Connect with us

Tech

The Pros And Cons Of Using Wireless Android Auto

Published

on

Ditching the cable can make life easier, but it does come with tradeoffs.

Wireless Android Auto is easily one of the most convenient things for drivers, especially if they rely on their phones for navigation, music and hands-free communication. As with any wireless technology, the appeal is obvious because there are no cables involved, there’s no fumbling around to plug the cable into the phone’s port and the connection establishes itself automatically whenever you start the car. 

The shift from wired to wireless isn’t without tradeoffs. Battery drain increases noticeably, heat buildup becomes a genuine concern on longer drives and the connection quality depends on your phone’s hardware and your vehicle’s capabilities. Compatibility requirements add another layer to the issue, especially if you have an older model. 

Whether Android Auto is the right choice depends less on the feature itself and more on how you drive, what you’re driving and what you’re asking your phone to do while you’re behind the wheel. 

Advertisement

Wireless Android Auto, whether present in your car natively or with the help of an adapter, delivers on the promise of making your life easier most of the time. The automatic pairing works, the interface is responsive and the interior feels tidier without a cable running across the console. The real picture, however, is more nuanced.

How does Wireless Android Auto actually work?

Wireless Android Auto actually uses Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. When you start your vehicle, Bluetooth handles the initial handshake between phone and car, authenticating your smartphone and establishing credentials. Once that happens, the connection migrates to a Wi-Fi Direct network, which carries the data-heavy part: Maps, audio, touch input and voice commands.

Advertisement

Both connections run simultaneously for the entire drive, with Bluetooth taking on hands-free calling and Wi-Fi handling the rest of the data load. Disabling either one will drop the connection. The phone needs to run on Android 11 or later and come with 5GHz Wi-Fi Direct support. Newer cars support it natively, while older vehicles may require an Android Auto wireless adapter plugged into the existing USB port. Sometimes, you might need to toggle the wireless functionality on in the Android Auto developer menu if it hasn’t been enabled already.

The pros of Wireless Android Auto

The list of pros is topped by the obvious fact that no cables are needed for the job. After a one-time Bluetooth pairing, your phone connects automatically every time. So, when you get in the car, you won’t have to look around for the cable, dig out your phone from whatever pocket or bag you have, locate the port and plug the cable in. You can be on your way a lot faster, knowing your maps will load up in no time and your Spotify playlist can start playing without you having to do anything.

If there are multiple drivers using the same car, Wireless Android Auto remembers all of the paired phones. When several devices attempt to connect, whoever’s not driving can simply turn off Bluetooth because, as anyone who’s watched ‘Supernatural’ knows, the “driver picks the music, shotgun shuts his cakehole.”

Advertisement

You will also get to enjoy a much cleaner center console, as you’ll no longer need to worry about a cable looping around the gear shift or catching in the seat as you slide it back. Plus, it’ll free up an extra port to charge devices like your earbuds or smartwatch. Passengers can also charge their own devices if need be.

The cons of Wireless Android Auto

Battery drain can be a real problem. Sure, not having to worry about cables and delaying your drive by a minute is great, but maintaining a continuous Wi-Fi connection alongside Bluetooth and active GPS weighs heavily on your phone. With everything turned on, your phone’s battery drops about 10 to 15 percent every hour of your drive.

Heavy users will notice that their phone quickly heats up when Wireless Android Auto is in use, especially when also using GPS for navigation. Add in the rising temperatures inside a car during the summer and you risk your phone reaching the point where it shuts down to prevent hardware damage. It’s especially noticeable on older phone models, with sluggish map rendering and random music breaks becoming a headache.

Advertisement

When comparing wired and wireless Android Auto setups, wired connections offer reliability and performance. A physical USB cable ensures a stable link, minimal latency for your media and a steady charge for the phone. Wireless Android Auto has convenience on its side, but these setups can experience slight delays in responsiveness or random disconnects.

Is Wireless Android Auto worth it?

For most daily commuters, wireless Android Auto is most definitely worth it. From the automatic connection to the cable-free experience, your driving experience is improved immediately. On longer drives, however, especially as navigation is running the whole time, heat buildup and battery drainage make switching to a wired connection a good alternative. Wired remains the more battery-efficient option, while wireless is the more convenient choice. Ultimately, it depends where you’re going and how long your drive is going to be.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

John Coltrane’s ‘Impressions’ Verve Acoustic Sounds Vinyl Review: Better Than an Original?

Published

on

John Coltrane’s 1963 Impulse! Records release Impressions is sometimes overlooked by jazz newcomers and even established fans of the artist. But it represents an important stepping stone between his work on albums such as Giant Steps, My Favorite Things, and Africa/Brass, which I reviewed quite recently, and the final run-up to his January 1965 masterpiece, A Love Supreme.

Universal’s Verve / Acoustic Sounds Series has revived this excellent album and put it back within reach of the public with a fine new reissue. Again driven by Chad Kassem (of Analogue Productions fame), the lacquers for this new pressing of Impressions were crafted by Matthew Lutthans at The Mastering Lab.

The 180-gram vinyl discs were pressed at Quality Record Pressing (QRP), and each comes housed in an audiophile-grade, plastic-lined inner sleeve. The beautiful gatefold cover is manufactured to recreate the exacting look and feel of original editions, with glossy laminated cover artwork and the period-accurate, 1963-era orange starburst style Impulse Records label design (comparison of 1963 original to reissue below).

coltrane-impressions-label-comparison

A mix of studio and live recordings, the fidelity changes a bit on this one, as it features two tracks from the same sessions that gave us Coltrane’s wonderful Live At The Village Vanguard albums. It still kind of blows my mind that, at a time when much of the pre-Beatles world was listening to often insipid pop fluff, the strong jazz underground could still allow an artist like Coltrane to thrive, creating such inspired music.

The music on Impressions, and the track “India” in particular, was definitely an influence on many artists. For example, The Byrds’ co-founder Roger McGuinn has frequently gone on record mentioning this album, as well as Africa / Brass, as important influences on the evolution of their expansive sound, particularly on tracks like “Eight Miles High.”

Advertisement
coltrane-impressions-gatefold

Unlike my last review of Africa / Brass, where I only had a 3rd or 4th pressing to compare it to, in this instance I actually own a quite nice condition 1st pressing. Short of being able to conduct a true A/B test, I made some quick back-to-back reality checks between both versions, and the new Acoustic Sounds reissue clearly bests my original.

It is less compressed and fuller sounding, with Reggie Workman and Jimmy Garrison’s twin double basses feeling far more present. When Eric Dolphy’s bass clarinet solo enters, the impact is stunning, with a rich presence at which the original only hints.

So now I am in a pickle: I love owning original pressings, but this presentation is so well crafted that I may well purge my OG. First-world problems for sure, I know.

You can get Impressions on Amazon for a very reasonable $38.98, which is a great deal, especially when you consider buying a vintage pressing on the collector’s market.

For example, at the time of this writing, a 1963 original stereo pressing in, at best, VG+ condition on Discogs would cost you at least $75. A more pristine copy, like the one I have, would cost much more. The choice is yours, but if you are simply looking for great sound and an authentic presentation of Impressions, this new reissue is a winner.

Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Our Ratings

★★★★★★★★★★ Music

★★★★★★★★★★ Sound

★★★★★★★★★★ Packaging

Advertisement

Where to Buy


Mark Smotroff is a deep music enthusiast / collector who has also worked in entertainment oriented marketing communications for decades supporting the likes of DTS, Sega and many others. He reviews vinyl for Analog Planet and has written for Audiophile Review, Sound+Vision, Mix, EQ, etc.  You can learn more about him at LinkedIn.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Where a Massive Solar Storm Could Take Down the US Power Grid for Millions

Published

on

A new study published Friday in AGU Advances “depicts the most advanced picture yet of how a rare but massive solar storm could affect some US industries and electric systems more than others,” reports CNN.

“During a 250-year solar storm, the East Coast would have widespread potential for grid failure.”

Researchers modeled what a Carrington Event — a 1-in-150-year geomagnetic storm or even rarer — could mean for the modern day. They estimate the US economy would lose about $1.5 billion to $2 billion per day from direct and indirect costs, as millions of people face power outages. The findings show the most vulnerable areas are the Northeast and the Northern Plains, especially locations at higher latitudes.
No one knows when the next big storm will hit. While the most severe geomagnetic storms are labeled as once-in-a-century or rarer, these events don’t follow a fixed schedule. “That timing only averages out on very long timescales,” said Anna Kelbert, a geophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, who was not involved in the study but previously studied solar storm effects on power grids. “The event can occur at any time, as soon as a week from now, or centuries later….” [Shawn Dahl, service coordinator at the Space Weather Prediction Center operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado], said the sun is now coming down from a period of heightened activity, which is also when some of the biggest storms to hit Earth have occurred in the past. “We still need a lot of work to be ready….”

“We haven’t really seen events like this size in the modern era, where we’ve had all of this high technology and we’ve had the power grid of this size,” said Ed Oughton, researcher at George Mason University and lead author of the new study… Because the US grid’s actual structure is proprietary for security reasons, the team used engineering models to create various network and transformer setups including the 10,464 substations and 16,256 transmission lines found across the country… The grid structure also contributes to higher risk in some areas. For instance, the eastern US is linked together in a single grid interconnection. A voltage issue in Maine, if not isolated early, could cascade through the grid to Washington, DC. The West works similarly, whereas the Texas interconnection operates mostly within the state…

Advertisement

Power is restored over time depending on any alternative electrical paths that could bypass the substation or availabilities of spare transformers, for instance. “This nationwide analysis shows that we are currently ill-prepared to face a major magnetic storm, and that the societal impacts would be catastrophic,” Kelbert said.

“The study estimates power disruptions for 5.1 million people and 135,000 businesses,” according to the article, and “The outages could last from hours to days to weeks depending on the damage and resources available to get back online, said Oughton.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Three hikers trusted Gemini to plan a hike and had to be rescued the next day

Published

on

AI chatbots can help plan a vacation or suggest what to pack. But there are situations where advice from someone who actually knows what they are doing is the safer choice.

As reported by the Chicago Tribune, three novice hikers from Roseville, California, had to be rescued from Mount Shasta after becoming stranded overnight. According to the Siskiyou County Sheriff’s Office, they had used Google Gemini to help plan the climb. The sheriff’s office said Gemini advised the group to carry far less food and water than they needed.

An eight-hour hike turned into an overnight rescue

The group started toward the summit at around 3 a.m. on Sunday. Hikers are advised to turn around if they have not reached the summit by noon, but the three continued and eventually reached the top at around 7 p.m.

Things went wrong on the descent. They lost their route in the dark and ended up in Mud Creek Canyon instead of staying on the Clear Creek Route. One of the hikers had also injured his knee, forcing the group to spend the night in a steep drainage before rescuers reached them the following morning.

Advertisement

The sheriff’s office advised hikers to carry multiple methods of navigation, including an offline option, and recommended calling the local U.S. Forest Service ranger station before attempting the climb. It also specifically warned people not to rely solely on AI for trip planning.

AI can give advice, but it cannot replace experience

Similar problems have surfaced when people turned to AI for legal and medical advice. We previously covered a lawyer who used ChatGPT for legal research, only to discover that the cases it cited did not exist. He even asked ChatGPT to confirm they were real, and the chatbot said they were. A study testing ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek also found that roughly half of their answers to medical questions were flawed or incomplete, while some included fabricated references.

Chatbots have their uses, but getting a plausible answer is not good enough when a mistake could put someone’s health, safety, or livelihood at risk. Advice from a professional or experienced expert should come first. At the very least, AI-generated information should be checked against reliable sources before anyone acts on it.

Even the chatbots themselves tell users not to take everything they say at face value. Gemini carries the warning, “Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.” Cases like this are a good reminder of why that warning is there.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

How To Use Your MacBook’s Built-In Backup Tool Instead Of Paying For Cloud Storage

Published

on

Apple’s Time Machine tool removes the need to store everything online.

Modern cloud storage, the way we know it, has been around commercially since 2006, when Amazon launched its Simple Storage Service (S3). In the following years, personal cloud storage rose in popularity thanks to services like Dropbox and Google Drive. Back then, the idea of being able to access a few of your most important files on any computer felt remarkably convenient. Nowadays, cloud storage has become more of a necessity, often requiring a subscription if you want to store more than a few gigabytes.

Apple’s iCloud notoriously only offers 5GB of storage for free. In addition to backing up your photos and videos, you’re somehow supposed to accommodate device backups from your iPhone, iPad and Mac. Although the 50GB monthly subscription may not seem costly at $0.99, that amount of cloud storage isn’t really sufficient if you also want to transfer large amounts of files stored on your computer. 

If you’re searching for a backup option and don’t necessarily need your computer’s files accessible from the cloud, you don’t need to look beyond what macOS has to offer.

Advertisement

Time Machine is a utility that’s been available on the Mac for years. It lets you create a local backup of your apps, photos, videos and other documents and transfer them to an external hard drive or SSD for safekeeping. It’s normal for the first run to take a while, but subsequent snapshots will be much quicker and can be scheduled to run hourly, daily or weekly.

Setting up a drive for Time Machine

Time Machine doesn’t actually need an external drive to work — it can back up your files to your Mac’s internal drive if you partition it. Using an external drive, though, is the more secure option. Although portable SSDs offer substantially faster file transfers, an older drive you’ve decided to make do with is perfectly fine for the job. In fact, they can be a better fit for long term archival storage since SSDs can lose data if they remain unpowered for a long period.

For Time Machine backups, Apple recommends using an external drive with at least two times the capacity of your Mac’s internal drive. You’ll also need to format it using the APFS file system, which prevents you from natively using the drive with Windows. Even on Mac, the drive will need to be partitioned if you want to store other files besides your computer’s backups, though it’s not recommended that you do.

Advertisement

The first step requires plugging a drive into your Mac. Launch System Settings and navigate to General > Time Machine. Click on Add Backup Disk, select your external drive and click on Set Up Disk. You can choose to encrypt the drive with a password, which you’ll need to keep handy if you choose to restore a snapshot in the future. Click on Done

If your external drive needs to be formatted to APFS, a prompt will appear that can do so with one click. Once this is complete, your drive will be set up to accommodate Time Machine transfers.

Advertisement

How Time Machine works

Shortly after you add a drive formatted for Time Machine, your first backup will begin automatically. Depending on how many files you’ve got stored on your Mac, this process can take between a few minutes to over an hour to complete. 

When the external drive is unplugged, snapshots are stored locally on your Mac. By default, backups happen on the hour, but you can navigate to System Settings > General > Time Machine > Options and change the backup frequency to daily or weekly. Here, you can also add folders or volumes you wish to exclude from the process.

When you need to restore a file, you can access your Time Machine drive by opening Finder and looking at the Locations section on the left. Click on Enter Time Machine, choose a backup, find your file and click Restore.

Advertisement

How far back can you go with Time Machine?

What’s even more impressive about Time Machine is that it stores different versions of the same file as it changes over time. This means you can browse through earlier copies and find the version you’re looking for. When set to back up every hour, Time Machine lets you access hourly restore points from the past 24 hours. Daily backups will span the past month and weekly snapshots will offer points from the months before that.

For instance, if you were working on a document, making changes every couple of hours, you can go back and restore a version from earlier in the day. If a couple of days have gone by, you can still restore the file but you’ll have to locate it within a daily or weekly restore point instead. This is a pretty well thought out system that gives you plenty of options for recovery.

Eventually, though, your external drive will begin to fill up. When this happens, Time Machine will start dropping the oldest weekly backups to make room for new ones. 

Besides letting you to restore specific files through Finder, Time Machine lets you restore your entire Mac from a backup. This is particularly useful when an internal drive fails or you’re migrating to a new computer and wish to bring all your files, apps and settings with you.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Wayve and Uber steal a march on Waymo with paid self-driving London rides

Published

on

AI AND ML

15 Mustangs on the city streets, but the Nissan LEAF follow-up could dispense with the safety driver

Wayve and Uber have launched self-driving rides in London, but what’s more interesting is what is planned for the next few months and years.

Advertisement

As of today, the plan is for 15 electric Ford Mustangs, equipped with the Wayve AI driver, to roam the capital, picking up passengers with a safety driver on hand to keep an eye on things.

However, at a launch event on Thursday, Wayve showed off the follow-up to the Mustang: a Nissan LEAF, which will run the Wayve AI Driver using NVIDIA DRIVE Hyperion. This glimpse into the future was arguably more intriguing than today’s electric Mustang.

Unlike the Mustang, the LEAF’s self-driving equipment looked as though it might have been part of the car’s design, from a roof-mounted sensor pack that followed the roofline, through to sensors attached to the wings and bumpers.

A Wayve representative told us it had worked with Nissan on the integration. That said, the tech is relatively agnostic when it comes to platforms and sensor configurations.

Advertisement

Wayve was, however, a little less forthcoming at the launch event about the underlying technology changes between the Nissan-based prototype on show and the Mustang parked up in front of it. The hope is that the update will reach UK roads next year, although that depends on several factors, including technology and regulations. Right now, Uber stated, “The initial launch phase features supervised autonomous rides, meaning a trained and TfL licensed private hire driver is onboard to oversee the trip.”

So no San Francisco Waymo-esque rides with the driver’s seat spookily empty just yet. However, a Wayve representative told us the Nissan LEAF would eventually be capable of such a feat.

The rollout of the Mustang feels a little like a stunt to steal a march on competitors such as Waymo, which has also had vehicles rolling around the tricky streets and traffic of London. Waymo is presently in a testing phase, but Wayve and Uber are now taking paying passengers. Both services, however, must have a trained driver onboard, poised to intervene if the need arises.

Rear of a black Ford Mustang showing its badge and a test vehicle warning.

A Ford Mustang used in Wayve and Uber’s supervised self-driving trials.

The untried nature of the Wayve and Uber Mustang is evidenced by the words “TEST VEHICLE. KEEP A SAFE DISTANCE” printed on the rear of the car. Paying passengers are part of the AI Driver’s learning process, with lessons learned feeding into the next generation of autonomous vehicles, which might, or might not, still need that safety driver behind the wheel, just in case.

Advertisement

Wayve was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in London. It has trained its AI tech on the city’s roads since 2018. In 2024, Wayve partnered with Uber, which included an investment to deploy vehicles with Wayve’s technology in 12 markets worldwide, starting with London. The LEAF will first see action in Tokyo. ®

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

5 Of The Biggest Mistakes People Make When Using Android Auto

Published

on





The purpose of the Android Auto framework is to make it easier to connect your Android smartphone to your car and utilize its features through your onboard infotainment system. Compared to manually messing with your phone and car’s settings, it’s definitely a more streamlined approach, though as with any system meant to facilitate conversation between two devices, things can sometimes get a little lost in translation.

While the whole point of Android Auto is to handle all the minutiae of connecting your phone to your car for you, if you just leave the whole thing to manage itself, you could end up making a handful of different mistakes that would diminish the overall usefulness of the system. Not everyone is comfortable with these kinds of newer systems, and it’s normal to experience hiccups, but so long as you avoid these mistakes, your Android Auto experience should be substantially better, as well as more convenient for your particular needs.

Advertisement

Only connecting wirelessly

Depending on your vehicle, Android Auto allows you to connect your smartphone to your car in one of two ways: either with a regular USB cable, or via a local wireless signal. Modern convention would dictate the latter to be the optimal option; everything’s better when it’s wireless, after all, and it does mean you don’t need to take your phone out of your pocket. However, in contrast to that sentiment, Android Auto is actually a little better off with a wired connection.

Connecting wirelessly puts more of a strain on your phone’s resources, as it requires a constant battery-draining wireless connection to transfer data, and the connection may not always remain stable. On the other hand, plugging your phone in has the dual benefits of charging its battery and facilitating a steady connection, which can help reduce lag or dropouts. If you’re just taking a quick jaunt around the corner, wireless is okay, but if you’re driving around a lot and using your navigation apps, take the pressure off your phone and plug it in. Just remember to use a good USB cable from a reputable brand, as a bad cable can be even less reliable than wireless..

Advertisement

Unlocking your phone every time you want to use Android Auto

Another bit of conventional wisdom around smartphones is that, whenever you want to use them, you have to unlock them. This makes sense from a security perspective, but if you’re using Android Auto in your personal car, you don’t really need to worry as much about someone touching your phone and using your apps without your permission. It’s not like a stranger is going to swipe your phone while you’re in the middle of a drive, after all.

Given that, it’s not really efficient to have to unlock your phone every time you want to start up Android Auto and use your apps on the infotainment screen. Instead, go to your Android Auto settings, and under the Startup section, toggle on Start Android Auto while locked. When this option is on, you just have to connect your phone to your car without unlocking it first, and Android Auto can start while your phone stays locked, giving you access to your apps, maps, and music. The only time you might want to turn this option off is when you’re sharing your car with someone like a friend or family member, and only if you’re really worried about them touching your phone while you’re driving.

Advertisement

Not downloading offline maps

One of the most useful applications of Android Auto is providing quick access to your preferred navigation app like Google Maps, displaying your current heading on your infotainment screen, and providing directions through your car’s speakers. However, this useful feature has a single, potentially fatal flaw: it needs an active network connection for live map data. As long as you’re getting active map data, it’s constantly using your phone’s mobile data, and in the event you venture beyond a viable mobile data signal, you’ll pretty quickly find yourself dead in the water.

Luckily, this fatal flaw has a fairly simple remedy: offline maps. Google Maps lets you download offline maps of specified areas. In the event your signal drops out, your navigation will automatically flip over to the offline map and continue providing directions, with the main noticeable changes being a lack of live traffic updates and alternative routes. The only catch is that you need to manually select a region and download the map ahead of time. If you’re taking a vacation somewhere, for instance, you should scope out your route and destination ahead of time and download an offline map so you’re prepared.

Advertisement

Not tailoring notifications

In addition to giving you access to your maps and music, Android Auto also manages notifications coming in from your connected smartphone. Looking at your phone when you get a buzz is one of the most unsafe things you can do while you’re driving, so having that managed for you is a big help. That said, if you’re getting frequent notifications constantly pinging through your speakers and cluttering your infotainment display, it can be just as much of a hazardous distraction as looking at your phone screen.

If you want to keep things focused while you’re driving with Android Auto, the best course of action is to use your Android Auto settings to tailor the extent to which notifications occur and how much they show. If you check the Messaging section of your Android Auto settings, you’ll find four sequential toggles: whether you want message notifications at all, whether you want notifications from group chats, whether you want Android Auto to display the first line of messages, and whether to play the notification chime. Use these toggles to determine how insistent your notifications are. 

Advertisement

Leaving automatic media resume off

Here’s an annoying scenario: you’re driving around town, running errands, and every time you get back in your car after a stop, you have to manually unlock your phone and start up the music or podcast you were listening to. Even if your Android Auto is set up to work without your phone having to be unlocked, it’s still frustrating to have to do a bunch of clicking before you can get back on the road, especially if you’re in a rush. The fewer clicks, the better, which is why you should ensure that automatic media resume is enabled in your Android Auto settings.

Under the Startup section of your Android Auto settings on your smartphone, right under the Start Android Auto while locked toggle, you’ll find another toggle marked Start music automatically. When this toggle is enabled, as soon as your phone is connected to Android Auto, such as when you start your car, it’ll automatically resume playback on whatever you were listening to before you stopped. It’s a small feature, but it’s nice when you can just connect your phone and get right back on the road instead of having to manually open an app and press play.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Google is adding voice AI to Gmail, Docs, and Keep, whether users like it or not

Published

on

What just happened? Google introduced its Gemini Audio AI models earlier this year, during the latest developer-focused I/O conference. Now, the advertising corporation is going to bring these additional features to three of its most popular mobile apps for Workspace customers.

Google is significantly expanding Gemini Live’s reach to Gmail, Docs, and Keep, at least for paying customers of the enterprise-focused Workspace service. The Alphabet company highlights how these new capabilities will enrich its customers’ day-to-day lives with a new option to use their apps and personal data, but not all users seem ecstatic about the idea of talking to a mail client on the phone.

The newly announced features are based on Gemini Live’s conversational AI models, so they are conveniently named Gmail Live, Docs Live, and Keep Live. Thanks to Gmail Live, customers can quickly recall important details about a meeting or their kids’ school events. They will just need to ask the app what they want in natural language, and Gmail will (hopefully) bring the right details to the conversation.

Docs Live does not necessarily work on pre-existing data. The AI feature is designed to be a “co-writer” for new document projects, helping users lay out a first draft based on “rough” thoughts and ideas. Furthermore, Docs Live can also extract “relevant” details from other Workspace apps (Gmail, Drive, Chat, etc.) if the user grants specific permissions to do so.

Advertisement

Finally, Keep Live is conceived as a novel way to turn whimsical, undefined notes and ideas into more organized and therefore “actionable” notes. Google is inviting users to “dump” their mind’s content in the company’s note-taking app, and then ask Gemini Live’s AI engine to turn a stream of consciousness into a more useful list of data or ideas. Google added that Gemini should be able to understand everything being said.

Gemini Live’s new conversational features for Gmail, Docs, and Keep are already rolling out to eligible subscribers of Google AI Plus, Pro, and Ultra plans. Furthermore, they should arrive soon for business customers using Google’s Workspace productivity suite.

While some people consider talking to a mobile app a rather natural way to interact with computers and personal devices, others see it differently. Some early reactions to Google’s new conversational features highlight the ever-growing number of AI tools that are now being proposed to interact with Android apps, while one disgruntled user said that “chatting” with an email app is definitely not the most appealing thing to do on a phone.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Job changes at the top and very safe hands

Published

on

In this week’s Sunday Reboot, the sudden top-table rule changes and how John Ternus will be a good Apple CEO, whether he likes it or not.

Sunday Reboot is a weekly column covering some of the lighter stories within the Apple reality distortion field from the past seven days. All to get next week underway with a good first step.

More than one job change

September is always a big month for Apple, but this one is bigger than ever. Not because of the inbound hardware, but because of the people making it.

The key change is at the top of the Apple executive food chain, as the multi-month transition process has almost concluded. John Ternus is now the CEO, taking over from Tim Cook, but that doesn’t mean the process has ended.

Advertisement

Of course, there’s some behind-the-scenes logistics happening, such as Cook moving out of his office and into a new one for the leadership-adjacent position of executive chairman of the board.

Ternus, meanwhile, will be watching some hardware lackeys shifting cardboard boxes full of circuit boards and unused tech from his old office to his new one. It’s a big move too, as he will be among his fellow executives instead of near his beloved hardware teams.

It’s a thing that has to happen, as Ternus takes the mantle. Though inevitably other unintended changes are also underway too.

Middle-aged man in a blue button-down shirt speaking with hands raised slightly, standing indoors near large windows with soft natural light and blurred greenery in the background

Apple Fellow Phil Schiller

Advertisement

Apple Fellow Phil Schiller has decided to reduce his workload. He’s switched out of running the App Store for a more relaxed existence within Apple, presumably taking another step to retirement.

Then there’s Luca Maestri, who was the previous CFO but continued managing Corporate Services. Except he’s not doing that anymore and current CFO Kevan Parekh has picked up those duties too.

We know that seismic change can prompt other employment updates, and a new CEO would certainly count as one. But there was no serious expectation of a mass exodus as Ternus took his seat.

There still isn’t that expectation, but it doesn’t stop things like this from happening. We do know that the Schiller change was in the last days of Cook’s management, but Maestri’s decision took place a few weeks ago, long before the CEO switch.

Advertisement

It’s probably safe to say that the two changes are not massively consequential to Apple.

At least, Schiller’s App Store withdrawal could be a bit worrying, until you consider it’s only part of a larger Services division. Maestri’s post-CFO role was also not what you would call critical to Apple’s success, or at least wasn’t as critical as managing a massive segment of the company.

Besides, this CEO transition has been going on for months. Anyone who would’ve seriously objected to Ternus being in control has had ample time to get out of Dodge.

The people who are still leading Apple are going to hang around for quite a while longer.

Advertisement

Ocean liner management

As the opening weeks and months of Ternus control continue, there may be the threat of more managerial shake-ups. But it certainly won’t be from radical moves by the CEO.

You can expect him to make small changes to how the company functions. I say small in a relative fashion, because Apple is a tech giant.

His changes need to be like a captain steering a cruise ship. It takes time to slow down and to adjust course, as rocking the boat of that size would be dangerous.

That is to say, anything he decrees will take a long time to become an actual problem for someone. If a problem does indeed manifest down the road.

Advertisement

Then there’s the corporate culture, since any decision Ternus makes will affect thousands of people. Even though the CEO’s word is effectively gospel, if there are enough people who disagree, there’s always the risk of a mutiny.

Two men in casual dark clothing walk and talk along a curving paved path in a landscaped park, surrounded by trees, shrubs, and tall grasses on a sunny day

Apple CEO John Ternus [left] and previous CEO Tim Cook [right]

There is one more safety barrier in place to prevent Ternus from creating a Titanic-like situation. Cook is still hanging around.

Sure, he’s not going to have much of a say on what products Apple will develop. Nor should you expect him to appear during an Apple event video in the future.

Advertisement

But it’s hard to get away from the thought that Ternus won’t have free rein without Cook’s oversight or advice.

Cook has a wealth of experience as captain of the SS Cupertino, and it would be foolish for Ternus not to listen to anything Cook says.

You’re not going to get any insane company-destroying proclamations coming from Ternus. Anything that he does say will have been discussed and debated to an exhaustive degree to keep it sane and safe.

Ternus is a safe pair of hands. But even if he wasn’t and was hell-bent on hitting an iceberg, Cook would still be a sanity safety net.

Advertisement

Last week’s Sunday Reboot discussed Apple’s early Mac upgrades and John Ternus meeting Pikachu.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Saturn’s South Pole Is Apparently Decagon-Shaped

Published

on

Saturn's north pole captured by Cassini in 2013. (Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSI/CICLOPS/Kevin M. Gill)
Saturn’s north pole captured by Cassini in 2013. (Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSI/CICLOPS/Kevin M. Gill)

Although some would argue that the hexagon is the bestagon, astronomers have discovered that Saturn appears to favor the ten-sided decagon on its south pole. This comes as its south pole has recently been confirmed to show a pattern that’s oddly ten-sided, per a recent research article by [Agustín Sánchez-Lavega] et al. in Science Advances.

Because Saturn is a gas giant, this naturally isn’t some gigantic planet-sized rock formation, but rather an interesting wave phenomenon in this massive gas bubble. The hexagon shape on its north pole had been known about for a while already, so it is perhaps not too surprising to find something similar on its south pole.

These shapes are generally the result of standing waves within a polar vortex, through the interaction of waves in Saturn’s atmosphere. For the north pole hexagon, the formation is driven by an intense eastward jet, but no similar wave had been reported for the planet’s south pole.

While in this paper a decagon shape is identified based on multiple observations, they postulate that it’s due to a meandering wave in the area rather than a jet as at the other pole. This clearly doesn’t make this wave pattern as obvious as the one at the north pole, but it provides another fascinating insight into fluid dynamics scaled up to a planetary gas giant.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

TiVo Will Start Charging Fees For Its Automatic Commercial Break-Skipping Feature 'SkipMode'

Published

on

TiVo is notifying customers about changes to “one of its longest-standing and most popular DVR features,” reports the blog Cord Cutter News:

Starting November 2, 2026, the current version of SkipMode that allows users to jump over commercial breaks with a single button press on the remote will no longer be available. The company is instead preparing to test a new paid add-on called Premium Auto Commercial Skip.

SkipMode has been a core part of the TiVo experience for years. After a supported show finished recording, the service added markers that let viewers leap from the end of one program segment directly to the start of the next, bypassing the ads in between. On newer TiVo Experience 4 devices, users could even set the feature to automatic so commercials were skipped without any remote interaction. The feature was limited to popular prime-time programming on major networks, typically appearing a short time after a show aired.

Under the new plan, that one-button and automatic functionality will disappear from the standard service. Viewers will still be able to skip commercials the traditional way by using the 30-second skip button or the fast-forward control on their remotes. Those manual methods have existed on TiVo boxes for more than two decades and do not rely on the company’s commercial-detection data.
In November, TiVo will offer a 30-day free trial of the new Premium Auto Commercial Skip service. After the trial ends, customers who want to keep the automatic or one-button skip capability will need to add it to their accounts for an extra monthly fee.

Advertisement

The company has not yet published the price.

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader AmiMoJo for sharing the article.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025