In a new blog post, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has admitted that it received a letter from the Defense Department, officially labeling it a supply chain risk. He said he doesn’t “believe this action is legally sound,” and that his company sees “no choice” but to challenge it in court. Hours before Amodei published the post, the Pentagon announced that it notified the company that its “products are deemed a supply chain risk, effective immediately.”

If you’ll recall, the Defense Department (called the Department of War under the current administration) threatened to give the company the designation typically reserved for firms from adversaries like China if it didn’t agree to remove its safeguards over mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. President Trump then ordered federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s tech.

Amodei explained that the designation has a narrow scope, because it only exists to protect the government. That is why the general public, and even Defense Department contractors, can still use Anthropic’s Claude chatbot and its AI technologies. Microsoft told CNBC that it will continue using Claude after its lawyers had concluded that it can keep on working with Anthropic on non-defense related projects.

The CEO has also admitted that his company had “productive conversations” with the department over the past few days. He said that they were looking at ways to serve the Pentagon that adheres to its two exceptions, namely that its technology not be used for mass surveillance and the development of fully autonomous weapons, and at ways to “ensure a smooth transition if that is not possible.” That confirms reports that Anthropic is back in talks with the agency in an effort to reach a new deal. In addition, he apologized for a leaked internal memo, wherein he reportedly said that OpenAI’s messaging about its own deal with the department is “just straight up lies.”

Apple has launched a new budget iPhone called the iPhone 17e. The smartphone focuses on offering key upgrades without increasing the price. It includes the A19 chip, MagSafe charging, and more base storage than before. Pre-orders for the device are already open, and the phone will start reaching stores next week. It offers several core iPhone features while keeping the price lower than flagship models. The smartphone starts with 256GB of storage, doubling the base capacity from the earlier version. The phone is available in black, white, and a new soft pink color.

What’s new with the iPhone 17e?

The iPhone 17e runs on Apple’s A19 chip, the same processor used in the standard iPhone 17. This helps the device deliver faster performance and supports Apple Intelligence features powered by AI. Another major upgrade is MagSafe support. For the first time, Apple’s budget iPhone supports MagSafe wireless charging at up to 15W, faster than the 7.5W charging on the previous model.

Furthermore, Apple has equipped the iPhone 17e with a 6.1-inch Super Retina display and the new Ceramic Shield 2 protection. This upgrade is designed to improve scratch resistance and reduce screen glare. The phone also features a 48MP Fusion camera that supports optical-quality 2x zoom, offering a versatile camera experience from a single lens.

Apple has upgraded connectivity on the iPhone 17e by adding the new C1X cellular modem. According to the company, this modem can be up to twice as fast as the one used in the previous model. The phone offers all-day battery life, runs iOS 26, and is IP68-rated for water and dust protection. It also supports satellite-based services like Emergency SOS, Messages via satellite, Roadside Assistance, and Find My.

Price and Availability

The base model of the iPhone 17e starts at $599 and comes with 256GB of internal storage. There is also a 512GB model available. Apple has maintained the base price of the new model even though it has increased the base internal storage. Pre-orders for the new model began on March 4, and shipments will start on March 11. The new model will be available in over 70 countries, including the USA, India, the UK, Japan, Canada, and Australia.

How to Pre-Order the iPhone 17e

Buyers can pre-order the iPhone 17e on the Apple website or through the Apple Store application. The steps to do so are easy and fast.

• Visit the Apple website.
• Select the iPhone 17e model.
• Choose the color and size of the storage.
• Confirm the order and choose delivery or collection.

Tycoon 2FA accounted for around 62pc of all phishing attempts blocked by Microsoft by mid-2025.

A joint cybersecurity operation has disrupted one of the world’s largest phishing-as-a-service platforms, called ‘Tycoon 2FA’ and used to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA) and hack user accounts.

The operation was coordinated by Europol’s European Cybercrime Centre, while technical disruption was led by Microsoft. Participating industry partners also included Cloudflare, Coinbase, Proofpoint and Esentire, among others.

Japanese cybersecurity firm Trend Micro shared intelligence that allowed the investigation to initiate, Europol noted. Law enforcement authorities from several European countries, including Spain and the UK, also participated.

Tycoon 2FA provided cybercriminals with a subscription-based toolkit that intercepted live authentication sessions to gain unauthorised access to online accounts, including those that were protected by additional security layers.

The platform has been active since at least 2023, according to Europol, and enabled “thousands” of cybercriminals to access email and cloud-based service accounts. Experts determined that the platform generated “tens of millions” of phishing emails each month, attempting to gain access to nearly 100,000 organisations globally, including schools, hospitals and public institutions.

“Campaigns leveraging Tycoon 2FA have appeared across nearly all sectors including education, healthcare, finance, non-profit and government,” said Microsoft.

“Its rise in popularity among cybercriminals likely stemmed from disruptions of other popular phishing services”, it noted.

Tycoon 2FA accounted for around 62pc of all phishing attempts blocked by Microsoft by mid-2025. Its platform enabled threat actors to impersonate trusted brands by copying sign-in pages for services including Microsoft’s own 365 and OneDrive, and Gmail. It also allowed criminals to access sensitive information even after passwords were reset.

Targets were lured through phishing emails containing attachments with svg, pdf, html or docx files, often embedded with QR codes or JavaScript. To evade detection, the platform used techniques such as anti-bot screening, browser fingerprinting and self-hosted Captchas.

The joint industry and law enforcement operation led to the disruption of 330 domains that formed the core infrastructure of the criminal service, including phishing pages and control panels.

However, Microsoft pointed out that Tycoon 2FA illustrates the “evolution of phishing kits in response to rising enterprise defences”. The platform shows how cybercriminals adapt lures, infrastructure and evasion techniques to stay ahead of detection.

Recently, Google and iVerify highlighted the existence of a hacking mechanism, with suspected US origins, now used by bad actors to infiltrate outdated iPhones.

Meanwhile, Amazon last month highlighted how commercial AI is being used by less technically savvy cybercriminals to scale cyberattacks on enterprises.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

Data removal services claim to remove your details from data broker databases, thereby limiting how often your information is bought and sold. They become increasingly popular as more people start to realize how widely their personal data is shared online. However, uncertainty is common. Do they work? Are they legitimate or just another online scam?

People want to know if these tools are actually effective and how they manage their data. Especially that results aren’t instant, and not every provider offers the same level of automation, coverage, or follow-up.

That brings us to Incogni, one of the most talked-about names in this industry. This in-depth review examines whether Incogni is good, how well it actually works, whether it’s trustworthy, and how it positions itself against the competition in 2026.

Incogni Overview (2026)

What Is Incogni?

Incogni is an automated personal data removal service. It’s designed to reduce your online availability by contacting data brokers and requesting the deletion of your personal information from their databases. This way, you don’t have to chase numerous companies individually. Incogni also keeps track of answers to the requests and sends follow-ups when needed.

Instead of tiresome and never-ending manual opt-outs, Incogni centralizes the process, operating under privacy laws like the GDPR and CCPA. 

The provider offers the following features:

• Automated data removals: Incogni sends removal requests on your behalf to over 420 brokers (additional sites in higher-tier plans).
• Customer data removals: You can submit specific sites or data sources for additional takedown attempts (plan-dependent feature).
• Recurring removal cycles: Incogni automatically resends removal requests (every 60-90 days) to avoid relistings.
• Progress reports and tracking dashboard: The service offers real-time tracking of which brokers were contacted and how they responded.
• Family coverage: Specific plans allow adding multiple household members under one account for wider protection.
• Ongoing monitoring: Incogni doesn’t stop after one round of requests, maintaining broker coverage over time.

Its focus isn’t a one-time cleanup but ongoing data exposure management.

How Incogni Actually Works

Incogni’s process is built around automation and legal rights.

Step 1: Authorization

After you create an account, you need to verify your identity. This will allow Incogni to legally act on your behalf when contacting data brokers.

Step 2: Broker Outreach

Incogni starts sending deletion requests immediately. Its data broker list includes hundreds of brokers, both public and private listings.

Step 3: Tracking

Incogni’s straightforward dashboard logs all the responses, confirmations, and pending cases, so you can (but you don’t have to) oversee the process.

Step 4: Recurring Removals

As data can easily reappear some time after its removal, Incogni submits requests on a cycle. Usually, it’s every 60 days for public brokers and 90 days for private brokers. This step is essential if you want to achieve long-term effectiveness.

This repeat system is what makes this different from one-time opt-outs.

How Long Do Removals Take?

Sadly, there’s no rule, as it depends on the legal response window and broker processes, and both can be rather lengthy.

Under privacy regulations, e.g., GDPR and CCPA, companies usually have weeks to respond to data removal requests. Some respond quickly; others require follow-ups; some even try to ignore requests. That’s why Incogni uses recurring cycles.

Broker databases refresh on a regular basis, which makes removals an ongoing process. Over time, repeated requests reduce reappearance. According to Deloitte, since 2022, Incogni has processed 245+ million requests.

Pricing

Incogni is also included in broader privacy bundles: Surfshark One+ plan has Incogni alongside Surfshark’s VPN and other security tools. Moreover, there’s a bundle (Data removal & identity-theft protection, all-in-one) with Nord Protect, but it’s for US users only.

Customer Support

Incogni’s customer support is handled by its Help Center and ticket-based system. Users can easily access helpful guides and FAQs as well as submit requests for assistance. Incogni’s customer support team is known to respond quickly and to the point.

Email-style case support is the main channel. Live chat is available, while phone support comes with Unlimited plans only, giving higher-tier subscribers a more direct contact option.

User Experience

Incogni is designed to be low-maintenance, perfect for people who don’t want to bother doing it manually, as it can easily become a full-time job. As such, setup typically takes only minutes, and the service starts operating in the background. The dashboard is the main control center. It shows contacted brokers, confirmations, and pending requests or required follow-ups.

There are no spreadsheets to manage, no legal templates to send manually, and no need to track the deadlines or reappearances. Incogni was built to operate mostly in the background. So the interface focuses on visibility rather than technical complex details.

In short, Incogni provides transparency and visibility without requiring users to actively manage each step of the process.

Is Incogni Legit or a Scam?

Incogni is not a scam. Several verifiable signals from reputable sources confirm Incogni’s legitimacy.

Independent Limited Assessment

A limited assurance report from Deloitte examined Incogni’s removal process and concluded that it works as promised. As of now, this type of third-party assessment is pretty exceptional in the data removal industry, and external validation is essential when you want to entrust a provider with sensitive information.

Scale and Transparency

Deloitte also confirmed that Incogni’s claims that they have already processed hundreds of millions of removal requests for its customers is 100% true. The provider keeps documentation about how each request is sent and tracked. Moreover, its removal model relies on formal privacy-law opt-out requests, not simply informal takedown attempts.

Expert Recognition

Incogni has received Editors’ Choice Awards from both PCMag and PCWorld. Accompanying reviews praise the provider’s reliable performance, strong automation, broad data broker coverage, and transparency. They also highlight the handling of ongoing removal requests that require minimal effort from the user.

Public User Feedback

Incogni holds a rating of 4.4 on Trustpilot based on over 2,400 reviews. Most frequent positive mentions include:

• easy setup and automation,
• clear visibility and transparency about the removal progress,
• noticeable reductions in unsolicited messages and calls over time.

Some critical notes refer to how long it takes to see results and the fact that no service can truly guarantee complete data disappearance. However, that can be expected in this industry, and no provider, including Incogni, promises 100% successful removals.

Overall sentiment confirms that the service works as described, given realistic expectations.

Final Verdict: Incogni Is a Practical Tool for Ongoing Data Exposure Reduction

Incogni is an ongoing data removal service, not a one-time fix solution. It automates legally-backed opt-out requests to 420+ data brokers. Then, it repeats them on a schedule as needed and provides users with clear reports.

Independent assessment, editorial recognition, and positive user feedback confirm that the service works in a structured and reliable way.

Users need to know, though, that the results develop gradually – legal response takes time, and many broker databases constantly refresh. In that context, Incogni appears as an excellent choice, a long-term privacy management tool focused on steadily reducing how broadly your personal data circulates online. 

FAQ

Apple’s newly announced MacBook Neo might look like just another addition to the company’s laptop lineup. However, it quietly marks a significant milestone for Apple’s environmental goals.

According to Apple, the MacBook Neo contains 60% recycled content by weight. This is the highest percentage of recycled material used in any Apple product so far.

That figure is largely driven by the laptop’s enclosure. Apple says the MacBook Neo uses 90% recycled aluminium overall, paired with 100% recycled cobalt in the battery.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10208291

What’s old is new: the command line — the original, clunky non-graphical interface for interacting with and controlling PCs, where the user just typed in raw commands in code — has become one of the most important interfaces in agentic AI.

That shift has been driven in part by the rise of coding-native tools such as Claude Code and Kilo CLI, which have helped establish a model where AI agents do not just answer questions in chat windows but execute real tasks through a shared, scriptable interface already familiar to developers — and which can still be found on virtually all PCs.

For developers, the appeal is practical: the CLI is inspectable, composable and easier to control than a patchwork of custom app integrations.

Now, Google Workspace — the umbrella term for Google’s suite of enterprise cloud apps including Drive, Gmail, Calendar, Sheets, Docs, Chat, Admin — is moving into that pattern with a new CLI that lets them access these applications and the data within them directly, without relying on third-party connectors.

The project, googleworkspace/cli, describes itself as “one CLI for all of Google Workspace — built for humans and AI agents,” with structured JSON output and agent-oriented workflows included.

In an X post yesterday, Google Cloud director Addy Osmani introduced the Google Workspace CLI as “built for humans and agents,” adding that it covers “Google Drive, Gmail, Calendar, and every Workspace API.”

While not officially supported by Google, other posts cast the release as a broader turning point for automation and agent access to enterprise productivity software.

Now, instead of having to set up third-party connectors like Zapier to access data and use AI agents to automate work across the Google Workspace suite of apps, enterprise developers (or indie devs and users, for that matter) can easily install the open source (Apache 2.0) Google Workspace CLI from Github and begin setting up automated agentic workflows directly in terminal, asking their AI model to sort email, respond, edit docs and files, and more.

Why the CLI model is gaining traction

For enterprise developers, the importance of the release is not that Google suddenly made Workspace programmable. Workspace APIs have long been available. What changes here is the interface.

Instead of forcing teams to build and maintain separate wrappers around individual APIs, the CLI offers a unified command surface with structured output.

Installation is straightforward — npm install -g @googleworkspace/cli — and the repo says the package includes prebuilt binaries, with releases also available through GitHub.

The repo also says gws reads Google’s Discovery Service at runtime and dynamically builds its command surface, allowing new Workspace API methods to appear without waiting for a manually maintained static tool definition to catch up.

For teams building agents or internal automation, that is a meaningful operational advantage. It reduces glue code, lowers maintenance overhead and makes Workspace easier to treat as a programmable runtime rather than a collection of separate SaaS applications.

What developers and enterprises actually get

The CLI is designed for both direct human use and agent-driven workflows. For developers working in the terminal, the README highlights features such as per-resource help, dry-run previews, schema inspection and auto-pagination.

For agents, the value is clearer still: structured JSON output, reusable commands and built-in skills that let models interact with Workspace data and actions without a custom integration layer.

That creates immediate utility for internal enterprise workflows. Teams can use the tool to list Drive files, create spreadsheets, inspect request and response schemas, send Chat messages and paginate through large result sets from the terminal. The README also says the repo ships more than 100 agent skills, including helpers and curated recipes for Gmail, Drive, Docs, Calendar and Sheets.

That matters because Workspace remains one of the most common systems of record for day-to-day business work. Email, calendars, internal docs, spreadsheets and shared files are often where operational context lives. A CLI that exposes those surfaces through a common, agent-friendly interface makes it easier to build assistants that retrieve information, trigger actions and automate repetitive processes with less bespoke plumbing.

The important caveat: visible, but not officially supported

The social-media response has been enthusiastic, but enterprises should read the repo carefully before treating the project as a formal Google platform commitment.

The README explicitly says: “This is not an officially supported Google product”. It also says the project is under active development and warns users to expect breaking changes as it moves toward v1.0.

That does not diminish the technical relevance of the release. It does, however, shape how enterprise teams should think about adoption. Today, this looks more like a promising developer tool with strong momentum than a production platform that large organizations should standardize on immediately.

This is a cleaner interface, not a governance bypass

The other key point is that the CLI does not bypass the underlying controls that govern Workspace access.

The documentation says users still need a Google Cloud project for OAuth credentials and a Google account with Workspace access. It also outlines multiple authentication patterns for local development, CI and service accounts, along with instructions for enabling APIs and handling setup issues.

For enterprises, that is the right way to interpret the tool. It is not magic access to Gmail, Docs or Sheets. It is a more usable abstraction over the same permissions, scopes and admin controls companies already manage.

Not a rejection of MCP, but a broader agent interface strategy

Some of the early commentary around the tool frames it as a cleaner alternative to Model Context Protocol (MCP)-heavy setups, arguing that CLI-driven execution can avoid wasting context window on large tool definitions. There is some logic to that argument, especially for agent systems that can call shell commands directly and parse JSON responses.

But the repo itself presents a more nuanced picture. It includes a Gemini CLI extension that gives Gemini agents access to gws commands and Workspace agent skills after terminal authentication. It also includes an MCP server mode through gws mcp, exposing Workspace APIs as structured tools for MCP-compatible clients including Claude Desktop, Gemini CLI and VS Code.

The strategic takeaway is not that Google Workspace is choosing CLI instead of MCP. It is that the CLI is emerging as the base interface, with MCP available where it makes sense.

What enterprises should do now

The right near-term move for enterprises is not broad rollout. It is targeted evaluation.

Developer productivity, platform engineering and IT automation teams should test the tool in a sandboxed Workspace environment and identify a narrow set of high-friction use cases where a CLI-first approach could reduce integration work. File discovery, spreadsheet updates, document generation, calendar operations and internal reporting are natural starting points.

Security and identity teams should review authentication patterns early and determine how tightly permissions, scopes and service-account usage can be constrained and monitored. AI platform teams, meanwhile, should compare direct CLI execution against MCP-based approaches in real workflows, focusing on reliability, prompt overhead and operational simplicity.

The broader trend is clear. As agentic software matures, the command line is becoming a common control plane for both developers and AI systems. Google Workspace’s new CLI does not change enterprise automation overnight. But it does make one of the most widely used productivity stacks easier to access through the interface that agent builders increasingly prefer.