Connect with us

Tech

The NFL Won A Lawsuit Over Its Bluesky Ban. Its Social Media Strategy Is Still A Loser

Published

on

from the a-social-media-fumble dept

Full disclosure up front: I sit on the board of Bluesky. That said, I had absolutely no idea this lawsuit existed until recently. Which, honestly, tells you something about how much of a legal non-event it was. But the underlying story here—about the NFL treating social media the way it treats television broadcast rights—is worth digging into, because it reveals something deeply broken about how major sports leagues think about the internet.

The 2025-2026 NFL season just wrapped up, and along with it came a federal court ruling in a case called Brown v. NFL that most people missed entirely. Two football fans—one in Illinois, one in California—sued the NFL under the Sherman Act, claiming the league violated antitrust law by barring its teams from posting on Bluesky. The fans wanted to follow their teams—the Bears and the now-champion Seahawks—on the platform they actually use, rather than on Elon Musk’s X. The court dismissed the case for lack of standing, and honestly, that was probably the right legal outcome.

The fans couldn’t demonstrate a concrete injury—the information they wanted was still available, for free, on X. As the court put it, their grievance reduced to being “denied the ability to obtain real-time NFL team information on a private platform with which they are ideologically comfortable.” And “I don’t like Elon Musk” is not an antitrust injury. The Sherman Act targets conspiracies that restrain trade and harm competition—not content distribution preferences. You can’t force a private organization to distribute its content on the platform you like best, just as we’ve called out attempts to force social media platforms to carry content they don’t want to carry.

But the fact that the NFL is legally allowed to be this myopic doesn’t make it a smart business decision. You can be entirely within your rights and still be making a spectacularly bad call.

Advertisement

Since 2013, the NFL has had a “content partnership” with X (dating back to when it was the useful site known as Twitter). The deal lets X publish real-time highlights, and in return the league gets… money, presumably. As the court noted in its ruling:

Since 2013, the NFL and X (formerly Twitter, Inc.) have had a “content partnership.” It allows X to publish real-time highlights from football games, such as touchdowns. During the offseason, reporters post on X with news about team practices and other NFL-related topics, and fans on X discuss teams’ acquisitions of free agents and other roster changes. For example, during the NFL draft (the high-profile annual event in which teams select eligible players to join their rosters), X published more than one million posts concerning the NFL; these appeared on users’ screens more than 800 million times. The NFL has repeatedly renewed its partnership with X. Fans do not pay money to receive NFL news on X.

Fine. Lots of organizations have deals with social media platforms. But this just seems like self-sabotage: the NFL apparently used this partnership as justification to tell its own teams they couldn’t even exist on a competing platform. Multiple NFL teams—including the New England Patriots—had set up accounts on Bluesky, started posting, and were building audiences. And then the league office stepped in and told them to shut it all down.

From the ruling:

Initially, multiple NFL teams, including the New England Patriots, had accounts on Bluesky to communicate with fans….

As alleged, however, the NFL later instructed its member teams to delete their Bluesky accounts. But for this instruction, at least some NFL teams would use Bluesky. The Patriots’ vice president of content, Fred Kirsch, for example, has stated: “Whenever the league gives us the green light[,] we’ll get back on Bluesky.”

Advertisement

Yes, the (Super Bowl-losing) Patriots’ VP of content is publicly saying his team wants to be on Bluesky and is just waiting for the league to let them. This wasn’t a case of teams being uninterested. Teams saw the audience there, set up shop, and were actively communicating with fans—and the NFL made them stop.

As Front Office Sports reported at the time, the league specifically told the Patriots to take down their Bluesky account. The league apparently hasn’t even approved Threads—Meta’s X competitor—for team real-time updates either.

So the NFL has essentially decided that when it comes to the kind of real-time updates that fans actually care about, X is the only approved outlet. Everything else is locked out.

This is “broadcast-brain” thinking applied to the internet, and it’s spectacularly dumb.

Advertisement

The NFL is treating social media platforms the way it treats regional sports networks or its Sunday Ticket package: as exclusive territories to be carved up and sold to the highest bidder. In the television world, that model makes a certain kind of sense—there’s a limited amount of spectrum, a limited number of cable channels, and that scarcity creates value. But social media doesn’t work that way. There’s no scarcity. Posting an injury report on Bluesky doesn’t remove it from X. Cross-posting is literally free. The entire point of social media for a brand is to be everywhere your audience is.

And the audience, increasingly, is on Bluesky. As Mashable noted last year heading into the season, the NFL community on Bluesky had already hit a kind of critical mass:

You need the presence and regular posting of big names to legitimize a platform. It certainly helped that folks like Kimes and a large portion of the NFL writers at popular sports sites like The Ringer made Bluesky home. And last season it felt like Bluesky hit terminal velocity, where enough people joined that you could fully exit to the site for football content. And with the migration of the professionals, the shitposters naturally came along, too. Because that’s where the discussion was happening. There is genuine, easy-to-find, fun NFL talk on Bluesky with minimal interruptions from, say, weird ads or angry reply guys you might find on X.

That’s a real community. A vibrant, engaged community of exactly the kind of hardcore football fans that the NFL should be desperate to cultivate. These are, as Mashable noted, the “ball knowers.” They’ve moved to Bluesky because, well, X kind of sucks now for following sports. As Mashable also noted:

Bluesky does have a leg-up in some areas — Elon Musk’s site recently has proven unreliable for NFL fans. The site crashed the morning free agency launched, which is one of the most important days for NFL social media. And the sports tab — which used to be an easy, fun way to follow games in the Twitter days — degraded into near uselessness years ago. And, in general, X has morphed with Musk’s image, which is focused more on AI and politics — not things like following football. Of course you can still follow the NFL on X, but it does involve wading through more junk than it used to. Bluesky offers an interesting alternative in that regard.

So the most engaged, most knowledgeable football community has moved to Bluesky. The teams themselves want to be on Bluesky. And the NFL’s response to all of this is… to ban its teams from showing up.

Advertisement

It’s the digital equivalent of a local blackout (something we’ve been calling out for well over a decade)—punishing your most dedicated fans because of some deal you cut with a middleman in an effort to create an artificial and unnecessary scarcity.

Meanwhile, the platform the NFL is propping up with this exclusivity arrangement is one where fans who tuned in for the Super Bowl halftime show got to watch a significant chunk of the X user base have a full-blown racist meltdown over Bad Bunny performing. The NFL specifically chose Bad Bunny to appeal to a broader, more global audience—and the audience that actually appreciated the choice? They were on Bluesky where there was an overwhelming wave of support for the performance. The league is betting its real-time presence on the platform where its expansion strategy gets shouted down, while blocking teams from the one where those new fans are actually showing up.

This kind of control-freakery from the NFL shouldn’t surprise anyone who has followed the league’s behavior over the years. This is the same organization that has spent decades aggressively lying to bars, restaurants, and small businesses about the scope of its “Super Bowl” trademarks, sending threatening letters suggesting you can’t even say the words “Super Bowl” in an ad without a license—something that has never actually been true.

The NFL’s institutional DNA is “control equals value,” and they apply that logic to everything, from what a church can call its viewing party to which social media apps their teams are permitted to use.

Advertisement

The problem is that control-based thinking only works when you actually can control the ecosystem. You can (sort of) control which networks broadcast your games. You can control which streaming service gets Sunday Ticket. You cannot control where fans choose to talk about football on the internet. The conversation is going to happen whether the NFL’s official accounts are there or not. The only question is whether the league’s teams get to participate in it.

Any organization whose core business depends on fan engagement should be finding fans where they are, not herding them onto a single platform because you cut an exclusivity deal. Especially when that platform is increasingly known for being a hellscape of AI slop, political rage, and engagement-bait, while the platform you’re blocking your teams from is the one where people are actually talking about your product with genuine enthusiasm.

The NFL generates billions in revenue. And yet, when it comes to social media strategy, it’s stuck in a 2005 mindset. That’s not how any of this works anymore.

Someone at NFL HQ needs to understand that when your most passionate fans have moved to a new platform and your own teams are begging for permission to follow them there, the smart play is to let them go.

Advertisement

Filed Under: blackouts, exclusivity, fans, football, social media

Companies: bluesky, nfl, twitter, x

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

OpenAI strikes a deal with the Defense Department to deploy its AI models

Published

on

OpenAI has reached an agreement with the Defense Department to deploy its models in the agency’s network, company chief Sam Altman has revealed on X. In his post, he said two of OpenAI’s most important safety principles are “prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems.” Altman claimed the company put those principles in its agreement with the agency, which he called by the government’s preferred name of Department of War (DoW), and that it had agreed to honor them.

The agency has closed the deal with OpenAI, shortly after President Donald Trump ordered all government agencies to stop using Claude and any other Anthropic services. If you’ll recall, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth previously threatened to label Anthropic “supply chain risk” if it continues refusing to remove the guardrails on its AI, which are preventing the technology to be used for mass surveillance against Americans and in fully autonomous weapons.

It’s unclear why the government agreed to team up with OpenAI if its models also have the same guardrails, but Altman said it’s asking the government to offer the same terms to all the AI companies it works with. Jeremy Lewin, the Senior Official Under Secretary for Foreign Assistance, Humanitarian Affairs, and Religious Freedom, said on X that DoW “references certain existing legal authorities and includes certain mutually agreed upon safety mechanisms” in its contracts. Both OpenAI and xAI, which had also previously signed a deal to deploy Grok in the DoW’s classified systems, agreed to those terms. He said it was the same “compromise that Anthropic was offered, and rejected.”

Anthropic, which started working with the US government in 2024, refused to bow down to Hegseth. In its latest statement, published just hours before Altman announced OpenAI’s agreement, it repeated its stance. “No amount of intimidation or punishment from the Department of War will change our position on mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons,” Anthropic wrote. “We will challenge any supply chain risk designation in court.”

Advertisement

Altman added in his post on X that OpenAI will build technical safeguards to ensure the company’s models behave as they should, claiming that’s also what the DoW wanted. It’s sending engineers to work with the agency to “ensure [its models’] safety,” and it will only deploy on cloud networks. As The New York Times notes, OpenAI is not yet on Amazon cloud, which the government uses. But that could change soon, as company has also just announced forming a partnership with Amazon to run its models on Amazon Web Services (AWS) for enterprise customers.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Wicklow’s Trinity Biotech secures $25m in SEPA funding

Published

on

The NASDAQ-listed company can access discretionary funds through a 36-month agreement with New Jersey’s Yorkville Advisors.

Irish health diagnostic solutions company Trinity Biotech has secured new funding of up to $25m through a standby equity purchase agreement (SEPA), with proceeds going towards R&D programmes and commercialisation initiatives.

The SEPA deal in conjunction with Yorkville Advisors – based in New Jersey, US – gives Trinity Biotech the option, but with no obligation, to sell up to $25m of newly issued American depositary shares to Yorkville at its discretion over a period of up to 36 months.

John Gillard, Trinity Biotech president and CEO, said: “Our key strategic objectives at Trinity Biotech are to grow our existing business profitably and to advance our exciting innovation agenda, including our flagship development CGM+.”

Advertisement

CGM+ is the company’s new continuous glucose monitoring platform, currently in the later stages of device development, which uses a “proprietary needle-free glucose sensor” that eliminates the need for “finger-stick calibration” by users, the company said.

“This financing agreement provides us with significant additional capability to progress these objectives,” Gillard added.

NASDAQ-listed Trinity Biotech, based in Bray, Co Wicklow, is a commercial stage biotech company focused on diabetes management solutions and human diagnostics, including wearable biosensors. It sells direct in the US and through a network of distributors and partners in more than 75 countries.

The company reported revenues of $48.6m over a trailing 12-month period ended September 30 2025, and said it expects continued operational and financial progress into 2026, based in significant part on it catering to continued global demand for HIV testing provisions.

Advertisement

Innovations currently in development at Trinity Biotech include a cancer monitoring technology and a biomarker-based bioinformatics diagnostic platform.

In April 2023, Trinity Biotech agreed to sell its life sciences supply business to Switzerland’s Biosynth for $30m. A year earlier, a $45m investment in the Trinity Biotech from South Korea’s MiCo saw it take a 29.9pc share of the Irish company.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft testing Windows 11 batch file security improvements

Published

on

Windows

Microsoft is rolling out new Windows 11 Insider Preview builds that improve security and performance during batch file or CMD script execution.

As Microsoft explained today, IT administrators can now enable a more secure processing mode that prevents batch files from being modified while they run by adding the LockBatchFilesInUse registry value under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Command Processor.

Policy authors can also enable this mode using the LockBatchFilesWhenInUse application manifest control.

Wiz

This change is designed to boost performance and security in enterprise environments where admins rely heavily on scripted workflows.

“We are giving administrators and Application Control for Business policy authors additional controls over the processing of batch files and CMD scripts. Starting with this release, administrators may enable a more secure mode for processing batch files that ensures they do not change during execution,” the Windows Insider team said.

Advertisement

“This enhances the performance and security of batch file processing when code integrity is enabled, as signature validation will only be required to be performed a single time, instead of per statement executed in the batch file.”

With today’s Windows Insider builds, Microsoft has also improved the Shared audio feature, introduced in October, which allows sharing audio between two headphones, speakers, earbuds, or hearing aids.

Shared Audio volume sliders
Shared Audio volume sliders (Microsoft)

Previously, volume adjustments affected both users equally, but the new update adds individual volume sliders for each listener and device. A new taskbar indicator also appears during active sharing sessions to provide a visual reminder and a one-click shortcut to sharing settings.

The compatible device lineup has also expanded to include more Bluetooth LE Audio accessories, with the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro, Sony WF-1000XM6, and Xbox Wireless Headset now also supporting the feature.

These new capabilities are rolling out to Windows Insiders in the Beta and Dev channels who have installed Windows 11 Preview Build 26220.7934 (KB5077242) and Windows 11 Preview Build 26300.7939 (KB5077243), respectively.

Advertisement

Modern IT infrastructure moves faster than manual workflows can handle.

In this new Tines guide, learn how your team can reduce hidden manual delays, improve reliability through automated response, and build and scale intelligent workflows on top of tools you already use.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

NaCl Casting Technique Really Earns Its Salt

Published

on

Sodium Chloride has a melting point of 801 C (1,474 F), putting it comfortably between commonly-cast materials like aluminum and bronze. Which led to [Robinson Foundry] asking the question: can you cast salt like a metal? The answer, surprisingly, was yes!

[Robinson] tries casting the salt with two different methods: like it was glass, and like it was metal. In the glass-like casting, he packs a ceramic mold with salt and tosses it into an electric kiln, there to melt and very slowly cool. In metal-like casting, he just tosses salt into a crucible and melts it in the same beer-can kiln we saw when we featured his lost-pla casting a while back. The molten salt is poured very carefully into sand casting molds. If you’re familiar with the technique, you can skip to about 5:20 when he does the reveal.

As it turns out, the sand casting works out much better. While the glass-style casting in the electric kiln grew much larger crystals and so is more translucent, it’s also stuck completely inside the porous ceramic. Perhaps the ceramic would need glazed to pull off that technique?

On the other hand, the sand reacts with the salt in some way– molten salt isn’t exactly a noble gas, after all–to create a lovely gunmetal finish to the parts. They almost look like metal, though the brittleness gives away the game when he opens the mold to show a dagger in several pieces. For the decorative busts and megalodon teeth in the test, though, it is a great success.

Advertisement

Now, we’re not going to say this video came about because of high metal prices, or comment on what sort of trade policies might be driving up the price of metals like aluminum in the USA, but we do think this a great hack. While salt-based castings are obviously going to have very different physical properties than metal, for decorative work, it creates a lovely finish out of a material that’s cheap as dirt. Hopefully he comes back to the glass-style casting; we would not want to trust that black coating around food, and a salt crystal salt shaker sounds too good to pass up.

The only times we’ve seen molten salt around here is in nuclear reactors, and in homemade batteries, though that first one obviously wasn’t table salt.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Omloop Het Nieuwsblad Free Streams: How to watch the first cobbled classic of 2026

Published

on

There have been skirmishes in the desert nations and a plethora of small stage races on the Iberian Peninsula but this is where the warm-up ends and proper racing begins. This is Belgium, and this is the opening weekend.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

These 5 US Airlines Are Most Likely To Have Regular Flight Delays

Published

on





Nobody likes a delayed flight; it’s inconvenient, throws plans into disarray, and puts additional costs on both passengers and the airline. There could be several reasons for such events — from technical issues and weather changes to personnel strikes and busy airspaces — and in many cases, the airline has no direct control over them. Nevertheless, some airlines have a better grip on their operations than their competitors, allowing them to keep delays at a minimum.

So, if you’re booking a flight and want to reduce your chances of getting hit with a late departure (or even a canceled flight), we’re looking at five American carriers that had the greatest number of delays by percentage. We based our numbers on the U.S. DOT’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics reports on arrival performance by marketing carrier, with data from March to October 2025. Unfortunately, we’re unsure if we’ll get more recent data, as the biggest U.S. airlines have asked the DOT to stop publishing performance statistics and are lobbying to make flying much worse for everyone.

Furthermore, we looked at the ratio of delayed flights versus the total number of flights. After all, it would be unfair to compare Delta, which had 207,770 delays out of more than 1.1 million flights and one of the best on-time performance rates in the United States, with Frontier, which operated fewer than 134,000 flights, of which more than 37,000 arrived late.

Advertisement

Frontier Airlines

The worst performer by far is Frontier Airlines, with 37,329 delays out of a total of 133,328 flights in the counted period. This meant that 28%, or more than one in four flights, were delayed. It also had the second-highest number of cancellations, with 2,111 flights, or 1.58% of its schedule, getting called off. This is probably one of the reasons why this airline is at the bottom of reliability and customer satisfaction rankings, with its cheap fares being the only thing going right for its passengers.

While airlines cannot do anything about airport traffic congestion and weather-based delays and cancellations, other issues, like crew scheduling limitations, can often be mitigated through advanced crew scheduling systems. Even delays caused by unforeseen technical problems at hub airports can be fixed with the ready availability of backup aircraft or by reducing the number of flights each airframe is assigned per day. However, these measures can be costly for airlines, especially for low-cost carriers that rely on razor-thin margins.

Advertisement

What’s worse is that Frontier says that it does not offer reimbursements, hotel accommodations, or monetary compensation to passengers who are impacted by flight delays or cancellations. The best that you can get is a seat on the next available Frontier flight and meal vouchers if your delay or rebooking is more than three hours and is considered a “controllable situation” like delayed baggage, aircraft damage, or a mechanical issue. If the delay is defined as an “uncontrollable situation,” like those caused by weather, Air Traffic Control, or an incident like a bird strike, then all you can get is a flight rebooking. Alternatively, you can seek a full refund under 14 CFR Part 260 if the delay is over three hours for domestic flights and six hours for international flights.

Advertisement

JetBlue

JetBlue is the second-worst airline when it comes to delays, with 38,117, or 24.52% of flights, arriving 15 minutes late (or longer) out of a total of 155,432 scheduled flights. While this isn’t as bad as Frontier, it is still close to one in four flights getting delayed. It also ranked third when it comes to cancellations, with 1,885, or 1.21% of flights, affected. This number is likely influenced by the emergency software update on Airbus A320 family aircraft in late 2025 that resulted in numerous cancellations and delays. The update was prompted after a JetBlue A320 made an uncommanded rapid descent in flight due to solar radiation. This is especially notable given that JetBlue’s fleet is composed entirely of Airbus aircraft.

JetBlue outlines its policy regarding reimbursements and options in case of delays or cancellations. According to the airline’s website, flights affected by weather disruptions, domestic delays of more than three hours, international delays of more than six hours, or a change from nonstop to a connecting or stopover flight are eligible for a fee waiver. This allows you to change your flight at no extra cost or receive a full refund to the original form of payment.

Advertisement

American Airlines

This is the first and only mainline carrier that lands on our list of airlines with the worst on-time performance. According to the U.S. DOT, out of American’s 1,363,530 flights (which, incidentally, is the highest number of scheduled flights within our time frame), 333,396 flights, or 24.45%, were delayed. That number is so high that it’s greater than the total number of flights operated by Frontier and JetBlue combined. American Airlines is also the worst airline when it comes to cancellations, with the carrier scrapping 28,204, or 2.07%, of its schedules.

Nevertheless, it seems that American is trying to do something about this, at least for affected passengers. The airline is said to be testing an AI tool that keeps track of passengers who could potentially miss their connecting flights because of a delay on a prior flight. It will then adjust the connecting flight without affecting the rest of the day’s schedule, ensuring that passengers can still reach their destination on time. This system will also benefit the airline, as it wouldn’t have to deal with rebooking the affected passengers (although it could likely infuriate other customers who might have to wait up to an hour for the incoming flight).

If you’re flying with American and you experience a significant delay or cancellation caused by the airline, it says that it will give you a voucher for an approved hotel plus round-trip transportation to the airport if the delay is overnight. Furthermore, it will provide meal vouchers for delays that are three or more hours after the scheduled departure. Unfortunately, if you’re affected by unforeseen delays and cancellations caused by weather, you’re not entitled to anything except a rebooking on the next flight with available seats at no extra charge.

Advertisement

Allegiant

Despite having one of the fewest numbers of flights (second only to Hawaiian before it merged with Alaska Airlines), Allegiant still managed to have one of the worst on-time performances. This airline had 22,210 delays, which is 24.40% of its total of 91,015 flights. But despite offering some of the cheapest airfares available, it still manages to have the best cancellation record in our time frame, reporting only 238 canceled flights, or just 0.26% of its entire schedule.

Just like Frontier, which is also a low-cost carrier, Allegiant says it does not offer delayed passengers any meals, alternate transportation, or reimbursement for incurred overnight expenses. If your flight is rescheduled due to a delay or cancellation and you choose not to take it, your only available options are to either change to a different flight on the same route or cancel the remaining flights and receive a refund for the unused portions of your ticket.

This might be a deal breaker for some people, but those who are looking for the best possible deals on airfare might be willing to take the risk. The airline mentions on its page the possibility of getting reimbursed by Allianz Travel Insurance for cancellations. So, it might be a worthwhile investment to spend a little extra on this type of insurance, which is one of the services that AAA offers and is likely far more affordable than a ticket on a legacy airline.

Advertisement

Southwest Airlines

After the big three (American, Delta, and United), Southwest Airlines has the greatest number of flights, at 954,366 scheduled flights. However, it also has a significant number of delays, at 211,262 flights, or 22.14% of its schedule. Nevertheless, it does have a good track record when it comes to cancellations, with only 5,602 canceled flights, or just 0.59% of its total number of flights.

Southwest Airlines pioneered the low-cost carrier (LCC) model, so just like the other LCCs listed above, don’t expect to get any benefits from it in case of a delay, except the bare minimum required by law. Nevertheless, it is one of the U.S. airlines that offers onboard Wi-Fi, costing just $8 per device throughout the entire flight. While you may not appreciate this service for short hops around the country, you might find it an indispensable yet affordable offering on the airline’s longest routes, like the more than seven-hour flight from Phoenix to Honolulu.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This Ryobi Carpet Cleaner Uses Modern Tech To Help You Wash & Dry With Ease

Published

on





We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

Fans of the Ryobi brand will already know that its 18V One+ cordless battery line stretches well beyond DIY-focused power tools. Ryobi also offers a range of home landscaping tools that run using the same battery packs, and buyers looking for cleaning products aren’t short of 18V One+ options either. With so many battery-powered tools and products in Ryobi’s current lineup, it can be easy to overlook a few of them, but one that shouldn’t be missed is the brand’s SwiftClean rug and carpet cleaner.

Advertisement

It’s available at Home Depot as a standalone tool for $299, or as a bundle with two 4Ah batteries for $384.64. Both versions come with two brush rolls and a bottle of Ryobi’s cleaning solution. Ryobi makes the washing and drying process as simple as possible, with one tank in the cleaner to dispense cleaning solution when you push the cleaner forwards, and another tank that collects dirty solution when you pull it backwards. By moving the cleaner forwards and backwards across either carpets or rugs, you can clean and dry them without needing to swap between tools.

The cleaner isn’t cheap, but buyers who have picked the tool up at Home Depot are almost unanimously satisfied with their purchase. At the time of writing, the cleaner has accrued a few dozen reviews with an average rating of 4.8 out of five stars across them. When asked, 91% of those reviewers said they’d be happy to recommend it.

Advertisement

Some reviewers report drawbacks with the cleaner

While the initial reviews don’t suggest buyers have any worries about durability or longevity, the cleaner is covered by Ryobi’s long warranty just in case. Like most 18V One+ tools, the cleaner is covered for three years after purchase, and if you buy the bundle with the two batteries, they’re covered by the same warranty too. Anyone with a lot of Ryobi tools to keep track of could download the brand’s app, where they can register their tools and access customer service if necessary.

Durability might not be a concern, but one reviewer at Home Depot reported that the cleaner’s washing and drying function might not work with every type of rug. They claim that, when trying to clean a rug that they describe as being “very flat,” the cleaner returned an error. However, when using the cleaner on a different “shag type rug,” the error would go away. 

Advertisement

Another reviewer expressed concern with Ryobi’s recommendation to mix cleaning solution in the clean water tank, which they claim left a residue on the carpet. Furthermore, they claim that even after pulling the tool back to dry the carpet, it was still left partially wet. Several reviewers also note that the tool can get through multiple batteries on longer jobs.

It’s not perfect then, but there’s still plenty to like about Ryobi’s high-tech rug and carpet cleaner. It’s one of many Ryobi tools that can help make spring cleaning a breeze, with the brand also offering everything from power scrubbers to pet-friendly vacuum cleaners.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Google quantum-proofs HTTPS by squeezing 2.5kB of data into 64-byte space – Ars Technica

Published

on

Google and other browser makers require that all TLS certificates be published in public transparency logs, which are append-only distributed ledgers. Website owners can then check the logs in real time to ensure that no rogue certificates have been issued for the domains they use. The transparency programs were implemented in response to the 2011 hack of Netherlands-based DigiNotar, which allowed the minting of 500 counterfeit certificates for Google and other websites, some of which were used to spy on web users in Iran.

Once viable, Shor’s algorithm could be used to forge classical encryption signatures and break classical encryption public keys of the certificate logs. Ultimately, an attacker could forge signed certificate timestamps used to prove to a browser or operating system that a certificate has been registered when it hasn’t.

To rule out this possibility, Google is adding cryptographic material from quantum-resistant algorithms such as ML-DSA. This addition would allow forgeries only if an attacker were to break both classical and post-quantum encryption. The new regime is part of what Google is calling the quantum-resistant root store, which will complement the Chrome Root Store the company formed in 2022.

The MTCs use Merkle Trees to provide quantum-resistant assurances that a certificate has been published without having to add most of the lengthy keys and hashes. Using other techniques to reduce the data sizes, the MTCs will be roughly the same 64-byte length they are now, Westerbaan said.

Advertisement

The new system has already been implemented in Chrome. For the time being, Cloudflare is enrolling roughly 1,000 TLS certificates to test how well the MTCs work. For now, Cloudflare is generating the distributed ledger. The plan is for CAs to eventually fill that role. The Internet Engineering Task Force standards body has recently formed a working group called the PKI, Logs, And Tree Signatures, which is coordinating with other key players to develop a long-term solution.

“We view the adoption of MTCs and a quantum-resistant root store as a critical opportunity to ensure the robustness of the foundation of today’s ecosystem,” Google’s Friday blog post said. “By designing for the specific demands of a modern, agile internet, we can accelerate the adoption of post-quantum resilience for all web users.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Vivo X300 FE Moves Closer to Debut; X300 Ultra Could Get Dual Teleconverter Kit

Published

on

Following the company’s expansion of its X-series lineup in the past few months, Vivo is now gearing up to launch the Vivo X300 FE and Vivo X300 Ultra. The X300 FE has been reported to have obtained certifications from IMDA and TUV, indicating that the handset is close to release in the market. On the other hand, the X300 Ultra is expected to come with a dual lens teleconverter kit.

Vivo X300 FE

vivo X300 Fe image from the back

Vivo’s upcoming X300 FE, with model number V2537, has appeared on IMDA and TUV certification websites. The TUV listing suggests the phone may support 90W wired fast charging. On the other hand, the IMDA certification confirms that the device will come with 5G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC connectivity. Since devices typically receive these certifications close to launch, the X300 FE’s debut could be just around the corner.

The Vivo X300 FE is looking like a compact flagship with punch. It will be powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, accompanied by LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage. The phone may feature a 6.31-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate for smoother and clearer visuals.

Despite the smartphone being compact, the battery appears quite large, measuring around 6,500mAh, and may include silicon-carbon technology to enhance battery life. As far as the camera is concerned, there are rumors of a triple camera system, which will include a 50MP primary sensor, a 50MP periscope telephoto lens, and an ultra-wide lens. The front camera may benefit from a 50MP sensor optimized by ZEISS. The phone is also expected to come with IP68/IP69 ratings and a high-quality glass and metal body.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Close up of vivo X300 Pro cameras

According to recent rumors, the Vivo X300 Ultra could introduce a dual-lens external teleconverter kit for better zoom photography. The setup may offer a 400mm fixed-focus lens and support 200mm focal-length shooting. Users would likely switch between the two options instead of using them together. Vivo builds the system on its V-mount platform to deliver a more professional optical zoom experience.

The Vivo X300 Ultra is looking like a real flagship, with the best hardware inside. The phone is expected to come with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, which will provide great gaming performance and multitasking capabilities. The camera system will include a dual-camera setup with two 200MP cameras from Sony and Samsung, along with a 5MP multispectral camera and a 50MP ultra-wide lens.

Advertisement

The camera system may include ZEISS T* coating and optical image stabilization to improve overall image quality. In terms of battery life, rumors suggest the phone will feature a massive 7,000mAh battery that supports 100W wired charging and 40W wireless charging. When combined with an IP69 rating and USB 3.2 support, this phone suddenly feels like a real flagship.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

What’re The Differences Between Freightliner And Western Star Semi Trucks?

Published

on





Western Star and Freightliner are owned by Daimler Trucks North America, and both of these brands are powered by diesel engines, which are ideal for long-haul trucking. Where they differ is in their specific applications, the type of users they are aimed at, and some variations in their design approaches.

Freightliner semi trucks are focused on the demands of long-haul transportation and are often found in large trucking fleets. This could have a lot to do with why Freightliner is the top dog in Class 8 truck sales, claiming 35.2% of all sales in 2025, with a total of 73,360 trucks sold out of a yearly total of 208,155. By comparison, Western Star, which places more emphasis on the mining, logging, and construction markets, finished 2025 with a grand total of 11,496 Class 8 trucks, giving it a 5.5% share of the pie. Freightliner sells many more units than Western Star does.

Another major difference between Freightliner and Western Star semi trucks is in the way they are built. Western Star trucks are ruggedly built for the rigors of their intended markets, which requires firmer, heavy-duty suspensions as well as reinforced frame structures. This compares to what is important for a Freightliner truck that will be used for hauling freight long distances — good fuel economy, overall efficiency, and low cost of ownership matter most to the fleet operators who run Freightliners.

Advertisement

What else should you know about Freightliner And Western Star semi trucks?

The differences between Freightliner and Western Star semi trucks extend to the engines that power them. Freightliners are built for cruising the highways with minimal fuel consumption, so fuel-sipping engines like the Detroit DD13 and DD15 are commonly used. For to the specific needs of the operators of Western Star trucks, something more brawny like the Detroit 57X and 49X have the required output, measured in both higher horsepower and torque, to do the job on the logging trail or while hauling ore from the mine.

Freightliner trucks tend to retain more value, largely due to an extensive parts and service network, making it easy to get your Freightliner truck fixed wherever you roam. Western Star trucks also hold their value well — they are appreciated by those who use them for their intended missions, where their ultimate strength and on-the-job durability are highly valued. 

Advertisement

For over-the-road freight hauling, the Freightliner trucks are the undisputed champions in terms of sales. Freightliner semi trucks have been designed to provide the aerodynamic performance and overall fuel efficiency that both fleets and individual owner-operators can appreciate in their day-to-day operations. Western Star semi trucks, made in two U.S. plants, are better suited to the heavy-duty demands of construction, mining, and logging, in which their more rugged structures and more powerful engines make them ideally suited for these missions.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025