Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
The conversation at this year’s NY Tech Week is about AI. The panels, the pitch decks, the happy hours: agents that code, agents that sell, infrastructure for the agents. Then a screen mounted to a truck shows a man sitting on a toilet, staring at his phone in open panic.
The line underneath: “His prospect just asked for SOC 2.”
The ad belongs to Scytale, an AI GRC platform that took over the streets of New York this week, running billboards, street screens and an LED truck through the same blocks where founders and investors were converging for Tech Week. While many NY Tech Week companies are looking many years out, Scytale built its campaign around a feeling founders know now: the moment a deal that looked closed turns out to depend on a security audit that nobody started.
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is the security compliance framework that tells enterprise buyers one thing clearly: this company can be trusted with your data. For SaaS companies today, it’s less a nice-to-have and more a ticket to the table. For years it lived in the fine print of enterprise procurement cycles, a box ticked late in the process by companies big enough to have a compliance team.
That timeline has collapsed. Security reviews now sit at the front of the buying process, and buyers ask for a SOC 2 attestation report the way they ask for pricing. Surveys across the compliance industry put the share of enterprise buyers requiring SOC 2 from their software vendors at over 80 percent, and roughly a third of vendors report losing deals over a missing report.
The founders this hits hardest for are the ones selling upmarket for the first time. A seed-stage company lands a meeting with an enterprise buyer, the demo goes well, the champion is sold. Then procurement sends a security questionnaire with 200 questions, and question one asks for a current SOC 2 Type II report. The audit takes months. The buyer’s timeline doesn’t.
“We see it constantly,” says Meiran Galis, CEO and founder of Scytale, who spent years as a security compliance manager at EY before starting the company. “A founder spends six months getting a deal to the finish line, and the deal dies in security review. Nothing was wrong with the product. They were three months of audit work away from the signature, and they found out at the worst possible time.”
The founders filling Tech Week’s AI sessions this week are the campaign’s exact audience, and most of them have a compliance problem coming that nobody on stage is discussing.
AI startups touch more sensitive data than any previous generation of software companies, and they sell into enterprises earlier. A two-year-old AI company today negotiates with Fortune 500 procurement teams that a SaaS startup in 2018 wouldn’t have met until Series C. Those buyers respond to the data exposure by tightening security review, and new frameworks keep arriving behind SOC 2: ISO 42001, the standard for AI governance, is showing up in questionnaires barely a year after auditors began certifying against it.
The campaign image works because the panic is specific. The man on the toilet isn’t worried about competition or runway. He’s freaking out because his prospect just asked him for SOC 2, and he doesn’t have it. That’s it, he knows at that moment that he might be totally screwed, and could very likely lose the deal. He should have seen this coming. He should have started the process already. Scytale says the creative came from listening to founders describe the moment they learned what SOC 2 was. “No one discovers compliance at a good time. You discover it mid-deal, in an email, with money on the table. We wanted the ad to capture how that feels rather than explain what we sell.”
Scytale’s advice to founders at Tech Week is to treat compliance the way they treat hiring: a thing you start before you need it. “Compliance has moved from a post-deal checkbox to a pre-deal asset. The companies that close enterprise deals fastest are the ones that can answer the security questionnaire the same day it arrives.”
Compliance used to be an enterprise problem. Now the security questionnaire arrives with a startup’s first serious deal, and the gap between the companies that prepared and the companies that didn’t is measured in lost quarters.
That makes the toilet billboard a decent litmus test. Some founders at Tech Week will see it and laugh. Some will see it and feel their stomach drop, because they have a deal in security review right now. The difference between the two groups is whether they saw the question coming.
Across the industry, companies are starting to balk at the price of AI. Uber blew through its entire 2026 AI coding budget by April. Microsoft revoked its developers’ Claude Code licenses months after enabling them. A Priceline employee told TechCrunch that a routine Cursor contract renewal came back 4-5x more expensive.
Even though per-token prices have fallen, the push for more AI adoption and increasingly autonomous agents have driven token consumption higher and higher. Companies that gorged themselves in early 2025 on all-you-can-eat subscriptions are now scrambling to understand where their money is going, pull back spending, and figure out whether they can salvage some ROI from the wreckage of their budgets.
Meanwhile, a market is forming to meet them there. Startups, established vendors, and a new standards body are all racing to give companies the tools and language to track what they spend.
“Six months ago, I would have a conversation with a customer and it would be all about ‘What can it do? Is it good enough?’” Alexander Embiricos, OpenAI’s head of enterprise, told TechCrunch at an event in New York City this week. “Our conversations are never about that now. Now the conversations are about, ‘hey, we’re spending so much. What visibility do you have? What auditability do you have? What token controls do you have? What is the efficiency of your models?’”
It’s against this backdrop that the Linux Foundation this week unveiled plans for the Tokenomics Foundation, a new standards body that aims to instill the same cost discipline around AI tokens that FinOps did for cloud spend.
“In April and May, I started hearing from companies: ‘Oh my god, we are 3x over our entire 2026 token budget and it’s only April,’” J.R. Storment, executive director of the FinOps Foundation, a project under the Linux Foundation, told TechCrunch. “We started hearing existential crises, and the whole conversation shifted from tokenmaxxing and ‘go fast’ to ‘we need guardrails, how do we control this?’”
The cries heard round the tech world followed fervent demands from CEOs pushing their teams to use the best models and move fast, costs be damned. New models released in November like Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.5, OpenAI’s GPT-5.1, and Google’s Gemini 3 Pro brought significant improvements to agentic tools, which have multiplied consumption. It’s how one company reportedly found itself with a $500 million Claude bill after forgetting to set usage limits for employees.
“It’s like the crack-cocaine epidemic,” said Chris Reed, senior director of IT finance at Priceline, noting the company had begun placing token limits on certain groups. “They let you try it to get you hooked on it, and now you’re kind of beholden to it.”
Vitaly Gordon, CEO of engineering operations platform Faros AI, said he recently spoke to a CTO who told him: “One of my engineers spent $40,000 on tokens last month, and I genuinely don’t know whether I should stop him or should I go and tell everyone else to be like him.“
A March survey by Faros found that among 20,000 developers, output was rising, but so were bugs and rewrites. Jellyfish, an engineering management platform, similarly found engineers who used the most tokens were about twice as productive than those who used AI less, but they spent 10x the number of tokens to get there.
Nicholas Arcolano, head of research at Jellyfish, told TechCrunch via email that expenditure on AI is exploding in large part due to agentic features, with per-developer consumption rising about 18.6x in nine months. All in all, these stats make the productivity case murkier than the spending suggests.
“Whether extreme spend pays off comes down to the ultimate business value of shipped code (e.g. revenue), which most companies still can’t measure,” Arcolano said.
At least some of that measurement issue is the sheer scale at which AI is being used today.
“Tracking cloud costs is a hundreds-of-millions-of-rows-a-month data problem,” Storment said. “Tracking token costs is a trillions-of-rows-a-month data problem. You can’t just stick that into whatever spreadsheet or even basic tool. You’ve got to fundamentally rethink your tooling, your specs and your accounting systems to do that.”
At Priceline, Reed is already seeing discrepancies. He noted issues between a vendor’s reported usage and Priceline’s internal data.
“I started my career in telecom expense management, and I’m seeing all the same parallels, from telecom to cloud to AI,” he said. “Anytime you introduce something new, it’s ripe for billing errors and audit and optimization opportunities.”
A market is beginning to form around this problem. There are the pure-play companies, like Pay-i, which tracks, measures and optimizes the costs and performance of GenAI investments. Paid, meanwhile, lets developers track costs, measure usage and bill users based on actual value rather than subscription fees.
Then there are companies like Jellyfish, Waydev and Faros AI, which all provide AI agent monitoring to prove the ROI of developer tools. Storment says most of the 180 vendors within the FinOps Foundation are leaning towards this space.
Companies with existing distribution are also adding new features to capitalize on this new market. Ramp has recently moved into AI spend management; Datadog and New Relic have tacked on services like cloud cost management, token-level observability, and GPU monitoring. At the FinOps X conference next week, AWS is expected to introduce new financial management features geared toward enterprise AI spending.
Tiffany Luck, a partner at NEA, thinks token efficiency and observability will likely be added in at the “harness or app layer.” She pointed to Factory, a startup that makes AI agents for enterprises, which this week launched a model router that automatically picks the right model for every task.
Gordon expects frontier labs and other model providers to adopt OpenRouter-style optimization to drive queries to the cheapest models — a trend already showing up on enterprise Claude bills.
“The financial report for how much you spend on Anthropic, even if you call the Opus model, some of the spend will be on Sonnet or Haiku, because they are smart enough to do it,” Gordan said. “I think this will become more and more of a thing.”
But all these tools are being built without a common language or shared definitions for how much a token costs, what it produces, and how to compare spend across vendors. That’s where the Tokenomics Foundation hopes to prove useful.
The Foundation is building a canonical definition and framework for “tokenomics;” open standards, specifications and metrics for AI token usage and billing; as well as new metrics for AI economics, like cost-per-intelligence or tokens-per-watt. It also plans to define metrics across token factory effectiveness and consumption efficiency. The group is planning a formal launch in July, and is about to announce more members at the FinOps X conference next week.
“Token economics is fundamentally more abstract and opaque than anything we’ve managed at this scale before,” Nishant Gupta, chief availability officer at Salesforce, said in a statement. “It requires a different operational muscle than the one the industry built for cloud.”
That said, Goldman Sachs projects global token usage to multiply by 24 times by 2030. The companies already over budget need solutions now, and the foundation’s first deliverable is still months away.
“Maybe we created a steam engine, but we still haven’t figured out the assembly line,” said Gordon.
According to Arcolano, the smart move is broad, moderate adoption.
“The best ROI comes from moving the broad middle from low to moderate usage, not pushing heavy users higher,” he said.
Russell Brandom and Tim Fernholz contributed to this reporting.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
Over 900 automatic tank gauge (ATG) systems across the United States, used to monitor fuel and chemical storage tanks across various critical infrastructure sectors, have been found exposed online and are vulnerable to ongoing attacks.
ATG systems are electronic monitoring devices used to remotely track fuel, chemicals, or other liquids in storage tanks, automating inventory control, environmental leak detection, and regulatory compliance. While they’re commonly used at gas stations to monitor fuel tank levels, they can also be found in industrial settings to track chemical storage tanks.
On Tuesday, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the FBI, the NSA, the Department of Energy, and other U.S. government partners issued a joint advisory warning critical infrastructure organizations to secure internet-exposed ATG systems against ongoing attacks.
The federal agencies warned that threat actors target such devices to alter system settings in command execution attacks after exploiting various security flaws, including hardcoded credentials, authentication bypasses, SQL injection vulnerabilities, OS command execution flaws, and privilege escalation weaknesses.
“The recent malicious cyber activity observed by the authoring organizations—which the U.S. government has not yet attributed to a nation-state or threat actor group—involves cyber threat actors compromising internet-exposed ATG systems and subsequently modifying them through command execution,” the joint advisory warned.
As CISA cautioned, following successful compromises, the attackers could disable system alerts, increasing the risk of leaks or equipment failures and even causing permanent damage to the targeted tank systems.
In light of CISA’s advisory, Internet security watchdog Shadowserver warned today that over 1,000 ATG systems were exposed online, with the vast majority (909 devices) in the United States.

”We added scanning of Automatic Tank Gauge (ATG) systems to our Accessible ICS reporting with 1061 IPs seen on 2026-06-05 (on port 10001/tcp),” Shadowserver said. “This is after weeding out vast majority which appear to be honeypots (including ports 8001/9001).”
Critical infrastructure organizations are advised to restrict remote access to ATG systems from the Internet as soon as possible and implement controlled access through firewalls, VPNs, or access control lists.
They should also replace default passwords on vulnerable devices with strong credentials, apply security updates, monitor systems for unauthorized changes, and implement multi-factor authentication where possible.
CISA’s warning comes after a May CNN report that Iranian hackers had breached ATG systems connected to the Internet at multiple gas stations across the United States. Iranian hacking groups were linked to these incidents based on their previous history of targeting fuel management systems and other industrial control technologies.
After hacking the devices with weak or nonexistent passwords, the attackers reportedly manipulated the display readings but did not alter the actual fuel levels. Although these incidents didn’t cause any physical damage, they raise concerns that such attacks could hinder automated fuel leak detection and similar safety-related functions.
In April, another joint advisory issued by U.S. federal agencies linked Iranian state-backed hackers to attacks targeting Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley PLC devices since March 2026, causing financial losses and operational disruptions.
Cybersecurity firm Censys reported one day later that 74.6% (3,891 hosts) of such industrial control systems found exposed online globally were from the United States.
Security teams log 54% of successful attacks and alert on just 14%. The rest move through your environment unseen.
The Picus whitepaper shows how breach and attack simulation tests your SIEM and EDR rules so threats stop slipping by detection.
Virtual Private Networks, or VPNs, are basically a required utility in 2026 if you want to browse the internet without being tracked. Get Proton VPN at up to 70% off a two-year subscription.
It seems like everyone on the internet is trying to track you. Whether it’s data brokers trying to profit off your personal information or your ISP attempting to help build an advertising profile, all eyes are on you when you browse.
There is a better option than giving up and living in a cave, and it’s called Proton VPN. It lets you connect a VPN to up to ten devices at once for smooth and encrypted access to your apps and websites.
Those of you already in the know about Proton VPN, a safe and secure option, can go ahead and jump on the deals available this month. Get up to 50% off monthly subscriptions, 60% off a 1-year subscription, or 70% off a 2-year subscription now through July 19.
For those that need a little convincing, here’s what you need to know about one of the best VPN options out there.
Proton VPN is a Virtual Private Network tool that easily tunnels your internet traffic from one server to another. All data is encrypted with AES-256 or ChaCha20 coding to ensure your traffic can’t be deciphered even if it’s checked.
Basically, it means no one can see what websites you’re visiting, how long you spend there, what you click on, or what you’re watching. VPNs enable a lot of cool abilities on every device you install them on.
For example, if you use Proton VPN for iPhone, you can stream anime on Netflix that is exclusive to Japan. Or, if you’d like to visit a website that’s being censored in your region, a VPN will let you get by without worry.
Keep in mind that accessing illegal content or performing actions like pirating media is still punishable by law, even when using a VPN. That said, everyone can benefit from a little more privacy and security online.
Proton VPN has a strict no-logs policy, so what little data that can be gathered about your browsing habits isn’t even available to the VPN provider. Subpoenas sent to Proton VPN will only be able to reveal that a customer purchased access to a VPN, and that’s it.
Simply sign up for your subscription, install Proton VPN on your devices, and choose the location you’d like to browse from. There are additional options like double hop and split tunneling to further obfuscate your VPN use.
Proton’s 20,332 servers in 148 countries ensure your VPN connection is always stable with unlimited bandwidth. Browsing the web shouldn’t be a compromised experience just because you’re using a tool like Proton VPN for Mac.
Staying hidden from ad tracking and creepy ISP spying is only one aspect of VPN use — they can also help keep you more secure. If you’re ever trying to access the internet over public Wi-Fi, toggle on Proton VPN to stay out of sight of bad actors and other problems.
Proton VPN also has a proprietary accelerator that can increase your VPN connection speed by up to 400%. Gamers get significant speed gains too, as some ISPs throttle gaming traffic during peak hours.
If you’re looking for the best VPN for iPhone, iPad, Mac, or other device in your home, Proton VPN is an excellent option.
All you need is an active subscription and the VPN app to secure your network connection and browse more privately. Pick your subscription length and jump right in.
Proton VPN is offering 50% off monthly subscriptions, 60% off a 1-year subscription, and 70% off a 2-year subscription. Just go to Proton VPN’s website and sign up to take advantage of the deal before July 19.
The UK is now among the most targeted countries in the world for cyberattacks. Last year, the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) handled a record 204 ‘nationally significant’ cyber attacks, a steep 130% increase on the previous 12 months.
Public sector organizations are increasingly in the firing line when it comes to cybersecurity incidents. In December 2025, Kensington and Chelsea Council was hit by a cyberattack that compromised the personal information of hundreds of thousands of residents.
This included sensitive data that could increase residents’ exposure to fraud and social engineering.
Senior Director of Solutions Engineering at HackerOne.
These incidents are not one-offs either. As geopolitical tensions rise, state-backed cyber campaigns are becoming more prevalent alongside financially motivated criminal groups. Many of these operations target identity systems and cloud collaboration tools, which are critical entry points to government networks and sensitive data.
This growing threat is being compounded by structural challenges within the public sector itself. Public sector organizations often face challenges upgrading and keeping pace with ever-changing technology, with many still reliant on legacy systems. Limited budgets for modern defenses, employee training and security staff further increase exposure.
These challenges are particularly pronounced at the local authority level. Many UK councils share technology stacks, suppliers and IT infrastructure, meaning a successful attack can be replicated or even pivot across multiple organizations operating in similar environments.
Recognizing the scale of the challenge, the UK government is on a mission to improve national cyber resilience. Through the NCSC, it is working across both the public and private sector to improve defensive posture – collaborating with local authorities, businesses and operators of critical national infrastructure.
The government has also announced a £210 million investment aimed at bolstering public sector cyber defense – a clear sign that protecting digital services is no longer optional.
The stakes are high and traditional internet security approaches are struggling to keep pace with an expanding threat landscape.
There are various solutions to help organizations strengthen their defenses, and many public sector organizations are adopting continuous threat exposure management (CTEM) approaches. It’s focused on continuously identifying, validating and reducing real-world risk across their attack surface.
This shift reflects a move away from point-in-time testing toward continuous, evidence-based security validation. By combining AI-driven automation with expert-led validation, organizations can continuously assess complex environments with greater depth and accuracy than traditional approaches alone. This includes specialists with experience in emerging areas such as AI model security and data privacy.
Rather than relying purely on automated scanning tools or periodic assessments, modern approaches introduce adversarial validation, which tests systems in ways that reflect how real attackers behave. This helps uncover complex vulnerabilities and attack paths that traditional methods may overlook.
This continuous validation reduces the window of exposure by identifying and confirming exploitable vulnerabilities faster, enabling organizations to respond before they can be exploited. Organizations can scale these capabilities as needed, whether assessing new applications or maintaining continuous visibility across critical systems.
Crucially, this approach provides measurable insight into security effectiveness. By focusing on validated vulnerabilities and real-world exploitability, security leaders can prioritize remediation efforts and demonstrate meaningful risk reduction to executives and boards. Frameworks such as Return on Mitigation (RoM) offer a structured way to quantify the tangible impact of these programs.
These approaches are becoming increasingly relevant as cybercrime continues to grow in scale and sophistication. Many organizations now find themselves under sustained pressure from well-organized threat actors, particularly where ageing infrastructure, limited security resources, and constrained budgets create exploitable gaps. For public sector institutions responsible for safeguarding large volumes of sensitive data, these pressures can be especially acute.
Operationalizing CTEM requires a structured, platform-driven approach. Security leaders must first define scope. Identifying critical systems, assets, and services, and aligning efforts to measurable risk-reduction outcomes. From there, organizations can integrate continuous discovery and validation into a unified workflow that combines automated testing with expert-led assessment.
As validated findings are surfaced, teams can prioritize remediation based on exploitability and business impact, ensuring resources are focused on exposures that matter most. Over time, this creates a continuous feedback loop that strengthens overall security posture.
In environments such as local government, where councils often rely on shared suppliers and similar technology stacks, this model also enables more coordinated approaches. This includes cross-authority threat intelligence, joint exercises, and shared testing methodologies that reduce duplication while raising resilience across the board.
For CTEM to succeed in government environments, strong operational guardrails are essential. This includes clear authorization, well-defined scope, prioritization frameworks, and remediation processes that can scale without overwhelming already stretched teams. Without these foundations, increased visibility can risk adding to existing backlogs rather than reducing them.
As public services become increasingly digital, the priority for governments lies in quickly expanding their security capabilities. Moving to continuous, validated exposure management enables governments not only to find vulnerabilities, but to prove what is exploitable, prioritize effectively, and reduce risk at scale. All while keeping pace with a threat landscape that is evolving faster than traditional models can manage.
We feature the best software asset management (SAM) tools.
This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.
The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit
OpenAI and Anthropic have battled for workers, customers, and public attention. The rival AI labs have been on opposite sides of policy proposals, and their CEOs were the only ones not to link hands among a dozen industry leaders at a business summit earlier this year. But they do have one big area of overlap: their investors.
About 90 venture capital firms and other money managers have invested in both OpenAI and Anthropic over the past few years, according to a WIRED analysis of data from PitchBook, a platform that tracks startup investments. OpenAI shares about 42 percent of its overall investors with Anthropic, according to the data. Roughly a third of Anthropic investors are also OpenAI backers, including major firms like Sequoia Capital, Greylock, Founders Fund, Redpoint Ventures, Emerson Collective, and Sound Ventures.
Just last week, Anthropic made a fundraising announcement that named 31 investors—at least 13 of which have stakes in OpenAI, according to the PitchBook data and WIRED reporting. The number of common investors may be an undercount, because collecting information about private investments is challenging. WIRED identified at least a couple of investors missing from OpenAI’s roster in the PitchBook data, including Amazon.
The amount of overlap is astonishing for two fierce competitors that began their fundraising within a couple of years of one another. Three experts who study the venture capital industry described the commonality as unusual, or even unprecedented. The phenomenon reflects the recent evolution of the venture capital industry, the emergence of two extraordinary companies that have raised unheard-of sums of money, and the wide-open competition among them and others in AI.
“The ownership structure you are seeing right now is a real insight into how sophisticated investors are viewing this market, and the answer seems to be that few are convinced this will be a winner-take-all market, or if it is, who the dominant player will be,” says Tom Nicholas, a Harvard Business School professor and author of VC: An American History.
The intersection of investors is also notable as Anthropic and OpenAI aim to make their stock market debuts this year. Initial public offerings are often a chance for investors to realize gains in their ownership of a startup. But last year, just two-thirds of IPOs attracted a significant pop in value. With bets in both OpenAI and Anthropic, investors may be doubling their odds of success.
“Rather than looking at these companies as overlapping technologies, what these large investors are doing is protecting their ability to create returns,” says Kyle Stanford, director of venture capital research at PitchBook.
OpenAI and Anthropic didn’t respond to requests for comment. Several venture capital firms that invested in OpenAI and Anthropic also declined or didn’t respond to requests for comment about why they decided to back both.
A few would speak only on the condition of anonymity to avoid jeopardizing industry relationships, and each called the dueling investment opportunities with OpenAI and Anthropic unlike any circumstance they had encountered before.
Historically, venture capital firms have concentrated their bets on one company in an area of competition to avoid conflicts of interest, Stanford says. Companies sometimes share proprietary information with investors or lean on them for advice or governance, and having stakes in rivals invites awkward conversations.
Just when you thought the AI data center boom couldn’t get any crazier, Meta has gone and built data centers in tents. The strategy appears to borrow in equal parts from Tesla and xAI.
In a bid to cut construction time in half, Meta has built six tents — or “rapid deployment structures” as the company describes them — outside of New Albany, Ohio, according to Michael Thomas, founder of Cleanview, which tracks data center deployments.
Thomas’ findings aren’t totally new. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg spoke to The Information last year about his plan to use weatherproof tents to house the company’s multi-gigawatt data centers.
But Thomas’ images and review of local permits showcase the speed of construction and scale of the project. According to city permits reviewed by Thomas, Meta started building five 125,000-square-foot tents between April and June. The satellite images he shared in his post on X show the structures have all been built.
The use of tents is reminiscent of those Tesla built in the parking lot of its Fremont, California factory when it was rushing to roll out the Model 3. The site is also powered by 200 megawatts of modular gas turbines nearby, a tactic popularized by competitor xAI.
Inside the tents, AI chips, likely worth billions of dollars, will go about their business.
The tents have sprung up as Meta has struggled to release its AI models to developers. A recent report in The Wall Street Journal found that Meta’s latest model, Muse Spark, is complete, but the APIs that developers rely on to access it have been repeatedly delayed.
Meta has said it intends to spend up to $145 billion on data centers and other capital expenditures. Wall Street hasn’t liked the sound of that, with Meta’s stock trading down 5% this year. Putting AI chips in tents is one way to trim the bill.
TechCrunch has reached out to Meta for comment and will update this article if it responds.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
databases
SQL Server licenses can now be consumed in the rival cloud’s DBaaS
Microsoft now lets customers apply existing SQL Server licenses toward SQL Server usage on AWS’s managed relational database service (RDS).
The move promises to give customers who decided to go with AWS an easier path to consuming their SQL Server systems as a service, rather than in virtual machines.
In a blog post, Amazon explained that customers paying with Microsoft’s Software Assurance licensing program could only previously bring their SQL Server licenses to AWS on self-managed Amazon EC2 through the Redmond vendor’s License Mobility program.
“If you wanted a fully managed database like Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS), and you already had SQL Server licenses, you had to pay for licensing a second time through the License Included model,” RDS database engineer Srikanth Katakam said.
Amazon’s Bring Your Own Media (BYOM) for RDS for SQL Server lets customers use existing SQL Server Enterprise or Standard Edition licenses to cover both installation media and licensing on the managed service, with no additional fees.
The process includes three steps, Amazon told The Register: customers submit a License Mobility Verification Form to Microsoft to confirm eligibility; they upload their SQL Server Release to Manufacturing media to Amazon S3; and in the Amazon RDS Console, users should select their SQL Server major version, point to the media file in S3, choose their minor version, and create the database.
Customers can track their Microsoft SQL Server license usage with AWS License Manager.
Microsoft has declined to comment on why it got involved in the deal. For Amazon, the self-interest is clear: it wants to get the data nearer to its AI tech.
“Once that operational data is in the cloud, it sits alongside AWS AI and analytics services — so teams can build agentic AI applications that reason directly over their business data without complex data pipelines or infrastructure constraints,” AWS said in a statement.
Microsoft has its own equivalent technology in Fabric, its data lake and analytics environment, which also offers a control console to manage databases.
In the absence of any firm statement from Redmond, it seems reasonable to assume that SQL Server is no longer the strategic priority it once was for the Microsoft. It is inviting users to migrate to its database services, Azure SQL and SQL database in Fabric. Like AWS, users can also choose from a bunch of database services, including those running MySQL and PostgreSQL, which Microsoft has been increasingly vocal about
SQL Server remains third in the DB-Engines ranking, although its popularity has been on the slide for more than five years, and it looks like it will be overtaken by PostgreSQL in the near future.
However that may not be of great concern to Redmond’s accountants. As a database vendor, Microsoft is doing fine.
As Adam Ronthal, vice president analyst at Gartner, pointed out: “Of the leading vendors in 2011 (Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, and SAP), only Microsoft has grown their market share in the last 15 years.” ®

Electronic signature powerhouse Docusign is reportedly moving its offices in downtown Seattle a few blocks north, leaving the tower that bears its name.
The Seattle Times reports that Docusign signed a 115,000 square foot lease at JPMorganChase Center, with plans to move onto multiple floors in the building next to the Seattle Art Museum in the summer of 2027. That’s about the same footprint that Docusign currently holds at Docusign Tower, the former Wells Fargo Center at 999 Third Avenue.
It will join law firm Perkins Coie and real estate juggernaut Zillow in the JPMorganChase Center.
San Francisco-based Docusign moved into its current home in Seattle in 2015, expanding its footprint at the time to 119,000 square feet. It secured naming rights to the building in January 2020 when it took over additional floors and boosted its space 227,000 square feet in the building.
Covid hit that same year, sending teams to remote work locations. DocuSign started to bring workers back to the office more strictly in 2023, but it never needed the same amount of space in Seattle. It cut employees in 2022, and then laid off 10 percent of its workforce in 2023 and another six percent in 2024.
In 2024, Docusign also announced the $165 million acquisition of Seattle startup Lexion, an AI-powered contract management system. Lexion employed more than 100 people, with Docusign saying at the time that the acquisition brought the company “a team of world-class AI engineers.”
According to LinkedIn, Lexion co-founder Gaurav Oberoi serves as DocuSign’s group vice president of product. Other Docusign leaders in Seattle include Chief Financial Officer Blake Grayson and Chief Product Officer Graham Sheldon, who just announced he was joining the company earlier this week after extended stints at UiPath and Microsoft, where he served as a corporate vice president of product for Teams.
Docusign was founded in 2003 in Seattle by Tom Gonser, Court Lorenzini and Eric Ranft.
The company’s latest move is really a homecoming of sorts, at least when it comes to office space. Before moving to its namesake building in 2015, Docusign occupied space at the Russell Investments Center, which is now JPMorganChase Center.
Publicly-traded with a market valuation of nearly $10 billion, Docusign on Thursday reported first quarter revenue of $830.2 million, a nine percent year-over-year increase. The stock was down more than two percent in trading Friday on a weaker than expected outlook for the months ahead.
We’ve reached out to Docusign for comment, and we’ll update this post as we learn more.
This yen for experimentation can extend into brand partnerships. The meal I was least excited about in this season’s testing was actually the one I was initially most excited about. EveryPlate has been experimenting with a series of partnerships with boutique food brands, including New York Chinese–inspired dumpling brand Mimi Cheng’s. In this case, the flavors didn’t quite gel, and many of the dumplings arrived broken. In the meantime, EveryPlate has moved on and is now making dishes using flavored chickpeas and beans from craft canning brand Heyday.
I’ve had few mishaps with ingredients, but they do happen. A zucchini on my most recent order got some moisture or stray water in its bag. By the time I got to it, at the end of the week, this was death to the zucchini. I had to use my own, which luckily was already in the crisper.
I also had to make a special trip for eggs to fill out that turkey-ponzu rice bowl, because I’d neglected to look ahead at the recipe. There aren’t too many ingredients you need to have on hand to make EveryPlate’s dishes, but milk, eggs, and butter are sometimes among them. Look ahead when ordering recipes, or when receiving them.
Photograph: Matthew Korfhage
The seams can show more often on EveryPlate’s recipes than with premium kits like HelloFresh or Marley Spoon. I find myself improvising slightly: adding extra flavors after the fact, using my meat drippings on a side course, or swapping the order of operations. If I had my druthers, I would have used my own preferred prep on brussels sprouts rather than risk obliterating stray leaves in the oven.
But mostly, what EveryPlate offers is a baseline to work from. It offers an escape from my own tired routines: thought put into my meals by someone who is not me. A $7 meal where I buy an egg is still an economical meal—and a much more filling one than I would have had otherwise. EveryPlate remains the most budget-friendly meal kit I’d happily eat on a regular basis, a signal achievement for uncertain times.
Fuel is the literal lifeblood of all military aircraft. Missions in contemporary times often demand that a crew take off in one part of the world, fly to a location on the complete opposite side of the planet, then return home. None of this is possible without the capabilities of in-flight refueling, such as that by the KC-135 Stratotanker. The Stratotanker has shouldered the burden of this task since 1957, but the U.S. Air Force recognized the need to modernize its aging fleet of tankers. They wanted a platform that would be more robust and versatile for its needs, and thus was born the KC-46A Pegasus.
The KC-46A was developed to be a replacement for the KC-135s, which have been in continuous service for over 69 years. This new state-of-the-art aircraft was designed to be more than just a gas station in the sky, but a multi-capable platform for the U.S. Air Force to accomplish a diverse array of missions. The KC-46A can transport a mix of passengers (15 seats for the aircrew, including aeromedical evacuation), pallets of cargo up to 65,000 pounds, and of course, in-flight refueling utilizing boom, drogue, and wing refueling pods. The KC-46A also boasts numerous defensive and communication measures, making it more resilient in conflict zones. These enhancements were substantial improvements over the KC-135, so the U.S. Air Force has been eager to get them out in the field and fully operational since the first craft was delivered in 2019. Unfortunately for the KC-46A Pegasus, achieving full operational status has been a bumpy and elusive road.
A multitude of issues with the aircraft have followed it throughout its development. However, several specific deficiencies have proven to be resistant to a final solution. The first is that of the telescoping boom. The rigid centerline boom is the primary source of in-flight refueling for fighters and other planes, as it can transfer up to 1,200 gallons of fuel per minute. Made to work with a range of aircraft, this boom has repeatedly been determined to be so stiff that it is physically damaging aircraft. This was the case on November 7, 2022, when a F-22A Raptor in the process of refueling, in conjunction with several operational errors by the Pegasus boom operator and the Raptor pilot, resulted in $103,295.12 in damage. Work to mediate this issue has been ongoing with the FY 2025 Director, Operational Test & Evaluation report noting “improvements”, but the aircraft as a whole is “still below their threshold requirements.”
The second KC-46A issue is that of the Remote Vision System (RVS). Together with the telescoping boom, the RVS is what allows the boom operator to maneuver the refueling boom into place for in-flight refueling operations. Unlike other refueling craft that relied on direct line of sight from a rear position, the KC-46A RVS positions the boom operator up front with the other crew, who then uses advanced technology, such as cameras and 3D displays, to carry out refueling. This technology has proven troublesome however, with it proving difficult for the operator to see the receiving aircraft properly in certain lighting conditions. This lack of visual clarity has resulted in unintended contact with receiving aircraft, thus causing damage. These issues have resulted in boom operators reporting eye fatigue and headaches. Improvements have been ongoing with software updates until Boeing, the manufacturer of the plane, can develop a new RVS system.
The KC-46A Pegasus, even with its persistent and consistent problems, continues to be acquired and rolled out to the U.S. Air Force. As of December 2, 2025, the 100th KC-46A arrived at Travis Air Force Base, California, when Gen. Johnny Lamontagne, commander of the Air Mobility Command, stated that “The Pegasus represents a key chapter in air mobility, one built on innovation and unwavering commitment to the mission.” The program is, in fact, moving forward for the Air Force to acquire more of the craft, with a request in the FY2027 Aircraft Procurement budget for 15 more KC-46A at a cost of $3.9 billion.
The modernization of the U.S. Air Force’s aging refueling planes brought about the KC-46A Pegasus. Its enhanced capabilities, greater payloads, configurability, and higher-capacity in-flight refueling made it a strong choice for such a job. All these enhancements have also brought a litany of pervasive ongoing issues, from stiff fuel booms to challenging RVS technology issues that have yet to be fully resolved. This hasn’t stopped the plane from deploying for service as the work to iron out the kinks continues.
Jade Biosciences, Inc. (JBIO) Discusses Positive Interim Results From JADE101 Phase I Healthy Volunteer Study and Development Plans Transcript
SpaceX just won a second Golden Dome contract. This one is $4.16 billion.
SHE IS KILLING XRP!!! WATCH URGENT AND ACT FAST
French Open 2026 results: Alexander Zverev beats Rafael Jodar and will play Jakub Mensik in semi-finals
FIRST NIGHT REVIEW: Take That bring the Circus back to life in spectacular sun-soaked style
Is the Spurs Phenom Already Better Than Prime Diesel?
CryZENx Releases Fresh Playable Content Deep Inside Jabu-Jabu for His Ocarina of Time Remake
Novak Djokovic v Joao Fonseca LIVE: French Open latest scores and results after Jannik Sinner’s shocking collapse
CFTC Has Approved the First Regulated Bitcoin Perpetual Contract in the U.S.
The House | Inside Andy Burnham’s Makerfield Campaign: “Nobody Thinks This Is In The Bag”
LBank Surpasses 25 Million Users Worldwide as AFA Partnership Continues to Drive Global Growth
Bruce Willis’ Generosity Resurfaces Amid His Dementia
Weak ‘Supergirl’ Box Office Tracking Amid Milly Alcock Backlash
Snowflake (SNOW) Stock Rallies on Strong Q1 Results and AI Product Growth
One of the Greatest Sitcoms of All Time Shoots Up Apple TV’s Charts 11 Years Later
Demand Conditions Improve In Chemicals Sector In April 2026
Trump Taps Housing Chief Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Director After Gabbard Exit
MicroStrategy Moves $30 Million in BTC to Coinbase Prime: Is the Bitcoin Sell-Off Already Here?
Seagate (STX) Stock Surges to Record High on AI Boom and Legal Settlement
Everything you need to know as Cambridge’s Strawberry Fair returns after cancelled year
You must be logged in to post a comment Login