A digital photo frame shouldn’t be complicated. At its best, it’s just a good-looking screen that can be set up quickly that reliably shows the photos you care about. Unfortunately, that’s not always how things play out. The market is flooded with cheap digital frames that promise simplicity but end up delivering washed-out displays, clunky apps and a frustrating experience — leading you to abandon it after a week.
That’s a shame, because a good digital frame can be really enjoyable. Most of us have thousands of photos sitting on our phones that never make it beyond the camera roll, even though they’re exactly the kind of moments worth seeing every day. A solid frame gives those images a permanent home, whether it’s family photos cycling in the living room or shared albums updating automatically for relatives across the country. We’ve tested a range of smart photo frames to separate the genuinely useful options from the forgettable junk, and these are the ones that are actually worth putting on display.
Best digital picture frames for 2026
AURA
Using an Aura frame felt like the company looked at the existing digital photo frame market and said “we have to be able to do better than this.” And they have. The Carver Mat is extremely simple to set up, has a wonderful screen, feels well-constructed and inoffensive and has some smart features that elevate it beyond its competitors (most of which don’t actually cost that much less).
Advertisement
The Carver Mat reminds me a little bit of an Amazon Echo Show in its design. It’s a landscape-oriented device with a wide, angled base that tapers to a thin edge at the top. Because of this design, you can’t orient it in portrait mode, like some other frames I tried, but Aura has a software trick to get around that (more on that in a minute). The whole device is made of a matte plastic in either black or white that has a nice grip, doesn’t show fingerprints and just overall feels like an old-school photo frame.
The 10.1-inch display is the best I’ve seen on any digital photo frame I’ve tested. Yes, the 1,280 x 800 resolution is quite low by modern standards, but it provides enough detail that all of my photos look crisp and clear. Beyond the resolution, the Carver’s screen has great color reproduction and viewing angles, and deals well with glare from the sun and lights alike. It’s not a touchscreen, but that doesn’t bother me because it prevents the screen from getting covered in fingerprints — and the app takes care of everything you need so it’s not required.
One control you will find on the frame is a way to skip forwards or backwards through the images loaded on it. You do this by swiping left or right on the top of the frame; you can also double-tap this area to “love” an image. From what I can tell, there’s no real utility in this aside from notifying the person who uploaded that pic that someone else appreciated it. But the swipe backwards and forwards gestures are definitely handy if you want to skip a picture or scroll back and see something you missed.
Setting the frame up was extremely simple. Once plugged in, I just downloaded the Aura app, made an account and tapped “add frame.” From there, it asked if the frame was for me or if I was setting it up as a gift (this mode lets you pre-load images so the device is ready to go as soon as someone plugs it in). Adding images is as simple as selecting things from your phone’s photo library. I could see my iPhone camera roll and any albums I had created in my iCloud Photos library, including shared albums that other people contribute to. You can also connect your Google Photos account and use albums from there.
Advertisement
One of the smartest features Aura offers is a continuous scan of those albums — so if you have one of your kids or pets and regularly add new images to it, they’ll show up on your frame without you needing to do anything. Of course, this has the potential for misuse. If you have a shared album with someone and you assign it to your Aura frame, any pictures that someone else adds will get shared to your frame, something you may not actually want. Just something to keep in mind.
My only main caveat for the Carver Mat, and Aura in general, is that an internet connection is required and the only way to get photos on the device is via the cloud. There’s a limited selection of photos downloaded to the device, but the user has no control over that, and everything else is pulled in from the cloud. Aura says there are no limits on how many images you can add, so you don’t need to worry about running out of storage. But if you don’t want yet another device that needs to be online all the time, Aura might not be for you. Most other frames I tested let you directly load photos via an SD card or an app.
The Aura app also lets you manage settings on the frame like how often it switches images (anywhere from every 30 seconds to every 24 hours, with lots of granular choices in between) or what order to display photos (chronologically or shuffled). There’s also a “photo match” feature, which intelligently handles the issue of having lots of images in both portrait and landscape orientation. Since the Carver Mat is designed to be used in landscape, the photo match feature makes it so portrait pictures are displayed side-by-side, with two images filling the frame instead of having black bars on either side. It also tries to pull together complementary pairs of images, like displaying the same person or pulling together two pics that were shot around the same time.
Overall, the Carver Mat checks all the boxes. Great screen, simple but classy design, a good app, no subscription required. Yes, it’s a little more expensive than some competing options, but all the cheaper options are also noticeably worse in a number of ways. And if you don’t want a mat, there’s a standard Carver that costs $149 and otherwise has the same features and specs as the Caver Mat I tested.
Advertisement
Pros
High-quality display with minimal reflections
App makes set-up and management of your photos simple
You can store an unlimited number of pictures in Aura’s cloud
Good integration with Apple iCloud Photos and Google Photos
Elegant, well-constructed design
Smartly displays two portrait photos side-by-side on the landscape display
No subscription required
Cons
A little pricey
Aura’s app and cloud are the only way to get photos on the frame
Can’t be set up in portrait orientation
PhotoSpring
If you’re looking to spend less, PhotoSpring’s Classic Digital Frame is the best option I’ve seen that costs less than $100 (just barely at $99). The PhotoSpring model comes with a 10.1-inch touchscreen with the same 1,280 x 800 resolution as the Carver Mat. The screen is definitely not as good as the Carver, though, with worse viewing angles and a lot more glare from light sources. That said, images still look sharp and colorful, especially considering you’re not going to be continuously looking at this display.
Advertisement
PhotoSpring’s frames are basically Android tablets with some custom software to make them work as single-purpose photo devices. That means you’ll use the touchscreen to dig into settings, flip through photos and otherwise manipulate the device. Changing things like how often the frame changes images can’t be done in the app. While doing things on the frame itself are fine, I prefer Aura’s system of managing everything on the app.
However, PhotoSpring does have a good advantage here: you can pop in a microSD card or USB drive to transfer images directly to the frame, no internet connection required. You can also use the PhotoSpring app to sync albums and single images as well, which obviously requires the internet. But once those pics have been transferred, you’re good to go. Additionally, you can upload pictures on a computer via the PhotoSpring website or sync Google Photos albums.
As for the PhotoSpring hardware itself, it looks good from the front, giving off traditional photo frame vibes. The back is rather plasticky and doesn’t feel very premium, but overall it’s fine for the price. There’s an adjustable stand so you can set the frame up in portrait or landscape mode, and you can set the software to crop your photos or just display them with borders if the orientation doesn’t fit.
PhotoSpring also has a somewhat unusual offering: a frame that has a rechargeable battery. The $99 model just uses AC power, but a $139 option lets you unplug the frame and pass it around to people so they can swipe through your photos albums on the device. This feels like a niche use case, and I think most people will be better served saving their $40, but it’s something to consider.
Advertisement
One of my favorite things about PhotoSpring is that they don’t nickel-and-dime you with subscription services. There aren’t any limits on how many images you can sync, nor are things like Google Photos locked behind a paywall. The combo of a solid feature set, a fine display and a low entry price point make the PhotoSpring a good option if you want to save some cash.
Pros
Solid display
Works in portrait or landscape orientation
Lets you load pictures from multiple sources, including the PhotoSpring app, an SD card, USB drive or via Google Photos
Inoffensive design
No subscription required
Cons
Touchscreen controls mean the display is prone to picking up fingerprints
Display picks up more reflections than the Aura
Feels a little cheap
Software isn’t the most refined
Google
Advertisement
If you want a device that works great as a digital photo frame that can do a lot more than the above options, consider Google’s Nest Hub Max. It has a 10-inch touchscreen with a 1,280 x 800 resolution and can connect to a host of Google services and other apps to help you control your smart home devices. It also works great for playing videos from YouTube or other services, or streaming music thanks to its large built-in speaker. At $229, it’s significantly more expensive than our other options, but there’s no question it can do a lot more.
From a photos perspective, you’ll need to use Google Photos. If you’re not already using the app, switching your library over might be too much of a task to make it worthwhile. But if you do use Google Photos, signing in with your Google account when you set up the Hub Max makes accessing your images quite simple. You can pick specific albums, have it stream your entire library or pull things from various recommendations it offers up.
Once that’s set up, you can customize the slideshow as you’d expect — I set mine to come up by default after the Hub Max was dormant for a few minutes. I also removed everything from the display except the photos. By default, it shows you a clock and the weather forecast, but I wanted to just focus on the pictures. I do like the option to show a little more info, though.
As for the screen itself, it has the same relatively low resolution of the other digital photo frames I tried, but it handles glare very well. And the built-in ambient light sensor automatically adjusts brightness and color temperature, which I enjoy. It keeps the Hub Max from feeling like an overly bright screen blasting you with light; it recedes into the background well.
Advertisement
Of course, the Nest Hub Max has a lot of voice-activated tricks via the Google Assistant. My big question is how long the Hub Max will be supported, as Google is clearly planning to phase out the Assistant in favor of Gemini, and I’m not convinced that the Hub Max will ever support that new AI-powered tool. Beyond the Assistant, you can get a variety of apps on it like Netflix and YouTube, stream music from a bunch of apps, see video from your Nest Cam or make video calls via the built-in camera.
If you’re going to buy a Nest Hub Max, it shouldn’t be just for its digital photo frame features, even though those are quite solid. It’s best for someone well-entrenched in the Google ecosystem who wants a more multi-purpose device. If you fit the bill, though, the Nest Hub Max remains a capable device, even though it’s been around for almost five years.
Pros
Advertisement
Good display quality with auto-brightness and warmth settings
Getting images on it is a piece of cake, provided you use Google Photos
Plenty of ways to control smart home devices
Good-sounding speaker
Cons
Almost five years old
Google Assistant’s days are likely numbered
More expensive than a standard digital photo frame
AURA
The Aura Aspen frame is a step-up from our top pick in terms of overall quality and, unfortunately but predictably, price. For $229, you get a 1,600 x 1,200 resolution, 11.8-inch display that supports 169 pixels per inch, and the frame can be positioned in either portrait or landscape mode. There’s a physical button and touchbar on the frame’s edge that let’s you swipe through photos or change what’s currently displayed, but you can also do that remotely with Aura’s mobile app. All of the same great app features present in the Carver are here for the Aspen, including inviting others to contribute photos to your frame. The kicker here, like with all Aura frames, is the lack of a subscription necessary to keep your frame filled to the brim with updated photos. That alone may be worth paying the higher price tag for some when picking out a frame you want to be able to use freely for years to come. — Valentina Palladino, Deputy Editor
Pros
Advertisement
Elegant design
1,600 x 1,200 resolution display
Easy-to-use Aura app
Can invite others to add photos via mobile app
No subscription required
What to look for in digital picture frames
While a digital photo frame feels like a simple piece of tech, there are a number of things I considered when trying to find one worth displaying in my home. First and foremost was screen resolution and size. I was surprised to learn that most digital photo frames have a resolution around 1,200 x 800, which feels positively pixelated. (That’s for frames with screen sizes in the nine- to ten-inch range, which is primarily what I considered for this guide.)
But after trying a bunch of frames, I realized that screen resolution is not the most important factor; my favorite photos looked best on frames that excelled in reflectivity, brightness, viewing angles and color temperature. A lot of these digital photo frames were lacking in one or more of these factors; they often didn’t deal with reflections well or had poor viewing angles.
A lot of frames I tested felt cheap and looked ugly as well, which isn’t something you want in a smart device that sits openly in your home. That includes lousy stands, overly glossy plastic parts and design decisions I can only describe as strange, particularly for items that are meant to just blend into your home. The best digital photo frames don’t call attention to themselves and look like an actual “dumb” frame, so much so that those that aren’t so tech-savvy might mistake them for one.
Perhaps the most important thing outside of the display, though, is the software. Let me be blunt: a number of frames I tested had absolutely atrocious companion apps and software experiences that I would not wish on anyone. One that I tried did not have a touchscreen, but did have an IR remote (yes, like the one you controlled your TV with 30 years ago). Trying to use that with a Wi-Fi connection was painful, and when I tried instead to use a QR code, I was linked to a Google search for random numbers instead of an actual app or website. I gave up on that frame, the $140 PixStar, on the spot.
Other things were more forgivable. A lot of the frames out there are basically Android tablets with a bit of custom software slapped on the top, which worked fine but wasn’t terribly elegant. And having to interact with the photo frame via touch wasn’t great because you end up with fingerprints all over the display. The best frames I tried were smart about what features you could control on the frame itself vs. through an app, the latter of which is my preferred method.
Advertisement
Another important software note: many frames I tried require subscriptions for features that absolutely should be included out of the box. For example, one frame would only let me upload 10 photos at a time without a subscription. Others would let you link a Google Photos account, but you could only sync a single album without paying up. Yet another option didn’t let you create albums to organize the photos that were on the frame — it was just a giant scroll of photos with no way to give them order.
While some premium frames offer perks like unlimited photos or cloud storage, they often come at a cost. I can understand why certain things might go under a subscription, like if you’re getting a large amount of cloud storage, for example. But these subscriptions feel like ways for companies to make recurring revenue from a product made so cheaply they can’t make any money on the frame itself. I’d urge you to make sure your chosen frame doesn’t require a subscription (neither of the frames I recommend in this guide need a subscription for any of their features), especially if you plan on giving this device as a gift to loved ones.
How much should you spend on a digital picture frame
For a frame with a nine- or ten-inch display, expect to spend at least $100. Our budget recommendation is $99, and all of the options I tried that were cheaper were not nearly good enough to recommend. Spending $150 to $180 will get you a significantly nicer experience in all facets, from functionality to design to screen quality.
Digital frames FAQs
Are digital photo frames a good idea?
Yes, as long as you know what to expect. A digital picture frame makes it easy to enjoy your favorite shots without printing them. They’re especially nice for families who want to display new photos quickly. The key is understanding the limitations. Some frames have lower resolution displays or need a constant Wi-Fi connection to work properly, so they’re not a perfect replacement for a high-quality print on the wall. But if you want a simple way to keep memories on display and up to date, they’re a solid choice.
Advertisement
Can you upload photos to a digital frame from anywhere?
Most modern digital frames let you do this, but it depends on the model. Many connect to Wi-Fi and use apps, cloud storage or email uploads, so you can add photos from your phone no matter where you are. Some even let family members share directly, which is great for keeping grandparents updated with new pictures. That said, a few budget models only work with USB drives or memory cards, so check how the frame handles uploads before buying.
Devialet does nothing by accident, and the Phantom Ultimate 108 dB wireless speaker under review here is a very deliberate statement. This is the same company that gave us the Mania, the Astra and Astra Opéra de Paris integrated amplifiers, and the Dione soundbar—products where engineering, design, and attitude are inseparable. Subtlety has never been part of the brief, and Devialet isn’t pretending otherwise.
The real question is whether the Phantom Ultimate 108 dB is all presentation and bravado; a galette with no fève inside—or whether, once you strip away the gloss and the French pretense, it’s one of the most genuinely satisfying wireless speaker experiences you can buy today.
The new Phantom Ultimate lineup doubles down on what Devialet does best: extreme performance wrapped in industrial art, powered by next-generation ADH amplification that treats subtlety like an unfashionable Louis Vuitton tote from two seasons ago. Offered in the flagship 108 dB model at $3,800 (each) and the more compact 98 dB version at $1,900, these speakers are loud, ambitious, and technically obsessive by design. the full-size 108 dB flagship and the more compact 98 dB, both clearly designed to be seen as much as heard.
Finish options include Deep Forest, a dark green paired with black chrome accents, and Light Pearl, an ultra-matte off-white that leans modern rather than flashy. Devialet supplied a pair in the Deep Forest finish, and my overall impression is that they integrate easily into a wide range of rooms.
Advertisement
The darker green and black chrome accents work with both traditional and modern furniture, and they don’t clash with common flooring or carpeting choices, which makes placement less of a design headache than you might expect from something this distinctive.
Devialet Phantom Ultimate: Fifteen Years of French Obsession, Precision Engineering, and a Taste for Gold
Devialet has been headquartered in Paris since 2007, and in that time they’ve made it very clear they are not interested in blending in or asking permission. The Phantom Ultimate is the result of more than fifteen years of focused engineering, design iteration, and a very French refusal to accept “good enough.” With hundreds of patents across acoustics, electronics, signal processing, and manufacturing, Devialet isn’t chasing novelty—they’re refining a very specific idea of what modern high end audio should look and sound like.
Every curve, finish, and yes, the gold detailing, is intentional. Call it excess if you want, but this is what happens when engineers land in Paris, drink the espresso, ignore the noise, and build exactly what they want—whether the rest of the world is ready or not.
At the core of the Phantom Ultimate collection are several proprietary technologies that shape how Devialet designs and controls its wireless speakers. The focus here is precision and system management rather than novelty, with each technology serving a clearly defined role.
Advertisement
At the foundation of the Phantom Ultimate 108 dB is ADH New Gen (Analog Digital Hybrid) amplification, which pairs a Class A analog stage with Class D amplification for efficiency and control. In this latest iteration, Devialet has refined the control algorithms to extend high-frequency response up to 35 kHz while keeping thermal behavior and power delivery stable at higher listening levels. The goal here isn’t just output, but consistency when the speaker is pushed.
SAM (Speaker Active Matching) operates continuously in the background, monitoring the drivers in real time and adjusting phase and amplitude as needed. This allows the system to maintain accuracy while ensuring the drivers stay within safe operating limits, particularly during complex or high-energy passages where distortion or stress would otherwise creep in.
Low-frequency performance is handled by HBI (Heart Bass Implosion), which uses opposing woofers in a sealed enclosure to achieve bass extension down to 14 Hz. Instead of relying on a large cabinet, this approach focuses on control and symmetry, allowing the Phantom Ultimate to produce deep bass from a relatively compact enclosure without sounding loose or overblown.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
For everyday use, AVL (Adaptive Volume Level) helps smooth out level changes by automatically adjusting output based on the content being played. This keeps dialogue, music, and dynamic material balanced without constant volume adjustments, particularly when switching between different sources.
Advertisement
All of this is managed by a new intelligent processor built around the NXP i.MX 8M Nano SoC, which handles signal processing more efficiently than previous generations. Its role is largely invisible, but critical, supporting the speaker’s real-time adjustments without adding unnecessary complexity to the user experience.
Together, these elements explain why the Phantom Ultimate behaves differently from many wireless speakers, emphasizing control and consistency over showmanship.
Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108 dB: French Overkill or a Serious Wireless Speaker?
Devialet positions the Phantom Ultimate 108 dB as its most advanced Phantom yet, and on paper it’s a serious piece of work: new driver architecture, updated processing, and a feature set built around modern streaming and connectivity. The design brief is clear; high output, wide bandwidth, and tight control without turning the speaker into a complicated science project for the owner. Devialet also points to four newly registered patents tied to the Ultimate platform, which is their way of saying this isn’t just a cosmetic refresh with a new paint code.
The core hardware is a three-way layout built around a new-generation aluminum dome tweeter, a new-generation aluminum midrange dome, and two new-generation ABS-dome woofers. The bass system is engineered for low-frequency extension and control, the midrange is meant to reduce resonance so voices and instruments stay clean, and the tweeter redesign focuses on durability and refinement up top.
In practical terms, that translates to a claimed frequency response of 14 Hz to 35 kHz within plus or minus 6 dB, which is a very wide window for a single-box wireless speaker, and a maximum output rated at 108 dB SPL at 1 meter. Total amplification is listed at 1,100 watts, and Devialet is using 32-bit/96 kHz processing as the platform for all of the internal DSP and system management.
Advertisement
Connectivity is current and straightforward. The Phantom Ultimate 108 dB supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, and it runs on Devialet’s DOS 3 software platform. Streaming support includes AirPlay, Google Cast, Roon Ready, Spotify Connect (with lossless promised “coming soon”), TIDAL Connect, and UPnP.
The control center is the Devialet app, which adds practical listening presets like Music, Podcast, and Cinema modes, and handles updates so the system can evolve over time.
One important note from my time with the speakers: Qobuz Connect was not part of the deal during this review period. Based on how aggressively Devialet has been expanding protocol support, I wouldn’t be shocked if that changes, but I’m not treating it as a feature until it’s actually live.
Physically, the Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108 dB is deceptively compact-looking, but it’s not small once you measure it (or try to lift it like you’re still twenty five). The cabinet is 246 mm (9.7 in) wide, 342 mm (13.5 in) deep, and 255 mm (9.7 in) tall, and each speaker weighs 11.1 kg (24.5 lbs), and yes—this is the part where my doctor would have preferred I respected my post-surgery lifting limits. I didn’t. Moving them is a two-hands, pay-attention job, and once they’re in place you’ll understand why Devialet isn’t pretending these are “portable” in any meaningful sense.
The build quality, however, is excellent. The finish work is clean, the fit is tight, and the overall product looks like nothing else in the category—whether you find that thrilling or slightly ridiculous is between you and your interior designer.
Advertisement
Setup is refreshingly simple, because Devialet doesn’t give you a spaghetti bowl of inputs. You’ve got power, and you’ve got Ethernet to hardwire them for stability. That’s basically it. The top-mounted interface uses four touch controls, and day to day operation is mostly app-driven. If you’re the type who wants a wireless speaker that behaves like an appliance, this is closer to that than many “audiophile” lifestyle products that still manage to be fussy.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
So the Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108 dB is less about ticking spec-sheet boxes and more about how it behaves in real rooms. In the Deep Forest finish, it actually comes across as more restrained than you might expect—especially by Devialet standards. The dark green and black accents read as deliberate rather than flashy, and in lower light it can feel surprisingly understated for a product with this much output on tap.
Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108 dB is available in Light Pearl, Deep Forest, and Gold Leaf (Opéra de Paris).
It’s also worth stressing that these are sold as individual speakers, not pairs, and setup matters. Even running a single unit, I had no trouble filling multiple spaces: my living room at 20 x× 13 x 9 feet, a den at 16 x 13 x 9 feet, and even a former basement office here in New Jersey measuring 33 x 13 x 8 feet. In all three, the Phantom Ultimate delivered real scale—solid low-end weight, strong presence, and more volume than anyone would reasonably need. Your ears will give up long before the speaker does.
Advertisement
In larger, open-concept spaces, that sense of scale becomes even more obvious. Depending on the music and how hard you push it, the Phantom Ultimate can sound genuinely large and authoritative in a way most wireless speakers simply cannot manage. That ability to impose itself when asked—without falling apart or sounding strained—is still rare in this category, and it’s where the Phantom Ultimate 108 dB quietly separates itself from the pack.
Devialet Phantom Ultimate Accessories: Essentials, Options, and Real-World Proof
Devialet includes a two-year manufacturer warranty with all of its products, covering defects in materials, workmanship, and design. Coverage can be extended by an additional three years through Devialet Care for $120. The process is entirely digital; purchase the plan, receive an activation code by email, and you’re done. Clean, efficient, and very much on brand.
Devialet Phantom Ultimate Remote
For control, there’s the Phantom Ultimate Remote priced at $199. One remote can operate a single speaker or a stereo pair, and multiple remotes automatically synchronize if you’re using more than one. It’s responsive, intuitive, and a welcome alternative to reaching for the app every time you want to adjust volume or switch content.
Placement matters with the Phantom Ultimate, and Devialet treats it that way. The Treepod Stand at $349 is available in Iconic White, Deep Forest, and Light Pearl. It measures 424 × 345 × 370 mm (16.7 × 13.6 × 14.6 inches) and positions the speaker precisely 345 mm (13.6 inches) above ground level. That height is intentional, placing the speaker where Devialet believes it performs best, while the solid construction keeps everything stable.
The Tree Smart Stand, priced at $399, offers a more vertical, furniture-like presentation. Measuring 340 × 660 mm (13.4 × 26.0 inches), it’s also available in Iconic White, Deep Forest, and Light Pearl. Compared to the Treepod, it’s less about flexibility and more about committing to a specific visual and spatial statement in the room.
For wall mounting, the Gecko Wall Mount costs $299 and is designed to securely support the Phantom Ultimate 108 dB while maintaining proper acoustic orientation. It’s adjustable, relatively easy to install, and offered in Light Pearl, Deep Forest, and Opéra de Paris finishes so the speaker doesn’t look like an afterthought once it’s off the floor.
Advertisement
I’ve seen the Gecko used effectively outside of a home setting as well; specifically at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston. After spending a few days at the first Focal Powered by Naim location in the land of the trash-can beaters, I ended up in a restaurant near the terminal where a trio of Phantoms were mounted above the bar. Even with constant foot traffic, terminal noise, and a packed room, the sound was easy to follow and never got lost in the chaos.
None of these accessories are strictly required, but together they reinforce a consistent theme: with Devialet, placement is part of the product. How the Phantom Ultimate is supported, positioned, and integrated into a space isn’t an afterthought—it’s baked into the entire overall experience.
Devialet Phantom Ultimate on Treepod Stands
Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108 dB Setup: What You Need to Know Before You Hit Play
Yes, the Devialet app is required to set up the Phantom Ultimate during first use. There’s no workaround here. Without completing the initial configuration in the app, the speaker won’t operate—not even over Bluetooth. Think of the app as the ignition key; once setup is complete, day-to-day use is simple, but you can’t skip that first step.
If you’re wondering about stereo pairing, the answer is equally straightforward: you can only pair two speakers of the same model. A Phantom Ultimate 108 dB must be paired with another 108 dB unit, and the same rule applies to the 98 dB version. You can’t mix Phantom I and Phantom Ultimate models in a stereo configuration.
Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
As for placement, Devialet’s recommendations are sensible and worth following, especially given how much output these speakers are capable of. Position the Phantom Ultimate between 45 and 90 cm (18 to 35 inches) off the ground to balance impact and clarity. Leave at least 30 cm (12 inches) between the rear of the speaker and the wall to allow low frequencies to develop properly, and keep the area in front of the speaker clear so sound isn’t obstructed.
Listening distance matters, too. Devialet suggests placing the speaker 1.5 to 2.5 meters (5 to 8.2 feet) from your seating position. In a stereo setup, space the speakers 1.5 to 2.5 meters apart and toe them in 25 to 30 degrees toward the listening position. Done right, this creates a stable, focused soundstage without forcing the speakers to work harder than they need to.
In my own setup, I took a more hardwired approach. I ran CAT6 directly from a new Verizon Fios fibre optic modem, which sits directly below the main floor. From there, I’ve terminated connections in seven rooms throughout the house, each either connected directly to the modem or through an ASUS Mesh WiFi 7 router. In every location I tested, the Phantom Ultimate speakers were seeing at least 700 Mbps of available bandwidth, regardless of where they were placed. Connectivity was never a limiting factor.
Advertisement
Placement experiments went beyond the official recommendations as well. In one configuration, I set the speakers on our dining room credenza using IsoAcoustics isolation platforms, which raised the center of the driver to approximately 45 inches off the floor. In other setups, the speakers were spaced 6 to 7 feet apart and positioned 2 to 3 feet from the rear wall.
Setup with the Devialet app was relatively easy and mostly uneventful, which is a good thing. The speaker was discovered quickly on the network, and the step-by-step process was clear enough that there was little guesswork involved. Since the app is required for initial setup and the speaker won’t function without it, it’s reassuring that the process doesn’t feel complicated or fragile.
The app version in use during my time with the Phantom Ultimate was 1.25.x, which added full support for the Ultimate platform. That update introduced additional audio settings for the Phantom Ultimate models, including three listening modes, a six-band equalizer, and other advanced controls, along with a revised layout and a smoother setup and stereo-pairing process.
Network discovery was consistent, and firmware updates completed without issues. The expanded Network Status section, which shows Wi-Fi strength and connection quality, was useful for confirming that everything was operating as expected.
Advertisement
Streaming support is handled through integrated protocols rather than forcing you into a closed ecosystem. Bluetooth, AirPlay 2, Spotify Connect, Roon Ready, and UPnP were all available, and switching between services was straightforward. Volume control is precise, whether adjusting a single speaker or managing playback across rooms.
I also tested multi-room playback with one speaker in each room. Synchronization was generally solid, with only a slight delay when starting playback across rooms—small enough that you’d likely miss it unless you were listening for it. Once playing, everything stayed aligned, and the app allows different volume levels in each room, which makes the feature genuinely usable rather than decorative.
Devialet Phantom Ultimate 108 dB Green Pair on Tree Stands
Listening Impressions: Attitude Française, Sans le Ridicule
The urge to see what kind of structural damage these could inflict was definitely there right out of the box, but I held back. From past experience with Devialet speakers, I already knew the low-end story—deep bass, serious impact, and plenty of definition were a given. My longer-term takeaway from earlier models, though, was that all that sub-bass and mid-bass muscle sometimes came at the expense of midrange presence. Call it a polite “V” if you want.
Before getting more critical, I let the speakers run for a few hours a day over several days, looping music from an older iPhone 14. Whether burn-in is real is always up for debate, but at the very least, no drivers were harmed in the process—and if there’s any downside to repeated sessions of Shostakovich followed by deadmau5, I haven’t found it yet.
Advertisement
The Phantom Ultimate feels different, and in a way that mattered to me. There’s still weight and authority down low, but it no longer feels like the midrange is being asked to take a step back. That shift shows up quickly with something like Nick Cave’s “Avalanche.” His voice is there, front and center, but it’s the piano and string textures that really benefit—notes have body, tone, and decay, which are essential to how that track works. On better speakers, those elements carry as much emotional weight as the vocal, and here they finally do.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Domestic realities (it’s been a long two years) meant I didn’t push the Phantom Ultimate 108 dB to the kind of levels that would have felt a little irresponsible, but I did get it loud enough to understand what it’s capable of. Even without going full send, there was plenty of mid-bass and lower midrange energy, and that weight carried well beyond the main listening position.
Moving around the room, the soundstage did lose some specificity, but there was no hollowing out of the sound or collapse in scale. The overall presentation stayed intact, with weight and presence remaining consistent even when listening well off-axis.
Advertisement
That translated across all three rooms I used for testing, where the presence was obvious without needing to sit in a carefully defined sweet spot. At one point, I did catch myself wondering whether this was simply too much speaker for the space. That thought disappeared the moment I pulled the volume back to just above conversation level. Everything snapped into focus—timing felt right, dynamics were intact, and the speaker didn’t lose its grip. It’s a reminder that control matters more than brute force, even when a speaker clearly has plenty of it in reserve.
Switching over to Peter Gabriel—“Been Undone” (Dark-Side Mix), “In Your Eyes,”“i/o” (Bright Side Mix), “Games Without Frontiers,” and “Biko”—it became clear that the Phantom Ultimate is very much tuned for listeners who gravitate toward electronic music, synth-driven rock, and rhythm-forward material. The presentation is propulsive and clean, with a lot of detail on tap; some might call it borderline “hi-fi”—and it delivers real slam without smearing bass lines or slowing things down. There’s texture and speed here, and the speaker has no trouble keeping complex mixes organized at higher levels.
Vocals on some of these tracks leaned slightly toward a polished, studio-lit presentation rather than a softer, more natural one, but the trade-off is scale. The Phantom Ultimate sounds big in a way that would make most of the passive speakers I own feel small, especially when it comes to low-end reach and overall presence.
“Biko,” “So Much,” and “In Your Eyes” hit differently for me, and that had less to do with the speaker than the music itself. Those tracks carry their own weight; memories of not being at your best with someone, and the kind of longing that puts you back under a blanket on a beach in Cape Town. We own our successes and our failures. Gabriel just has a way of making both feel uncomfortably close.
Advertisement
deadmau5, Boards of Canada, Talking Heads, and Tangerine Dream were a very different experience through these speakers. The sense of scale, presence, speed, and spaciousness brought out aspects of their music that few other speakers I’ve used over the years have managed to capture as convincingly. Rhythms had drive, layers stayed separated, and the overall presentation felt expansive without losing control.
If I had a larger home office and a dog who wouldn’t spend the entire day staring suspiciously at them—these would be very high on my list.
Listening to McCoy Tyner, Donald Byrd, Coltrane, Wes Montgomery, Miles Davis, Grant Green, and Lee Morgan highlighted both the strengths and the limits of these speakers. Rhythm, snap, and tonal weight are clear positives. The Phantom Ultimate locks into timing well, and it gives piano, bass, and drums real propulsion without sounding slow or bloated.
Texture was there, but it sometimes felt a little constructed—more grey than warm. Compared to my Wharfedale, Q Acoustics, or Triangle speakers, there was less richness in the upper bass and lower midrange. The Devialet brings power, thrust, and precision, but it doesn’t lean into the kind of imperfect coloration that, for me, makes jazz feel more human and less polished.
Advertisement
Horns, to their credit, weren’t bright or edgy, but you can clearly hear the character of an aluminum dome tweeter versus a soft dome. One rolls off sooner and trades sparkle for ease; the other delivers more energy and extension up top. Neither approach is wrong, but which one is more pleasing comes down to taste—and with acoustic jazz, my preference still leans toward warmth over sparkle.
The Bottom Line
The Phantom Ultimate 108 dB is a reminder of what happens when a wireless speaker is engineered like a serious loudspeaker rather than a lifestyle accessory. The technology matters here—ADH New Gen amplification, aggressive DSP control, serious processing power, and drivers that are designed to move air with authority. What it does best is scale, speed, and clarity. Few wireless speakers I’ve heard can project this kind of weight and presence into a room without falling apart, and even fewer maintain control when pushed. As a pair, the Phantom Ultimate delivers a level of output and composure that most wireless systems simply can’t approach.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
That said, it’s not perfect. While bass control, dynamics, and timing are excellent, the tonal balance leans toward precision over warmth. Acoustic textures, particularly in jazz—can sound a bit polished compared to the richer, more forgiving voicing of my Wharfedale, Q Acoustics, or Triangle speakers. And while the aluminum dome tweeter brings energy and extension, some listeners may prefer the softer roll-off and natural ease of a traditional soft dome design.
Advertisement
This is a speaker for listeners who want maximum performance with minimal boxes, who value modern streaming, industrial design, and the ability to fill large or open spaces without resorting to separates, subwoofers, or complicated setups. At $3,800 per speaker, it’s unquestionably expensive, and it should be—this isn’t competing with mainstream wireless speakers on price. It’s competing on capability.
Even so, there’s no way around the conclusion: the Phantom Ultimate 108 dB earns an Editors’ Choice Award. In terms of sheer scale, power, speed, and clarity from a wireless speaker system, it’s the most convincing I’ve heard. Everything else I have at home from KEF, Triangle, Audioengine, and Q Acoustics sounds slightly broken by comparison—also far more affordable, and very much playing in a different league.
Have you ever been watching a movie or tv show and found it doesn’t look right? Almost like the movement of the picture looks too smooth? Well, that’s commonly called called the ‘soap opera effect’.
Why is it called the soap opera effect? It stems from the fact that soap operas were shot at higher frame rates compared to movies particularly (but also some TV shows), giving them a kind of ‘hyperreal’ smoothness to the movement.
So why is this a problem on movies on modern TVs? It’s because even the best TVs tend to come with some hidden settings active by default, called ‘motion smoothing’ or ‘motion interpolation’. On some TVs, such as Samsung, they are also now referred to as ‘clarity settings.’
Advertisement
If you’ve been fed up with this weird looking motion on your TV but don’t know how to solve it, we’re here to help. But first a quick explanation as to what’s going on.
Why does the soap opera effect happen?
Having motion settings on can cause the soap opera effect, particularly with movies (Image credit: Future)
Modern TVs are very bright and work at a range of different frame rates (how often the image on-screen changes) and this can cause a problem called ‘judder’ in movies (which are shot at 24 frames per second), where you can really see gaps in the movement sometimes, which you can’t see in the dim, custom-designed world of movie theaters.
Advertisement
On top of that, many cheaper or older TV literally can’t show a clean 24fps image. Many of these TVs have screens that refresh at 60fps, and can only cleanly show motion at a number that 60 divides into (such as 30fps, which is common in HDR video). This means you’ll get more judder, because 24fps movies are having frame moved forward or backward in timing to fit the world 60fps TVs.
(More advanced TVs are 120fps, and these actually can show a clean 24fps image, because 120 divides by 24).
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
On top of that, lower-quality streaming or digital broadcasts lose a lot of information in fast-moving scenes, because the amount of data they can include is pretty limited. Anytime there is a quick, panning shot or fast moving sequence, there will be a loss of detail on the screen.
Advertisement
This is where motion smoothing settings come into play. TV manufacturers began to add motion settings into their lower frame rate TVs to help reduce motion blur and judder during fast paced content, but it’s used in all TVs.
With motion smoothing activated, a TV will artificially insert new frames within content to improve clarity. The TV essentially guesses what the next frame is going to look like based on the previous few frames, and adds new frames in – in order to make the image appear smoother and more detailed.
This may sound great for sports, and it usually is – but it has a weird effect on 24fps movies, or cinematic TVs shows. When a TV tries to artificially add more frames into a movie, the movie starts to look too smooth, almost like it’s moving too fast – because the low frame rate of movies is very distinctive.
Advertisement
A long panning shot will suddenly look like it’s moving at a higher speed, taking on a soap opera appearance, hence the name ‘soap opera effect’. People will feel like they’ve move too twitchily. Things will also appear artificially ‘clear’ in a way that’s really off for how we’re used to films.
Thankfully, in most cases, these motion settings can be controlled or turned off. Here’s how – but bear in mind, you won’t always want to turn them off.
Turning off or adjusting motion smoothing
If you head to your TV’s picture settings, often under ‘more’ or ‘advanced’ settings, motion settings can often have their own sub-category. Sometimes, they can be found under another menu and can be referred to as ‘clarity’ settings.
Advertisement
Below I’ve done a quick step-by-step guide on how you would access motion settings to turn them off or adjust using our reference LG C5 – there’s no way I can run through it for every TV, but it will hopefully give you a useful example.
1. Access Picture settings
1. First, you’ll need to access the picture settings. For the C5, I clicked Settings (the cog button on the remote) and then clicked Picture Settings.
2. Access the advanced settings menu
To get to the right area where motion settings will be located, I selected Advanced Picture Settings.
3. Go to the menu where Picture Settings will be
After clicking Advanced Picture Settings, I then scrolled down to Claritysettings. While the area motion settings will be will vary from TV to TV, they’ll most likely be under a ‘clarity’ type sub-menu.
Advertisement
4. Scroll to the motion settings menu
Once you find the correct menu, in the C5’s case Clarity, scroll down to the relevant motion settings menu. With the C5, this was called TruMotion
5. Turn off or adjust motion settings
Once you’ve found the motion settings menu, you can select your preferred motion style or turn them off. This should get rid of the soap opera effect.
An indicator of motion settings will be two headings called ‘blur reduction’ and ‘judder reduction’, or can be referred to under different names. I found, for example, that while testing Philips OLEDs, judder is referred to as ‘smoothness’.
An example of judder and blur settings on the C5. This will often be the default on other TVs, rather than specific named motion styles. (Image credit: Future)
Another quick fix, if you’re looking for film-accurate picture, is to set your TV to Filmmaker Mode picture mode. Not all TVs have one, but most do nowadays. This picture mode is designed to turn off any enhancement features, including motion smoothing (though some brands have started to keep some more minimal motion settings on).
Advertisement
Where motion smoothing can help
The TCL C7K (pictured) was one of the op budget TVs I tested last year, but it needs some help with motion (Image credit: Future)
While home theater purists often say motion smoothing is no good, as someone who’s tested a lot of TVs of every kind, there are many situations where it can be helpful.
We loved TCL’s mini-LED range in 2025, with the TCL QM7K (the TCL C7K is the UK equivalent) being a particular highlight. While this TV is great, its motion handling is less so, despite it being a 120Hz TV.
When I tested the C7K, I found that without motion settings tweaked, there was a lot of judder while watching sports. However, setting blur and judder reduction to 3 (out of 10) resulted in a smoother image that didn’t result in the soap opera effect.
Advertisement
I’ve found this to be the case with a lot of budget TVs, especially 60Hz panel ones for the reason mentioned above – 24fps movies literally can’t show correctly on these screens, so a minimal amount of motion smoothing is the best option.
In fact, I found that LG’s OLEDs, including one of my top sets of 2025 the LG C5, benefitted from keep a motion setting on. In its motion settings menu, activating Cinematic Movement, a mild form of motion smoothing designed purely to preserve the look of 24fps movies, resulted in a much more stable image. A panning shot of a rocky cliffside in No Time To Die had a lot less judder with this setting activated – more like how it’s supposed to look.
Really, motion smoothing is all about personal preference. It will require some time experimenting, but it’s worth the investment. It will depend on what TV you have and what content you’re watching as well, but if you’re looking to get away from the soap opera effect, this is how to do it.
And of course, you can also follow TechRadar on YouTube and TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
Sarah Elaine Eaton, Beatriz Antonieta Moya Figueroa and Robert Brennan of The University of Calgary and Rahul Kumar of Brock University explore how GenAI is changing how young people learn.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is now a reality in higher education, with students and professors integrating chatbots into teaching, learning and assessment. But this isn’t just a technical shift; it’s reshaping how students and educators learn and evaluate knowledge.
Our recent qualitative study with 28 educators across Canadian universities and colleges – from librarians to engineering professors – suggests that we have entered a watershed moment in education.
We must grapple with the question: What exactly should be assessed when human cognition can be augmented or simulated by an algorithm?
On one hand, AI tools like online translators and text generators have become so advanced that they can write just like humans. This makes it difficult for teachers to detect cheating. Additionally, these tools can sometimes present fake news as facts or repeat unfair social biases, such as racism and sexism, found in the data used to train them.
On the other hand, the studies we reviewed showed AI can be a legitimate assistant that can make learning more inclusive. For instance, AI can provide support for students with disabilities or help those who are learning an additional language.
Because it’s nearly impossible to block every AI tool, schools should not just focus on catching cheaters. Instead, schools and post-secondary institutions can update their policies and provide better training for both students and teachers. This helps everyone learn how to use technology responsibly while maintaining a high standard of academic integrity.
Advertisement
Participants in our study positioned themselves not as enforcers, but as stewards of learning with integrity.
Their focus was on distinguishing between assistance that supports learning and assistance that substitutes for it. They identified three skill areas where assessment boundaries currently fall: prompting, critical thinking and writing.
Prompting: A legitimate and assessable skill
Participants widely viewed prompting – the ability to formulate clear and purposeful instructions for a chatbot – as a skill they could assess. Effective prompting requires students to break down tasks, understand concepts and communicate precisely.
Several noted that unclear prompts often produce poor outputs, forcing students to reflect on what they are really asking.
Advertisement
Prompting was considered ethical only when used transparently, drawing on one’s own foundational knowledge. Without these conditions, educators feared prompting may drift into over-reliance or uncritical use of AI.
Critical thinking
Educators saw strong potential for AI to support assessing critical thinking. Because chatbots can generate text that sounds plausible but may contain errors, omissions or fabrications, students must evaluate accuracy, coherence and credibility. Participants reported using AI-generated summaries or arguments as prompts for critique, asking students to identify weaknesses or misleading claims.
These activities align with a broader need to prepare students for work in a future where assessing algorithmic information will be a routine task. Several educators argued it would be unethical not to teach students how to interrogate AI-generated content.
Writing: Where boundaries tighten
Writing was the most contested domain. Educators distinguished sharply between brainstorming, editing and composition.
Advertisement
Brainstorming with AI was acceptable when used as a starting point, as long as students expressed their own ideas and did not substitute AI suggestions for their own thinking.
Editing with AI (for example, grammar correction) was considered acceptable only after students had produced original text and could evaluate whether AI-generated revisions were appropriate. Although some see AI as a legitimate support for linguistic diversity, as well as helping to level the field for those with disabilities or those who speak English as an additional language, others fear a future of language standardisation where the unique, authentic voice of the student is smoothed over by an algorithm.
Having chatbots draft arguments or prose was implicitly rejected. Participants treated the generative phase of writing as a uniquely human cognitive process that needs to be done by students, not machines.
Educators also cautioned that heavy reliance on AI could tempt students to bypass the “productive struggle” inherent in writing, a struggle that is central to developing original thought.
Advertisement
Our research participants recognised that in a hybrid cognitive future, skills related to AI, together with critical thinking are essential skills for students to be ready for the workforce after graduation.
Living in the post-plagiarism era
The idea of co-writing with GenAI brings us into a post-plagiarism era where AI is integrated into teaching, learning and communication in a way that challenges us to reconsider our assumptions about authorship and originality.
This does not mean that educators no longer care about plagiarism or academic integrity. Honesty will always be important. Rather, in a post-plagiarism context, we consider that humans and AI co-writing and co-creating does not automatically equate to plagiarism.
Today, AI is disrupting education and although we don’t yet have all the answers, it’s certain that AI is here to stay. Teaching students to co-create with AI is part of learning in a post-plagiarism world.
Advertisement
Design for a socially just future
Valid assessment in the age of AI requires clearly delineating which cognitive processes must remain human and which can be legitimately cognitively offloaded. To ensure higher education remains a space for ethical decision-making especially in terms of teaching, learning and assessment, we propose five design principles, based on our research:
Explicit expectations
The educator is responsible for making clear if and how GenAI can be used in a particular assignment. Students must know exactly when and how AI is a partner in their work. Ambiguity can lead to unintentional misconduct, as well as a breakdown in the student-educator relationship.
Process over product
By evaluating drafts, annotations and reflections, educators can assess the learning process, rather than just the output, or the product.
Design assessment tasks that require human judgement
Tasks requiring high-level evaluation, synthesis and critique of localised contexts are areas where human agency is still important.
Educators must teach students to be critical consumers of GenAI, capable of identifying its limitations and biases.
Preserving student voice
Assessments should foreground how students know what they know, rather than what they know.
Preparing students for a hybrid cognitive future
Educators in this study sought ethical, practical ways to integrate GenAI into assessment. They argued that students must understand both the capabilities and the limitations of GenAI, particularly its tendency to generate errors, oversimplifications or misleading summaries.
In this sense, post-plagiarism is not about crisis, but about rethinking what it means to learn and demonstrate knowledge in a world where human cognition routinely interacts with digital systems.
Advertisement
Universities and colleges now face a choice. They can treat AI as a threat to be managed, or they can treat it as a catalyst for strengthening assessment, integrity and learning. The educators in our study favour the latter.
Sarah Elaine Eaton is a professor and research chair for the Werklund School of Education, in the University of Calgary. Beatriz Antonieta Moya Figueroa is an assistant professor for the Werklund School of Education in the University of Calgary. Robert Brennan is a professor of mechanical and manufacturing engineering at the University of Calgary. Rahul Kumar is an assistant professor for the Faculty of Education at Brock University.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
European security officials believe two Russian space vehicles have intercepted the communications of at least a dozen key satellites over the continent. From a report: Officials believe that the likely interceptions, which have not previously been reported, risk not only compromising sensitive information transmitted by the satellites but could also allow Moscow to manipulate their trajectories or even crash them.
Russian space vehicles have shadowed European satellites more intensively over the past three years, at a time of high tension between the Kremlin and the West following Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. For several years, military and civilian space authorities in the West have been tracking the activities of Luch-1 and Luch-2 — two Russian objects that have carried out repeated suspicious maneuvers in orbit.
Both vehicles have made risky close approaches to some of Europe’s most important geostationary satellites, which operate high above the Earth and service the continent, including the UK, as well as large parts of Africa and the Middle East. According to orbital data and ground-based telescopic observations, they have lingered nearby for weeks at a time, particularly over the past three years. Since its launch in 2023, Luch-2 has approached 17 European satellites.
Multiple critical vulnerabilities in the popular n8n open-source workflow automation platform allow escaping the confines of the environment and taking complete control of the host server.
Collectively tracked as CVE-2026-25049, the issues can be exploited by any authenticated user who can create or edit workflows on the platform to perform unrestricted remote code execution on the n8n server.
Researchers at several cybersecurity companies reported the problems, which stem from n8n’s sanitization mechanism and bypass the patch for CVE-2025-68613, another critical flaw addressed on December 20.
According to Pillar Security, exploiting CVE-2026-25049 enables complete compromise of the n8n instance and could be leveraged to run arbitrary system commands on the server, steal all stored credentials, secrets (API keys, OAuth tokens), and sensitive configuration files.
By exploiting the vulnerability, the researchers were also able to access the filesystem and internal systems, pivot to connected cloud accounts, and hijack AI workflows (intercept prompts, modify responses, redirect traffic).
Advertisement
As n8n is a multi-tenant environment, accessing internal cluster services can potentially allow pivoting to other tenants’ data.
“The attack requires nothing special. If you can create a workflow, you can own the server,” Pillar Security says in a report today.
Full attack chain Source: Pillar Security
Pillar’s report describes the problem as incomplete AST-based sandboxing and explains that it arises from n8n’s weak sandboxing of user-written server-side JavaScript expressions in workflows.
On December 21, 2025, they demonstrated a chained bypass to the n8n team, allowing sandbox escape and access to the Node.js global object, leading to RCE.
A fix was implemented two days later, but upon further analysis, Pillar found it incomplete, and a second escape via a different mechanism using equivalent operations remained possible.
Advertisement
n8n developers confirmed the bypass on December 30, and eventually, n8n released version 2.4.0 on January 12, 2026, addressing the issue.
Researchers at Endor Labs also discovered sanitization bypasses and demonstrated the CVE-2026-25049 vulnerability with a simple proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit that achieves remote code execution.
“In all versions prior to 2.5.2 and 1.123.17, the sanitization function assumes keys in property accesses are strings in attacker-controlled code,” says Cristian Staicu of Endor Labs.
Advertisement
However, while the check is reflected in TypeScript typings, it is not enforced at runtime, introducing a type-confusion vulnerability. This leads to bypassing the “sanitization controls entirely, enabling arbitrary code execution attacks.”
In a report today, researchers at SecureLayer7 provide the technical details that enabled them to achieve “server side JavaScript execution using the Function constructor.”
They discovered CVE-2026-25049 while analyzing CVE-2025-68613 and n8n’s fix for it. It took more than 150 failed attempts to refine a successful bypass.
SecureLayer7’s report also includes a PoC exploit and detailed steps for the initial setup and creating a malicious workflow that leads to full server control.
Advertisement
Recommended steps
n8n users should update the platform to the most recent version (currently 1.123.17 and 2.5.2). Pillar security also recommends rotating the ‘N8N_ENCRYPTION_KEY’ and all credentials stored on the server, and reviewing workflows for suspicious expressions.
If updating is not possible at the moment, the n8n team provides administrators with a workaround, which acts as a temporary mitigation and does not completely address the risk:
Limit workflow creation and editing permissions to fully trusted users only
Deploy n8n in a hardened environment with restricted operating system privileges and network access to reduce the impact of potential exploitation
Currently, there have not been any public reports about CVE-2026-25049 being exploited. However, n8n’s growing popularity appears to have caught the attention of cybercriminals in the context of the Ni8mare flaw (CVE-2026-21858).
GreyNoise this week reported seeing potentially malicious activity targeting exposed n8n endpoints vulnerable to Ni8mare, logging at least 33,000 requests between January 27 and February 3.
Although this probing could be due to research activity, scanning for the /proc filesystem indicates interest in post-exploitation potential.
Advertisement
Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.
In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.
Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, any opinions expressed below belong solely to the author. Data sourced from the Labour Force in Singapore 2025 report by Singapore Ministry of Manpower released on 29 Jan 2026.
According to the latest data released by the Ministry of Manpower, the path to prosperity in Singapore still leads through university. While success stories of college dropouts who became billionaires capture imagination, the truth is that for most people the safe and tested path of organised education is still the one that pays best.
As the national median salary for all resident Singaporean employees climbed to S$5,775 in 2025, university degree holders saw their median salary rise to S$9,038, up from S$8,656 last year.
In fact, university degree holders outearn the next group – those with diplomas and other professional qualifications – by a whopping 78 per cent.
Advertisement
Source: Labour Force in Singapore 2025, Singapore Ministry of Manpower
$100,000 in your 30s
It’s also quite impressive how quick the income progression is for university graduates. Starting at just S$4,680 in gross income upon graduation, they double it by mid to late 30s, pushing the median for everybody above S$100,000 annually.
Source: Labour Force in Singapore 2025, Singapore Ministry of Manpower
Incomes peak and remain relatively comparable in your 40s and 50s, before declining on average towards your retirement (but still remaining at over six figures annually for more than a half of degree holders).
A tale of two Singapores
With recently reported increases in median pay of around $400 per month per year, university graduates in Singapore are on track to be the first group to cross the S$10,000 mark by about 2030.
By then they might be outearning diploma holders by $4,000 (and other groups by even more). They would also constitute about half of the local labour force (currently at around 45 per cent).
Given the huge disparities it does suggest a growing, fundamental split in the Singaporean society—two different groups leading completely different lives, increasingly disconnected from each other, which could contribute to greater sociopolitical divisions as well.
It’s no longer about a narrow elite that many aspire to joining but few do, but one half of the society regularly making twice as much money than the other.
Advertisement
On the one hand, it’s only natural for those best educated and most capable to considerably outearn the rest. On the other, however, it may put a strain on the expectations Singaporeans on both sides of the divide have of their country.
The government itself has just acknowledged that it might be a challenge to provide equally good jobs for everybody in the future.
The only thing you can do is to stay the course on education and climb the ladder to, hopefully, join the prosperous side.
Alexa+ is now available to everyone in the US, and if you are an Amazon Prime member, you get it at no extra cost. Amazon has been testing Alexa+ through an early access program over the past year. Now, it is moving out of that phase and opening the experience to a much wider audience across Echo devices, the Alexa mobile app, and Alexa.com.
What is Alexa+?
Amazon
Alexa+ is a rebuilt version of Amazon’s assistant, powered by large language models from Amazon Nova and Anthropic. Unlike the older Alexa, which focused on short commands, Alexa+ is designed to understand natural, conversational requests and handle more complex tasks.
You don’t even need an Echo speaker to use it. Alexa+ works on the web and inside the Alexa app, making it more like a full AI assistant than a smart speaker feature.
Amazon says people are already using Alexa+ roughly twice as much as the standard version during testing. The assistant can answer deeper questions, help with planning, and handle longer back-and-forth conversations instead of one-off commands.
How much does Alexa+ cost?
Pricing is where Alexa+ becomes especially interesting. Prime members in the US get unlimited access to Alexa+ as part of their existing subscription. If you are not a Prime member, Amazon offers a limited free chat experience through the Alexa app and Alexa.com.
Advertisement
Full access without Prime costs $19.99 per month, which Amazon is clearly positioning as an incentive to subscribe to Prime instead.
What Alexa+ can do for you
Amazon
Alexa+ goes well beyond setting timers and playing music. It can help plan meals, order groceries, manage calendars, write emails, help with shopping, organize trips, and build smart home routines using natural voice commands. You can also use Alexa+ as a text-based chatbot for research, planning, and content generation through the web and mobile app.
By bundling Alexa+ directly with Prime subscription, something that millions of users already pay for, Amazon is turning Alexa+ into something people are likely to try simply because it is already there.
After three rounds of developer betas, the introduction of RC builds of iOS 26.3, iPadOS 26.3, watchOS 26.3, tvOS 26.3, visionOS 26.3, and macOS Tahoe 26.3 means a public release is happening soon.
Apple’s hardware that works with the 26-generation operating systems – Image Credit: Apple
The introduction of a GM (Gold or Golden Master) or an RC (Release Candidate) build means that it is practically ready for release to the general public. Barring any last-minute corrections or bug fixes, it should effectively have the same content as that final public release version. We hope that Apple has fixed the outstanding bugs that we’ve reported so far. This has been a short beta cycle. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
Last year, it was revealed that Google is working on a new range of Android PCs powered by a new operating system called Aluminium OS, and a while back, we also learned that these PCs might ship with a barebones version of the Pixel Camera app. However, the actual PC itself might take a bit longer to arrive. As reported by The Verge, a detailed report around Google’s internal Project Aluminium suggests the Android-based PC operating system isn’t close to launch.
Digital Trends
While Google has talked about combining Android and ChromeOS into a more unified platform, court filings and internal timelines indicate a full public release may not happen until 2028, with limited testing possibly starting earlier. The delay isn’t just technical. It’s also strategic. Google still has to figure out how an Android PC OS fits alongside ChromeOS, which already powers millions of Chromebooks, especially in schools and enterprise environments. And ChromeOS isn’t disappearing anytime soon.
Why Aluminium may take years to land
According to testimony and internal documents cited in the reporting, Google plans to maintain ChromeOS support for up to 10 years on existing devices, potentially stretching into the early 2030s. That means two platforms could coexist for a long time. Some older Chromebooks may not even be able to upgrade to Aluminium due to hardware limits, forcing Google to support parallel systems longer than planned.
Unsplash
That overlap creates messy questions. Should partners ship ChromeOS or Android-for-PC? Will apps work the same across both? And how do developers prioritize one platform without fragmenting the ecosystem? Even basic expectations like keyboard, mouse, and multi-window workflows require bigger changes than Android’s current tablet mode can offer. Further, legal and business complications add another wrinkle. The documents show Google’s laptop OS strategy intersects with ongoing antitrust scrutiny and Play Store rules, which could affect how tightly Google bundles its apps and services on Aluminium devices.
US v. Google (2020) / Mickens demonstrative
In other words, even if the software is ready, how it’s packaged and distributed may be controversial. For buyers, the takeaway is simple: Android laptops aren’t around the corner. ChromeOS will remain Google’s main PC platform for years, and Aluminium looks more like a long-term evolution than an imminent replacement. When it does arrive, expect a transition period, not an overnight shift. If you’re considering a Chromebook or waiting for an Android-native PC, it’s worth keeping expectations grounded.
Andreessen Horowitz just raised a whopping new $15 billion in funding. And a $1.7 billion chunk of that is going to its infrastructure team, the one responsible for some of its biggest, most prominent AI investments including Black Forrest Labs, Cursor, OpenAI, ElevenLabs, Ideogram, Fal and dozens of others.
A16z general partner with the infra team Jennifer Li (who oversees such investments as ElevenLabs – just valued at $11 billion); Ideagram and Fal, has a clear thesis on where the team is looking to spend it’s latest chunk of cash.
Watch as Venture and Startups editor Julie Bort talks with Li on Equity about where a16z sees this AI super cycle going next, including the talent crunch hitting AI-native startups, why search infrastructure matters more than people think, and what kinds of companies are actually getting funded right now.