Apple’s next major Mac software update may mark the beginning of the end for Intel-powered Macs while also pushing deeper into AI-powered experiences. New rumors surrounding macOS 27 suggest Apple is preparing significant changes ranging from smarter Siri capabilities to refinements for its controversial “Liquid Glass” design language.

According to reports, macOS 27 could become the first version of macOS to substantially reduce or fully end support for Intel-based Macs, completing a transition Apple began in 2020 with the launch of its first Apple Silicon chips. While Apple has steadily shifted focus toward M-series processors over the past several years, macOS 27 may represent the clearest sign yet that the company is ready to leave Intel hardware behind. Although this is not new news – Apple was already looking to phase out Intel-powered Macs when it rolled out macOS Tahoe last year.

The timing would align with Apple’s typical software support cycle. Intel Macs have already started missing out on some Apple Intelligence features introduced during the AI push across iPhones, iPads, and Macs. Ending support entirely would allow Apple to focus more aggressively on AI, machine learning, and hardware-specific optimizations designed around Apple Silicon.

Apple appears ready to fully embrace its AI-first Mac future

One of the biggest rumored changes involves Siri. Reports suggest Apple is continuing work on a significantly smarter version of the assistant capable of handling more natural conversations, contextual awareness, and deeper app integration. While Apple’s AI rollout has faced criticism for moving more slowly than rivals like Google and OpenAI, macOS 27 could become an important part of the company’s broader Apple Intelligence strategy.

The update may also refine Apple’s newer “Liquid Glass” visual style, which reportedly focuses on translucent layers, reflective interface elements, and smoother animations across macOS. Early reactions to the design direction have been mixed, with some users praising the futuristic appearance while others argue it prioritizes aesthetics over clarity and usability.

Apple is also expected to continue integrating AI-powered productivity tools throughout macOS. Features involving summarization, writing assistance, smarter search, and proactive recommendations could become more deeply embedded into the operating system as Apple tries to make AI feel native to the Mac experience instead of functioning as a separate tool.

For users still relying on Intel Macs, however, the rumored support changes may become the biggest story. Millions of Intel-based MacBooks and desktops remain in active use, especially in businesses, schools, and creative industries. If Apple significantly cuts compatibility, many users could face difficult upgrade decisions sooner than expected.

macOS 27 may reveal Apple’s long-term strategy for the Mac

The rumored update reflects a broader shift happening across Apple’s ecosystem. The company increasingly designs software around its own custom chips, allowing tighter integration between hardware and software features. Apple Silicon Macs already deliver major advantages in battery life, performance efficiency, and AI processing compared to older Intel systems.

Ending Intel support would also simplify development for Apple and third-party app makers by reducing the number of architectures they need to support. However, it risks frustrating long-time Mac users whose devices may still feel perfectly functional despite losing future software support.

Apple is expected to officially unveil macOS 27 during WWDC 2026, where the company will likely detail its next-generation AI strategy across Macs, iPhones, and iPads. Until then, many of the reported features remain speculative, but the rumors strongly suggest Apple is preparing one of the most significant transitions in Mac history since the move away from Intel first began.

security

Those receiving aid in the famine-threatened, war-torn territory told support will remain

Humanitarian organization World Food Programme (WFP) says one of its systems was breached, and around 600,000 Gazan households receiving aid had their details improperly accessed.

Its announcement, made via Telegram on May 31, confirmed there was “a security incident” in the self-registration application used by Gazans to register for aid and applicants’ names, ID numbers, phone numbers, and location information were among the data types accessed.

“We understand this may be concerning, and we want to assure you that protecting your data and privacy is our top priority,” the WFP said. “The program is treating this situation with the utmost seriousness and priority.”

The organization said it temporarily suspended the registration platform to urgently apply the necessary security improvements.

Its most recent update on the situation came on June 2, when it said the platform was still down, but added that aid recipients did not need to do anything, while their support would continue to be delivered uninterrupted.

“The WFP wants to assure all those registered via the link that food assistance, cash assistance, nutritional supplementation, and all other WFP programs are continuing as usual,” it said.

“If you are already registered on the Self-Registration Application (SRA), your registration remains valid. There is no need to update, delete, or re-register your information at this time.”

WFP told The New Humanitarian, which first reported the story, that the attack was detected on May 14, and confirmed the scale to be in the region of 600,000 households. 

The news organization also claimed, citing a whistleblower’s account of matters, that an anonymous “independent expert” contacted WFP’s Palestine team, alerting it to vulnerabilities in the SRA two days before the organization detected the breach.

The Register contacted WFP’s Rome headquarters for more details, but it did not immediately respond.

WFP, which is a division of the UN and the largest welfare organization in the world, supports 1.6 million Palestinians every month who face a malnutrition crisis amid fierce conflict between the territory and neighboring Israel.

This represents around 77 percent of the country’s population, and an estimated 80 percent of the population is unemployed, unable to earn the money required to pay for a nutritionally sound diet.

WFP delivers wheat flour, high-energy biscuits, and fortified snacks to families, community kitchens, and bakeries in its effort to push back famine, as well as facilitating cash transfers.

The organization is also helping individuals get back into paid work, maintains roads, and says that when conditions allow, it will stay in the region and help local people rebuild communities, markets, and other food systems. ®

Performance-wise, there’s no pedal-assist or throttle lag, as I’ve experienced on some cheaper ebikes. I thought this would feel unnervingly fast, but the sturdy frame and wide tires are incredibly stable. I felt totally comfortable going fast (for an ebike). I avoided taking corners and tight turns at full speed because the bike is so heavy, but otherwise, I felt self-assured during testing.

With a 505-pound on-bike weight limit, the Nomad 2 has a higher load capacity than other ebikes I’ve tested, particularly folding models. Velotric also advertises a 1,000-pound towing capacity. That number registers impressively high to me, but I haven’t tested the claim. Even so, I’m skeptical of how long the battery would last while towing 1,000 pounds of cargo.

The battery range is pretty standard for a full-size ebike, though impressive for a model of this heft. Velotric advertises a 65-mile range for pedal-assist and 45 miles for throttle, and I appreciate that both ranges are listed. That said, I’ve maxed out at around 37 miles on the throttle and at around 47 miles with pedal assist. To be fair, I’m often riding on hills and bumpy surfaces, which also drains the battery faster. I also enjoy the IPX7 waterproof battery housing, as I’m liable to get caught out in the rain during the shoulder seasons of southwest Montana, where I live. My Rad Powerbike can’t handle rain with its partially enclosed battery, so I’m more likely to take the Velotric out if the weather is iffy.

An Off-Road Delight

Photograph: Maggie Slepian

I tested this bike for commuting purposes on the paved roads of my very suburban town. I also used it off-road on bike paths, gravel, rutted dirt, and in open fields. It worked well in all scenarios. The massive 4-inch Kenda tires, which came perfectly inflated, do a wonderful job absorbing impact while rolling easily over obstacles. I encountered some ruts and ridges that I thought would yield a painful thud, but the bike handled them smoothly.

“A DNA-editing feat involving editing the genes of early stage embryos was announced this week,” reports the Wall Street Journal.

They describe the feat as “a far cry from designer babies, but nevertheless a step in that direction.”

Dieter Egli, an associate professor of developmental cell biology at Columbia University and his co-authors, including Nathan Treff of Nucleus Genomics, a New York-based DNA-testing startup, say the technology could help fix disease-causing mutations in embryos. “We’re not throwing the final ‘OK, you will have gene-edited babies tomorrow’ at the public,” said Egli. “That is a process that can occur through discussion matched with scientific progress….”

Previous gene-editing efforts have often used Crispr, which can cut out parts of the DNA sequence, but the technology can also cause damage if the wrong DNA is targeted or cut out. In 2018, Chinese scientist He Jianku said he used Crispr to tweak DNA in human embryos and was imprisoned for the work. The technology Egli’s group used, called base editing, allows them to target individual DNA letters in sequences more precisely with fewer adverse effects… Egli’s group focused on altering two genes, one that can raise the risk of heart disease and one that is tied to blood disorders like sickle cell disease, and the research showed they were sometimes able to do so successfully, in the same embryo, without damage.

“I am generally supportive of the concept of embryo editing to prevent genetic disease,” said Dr. Paula Amato, a fertility expert at Oregon Health & Science University who wasn’t involved in the research… Base editing has been used in human embryos before, according to peer-reviewed studies. The technology was used to correct a disease-causing mutation and an Alzheimer’s disease-risk gene variant, said Alexis Komor, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biophysics at the University of California, San Diego, who wasn’t involved in the work. “There really is not any unmet medical or clinical need for this, especially from an in vitro fertilization perspective,” Komor said. “Usually what you’ll hear is that they’re doing it just so that you know we can prevent genetic diseases, but there are so many other better ways to do that.”

Using embryo editing to create babies is illegal in the U.S. and many other countries. Scientists have long worried that it is a slippery slope and that the technology could ultimately be used to promote eugenics. Her worry is that “they’re basically building a blueprint” for more ethically problematic forms of embryo editing.
“In my opinion, I think this is a huge no-no,” Komor said. “There’s just no ethical way to use this….”

Nucleus Genomics Chief Executive Kian Sadeghi said his company plans to fund Egli’s further research, building on the new findings. His company sells a polygenic embryo-screening product, which screens prospective parents’ embryos and produces risk scores for their likelihood of developing disease, as well as factors like height, IQ and eye color. The company has said the IQ predictions are limited in accuracy.
The research was published online Monday on a preprint server.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

MSRP $1,299.99

Advertisement

“A poster child of smartphone luxury.”

Pros

• Smooth day-to-day performance
• Privacy display works well
• Excellent stylus experience
• Impressive low-light camera
• Solid build and clean looks
• Charging speed boost is welcome
• Long-term software support
• Secure on-device AI tools

Cons

• No upgrade at battery capacity
• No magnetic wireless charging
• Cameras need some tuning
• Heat and throttling
• AI tricks are still unconvincing
• Pretty expensive
• Privacy Display takes a toll
• Could use better IP rating

Quick review

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is the most complete Android phone I’ve used this year. It doesn’t get there with a single headline feature, though. Instead, it wins the crown by being good at almost everything and then topping it off with its own exclusive set of perks. At $1,300, it’s also undeniably expensive. After four months of using it as my only phone, I don’t think anything else in the Android segment comes close to its breadth. Samsung dropped the titanium frame this time for a lighter, more colorful Armor Aluminum one, and it finally rounded off the corners that used to bite into my palm.

The headline addition is the Privacy Display, baked into the hardware rather than slapped on as a film. It hides the screen from whoever’s sitting next to you. I was skeptical until I used it and got some surprised looks from the people around me. Underneath the glass-and-metal kit sits the customized Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 silicon, which finally pulls level with Apple’s silicon inside iPhones. Whether it’s heavy multitasking, on-device AI through Gemini, or camera capture, all of it ran without a stutter in my time with the phone.

It’s not perfect, though. The battery is still 5,000 mAh, the same as the last few Ultras, and the screen-on time reflects that. It’s respectable, but nothing special. The faster 60W wired charging takes some of the sting out, at least. The cameras get wider apertures and much better low-light results. Futhermore, the Horizon Lock video mode genuinely impressed me, but I still hit the odd exposure wobble and some shutter lag. The bottom line is that the Galaxy S26 Ultra is an unapologetic powerhouse. It won’t drag S25 Ultra owners into an upgrade charm, but for just about everyone else, it’s a masterclass.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra specs: What’s inside this sleek flagship?

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra design and build: A deceptively sleek behemoth

Every smartphone label is chasing titanium these days, so Samsung going back to aluminum reads like a step backward on paper. It isn’t. After living with the Armor Aluminum 2 frame, I’m convinced the swap was the right call. For one, aluminum takes anodization far better than the PVD coating titanium needs, which is why the colors here pop the way they do.

You get Cobalt Violet (the one I tested, and the one Samsung wants you to buy as the signature color this year), Sky Blue, White, Black, and two Samsung-exclusive shades, Silver Shadow and Pink Gold. The other reason is heat. Aluminum dissipates it a lot quicker than titanium. I learned that lesson the hard way with the iPhone 16 Pro.

Paired with the vapor chamber, the aluminum chassis on the Samsung flagship kept the phone from getting toasty under stress, but more on that later. I noticed it most during a marathon evening of editing a trip video on the phone, the kind of workflow that usually leaves a metal phone warm enough to be unpleasant. This one stayed merely warm.

The ergonomics get better. Phew!

Samsung finally fixed my biggest pet peeve about its top-end phones. Those sharp, palm-digging corners are finally gone. The rounded edges on the S26 Ultra are subtle, but it changes how the phone feels in the hand entirely. It feels thinner and easier to manage one-handed, and after a week, I stopped reaching instinctively for a case, which I never did with the last Ultra.

The camera array still juts out about half a centimeter, though, so the phone rocks around on a desk if you tap at it lying flat without a case. That’s the one ergonomic compromise that hasn’t budged in years, and I doubt it’s going to change in the near future due to the ever-upgrading imaging hardware.

Durability and ingress protection

Up front, you’ll find Corning’s Gorilla Armor 2 layer, which mixes in ceramic for better drop resistance and glare reduction. The back is Gorilla Glass Victus 2. I didn’t deliberately drop the phone, because it isn’t mine to destroy, but it picked up exactly zero micro-scratches over a few months of being tossed into bags alongside keys and a charging brick, which is more than I can say for plenty of phones I’ve tested.

One aspect worth flagging is the durability. The Galaxy S26 Ultra holds its IP68 rating, which means it’s good for accidental dips in 1.5m of water for 30 minutes. It’s not the best out there, by the way. A handful of Chinese rivals are already shipping IP69 and IP69K ratings for high-pressure water resistance, which means they can shrug off hot, pressurized jets, not just a dunk in a sink.

The OnePlus 15 is one of those phones, and it pulls off the durability stunt without compromising the looks. Samsung is being conservative. For most people, IP68 is plenty, and the build still feels rock solid in the hand, but it’s a spec sheet line where Samsung is no longer leading the pack.

The S Pen experience

The S Pen lives in the bottom-left corner inside its own silo. It’s a touch thinner this year, with a curved end that sits flush against the new frame. Functionally, however, it hasn’t changed much since Samsung pulled back the Bluetooth tricks. There’s no more air-gesture remote-shutter party trick to enjoy, and it’s worth mourning.

I rarely used it, so I won’t pretend that it’s a huge miss for me. It’s still the best stylus on any phone by a far margin. The latency is effectively zero, and that held up whether I was scribbling notes in a meeting, sketching a rough idea, or nudging a slider in the photo editor where the fine control genuinely matters.

I love the fact that it can kick into action right from the lock screen, offering you a natural canvas for jotting down notes without having to go through the whole fingerprint scan or password input hassle.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra display: Two steps forward, one step back

The screen on the Galaxy S26 Ultra is a gorgeous 6.9-inch flat Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X panel with QHD+ (3120 x 1440 pixels at 500 ppi) resolution and a refresh rate that ramps from 1Hz all the way to 120Hz. Peak HDR brightness hits 2,600 nits, so I never once squinted at it outdoors.

Plus, there’s an anti-reflective Gorilla Armor 2 coating on top. I spent an afternoon shooting and reviewing photos under a harsh midday sun. Ordinarily, that kind of light turns most smartphone screens into mirrors, especially with the dark mode UI. The Galaxy S26 Ultra did a much better job and stayed legible throughout the exercise.

Let’s talk about that Privacy Display

This is the real story of the S26 Ultra. Forget the cheap stick-on privacy films that dilute the image clarity. Samsung built this in at the sub-pixel level, interlacing normal wide-viewing OLED pixels with narrow-beam pixel arrays. The way it works is straightforward in practice, even if the engineering is clever.

As you switch it on, the wide pixels shut off, so anyone peering in from more than 45 degrees off-axis sees a murky near-black panel, while you, looking at it straight, see everything as normal. There are a bunch of granular controls, too. You can leave it on all the time, or pin it to specific triggers, so it kicks in automatically for banking apps, WhatsApp, or just incoming notification pop-ups and nothing else.

In day-to-day use, it was the feature I didn’t know I wanted. On a crowded metro train, I caught myself replying to messages I’d normally have left until I got home, because I was no longer worried about the person packed against my shoulder peeking at them. It’s the rare phone feature that actually changed my behavior rather than just sitting in a settings menu.

It’s not all sunshine and rainbows, though

Privacy Display is a meaningful trick, but Samsung’s choices come with three caveats that I kept noticing. The first is viewing angles. Even with privacy mode off, that interlaced pixel structure leaves the Ultra with slightly narrower natural viewing angles than the cheaper S26 and S26+. You’ll only really see it if you hand the phone to someone and you’re both trying to watch from the side.

The second is contrast. Once you set Privacy Display to Maximum Privacy mode, the brightness output and color contrast take a visible hit. Those signature inky AMOLED blacks start looking a little gray, as a result. It’s a fair loss for the privacy and display convenience, but it is still a trade-off you must learn to live with.

And finally, despite some confusing early claims, this is an 8-bit display leaning on FRC to fake 10-bit color output. Most people will never catch any banding in normal use, and I had to go looking in test gradients to spot it. But on a $1,300 phone in 2026, an 8-bit panel is going to bother the purists, and they’re not wrong to expect more at this price. There’s also no high-frequency PWM dimming, so if you’re sensitive to OLED flicker, low brightness might tire your eyes over a long evening of reading in the dark.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra camera: Legacy preserved with extra oomph

Alright, let’s discuss the soul of the Galaxy S26 Ultra. The quad-camera layout looks familiar, but the aperture and processing changes here add up to real gains, especially after dark. This is also the section where I spent the most time, because cameras are where flagship phones either justify their price or quietly don’t, and Samsung’s Galaxy S Ultra has always marketed itself as the phone you leave the real camera at home for.

Let’s start where it counts, because the 200MP main sensor is doing the heavy lifting on this phone, and Samsung has clearly poured its energy into it. The headline change is the jump to an f/1.4 aperture, up from f/1.7 on the S25 Ultra, and that’s not a marketing number you should glide past. A wider aperture pulls in more light, which matters enormously the moment the sun goes down.

I’ll start with the low-light situation. In the image below, you can see what the camera viewfinder shows your eyes, and what the image sensors actually capture in a dark room:

In good daylight, honestly, the gap between this and last year’s Ultra is hard to see, because there’s plenty of light to go around and Samsung’s processing was already excellent. The 200MP sensor pixel-bins down to a default 12MP shot that’s clean, detailed, and well-saturated. If you switch to the full 200MP mode for a static, well-lit scene, the amount of detail you can crop into is genuinely absurd.

The only trade-off is that the 12MP pixel-binned shots turn out a tad sharper, while the full 200MP clicks are a bit noisy and lose out on finer surface details. Otherwise, with steady hands, the 50MP and 200MP modes can deliver some terrific results. I shot a building facade across a plaza and could pull a legible street sign out of a corner of the frame that I couldn’t even read with my own eyes from where I stood.

Where the f/1.4 lens earns its keep is in the in-between hours. Indoor restaurant lighting, an overcast street at dusk, or a living room lit by a couple of lamps, that’s the territory where last year’s phones started smearing detail and lifting noise, and it’s where the Galaxy S26 Ultra shines. Shadow detail that used to dissolve into mush stays intact, and the phone doesn’t lean as hard on its noise reduction.

Night capture

Samsung loves the word “Nightography,” and I went in ready to roll my eyes at it. I’ll give credit where it’s due, though, because the f/1.4 main lens combined with the new processing produced the cleanest phone night shots I’ve taken on a phone in years. And yeah, it does a noticeably better job than the iPhone 17 Pro, both in terms of color realism and surface details.

City skylines came out cleaner, with the bright points of distant windows staying crisp instead of blooming into colored halos. I took the phone out to shoot a stretch of road lit only by sodium streetlamps, the kind of orange-cast scene that throws off the white balance. The Galaxy S26 Ultra handled it more accurately than I expected, keeping the tarmac a believable gray rather than dunking the whole frame in a warm coat.

On a reasonably dark night outside the city, the dedicated astro mode stacked a long exposure and pulled out a genuinely respectable field of stars, with far less of the smeary, watercolor-sky effect these modes used to produce. It’s not replacing a tripod-mounted mirrorless camera and a fast prime anytime soon, and I wouldn’t pretend otherwise, but as a phone you happen to have in your pocket when the sky is clear, it punches well above its weight class.

Zoom, telephoto, and the 5x macro problem

The two telephoto lenses are where the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s ambition really shows. The 3x lens is the one I reached for most without thinking, because it sits at the natural portrait length, and it renders faces with flattering compression and minimal distortion. The 5x lens is the showpiece, and Samsung pushed its aperture wider this time around, which again pays off after dark.

The phone will push out to 100x Space Zoom, and as always, that mode is a party trick more than a useful tool, fine for reading a far-off sign but a mushy, AI-smoothed mess for anything you’d actually want to keep. I tried my best with long-range clicks of pets and nature, and the surface texture turned out pretty hazy and just messed up.

There is one real catch with the 5x lens, and it’s worth understanding before you buy. To slim the telephoto module down, Samsung went with an ALoP design on the bigger zoom camera. The upside is that you get a gorgeous bokeh effect, the kind of soft background separation that makes portraits truly shine. The downside is that at this range, the phone hunts for focus far more than I’d like.

If you like shooting tight detail shots, a flower, a watch face, a plate of food, you’ll find the 5x backing away from you, and you’ll end up on the main sensor’s macro mode instead. It’s a quirk, not a dealbreaker, but it vexed me in the early days until I adjusted my instincts. Also, the color chemistry of the macro shots is slightly different, leaning towards a warmer color cast, so that’s worth keeping in mind.

The highs, lows, and the stuff that irked me

The front camera lands a wider frame on the Galaxy S26 Ultra, which doesn’t sound like much until you’re squeezing three friends into a frame. Without a selfie stick, that extra bit of width is the difference between everyone fitting and someone losing half their head. Details are good, skin tones are handled well, and the wider field makes it a better travel companion for group shots in front of something you actually want in the background.

On color accuracy, Samsung has finally reined in its old habit of cranking up the saturation way beyond realism. For years, Samsung’s phones would hand you skies that were a little too blue and grass that looked a tad too green. It was flattering at a glance but not realistic. This year, skin tones and white balance stayed accurate across all kinds of lighting in my shots. It’s a more grown-up and mature look, and I prefer it.

Now, on to the less flattering parts. In tricky high-contrast scenes, exposure sometimes drifted between back-to-back shots, so I’d fire off three frames of the same subject and find one noticeably brighter than the others for no obvious reason. More frustrating is the low-light shutter lag. Below a certain threshold, there’s a real 0.5 to 1.5 second capture delay, and it cost me a couple of shots of a moving subject I’d genuinely have liked to keep.

The feature I keep showing people, though, is Super Steady Horizon Lock. It leans on the gyroscope and EIS, letting you spin the phone a full 360 degrees while recording, and the horizon just stays put. It’s uncanny. I moved the phone around like a waving soccer fan in my kitchen to test its limits, and the footage came back looking like it was shot on a gimbal. It went meaningfully further than Apple’s Action Mode in my side-by-side comparison. For anyone shooting handheld action, a kid’s football match, a bike ride, or a concert, it’s the kind of perk that turns unusable footage into something you’d actually post.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra performance: Fast and hot

The Galaxy S26 Ultra draws power from the customized Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy silicon. It’s based on the 3nm process, tagging alongside fast UFS 4.0 storage and either 12GB or 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM to go with it. There’s a lot of performance headroom here, and in normal use I never came close to running out of it.

Apps snap open, the camera is ready the instant I raise the phone, and I never once watched it stutter while switching between a dozen open apps. Android chips have trailed Apple on raw core performance for years, and the gap was the stick Apple fans loved to beat Android with. The Oryon V3 cores in the Elite Gen 5 close that gap, and it reflects in the Geekbench benchmark scores.

There’s a bigger vapor chamber in here this time, and the phone never got uncomfortably hot while I used it. Games such as Zenless Zone Zero and Diablo Immortal worked without any stutters. The trade-off is how it gets to the performance summit. As I pushed it hard with titles like Genshin Impact, the throttling became visible with lowered FPS output, all done to keep the surface cool.

You can see it in the numbers. The phone posts a chart-topping tally on the demanding 3DMark tests, and then drops aggressively down to nearly half its peak performance after a sustained 20-minute run. Even throttled, that ties the iPhone’s sustained score and leaves the Pixel 10 Pro XL far behind.

Running the CPU throttle test, the phone fared even worse in terms of sustained performance drop. I have seen devices like the Red Magic 11 Pro fare much better. In practice, that means a long gaming session gets a little less smooth after the first twenty minutes, but never to the point where it becomes annoying or drops too many frames to ruin the experience.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra software: Loaded with AI

The Galaxy S26 Ultra ships running Android 16 with One UI 8.5 layer on top. Notably, Samsung is matching Google’s seven years of major OS and security updates promises, which carry the phone through to 2033. That’s a long tail of support, and it’s a huge reassurance if you’re a person who sticks with their phone until it falls apart.

Before we dig into the AI side of the debate, One UI itself isn’t bad. Far from it. DeX is still one of the best implementations of a desktop-like work environment bundled with an Android phone. Moreover, Good Lock offers the deepest level of customization on a smartphone without having to flash a ROM or install sketchy apps. The design is familiar, but after seeing the same familiar UI for years, it could use some jazzing up at this point in time.

The AI ecosystem

There are a lot of AI engines stacked on top of each other here. It can feel like too much at first, and there’s a real argument that Samsung has thrown everything at the wall to see what sticks. Once you figure out where everything lives, though, you can get some genuine utility out of it. The most interesting piece is agentic AI through Gemini. It doesn’t just answer you. Instead, it can go act inside third-party apps, ordering your usual off DoorDash or booking an airport Uber.

It’s still a beta experience, and it shows. It’s slow, and you often have to sit and watch it tap through the app before it hands you a final confirm button, which rather defeats the point of automation. Still, you can see where this is all going, and it’s the first time I’ve used a phone feature that felt like a preview of the next few years rather than a gimmick of this one.

Bixby, meanwhile, isn’t just an alarm-setter anymore. Samsung wired in Perplexity, so it can field genuinely complex real-time questions and cite where the answers came from, which makes it actually trustworthy in a way Bixby never has been.

The Photo Assist and Creative Studio tools let you tweak a photo, recolor a shirt, or sketch something rough with the S Pen and have the AI turn it into a watercolor, a 3D render, or an oil painting. They’re fun, occasionally useful, and exactly the sort of thing you’ll show someone once and then forget about. But they also tend to misfire, as you can see in the sample images below.

The misfires

Samsung is pushing the Galaxy S26 Ultra as an AI-native phone, and as such, it has crammed it into nearly every corner of the software experience, but not all of it works. Now Brief stacks weather, calendar, and news into a lock-screen widget, but I never got more out of it than the widgets we’ve already had for a decade.

Now Nudge is supposed to read what’s on your screen and react, spotting a text about dinner and offering a Maps link, among other such helpful cues. In my testing, it almost never fired when I actually wanted it, and when it did, the suggestion was usually something I’d already thought of.

There’s one smart privacy touch worth a mention, and that’s local AI processing. If you don’t want any of your personal data to go to the cloud, you can enable it to handle AI tasks on-device. You lose some of the heavier generative features, of course, but your data stays put and I appreciate that Samsung made it prominently accessible rather than burying the choice.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra battery life and charging: Stagnant, but reliable

Capacity and screen-on time

If there’s one soft spot on the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s stacked specs sheet, it’s the battery. Samsung has maximized the peak capacity at 5,000 mAh for yet another year. Rivals are out there are shipping silicon-carbon cells up to 8,000 mAh as the mainstream now, while Samsung sits tight. I understand the caution, but a competitor managing 40% more capacity in a similar footprint makes the decision a tad harder to defend.

The 3nm chip and LTPO panel are efficient enough that battery life doesn’t tank midway through a day. It’s just not the class leader anymore. On a heavy day of 5G, gaming, and GPS usage, I averaged 5 to 6 hours of screen-on time, which meant charging every night without fail. On more moderate days, I landed closer to eight hours of screen-on time in standard testing, which is solid. The number that stings is the video streaming rundown. Simply put, if endurance is your single most important spec, the Ultra is no longer the phone to beat.

Charging speeds and MagSafe omissions

To make up for a stagnant battery capacity situation, charging got a lot quicker, and this is where Samsung genuinely improved things. Wired charging now runs at 60W, up from 45W. In practice, I hit 75% in about half an hour, and a full charge took around 54 minutes. That’s quick enough that a ten-minute top-up before heading out actually buys you meaningful hours. Wireless charging is bumped to 25W on the Qi 2.2 standard, which is fairly standard.

But here’s the catch, and it’s a baffling one. Even though it supports Qi2 speeds, Samsung didn’t put the magnetic ring in the back of the phone. So if you want that satisfying magnetic snap, the MagSafe or Pixel Snap experience where the charger or accessory just clicks into place, you have to go buy a specific magnet-equipped case. On a $1,300 phone, that’s just annoying, and it’s the kind of small omission that nags at you every time you fumble a wireless charger and struggle with aligning the charging coil.

Should you buy the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Galaxy S26 Ultra doesn’t reinvent anything. What it does is take the established Ultra formula and tighten every screw. An improved Armor Aluminum frame, a faster Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 finally drawing level with Apple, and that genuinely clever Privacy Display push the device forward in ways that matter.

Sure, the 5,000 mAh battery feels dated in 2026, the AI tricks are still a bit meh, and skipping native magnetic charging is baffling. But after spending months with the phone, none of that outweighed how much it simply does. It has the best stylus on any phone, a quad-camera system that’s now pretty strong in low light, and a beautiful, glare-resistant display. It’s still the phone to beat for power users. If you want one device that does everything, this is the one to get.

Why not try

If $1,300 stings, or the Ultra’s specific trade-offs don’t line up with how you live, here are three other options you can consider:

1. Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — The best for ecosystem loyalists and battery life warriors. It’s the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s natural rival at roughly the same price. On the downside, it skips the stylus, misses out on true 10x zoom. To its credit, it crushes the Samsung phone on battery mileage, and it’s still the safest bet for point-and-shoot video. Moroever, nothing touches it if you already own a Mac, iPad, or Apple Watch.
2. Google Pixel 10 Pro XL — An obvious pick for clean software and effortless photography. It’s also cheaper, and it runs Google’s pure, bloat-free Android experience. The Tensor G5 won’t quite keep up in terms of raw performance, but the Pixel still pulls ahead on plain old still photography. It’s also got built-in magnetic charging via Pixel Snap, which is pretty convenient.
3. Samsung Galaxy S26+ — Best for the majority who want flagship muscle for less. If the S Pen, the 200MP camera, the 5x zoom, and the Privacy Display all leave you cold, the S26+ is a smart buy. From $1,100 you get the same fast Snapdragon, the same seven-year update promise, and a near-identical design in a lighter body, with $200 still in your pocket, a seven-year update promise, and a near-identical design in a lighter body, with $200 still in your pocket.

How we tested

I got my hands on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra in its launch week, and over the course of the past four months, I have used it as my primary phone. I have traveled with it extensively, keeping it hooked to a 5G network and even using it as an on-the-go hotspot device for an extended spell.

As far as testing goes, the performance tests were conducted on two separate occasions, with vastly different ambient weather to get a clear picture of how it handles heat build-up and dissipation. Cameras were tested across four cities in different lighting conditions throughout the day.

On the software side, the phone was running One UI 8.5 stable build. At the time of writing this review, there were 140 apps running on the phone, which included third-party applications as well as those that came pre-installed on the phone. All testing was done with the device running in its native performance state.

Reid Hoffman is stepping down from Microsoft‘s board of directors after nearly a decade. The company disclosed the departure in a regulatory filing on Thursday. Hoffman said he wants to go “founder mode” with Manus, his AI-powered drug discovery startup.

Hoffman joined the board in 2016 after Microsoft bought his company LinkedIn for $26.2 billion. His tenure overlapped with some of the most consequential AI deals in the company’s history. He was a board member when Microsoft invested its first $1 billion into OpenAI in 2019, a bet that reshaped the company’s trajectory.

Hoffman was also one of OpenAI’s original investors and served on that company’s board until 2023. He stepped down citing too many potential conflicts of interest. Those conflicts multiplied further when Microsoft struck a $650 million acqui-hire deal with Inflection AI, the AI startup Hoffman co-founded.

That deal brought Inflection co-founder Mustafa Suleyman into Microsoft, where he now leads a narrower AI division focused on superintelligence. It also raised regulatory questions about conflicts on Big Tech boards.

Hoffman’s next chapter is Manus, a drug discovery company he co-founded. The startup has raised over $50 million across two seed rounds, with backing from General Catalyst. Its CEO is Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee, a physician, biologist, and Pulitzer Prize-winning author of “The Emperor of All Maladies.”

Hoffman holds the title of co-founder and chairman, not CEO. But he signalled on a recent episode of his “Possible” podcast that he plans to be far more hands-on.

“One of the things I realized over the last month was that, we’re seeing such progress with Manus. I need to get back to founder mode,” he told Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella during the conversation.

Hoffman said Manus is making progress on what he calls “Move 37” AI. The term refers to AI that supersedes human creativity, borrowed from AlphaGo’s famous move against world champion Lee Sedol. He believes the concept applies to chemistry, particularly in discovering novel compounds to combat cancer.

The departure comes as AI drug discovery heats up across the industry. ByteDance’s Anew Labs recently presented its first AI-designed therapy, and Google DeepMind’s Isomorphic Labs has AI-designed drug candidates entering clinical trials.

Computex 2026 is over, and as usual, the show floor was packed with more laptops, PCs, components, peripherals, and oddball gadgets than any one person could properly process in a few days. There were sleek ultrabooks, massive gaming rigs, AI PCs, experimental designs, and plenty of products that looked like they were built mainly to make people stop and stare.

A handful of products stayed on our minds long after we left the show floor. They weren’t always the most practical, powerful, or important announcements, but each had something memorable about it. So, in no particular order, here are the coolest things we saw at Computex 2026.

ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BN98 Pro Wi-Fi router

The ASUS ROG Rapture GT-BN98 Pro immediately caught our attention on the show floor. It looks absolutely wild, with a spider-like design that feels more like a sci-fi gaming prop than a router you would place next to your setup.

Once you get past the spider-like design, the bigger surprise is that this is already a Wi-Fi 8 router. That sounds slightly unreal considering most households still rely on Wi-Fi 6 or even Wi-Fi 5, while Wi-Fi 7 remains a relatively premium upgrade. Instead of chasing higher throughput speeds, Wi-Fi 8 focuses more on connection reliability and efficiency.

It has Adaptive QoE for intelligent traffic prioritization, Wi-Fi Insight for real-time network monitoring, AI Game Boost, and dual 10G ports. Do most people need a Wi-Fi 8 router right now? Probably not. But as a piece of future-facing gaming hardware, it was hard to ignore.

Pulsar Feinmann F01 Noctua Edition mouse

The Pulsar Feinmann F01 Noctua Edition is exactly the kind of thing that makes Computex fun. It is a gaming mouse with a tiny Noctua fan built into it, which sounds ridiculous at first, but makes much more sense when you actually try it.

The mouse was shown earlier, but after delays, it now appears much closer to launch. It is based on Pulsar’s Feinmann F01, but weighs slightly more due to the added Noctua NF-A4x10 5V PWM fan. It has a 42,000 DPI sensor and 8K polling. The fan can spin at up to 5,000 RPM, but because it is so small, its noise is hardly noticeable. It blows a gentle breeze toward your palm to help keep your hand from getting sweaty during long gaming sessions.

When it was first revealed last year, we thought the gimmick was pretty cute. After trying it in person, though, the idea started to make a lot more sense. Anyone who has spent hours gaming with sweaty hands will immediately understand the problem Noctua is trying to solve. It is definitely a little unusual, but we can see the practical appeal. That said, we only had a short time with the mouse on the show floor, so we did not get the chance to properly test how effective it is over a long gaming session or in a warm room where sweaty hands would really put the concept to the test.

Noctua also had its first liquid cooling AIO on display, and we saw a demo from the brand. It looks like a worthwhile AIO to keep an eye on for PC builders and Noctua fans who want to bring liquid cooling into their brown-and-beige themed setups.

Alienware AW3926QW monitor

Alienware’s AW3926QW was one of the more polished showpieces at Computex. It is a 39-inch curved Tandem OLED monitor, and at $1,099, it is obviously not cheap. But considering the size, 5K2K resolution, and RGB stripe OLED technology, the price starts to sound a little less outrageous.

The RGB stripe layout improves text clarity and color performance compared with some older OLED monitor layouts. The monitor runs at 5120 x 2160 with a 165Hz refresh rate, but it also has a dedicated mode for competitive players. You can switch it into a 27-inch mode with black bars, dropping the resolution to 2560 x 1080 and pushing the refresh rate up to 330Hz.

That basically makes the monitor a jack of all trades. You can use it as a large, immersive curved display for cinematic gaming or productivity, then switch to a faster esports-focused screen when needed. It also looked great in person without being too flashy.

Gigabyte X870E AORUS INFINITY NEXT motherboard

It is Gigabyte’s 40th anniversary, so we expected the brand to do something special for the occasion. However, we were not prepared for the brand to turn the engineering madness up to eleven with the X870E AORUS INFINITY NEXT motherboard.

It immediately grabbed our attention with its almost biological-looking hollow structures. We soon discovered that this is not just a cosmetic choice, but something far more bizarre. These “gyroid” structures are actually heatsinks, created using advanced 3D metal printing and “thruster-grade thermal materials” to cool the components and VRMs of the motherboard in low Earth orbit.

Yes, you read that right. This motherboard is meant to function in space. Since there is no airflow available to wick heat away from the components in those conditions, these structures are Gigabyte’s solution to the problem. The brand has also 3D-printed a vapor chamber for the chipset and added a honeycomb-style metal backplate to push cooling to the extreme.

Then there is the power delivery. This thing has 64 power phases and uses Low Earth Orbit and data center-grade Quad OptiMOS technology to deliver up to 5,120 amps of total current. That is beyond overkill for a gaming PC, and honestly, we think Gigabyte made this motherboard just to show that it can.

Gigabyte did not say when or if it plans to launch this motherboard to market. However, we did learn that manufacturing it alone costs about $3,000, so even if it ever does go on sale, it will be extremely expensive.

Framework Laptop 13 Pro

The Framework Laptop 13 Pro was announced a few months back, and we were eager to get our hands on the laptop to see if it actually delivers on its advertised promises, and it did not disappoint. The first thing that stood out to us is how sturdy the laptop felt. The brand has taken a page out of Apple’s playbook and used an aluminium unibody chassis in the 13 Pro.

The latch has also been improved so removing or plugging in the expansion cards can be done with one hand, which is a good quality-of-life change. Framework has also moved to LPCAMM2 memory on the Laptop 13 Pro, allowing it to use LPDDR5x while still keeping memory upgradeable. This is significant because laptops that use LPDDR memory are typically not upgradeable.

It has a 13.5-inch display with 2.8K resolution that finally offers touch support, though the laptop can only bend backward up to 180 degrees, so it can’t be flipped into a tablet. The other big upgrade is the 74Wh battery, which is 22% larger than the previous generation, with the brand claiming more than 20 hours of Netflix 4K streaming. We could not verify that claim during our brief hands-on time.

That said, the Framework Laptop 13 Pro is not cheap. The pre-built model starts at $1,499 with an Intel Core Ultra 5 325 processor, so there is an upfront premium. But that price is easier to accept because this is a laptop you can upgrade over time rather than replace entirely.