from the meet-the-new-boss dept

Now that streaming subscriber growth has slowed, we’ve noted repeatedly how the streaming TV sector is falling into all of the bad habits that ultimately doomed traditional cable TV.

That has involved chasing pointless “growth for growth’s sake” megamergers, imposing bottomless price hikes and new annoying restrictions on customers, undermining labor, and cutting corners on product quality in a bid to give Wall Street that sweet, impossible, unlimited, quarterly growth it demands.

Streaming TV prices hikes are coming so fast and furious, they’re outpacing many of the ridiculous traditional cable TV price hikes we saw during the cord cutting revolution:

“Over the course of the past 12 months, streaming rates have collectively risen 11.8 percent. The biggest year of increase was 2023, when the streamers shot up an average of 17.7 percent. A Hollywood Reporter analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows cable and satellite prices, by comparison, rose an annual average of 3.9 percent — excluding a deregulation surge of the late 1980s, when the index peaked at 14 percent. But that was a seismic shift provoked by a federal intervention rather than, say, because Widow’s Bay is a good show, or “we’re pretty sure we can get away with this.”

That shouldn’t really surprise anyone. Many of the same cable TV executives that enshittified traditional cable TV have moved on to streaming. And all the same quarterly growth pressures still apply. It’s not good enough to offer a good, affordable product people like; impossible scale is a siren song that, sooner or later, leaves many of these companies thrashed on the rocks.

There remain some notable positives though. Users are still free to subscribe to a streaming service, binge watch everything of interest, and then cancel to save money. That’s a big improvement from the traditional days of the bloated cable TV bundle.

Initially, streaming TV providers saw significantly higher customer satisfaction scores that big TV providers like Comcast. But that’s slowly changed over the last few years, as frustration with streaming TV grows and traditional cable TV providers try a little harder to improve. The latest American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) scores now show tech companies and traditional cable companies neck and neck:

“The results arrive during a period of rising subscription costs and mounting consumer fatigue. Deloitte’s 2026 Digital Media Trends survey found that 73% of streaming consumers are frustrated with rising prices, around 40% cancel at least one paid service each year, and 61% say they would cancel their favorite service if monthly costs rose by just $5. The average subscribing household spends $69 per month on four streaming video services.”

What happens next? Well you can see that with growth saturated, media giants have started shifting their attention to mergers and consolidation, just like traditional cable, phone, and media companies did. That means even more price hikes to pay off debt, significant layoffs, and corner cutting that results in lower-quality overall product.

I suspect once they’re more meaningfully consolidated and fully enshittified, they’ll find some creative way to make cancelling and resubscribing annoying, especially if the U.S. continues its steady trend of lobotomizing its regulators at the behest of corporate power.

That could most likely come in the form of telecom and media companies merging and then tethering your subscription tightly to wireless phone and internet discounts. Or simply going the AOL route and make cancellation annoying as hell. Who is going to stop them? The Trump FTC?

Ultimately this enshittification will result in more and more users flocking to free or cheap short form video alternatives. Or simply reverting to piracy, at which point (and I’m sorry to keep beating this dead horse) all the execs responsible will blame everything (VPNs, generational entitlement, China) but themselves.

Filed Under: competition, consumers, disruption, satisfaction, streaming, tv, video

Companies: amazon, disney, netflix

Soldiers still burn hours and calories moving water, ammunition, and radios across ground that wrecks ordinary trucks. Pack animals once filled that gap. Conventional electric robots often stall in the same mud, sand, snow, and rubble because their motors sit in the middle of the chassis and feed torque through gearboxes and shafts that lose grip the moment the surface turns ugly. ESOX Group finished a compact uncrewed platform, called the X2, this summer that tries to skip that failure.

Four in-wheel motors, specifically Theron motors, lie within the hubs and produce 1,000 newton meters of torque, 250 of which goes to each corner. That’s a lot of power without the need for a gearbox or driveshaft, or the additional weight that comes with them. Devan Roberts, their VP of defense programs, believes that this arrangement eliminates all known flaws in uncrewed ground vehicles and that nothing, no terrain, gradient, or payload, can halt it in its tracks. These motors are relatively quiet and cold to run, which is significant because heat and noise will not trip all of the sensors designed to detect engine signatures.

Amphibious Remote Control Car, 1:18 Monster Truck Toys for Boys RC Cars

• 2.4 GHz Remote Control Car – 1:18 scale cool design, waterproof RC truck toys made of premium material and sturdy, with LED lights, waterproof remote…
• High Quality & DIY Removable Toys RC Cars – This remote control monster truck structure design quality, flexibility and strength in one. The rc truck…
• All Terrain Amphibious Monster Truck – 4-wheel drive off-road design rc trucks for kids, with high-quality tires (shock absorption, strong grip…

The platform weighs 300 kilograms (about 661 pounds), and testers have already successfully loaded another 300 kilos to match the vehicle’s weight. Later on, they hope to increase it to 600 kilograms. An 8 kilowatt hour solid-state battery powers things, divided into two 4 kilowatt hour modules. ESOX asserts that this chemistry stores about twice the energy of lithium-ion cells found in fielded military vehicles, giving them a longer range or allowing them to battle for the same amount of time but with less weight. If that wasn’t enough, the batteries have a lesser fire danger than liquid electrolyte packs.

The chassis is much smaller than a typical four-by-four, and early test cars included 12 inch motors in a tank-steer layout, as well as some sophisticated airless tires designed to withstand punctures. ESOX OS software allows engineers to create a digital twin of the vehicle before they begin connecting gear together. Once deployed, the device begins transmitting live telematics and sensor data and accepts over-the-air updates for the duration of the vehicle’s life. All of the sensor packages, autonomous modes, and communication layers can be altered without affecting the motors or batteries, so you can essentially keep the core and construct your own versions around it.

ESOX Group is very new, having formed from Donut Lab’s defense division and combined with Finnish unmanned systems expert ESOX Aero in late 2025. They have teams in the UK, Finland, and Estonia, and their CEO, Dan Walmsley, previously worked at McLaren Automotive. They unveiled a tech demonstrator at CES 2026, and customer pilots began in late August, once the platform was declared ready. Any Tank Steer metrics, like as 120kW peak and over 200 kilometers of range, refer to the general design rather than the specific 1,000-newton-meter X2 configuration that is currently being tested.
[Source]

Apple has just announced its latest premium flagship, the iPhone 18 Pro, at the company’s recent Surprise and Shine event on Wednesday. With a starting price of $1,199, the iPhone 18 Pro has a few new features over its predecessor, such as a variable aperture camera and a faster A20 Pro chip. But that probably isn’t enough to prompt most people with an iPhone 15 Pro, 16 Pro or 17 Pro — all of which are still excellent.

If you’re still holding on to the iPhone 14 Pro, however, that’s another story. Not only has it been four years since that phone debuted, but it’s also the last Pro-level iPhone to have a Lightning connection; every iPhone since has a USB-C port. Lightning accessories and adapters still exist for now, but they’ll eventually be harder to find. Meanwhile, USB-C is a lot more ubiquitous. 

Beyond moving on from older hardware and aging batteries, upgrading to the iPhone 18 Pro is also a leap forward in terms of specs and features. Some things remain the same, but there are a lot of upgrades too. Four years make a pretty big difference in the phone world. 

Here’s a more detailed breakdown outlining the difference between the iPhone 14 Pro and the iPhone 18 Pro. 

Design and display

Display-wise, the 14 Pro and the 18 Pro might seem rather similar. The iPhone 14 Pro has a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, while the iPhone 18 Pro has a slightly bigger 6.3-inch OLED display, also with a 120Hz refresh rate. Both also have 460ppi.

There are a few notable differences, however. The iPhone 18 Pro does have 3,000 nits of peak brightness, while the iPhone 14 Pro has only 1,000 nits of peak brightness. The 18 Pro also features an upgraded Dynamic Island with additional features that can show three activities at once. 

As for design, the iPhone 18 Pro has an action button and a camera control button on the side, adding additional functionality to the phone. 

Cameras

The iPhone 18 Pro represents a pretty significant upgrade in the camera department, especially over the iPhone 14 Pro. The iPhone 14 Pro has three rear cameras: a 48-megapixel wide, a 12-megapixel ultrawide and a 12-megapixel telephoto. This was pretty advanced at the time, but Apple has added a lot of new camera features in the years since

The iPhone 18 Pro has three rear cameras, which are all 48 megapixels across the board. It also has a variable aperture, which offers additional flexibility, especially when shooting in low-light conditions. 

The same goes for the front-facing camera. While the iPhone 14 Pro has a 12-megapixel camera, the iPhone 18 Pro has an 18-megapixel one. On top of that, the 18 Pro has the Center Stage capability introduced with the iPhone 17 models that automatically switches between portrait and landscape orientations without needing to rotate your phone. 

Battery and performance

While Apple doesn’t disclose official battery specs in the US, we can surmise that the iPhone 18 Pro does have improved battery life over the iPhone 14 Pro. According to Apple, the iPhone 18 Pro delivers up to 36 hours of video playback per charge, while the iPhone 14 Pro has just 23 hours of video playback per charge. The iPhone 18 Pro has wireless charging of up to 25 watts, while the iPhone 14 Pro has MagSafe charging of up to 15 watts. 

Another huge leap between the two phones is in the performance department. While the iPhone 14 Pro ships with the A16 Bionic chip, the iPhone 18 Pro ships with the A20 Pro processor, which should result in faster apps, smoother multitasking and a superior gaming experience. 

Getting the iPhone 18 Pro is also a good option if you’re considering a phone with more storage. While the 14 Pro maxes out at 1TB of storage, the 18 Pro is available in a 2TB variant. You’ll have to pay a high cost for it ($2,399 retail), but at least it’s available if you want it. 

To further compare the iPhone 18 Pro and the iPhone 14 Pro, check out the comparison chart below.

Apple iPhone 18 Pro vs. Apple iPhone 14 Pro

I started my career with CNET all the way back in 2005, when the (original) Motorola Razrs were all the rage. Since then, I’ve written about everything from consumer electronics to internet culture for outlets like CNET, Engadget and Yahoo. Outside of work, I’m a big fan of baseball, board games, tabletop RPGs and improv comedy.

See full bio

Almost 150 politicians across Europe have been included on harmful deepfake pornography websites over the last few years, according to new research seen by WIRED. Some of the politicians, who are overwhelmingly women, have had their likeness included in explicit videos, while others have names and photos listed in disturbing database-like entries that can link to deepfake creation tools.

Analysis of around 160 domains that host deepfake abuse and other nonconsensual sexual content, by researcher Benjamin Shultz, has found that at least 138 women members of parliament (MPs) from 22 European Union countries have appeared or been mentioned on the sites. In contrast, only nine male MPs were referenced in any way. By Shultz’s calculations, it is 33 times more likely for women MPs to be targeted by deepfake ecosystems.

“Deepfake porn is part of a much bigger trend of online hate and intimidation against women and female politicians,” says Suzanne Kröger, a Dutch member of parliament with the Progressive Netherlands group, who was impacted. Kröger, who expressed anger at what the research uncovered, says the findings are “really deeply disturbing” and help to reveal the scale of abuse. “We are politicians, we have a platform and speak out,” Kröger says. “But meanwhile, there are millions of women victims of these criminal acts.”

The research, which has been published by German digital democracy think tank Agora Digitale Transformation, focuses on national members of parliament from all 27 countries in the European Union. Shultz, a fellow at Agora and the lead researcher at the American Sunlight Project, compiled the details of more than 5,800 members of parliaments across Europe in July and then used custom search engines to find where they appeared across the deepfake websites. (The research does not include members of the European Parliament).

Politicians from Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and France appeared on the websites the most, according to the findings, and the more senior a politician is, the more likely they were to be targeted. Shultz alerted all of the MPs individually and provided guidance on how the content may be removed. The websites also include depictions of celebrities, journalists, and other public figures, he says. WIRED is not naming the websites in order to not drive further attention to the abusive images.

Multiple researchers and lawmakers say that while politicians have been targeted with deepfakes for years, it can damage democratic practices and create chilling effects that may stop women and girls from becoming public figures. “This discourages women from taking office in the first place and also crowds these women out of public life,” Shultz says. “There’s so much evidence to support that this does real psychological damage. This also does reputational damage for the future if they want to fade out of politics and have another career.”

“Deepfake videos are used to intimidate politicians but also to belittle women,” says Sarah Dobbe, a Dutch Socialist Party MP, who was impacted. “It is very important that if a woman or girl is victimized in this way, she can get direct support if needed, and that the content is removed quickly.”

Across the sites he monitored, Shultz categorized multiple categories of abusive content or behavior. His results include instances where MPs appeared in content that was actively being hosted by the sites, indexed results where content had been removed, and also a number of profiles and “gateways” where potentially new content could be created.

Multiple websites hosted pages that include the names of MPs, official photos, and in some cases their social media profiles or personal information. Some included sections “rating” the women’s bodies, Shultz’s report says. Often next to these MP biographies were links to so-called nudifier apps or the websites’ own tools that claimed to digitally undress people. “It has all the images, all the information, and a direct link to the tool, and in three clicks you can generate,” Shultz says. “That’s just as bad as actually hosting the content.”

Four years after Daniel Riley first lashed remote-control crawlers to a backyard tether and asked whether any of them could rack up 100,000 scale miles, he ran the experiment again. This time the cars steered themselves. In the original 2022 test, a spinning line kept every vehicle on a circle, which also loaded one side of the drivetrain harder than the other and turned wear into a lopsided argument. For the Self Driving Edition, Riley laid a perimeter wire through his yard, borrowed the sensing idea from robot lawn mowers, and taught an Arduino to twitch a steering servo whenever a coil on the bumper drifted off the signal.

Later, he combined all of this into a package called Trail Tracer. A cheap crawler and an expensive crawler spent months crawling the same nasty track, grinding to a halt on their charge strips as rain, mud, rats, snow, and ice each tried to put an end to the runs. The competitors were an Exceed RC Mad Watt 10, a $169 top-of-the-line crawler with metal U-joints and a main gear that was a little too exposed for comfort, and a Stirlingkit YK6101, a $769 1/10-scale 6×6 with a top-notch all-metal chassis, portal axles, lockable diffs, a two-speed gearbox, and a 750-size brushed motor.

LEGO Technic Dodge Viper GTS-R Sports Car 42234

• RACE CAR BUILDING TOY – Kids can assemble their dream vehicle with the LEGO Technic Dodge Viper GTS-R Sports Car (42234) building toy for boys and…
• TOY CAR WITH AUTHENTIC DETAILS – Discover realistic features like a V10 engine with moving pistons, an opening hood and doors, a differential and an…
• FORZA HORIZON 6 UNLOCKABLE – Get a special LEGO Technic livery in the Forza Horizon 6 video game – please note that a copy of the game is required…

Riley was sure to keep the YK in low range, however, to prevent it from outrunning the wire. Building the track was its own mini-project. Wire segments were rewired (after the rats had bitten them to pieces, they had to be re-soldered and reburied). Then there were the turns, a nasty downhill run, and a swampy low place that caused the cars to oscillate all over the track, all of which required hours of controller tuning to perfect. To top it all off, the charge contacts were constantly sparking until he switched to a bench supply. Then there was his faithful lap timer, a spring-loaded board that recorded each pass. He also installed an FPV camera so he could watch from inside when the weather got bad.

Cheap hardware folded first. After the bolt in one of its gears had a bit too little thread and fell loose from its lock nut (fortunately not scored, so it wasn’t a death sentence), the Mad Watt’s open spur gear simply chewed itself bald on all the grit. Riley finally drove about 75 miles on that chassis, which is equivalent to 750 scale miles at 1/10 scale. The drivetrain ultimately failed. He changed gears and deemed it ordinary maintenance, which is quite generous if you’ve ever had a toy with its teeth sticking out in the mud.

The YK6101, on the other hand, simply kept trucking. By the fall, it had completed several thousand laps and a staggering 356 miles in the real world (or 3,560 scale miles, to give you a better sense) and was only beginning to show signs of wear in the form of extra steering slop and a bit of a wobble sliding down the hill when the controller was turned up to the utmost. The soft tires even broke through a few inches of ice. Of course, frozen ground helped for a time, but the thaw converted the track into soup, forcing Riley to dump a load of gravel, dirt, and concrete powder into the ruts to keep them from eating the axles.

Not a single car reached 100,000 scale miles. That’s a milestone equivalent to 10,000 real-world miles of crawling on a toy truck size, which would imply years of continuous use even if everything kept together, which it didn’t, but what the sequel actually proved was far more interesting. A tethered circle of wire is essentially a devious torture device. A wire-guided self-charging loop that is much more in line with how real vehicles live, as both sides of the drivetrain are worn down, the steering is constantly stressed, water and dirt find their way in through every small gap, and the only thing holding it together is whatever you’ve managed to reinforce the metal with.

Exposed gears wear out. Sealed gears, good steel shafts, and a chassis that can be easily disassembled into a plethora of spare parts make for a winning combination. Riley continues to manage the YK with a skeleton workforce, selling Trail Tracer devices so others can go lay a wire in their own garden, and the 100,000-mile mark remains, effectively a running joke that may become old news if someone simply refuses to give up. For now the interesting result is the gap. Seven hundred fifty scale miles on the bargain crawler. More than three thousand and counting on the 6×6. Same yard, same weather, same buried wire, and a very loud lesson about what you get when you pay for the metal.

A hot potato: Sony has argued in its ownership lawsuit that people don’t actually own their digital purchases. But that seems to contradict the 44 instances documented by the Consumer Rights Wiki, all of which show the gaming giant clearly stating that people do in fact “own” their games.

The collection spans PlayStation support pages, store listings, and official blog posts, with live links, archived snapshots, and highlighted screenshots showing exactly where Sony uses ownership language.

The project comes from the community around the Consumer Rights Wiki, founded by consumer advocate Louis Rossmann. Its collection covers support articles, promotional pages, store listings, and official blog posts, all showing that language suggesting ownership extends well beyond the checkout button.

One particularly clear example appears in Sony’s instructions for upgrading PS4 games to their PS5 versions. The page explicitly refers to an eligible “digital PS4 game you already own.” That leaves little room to suggest the wording applies exclusively to physical discs.

There’s also Sony’s explanation of its PlayStation Store ratings system. In an August 2025 blog post, the company said players “must own the game before submitting a rating.” It appears that ownership is a perfectly useful concept when explaining who gets to leave feedback.

The lawsuit was filed in June by four California customers who allege Sony’s checkout does not adequately disclose that their purchases grant revocable licenses. They say the licensing notice is small and insufficiently prominent, while buttons such as “Buy Now” and “Confirm Purchase” suggest ownership.

California’s AB 2426, which took effect in January 2025, restricts that language unless sellers obtain the required acknowledgment or provide a clear, conspicuous licensing disclosure. The dispute concerns what customers are told when paying for games, rather than whether buying a copy transfers the publisher’s intellectual property.

Sony argues its licensing terms make the arrangement clear and that “reasonable consumers would not be misled.” But the wiki’s examples certainly illustrate why people would think they do own these items.

Other storefronts have been more explicit about ownership. Steam added a shopping-cart notice in October 2024 explaining that digital purchases grant licenses. Ubisoft used a similar ownership defense after The Crew’s shutdown left paying customers unable to play.

For now, Sony is seeking individual arbitration, citing terms it says all four plaintiffs accepted without opting out. It has alternatively requested dismissal, with a hearing scheduled for October 1. Whether the wiki’s collection influences proceedings remains to be seen, but it certainly adds to the growing PR nightmare Sony has become embroiled in.

Apple has revealed the battery capacities of the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max for the first time. Apple doesn’t usually include battery capacity in new iPhone announcements. But with the EU Energy Label regulations, Apple must release the figures. Early Geekbench results have also revealed the speed of the A20 Pro processor, giving a clearer idea of what the new Pro models offer in battery life and performance.

iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max Battery Capacities Revealed

Apple has disclosed the new Pro range battery sizes through EU Energy Labels. The iPhone 18 Pro has a 4,056mAh battery, while the Pro Max has a 5,391mAh battery. This translates to an increase of 1.45% and 11.8%, respectively, compared with their predecessors. The comparisons should be made against their individual iPhone 17 Pro ranges. However, this comparison varies by region. EU versions have physical SIM slots, while eSIM-only models can use that space for larger batteries.

The EU Energy Labels give both models an A energy rating, B drop-resistance rating, and C repairability rating. Both phones also carry an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. Apple says their batteries can retain at least 80% capacity after 1,000 charge cycles. For eSIM-only models, Apple claims up to 36 hours of video playback on the Pro. The Pro Max can reach up to 45 hours. Real-world ratings are 24 and 30 hours, respectively. Both models can reach 50% charge in around 15 minutes. Apple also claims that five minutes of charging can provide around six hours of video playback.

A20 Pro Geekbench Performance and New Hardware

Early Geekbench 6.7 results give a first look at the A20 Pro’s performance. Two devices listed as iPhone 19,2 and iPhone 19,3 scored 4,719 and 4,612 points in single-core tests. Their multi-core scores reached 12,677 and 11,819 points, respectively. The two results average around 4,665 points in single-core and 12,248 points in multi-core. Compared with the average iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max results, the scores suggest around 21–23% higher performance.

Apple developed the A20 Pro using 2nm process technology. The A20 Pro CPU has six cores: two Supercores and four efficiency cores. The chip also has a seven-core GPU and a Neural Engine. The Neural Engine in this version has 32 cores. The memory bandwidth has been upgraded by 50%. According to Apple, CPU performance improves by 20% and GPU performance by 40%. These changes could make a difference in demanding games and on-device AI processing.

Apple has also optimized the A20 Pro chip packaging to improve cooling. Moreover, it uses an enlarged vapor chamber with three times the surface area of the iPhone 17 Pro. It has been claimed that this setup can help achieve up to 40% greater sustained performance. This matters because phones tend to decrease performance during prolonged use for gaming, video editing, or AI applications. Results for the latest Android chips are also unclear. For example, the Dimensity 9600 prototype achieved scores of 4,139 points in a single-core test and 13,285 points in multi-core tests. Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 results also remain inconsistent, so it is too early to name a clear performance winner.

iPhone 18 Pro vs Pro Max: Which Model Should You Buy?

The iPhone 18 Pro Max suits people who value battery capacity and usage time. It has a larger battery and longer battery life, making it suitable for users with higher demands. On the other hand, users have to cope with its size and high price. The iPhone 18 Pro is designed for people who want a smaller phone without sacrificing the A20 Pro’s performance. Furthermore, Apple promises that improved efficiency may give users battery time comparable to the iPhone 17 Pro Max. Ultimately, the choice comes down to battery endurance and phone size, rather than a major performance difference.

Bottom line: Micron just put the biggest employee payout in its history on the table in Taiwan, and the union at its Taoyuan plant rejected it the same day. That reads as irrational until you get into the fine print. The workers aren’t haggling over the size of this year’s check. They’re fighting over whether a formula exists at all – and the difference between those two things is worth roughly half a million dollars per head.

Following up on our report last month, Micron has now made its offer to employees demanding AI boom bonuses. Every Taiwan-based employee hired on or before August 29, 2025 gets a one-time cash bonus of NT$1 million, about $31,650, with prorated amounts for anyone who joined afterwards.

Direct labor staff are guaranteed minimum total cash compensation of NT$1.7 million, roughly $54,000, which Micron describes as the equivalent of 35 to 68 months of pay.

Entry-level engineers average NT$3.4 million in total rewards, about $107,000, most of it in cash and a smaller portion as equity at grant value. More than 60,000 employees globally are in line for fiscal 2026 rewards, which the company frames as following “an extraordinary year.”

It should be mentioned that the “68 months” of pay is a ratio against basic salary, not total compensation – and in Taiwan’s manufacturing pay structure, basic salary is a narrow slice that excludes shift differentials, overtime, and allowances.

As a response, the union’s statement said the package “sidestepped” discussion of the bonus system itself. What they want is structural: scrap the existing “Incentive Pay Plan” and replace it with a permanent mechanism allocating 15% of operating profit to worker bonuses, distributed quarterly rather than annually, plus a one-off payment equal to 83 months of salary for fiscal 2026.

Credit: App Economy Insights

The IPP is the real grievance. Micron’s Incentive Pay Plan has been paying out around 2.6 months of salary, under a cap that tops out near five months.

That’s what workers got in a year when quarterly revenue jumped 346% and the company banked $28 billion in profit in a single three-month stretch. Lin Jer-ray, who heads the Micron Wafer Technology Enterprise Union, has summed up the complaint plainly: profits went vertical, pay didn’t.

And the 15% figure isn’t a negotiating fantasy pulled from the air. The unions circulated a peer comparison to justify it. Samsung’s DS division distributes 10.5% of operating profit under the deal that called off an 18-day strike involving as many as 48,000 members in May. SK Hynix agreed last year to share 10% of annual operating profit for a decade. Domestically, Macronix pays 15% of net profit, Nanya 6%, Powerchip 5%, TSMC 4.7%, Winbond 2%. Micron trails all of them.

That comparison is also why the two sides are so far apart. SK Hynix’s 10% formula is on track to pay its workers somewhere around $547,000 each this year. Micron’s offer guarantees $54,000. The unions aren’t asking to be paid better than the industry, they’re asking to be at least in the same ballpark.

A second round of mediation is set for September 21. Taiwan law requires mediation before a legal strike, so if that session collapses, a formal strike vote follows. The two unions count somewhere between 10,000 and 12,000 members, out of roughly 15,000 Taiwan staff.

Nine days after that mediation, on September 30, Micron reports quarterly earnings it has already told investors will land near $50 billion in revenue. Taiwan produces 50-60% of Micron’s chips and the bulk of its HBM, which means a walkout would hit at the worst possible moment for the company. The Central Taiwan Science Park administration has warned that a stoppage could ripple out across the island’s chip supply chain and assigned staff to keep both sides talking.

Most analysts still expect a deal. The profit behind this year’s bonus is already made, and Micron can close most of the gap with money it’s currently generating, which is exactly how the Samsung and SK Hynix standoffs ended. In South Korea, some in the industry see the mess as a chance to win back engineers who left for Micron over the years.

For anyone shopping for memory, the stakes are simpler. DRAM supply is already tight and prices are expected to stay high well past 2027.

A hot potato: Once again, a warning about AI development resulting in a catastrophe has come from one of the people building these models. Anthropic boss Dario Amodei says that an AI-powered botnet swarm could take over the entire internet, and this scenario could become a reality in just six to twelve months. The CEO has also called for a slowdown in the developement of new AI models.

Amodei wrote his warning in a lengthy open letter. He said his theoretical botnet swarm could be here in under a year because of the accelerating rate of AI capability development.

Amodei said this botnet could cause hundreds of billions of dollars in damage, and that the scale of damage would continue to increase from there if AI becomes more powerful without the necessary guardrails.

The CEO adds that the idea of pausing or slowing AI has been floated as far back as 2023, but he believes it made little sense back then. Now, Amodei says slowing down development could bring an extra year or two before models reach critical levels of capability, giving companies more time to advance alignment and reduce the risk that something goes seriously wrong.

Amodei’s warning comes at a time when fears over AI are reaching a peak. Following the multiple incidents of agents going rogue, former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon warned that the AI race could end in human extinction.

Amodei’s call to slow the pace of AI development is being backed by both Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. “I’ve been sounding the alarm on AI for a long time,” Musk said, highlighting a 2014 post in which he said: “We need to be super careful with AI. Potentially more dangerous than nukes.”

– Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 13, 2026

“I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier,” Altman said. “Committing to having independent evaluators with employee-like access is a great idea, and we will do the same. We’ll have more to share soon.”

– Sam Altman (@sama) September 12, 2026

Evan Hubinger, an alignment science lead at Anthropic, added his voice to the debate. He agreed with Coxon’s assessment and said there was more than a 10% chance of AI wiping out all humans in the next decade.

Beyond the digital dangers, it was recently reported that an Iran-linked group used Anthropic’s Claude to assist with military reconnaissance and generate targeting recommendations for US naval forces in the Middle East. It was also discovered that Houthi rebels used Claude Code to code ballistic missile guidance systems.

Anthropic also said it identified possible attempts by suspected state-sponsored researchers to exploit its Claude AI model to develop biological weapons. The users were locked out after repeated attempts triggered Claude’s built-in safety protocols.

The concerns over these incidents and the race toward developing superintelligence have seen Senator Bernie Sanders propose the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act. If it became law, those who violate its terms could face up to 20 years in prison: a similar punishment to the penalty for unlawfully developing nuclear weapons.

– Sen. Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) September 12, 2026

Calling for a slowdown in the development of AI isn’t very helpful if nobody does it. Companies worry that if they slow their pace and others don’t, they’ll get left behind. Similarly, countries say that they won’t be able to compete with rivals if limits are placed on development. Not that any of this will matter if we’re all dead, of course.