose their way the moment an electronic warfare unit switches on a jammer, a problem that has spread from the battlefield into civilian airspace, from Ukrainian workshops cycling through navigation generations to American programs scrambling for alternatives. The unsettling part of this story is not the technology. It is where the training data came from, and whether the people who supplied it would have agreed had anyone explained the destination. “Now as part of Scopely (the Saudi-owned company that acquired Niantic last year for $3.5 billion), Pokemon GO data is not shared with Niantic Spatial,” a company spokesperson said in a statement to Kotaku. “AR Scans collected through Pokemon GO were submitted voluntarily by players who opted into the feature and were subject to the applicable Terms of Service and Privacy Policy at the time. The discontinuation of AR scanning and the end of data sharing with Niantic Spatial were part of the transition planning associated with Pokemon GO’s move to Scopely.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025