NEW YORK — The Nasdaq Composite Index tumbled more than 2% on Friday, March 20, 2026, closing at 21,647.61 after shedding 443.08 points, as escalating U.S.-Israeli military actions against Iran drove oil prices higher and fueled investor fears of prolonged economic disruption. The decline marked the tech-focused benchmark’s steepest single-day drop in recent weeks and contributed to a fourth consecutive weekly loss for major U.S. equities.

The sell-off accelerated throughout the trading session, with the index opening around 21,989 and dipping as low as 21,522.75 before a modest late-day recovery failed to offset broad-based losses. Heavyweights in artificial intelligence, semiconductors and data storage bore the brunt, reflecting concerns that higher energy costs could crimp corporate profits and slow AI infrastructure buildouts.

Nvidia Corp. and Microsoft Corp. led the retreat among mega-cap tech names, with losses exacerbating the Nasdaq’s underperformance relative to broader indexes. The S&P 500 fell 1.51% to close at 6,506.48, down 100.01 points, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined 0.96%, or 443.96 points, to 45,577.47. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, often called Wall Street’s fear gauge, spiked 11.31% to 26.78, signaling heightened market anxiety.

The primary catalyst was the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, now in its fourth week, which has sent Brent crude surging toward $114 per barrel in recent sessions. Investors worried that sustained high oil prices could reignite inflation pressures, complicate Federal Reserve policy and pressure consumer spending. Reports of intensified U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iranian targets amplified risk aversion, with energy-sensitive sectors showing relative resilience while growth-oriented tech stocks suffered.

“Geopolitics is dominating right now,” said one market strategist in comments echoed across trading floors. “Oil at these levels is a tax on the economy, and tech, with its high valuations and energy-intensive data centers, feels it most acutely.”

Semiconductor and hardware plays were particularly hard hit. Micron Technology Inc. dropped sharply amid broader sector weakness, while other chip-related names faced selling pressure. Constellation Energy and data storage firms like Western Digital and Seagate Technology also posted steep declines, as traders reassessed growth prospects in an environment of elevated input costs.

The Nasdaq’s performance contrasted with pockets of strength elsewhere. Energy stocks held up better, benefiting from the oil rally, while some defensive sectors provided limited cushion. However, the tech-heavy composition of the index—dominated by the so-called Magnificent Seven—left it vulnerable to any shift away from growth bets.

Broader market context showed stocks teetering near correction territory, defined as a 10% drop from recent highs. The Nasdaq had already given back significant ground in prior sessions, with weekly declines piling up as investors digested mixed economic signals and persistent inflation worries. Year-to-date, the index remained positive but well off its peaks, reflecting a choppy 2026 so far.

President Donald Trump’s administration added volatility through public statements on the conflict. Comments suggesting “productive” talks with Iran briefly lifted futures in after-hours trading on March 22 previews, with some reports indicating Dow futures jumping significantly on hopes of de-escalation. However, skepticism persisted about the veracity and immediacy of any breakthrough, keeping traders cautious heading into the March 23 open.

Analysts noted that while diplomatic overtures could provide relief, the market’s reaction underscored deeper concerns about supply chain disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and potential retaliatory actions. U.S. Navy assurances of escorting tankers offered some reassurance, but not enough to reverse Friday’s momentum.

Tech sector leaders remained in focus. Nvidia, a bellwether for AI enthusiasm, faced renewed scrutiny as higher energy costs threatened to slow hyperscaler spending on GPUs. Microsoft, with its cloud and AI ambitions, similarly contended with margin pressures. The Nasdaq-100, a subset of the Composite, fell 1.88% to 23,898.15 on March 20, underscoring the concentrated pain in large-cap growth.

Looking ahead, investors eyed upcoming economic data, including any fresh inflation readings or Fed commentary, for clues on interest rate paths. Persistent high oil could force the central bank into a tighter stance, further challenging rate-sensitive tech valuations.

Despite the dour session, some observers pointed to oversold conditions as a potential setup for a rebound if geopolitical headlines improve. “Markets hate uncertainty, but they’ve priced in a lot of bad news already,” one trader noted. “Any sign of cooling in the Middle East could spark a sharp relief rally.”

For now, the Nasdaq’s slide highlighted the index’s sensitivity to macro shocks in an era where technology underpins much of economic growth. With oil volatility and war risks lingering, traders braced for continued choppiness as the week drew to a close.

The March 20 close left the Nasdaq down roughly 5-6% over the prior month in some calculations, erasing earlier gains tied to AI optimism. As March 23 trading approached in Asian and European sessions, futures signaled potential opening volatility, with pre-market indications mixed amid evolving news on Iran talks.

Wall Street’s mood remained guarded, balancing hopes for diplomacy against the reality of elevated risks. The tech-driven Nasdaq, long a barometer of innovation and risk appetite, once again proved most exposed to global turbulence.

This article was written by

Oil prices moved higher in early Tuesday trade as supply concerns resurfaced after Iran denied engaging in talks with the United States to end the Gulf conflict. This pushed back against U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that a deal could be within reach.

In a post on Truth Social, Donald Trump said the United States and Iran had engaged in “very good and productive conversations” aimed at a complete resolution of hostilities, adding that all planned strikes on power plants and energy infrastructure would be deferred for five days.

Crude oil price on March 24

Brent crude futures rose $1.06, or 1.1%, to $101 a barrel at 0001 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained $1.58, or 1.8%, to $89.71.The rebound follows a sharp selloff on Monday, when crude dropped more than 10%. The decline came after Trump said he had ordered a five-day pause on planned strikes against Iran’s power infrastructure and indicated that “productive talks” with unnamed Iranian officials had yielded major points of agreement.

Despite the temporary pause in military action, concerns around the Strait of Hormuz persist. The ongoing conflict has effectively disrupted shipments of nearly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas passing through the key waterway.
Tehran has strongly denied any contact with Washington, calling the claims an attempt to influence financial markets. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards also said fresh attacks had been carried out on U.S. targets, dismissing Trump’s remarks as “worn-out psychological operations.”

Where are prices headed?

As per a Reuters report, international brokerage Macquarie has said that even if tensions ease in the near term, oil prices are likely to find support in the $85–$90 range, with a gradual move back toward $110 until normal flows through the Strait of Hormuz resume. The note added that if disruptions persist through April, Brent could still climb to $150 per barrel.

Meanwhile, the conflict continues to damage energy infrastructure across the region. Recent strikes hit a gas company office and a pressure-reduction facility in Isfahan. A separate projectile struck a gas pipeline supplying a power station in Khorramshahr, as reported by Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency.

(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times.)

A nationwide recall has expanded to include close to 10 million pounds of frozen vegetable fried rice sold at Trader Joe’s stores in dozens of states, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service.

Ajinomoto Foods North America Inc. announced a recall of 9,885,240 pounds of Trader Joe’s Vegetable Fried Rice after small pieces of glass were found in the frozen meals.

The glass shards ranged from one to three cm long and two to four mm wide.

90,000 BOTTLES OF CHILDREN’S IBUPROFEN RECALLED NATIONWIDE, FDA SAYS

The recalled products were sold in stores across 43 states, with the seven unaffected states being Hawaii, Maine, New Mexico, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia and Iowa.

The affected items had best-buy dates ranging from Feb. 28, 2026, to Nov. 19, 2026.

The latest notice was an expansion of a recall initially issued last month and expanded earlier this month. Nearly 37 million pounds of ready-to-eat items were affected in the total recall effort, which impacted more than a dozen brands in addition to Trader Joe’s, such as Kroger and Tai Pei.

Impacted items include Trader Joe’s Chicken Shu Mai and Trader Joe’s Chicken Fried Rice with stir-fried rice, vegetables, seasoned dark chicken meat and eggs.

The USDA classified the alert as a Class II recall in its latest notice, which means “use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote.”

GM RECALLS 17K VEHICLES OVER REAR TOE LINK FRACTURE THAT COULD LEAD TO CRASHES

 CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

Customers are urged not to consume the recalled items. They should dispose of the product or return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

No injuries have been reported thus far in connection with the recall, but the USDA said anyone concerned about potential injuries should contact a healthcare provider.

Oil prices rose in early trade on Tuesday on supply fears, as Iran denied it had held talks with the United States to end the war in the Gulf, contradicting President Donald Trump, who said a deal could be reached soon.

Brent futures rose $1.06, or 1.1%, to $101 a barrel at 0001 GMT, while U.S. ‌West Texas Intermediate (WTI) climbed $1.58, ⁠or 1.8%, ⁠to $89.71.

Crude futures dropped more than 10% on Monday, after Trump said he had ordered a five-day delay to attacks he had threatened on Iran’s power plants, adding the U.S. had held productive talks with unnamed Iranian officials that had produced “major points of agreement”.

“By shelving the plan to strike Iranian power plants for five days, the U.S. effectively sucked much of the ‘war premium’ from the oil price,” said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade.

“Today’s moderate bounce is just the market finding its footing in the mud. Traders are aware that while ⁠the missiles are ‌on hold, the Strait of Hormuz is still far from a clear waterway.”

The war has all but halted shipments of about one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas ⁠through the Strait of Hormuz. However, two tankers bound for India sailed through the strait on Monday.
Tehran rejected the claims of contact with Washington, dismissing them as an attempt to manipulate financial markets, while Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they had launched new attacks on U.S. targets and denounced Trump’s comments as “worn-out psychological operations.” “Even with a possible decrease in tensions after (Monday’s) announcement from President Trump, we expect a price floor of $85-$90 and a natural drift back to the $110 range until the Strait of Hormuz is restored,” Macquarie said in a note.

It added that if the strait remains effectively shut ‌until the end of April, Brent could still reach $150 per barrel.

Fighting has damaged energy infrastructure across the region. In the latest attacks, a gas company office and a pressure-reduction station were hit in Iran’s central city of Isfahan, while ⁠a projectile also struck a gas pipeline feeding a power station in Khorramshahr, the Iranian semi-official Fars news agency reported.

The United States has temporarily waived sanctions on Russian and Iranian oil already at sea to ease shortages. Industry sources said traders have offered Iranian crude to Indian refiners at a premium to ICE Brent following Washington’s move.

The International Energy Agency Executive Director Fatih Birol said on Monday it is consulting Asian and European governments on possible further releases of strategic reserves “if necessary”.

Oil executives and energy ministers at a conference in Houston warned of the longer-term impact of the U.S.-Israel war with Iran on the global economy, though U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright downplayed the crisis.

The dollar nursed steep losses against major currencies on Tuesday in a wild start to the week after U.S. President Donald Trump delayed the bombing of Iran’s power grid, a move that allayed fear of a prolonged war in the Middle East.

Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that the U.S. and Iran had held “very good and productive” conversations about a “complete and total resolution of hostilities in ‌the Middle East”. ⁠Iran denied ⁠it had engaged in any direct negotiations.

The contrasting comments left markets on edge after a risk-on rally immediately after Trump’s post in which he postponed the bombing for five days. Still, markets were mindful of the war all but halting shipments of about one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas through the Strait of Hormuz.

Sterling eased 0.5% to $1.33925 after jumping nearly 1% on Monday, while the euro was down 0.2% at $1.1593 after gaining 0.4% in the previous trading session.

The ⁠dollar index, ‌which measures the U.S. currency against a basket of peers, rose nearly 0.2% to 99.35 after dipping to near a two-week low on Monday.

“The news overnight is ⁠giving a breather to volatility at least, but it’s difficult to see that this is going to trigger a risk-on trend,” said Rodrigo Catril, a currency strategist at National Australia Bank.
However, Trump’s policy track record was keeping markets wary, with traders uncertain whether this marked the start of genuine negotiations or simply a retreat from volatility-inducing threats, he said. The Australian dollar fell 0.2% to $0.6993 in early trade, pulling back from a six-week high. The New Zealand dollar was down 0.23% at $0.5845.

Oil prices edged higher after plunging more ‌than 10% on Monday, with Brent crude futures retopping $100.94 a barrel as supply fear keeps sentiment cautious.

“The key question is whether participants see this as a genuine extension that brings a deal closer, or ⁠simply a delay that prolongs uncertainty,” said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone.

“The U.S. dollar has seen selling on the back of the move lower in crude and the broader repositioning in risk. However, there is little conviction in the move, and conditions remain ripe for sharp reversals.”

The yen was steady at 158.61 a dollar after Japan’s core consumer inflation rate hit 1.6% in February. That was below the Bank of Japan’s 2% target for the first time in nearly four years, complicating the bank’s efforts to justify further interest rate hikes.

TEHRAN, Iran — Iran’s economy, already strained by years of international sanctions, has suffered severe setbacks from the U.S.-Israeli military campaign that began Feb. 28, 2026, with widespread infrastructure destruction, disrupted trade routes and soaring global energy prices amplifying the pain. While precise figures remain elusive due to limited official disclosures from Tehran and the fluid nature of the conflict, analysts estimate the direct physical damage and immediate economic losses could reach tens of billions of dollars, exacerbating a pre-war contraction and threatening food security.

The joint U.S.-Israeli operation, dubbed Operation Epic Fury by some military sources, targeted Iranian military sites, leadership compounds, air defenses and energy infrastructure in a bid to degrade capabilities and pressure the regime. By early March, reports indicated over 4,000 civilian buildings had been damaged or destroyed across the country, according to TRT World and other outlets citing Iranian sources and satellite imagery. These strikes hit urban areas, industrial facilities and transportation hubs, compounding existing vulnerabilities.

Iran’s economy was already contracting under heavy sanctions before the war, with GDP growth negative in recent years and inflation rampant. The conflict has accelerated this decline. Wikipedia’s entry on the economic impact of the 2026 Iran War notes severe infrastructure damage and revenue losses, particularly from disrupted oil and gas exports. Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz in response disrupted roughly 20% of global oil supplies and significant liquefied natural gas volumes, but the move backfired by isolating Iran’s own imports.

Iran relies heavily on Persian Gulf ports for grain shipments, with about 30% of its wheat imported. By March 6, nine grain vessels waited outside the strait, unable to enter amid the blockade and hostilities. Food import funding, already challenging, became nearly impossible as revenues from oil exports plummeted and global prices spiked.

Direct physical damage estimates are scarce from Iranian authorities, who have downplayed impacts to maintain domestic morale. Intelligence assessments cited in reports suggest the strikes have not yet toppled the clerical or military structure, but the economic harm is substantial. Chatham House analysis indicates Iran’s GDP could fall more than 10% due to the war, based on parallels with other conflict zones, though official data has not been released since 2024.

The war’s broader toll includes lost export revenues from energy. Pre-war, Iran exported limited oil under sanctions waivers, but strikes on facilities and export terminals have curtailed even that. Global oil prices surged over 40-50% since late February, with Brent crude reaching $106 per barrel by mid-March, per Al Jazeera reporting. This windfall bypassed Iran due to disrupted flows and sanctions, while domestic energy infrastructure repairs will demand billions.

Civilian and industrial losses add to the bill. Strikes near critical sites, including one projectile incident close to the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant (confirmed undamaged by the IAEA), raised fears of environmental and economic fallout. Repeated hits on airports like Mehrabad in Tehran and military airbases degraded logistics. Overhead photos and reports show craters and structural damage at various locations, with costs for rebuilding likely in the high billions.

The conflict has also strained Iran’s ability to respond. Degraded air defenses—around 85% of surface-to-air missiles destroyed by mid-March, per Israeli Army Radio citing IDF sources—left the country exposed, forcing resource diversion from economic recovery to military defense. Desertions among personnel and confusion in security forces further hampered response.

Globally, the war’s ripple effects have indirectly hurt Iran. Higher energy prices strained import-dependent economies, but for Iran, the inability to capitalize on high oil prices while facing blockade compounded losses. Capital Economics and Oxford Economics reports forecast limited short-term global GDP hits outside the Gulf if the war ends quickly, but prolonged fighting could see oil at $130-150 per barrel, worsening Iran’s isolation.

Tehran’s retaliatory strikes on U.S. bases in the region caused about $800 million in damage in the first two weeks, per BBC analysis, but these pale against Iran’s own infrastructure hits. The U.S. has borne massive costs—Pentagon estimates put the first six days at over $11.3 billion, rising to potentially $16.5 billion by day 12 per CSIS, with daily expenses around $500 million thereafter. Israel’s Finance Ministry projected weekly economic losses of up to $2.93 billion from disruptions and mobilizations.

As of March 23, 2026, the conflict shows no immediate end, with ongoing strikes and diplomatic efforts faltering. U.S. officials have floated easing some sanctions on Iranian oil to stabilize markets, but progress remains uncertain. Iran’s regime maintains resilience claims, but analysts warn the cumulative economic pressure—physical destruction, lost revenues, import disruptions and inflation—could fuel internal unrest over time.

Rebuilding estimates vary widely. Repairing thousands of damaged buildings, restoring energy facilities and reopening trade routes could cost tens of billions, potentially rivaling or exceeding U.S. war expenditures if prolonged. Food security remains a flashpoint, with grain shortages looming if ports stay blocked.

The war underscores Iran’s economic fragility amid geopolitical confrontation. While military damage assessments focus on strategic degradation, the human and financial cost to ordinary Iranians—higher prices, shortages and uncertainty—may prove the most enduring legacy. As battles continue, the full USD toll on Iran’s economy remains a moving target, but early indicators point to devastation measured in the tens of billions, with recovery years away even if hostilities cease soon.