With a weighty base, an adjustable Qi2/MagSafe charging pad, and a fold-out Apple Watch charger around the back, this Zens 2-in-1 is ideal for folks with an iPhone and Apple Watch. The Apple Watch pad folds out of the back, tucking your watch out of sight and allowing room for the strap to droop. The pad works great with StandBy mode. You can also fold the pad flat and charge AirPods or other phones if you need to, just not at the same time as your iPhone. Sadly, this has a barrel port for the provided cable and charger (USB-C would be better), the Apple Watch charger can be a little stiff and tricky to fold out, and it’s pricey, but I love the quality, look, and feel.
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Belkin
Advertisement
UltraCharge 2-in-1 Foldable Magnetic Wireless Charger (Qi2 25W)
Belkin’s UltraCharge 2-in-1 unseats our previous favorite, the BoostCharge Pro 2-in-1, which is still a great option. However, the latest model features Qi2 25W charging support to charge compatible devices even faster. It also has a folding design, allowing you to take it with you on the go, but it also works great as a permanent charger for your desk or nightstand. Over on the back, there’s a spot to place AirPods or any wireless earbuds with wireless charging. What’s also great is the spare USB-C port—you can pop in a cable to charge your Apple Watch at 5 watts (or another device); it just won’t charge very fast. (Belkin also has a 3-in-1 version of this model if you want a dedicated spot for the Apple Watch.) Best of all, Belkin includes a very compact 45-watt power adapter and a USB-C to USB-C cable, which is better than many other wireless chargers that cost more. It’s a nifty little thing, and looks great in blue. —Julian Chokkattu
Advertisement
iOttie Velox Duo for $33: This was our 2-in-1 pick for a while. The black-and-gold combo looks great, the magnet is strong, and there’s a weighted base. On the downside, it only charges iPhones at up to 7.5 watts. The permanently attached USB-C cable is a good length, but you do have to provide a wall adapter.
More 3-in-1 Chargers to Consider
We have tested several other 3-in-1 Apple charging stations. Here are a few we liked:
Photograph: Simon Hill
Noco X Grid XDS3 for $130: Well-made, with an eye-catching design, this 3-in-1 charger has a wide base that’s great for stability. It’s easy to remove your iPhone one-handed too, though it does have a relatively large footprint. It’s a bit bulky to travel with. You can stick your Qi2 phone to the pad in portrait or landscape, and the large bottom 5W pad is suitable for AirPods or even a second phone. It supports Apple Watch fast charging, but I didn’t like the way my Apple Watch tended to tilt to one side, and the charging pad positions are fixed (you can’t change the angle). You get the adapter, generous 6.5-foot braided USB-C cable, though, and plug adapters for different countries in the box.
Twelve South HiRise 3 Deluxe for $100: Twelve South’s 3-in-1 is an elegant wireless charger for the nightstand and gives the iPhone plenty of breathing room to rotate it to landscape mode and take advantage of StandBy. I like that the iPhone charger can swivel up and down. On the base is a fast charger for the Apple Watch that you can flip up, and the back has a spot for the AirPods or another wireless earbuds case. It’s nice and weighty and doesn’t slide around easily. It comes with a proprietary, removable charging cable, along with a charging brick, and international plug adapters for the US, UK, EU, and AU.
Advertisement
Photograph: Simon Hill
Anker Prime 3-in-1 Charging Station for $150: Sporting a tree design similar to our top pick from Belkin, the very latest Qi2 25W charging, fast Apple Watch charging, active cooling, and an interactive display, this is perhaps the most feature-packed 3-in-1 charger on the market. You can connect via Bluetooth and configure in the app to set wallpapers for the clock, schedule night mode to dim the display and turn off the cooling, and track your charging stats in a table. I’m just not sure it’s worth the premium. The finicky touch display is flat, so you have to sit up to see it, and it looks a bit cheap to me. It also feels superfluous when your iPhone already offers Standby mode.
Belkin BoostCharge Pro 2-in-1 Wireless Charging Dock with MagSafe for $112: This was our old 2-in-1 pick for iPhone and Apple Watch. I like the soft-touch finish, the pad on top can move through 70 degrees, and the shelf for your Apple Watch works with any strap. The braided USB-C cable is permanently attached, but you get a 30-watt wall charger in the box. I don’t remember having issues when I first tested, but using it again, I found the weight of the camera end of my iPhone 14 Pro caused it to slowly droop when in StandBy mode. It’s also kinda pricey.
Zens Office Charger Pro 3
Photograph: Simon Hill
Zens Office Charger Pro 3 for $85: I’m a fan of some of the interesting, out-of-the-box designs that Zens turns out, but this 3-in-1, while well-made and perfectly functional, doesn’t really stand out. It’s Qi2 certified (15W for iPhone, 5W for Apple Watch, 5W for AirPods), looks nice, and comes with the cable and charger, though it has a barrel port.
Advertisement
Lululook 3-in-1 Charging Station for $60: This is a perfectly competent 3-in-1 with Qi2 certification (15W for iPhone, 5W for Apple Watch, 5W for AirPods). It’s compact, you can angle the iPhone pad, and I like the gold finish of my review unit, but I prefer the Twelve South above, or the ESR if you don’t want to spend as much.
Belkin BoostCharge Pro 2-in-1 MagSafe-Compatible Wireless Charging Pad for $80: Qi2 support provides magnetic alignment for your iPhone and delivers 15 watts of charging, and there’s a spot for AirPods on this compact dual pad. A USB-C port allows you to charge something else, such as an Apple Watch, and you get a 5-foot USB-C cable and 30W power supply in the box. There is also a 3-in-1 pad ($110) that adds an Apple Watch charger on the right side.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Nomad Base One Max for $150: This was our 3-in-1 pad pick, but stock is running low, and it is being discontinued. The MagSafe charger keeps your iPhone out of sight and supports 15-watt charging, the Apple Watch charging puck sticks up for Nightstand mode, but it’s not a fast charger. I tried it with a loop band and a normal strap, and I could fit the AirPods Pro case in the spot behind the Apple Watch puck to recharge it just fine. The metal chassis is heavy and, paired with the anti-slip rubber base, this thing stays put. It comes with a 2-meter USB-C to USB-C cable, which is great if you want to plug it into your new iPhone 16 to juice it up faster, but I wish it came with a 30-watt charging adapter. Nomad sells this one that we’ve tested and like.
Advertisement
QDOS SnapStand 3-in-1 for £80: This clever design feels sturdy and comes flat, and you can fold out and angle a magnetic pad for charging your iPhone (StandBy mode works fine). There’s a pop-out Apple Watch charger around the back, and the base has a pad for your AirPods. You get a black USB-C cable, but you’ll need a charger (at least 25W). I like that it’s partly made from recycled materials, and it folds away very neatly, but the charging speeds are relatively slow (7.5 watts for the iPhone and 2.5 watts for the Apple Watch).
Anker MagGo Wireless Charging Station Stand for $90: This good-looking 3-in-1 charging tree is more affordable than our top pick, boasts Qi2 certification for 15-watt charging, and comes with a charger and cable. It just misses out on a place above because of the offset pad for the Apple Watch. It is slippery, so your Apple Watch may tilt, though I never had an issue with it not charging. Anker included stickers to combat this, but they are a fiddly and inelegant solution. It’s also a shame that the main pad for your iPhone is fixed, so you can’t adjust the angle. But these are minor gripes.
Anker 3-in-1 Cube with MagSafe for $90: This dinky, dense, 2.5-inch cube from Anker was our previous compact pick. It has a MagSafe pad on top (15 watts), and the top section hinges to a 60-degree angle, revealing a charging surface for your AirPods. The wee pop-out shelf on the side has a built-in Apple Watch fast charger. You get a 5-foot cable and a 30-watt charger in the box.
Advertisement
Satechi 3-in-1 Magnetic Wireless Charging Stand for $130: This compact, attractive 3-in-1 is a little smaller than the Belkin, so it doesn’t take up too much room, and it folds down compactly for travel. The aluminum build is attractive and sturdy (the iPhone mount is made of stainless steel). This is on reviews editor Adrienne So’s bedside table, and it recharges her Apple Watch Ultra 2 from 70 percent to full in around 30 minutes.
Case-Mate Fuel 3-in-1 Foldable for $50: Finished in a classy gray material, this 3-in-1 charges an iPhone in a case or any Qi smartphone, and it’s easy to fold flat and pack in a bag. It also has a built-in Apple Watch charger and a spot for AirPods. A cable and a 45-watt charger are included. I also tested the solid Case-Mate Fuel 4-in-1 ($150), which is quite good, but the unnecessary LEDs and Fuel logo put me off.
Best 4-in-1 Chargers
Zens 4-in-1 Modular Wireless Charger with iPad Charging Stand for $78: If you also own an iPad, why not a 4-in-1 charging station? Zens’ modular design has a main stand for your iPad, a MagSafe pad in front to float your iPhone, and a slight indentation to charge AirPods below. The Apple Watch charger is a separate section that attaches magnetically (on either side) and holds your Watch in horizontal Nightstand mode. It feels durable with a grippy, rubbery, flecked black finish made from recycled plastic. You get a 65-watt power adapter, power cable, and adapter plugs for the US, UK, and EU, which is quite handy. The main drawback with this is the large size, and you have to connect a cable to the USB-C port on the side to charge your iPad.
Journey Glyde 4-in-1 Portable Charger for $170: Former reviews editor Adrienne So almost voted for this multidevice MagSafe power bank to get a separate recommendation until she noticed the price. It’s a 10,000-mAh-capacity power bank that can charge up to four devices at a time and uses the Qi2 charging standard. However, our pick for this spot is so much cheaper, and the Glyde does not have a kickstand.
Advertisement
Scosche Baselynx 2.0 Modular Charging Station for $90: What if three spots are not enough? Scosche has you covered with this modular charging station. The basic stand is a 2-in-1 for your iPhone and AirPods, but you can add an Apple Watch charger, a toast rack-style vertical station with USB-C ports, or even an AC outlet with USB-C port, for a big combined charger ($220). The trouble is, it gets quite big and expensive as you add modules, and I don’t love the way it looks, but it’s a neat idea.
Avoid These Chargers
Photograph: Simon Hill
Not every charger will be a winner. Here are the ones we didn’t like.
Infinacore T3 Pro: The T3 Pro is a 3-in-1 stand that looks and feels very cheap, and it got warm when charging my iPhone. Its saving grace is that it is cheap. It also has Qi2 certification and works with StandBy mode. I also tried the fold-out triple pad Infinacore T3 Wireless Charging Station. Aside from the ugly plastic design, the weak magnets meant it did not work well when folded into the triangular configuration (this also blocks a pad).
Advertisement
Groov-e Asteria Wireless Charging Station with Alarm Clock: There’s a wee clock on the front of this charging station, which can accommodate an iPhone, AirPods on a pad around back, and an Apple Watch up top. It feels and looks very cheap, slides around a little too easily, the magnet is weak, and the clock seems redundant when you can set your iPhone in StandBy mode. I also tried the Triton 3-in-1 folding pad, and it was okay. They are very affordable, but you must provide your own power adapter.
Zike 3-in-1 Z557C Stand: This 3-in-1 charger works perfectly well, but there are several better options above. The iPhone pad allows for StandBy mode but is not adjustable. The Apple Watch pad flips up or can be laid flat, and there’s a spot for AirPods on the gray felt pad. It has a barrel port, so you must use the supplied power adapter. What I really dislike about this charger is the ridiculously bright, utterly pointless white LED on the front that stays on the entire time.
Alogic Matrix Ultimate: This 3-in-1 charger has a folding design, supports fast charging, includes a detachable 5,000-mAh power bank, and comes with a nice pouch, but it is kinda bulky, and the white finish picks up dust and smudges very easily. I have also had issues with other Alogic batteries failing and not supplying the stated capacity.
Advertisement
STM Goods ChargeTree Go: This charging tree station folds flat and can charge a trio of Apple gadgets. But there’s no quick-charge support, my Apple Watch kept sliding out of place during the night, and there’s no adapter included. It’s not cheap either.
A Quick Primer on MagSafe
Most of the wireless chargers in this guide are MagSafe wireless chargers or Qi2 certified. That means they take advantage of the magnets embedded in the back of the iPhone 12, iPhone 13, iPhone 14, iPhone 15, iPhone 16, and iPhone 17 range. I cannot stress this enough: If you buy a case, ensure it is aMagSafe case. We have several third-party options in the linked case guides above. A normal iPhone case will weaken the pull of the magnets in the device and will not stick to MagSafe accessories well.
What’s the point of MagSafe? You don’t have to worry about misalignment with the wireless charger, meaning you won’t wake up to a dead iPhone. Technically, this perfect alignment enables chargers to deliver faster 15-watt charging. MagSafe is also available in the AirPods charging case (depending on your model). Apple’s AirPods and AirPods Pro with the wireless charging case will work with nearly all of the standard Qi wireless charging pads on these chargers (as will many third-party wireless earbuds), but if you have AirPods with MagSafe, then you can hook them up to the magnetic mounts as well. If you don’t have a MagSafe iPhone, then your device won’t be able to attach to these chargers, though we do have some recommendations for older iPhones (and the iPhone 16e).
Advertisement
Qi2 is the latest wireless charging standard, and Apple worked with the Wireless Power Consortium to develop it. Compared to the original Qi standard, it brings MagSafe-style magnetic charging, faster charging rates, and improved efficiency—but where MagSafe is an Apple technology designed for Apple products, any device can support Qi2. Apple updated the iPhone 12 and newer to support Qi2, so Qi2 should be a term you look for when shopping for a magnetic wireless charger. Qi2 Android phones are still thin on the ground right now—it’s officially available in Google’s Pixel 10 series—though Qi2 Ready phones add magnets using a compatible case. Expect more Qi2 Android phones soon. A Qi2 charger can charge your iPhone and any other Qi2 phones.
While Qi2 charging generally goes up to 15 watts, the Qi2.2 update, branded as Qi2 25W, can go up to 25 watts. But support for Qi2 25W is currently very limited, and includes the iPhone 17 range and the Pixel 10 Pro XL.
StandBy mode was introduced in iOS 17. When you place your iPhone on a charger in landscape orientation, it will turn the screen into a dock of sorts, showing the clock (with different designs you can choose from), photos from your library, or widgets. If you have an iPhone that supports an always-on screen, you can choose to have the display automatically turn off after some time when the iPhone isn’t in use or if the room is dark. Head to Settings > Standby to customize it.
Nightstand mode has long been around on the Apple Watch. Basically, when the watch is sitting upright and charging, the clockface will stay on so you can always tell the time. You can customize this on your Apple Watch by heading to Settings > General > Nightstand mode.
Innovega’s Gen One smart glasses capture the scene with a camera and project an enhanced image onto transparent displays to help people with low vision see more clearly. (Innovega Image)
Innovega, a company known for its augmented-reality contact lens technology, has turned its focus to a different product for now: smart glasses for people who are visually impaired.
The market: nearly 300 million people worldwide who’ve lost a significant amount of their vision, leaving them unable to read a menu, for example, or recognize a face across the room.
The product, which Innovega calls Gen One, looks like an ordinary pair of glasses and weighs under 70 grams. A camera in the frame captures the scene in front of the wearer. Software tuned to that person’s specific vision condition adjusts magnification, brightness, contrast and sharpness. The result appears on transparent micro-OLED displays over each eye.
When the displays are off, the wearer looks through clear lenses. A tap on the frame or a voice command brings the enhanced view up. The glasses tether to a smartphone for processing.
The goal is to “substantially change the quality of life and independence of tens of millions of people in the U.S. and hundreds of millions globally,” said Steve Willey, Innovega’s CEO and co-founder, and the former president of laser-projection company MicroVision.
Advertisement
How they got here: GeekWire has been tracking Innovega for many years, since finding the company’s booth in 2012 at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.
The company, founded in the Seattle region, has spent years developing high-tech contact lenses to let wearers focus on tiny displays built into eyeglasses, creating an augmented reality experience in a form factor far lighter than a headset. It won contracts from DARPA and the U.S. Army, and raised early funding from Tencent and other investors.
Along the way, the company was waiting for the industry to unfold in a way that would support its approach. But about two years ago, Willey took stock. Microsoft was backing away from HoloLens. Snap and Google had yet to ship consumer AR glasses. Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses were popular but lacked a visual display at the time.
So they went in a new direction.
Advertisement
“We said, why don’t we just pick the most simple application you could imagine?” Willey recalled. “And it’s just a person who has poor vision, who wants to have good vision.”
At the same time, the company concluded that only a fraction of its target market would be willing to wear contact lenses. That’s how it ended up going with glasses alone.
The approach: The specification for a visually impaired or legally blind person turned out to be radically different from the specification for a gamer. Someone who has lost their central vision doesn’t need 4K resolution and a 100-degree field of view. They need personalized magnification, brightness, and contrast, in a device they’d actually wear all day.
The resulting product is more like a regular pair of glasses, not a bulky headset.
Advertisement
Innovega expects about three hours of active use on a charge, but the glasses would be usable for a full day, since the display only switches on when the wearer needs to use it.
The company has pre-sold more than 100 pairs of the Gen One at $2,950 each through what it calls its Founder Series, with buyers paying full price for first access. It’s now taking orders for 1,000 more, and aims to begin commercial delivery in early 2027. Pre-orders are fully refundable until the glasses ship.
Innovega says it has signed a manufacturing agreement with Quanta Computer, the Taiwanese contract manufacturer that builds products for Apple, Meta, and Google. Willey described the partnership as unusual for a company of Innovega’s size. The company says it has committed $1 million to Quanta and other partners to finalize a design it can scale.
The company has filed more than 75 patents, domestic and international, and has completed about $6 million in contract work over its lifetime, including a variety of projects for the U.S. defense community, Microsoft, and Oakley.
Advertisement
The team: Innovega has about 20 people, including employees and contractors. Its clinical and engineering facilities are in San Diego, with administration, marketing, and active advisors in the Pacific Northwest.
Technical leaders include Arthur Zhang, CTO, a former senior manager of system architecture in Apple’s Vision Products Group, where he helped ship the first generation of Apple Vision Pro. Jay Marsh is chief engineer, and the hardware lead is Sang Lee, a former engineering manager in Apple’s Technology Development Group.
The business team includes Corrinalyn Guyette, partnerships; Vijay Raghavan, fractional CFO, a former Microsoft controller; and Bambo Sofola, business strategy, a former partner general manager of software engineering in Microsoft’s Devices and Experiences group.
Funding: About a third of the company’s roughly $25 million in total capital has come from strategic investors, including Tencent. Another third came from family offices and high-net-worth individuals. The remaining third, about $9 million, has come through crowdfunding, spread across approximately 4,000 shareholders. The company plans to raise $10 million to $20 million this year to go toward product manufacturing, launch, marketing, and distribution.
Advertisement
What’s next: After the launch of the Gen One to people who are visually impaired, the company plans to add applications for hearing impairment and cognitive or memory support.
The company’s contact lens technology could return as part of Gen Two, which Innovega says would deliver a much wider field of view, improved vision, and lighter eyewear.
In addition to its commercial initiatives, Innovega says it recently launched a related nonprofit, Vision for Humanity, focused on the low-vision community.
Watch Bolivia vs Scotland live streams as Steve Clarke’s side look to build on their 4-1 friendly win over Curaçao by overcoming a Bolivian team that failed to qualify for the 2026 World Cup after losing 2-1 to Iraq in an intercontinental playoff.
Scotland delivered the perfect send-off to their fans last week at Hampden as they hit minnows Curaçao for four. There were plenty of positives for Clarke and his coaching team, with Lawrence Shankland scoring twice, 19-year-old Findlay Curtis scoring his first international goal and Tyler Fletcher delivering an accomplished performance on his debut.
However, there were also some negatives, including a slow start, some poor defending and the loss of Billy Gilmour to injury. The classy midfielder is now out of the World Cup and has been replaced by 19-year-old Fletcher, who has just two senior appearances for Manchester United to his name.
Advertisement
While Bolivia missed out on a World Cup place, they proved during qualifying that they are no pushovers, with their most impressive performance coming late last year when they secured a deserved 1-0 victory over Brazil.
Read on for our guide on where to watch Bolivia vs Scotland live streams online, on TV and from wherever you are, potentially for FREE.
Can I watch Bolivia vs Scotland for free?
Yes, you can stream Bolivia vs Scotland for free in the UK on BBC iPlayer.
A VPN is handy piece of software that can make your device appear as if it’s back in your home country, so you can unlock your usual service. The best VPN right now? We recommend NordVPN – it does everything and comes with up to a 75% discount and an extra three months for free.
How to watch Bolivia vs Scotland live streams in the US
Away from the US during the match? Use NordVPN to watch your home coverage of the game.
How to watch Bolivia vs Scotland live streams in the UK
(Image credit: Future)
As mentioned above, you can watch the Bolivia vs Scotland game for free in the UK as it is being shown on BBC2 and via the streaming service, BBC iPlayer.
Outside the UK right now? Use NordVPN to access your home coverage of the game.
Advertisement
Can I watch Bolivia vs Scotland live streams in Australia?
(Image credit: free)
Unfortunately, it doesn’t look as though the Bolivia vs Scotland match has been picked up by any broadcasters in Australia.
We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Not on the list: Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s GPUs. (AI-Generated Image by Google Gemini)
For my 10th column in the “Etzioni on AI” series, I want to share ten commandments for AI startups, preceded by timeless classics that still apply. They draw on my work with founders at the AI2 Incubator, Madrona, and my own experience as an AI founder from Netbot (1996) to Vercept (2024).
To see what’s different for AI startups, let’s warm up with ten commandments for startups in general, which fold in the wisdom of startup stalwarts such as Vinod Khosla, Reid Hoffman, and Eric Ries. If you already know the classics, jump straight to the AI commandments.
1. The real risk is regret. It’s sitting in the stands at 60 and realizing you never stepped up to the plate.
2. Choose your co-founder as carefully as a spouse. You may end up spending more time with your co-founder in the early years. And founder breakups are also very painful.
3. Maximize your odds of success, not your ownership stake. Don’t end up owning 99% of nothing. The right investor, incubator, or hire will add far more value than cost.
Advertisement
4. Raise on the story. Investors are buying the company you could become. As Khosla puts it: “Don’t subvert your story in service of logical order.”
5. Solve a real problem. Is it a painkiller or a vitamin? Startups sell painkillers.
6. Talk to your customers early and often. Your assumptions are wrong until a customer proves otherwise; an ounce of data is worth a pound of intuition. A scrappy experiment engaging users settles arguments that could otherwise take months to resolve.
7. Focus, focus, focus. The hardest word for some founders is “no.” Say it to good ideas so you can execute the one great one. If your product is both a dessert topping and a floor wax, it’s neither.
Advertisement
8. Build the rocket while you’re flying it. You launch without every answer in place and iterate quickly to figure the rest out.
9. Be ready for a rough ride. A startup can seem like a series of near-death experiences. The winners are the ones who refused to quit.
10. Beware of consultants. Remember the ham-and-eggs adage: the chicken is involved, but the pig is committed. You want a committed team. Anyone running a meter has incentives misaligned with yours.
Here are a few commandments that didn’t make the cut: hire carpenters, not architects; hire slowly, fire fast; know your numbers cold, especially your burn rate.
These classics still rule, but it’s time to add ten AI commandments.
1. “We’re an AI company” is no longer a differentiator. It’s table stakes. Tell the story: what’s the pain point? Who’s the customer? How do you make money? Why now?
2. AI technology is not enough. As Madrona’s Matt McIlwain puts it, “the most important AI model is the business model.” And you have to deliver against that model — vision without execution is hallucination.
Advertisement
3. Don’t put lipstick on a model. If your company is a skin-deep gloss over someone else’s API, the frontier labs will eat you alive. They have the model and the distribution. You have neither. Build where they won’t (or can’t) go.
4. Own your data, but don’t mistake it for the moat. Proprietary data helps, but it’s not the promised land. What matters is the flywheel: Waymo learns from every mile its cars drive, and the learning makes the next mile better. Build that loop.
5. Velocity is the new moat. AI has collapsed the cost of being smart. The edge belongs to whoever is smart faster. As a16z’s Bryan Kim writes, “momentum is the moat.”
6. Embed in the workflow. The application your customer opens at 9am and closes at 6pm is the one they can’t switch off. Become that. Or quietly take over the one they already use. AI coding makes it cheaper than ever to recreate the application layer from scratch.
Advertisement
7. Distribution is the scarce resource. Building an AI product has never been cheaper. Getting it in front of buyers has never been harder. The thousand companies competing for your customer won’t lose on features. They’ll lose on reach. Distribution deserves equal billing with product from day one.
8. Don’t marry a model. The frontier model that wins your demo today will be third-best in six months. Build the stack so you can make an easy change if the chemistry fades.
9. Inference is the new COGS. Every query costs real money, and the cost scales with every user. Bessemer puts it bluntly: “If the math doesn’t work at 10 customers, it won’t at 1,000.” Know what your product costs you before you grow.
10. Personal relationships still matter most. AI doesn’t earn trust. It won’t take your call at midnight or defend you to the board, and it won’t be there when you need a bridge round.
Advertisement
Seattle is a phenomenal place to live by these commandments: AI House has opened on the waterfront; new funds have been raised; and hundreds of startups are thriving.
President Donald Trump said on Friday that he’s spoken to AI companies about striking deals “where the American people can benefit from the success of AI.”
CNBC said some of that equity could be used to seed a “Public Wealth Fund” recently proposed by OpenAI. As outlined by the company, proceeds from the fund “could be distributed directly to citizens, allowing more people to participate directly in the upside of AI-driven growth, regardless of their starting wealth or access to capital.”
According to Bloomberg, when reporters on Air Force One asked Trump about the idea, he replied that he’s been talking to AI executives about “concepts where pieces could be given to the American public, where the American public essentially becomes a partner with the companies.”
Advertisement
Bloomberg also reports that CEO Sam Altman has been discussing the idea of a government stake in major AI companies since early 2025.
This seems to align with Trump’s broader interest in government ownership of for-profit companies — most notably, with the government taking a 10% stake in struggling chipmaker Intel last year.
The idea has also found some traction on the left, with Senator Bernie Sanders this week proposing a one-time, 50% tax that companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI (which is part of SpaceX) would pay in the form of stock.
With all of those businesses potentially going public this year, Sanders argued this tax would “give the public a direct role in determining the future of this technology” and “guarantee that the trillions of dollars potentially generated by A.I. are used to improve the lives of all of us.”
Elsewhere on social media, former Microsoft employee Dare Obasanjo suggested, “The groundwork is already being laid for a government bailout of OpenAI.”
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Chinese EVs face 125% US tariffs but are entering via Canada, Mexico, and partnerships with Detroit. Experts say they’ll be on US roads by 2030.
Chinese electric vehicles face 125% cumulative tariffs, a proposed Senate ban, and fierce opposition from lawmakers and the US auto industry. But there is a growing possibility that Chinese EVs will be sold in the US within the next few years. The routes in are multiplying: through Canada, Mexico, and partnerships with the very automakers that publicly oppose them.
China captured nearly 75% of global EV manufacturing and 40% of global EV trade in 2025, according to the International Energy Agency. Production of 16 million electric cars outstripped domestic demand by 20%, pushing exports to a record 2.5 million. “The only market in the world they have not yet penetrated is the United States,” said Michael Dunne, CEO of Dunne Insights.
The Big Three are in an awkward position. Ford, GM, and Stellantis have retreated from aggressive EV plans while most experts agree electrification is the future. “U.S. companies have stepped back from a lot of their electric vehicle campaigns, because they haven’t been able to develop, in an inexpensive way, a compelling value proposition,” said Stephen Dyer of AlixPartners. “You can’t be competitive if you’re not in the game.”
Advertisement
Yet all three are quietly deepening ties with Chinese automakers. Ford is in talks with Geely to create a European partnership and, according to The Wall Street Journal, “appears to be opening the door to allowing Chinese cars in the U.S. at some point.” GM imports CATL battery cells for its Chevy Bolt. Stellantis owns 21% of Leapmotor and a 51% majority of a joint venture that its CEO said could expand into Mexico and Canada.
Geely is already using Volvo’s plants rather than building new factories, giving it manufacturing bases in both Europe and the US without greenfield investment. The Volvo factory near Charleston, South Carolina, could be adapted for other Geely platforms, including Zeekr, the brand Waymo uses for its robotaxi fleet.
Chinese EVs are already arriving in Canada, where Prime Minister Mark Carney signed a deal in January permitting up to 49,000 Chinese-built EVs annually at a 6.1% tariff rate. In Mexico, Chinese vehicles account for a quarter of total sales. BYD and Geely are among finalists vying to purchase a Nissan-Mercedes plant there. GAC announced plans to begin assembly in Mexico this year.
Trump expressed support in January for letting Chinese companies manufacture in the US, provided they employ American workers. But hurdles remain. A Senate bill to permanently ban Chinese automakers has bipartisan backing. Regulations restrict Chinese-developed software in connected vehicles. And the USMCA trade deal is up for renewal, with the Trump administration pushing for a new US-content requirement in vehicles.
Advertisement
Even the border is becoming porous. Chinese EVs from BYD, Geely, and Xpeng are showing up along the US-Mexico border, purchased at Mexican dealerships for under $20,000 by citizens who commute to US border cities. Registration in the US is nearly impossible, but the demand signal is clear. According to Kelley Blue Book, 38% of Americans would consider buying a Chinese vehicle.
China’s domestic market is also pushing companies outward. EV and hybrid sales in China fell 6.8% year-over-year in April. Overall vehicle sales dropped 21.5%. Overcapacity and intensifying competition mean Chinese automakers must export to survive.
“By 2030, we will see some form of Chinese cars on American roads,” Dunne said. “One way or another, they’ll find their way in.” The question is whether Detroit will be a partner or a bystander when they do.
Electricity has split water into hydrogen and oxygen for generations in classrooms and labs. Bubbles form at two electrodes, gases rise, and the show ends there for most observers. A closer look at what actually happens during the process, combined with one key addition, changes the outcome entirely.
A pH indicator dye produces an unexpected reaction in a basic water cell containing water and a trace of sodium sulfate. The solution at the + electrode turns bright red because acid begins to form, but it is the wrong sort, whereas the solution around the electrode turns a beautiful blue as a base forms. Oxygen begins to bubble from one side, while hydrogen does the same on the other. When the two sides are blended, the colors fade, the solution returns to neutral, and the process must be repeated. The reactions do not just split water molecules in two, as one might expect; rather, they create two distinct chemical environments that generally balance each other out and sit there doing nothing.
It simply required a thin barrier to transform everything. Makers are increasingly creating their own ion-exchange membranes from components widely available at hardware stores and water-treatment companies. You can grind up the resin beads from the water softeners, mix them half and half with some PVC cement, and place the mixture on a sheet of fabric or silicone. Once dried, the sheet allows only positive or negative ions through, depending on the resin you use. The two sides of the cell are cleanly segregated, so acid stays acid and base stays base, because each compartment can just go off and do its own thing without interruption.
The separation of iron is one of the most evident examples of this. Take a load of crushed magnetite ore, a type of iron oxide that can be found everywhere, and place it on the acid side of the cell. The acid dissolves the ore and begins to transfer iron ions into the solution. The liquid then moves to the cathode compartment. Next thing you know, electricity is zapping those iron ions out of solution and depositing them as solid metal on the electrode surface, resulting in a clean layer of pure iron. At the same time, chloride ions or whatever carrier you’re using start filtering back through the membrane, regenerating fresh acid on the original side. The acid simply cycles, so you only need to add new ore. If the iron coating becomes too thick, the electrodes may need to be replaced. A tiny cell, on the other hand, may produce useable metal using just about a third of a watt and does not require an oven or high-temperature carbon reduction.
The same concept can be used to produce a far more practical energy storage system. A flow battery consists of an iron sulfate solution in water that has been stabilized with citric acid. Its main components are carbon felt electrodes, which are simply cut from normal welding blankets that have been burnt and cleaned to a nearly pure state before having their surface area blown up with microwaves. These electrodes are on either side of a single membrane. During charging, electricity is used to boost the chemistry’s energy level. When discharged, the ions penetrate the membrane and the cell generates electricity, approximately 1.2 volts and up to half an amp in a simple design using a bucket as the container. Because the active chemicals are floating in liquid tanks rather than fixed inside solid plates, the capacity simply grows with tank size, allowing you to add more solution or larger reservoirs as needed. To increase voltage, simply stack many cells, and because the liquids are in a movable solution, pumps may be employed to move them around and keep the system running longer. Crucially, the architecture allows for extension in ways that standard batteries cannot.
When you employ this simple method, hydrogen generation improves dramatically. With the membrane in place, hydrogen forms at the cathode in a sodium hydroxide solution and simply escapes via a tube via its own steam. The oxygen remains on the other side of the cell. There is no need for an additional compressor, and the gases do not mix within the cell. You can even increase the pressure to a suitable level simply by stiffening the vessel. The efficiency also improves because the reactions are no longer competing for a common place. [Source]
Photo credit: NASA / Lori Losey Lifting off from Edwards Air Force Base at 11:08 a.m. PDT on June 5, NASA test pilot Jim “Clue” Less guided the X-59 into the skies above the Mojave Desert. Eighty-one minutes later the aircraft returned to the runway after crossing the speed of sound for the first time.
At 43,400 feet, the aircraft briefly broke through the sound barrier, hitting Mach 1.077 and nearly Mach 1.1, or approximately 713 mph. An F-15 chase plane flew beside the X-59 throughout the mission, keeping an eye on things and gathering data for NASA. Unfortunately, the sonic boom it generated along the way completely drowned out any sound from the X-59, thus they were unable to get the vital acoustic profile during this inaugural flight. The flight effectively marked the conclusion of the subsonic stage and the start of some serious supersonic testing. We’d conducted 16 test flights since the X-59’s debut in October, and as a result, we’d been slowly pushing the flying envelope at lower speeds, but today’s mission verified what engineers had suspected: the X-59 handles itself fairly well once it reaches speeds sufficient to break the sound barrier.
2 AVIATION LEGENDS, 1 BUILD – Recreate the iconic Boeing 747 and NASA Space Shuttle Enterprise with the LEGO Icons Shuttle Carrier Aircraft…
DEPLOY LANDING GEAR – Turn the dial to extend the massive 18-wheel landing system on your airplane model, just like real flight operations
AUTHENTIC FEATURES & DETAILS – Remove the tail cone, engines, and landing gear from the NASA shuttle and stow them in the cargo bay during flight
Engineers designed the X-59 with a long, streamlined fuselage and a distinctive sharp nose. The goal of this design was to spread out the shock waves generated when a plane flew faster than sound. When an airplane reaches supersonic speeds, the waves begin to converge and eventually contact the ground as a big pressure spike that sounds like a loud boom. However, with the X-59, the waves are spread out over a longer length of time. So, instead of hearing a loud bang, you’ll hear a mild thud, similar to closing a car door in a calm neighborhood several houses away.
The Quesst mission’s ultimate goal is to collect flight data and community feedback to help engineers establish new noise limits. We’re talking about obsolete laws that were last modified in 1973 and state that commercial supersonic flights over land in the United States are prohibited due to sonic boom disturbances. If you can build something substantially quieter than a normal sonic boom, you might be able to get the faster passenger routes we all desire without the loud blast.
Advertisement
NASA was highly involved with this project, but they also collaborated closely with Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, which designed and produced the X-59. The aircraft incorporates an external vision system that helps the pilot maintain a clear forward view despite the towering nose that blocks a straight line of sight. Every time they fly the X-59, they collect a little more data and gain a better understanding of aerodynamics and performance. This knowledge will be used to develop innovative aircraft designs in the future. The next flight is likely to be within a few days. And that one will drive the plane to Mach 1.4 at about 55,000 feet. That is closer to what you want for potential commercial routes. As a result of a shock-sensing probe on the pursuit and ground microphones, we’ll be able to witness the X-59’s own acoustic signature.
It’s time you get up to speed with Ruby on Rails! This full-stack web framework is all about letting you build applications quickly. Its elegance, flexibility, and speed make Ruby on Rails a popular choice for businesses, so taking the time to master it can pay huge dividends down the road. In this course, you’ll follow along with the instructor as he uses Ruby on Rails to create an ozone air quality monitoring weather app. You’ll understand Ruby on Rails in just two hours and know how to use it to build awesome web apps. It’s on sale for $20.
Note: The Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackCommerce. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals helps support Techdirt. The products featured do not reflect endorsements by our editorial team.
Google has set new browser performance records for Chrome following a year of improvements, with the latest results made using an M5 MacBook Pro.
As one of the main browsers in use today, Google Chrome has engineers working to improve its performance, so it can maintain its position in the market. That work can sometimes lead to massive improvements, even for Mac users.
In a Chromium blog post on June 4, Google declares that its optimizations to Chrome have resulted in it setting records in some industry-standard benchmarks. They are said to be records across all browsers.
For the JetStream 3 benchmark, it managed a score of 469, a new record and a 10% improvement from the start of 2026. At the same time, a test of Speedmeter 3.1 resulted in another score of 61, a 5% year-over-year bump.
Advertisement
The blog post explains that the results were measured using a MacBook Pro M5 with macOS 26.0.1 installed.
Project improvements
Google outlines three areas where work was carried out to improve performance.
The first, JavaScript, adjusted an optimizing compiler to inline “fast paths,” common paths used regularly, helping the engine skip some time-consuming tasks. Inlining async operations like microtask dispatch and await resolution also had a big impact.
Work was also made to improve Google’s heuristics of what JavaScript code to optimize, as well as to implement some missing optimizations in BigInt handling.
Advertisement
For WebAssembly, Google looked into how V8 managed internal data structures. Code generation optimizations helped improve performance for AI, cryptography, and interpreter use cases.
Changes were also made to reuse temporary memory in the compiler more efficiently. There was also work to reduce the overhead of function calls from JavaScript to WebAssembly.
On the rendering engine, Blink, there were optimizations to style resolution and DOM operations using smarter caching and reducing redundant DOM lookups. A fast bailout path reducing checks was introduced for element attribute tracking, while style recalculation delays were minimized and CCSS selector caching was simplified.
Foundational page-loading and text-processing performance was addressed, including making string copying more efficient. Critical performance bottlenecks were also identified in typography and vector graphics rendering.
Advertisement
The team also completed Apple Advanced Typography shaping optimizations and fixed font fallback issues. At the same time, it eliminated heap allocations for glyph width calculations and added a cache to speed up SVG processing for graphics.
A well-timed release
Google’s decision to publish a blog post on optimizations in early June, as well as bringing up the use of the M5 MacBook Pro and Apple Advanced Typography, is quite apt. Especially considering the week ahead.
Apple’s WWDC event is set to start on June 8, with the keynote address happening on the first day. That keynote will focus on software changes coming up in Apple’s operating systems, and will almost certainly touch upon Safari improvements at some point.
As a developer-focused event, a cynic may view Google’s article as trying to spoil Apple’s party and to try to diminish Safari in advance of the keynote. However, since the article is very much a web developer-focused piece, it is doubtful that it will make any real impact in the eyes of consumers.
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella speaks onstage at Microsoft Build 2026 in San Francisco. (Photo by Dan DeLong for Microsoft)
Microsoft’s Build conference was a firehose: in-house AI models, agent-first devices, new coding tools, and a Copilot “super app” that got teased but not yet shown.
This week on the GeekWire Podcast, we’re joined by Mary Jo Foley to understand what’s ready and what’s not quite yet fully baked, from Project Solara and the Scout agentic assistant to Microsoft’s push for AI self-sufficiency and the mounting pressure on GitHub.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login