Tech

OpenAI pauses Stargate UK as energy costs and copyright rules block the path

Published

6 hours ago

10 April 2026

In short: OpenAI has paused its Stargate UK data centre project, citing the high cost of industrial electricity in Britain and an unfavourable regulatory environment around AI copyright. The project, announced in September 2025 alongside Nvidia and Nscale, had planned to deploy 8,000 GPUs at sites in north-east England, scalable to 31,000 over time. OpenAI says it will move forward “when the right conditions” allow, though it has given no timeline. The pause is a significant setback for the UK government’s AI Growth Zones initiative and arrives as OpenAI prepares for a public listing.

What Stargate UK was supposed to be

Stargate UK was announced in September 2025 as a sovereign AI infrastructure project: a partnership between OpenAI, Nvidia, and British cloud provider Nscale to build data centre capacity in north-east England that would allow OpenAI’s models to run on local computing power. The sites earmarked were Cobalt Park near Newcastle and Blyth, both within the UK government’s designated AI Growth Zones, a framework the government had positioned as a centrepiece of its industrial strategy for artificial intelligence. The project was unveiled during US President Donald Trump’s state visit to Britain, giving it diplomatic as well as commercial significance. The initial phase involved off take of approximately 8,000 Nvidia AI processors, with an ambition to scale that to 31,000 GPUs over time, capacity that would have enabled OpenAI to serve critical public services, regulated industries such as finance, and national security partnerships without routing data through US-based infrastructure. OpenAI never disclosed the total investment figure associated with the UK project. The broader US Stargate project remains on track with data centre construction under way across the United States, backed by a $40 billion bridge loan SoftBank secured to finance its participation, making the UK pause a geographic exception rather than a signal of retreat from AI infrastructure spending overall.

The energy cost problem

The most concrete obstacle OpenAI identified is the cost of electricity in Britain. UK industrial electricity prices are among the highest of any IEA member state, more than four times those in the United States, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. For a data centre drawing 100 megawatts, that differential is not a line-item concern but a structural one: the economics of running large-scale AI inference workloads at a site where power costs four times as much as they do in Virginia or Texas are fundamentally different, and that gap compounds as capacity scales. The problem is not simply a matter of electricity tariffs. Grid connection requests in the UK surged from 41 gigawatts in November 2024 to 125 gigawatts by June 2025, with an estimated 75 gigawatts of that queue attributable to data centre projects. Buildings can be constructed in 18 to 24 months; grid connections take three to eight years. That mismatch means that even if a project clears the financial hurdle, it faces an infrastructure queue that the current regulatory and planning framework has not been designed to process at AI-infrastructure speeds. The UK government’s AI Growth Zones policy, published in November 2025, was intended in part to address exactly this bottleneck, but the zone designations do not resolve the underlying grid constraints, and OpenAI’s decision to pause suggests that the policy framework has not yet translated into the conditions that would make the investment viable.

The copyright sticking point

The regulatory concern OpenAI cited alongside energy costs points to a separate and more politically charged problem: the UK’s unresolved approach to AI copyright. UK lawmakers have been working to update the rules governing how AI models are trained on copyrighted material. The government’s preferred approach, a broad text and data mining exception with an opt-out mechanism for rights holders, was rejected by the majority of respondents to the government’s own consultation, with creative industries, publishers, and news organisations arguing that a broad exception would allow generative AI companies to train on their works without compensation or meaningful consent. The consultation produced no consensus, and the government has since delayed any legislative change. For OpenAI, which trains large language models on text scraped from the internet, the uncertainty about whether that training will be lawful, and on what terms, is a material business risk. A UK data centre is not simply a power facility, it creates legal jurisdiction. If the UK eventually adopts a copyright framework that restricts training data use more tightly than the US, operating infrastructure in Britain could expose OpenAI to liability or compliance costs that do not apply to its US operations. The pause allows OpenAI to wait for that regulatory picture to clarify before committing capital.

A pause, not a cancellation, and the IPO context

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

OpenAI’s statement was calibrated to leave the door open. “We continue to explore Stargate U.K. and will move forward when the right conditions such as regulation and the cost of energy enable long-term infrastructure investment,” the company said, framing the decision as contingent rather than final. The timing, however, is notable. OpenAI closed a $122 billion funding round at an $852 billion valuation in late March 2026, extending participation to retail investors for the first time in a move widely interpreted as groundwork for a public offering analysts expect as early as the fourth quarter of 2026. Companies approaching an IPO typically tighten their capital allocation discipline, avoid open-ended international commitments that could weigh on reported cash burn, and reduce exposure to projects with uncertain timelines. Pausing a data centre project that faces both energy cost headwinds and an unresolved copyright regime fits that pattern. The UK government, which had promoted Stargate UK as a signal of international investor confidence in Britain’s AI ambitions, described the decision as disappointing and said it remained in dialogue with OpenAI. OpenAI’s international Stargate expansion has not been without complications elsewhere either, its Abu Dhabi data centre plans drew an explicit threat from Iranian authorities amid escalating regional tensions, suggesting that sovereign AI infrastructure projects carry geopolitical risk profiles that are becoming a distinct factor in OpenAI’s site selection calculus. Meanwhile, Oracle appointed a new CFO this week to manage its $50 billion data centre construction programme as the central operating partner in the US Stargate project, a contrast that illustrates where AI infrastructure spending remains active and where it is being reconsidered. The year 2025 established infrastructure access and energy as the primary competitive variables in AI, and for the UK, OpenAI’s pause is a signal that it has not yet solved either.

Source link

Tech

Best VPN Apps for Android in 2026 (Tested and Ranked)

Published

9 minutes ago

10 April 2026

NewsAdmin

A VPN is one of the simplest and highest-impact privacy tools you can add to your Android phone. It encrypts all traffic leaving your device, masks your IP address, and prevents your mobile carrier, network administrators, and anyone sniffing public Wi-Fi from reading what you send and receive. The problem is that the market is saturated with hundreds of options — and some of them are actively worse than using no VPN at all.

This guide covers five vetted options for Android in 2026, chosen based on independent speed testing, verified no-log audit status, and real-world usability on Android. Pricing is accurate as of publication; use the links below to confirm current rates before subscribing.

Quick Take:Best overall: NordVPN — fast, independently audited, feature-complete Android app
Best for privacy purists: Mullvad — no email, no account details, flat pricing
Best free option: ProtonVPN Free — no data cap, no ads, no data selling
Best for streaming: ExpressVPN — fastest tested speeds, reliable geo-unblocking
Best for households: Surfshark — unlimited simultaneous devices on one subscription

What to Look for Before You Choose

The VPN market has two distinct quality tiers, and the difference isn’t always visible from app store screenshots. Before picking any option — paid or free — apply these four filters:

Independent no-log audit: Any VPN can claim it doesn’t log your traffic. Only a handful have had that claim verified by an external cybersecurity firm with access to their infrastructure. Prioritise providers that have passed at least one named, published audit.
Protocol quality: WireGuard is the current standard for speed and security. OpenVPN is battle-tested but slower. Proprietary protocols (NordLynx, Lightway) are acceptable when built on WireGuard or audited independently. Avoid providers that use only outdated PPTP or L2TP.
Kill switch: If the VPN connection drops, a kill switch halts all internet traffic until the tunnel is restored. Without it, your real IP and unencrypted traffic briefly expose themselves every time the connection interrupts — which happens more on mobile than on desktop.
Business model transparency: If the product is free and there is no visible paid tier, advertising revenue, or clear funding source — your data is the product. This is not speculation; it is documented by independent research.

1. NordVPN — Best Overall for Android

NordVPN is the most balanced option across speed, privacy verification, and Android-specific features. Its NordLynx protocol — built on WireGuard — delivered less than 20% speed reduction on a 250 Mbps connection in Security.org’s independently conducted Android VPN speed tests in early 2026. That puts it consistently above average for mobile use. NordVPN

On the privacy side, NordVPN completed its sixth independent no-logs assurance engagement in February 2026, with auditors given full access to servers, employee interviews, and infrastructure configurations. The result confirmed NordVPN stores no connection logs, IP addresses, traffic logs, or browsing activity.

The Android app includes a built-in ad and tracker blocker (Threat Protection Lite), split tunneling, and an automatic kill switch. It supports up to 10 simultaneous devices per subscription.

Server count: 6,000+ in 111 countries
Protocol: NordLynx (WireGuard-based), OpenVPN
No-log audit: Yes — 6 completed, most recent Feb 2026
Starting price: From approximately $3.09–$4.39/month (2-year plan)
Free tier: No — 30-day money-back guarantee only
Google Play rating: 4.3/5

Best for: Users who want a one-app solution that handles speed, privacy, ad blocking, and streaming without configuration.

2. ProtonVPN — Best for Privacy-First Users (and the Best Free Option)

ProtonVPN occupies a unique position: it is the only free VPN recommended in this guide, and it earns that position by having a completely different business model from other free offerings. The free tier is funded by paid subscribers, not by data collection or advertising. There is no data cap on the free tier — an extremely rare offering in this market.

ProtonVPN passed its fourth consecutive independent no-logs audit in 2025, conducted by Securitum. The company also publishes a transparency report documenting every legal request for user data — and because it logs nothing, it has nothing to hand over. Its apps are fully open source, meaning the code is publicly inspectable by any security researcher at any time.

Speed is near the top tier. Independent testing in 2026 showed ProtonVPN slowing download speeds by roughly 8% — compared to NordVPN’s 6% — a difference that is imperceptible in real-world use. The paid VPN Accelerator feature reportedly improves speeds on distant servers by 40–50%.

Server count: 9,500+ in 112 countries (paid); limited server selection on free
Protocol: WireGuard, OpenVPN, Stealth (obfuscated)
No-log audit: Yes — 4 completed, most recent 2025
Starting price: Free (no data cap) | Paid from approximately $2.99/month
Free tier: Yes — unlimited data, 3 server locations, 1 device
Open source: Yes — full client source code publicly available

Best for: Users who want the strongest privacy credentials, anyone on a budget who needs a genuinely trustworthy free tier, and anyone who wants to verify the code before trusting it.

Free tier limitation to know: The free tier restricts access to three server locations (US, Netherlands, Japan) and one device. For most basic privacy needs — securing public Wi-Fi, hiding traffic from your carrier — this is sufficient. For streaming geo-restricted content, you will need a paid plan.

3. ExpressVPN — Best for Speed and Streaming

ExpressVPN has held its position as a top-tier speed performer for several years, and that remains true in 2026. Its proprietary Lightway protocol delivered an average of 214 Mbps download and 207 Mbps upload in Android-specific testing — among the fastest recorded for any mobile VPN. CNET’s 2026 best Android VPN evaluation named it their top pick, citing outstanding streaming performance, geo-unblocking reliability, and ease of use.

The Android app is polished and simple — a single tap connects to the recommended server. It includes a kill switch, split tunneling, and threat manager (blocks known malicious domains). ExpressVPN operates from the British Virgin Islands, outside the EU and Five Eyes data-sharing arrangements.

Server count: 3,000+ in 105 countries
Protocol: Lightway (proprietary, audited), OpenVPN, IKEv2
No-log audit: Yes — multiple completed
Starting price: From approximately £1.99/month (promotional) | Regular from $6.67/month
Free tier: No — 30-day money-back guarantee
Google Play rating: 4.1/5

Best for: Users whose primary use case is streaming geo-restricted content, travelling users who need reliable connections across regions, and anyone who values a fast, no-configuration mobile experience.

One trade-off: ExpressVPN is among the more expensive options at its standard rate. The promotional price requires a long-term commitment; monthly plans cost significantly more. Factor in the full cost if you prefer flexibility.

4. Mullvad — Best for Maximum Anonymity

Mullvad is the most privacy-radical mainstream VPN available. It requires no email address and no personal information to create an account — you are assigned a 16-digit account number and that is your entire identity on the platform. Payment is accepted via cash by post, cryptocurrency, and card. No name, no email, no phone number is ever stored.

As Engadget’s 2026 budget VPN guide notes, Mullvad’s pricing has not changed since 2009: €5 per month, with no long-term contracts and no promotional pricing. What you see is what you pay. It supports up to five simultaneous devices.

Server count: 900+ in 46 countries
Protocol: WireGuard, OpenVPN
No-log audit: Yes — independently audited
Starting price: €5/month (flat — no annual discount)
Free tier: No — 30-day refund policy
Account signup: No email required

Best for: Journalists, activists, lawyers handling confidential cases, or anyone for whom account anonymity matters as much as traffic privacy. Also ideal for technically-minded users who dislike email-based accounts and marketing relationships with software vendors.

When not to use Mullvad: If your primary need is streaming, Mullvad’s smaller server network offers less geo-unblocking coverage than NordVPN or ExpressVPN. It is a privacy tool first, a convenience tool second.

5. Surfshark — Best Value for Multiple Devices

Surfshark’s defining advantage is its device policy: unlimited simultaneous connections on one subscription. Every other major VPN imposes a device cap (typically 5–10). If you need to cover a phone, tablet, family member’s device, laptop, and smart TV simultaneously, Surfshark removes that constraint entirely.

Speed and privacy credentials are solid — it uses WireGuard, maintains a no-log policy, and its Android app includes ad and malware blocking (CleanWeb), a kill switch, and split tunneling. It consistently appears in multi-product roundups from PCMag, TechRadar, and RTINGS as a strong second-tier option.

Server count: 3,200+ in 100 countries
Protocol: WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2
No-log audit: Yes — independently audited
Starting price: From approximately $2.19/month (2-year plan)
Free tier: No — 30-day money-back guarantee
Device limit: Unlimited

Best for: Users covering a whole household, multi-device power users, or anyone who wants a capable VPN at the lowest per-month price point without compromising on verified privacy credentials.

How These VPNs Compare

VPN	Best For	No-Log Audit	Free Tier	Starting Price	Devices
NordVPN	Overall best	Yes (6 audits)	No	~$3.09/mo	10
ProtonVPN	Privacy + free tier	Yes (4 audits)	Yes (unlimited data)	Free / ~$2.99/mo	10 (paid)
ExpressVPN	Speed & streaming	Yes	No	From ~£1.99/mo	8
Mullvad	Maximum anonymity	Yes	No	€5/mo (flat)	5
Surfshark	Multi-device value	Yes	No	~$2.19/mo	Unlimited

Free VPNs — A Risk Most People Underestimate

Warning: The majority of free VPN apps on the Google Play Store are not privacy tools. Many are data collection tools wearing a VPN’s interface.

A Zimperium zLabs study of more than 800 free VPN apps — published in October 2025 — found that nearly two-thirds relied on vulnerable code, leaked personal data, or provided no meaningful privacy protection. Separately, Tom’s Guide reported research projecting that by 2025, 80% of free VPN apps would embed tracking features, with data sales to third parties affecting up to 60% of the category.

The mechanism is straightforward: a free VPN app has no paid revenue. The cost of operating VPN infrastructure — servers, bandwidth, maintenance — is real. Something funds it. In many cases, that something is selling aggregated user traffic data to advertising networks and data brokers. Installing such an app to “protect your privacy” achieves the opposite.

The exception is ProtonVPN Free, listed above. It is funded by paid subscribers and has an independently verified no-log policy. Outside of that and a small number of other verified providers, treat free VPNs as a significant risk rather than a safe default.

VPN Protocols — What the Labels Mean

You will encounter protocol names in VPN settings and marketing. Here is what they mean in plain terms:

WireGuard: The current speed and security standard. Lean codebase (~4,000 lines vs OpenVPN’s ~400,000), fast handshakes, and strong cryptography. If available, use this.
NordLynx (NordVPN): NordVPN’s implementation of WireGuard, with an additional privacy layer to resolve WireGuard’s default IP assignment behaviour. Functionally WireGuard with an extra step.
Lightway (ExpressVPN): ExpressVPN’s proprietary protocol, designed for fast connection and reconnection on mobile networks. Independently audited. Performs comparably to WireGuard in speed tests.
OpenVPN: The long-standing standard. Battle-tested and extensively audited over many years. Slower than WireGuard on modern hardware but universally supported. Use it as a fallback if WireGuard is unavailable.
IKEv2/IPSec: Good for mobile use specifically because it handles network switches well (e.g. moving from Wi-Fi to mobile data). Reconnects faster than OpenVPN. Standard feature on many VPNs.
Stealth / Obfuscated protocols: Designed to disguise VPN traffic as regular HTTPS traffic to bypass VPN blocks — relevant in countries with active censorship or on networks that block VPN connections.

☐ Confirm the VPN has a published, independent no-log audit — not just a self-declared policy
☐ Check that the Android app includes a kill switch (not all apps enable it by default)
☐ Verify the app is downloaded directly from Google Play Store — not a third-party APK
☐ Enable the kill switch after installation before your first connection
☐ Test your real IP before and after connection using a browser-based IP checker
☐ For free VPNs: verify the provider has a paid tier and a published no-log audit before trusting it
☐ Enable auto-reconnect to restore VPN after network switches (Wi-Fi to mobile data)

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a VPN make my Android phone completely private?

No. A VPN encrypts the connection between your phone and the VPN server and hides your IP address from the sites you visit. It does not anonymise you at the app level — apps with your account information still know who you are. It also does not protect against malware already on your device. Think of it as one layer in a wider phone data security strategy — not a complete solution on its own.

Will a VPN slow down my Android phone?

Yes, to a measurable but usually minor degree. NordVPN’s NordLynx protocol showed less than 20% speed reduction on a 250 Mbps connection in independent testing. On a typical mobile connection of 50–100 Mbps, the real-world impact is rarely noticeable for browsing, messaging, or video calls. Streaming in 4K on a congested VPN server is where speed reduction becomes visible.

Is it safe to use a VPN on public Wi-Fi?

Using a VPN on public Wi-Fi is safer than not using one. Public Wi-Fi creates opportunities for man-in-the-middle attacks, traffic sniffing, and rogue hotspot impersonation. A VPN neutralises the first two. It does not protect against a rogue hotspot at the DNS level unless your VPN provides its own DNS servers, which most reputable providers do. Enable the VPN before connecting to public Wi-Fi, not after.

Can a free VPN be trusted?

Very few can. The Zimperium study of 800+ free VPN apps found nearly two-thirds were unsafe in measurable, documented ways. The only free VPN recommended in this guide is ProtonVPN Free — it has an independently audited no-log policy, no data cap, and a business model funded by paid subscribers rather than data collection.

Does a VPN protect me from hackers?

A VPN protects against network-level interception — eavesdropping on your traffic, recording your browsing activity from a network position, and revealing your IP address. It does not protect against phishing, malware, social engineering, or account compromise through password reuse. For those threats, you need a separate set of measures covered in our Android data security guide.

Do I need a VPN if I only use mobile data (not public Wi-Fi)?

On mobile data, your carrier can see your DNS queries, general traffic metadata, and browsing patterns. Many carriers sell anonymised (but not always reliably anonymised) data to third parties. A VPN prevents that. It also prevents your ISP from throttling specific services like video streaming based on traffic inspection. Whether that risk profile matters to you depends on your threat model — it is not an emergency for most users, but it is a real trade-off.

Which VPN should I choose if I just want something that works without setup?

NordVPN or ExpressVPN. Both have polished Android apps with single-tap connect, work reliably across all common Android versions, and handle network switches without manual reconnection. NordVPN is the better all-round value; ExpressVPN is the better streaming option.

Is it legal to use a VPN in the UK?

Yes — VPNs are legal in the United Kingdom and across the European Union. Using a VPN to access content that is itself illegal remains illegal regardless of VPN usage. Using a VPN to access geo-restricted streaming content (e.g., a US Netflix library from the UK) may violate streaming platform terms of service, though it is not a criminal matter.

Source link

Tech

Samsung’s next-gen foldable phones will inherit anti-scam call superpowers

Published

22 minutes ago

10 April 2026

NewsAdmin

Scam calls are evolving. Your phone is about to do the same. Samsung’s upcoming foldables are shaping up to get an intelligence upgrade, with Google’s Gemini-powered Scam Detection expected to expand to devices like the Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z Flip 8, and even a new Wide Fold variant. And yes, this time your phone may finally be better at spotting fraudsters than your patience at 7 PM after the fifth unknown call of the day.

Samsung joins the scam detection club

Google has been steadily building Scam Detection into its AI ecosystem, using Gemini to analyze live phone conversations and flag suspicious behavior as it happens. So, if a caller starts sounding like they’re scripting a heist movie, your phone gently steps in and says, “Maybe don’t trust this one.” On Pixel devices, this feature runs directly on-device, so it doesn’t send your calls to the cloud for analysis. That keeps things private while still letting AI do the heavy lifting of spotting patterns that usually scream scam.

Earlier this year, Samsung teamed up with Google to bring this capability to its own Phone app, starting with the Galaxy S26 series. That meant users didn’t have to rely on Google’s default dialer anymore to get scam protection baked in. There was a catch, though. The rollout has so far been limited to English-speaking users in the US, leaving many global users still answering unknown calls the old-fashioned way. Now, that seems to be changing.

Recent findings from the Phone by Google app suggest that Scam Detection is being prepared for Samsung’s next-generation foldables. The feature appears linked to several model families, including the Galaxy Z Fold 8, the Galaxy Z Flip 8, and a new Wide Fold device. These appear alongside a wide range of regional variants, suggesting a global rollout strategy. In short, Samsung isn’t just testing the waters here. It looks like it’s preparing to scale the feature across markets from day one.

Beyond the US-only limitation

Google’s Scam Detection already works in multiple regions on newer Pixel devices, including the Pixel 9 and Pixel 10 series. That suggests Samsung’s eventual rollout may not remain as geographically restricted as it is today. If anything, the inclusion of multiple regional variants in the code points to a broader ambition: making scam protection a standard feature rather than a market-specific perk. And honestly, it’s about time.

Samsung is expected to unveil its next foldables at its usual Galaxy Unpacked event around July 2026. While new hinges, displays, and processors will likely take the spotlight, this AI-powered call protection adds something more practical to the mix. And if Samsung and Google get this right, your next foldable might just be the smartest thing you use before you even unlock it.

Source link

Tech

Shark’s TurboBlade just got a major price cut ahead of the summer heat

Published

36 minutes ago

10 April 2026

NewsAdmin

Buying a fan before the first proper heatwave arrives is almost always the smarter move, and a 29% reduction on one of the more capable options on the market makes that decision considerably easier to justify right now.

That saving brings the Shark TurboBlade down from £249.99 to £176.99 at Amazon, cutting £73 off a fan that is built around a pull-and-accelerate airflow system designed to project air up to 20 metres in Boost mode.

Shark Turboblade on a grey background

Shark’s TurboBlade tower fan just got a major price cut ahead of the summer heat

Buying a bladeless tower fan before the first proper heatwave arrives is almost always the smarter move, and a 29% reduction on one of the more capable options on the market makes that decision considerably easier to justify right now.

View Deal