Connect with us

Tech

The pricing for the Ryzen AI MAX+ PRO 495 192GB version has not been finalized yet

Published

on


  • CHUWI UniBox AI495 Pro carries up to 192GB of unified memory
  • The Ryzen AI MAX+ PRO 495 reaches 5.2 GHz across 16 cores
  • CHUWI’s new mini workstation can run 300 billion parameter models locally

CHUWI has unveiled the UniBox AI495 Pro at IFA Berlin 2026, combining AMD‘s new Ryzen AI MAX+ PRO 495 chip with unusually high memory capacity.

The compact machine can carry up to 192GB of LPDDR5x memory, matching the maximum memory offered by Apple‘s latest workstation.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

The 9 Best TV Shows to Stream This Month (September 2026)

Published

on

September is typically the time when television gets serious again. The summer’s biggest TV shows have aired their finales, the fall schedule is kicking into high gear, and streamers are rolling out everything from high-concept sci-fi to prestige dramas. There’s plenty of familiar IP in the mix, but also some genuinely original shows worth putting on your to-watch list.

While plenty of outlets will tell you what everyone is watching (see: Reacher), that’s not our goal. As always, the TV shows we’re watching this month reflect the kinds of stories WIRED covers every day—shows that explore technology, science, politics, culture, and the sometimes unsettling ways they intersect.

From returning favorites to ambitious new series—and at least one show that might rekindle your love of traditional anime—these are the TV shows we think you should make time to stream this month.

The Paper

What happens when a newspaper attempts not just to survive, but to thrive, in a world where digital media has become the norm? The Paper, a spinoff of The Office from Greg Daniels and Michael Koman, follows the staff of a struggling Midwestern paper as they attempt to revive it.

Advertisement

Ultimately, its idealistic new editor-in-chief Ned Sampson (Star Wars and Harry Potter alum Domhnall Gleeson) and his hungry young reporter Mare Pritti (Chelsea Frei) end up grappling with what journalism looks like in the digital age. Season 2, which arrived on September 9, finds their Toledo Truth Teller newly revitalized and searching for its next big scoop, making the show a surprisingly sharp comedy about the future of journalism—and who gets to shape it.

Lego Star Wars: The Mandalorian

Though this summer’s The Mandalorian and Grogu (which is streaming on Disney+ now) seriously underperformed at the box office, Lucasfilm is partnering with Lego to take another stab at the fan-favorite Star Wars series—which might be exactly what the franchise needs right now. Lucasfilm and Lego are going back to the beginning, reimagining all three seasons of the Pedro Pascal–starring live-action series as a 49-minute animated comedy.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Amazon Quick is now available on desktop, with a new mobile activity feed

Published

on

Amazon has made its Quick desktop assistant generally available on macOS and Windows, pitching it to enterprise IT as the governed alternative to shadow AI. Quick runs in ordinary European AWS regions with inference kept inside Europe, but it is not on the published service list for the sovereign cloud AWS opened in Brandenburg in January to put European data beyond the reach of US law.

Amazon has made its Quick desktop app generally available on macOS and Windows, AWS said, and added an activity feed to the iOS and Android versions that pools email, calendar, CRM and messaging into one list.

The pitch is governance. Amazon says customer data stays inside the customer’s own environment, conversations stay private, and audit trails run through CloudWatch and CloudTrail. It describes the underlying AWS as the infrastructure behind the world’s most security-sensitive workloads.

The compliance list is HIPAA, FedRAMP, SOC 2 and ISO 27001. The argument underneath is that shadow AI is what happens when staff route around approved tools, and that the answer is a sanctioned assistant rather than a ban.

Advertisement

In Europe that argument runs into a distinction Amazon drew itself in January.

Quick has run in the AWS Frankfurt region since March, with inference requests routed only within European regions. It also runs in London and Ireland.

Those are ordinary AWS regions.

The AWS European Sovereign Cloud is not. It opened in Brandenburg on 14 January, staffed only by EU residents and overseen by a board of EU citizens, on a commitment of EUR 7.8B.

Advertisement

Quick does not appear on its published service list. SageMaker and Bedrock do.

The distinction matters to the buyers Amazon is describing. Airbus is moving 70 applications off AWS to the French provider Scaleway, out of roughly 900 it runs, on a contract worth more than EUR 50M.

Its stated test was legal safeguards against non-European laws. The law in question is the US CLOUD Act, which reaches American companies’ data wherever in the world it is held.

Then there is the question of whether anyone pays. Of the Microsoft 365 users who can reach Copilot Chat, 3.3% pay for Copilot, about 15 million seats out of 450 million.

Advertisement

Amazon names three customers in the announcement, Southwest Airlines, Labcorp and the PGA Tour. All three quotes are supplied testimonials. The post gives no pricing, no seat numbers and no date for sovereign cloud support.

Quick’s case is that it is the assistant IT already controls. In Europe the follow-up is which AWS they control it from, and European rivals are selling the answer.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

The senior technology analyst taking part in a graduate programme

Published

on

BearingPoint’s Laura Kealy explores how she found herself working as a senior technology analyst.

Donegal native Laura Kealy found her secondary education abruptly interrupted in 2020 with the onset of the global pandemic. From there, she went on to pursue management science and information systems studies at Trinity College Dublin, before undertaking a graduate programme at management and tech consulting firm BearingPoint. 

“Maths and business were my favourite subjects in school, which led me to pursue a degree that combined both subjects alongside technology. While I enjoyed the technical side of my studies, I also knew I wanted a career that involved working closely with people and helping to solve real-world problems,” Kealy told SiliconRepublic.com. 

She explained that BearingPoint stood out to her after interacting with future team members at a college careers fair. Kealy said, “Everyone I spoke to was welcoming, genuine and passionate about what they did, which gave me a great impression of the company culture.”

Advertisement
Can you describe a typical day in your role? 

One of the things I enjoy most about my role is the variety. A typical day might involve meeting with clients to understand their requirements, collaborating with my teammates to solve technical challenges, and then carrying out hands-on work such as analysing data in Power BI, writing PowerShell scripts or creating project documentation.

I also enjoy the collaborative aspect of the work I do. Whether it’s working with teammates or engaging directly with clients, there’s always an opportunity to learn from others. I have been fortunate to work with people who are always willing to share their knowledge and help me develop my skills. 

Did your responsibilities and workload change as the programme progressed? 

At BearingPoint, I’ve always been encouraged to learn through hands-on experience and client-facing work. Being part of a small team meant I was trusted early on with responsibilities and given opportunities to make an impact, while still having the support of my colleagues around me.

As I’ve grown more confident in my role, my workload and responsibilities have naturally increased, progressing from supporting project activities to leading key client deliverables. I’ve also had the opportunity to collaborate with colleagues at all levels of the organisation, from fellow graduates right through to directors and partners.

Advertisement

Working with people from different backgrounds and experiences has taught me new ways of thinking and approaching challenges.

What skills have you developed since being part of the company’s programme?

My technical knowledge has grown significantly through hands-on project work, particularly in areas such as AI, data analysis and Microsoft technologies. I have had great opportunities to continue learning through certifications, training and knowledge-sharing from colleagues.

I have also developed my communication and consulting skills. I’ve become much more confident communicating with different audiences, whether that’s providing updates to my team, presenting to clients or explaining technical concepts to people from a non-technical background.

Learning how to adapt my communication style to different audiences has been one of the most valuable skills I’ve gained throughout the programme and one that I use every day.

Advertisement
What have been the most challenging parts of working life since taking up this programme?

One of the most challenging aspects of my role has been keeping up with the pace of change in technology, particularly with the rapid evolution of AI. Working in this space means continuously learning, especially when you’re helping clients understand how these technologies can be used effectively within their organisations.

What started as a challenge has become something I now really enjoy. Whether it is writing a simple prompt to Copilot or building an advanced AI agent that can complete tasks on your behalf, AI is constantly evolving and there’s always something new to learn and experiment with.

It’s also been rewarding to share what I’ve learned with others and help build confidence in using these tools across different teams and projects.

Would you recommend the graduate programme at this company to others? 

I would definitely recommend the graduate programme at BearingPoint. The combination of challenging work, learning opportunities and a genuinely supportive culture has made it a great place to start my career.

Advertisement

I have had the opportunity to work on large-scale projects, learn from experienced colleagues and develop both technically and professionally. I really enjoy the strong social aspect of the office, with everything from sports and social events to charity initiatives.

Those experiences have made it easy to build relationships and have been a really important part of my time here. 

What advice would you like to give to future graduates who are just starting out?

My advice would be to say yes to opportunities, even if they’re outside your comfort zone. This applies to projectwork, but some of the experiences I’ve learned the most from weren’t necessarily part of my day-to-day role.

Getting involved in different teams, initiatives and events has really helped me develop new skills, build confidence and form great connections across the organisation.

Advertisement

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

IEEE Rewards Sections for High Voter Turnout

Published

on

For this year’s IEEE annual election, the IEEE Tellers Committee will recognize the Sections with the highest voter turnout (based on total eligible voters) in each Region with an incentive reward after the election results are accepted by the IEEE Board of Directors.The incentive initiative is managed by the Tellers Committee, which retains full authority over all rules, operations, and decisions regarding the program.

Incentive guidelines

The Section sizes and their respective reward amounts are:

  • Large sections consist of more than 1,501 eligible voting members. The top-performing large section in each IEEE region will be rewarded with US $1,000.
  • Medium sections consist of 501 to 1,500 eligible voting members. Each region’s top-performing medium section will receive $600.
  • Small sections consist of 500 or fewer eligible voting members. The top-performing small section in each region will receive $400.

To learn more about the incentive program, visit the IEEE annual election website. If you haven’t voted in the 2026 elections, you can learn about the candidates and vote here. Send questions to: elections@ieee.org.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Seattle economic study finds strong tech assets, a risky concentration, and a tax that ‘penalizes’ hiring

Published

on

A new report says Seattle’s economy “may not be in decline, but it is in danger.” (GeekWire Photo / Kevin Lisota)

An independent study commissioned by the City of Seattle says the city’s tax structure is unique among its peers in the way it “specifically penalizes the hiring of senior, high-compensation workers,” with that penalty falling overwhelmingly on large tech employers.

Overall, Seattle’s business taxes are actually in line with competing cities, write researchers from the economic consulting firm Formation in the new report. But Seattle’s taxes are “particularly distortionary when it comes to hiring high-wage employees,” they add.

Mayor Katie Wilson helped design the tax, known as JumpStart, before taking office. But even the strongest supporters of new local and state taxes would concede that Seattle is “reaching the limits of how much it can tax the industries and people that it is depending upon to drive its growth,” the researchers write.

Another risk for the city is the resulting concentration of the tax base. Three-quarters of the payroll tax on large employers comes from 10 companies. Nine of them are in tech-related sectors.

A big company shifting 10,000 workers out of Seattle would cost the city about $50 million a year in payroll tax revenue, the researchers say in an accompanying slide deck, without naming Amazon explicitly. That’s more than a quarter of the $175 million deficit the city projects for next year.

Advertisement

@media (max-width: 600px) {
aside.callout { float:none !important; max-width:100% !important; margin-left:0 !important; margin-right:0 !important; }
aside.callout .callout-img { display:none !important; }
}

In that way, much of the city’s financial future depends “on the marginal location and compensation decisions of a handful of employers,” the report says. Because much of the taxed compensation is vesting stock, it adds, the city’s revenue is exposed to “the single most volatile attribute of these firms — one the city has no ability to forecast or influence.”

Reducing that dependence through growth is the bigger point of the report.

The 127-page assessment, called “Seawall: Building a Resilient Seattle Economy,” goes well beyond the topic of taxes. The title refers to Seattle’s rebuilt waterfront seawall, engineered to hold back the water and also let marine life take hold. The researchers offer this as a model for protecting the city’s economic base while building a more diverse economy on top of it.

Advertisement

A decade of growth lifted wages at every level of the income spectrum, the report finds. Few other U.S. regions spread prosperity as broadly. But the same growth made Seattle far more expensive, especially for families.

Fast-forward to today, and the report sees an economy that’s dangerously concentrated, “significantly more AI-exposed than the national average,” short of the electricity it will need, and no longer producing mid-sized companies.

In danger, not in decline: The report is also careful to point out the city’s unique position and strengths. Seattle’s tech workforce is “almost peerless,” it says: 23% of the nation’s AI engineers are based in the region, and output per tech worker is more than double the national average.

The region also has the rare combination of a big tech industry and a strong manufacturing base.

Advertisement

Seattle “may not be in decline, but it is in danger,” the researchers write — “not because it is losing its place in the industry, but because the industry could undergo a radical change, and arguably already is.”

The concern that Seattle is becoming “the next Cleveland,” raised in a GeekWire column in February by Seattle tech veteran and angel investor Charles Fitzgerald, is “likely hyperbolic,” the researchers write. (They acknowledge that it “caused quite the stir this past winter.”)

The report points instead to Portland and Los Angeles as the more relevant warnings, citing Portland’s pileup of new business taxes and Los Angeles’ failure to turn a deep talent pool into jobs.

Fitzgerald responded Wednesday evening on his blog, Platformonomics, writing that the city “has finally acknowledged there is such a thing as an economy.” His main objection was who wasn’t in the room: “No businesses were involved, but that seems to be the norm hereabouts on economic matters.”

Advertisement

The report’s acknowledgments list dozens of interviewees, including the Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, the Washington Roundtable and the Tech Alliance. No large tech employer is among them.

Ryan Donahue, a co-founder and managing partner at Formation, said in an email that the researchers interviewed many business representatives but no large companies directly, saying he expected a predictable message from their government affairs teams.

The person who led the report’s tax and cost analysis previously ran Amazon HQ2 recruitment at the Virginia Economic Development Partnership, the agency that landed the project for Arlington, Va., Donahue said, providing insights into how firms like Amazon weigh those decisions.

A path forward: The report recommends that the city focus on five industries: artificial intelligence, cleantech, maritime, life sciences and space. Cleantech is the priority, the report says, because Seattle owns or regulates much of what the sector needs, from Seattle City Light to building codes, permitting and land use.

Advertisement

The Seattle Office of Economic Development commissioned the report from Formation in 2025, under then-Mayor Bruce Harrell, to examine the drivers of the city’s business climate.

Harrell’s successor, Mayor Wilson, released the report Wednesday afternoon alongside an executive order convening a task force of business, labor, community and civic leaders, directing the city to improve permitting pathways, and calling for a proposal to create a Seattle Strategic Initiatives Fund.

In releasing the report, Wilson’s office said the findings “are independent and are not City policy.” But speaking on KUOW-FM’s Soundside as the report was released, the mayor called it “fantastic,” describing it as “super nuanced,” and urging listeners to take the time to read it.

The cost of a hire: JumpStart, the payroll expense tax, applies to large employers based on the compensation they pay to high-earning workers in Seattle. Approved by the City Council in 2020 and in effect since 2021, it was created to fund affordable housing, small-business support and climate programs, but the city has increasingly used it for general government operations.

Advertisement

Wilson helped create the tax before running for mayor, saying on her campaign website that she “played an instrumental role in designing and passing” the payroll tax.

Under JumpStart, hiring a software engineer at $650,000 in total compensation costs about $17,000 a year more in Seattle than in Bellevue, the report says. For an employee earning more than $1 million, the difference exceeds $33,000. San Francisco imposes no per-employee tax at all, and New York City’s equivalent is less than $6,000, according to the researchers.

That $17,000 reflects the tax’s top rate, which this year applies only to employers with about $1.3 billion or more in Seattle payroll. Two or three companies at most are in that tier, the report says. At the city’s lowest rate for that pay level, the same engineer would cost about $11,800, according to Seattle’s published rates.

The rate rises with an employee’s pay, and a company that crosses one of the city’s payroll thresholds pays the higher rate on every qualifying worker, not just the next hire.

Advertisement

“No other comparison city has a tax with both of these features,” the report says.

An issue of perception: Business leaders interviewed for the study described JumpStart as a problem “not primarily for its cost but because the process of enacting it communicated that the city’s governing orientation is fundamentally extractive.”

The researchers add: “Whether or not that characterization is fair, it is the operating perception, and perception shapes location decisions.”

But the researchers stop short of recommending a change. Taxes have “modest effects on firm location and expansion decisions,” they write, and Seattle is unlikely to lose its biggest employers to other regions, because the alternatives are either more expensive or have weaker talent.

Advertisement

“The Eastside is the only real threat in that regard,” the report says.

The study is blunt about what is at stake in keeping those employers. “If they leave,” it says, “Seattle won’t become more equal, it will just become poorer.”

What to do about taxes? The report does not recommend raising or lowering that top rate. Research on how firms respond to local taxes draws on thousands of firms across dozens of jurisdictions, it says, and “cannot tell us how any one firm will respond to any one tax change.”

With two or three firms in the top tier and “one firm by far the most dominant,” the question “is fundamentally a question about how that single firm will react.” It adds, “That is not a question this report, or the literature it draws on, is equipped to answer.”

Advertisement

GeekWire has contacted Amazon for comment on the report.

Other tax options that have been floated — vacancy taxes, wealth taxes, head taxes beyond JumpStart, expanded gross receipts schemes — are “either disallowed under state law or would, if enacted, likely push out the firms and workers Seattle most needs to retain,” the report says.

And once the state’s new 9.9% tax on income above $1 million takes effect in 2028, Seattle earners above that level will face a combined state and local marginal rate of about 10.5%. Pushing meaningfully above that, the report says, “would be a high-stakes tax experiment.”

Mayor Katie Wilson with business, labor and community leaders after signing an executive order on the economy Wednesday at the Seattle Office of Economic Development. (City of Seattle Photo)

Where Wilson stands: The mayor has already conceded the Bellevue point. “I don’t think it’s good that it is less expensive to do business in Bellevue than in Seattle,” she said in May. “We’re going to be taking that into consideration.”

She defended the tax in June, crediting it with helping Seattle recover from the pandemic and cautioning against blaming downtown’s problems on any single cause.

Advertisement

Her relationship with the tech community has been rockier. At a Seattle University event in April, asked about that state tax, Wilson said concerns about wealthy residents leaving were “super overblown” — then waved and said, “the ones that leave, like, bye.” The moment drew national coverage and criticism from Seattle investors.

A bet on cleantech: Taking a step back, the report says Seattle’s best opportunity is in cleantech, a category it defines broadly to include clean energy generation, energy efficiency and sustainable production methods and materials.

The shift is already showing up in local venture funding. Cleantech and energy companies took 3% of the venture capital raised by Seattle-area private companies from 2016 to 2020, and 20% from 2021 to 2025, according to Crunchbase data cited in the report. Three companies — TerraPower, Helion and Group14 — account for 70% of that.

The city “should be most concerned about AI but most active in cleantech,” the report says.

Advertisement

AI will ultimately be more important to Seattle’s future, the researchers explain, but the city has almost no ability to shape it. Cleantech is different: Seattle owns the electric utility, writes the building codes and controls permitting and much of the land.

The city can also use its own purchasing power to create a market for what these companies build, the report says, pointing to a New York program that used public housing demand to bring a new cold-climate heat pump into production.

To reach the top tier of cleantech ecosystems, the report says, Seattle would need a dedicated entity putting at least $5 million a year into growing the sector, funded through ratepayer charges, philanthropy, corporate sponsorship and competitive federal grants.

What’s next: According to the city, Wilson’s executive order calls for the task force to convene industry roundtables in the coming months. The report’s own first-year list runs to ten items, including a business-led commission on the city’s fiscal exposure, with an emphasis on AI, and structured visits with 50 companies across the five industries it identifies.

Advertisement

Others include naming a senior staffer in the mayor’s office to run the city’s AI agenda, and a childcare cost-sharing pilot split three ways between employee, employer and city, with the city’s share paid out of JumpStart.

On taxes, the report’s primary recommendation looks beyond City Hall. It urges Wilson to build a cross-partisan coalition of mayors and county executives to press Olympia for new municipal revenue tools, including changes to the state’s 1% cap on property tax growth.

A caller on KUOW asked Wilson whether there’s a limit to how much Seattle should grow. She said she shares the concern, then pointed back to the report, which she said makes clear there is “no graceful path” for Seattle to cool down its growth.

“We can’t go back to the ’90s,” she said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Seattle biotech BrainChild Bio raises $116M to advance CAR T therapy for childhood brain cancer

Published

on

Michael Jensen, left, and Steven Brugger are leading BrainChild Bio. (Photos via BrainChild Bio)

Seattle biotech startup BrainChild Bio has raised $116 million to advance an experimental CAR T cell therapy for one of the deadliest forms of childhood brain cancer.

The Series A financing will primarily fund a pivotal Phase 2 clinical trial of an investigational therapy being developed for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, or DIPG. The rare brainstem tumor primarily affects children ages 5 to 10 and has few treatment options.

The financing was led by an undisclosed private family fund and foundation, with participation from BrainChild Bio’s initial investor, Seattle Children’s, and new investor WRF Capital.

BrainChild Bio is building on CAR T cell technology developed at Seattle Children’s and licensed exclusively to the company in 2023. The approach involves genetically engineering a patient’s own T cells to recognize and attack cancer cells.

The company says its new therapy has now entered its ILLUMINATE Phase 2 study, designed as a registration-stage trial that could eventually support an application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Advertisement

DIPG presents a particularly difficult challenge for cancer researchers because the tumors grow in the brainstem, an area critical to basic functions, and the blood-brain barrier can limit the ability of treatments to reach the tumor.

BrainChild Bio’s approach delivers the CAR T cells directly into cerebrospinal fluid through an implanted catheter, allowing the cells to reach the tumor locally and potentially be administered repeatedly.

About 300 children in the U.S. are diagnosed with DIPG each year, a devastating brain tumor with no cure and few treatment options. Radiation is the current standard of care, but children diagnosed with DIPG have a median overall survival of only about 11 months.

BrainChild Bio also plans to use proceeds from the new financing to advance a CAR T therapy designed to target three different cancer markers, toward initial clinical testing in glioblastoma.

Advertisement

The company was founded by Michael Jensen, who previously helped develop the underlying work at Seattle Children’s and was a co-founder of Umoja Biopharma and Juno Therapeutics. The CEO is Steven Brugger, who most recently served as founder and CEO of Affinivax, a biotech company which was acquired by GSK for $3.3 billion in 2022. 

“This financing enables us to chart our path forward to serve the children and families afflicted with devastating brain tumors and represents a new paradigm for treating CNS brain tumors in children and adults,” Jensen said in a statement. “Our team at BrainChild Bio is steadfast in its commitment to harness CAR T cell technology in CNS tumors and we are uniquely positioned to do so.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Disembodied fruit fly brain joins the crypto speculation swarm

Published

on

OFFBEAT

Coinbase engineer gives simulated insect $100 and lets its neurons make the trades

If you want to understand how 2026 is going, in March The Register reported that scientists had connected a simulated fruit fly brain to a virtual body and let it wander around a virtual world. Now another simulated fly nervous system is trading crypto.

Advertisement

Behold Stonkfly, the brainchild of Coinbase software engineer Alex Wormuth. His X post boasted: “I gave the fly brain $100 to trade bitcoin. Dopamine neurons are stimulated when the fly makes profit. Neuron activity controls buy/sell decisions and makes trades on coinbase. Will the fly get rich?”

Well, all we can say is Alex should question his life choices. But really, more stupid things have happened this year, like the US president suggesting he could bring in the military to correct a misbehaving bond market.

Keen readers will recall that researchers at Eon Systems took several preexisting components: a fruit fly brain scan, a tool for modeling neurons, a model of some of the fly’s muscles and body, and a very simple virtual environment. After connecting them, the team claimed that the result displayed some of the behavior of a real insect.

Stonkfly is different. It uses a model of a male fly’s brain and ventral nerve cord, rather than the female brain scan used in the earlier experiment. It has no body, and engineered interfaces feed it market information and translate neural activity into trading decisions.

Advertisement

The explanation on GitHub – it is an open source project – makes clear that the model uses engineered reinforcement signals, not modeled pain receptors, while synaptic changes “do not establish that it learns to trade profitably.”

The underlying network is substantial, comprising 166,700 nodes, 25,582,938 directed connections, and 124,177,617 synaptic contacts.


Stonkfly in action

The project documentation nonetheless sets out criteria for what would qualify as successful learning, along with some careful caveats. “Compare to cash and simple exposure baselines as well: rising crypto prices alone can make any buyer look skilled,” the documentation says.

“No profitable learning, strategy improvement, biological replication, or live-funded performance has been demonstrated by this repository’s tests,” it adds.

Advertisement

We call on Wormuth not to be so modest. Before the year is out, we expect Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh to be replaced by a disembodied virtual insect brain. It’s not even the end of September, after all. ®

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Hideo Kojima to part ways with Sony, will bring his new gaming projects to Xbox

Published

on

Metal Gear Breakup: Hideo Kojima’s new game is still years away, but fans are eagerly awaiting the action-espionage blockbuster the Japanese designer is working on. Most likely, the game will not be a PlayStation exclusive after the Tokyo-based company decided to end its partnership with Kojima and stop funding his projects.

Hideo Kojima recently announced that his upcoming games have found a new home. The Japanese designer and auteur, together with his company, Kojima Productions, will partner with Microsoft and Xbox to develop and publish Physint, OD, and the other projects announced last year.

Kojima confirmed that Sony was going to cancel Physint, which is intended to serve as a spiritual successor to the legendary Metal Gear franchise. However, Physint is a project that both Kojima and his company were determined to keep alive. The team spent the past three months looking for a new business partner, which it has now found through a deal announced on Kojima’s official social channels.

Kojima Productions and Microsoft apparently share a common vision for the future of video games, so Kojima will now use Microsoft’s money to keep Physint, OD, and his other projects alive until release. Physint is poised to be a new genre-defining action-espionage title worthy of the Metal Gear lineage, Kojima confirmed.

Advertisement

While the designer announced the new partnership with Xbox, PlayStation confirmed the “difficult decision” to end its partnership with Kojima Productions. Sony is still looking to maintain a “strong” relationship with the Japanese studio, although it no longer wants to spend money funding its expensive gaming projects while they remain years away from release.

According to people familiar with the matter, Sony had indeed decided to pull the plug on the collaboration as a pure business move. The studio’s executives are now concerned that Physint will go significantly over budget, fail to generate sufficient returns, and cease to be a prized PlayStation exclusive after a brief period of time.

The executives were apparently unimpressed with the market performance of Kojima’s previous games, Death Stranding and Death Stranding 2: On the Beach. The titles did not meet Sony’s internal revenue expectations, the sources said, and were later ported to other platforms by Kojima Productions. Official sales data say that Death Stranding has reached more than 20 million players worldwide, while the 2025 sequel sold more than two million copies after coming to PC earlier this year.

The Death Stranding games were not exactly a business failure, but Sony is having a pretty rough time right now and wants even more money to push its questionable live-service strategy. The company recently decided that exclusivity is a successful business strategy, although former executives are not in agreement with this new direction.

Advertisement

Of course, Xbox has its own business issues to deal with. The company’s strategy of turning everything into a cloud service is failing spectacularly before the world’s eyes, and new CEO Asha Sharma is definitely using the hatchet rather than the chisel to try to steer the sinking ship back on course.

After Kojima’s announcement, Xbox said that the team was “honored” to partner with the legendary studio behind Metal Gear and Death Stranding. The Metal Gear saga helped Sony establish PlayStation as a major force in the modern gaming industry at the turn of the millennium, but Kojima parted ways with the brand’s owner, Konami Group, in 2015.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Musk’s Robotaxis Under Investigation For Dodging Safety Standards

Published

on

from the who-needs-oversight? dept

It says nothing good about America how easily Elon Musk convinced the press and public he was a supergenius engineer who could cobble together complicated rocket machinery wearing coveralls in his backyard shed.

Hindsight continues to illustrate how Elon Musk’s real skill sets are opportunism, taking singular credit for the innovations of real engineers, the manipulation of a very broken media, and taking legal, regulatory, environmental, labor, and consumer protection “shortcuts” wherever possible.

Enter the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which is investigating Musk’s automated-taxi Cybercab deployments in Austin for violating public safety guidelines.

The Trump NHTSA is updating existing Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) to help companies speed toward automated cars and taxis. But until then our previous (already fairly lax) standards still apply. This being America, companies self-certify whether they’re adhering to the rules in order to get a two-year exemption (Amazon’s Zoox got approval last month).

Advertisement

Tesla, owned by a man who doesn’t believe in coherent governance, is facing a new NHTSA investigation for simply refusing to participate in the process

“Ann Carlson, a former acting NHTSA administrator who is now a professor of environmental law at UCLA, says the investigation is likely “an indication that NHTSA is super frustrated with Tesla.” The agency made clear through the Zoox case that it expects driverless vehicle developers to go through the exemption process. “For Tesla to slap them in the face and ignore that—that is gobsmacking,” she says.”

It’s not really all that gobsmacking for a company run by a man who has been extremely proud about his clumsy role in fatally dismantling U.S. federal government functionality — particularly when it pertains to corporate oversight and public safety. This is always who he was. He has a twelve-year old libertarian boy’s understanding of what government does and why it’s necessary.

Of course, this isn’t the first time NHTSA has promised accountability and then delivered the policy equivalent of a wet farting sound. The agency announced it opened an inquiry last year into Musk robotaxis clearly failing to adhere to traffic laws and making constant navigation mistakes.

The NHTSA is also purportedly investigating all the people killed by “full self driving” (FSD) technology and Tesla’s very intentional misrepresentation of what the tech is capable of. That inquiry also appears to be perpetually stuck in neutral, like most of the legal and regulatory inquiries into the country’s richest fake engineer.

Advertisement

Filed Under: cars, cybercab, full self driving, nhtsa, public safety, robotaxis, vehicles

Companies: tesla

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Apple iPhone Duo Is a $1,999 Foldable With a 7.6 Inch Display Built for Movies and Multitasking

Published

on

Apple has finally folded, literally, with the introduction of the iPhone Duo, its first foldable smartphone and arguably the most significant change to the physical design of the iPhone since the original arrived in 2007.

Starting at $1,999, the iPhone Duo opens to reveal a 7.6-inch Super Retina XDR display while retaining a 5.4-inch outer screen for conventional one-handed use. Apple is positioning the Duo as a single device for communication, movies, gaming, photography and serious multitasking, rather than merely an iPhone with an expensive party trick in the middle.

It also arrives very late to a category Samsung, Google and several Chinese manufacturers have spent years refining. That means Apple does not get a participation trophy merely for discovering the hinge, and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 and Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold already offer mature alternatives running on Android.

apple-iphone-duo-display-sizes-260909

Two Screens but a Very Different iPhone

Closed, the iPhone Duo uses a 5.4-inch Super Retina XDR display that Apple says provides 90 percent of the screen area of the iPhone 18 Pro. Open it and the internal 7.6-inch Super Retina XDR display becomes the largest screen Apple has ever installed in an iPhone.

Advertisement

Both displays use the same aspect ratio, allowing content to scale proportionally as the Duo is opened or closed. Apple also includes ProMotion, Always On functionality and up to 3,000 nits of peak outdoor brightness on both displays.

The internal panel receives a nano-texture treatment designed to reduce glare and reflections while making the crease less noticeable. Apple also hides the inner FaceTime camera beneath the display when it is not being used, which is particularly relevant when the entire point of opening the device is to create a more immersive canvas.

Later this year, iPhone Duo will also support the USB-C Apple Pencil on either display, giving Apple an interesting advantage over Samsung’s regular Galaxy Z Fold8, which does not support the S Pen. The Duo will never replace an iPad Pro for serious creative work, but the ability to sketch, annotate or take notes on something that folds back into a pocket gives the design more purpose than simply making TikTok larger.

iphone-duo-finish-star-white-side

Is the iPhone Duo Better for Movies and TV?

For eCoustics readers, the iPhone Duo becomes especially interesting as a portable video device. Its 7.6-inch Super Retina XDR display provides considerably more room for movies, TV, sports, YouTube, and gaming than the 6.3-inch iPhone 18 Pro while still folding down into something that fits in a pocket.

Netflix has already optimized its app for the Duo, allowing users to browse Clips on the 5.4-inch outer display before opening the phone for playback on the larger screen. That suggests Apple and major streaming services see the Duo as a distinct viewing platform rather than simply an oversized iPhone.

Advertisement

The obvious alternative is the $599 iPad mini, whose 8.3-inch display is larger and dramatically less expensive. For someone primarily interested in watching Netflix, Apple TV+, or downloaded movies, the iPad mini remains the better value; the Duo’s advantage is eliminating the need to carry a second device.

Apple rates the Duo for up to 31 hours of video playback using the inner display and 44 hours on the outer screen. Add the optional Duo Folio with its integrated kickstand, and the Duo starts to make considerable sense for frequent travelers who want one device for communication and entertainment—provided they can stomach the $1,999 starting price.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

For private listening, the iPhone Duo should also fit naturally into Apple’s existing headphone ecosystem, including AirPods 5, AirPods Pro 3, and AirPods Max 2. That gives travelers several Apple-integrated options for watching Netflix, Apple TV+, and downloaded movies without relying on the Duo’s built-in speakers, while keeping pairing, device switching, and playback controls inside the same ecosystem.

Advertisement
apple-iphone-duo-case-sand-260909
iPhone Duo with Case

Built to Survive Folding

Foldable durability remains one of the category’s biggest concerns, and Apple has clearly spent considerable engineering effort trying to address it.

The iPhone Duo uses a Grade 5 titanium enclosure with a precision hinge containing more than 100 components. Ceramic Shield protects the rear, while Ceramic Shield 2 covers the outer display and offers what Apple claims is three times better scratch resistance than the previous generation.

The folding screen uses a custom polymer nano-textured cover layer, high-strength glass above and below the display panel, custom adhesives that allow the layers to move as the device folds and a titanium reinforcement plate underneath.

Apple has also achieved an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. That puts it alongside Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold in terms of the published IP classification and ahead of Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold8, which carries an IP48 rating.

Advertisement

How all of that survives three years of people opening the phone 75 times a day remains something no launch event can answer.

apple-iphone-duo-siri-aI-app-260909

A20 Pro Comes Along for the Ride

Apple did not give the Duo a reduced-performance processor simply because it bends.

The A20 Pro is the same 2-nanometer chip used in the iPhone 18 Pro models, with a 6-core CPU, 7-core GPU and Dual 16-core Neural Engine. Apple says the CPU is up to 20 percent faster than A19 Pro, while the GPU is up to 40 percent faster and more efficient.

A custom vapor chamber works with a redesigned chip package to manage heat across the unusual chassis, and Apple claims up to 35 percent better sustained performance than iPhone 17 Pro. A separate display engine drives both screens simultaneously and handles transitions between them.

Advertisement

That additional performance matters more on Duo than it does on a conventional iPhone because Apple is introducing true Split View multitasking on an iPhone for the first time.

Users can run two apps side by side, open two instances of the same application, save application pairs and keep Siri AI visible beside another app. Netflix, Zoom and Slack are among the third-party applications already adapted for the larger folding display.

iphone-duo-finish-nightsky-back

Cameras Take Advantage of the Fold

The iPhone Duo uses a 48MP Fusion Main camera with an optical-quality 2x Telephoto mode and a 48MP Fusion Ultra Wide camera, the latter shared with the iPhone 18 Pro lineup.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement

The folding design creates several camera features that conventional iPhones cannot duplicate. Users can photograph themselves using the higher-quality rear cameras while framing the shot on the outer display, while Duo Preview lets the subject see the live composition from the opposite side of the device.

Smart Take uses on-device AI to recognize when subjects are ready and automatically capture an image, while Kid Cue displays Peanuts animations on the outer screen to encourage children to look toward the camera. Duo FaceTime can also use the outer display to include another person sitting beside the owner in a call.

The Main camera supports 4K video at up to 120 fps in Dolby Vision, along with Cinematic effects applied after capture at up to 60 fps. Apple has also upgraded Audio Mix so that voices and music can be separated more effectively from unwanted background sound.

Battery Life and Connectivity

Folding the phone created another engineering challenge because there is no single large internal cavity available for the battery.

Advertisement

Apple uses a dual-battery architecture, placing one high-energy battery on each side of the device and managing them together through software. Apple rates the Duo for up to 31 hours of video playback on the inner display, 44 hours using the outer display or up to 24 hours of mixed use when both are used equally.

Wired charging can reach 50 percent in around 20 minutes when using suitable USB-C Power Delivery hardware. MagSafe or Qi2 wireless charging can reach 50 percent in around 30 minutes under Apple’s specified test conditions.

The Apple-designed N1 wireless chip provides Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6 and Thread, while Apple’s C2 modem handles cellular connectivity and adds mmWave support in the United States.

The iPhone Duo is also eSIM-only worldwide, rather than merely in selected markets. Apple says more than 500 carriers support eSIM globally.

Advertisement

The Two Competitors That Matter

Apple is entering an established foldable market where two Android-powered products have been battling for market share.

iPhone Duo Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Starting Price $1,999 $1,899 $1,899
Outer Display 5.4 inches 5.5 inches 6.5 inches
Inner Display 7.6 inches 7.6 inches 8 inches
Screen Brightness 3,000 nits 3,000 nits 3,600 nits
Processor Apple A20 Pro Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy Google Tensor G6
Rear Cameras 48MP
48MP
50MP
50MP
48MP
10.5MP
10.8MP
Inner Camera 12MP 10MP 10MP
Storage 256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Water and Dust Rating IP68 IP48 IP68
Stylus Support Apple Pencil USB-C later in 2026
Platform iOS 27.1 Android / One UI Android

Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold8  is nearly the same size as Duo with 7.6-inch inner screen and a 5.5-inch outer panel, while also offering an anti-reflective main display with up to 3,000 nits brightness.

Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold is larger, measuring 6.5 inches externally and 8 inches internally. It also carries an IP68 rating, supports Qi2 magnetic charging and uses Google’s Tensor G6 processor with deep Gemini integration.

The iPhone Duo therefore does not win on screen size or price. Apple’s differentiators are its integration with iOS and the broader Apple ecosystem, the A20 Pro platform, Apple Pencil support, up to 2TB of storage, the nano-textured inner display and a collection of software and camera experiences built specifically around the two-screen design.

Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Whether those advantages justify another $100 to $200 over two highly developed competitors is the $1,999 question.

iPhone Feaures Compared

Feature iPhone Duo iPhone 18 Pro iPhone Air iPhone 17 iPhone 17e
Starting price $1,999 $1,199 $1,099 $899 $699
Storage 256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB 256GB, 512GB
Colors Star White, Night Sky Burgundy, Glacier, Silver, Black Sky Blue, Light Gold, Cloud White, Space Black Lavender, Sage, Mist Blue, White, Black Soft Pink, White, Black
Display size 7.6″ inner display;
5.4″ outer display
6.3″ 6.5″ 6.3″ 6.1″
Display type Super Retina XDR folding display with nano-texture Super Retina XDR Super Retina XDR Super Retina XDR Super Retina XDR
Nano-texture display Yes
ProMotion Yes Yes Yes Yes
Always-On display Yes Yes Yes Yes
Dynamic Island Yes Yes Yes Yes
Foldable design Yes
Case materials Titanium frame and hinge cover Aluminum unibody Titanium frame Aluminum frame Aluminum frame
Front protection Ceramic Shield 2 Ceramic Shield 2 Ceramic Shield 2 Ceramic Shield 2 Ceramic Shield 2
Back protection Ceramic Shield back
Water resistance Up to 6 meters for 30 minutes Up to 6 meters for 30 minutes Up to 6 meters for 30 minutes Up to 6 meters for 30 minutes Up to 6 meters for 30 minutes
Action button Yes Yes Yes Yes
Camera Control Yes Yes Yes Yes
Chip A20 Pro A20 Pro A19 Pro A19 A19
CPU 6-core 6-core 6-core 6-core 6-core
GPU 7-core with Neural Accelerators 7-core with Neural Accelerators 5-core with Neural Accelerators 5-core with Neural Accelerators 4-core with Neural Accelerators
Neural Engine Dual 16-core Dual 16-core 16-core 16-core 16-core
Ray tracing Hardware-accelerated Hardware-accelerated Hardware-accelerated Hardware-accelerated Hardware-accelerated
Rear camera system 48MP Dual Fusion 48MP Pro Fusion 48MP Fusion 48MP Dual Fusion 48MP Fusion
Main rear camera 48MP Fusion Main 48MP Fusion Main with variable aperture 48MP Fusion Main 48MP Fusion Main 48MP Fusion Main
Ultra Wide camera Yes Yes Yes
Telephoto camera Yes
Pro camera controls Yes
Super-high-resolution photos 24MP and 48MP 24MP and 48MP 24MP and 48MP 24MP and 48MP 24MP and 48MP
Smart Take Yes
Duo Preview Yes
Photographic Styles Version 3 Version 3 Version 3 Version 2 Version 2
Apple Reference Image Yes
Macro photography Yes Yes Yes
Front camera resolution 12MP 18MP 18MP 18MP 12MP
Front-camera controls Tap to zoom and rotate Tap to zoom and rotate Tap to zoom and rotate Tap to zoom and rotate Tap to zoom
Center Stage for photos 12MP 18MP 18MP 18MP 12MP
Center Stage for video calls Yes Yes Yes Yes
Ultra-stabilized video Yes Yes Yes Yes
Dual Capture Yes Yes Yes Yes
Under-display FaceTime camera Yes
Optical zoom options 0.5x, 1x, 2x 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x, 8x 1x, 2x 0.5x, 1x, 2x 1x, 2x
Variable aperture Yes
Dolby Vision video Up to 4K at 120 fps Up to 4K at 120 fps Up to 4K at 60 fps Up to 4K at 60 fps Up to 4K at 60 fps
Smart focus tracking Yes Yes Yes
Cinematic mode effects Yes Yes Yes
Improved low-light video Yes Yes Yes
Next-generation portraits Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Maximum video playback Up to 44 hours using outer display; up to 31 hours using inner display Up to 36 hours Up to 27 hours Up to 30 hours Up to 26 hours
Apple Intelligence Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Siri AI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
USB-C Apple Pencil Yes
apple-iphone-duo-star-white-rear-angle-open

The Bottom Line

The iPhone Duo is not revolutionary because Apple invented the foldable phone. Samsung and Google have already done years of unpaid beta testing on that particular idea, and both currently offer excellent foldables for less money.

What Apple has created is arguably its first iPhone that can credibly replace some of the reasons people carry an iPad. A 7.6-inch ProMotion display, nano-texture surface, Netflix optimization, Split View, Apple Pencil support and up to 31 hours of video playback make the Duo far more compelling for movies, television, gaming and travel than the 6.3-inch iPhone 18 Pro.

An iPad mini still provides a larger 8.3-inch display for only $599, and anyone primarily interested in watching movies should keep that rather enormous price difference in mind. The Duo makes sense for the user who wants one premium device that can function as a conventional phone until the moment more screen space becomes useful.

Advertisement

Apple’s strongest argument is not size or value. It is whether the combination of A20 Pro, iOS 27, Apple Intelligence, Apple Pencil, Apple’s camera ecosystem and seamless integration with the devices and services millions of customers already own can make the Duo feel more cohesive than foldables that have been doing this longer.

At $1,999, it had better.

apple-iphone-duo-folio-taupe-260909

Price & Availability

Pre-orders start Oct. 16th 5am PT at Apple or Best Buy, which is one week before iPhone Duo becomes available in the U.S. on October 23, 2026 at the following price points in either Star White and Night Sky (dark blue).

  • 256GB – $1,999 at Best Buy
  • 512GB – $2,199
  • 1TB – $2,599
  • 2TB – $3,199

Apple’s iPhone Duo Case costs $79, while the Duo Folio with integrated kickstand costs $129.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025