• Microsoft’s July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixed a record 622 vulnerabilities, including 58 critical, two exploited in the wild, and one publicly disclosed, plus 428 Chromium bugs
• Actively abused flaws include CVE‑2026‑56155 (AD FS privilege escalation) and CVE‑2026‑56164 (SharePoint privilege escalation), alongside notable issues in BitLocker and Copilot
• Surge in fixes is linked to Microsoft’s use of Anthropic’s Mythos AI, with patch volumes rising sharply since its adoption

Microsoft has released its July 2026 Patch Tuesday download, marking another record-breaking update, addressing hundreds of flaws across the ecosystem.

The release, which is currently rolling out to Microsoft users, fixes a staggering 622 vulnerabilities, including 58 critical-severity ones, two that were observed as being abused in the wild, and one which has already been publicly disclosed.

Anthony Albanese has told the AI industry that Australian books, music, and journalism are not free training data, and that any large data centre built in the country will have to put more electricity into the grid than it draws out. Neither of those things is law yet.

The prime minister used a speech at the University of Sydney on Wednesday to announce an Office of AI inside his own department, effective immediately, plus Australian Standards covering energy, water, copyright, and siting.

It lands two days after Anthropic and others were reported to be weighing tens of billions in data centre investment against a copyright carve-out Canberra had already ruled out.

The energy obligation is the sharpest thing in the speech. Operators of the next generation of large data centres would be required to underwrite new power supply, pay their full share of grid connection so that no costs land on homes or businesses, and put at least as much energy into the grid as they take out of it.

“To be net-generators, not net-users,” Albanese said. That means funding new renewable generation and firming rather than joining a queue for someone else’s electrons, a heavier ask than anything hyperscalers face in Europe or the US, where grids are already buckling under connection requests.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Water got similar treatment. Operators would have to minimise water use, maximise energy efficiency, and pay for any additional water infrastructure they need, on a continent Albanese called both the sunniest and the driest on earth.

Copyright got the rhetoric. “Let me make this crystal clear: not everything produced in Australia is up for grabs,” he said. “Not at all.” Australian writers, musicians, artists, and journalists “must retain ownership and control of their work”, and no company should train on it without the artist’s control of its price and value. “Anything less, is theft.”

What the speech did not contain was a mechanism. The policy has been read as obliging AI firms to reach agreements with local artists and media before using their content, but Albanese never said how that control would be enforced, and the attorney-general’s consultation on copyright is still open.

The distance between announced and legislated is the story here. Nothing unveiled on Wednesday binds anyone: the Office of AI is an executive creation, the standards go to National Cabinet next month, and legislation is only targeted for introduction early next year.

Albanese was candid that he does not want an exhaustive rulebook. “It is not our goal to try and legislate for every possible eventuality or risk,” he said. That is a lighter touch than the language around it implies, and closer to the ground Brussels has been retreating to than to the AI Act as drafted.

His claim that Australia “will be the first country in the world to bring these issues into a single, national framework” is doing work it cannot carry. The EU adopted the AI Act in 2024 and built an AI Office to run it, as legal scholars noted within hours.

Reaction divided on schedule. Greenpeace Australia’s Joe Rafalowicz called the facilities “water-guzzling energy vampires”, accusing the government of rolling out the red carpet while leaving them unregulated until at least 2027. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said the office would just create more bureaucracy.

New York, hours before Albanese spoke, halted large data centre builds for a year, the pause Australia has now declined to take. Washington is still arguing over who pays when data centres raise power bills, the question Albanese thinks he has answered in advance.

Anthropic, which told Treasurer Jim Chalmers that its A$21.6bn Australian investment depended on copyright certainty, said it respected the process and would meet the terms the government sets. That is a company waiting for the fine print.

APRA AMCOS chief executive Dean Ormston welcomed the certainty but said the Office of AI “must seriously interrogate the numbers AI platforms are putting on the table”. The numbers are not on the table yet. Neither is the bill.

A new official filing marks the conclusion of another regulatory hurdle that has been preventing Apple Intelligence from launching in Apple’s crucial Chinese market.

In mid-June 2026, Apple’s Chinese partner Alibaba unveiled its latest AI model and, most significantly, revealed that it was now compatible with Apple Intelligence. Now according to Reuters, China’s cyberspace regulator has allowed Apple Intelligence to be registered for use on iPhones in the region.

China has complex requirements for regulatory approval, and sufficiently so that US firms typically need to involve a local partner. It’s not certain yet whether this latest listing is the final step toward Apple Intelligence launching in China, but it appears to be, and it marks more than two years of effort from Apple.

Apple has not commented on the regulator’s listing, and Alibaba has only confirmed certain details that were already presumed. Specifically, the company stated that its new Qwen AI model will be integrated into Apple Intelligence, when that becomes available for iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple Vision Pro users in China.

The report also cites an unspecified source saying that Apple Intelligence will also incorporate technologies from Baidu. This has also been presumed, as despite seemingly choosing against Baidu as a full partner in 2024, Apple reportedly signed with the company for specific functions such as Visual Intelligence.

Apple Intelligence has effectively required partnerships with local companies even though Apple has been able to release iOS in the country without the same level of scrutiny. This is because China has restrictive laws about generative AI software, large language models, and data privacy.

It’s sufficiently difficult to obtain Chinese government approval for any such services, that OpenAI is banned in the country. Apple needed to partner with firms such as Alibaba and Baidu which already had certain approvals. Use of these Chinese firms, though, also raises issues over how Apple Intelligence will be censored in the country.

Apple appears to have worked through all the technical issues, though, and has been waiting only for regulatory approval. That’s because in March 2026, Apple Intelligence was briefly enabled in China, apparently by mistake.

Facepalm: The UK and Europe are going through an unprecedented heatwave right now. It’s causing a lot of problems, including devices that keep overheating as temperatures soar. To try to cool them down, some Brits have been placing them in their fridges and freezers, but the only thing this results in is more work for repair shops.

Jamie Farnell, a repair shop owner in the UK town of Wem told the BBC that he has been flooded with devices suffering from internal moisture damage recently.

Farnell believes the damage was caused by phones and tablets being put in fridges and freezers as the mercury soared.

During last month’s extreme heatwave, an iPad exploded in the shop after a customer brought it in with a swollen lithium battery.

For a lot of people, placing a device in a fridge or freezer when it shows an overheating warning, or obvious signs it is getting too hot, seems like a good idea. The practice has become more popular since social media videos started pushing it as a smart and easy solution.

@itsprincemarko Putting your phone in the Fridge helps actually 📲 #android #androidtips #princetechtips ♬ original sound – Prince Marko

In reality, of course, it’s very risky. One of the biggest problems is condensation. When a warm device enters a fridge or freezer, warm, humid air trapped around or inside the phone cools rapidly. As that air drops below its dew point, water vapor can condense on the phone’s surfaces, ports, speaker openings, or potentially inside the casing.

When the chilled phone is removed, the risk can become greater because warm room air hits the cold device and condenses on it – similar to moisture forming on a cold drink.

Moisture inside a device can lead to lots of issues, from corrosion to short circuits.

There are also risks from thermal shock, in which a sudden temperature change can stress the screen, glass, seals, adhesives, and internal components; and battery damage from the extreme cold.

So, while these measures will technically cool a device, there are plenty of other methods that won’t likely break them.

Farnell says this practice is reminiscent of another popular myth: drying out a wet phone with rice. This was especially popular at a time when phones had removable batteries and weren’t water-resistant. But it’s ineffective as rice cannot draw liquid out of sealed internal spaces very well. This method can also cause problems, such as the rice dust and starch entering ports and speakers.

Both Apple and Samsung recommend letting an overheating phone cool naturally in a cooler, shaded environment – not putting it in a fridge or freezer.

WHOOP does not have the presence in the wearable space as other brands, but in certain circles, it’s a household name. Their business model requires you to have a yearly app subscription to use their fitness tracker, but here at Hackaday, we are big fans of actually owning the devices you buy — which is why we were happy to hear about an open source and subscription free WHOOP compatible app!

The goal of the so-called OpenStrap project is not to re-create the WHOOP app. Rather, the algorithms and processing methods are developed from scratch, based on public research. It’s all calculated locally on a 1 Hz interval, based on the data the WHOOP 4.0 device feeds the app. As such, the health data collected from the watch, never leaves the phone. While not the main goal of the project, the privacy improvement of the app’s serverless nature cannot be overstated. However, to display metrics, you first need to get data off the WHOOP to begin with.

The crux of the issue with making the WHOOP 4.0 work without the official app is the reliance on proprietary Bluetooth protocols. Fortunately, the protocol itself ended up being relatively simple. The WHOOP 4.0 amounts to little more than a series of sensors that sit on the user’s wrist. As such, the app can subscribe to the Bluetooth feed and decode the data, right? Well, the devil is always in the details with such things, and the protocol came with its fair share of quirks. The hardware clock needs to be synchronized, or it simply defaults to zero Unix time. Moreover, the analog sensors like, ambient temperature are given in relative ADC values, and are not terribly useful without calibration. Regardless, the result of the reverse engineering effort speaks for itself with the OpenStrap app able to recreate much of the functionality in WHOOP’s official app.

Quite often, devices reliant on proprietary apps are little more than manufactured e-waste. While we don’t expect many of you to actually own a WHOOP 4.0, we do hope to see the OpenStrap project keep at least a few out of the landfill in the future.

A look at Anthropic safety hiring shows exactly what it fears: analysts brought in to stop its models teaching anyone how to build nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.

Most job ads sell a mission. Anthropic’s read like a threat assessment.

The company has posted a run of openings for enforcement analysts whose job is to keep its AI from helping people build weapons, run scams, or commit cybercrime, Axios first reported. One listing seeks an “Enforcement Analyst focused on Radiological & Nuclear Harms.” Others cover chemicals and explosives, financial fraud, and more.

The pay lands in the mid- to upper-$200,000s. The work is not coding. Anthropic wants real-world expertise in fields like biology and explosives. It also wants people who can think like an attacker trying to slip past its defences.

Naming the harm on purpose

The blunt job titles are deliberate. “Ensuring our models don’t provide potentially harmful information is central to responsible development,” a spokesperson said. The company said it regularly hires experts in sensitive fields to stress-test its models before a release.

Spelling out the exact harm, it added, is how you recruit the right people. Anthropic says hundreds of staff now work on safety, probing for weak spots and patching them.

This is the company that critics call the industry’s biggest doomsayer. The pattern in Anthropic safety hiring is its answer to that label. It is spending real money on the risks it keeps describing.

The catastrophe Amodei keeps describing

Chief executive Dario Amodei has spent months sketching the downside. In a January essay he called biological attacks the scenario that worries him most.

“I do not think biological attacks will necessarily be carried out the instant it becomes widely possible,” he wrote. “But added up across millions of people and a few years of time, I think there is a serious risk of a major attack, with casualties potentially in the millions or more.”

He has also warned about AI helping cybercriminals and empowering authoritarian states. Earlier this year Anthropic broke with the US Defense Department over the use of its technology for mass surveillance and autonomous weapons.

The labs are writing their own rules

OpenAI is doing the same. It is hiring a researcher on biological and chemical risks, at a base salary of up to $445,000. As models grow more capable, every serious lab is racing to staff a red team.

That race is happening in a vacuum. The US still has no comprehensive AI safety law. Congress has tried for years and passed nothing. Some want a referee: Google’s Demis Hassabis has floated a Wall Street-style watchdog for frontier models. Fewer than one in a hundred AI PhDs go into government, so the expertise sits inside the companies.

The result is a strange kind of self-regulation. The firms building the most dangerous capability are also the ones deciding how to fence it in. Amodei has named that tension himself, calling AI companies the next tier of risk after hostile states. His careers page is the argument and the warning in one place. The people best placed to stop the catastrophe work for the company that could help cause it.

T+A does not build inexpensive audio components, and its new HV reference pairing makes no attempt to wander into that unfamiliar part of town where tourists buy four-euro spätzle and lederhosen assembled somewhere considerably less German.

The German manufacturer has formally launched the SDX 3100 HV streaming DAC and preamplifier for $44,900 alongside the A 3100 HV stereo power amplifier for $29,900. The complete two-box system costs $74,800 before adding loudspeakers, cables, an equipment rack, or the optional $2,190 MM or MC phono module.

We first encountered both components at AXPONA 2026, but confirmed pricing, final specifications, and availability make them worthy of a closer look. The A 3100 HV began shipping on July 9th in silver or titanium, while SDX 3100 HV availability is rolling out through dealers, with some North American listings indicating August delivery.

The price will dominate the conversation, because $74,800 remains a serious amount of money even by high-end audio standards. What T+A is offering, however, is not merely another streamer connected to a large amplifier. The SDX 3100 HV and A 3100 HV represent a highly integrated reference system that combines some genuinely unusual digital architecture with enough amplification to drive almost any conventional passive loudspeaker.

Related Reviews:

The SDX 3100 HV Is More Than a Streamer

The SDX 3100 HV replaces the SDV 3100 HV at the top of T+A’s digital lineup, combining a network streamer, DAC, fully analog preamplifier, headphone amplifier, tuner, and system controller inside a 57-pound aluminum chassis.

Its most significant technical feature is T+A’s Path Separation Technology, which routes PCM and DSD through different conversion architectures rather than forcing both formats through the same DAC design.

PCM signals are handled by a double-differential quadruple converter using four 32-bit sigma-delta DAC channels per side, supporting rates up to 768kHz through USB. DSD travels through T+A’s proprietary True 1-Bit converter without first being converted to PCM, with USB playback supported up to DSD1024.

There is an important distinction buried beneath that impressive headline number. DSD512 and DSD1024 require a compatible Windows computer with T+A’s driver or a Linux system running a supported kernel. Network streaming is currently specified up to DSD256, which remains more than sufficient for almost every commercially available recording but is not quite the same as streaming DSD1024 from a NAS while congratulating yourself on having survived another firmware update.

T+A’s De-Jitter Masterclock examines incoming clock signals and routes anything failing its stability requirements through an additional PLL stage. Separate quartz oscillators are used for the 44.1kHz and 48kHz frequency families, reducing the need for sample-rate conversion between them. The SDX also provides selectable digital filters, including FIR, Bezier, and two NOS options.

Streaming Without Another Proprietary Island

The third-generation Audiophile Streaming Architecture, or ASA G3, supports TIDAL Connect, Qobuz Connect, Spotify Connect, Amazon Music HD, Deezer, HIGHRESAUDIO, Apple AirPlay 2, Audirvana, internet radio, and locally stored music.

Roon certification is still listed as being in progress. That will need to be completed quickly because a $44,900 streaming component should not arrive with a significant software feature still waiting in the departure lounge.

Wired Gigabit Ethernet and dual-band Wi-Fi 6 are included, along with Bluetooth 5.4 using aptX HD, AAC, SBC, and MP3. Bluetooth is clearly present for convenience rather than as the preferred method for extracting everything the SDX can deliver.

Physical connectivity is extensive. The digital section includes AES/EBU, coaxial, BNC, optical, USB, two HDMI inputs, and an HDMI output with ARC. The specification currently lists ARC rather than eARC, although that is unlikely to present a meaningful bandwidth limitation in a two-channel system.

A Proper Analog Preamplifier

Many streaming DACs offer variable output and describe themselves as preamplifiers. The SDX 3100 HV takes the role more seriously.

Its fully symmetrical, double-mono preamplifier is constructed with discrete components and galvanically isolated from the digital circuitry. Volume is controlled by a relay-switched network with channel matching specified within 0.05dB at minus 60dB, where less carefully designed controls can begin shifting the image toward one loudspeaker.

The SDX also includes balanced and single-ended analog inputs, making it possible to connect tape machines, external phono stages, or other analog sources without converting them into the digital domain.

T+A has even included fully analog tone controls with individually adjustable bass and treble levels and selectable turnover frequencies. That is a more sophisticated approach than the usual bass and treble knobs, allowing some correction for loudspeaker balance, room placement, and difficult recordings without passing the signal through DSP.

It is not room correction, and there is no automated measurement system or sophisticated subwoofer bass management. Buyers looking for Dirac Live, ARC Genesis, or Linn Space Optimisation will need to solve those problems elsewhere.

The optional phono board is available in separate MM and MC versions for $2,190. At this price, including both cartridge types in one adjustable module would not have caused the accountants to begin rationing office supplies, but the internal option is still useful for owners seeking to avoid another box.

A discrete Class A headphone amplifier supplies both 6.3mm and 4.4mm Pentaconn outputs. T+A specifies a six-ohm output impedance and up to 200mA of current, making it considerably more substantial than the convenience headphone circuits often added to digital components.

The A 3100 HV Offers Two Amplifiers in One

The matching A 3100 HV replaces the A 3000 HV, which remained in production for more than a decade. T+A claims more than 270 engineering changes, including revised board layouts, tighter-tolerance components, improved thermal management, and a new High Current operating mode.

T+A’s HV designation refers to its use of much higher internal operating voltages than conventional solid-state circuits. The objective is to keep the transistors working within a smaller and more linear portion of their operating range, pursuing some of the linearity associated with tubes without using tubes or their eventual maintenance requirements.

In High Current mode, the output stage runs at substantially increased idle current and can deliver up to 75 watts in pure Class A before transitioning into Class AB operation. This mode is intended for systems where listeners value the amplifier’s highest-bias operation and do not require maximum output.

Switching to High Power mode changes the priorities. The A 3100 HV is rated at 300 watts per channel into eight ohms and 500 watts into four ohms, with short-term output reaching 380 watts into eight ohms and as much as 650 to 700 watts into four ohms, depending on the measurement listed.

Those figures come from a 1,000-watt toroidal transformer and 120,000µF of reservoir capacitance. The power supply is magnetically shielded and physically separated from the audio circuitry behind a 10mm aluminum partition. Voltage and current amplification are located on separate boards and galvanically isolated to reduce interaction between the input stages and the current being delivered to the loudspeakers.

The amplifier can also be switched into mono operation, allowing owners to add a second A 3100 HV. At that point, the electronics alone rise to $104,700 before contemplating T+A’s optional external power supplies. The phrase “diminishing returns” may be heard faintly in the distance, but nobody in this market appears to be returning its calls.

What Does It Compete With?

There is no perfect direct competitor because T+A combines several product categories in an unusual two-box arrangement.

Naim’s closest conceptual alternative requires an NSS 333 streamer, NAC 332 preamplifier, and two NAP 350 mono power amplifiers. The NAP 350 delivers 175 watts into eight ohms and 345 watts into four ohms, making the Naim system less powerful on paper while requiring four chassis before optional external power supplies enter the discussion.

The CH Precision I1 takes the opposite approach. It combines preamplification, power amplification, DAC functionality, and optional streaming and phono modules in one configurable chassis. Its modular architecture is extremely flexible, but rated output is 100 watts per channel into eight ohms. The T+A system requires two shelves but provides far greater power and includes its full streaming platform as standard.

Boulder’s 866 Digital integrated amplifier also consolidates streaming, DAC, preamplification, and power amplification into one component. It delivers 200 watts into eight ohms and 400 watts into four ohms and supports Ethernet, USB, AES3, optical, AirPlay, and Roon. It is the more compact approach, although it lacks T+A’s separate native DSD conversion path and extensive direct streaming-service integration.

Linn’s Klimax DSM and Klimax Solo 800 amplifiers represent another logical comparison, especially for listeners interested in streaming, system integration, and room optimisation. Pricing places the T+A system in some perspective: a single Klimax Solo 800 starts at $51,190 in the United States, making a stereo pair $102,380 before adding the Klimax DSM source and preamplifier. Suddenly $74,800 starts looking merely extravagant rather than requiring intervention from concerned relatives.

Why This System Is Different

The SDX 3100 HV and A 3100 HV stand apart because they do not force buyers to choose between old-school analog engineering and a modern streaming system.

The SDX offers direct access to the major streaming platforms, HDMI ARC, high-resolution USB playback, analog inputs, optional phono support, proper preamplification, analog tone controls, and a robust headphone amplifier. The A 3100 HV can prioritize Class A operation for lower-level listening or switch to 500-watt Class AB output when the loudspeakers demand considerably more persuasion.

T+A has also managed to keep the complete system to two chassis. That will matter to buyers who want reference-level separates but have no desire to assemble a seven-box shrine requiring its own electrical subpanel and structural engineer.

The Bottom Line

There is no sensible way to describe $74,800 as affordable, and T+A does not need anyone performing financial gymnastics to make it sound reasonable.

A complete system with the phono module costs $76,990. Adding T+A’s optional $19,490 PS 3100 HV external power supply pushes the total to $96,480. Two amplifiers in mono operation take the system comfortably beyond six figures.

That pricing excludes almost everyone, including many serious audiophiles with excellent systems and perfectly healthy credit scores.

But judged within the reference electronics category, the T+A pairing is not an outlier. It competes with systems from Linn, CH Precision, Naim, Boulder, dCS, and other manufacturers for whom five-figure source components and power amplifiers are entirely normal.

The more relevant question is whether T+A’s two-box architecture can deliver enough of the performance, flexibility, and long-term usability of those larger systems to justify its substantial price.

On paper, the answer is at least plausible. The engineering is ambitious, the specifications are formidable, and the combination of native DSD conversion, real analog preamplification, selectable amplifier bias, and 500-watt output is unusual at any price.

Whether it sounds like $74,800 will require far more than reading the specification sheet while making approving German noises.

Pricing & Availability

The T+A A 3100 HV is available in silver or titanium for $29,900 and began shipping through authorized dealers on July 9, 2026.

The SDX 3100 HV is priced at $44,900, with dealer availability rolling out through July and August 2026.

The optional MM or MC phono module is $2,190.

The complete SDX 3100 HV and A 3100 HV system costs $74,800, or $76,990 with one of the phono modules.

For more information: ta-hifi.de

Related Reading:

Marantz has announced the launch of two new hi-fi separates at a more affordable prices.

The Model 70 integrated amplifier and CD 70 build on the success of the PM6007 and CD6007, and shows that while everyone’s getting into hybrid hi-fi products and active speakers, there’s still room for specialist hi-fi separates in the market.

Both feature Marantz’s full-width architecture that’s made their recent products stand out, and will be available in black and silver-gold finishes, a look that Marantz hopes will “appeal to culture-driven consumers who see audio as an integral part of their home environment”.

Inside the Model 70 is Class AB amplification that can deliver 50W per channel, and is supported by an enhanced power supply and larger toroidal transformer. Marantz says that this configuration results in “greater dynamic expression, improved speaker control and increased authority across a wide range of loudspeaker pairings.”

Advertisement

There’s a “high-performance” DAC for “exceptional” digital playback quality, and even at this lower price, there’s room for Marantz’s proprietary HDAM circuitry that aims to “preserve the speed, accuracy and musical character” that’s defined the warm, detailed and musical sound of Marantz’s products.

Advertisement

Vinyl fans can make use of an MM phono stage, while there’s also HDMI ARC for connecting to a TV and aptX Adaptive Bluetooth to stream to the amplifier or connect a pair of wireless headphones to the amp. A range of analogue and digital inputs are provided, plus preamplifier and sub outputs to suit a “broad range of listening environments and system configurations”.

With CD enjoying some time back in the spotlight, those committed the silver disc will be able to have a Marantz CD player as part of their set-up going forward.

It has the same DAC and HDAM circuitry as the Model 70, with a front-panel USB-A input and support for FLAC, ALAC, AIFF and DSD files. A built-in headphone amplifier ensures private listening with a pair of wired headphones.

Advertisement

Marantz says that “every aspect” of the CD 70’s build has been carefully optimised to minimise noise and preserve musical detail. and this includes an upgraded power supply: double-layered chassis base, rigid isolation feet and “strategically” deployed copper hardware that contribute to “improved stability and reduced interference”

Advertisement

The Model 70 integrated amplifier is priced at €850 / £749, and reportedly won’t be available to buy in North America. However, the CD 70 will go on sale in North America, with availability starting from August 15th for $750 / €600 / £499.

Advertisement