Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

UK Government’s New Screen Time Limits For Children Under Five

Published

on

UK Government's New Screen Time Limits For Children Under Five

New screen time limits have been revealed for children in the UK under five.

The guidance, from the UK government, comes as almost one-quarter (24%) of parents of three‑ to five‑year‑olds say they find it hard to control their child’s screen time, and 98% of two‑year‑olds watch screens every day.

In response to parents calling for support on how much screen time is too much, as well as how to build healthy habits, the government shared new evidence-informed guidance for babies, toddlers and pre-schoolers.

What are the new screen time rules?

Advertisement

Under twos should avoid screen time other than for shared activities that encourage bonding, interaction and conversation (ie. FaceTiming family), per the new guidance.

Meanwhile two- to five-year-olds should stick to no more than one hour of screen time a day.

The government also advises avoiding screen time at mealtimes and in the hour before bed, so as not to disrupt sleep.

What else does the guidance say?

Advertisement
  • Opt for slow-paced, age-appropriate content.
  • Fast-paced, social media-style videos and AI toys or tools should be avoided for young children.
  • Parents are encouraged to watch or use screens together to make the experience more interactive, as talking, asking questions, and engaging with the content is better for children’s development.
  • Make safe screen swaps like reading bedtime stories together or playing simple games at mealtimes.

The guidance stems from the findings of an expert panel led by the Children’s Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza and Professor Russell Viner, a paediatrician and expert in children’s health.

The panel reviewed the latest evidence on screen use in under-5s, and found long periods of time spent on screens alone can get in the way of activities critical for development.

Think: sleep, physical activity, creative play, and interaction with parents.

But not all screen use is equal.

Watching screens with an engaged adult where parents talk and ask questions is linked to better cognitive development than solo use.

Advertisement

Slow-paced content is also far better for development than fast-paced social media-style videos.

Evidence also suggests time limits shouldn’t apply in the same way for screen-based assistive technologies to support children with special educational needs and disabilities.

Prime minister Keir Starmer said: “Parenting in a digital world can feel relentless. Screens are everywhere, and the advice is often conflicting.”

The new guidance “cuts through the noise”, he added, “to keep children safe and make sure healthy habits are baked in from the start”.

Advertisement

Admitting that some will oppose the guidance, he added, “I will always stand on the side of parents doing their best for their children”.

Children’s Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza said: “Young children need their parents to be confident in managing their screen use, but often this can be overwhelming for parents learning to navigate this.

“My hope is that this guidance helps to cut through the conflicting advice available and prioritise children’s development and wellbeing, as well as their safety.”

Neil Leitch, CEO of the Early Years Alliance, welcomed the new guidance and its emphasis on providing practical tips and advice for parents and carers.

Advertisement

He added he hopes it’s “the first step towards equipping children – and those supporting them – with the skills they need to thrive in an increasingly digital world and ensuring that technology enhances rather than undermines early learning and wellbeing”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Repression is a routine police practice

Published

on

Repression is a routine police practice

On 25 March, police monitoring group Netpol released its annual protest report. Building on the foundation of the 2024 report ‘This is Repression’ — the latest version is entitled ‘How Repression Became Routine’ (2025). What’s more, it makes for chilling, but sadly familiar, reading.

The Canary sent Skwawkbox out to report on the launch event itself. You can read his article here, which also serves to introduce the report. Likewise, you can read the full report here. 

In this article, we’ll take a bit of a closer look at the report itself, along with its main findings.

Core findings

With the 2024 report already having concluded that Britain exists in a state of repression, Netpol stated that:

Advertisement

Between July 2025 and February 2026, Netpol conducted in-depth qualitative research within protest movements, drawing on interviews, testimonies, legal observer notes, court records, police and government data, media coverage and 21 Freedom of Information requests.

Our findings show that repression has become routine in British protest policing: new and overlapping laws, combined with a growing tendency to treat protest as a security issue, have normalised surveillance, heavy-handed policing, and punishment, with harm concentrated on marginalised groups. Protest is increasingly policed as a matter of threat management rather than democratic expression.

Netpol produced the 2025 report with the help of the Article 11 Trust. Back in 2020, the charity was set up with the aim of defending the rights to freedom of assembly, as set out under Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The 2025 report broke its core findings down into five overarching points:

  1. Officers are exercising powers beyond and ahead of gaining the lawful authority to do so.
  2. The police are using layered legislation to confuse and control protestors.
  3. Security logics now dominate protest policing.
  4. The restriction of protests has spread out over a wider geographical area.
  5. The gap in police accountability is widening.

Power beyond authority

The new report highlighted the fact that police forces, and especially the Met, have made unlawful use of their powers. More specifically, they’re exercising powers like ‘cumulative disruption’ conditions before they’ve even passed through parliament.

Police already have powers to impose conditions on protests that cause “serious disruption to the life of the community”. These were put in place by the Public Order Act 1986.

Advertisement

However, the forthcoming Crime and Policing Bill proposes to amend this to allow police to consider ‘cumulative disruption’, ie. the effect of repeated protests. This would effectively allow officers to treat multiple minor protests in the same manner as larger ‘disruptive’ protests.

Netpol stated that it had seen evidence suggesting that:

these trailed powers are already being used, despite provisions not yet having been passed into law. In May, for example, the Met used Public Order powers to block International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (IJAN) protests, citing the ‘cumulative impact’ of weekly protests. Similarly, in
November, the Met forced Palestine Solidarity Coalition (PSC) to change the route of its planned march, citing the “cumulative effect of [PSC] protests”.

Likewise, the report also found that police continued to use powers even after they’d been appealed. In particular, the monitoring group cited police use of the repealed ‘more than minor’ threshold for serious disruption.

Layered legislation

Next up, the police abuse of layered legislation. Forces across the country have access to a wide array of powers granted by multiple pieces of legislation. Officers are using these layered powers to confuse and control protesters – and also to maximise their intelligence gathering and data capture.

Advertisement

The report explained that:

Because these powers overlap, it is often unclear which rules apply and why, even before any enforcement action takes place.

As a case study, Netpol cited what it called the “34-60aa-50-35 dance”. This was a specific and targeted weaponisation of layered legislation noted by legal observers in Bristol. In sequence, it goes:

  • Section 60aa (Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994) requires the removal of face coverings and creates a pretext for stopping people without reasonable suspicion

  • Section 34 (Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014) provides authorisation for police to disperse protesters for up to 48 hours, effectively criminalising protesters for assembling once deemed as ‘likely’ to cause disorder. This, in turn, sets the precedent for the steps that follow.

  • Section 50 follows, criminalising non-compliance and providing an easy arrest mechanism while also acting as an intelligence-gathering model which allows police to identify movement actors.

  • Section 35 (Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014) is then evoked, allowing the police to clear out protesters once data collection has been completed.

Security logics

Chillingly, the report also found that national security and counterterrorism logics are now embedded in routine protest policing. This means that authorities are framing dissent is framed as an existential security threat. These ‘exceptional’ concerns allow them to ‘justify’ the use of repressive tactics.

Netpol stated that:

Advertisement

We have seen the unprecedented application of counter-terrorism legislation – in particular, the Terrorism Act 2000 – largely in response to Palestine solidarity protest, including to proscribe direct action group Palestine Action.

This legislation was ostensibly drafted to tackle extreme threats to national security. However, we’re now regularly seeing it weaponised against demonstrators going about what was once ordinary protest activity.

Even the National Security Act 2023 is now being used against protesters and journalists, marking the even greater application of national security powers against political dissent.

Geographical spread

Across Britain, the use of powers to restrict assemblies shot up by 230% over 2024 – 2025. What’s more, where this repression was once largely limited to London (and the Met), it’s now spreading.

In part, this is a reflection of the fact that the protest landscape itself is seeing a lower proportion of large-scale national marches. Instead, “sustained, local and site-based assemblies” are dominating the scene.

Advertisement

Until March 2025, the Met was the only force to impose wholesale restrictions on marches. However, this year’s restrictions on assemblies were far less localised. The report explained that:

This pattern indicates the widening geographical spread of public order policing through restrictions placed on static and sustained protests outside weapons factories, local government buildings and hotels homing refugees.

Widening accountability gap

Finally, whilst police powers have grown in number and scope, there’s been no corresponding growth in accountability. Instead, the public’s powers to scrutinise and restrain the police have grown weaker. Legislative and policy changes are also undermining accountability and routes to redress policy repression.

Meanwhile, pre-emptive approaches to policing are on the rise, enabled by vast surveillance networks. By its nature, these pre-crime tactics are opaque and difficult for the public to scrutinise.

Likewise, the danger for journalists and legal observers – the people documenting police repression – is increasing. This reduces accountability by eroding methods of evidence collection. The report stated that:

Advertisement

We spoke to one legal observer who had been stopped by the police on fabricated charges, noting that
police harassment had forced them to take a step back in 2025, while another was arrested at the national PSC demonstration in January 2025.

We have also received a number of reports of police violence against legal observers, ranging from being caught in kettles, to being pepper sprayed, to being shoved into objects and vehicles. One legal observer told us that they no longer give too much thought to being pushed by police due to experiencing this kind of force as a regular occurrence over the summer of 2025.

Conclusion

Whilst the findings of the report detailed a chilling escalation of repressive policing, Netpol took care not to end on a hopeless note. Rather, they emphasised the fact that the public is resisting, and we have not yet given up—and the movement is growing:

Despite the trends identified in this report, repression has not yet silenced dissent. Instead, solidarity with protest movements throughout 2025 strengthened, with steadfast resilience shown by those protesting for Palestine and communities defending themselves against far-right and anti-migrant demonstrations.

Crucially, the ability to protest has been upheld by those who build and sustain the infrastructures of resistance, amid depleted resources and increasingly complex legal and political environments. However, with the passing of another year, the stakes of exercising the right to protest have once again increased. It is vital that we reject the idea that repression is inevitable before the dwindling space to dissent disappears.

The UK government, and the police along with them, have built a state in which repression has become routine. However, the public has—time and time again—met them head-on. The state is witnessing first-hand that we cannot be legislated into submission, and that we will not let go of our rights and freedoms without a fight.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Green Left surges to second place in Danish elections

Published

on

Green Left surges to second place in Danish elections

On 24 March, the Green Left consolidated its role as a key force in Danish politics. It has grown from 15 to 20 seats in the Folketing. And this is a clear signal of rising support for green and progressive policies, another in a series of recent Green Party breakthroughs across Europe.

In November 2025, the Green Left won the local elections in Copenhagen, with Sisse Marie Welling becoming the Lord Mayor of Denmark’s capital. In late February in the UK, the Green Party resoundingly won the Gorton and Denton by-election in Greater Manchester. While in early March, the German Greens achieved a major regional victory in Baden-Württemberg, and won the Mayorship of Munich for the first time.

Green Left has been the official English name since 2022 of the Socialistisk Folkeparti, or SF. That translates directly to Socialist People’s Party. It campaigns on a range of issues, prioritising economic justice and care for the environment. It has been a full member of the European Green Party since 2014.

Ciarán Cuffe, co-chair of the European Green Party, said:

Advertisement

Our member Green Left becoming for the first time the second-biggest force in the Danish parliament shows that voters across Europe are turning to Greens for credible solutions on the issues that matter most: protection of nature, a society with less stress, and affordable energy from renewable sources that are not exposed to geopolitical shocks.

The Danish success confirms strong recent results for Green parties in the UK, Germany and the Netherlands.

Vula Tsetsi, co-chair of the European Green Party, added:

The series of successes starts to show a pattern of people voting for a green future across Europe. There is again a clear appetite among voters to put social welfare, climate and environmental action at the top of the political agenda.

Europeans support the strategy to invest in renewables to secure European energy independence. From Copenhagen to Lyon, from Manchester to Amsterdam, people are choosing a future that protects their health, their environment, and their bills.

Featured image via Green Left

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour Together turns its back on Epstein’s pal, Mandelson

Published

on

Labour Together turns its back on Epstein's pal, Mandelson

As we’ve reported, Labour Together have been the key drivers of the disastrous Keir Starmer government. Key members of the group also facilitated the disastrous return and exit of Peter Mandelson. And in a sign of just how disastrous it’s been for them, it seems the group is now trying to hide their connections to Mandelson:

The Frauds

The Fraud is a book written by investigative journalist Paul Holden. The book covers Starmer’s rise to power, aided as he was by Labour Together. In a passage serialised by the Canary, Holden wrote:

Labour fought the December 2019 general election with a base split by Brexit and a party divided against itself. It went down to a heavy defeat. After Jeremy Corbyn resigned the helm, Keir Starmer wasted no time in putting his own name forward for the role of new party leader. Starmer’s leadership campaign was a slick affair, launched and defined by a well-produced video that touted his leftist credentials and values. One campaign insider described how, from the outset, it was streets ahead of any contenders in terms of messaging, organisation, infrastructure, and funding.

Starmer could launch his candidacy so quickly thanks to years of preparation largely outside the public eye. This work was done by a political project operating through an organisation called Labour Together. The project had likely started preparing for a leadership contest before Starmer was even aware of its existence. Labour Together provided access to funders. It would also supply Starmer’s key officials including his Svengali, Morgan McSweeney, and many of his future shadow cabinet and cabinet ministers.

Advertisement

The Fraud covers the “illegal funding that made Starmer Labour leader“, as well as the “antisemitism crisis” which Labour Together concocted to smear their opponents.

For the crime of reporting accurately on their activities, Labour Together sent private investigators to spy on Paul Holden. It would later come out that Labour Together also spied on mainstream journalists, creating a national scandal that forced Labour Together director Josh Simons to step down from his ministerial position. Simons is one of the men pictured at the top alongside Peter Mandelson.

All in it together

At this point, it’s clear why Labour Together would want to distance themselves from long-time Epstein pal Peter Mandelson. At the same time, Labour Together’s image is so tarnished that Mandelson probably wants nothing to do with them either.

What a wretched group to have found themselves at the heart of government.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Cuba convoy activists harassed by US authorities

Published

on

Cuba convoy activists harassed by US authorities

As reported by the Canary on 19 March 2026, a convoy of activists travelled to Cuba to protest the US blockade on the country. In a seeming act of revenge, US authorities have now harassed these activists upon their return to the states:

Cuba Convoy

As Ed Sykes reported for the Canary:

Advertisement

Donald Trump’s second administration has massively tightened the longstanding US stranglehold on Cuba. His escalating campaign of terror has brought the island’s health system to its knees, putting thousands of lives at risk.

The US is preventing other countries from exporting fuel to Cuba. This is slowly causing the country to grind to a halt:

Fuel is still reaching private companies, however, demonstrating that the US is pursuing a corporate takeover of its island neighbour:

Advertisement

Sykes added:

Advertisement

Numerous social movements, humanitarian groups, trade unionists, and public figures have stepped up to try and scupper Trump’s plans, though.

These groups and individuals have built a coalition to send humanitarian supplies to Cuba, including medicine, food, and solar equipment. In particular, this aid seeks to support medical workers and their patients, while ensuring children have access to vital nutrition.

The first of the venture from the ‘Nuestra América Convoy‘ has already arrived on the island. And more will arrive in the coming days:

Harassed

In the video at the top, musician and activist Lavish Mack explains:

Advertisement

Yo, this is Lavish and many other people from the Nuestra convoy. We just returned from Cuba and landed in Miami. We’re in the International Airport right now. 18 out of the 20 of us had our phones taken. We were all detained by Border Patrol and interrogated for, I think, about three hours about what exactly we were doing in Cuba, even though they know exactly what we were doing, which is delivering 30 tons of humanitarian, much-needed aid to the Cuban people.

Additionally, the last six people that they took were the Black people. And they just had us in there until Chris finally spoke up and was like, yo, this is a bad little look for y’all. We about to sue you. Then they started expediting and getting us through, but they took all of our phones.

The Chris in question was labour organiser Chris Smalls who famously took on Amazon. Smalls has also supported the people of Palestine:

In the Lavish Mack video above, another activist said:

Advertisement

But the other thing I want to add is that I asked for legal counsel many, many times. I said, can I have legal counsel? They said no. And I said, I hear you, but I would really like to have legal counsel. I said… I’m not going to lock the phone until I speak to legal counsel. You may be 100 percent right, but I’m going to feel more comfortable first. So I want to let you know that they said they have warrantless search powers. Maybe they’re right. Maybe they’re not. But that’s what they said.

Full-on imperialism

As many have highlighted, the US has moved into a new phase in which its imperial ambitions are increasingly transparent:

It’s important that people in the West make it clear that we will not tolerate this from our leaders.

Solidarity to all those who are taking a stand.

Featured image via Instagram

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Met police constable fronts anti-Al Jazeera mob in Golders Green

Published

on

Met police constable fronts anti-Al Jazeera mob in Golders Green

The man who was filmed verbally abusing a Palestinian Al Jazeera journalist in North London is a serving Met Police special constable and apparent fan of “Tel Aviv Tommy” Robinson.

The Al Jazeera film crew were harassed while reporting on the burning of four community ambulances in Golders Green on 23 March. The destroyed vehicles belonged to the Jewish emergency volunteer service, Hatzola.

The authorities are treating the ambulance attack as an antisemitic hate crime.

Declassified UK have now revealed that the vocal member of the angry mob filmed haranguing the film crew is none other than Special Constable David Soffer.

Advertisement

Declassified reported that:

David Soffer – who also runs a reputation management firm according to records filed at Companies House – is seen making his way to the centre of the mob and insulting the cameraman.

A prolific user of X/Twitter, Soffer has publicly expressed his support for Israel.

Advertisement

The outlet said Soffer’s online footprint also suggests support for British fascist Tommy Robinson:

In 2024, the far-right activist Tommy Robinson posted an image on Twitter saying “Fuck Palestine”, adding: “The shithole is full of inbred Islamist parasites and terrorists.”

Soffer responded, saying that Robinson “is telling the truth” and that Israel will “justly finish” the war in Gaza.

Soffer verbally abuses the journalists in the footage. He calls one Palestinian journalist a “dog” and a “donkey” in Arabic and says “Go back to Qatar.”

The Met Police told Declassified UK:

Advertisement

We are aware that an off duty serving Met officer was involved in the altercation. The matter has been referred to the Department of Professional Standards for assessment.

Tommy fanboy cop

Journalist Matt Kennard said it’s easy to imagine the reaction if the roles were flipped:

Other users have pointed to the Met police constable’s past appearances on white supremacist channel, GB News, which he also proudly advertises on his LinkedIn.

Advertisement

 

The Met previously said of the altercation:

We’re aware of the footage showing the verbal altercation between local residents and journalists.

Freedom of the press is important and journalists must be able to do their job without being subject to intimidation or harassment.

Advertisement

Officers did intervene but we recognise that there was an extended period where the journalists were put in a difficult situation which led them to leave the area. Officers on duty in the area have been asked to be alert to any similar altercations in the coming days.

As the Canary wrote on 24 March, the British establishment quickly weaponised the ambulance attack against British Muslims—despite there being no evidence at the time of who carried it out:

With depressing predictability, politicians are using the antisemitic Golders Green arson as an excuse to roll out Islamophobic rhetoric. Never mind the fact that we have no idea who carried out the attack – the knee-jerk bigotry is already in full swing.

Now we know one of the most abusive members of the 23 March mob was a Tommy Robinson-supporting serving cop. The Met need to come down like a ton of bricks. We don’t hold our breath though.

Featured image via GB News, YouTube Channel

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Palestine Action protest signs to be criminalised again

Published

on

Palestine Action protest signs to be criminalised again

The Met Police force has announced that it is going to start arresting people again – under the Starmer regime’s ban on support for anti-genocide group Palestine Action that the High Court has already ruled unlawful.

The Met had said it would stop arresting protesters holding signs supporting the group until the outcome of the Home Office’s appeal against the ruling. In the meantime, it said, it would record people’s details in case the government won. However, it has now said it’s going to resume arrests, because the appeal will take months to come to court.

Palestine Action arrests to resume

So months of stress, cost and restriction of liberty of being arrested and facing potential prosecution and imprisonment will again be inflicted on people protesting against a ban that is currently against the law. And this will be done to appease the UK’s Zionist government and the demands of Israel lobby groups outraged that the court should put human rights above the feelings of Israel’s supporters.

Right.

Advertisement

Thousands of people, mostly older people or disabled people, have already been arrested for opposing the Palestine Action ban. Many have faced punitive bail conditions. Israel lobby groups expressed their horror at the High Court judgment and their expectation that Israel supporters should be prioritised. Just as they did when a jury dared acquit a group of Palestine Action activists who had been imprisoned without trial for 18 months.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

DWP still pretending to care about claimants mental health

Published

on

DWP still pretending to care about claimants mental health

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) are still pretending to care about the mental health of people going through the benefits system – despite their actions showing otherwise.

DWP bullshit again

Labour MP Sarah Hall asked the DWP a written question about mental health:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment he has made of the potential impact of social security assessment and application processes on the mental health of claimants.

The department’s response was the typical non-answer.

Minister for Disabled People, Stephen Timms, answered:

Advertisement

The Pathways to Work Green Paper set out our commitment to get the basics right and improve the experience for people who use the system of health and disability. This includes exploring ways to improve trust and transparency in PIP and WCA through reviewing our approach to safeguarding, recording assessments to increase trust in the process, and moving back to having more face-to-face assessments while continuing to meet the needs of people who may require different methods of assessment.

Timms continued:

We have also launched the Timms Review, the first ever full review of PIP, to ensure we have a system that supports disabled people to achieve better health, higher living standards and greater independence, including through employment. The Review is being co-produced with disabled people, the organisations that represent them, carers, clinicians, experts, MPs and other stakeholders, so a wide range of views and voices are heard.

The Review will consider how PIP can enable disabled people to live independently; whether the assessment effectively captures the impact of long-term health conditions and disability in the modern world; and whether it should consider any other evidence. It will also look at how the assessment could ensure people access the right support at the right level.

Oh, the Timms review? The one that already looks like a stitch-up?

No meaningful research

What’s clear from this copy-and-paste answer is that they still haven’t done any real assessments of the impact the process has on people’s mental health. They also don’t intend to do any meaningful research into this.

Advertisement

This is despite them being given proof for a very long time that the system does negatively impact mental health. This includes a whole bloody book by John Pring. Just this February, it was uncovered that 1 in 5 privately contracted benefit assessors aren’t safeguard trained.

They’re also very light on what “reviewing our approach to safeguarding” actually means. The department has been pulled up by multiple committees on the way they treat claimants. The Public Accounts Committee hauled them up for demonising claimants instead of fixing their own system. The department was also forced to admit that the ESA helpline was so bad it was driving claimants to self-harm. 

Then there’s the absolute bullshit that face-to face assessments will help people’s mental health, when the assessments are found to be stressful and inhumane.

By citing all of their previous work, they’re attempting to boost their own credibility. But the Pathways to Work Green consultation was completely ignored. The Timms Review is currently underway, but it’s also being rushed and ignoring the needs of disabled people in favour of saving money. Timms mentioning this essentially confirms that the review will strip back support.

Advertisement

At the end of the day, the DWP don’t give a fuck about claimants’ mental health, if they did they would’ve done more to protect them years ago. All they care about it saving money, no matter how many disabled people die.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Salah is a rare Muslim hero in the footballing world

Published

on

Salah is a rare Muslim hero in the footballing world

Saying goodbye to Mohamed Salah is not simply about football; when Salah walks away from Liverpool, the club loses more than a prolific scorer; it loses a cultural touchstone. He arrived as a hopeful youngster and leaves as one of the defining figures of this generation. A player whose impact extended far beyond goals and trophies.

Salah: from Nagrig to the world stage

Before the goals, the trophies and the deafening chants, there was a boy from Nagrig armed with nothing but belief and determination. Salah’s journey is the kind of story sport loves; belief, sacrifice and relentless work. Overcoming setbacks and doubts which would derail many, only sharpened his resolve. Arriving at Liverpool, he did not join the club as a complete player. Instead, he arrived determined to prove himself, to learn and to not only lift a club but also a city.

Advertisement

Watching Salah at Liverpool felt like witnessing something truly rare. From his very first season, there was an unmistakable feeling that something great was brewing. His pace was electric, his finishing was ruthless. Yet it was his relentless desire that truly set him apart. Every run, every touch, every celebration revealed how deeply the club and the fans mattered to him.

Records fell, defenders faltered and stadiums erupted, yet Salah remained unchanged. Even as the goals mounted and high praise surrounded him, he stayed focused, grounded and driven. Champions league nights at Anfield became unforgettable nights charged with belief, noise and pure emotion. When Salah delivered on the biggest of stages, it felt as though he carried the hopes of all the supporters with him.

More than a footballer

For many Salah has always been more than just a player. As a Muslim football superstar, his expressions of faith on the pitch have been quiet, but powerful. Many a time, fans have seen him fall to the floor in sujood, a poignant reminder that devotion and elite performance can coexist without apology. His conduct challenged assumptions, opened conversations, and offered representation to millions who had not seen themselves reflected at football’s highest levels.

Away from the pitch, his willingness to speak and act on broader issues, notably his dignified support for Palestine, showed a conscience that matched his talent. He used his platform to stand in solidarity rather than seek attention, demonstrating how athletes can carry both influence and responsibility.

And, Salah made global headlines when he remained one of a very small number of professional footballers to challenge UEFA’s complicity in Israel’s murder of Palestinian footballer, Suleiman al-Obeid:

Salah never chased the spotlight; his conduct with teammates, supporters and charitable causes did the talking. His generosity, humility and having humanity in his heart turned admiration into something special.

What Salah means to me

Legacies are measured largely in silverware when it comes to football. However, Salah gave belief, to a village, to a nation, and to an entire generation by expanding what was possible in the minds of young players who now see his path as proof that origins will not limit destiny. The terraces will keep singing his name, teaching it to fans who never got the chance to watch him live, but ensuring the legend that is Mohamed Salah and his presence will remain at Anfield.

Thank you, Mohamed Salah, for the goals, the grace and the moments that made football feel larger than sport. You leave Liverpool not only as a record breaker but as a bridge between cultures and a symbol of possibility. The Egyptian King will remain part of  Liverpool FC for as long as fans in the stands will be singing his name.

It is truly remarkable to witness an African Muslim footballer achieve the highest accolades as Mohamed Salah has done in the most watched league in the world. His journey is a testament not only to his immense talent and perseverance, but also to the rarity of such accomplishments given the current climate in the UK, where the far-right have undertaken a worrying resurgence. Even in the face of increasing censorship and pressure against voices supporting Palestine, Salah has steadfastly maintained his public support for the cause. His rise serves as a beacon of hope and inspiration, breaking barriers and challenging prejudices, while paving the way for greater inclusivity within football.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

5 Gut-Healthy Foods That Might Be Bad For Your Heart

Published

on

5 Gut-Healthy Foods That Might Be Bad For Your Heart

Probiotic and fibre-rich foods are great for our guts (which, it turns out, influence a lot of our overall health).

But the British Heart Foundation (BHF) have warned that not all of these are as kind to our hearts, even though happier guts usually mean better cardiovascular health.

BHF nutrition lead Tracy Parker said that though, “We encourage everyone to choose foods that can keep their gut microbiome healthy… A lot of these products can contain high levels of salt or sugar.”

Here are five foods they warn to “watch out for”:

Advertisement

1) Kimchi

The fermented cabbage dish is great for our gut microbiomes. It’s packed with probiotics, and it may make your digestive tract an unwelcome space for “bad” gut bacteria.

But, the BHF said, “traditional kimchi is often made with a lot of salt, so it can raise blood pressure if eaten frequently or in large quantities. High blood pressure is known to increase your risk of having a heart attack or stroke”.

They advise trying smaller portions or lower-salt versions.

Advertisement

2) Kombucha

The jury’s still out on whether kombucha, a fermented tea, definitely benefits your gut health, though the BHF says it “can be a healthier alternative to sugary or fizzy drinks and has become a popular choice for people looking to introduce fermented products into their daily routine”.

But, they add, “many commercial kombucha products contain added sugars. Eating too much sugar can lead to weight gain, which in turn can increase the risk of a heart attack or stroke or other cardiovascular disease.”

Stick to kinds with “no added sugar” written on the label if you can.

Advertisement

3) Fruit yoghurt

Plain yoghurt contains live bacteria that could benefit the gut, and it’s also high in calcium, which is linked to a lower risk of bowel cancer.

But flavoured, sweetened, and “fruit” yoghurts often “contain added sugars and may have fewer live cultures than plain versions,” the BHF cautioned.

They reccomend choosing plain yoghurt with “live and active cultures” on the label to “ensure you are buying a low sugar option that is good for your gut”.

Advertisement

If you like, you can add fresh fruit at home.

4) Smoothies

“Smoothies made with whole fruits provide prebiotic fibre that feeds the beneficial gut bacteria and supports digestive health,” the BHF said.

But a mere 150ml counts as one of your five a day, and many of us are drinking more than that.

Advertisement

Additionally, “blending breaks down the structure of fruit, releasing ‘free sugars’ that behave like added sugars in the body and cause faster rises in blood sugar levels,” they shared.

“Regularly consuming too much sugar can lead to weight gain, which can increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, heart and kidney disease.”

Stick to recommended portion sizes and consider adding nuts, which provide protein and fibre that may help to control the impact of the sugars.

5) Sauerkraut

Advertisement

Like kimchi, this fermented cabbage dish can also be high in probiotics.

But it also often runs a little salty, the BHF said, “which may be a concern for anyone watching their blood pressure. Some shop-bought versions are also pasteurised, which removes most of the live bacteria”.

Try “checking the label and eating small portions,” as well as looking for “raw” sauerkraut or those described as containing “live cutlures”.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Israel white phosphorus plant bombed

Published

on

Israel white phosphorus plant bombed

Iran has bombed a chemical compound linked to Israel’s white phosphorus production, finally delivering a scrap of consequences to Israel – unlike the entire international community.

White phosphorus is a chemical substance which ignites instantly upon contact with oxygen. It’s incredibly hard to extinguish and sticks to surfaces like clothes and skin. White phosphorus is extremely harmful to people, no matter the route of exposure. It causes deep and severe burns – often down to the bone, breathing problems, and burning of the eyes and respiratory tract.

Israel struck

An Iranian ballistic missile made direct contact with the ICL (Israeli Chemicals Ltd) Rotem chemical complex in the Negev on 25 March. It caused a large blast and a fire near the site.

The facility is located in the Rotem Industrial Zone near Dimona. It houses infrastructure belonging to several industrial and technology companies.

Social media users geolocated the missile impact site to the facility, and the missile damaged the structure.

Importantly, ICL has factories all over the world, including another chemical plant in St Louis, Missouri, which also produces white phosphorus for both the US and Israeli armies.

Karma

The Canary has previously reported on the shady business of ICL – which the company was not happy with, by the way.

Advertisement

So it seems like a healthy dose of karma that one of its war-crime producing factories has now been bombed.

The human body absorbs white phosphorus, causing dysfunction in multiple organs, including the liver, kidneys, and heart.

It burns at more than 800 degrees Celsius (nearly 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit). That is high enough to melt metal.

Advertisement

Importantly though:

The incendiary effects of white phosphorous can cause death or cruel injuries that result in lifelong suffering.

The use of chemical weapons, such as white phosphorus, in civilian areas is a war crime for exactly this reason.

According to the World Health Organisation:

The use of white phosphorus may violate Protocol III (on the use of incendiary weapons) of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCCW) in one specific instance: if it is used, on purpose, as an incendiary weapon directly against humans in a civilian setting.

So far, Israel has used white phosphorus in both Gaza and Lebanon as far back as 2023.

Advertisement

Of course, the majority of the international community didn’t give a shit when little children were burnt alive.

But when Israel is using weapons that literally melt off children’s faces – we have to ask why it’s only Iran, and only now, that anyone has bothered to take a stand.

Strategic military targets

For 30 years, Netanyahu has been banging on about Iran being two weeks away from having nuclear weapons. Of course, he has zero proof for these claims.

Yet Israel has had nuclear weapons since 1969, and has refused both inspections and safeguards from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Advertisement

We also have years’ worth of evidence of Israel (not Iran) indiscriminately attacking civilians with all kinds of weapons. Yet somehow, the Epstein class want us to believe Iran is the bad guy?

Now it turns out that Iran is destroying the real weapons of mass destruction – Israel’s.

Where international law, morals, conscience, and even the United Nations have failed, Iran has stepped in.

There is only one thing Israel does well – and that is playing the victim. So I won’t be surprised when we see an official Israeli broadcast telling us that bombing an illegal chemical weapons factory is antisemitic.

But the truth is that while the majority of the international community has collectively sat on its arse and let Israel murder innocent people, Iran has taken out the chemical weapons production of an illegal, apartheid regime. It deserves a Nobel Peace Prize.

More than Trump does, at least.

Featured image via Mahmood OD | محمود عودة/YouTube

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025