Crypto World
Bitcoin holds $66K as Iran ground operation talk builds
A new report about possible US ground action in Iran has added fresh tension to global markets.
Summary
- Washington Post said planners reviewed Iran ground raid options while Bitcoin held near $66,500 Sunday.
- Bitcoin stayed flat through Sunday trading as investors waited for traditional markets to reopen overnight.
- Officials kept diplomacy in focus even as reports outlined possible raids near Iran’s Kharg Island.
Bitcoin stayed near $66,500 on Sunday, but traders are watching whether broader risk assets react more sharply when US markets reopen.
The Washington Post reported that the Pentagon is preparing options for ground operations in Iran that could last for weeks. The planning includes Special Operations forces and conventional infantry, though it remains unclear whether President Donald Trump would approve that step.
The reported options include moves against Kharg Island and other coastal targets near the Strait of Hormuz. The report described the planning as limited raids rather than a full invasion, with US officials weighing how far to push military pressure while the war enters its fifth week.
Even with those reports, public statements from top officials still point to a diplomatic track. On March 26 that Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the war should last “weeks, not months” and that the United States could meet its goals without ground troops, even as contingency plans stay in place.
At the same time, regional diplomacy has not ended. The Associated Press reported that mediators gathered in Pakistan for talks aimed at ending the monthlong war, even as fighting continued and both sides kept pressure on key energy and security routes.
Bitcoin holds steady as traders wait for market reaction
Bitcoin showed a muted reaction over the weekend. It traded at about $66,561 on Sunday, with a narrow intraday range, after earlier war-related swings pushed the asset below $69,000 during the past week.
That price action fits a recent pattern. Earlier this month crypto markets sold off when conflict headlines intensified, while other reports this week showed Bitcoin losing ground as risk appetite weakened.
Crypto World
Cardano Price Prediction: ChatGPT Projects ADA to $1 as Pepeto Targets 100x While ETH and SOL Correct
Governor Newsom just signed an executive order banning state officials from profiting on prediction markets, drawing a hard line against insider trading.
The cardano price prediction just received a boost from ChatGPT projecting ADA to $1 as an “undervalued comeback” play. But the real story is that Pepeto’s verified exchange is pulling in capital faster than any presale this cycle.
As the Binance listing approaches, securing a position in the Pepeto presale is the smartest move a trader can make. More than $8 million raised and analysts projecting 100x confirm this is the strongest entry of the cycle.
ChatGPT predicted that ADA could reach $1 by year end, calling Cardano an “undervalued comeback” with brand recognition, exchange liquidity, and a large holder base ready to re-engage according to ICOBench.
At current levels around $0.249, a move to $1 represents a 4x that ChatGPT described as “a relatively modest market cap expansion compared to previous cycles.” According to Yahoo Finance, AI models project ETH between $3,000 and $18,000 and SOL up to $800 in bull scenarios.
The cardano price prediction confirms the cycle is building, and the presale entries at verified exchanges are where the returns that reshape lives actually live.
Where the AI Forecasts Point and Where the Real Returns Build
Pepeto: The Exchange Where 100x Is Projected as the Cardano Price Prediction Confirms the Bull Setup
The $1 target confirms the comeback is building, but the information gap where insiders know what outside investors do not is still one of the most persistent problems in crypto, and it shows up in prediction market betting, token unlocks, and liquidity structures designed to benefit early insiders. Pepeto was built specifically to close that gap at the trading level.
When you evaluate a new token, the contract contains information most investors never see. Pepeto’s exchange reads all of that and confirms safety in plain terms before you commit a single dollar.
The zero fee execution on PepetoSwap means committed capital stays fully working, the multi chain delivery moves tokens without deducting a cent, and the project auditor rejects anything that fails its safety scan, all verified by SolidProof. The same founder whose first meme coin reached $11 billion on zero infrastructure engineered this exchange with a senior operator from Binance’s listing division.
At $0.000000186, analysts project 100x as the Binance listing opens, and 191% APY staking compounds your position while the window narrows. That $1 target is a 4x over 9 months, respectable for a $9 billion cap, but the presale entry at Pepeto is where the 100x math lives and the listing is approaching fast.
Ethereum (ETH)
ETH trades at $2,001 per CoinMarketCap, holding the psychological $2,000 level as the Glamsterdam hard fork approaches.
Standard Chartered targets $7,500 by year end, a 3.7x that rewards patience, while Pepeto at presale targets the returns that ETH at $240 billion will not replicate from here.
Solana (SOL)
SOL trades at $82.45 per CoinDesk, consolidating within the $80 to $85 range as Goldman Sachs holds a $108 million SOL ETF stake.
Grok AI targets $210 to $290 by December, a 3x from current levels, strong infrastructure value, while presale entries are where the cycle defining 100x returns are built and Pepeto offers that exact math before the Binance listing opens.
The Cardano Price Prediction Confirms the Comeback and the Wallets Inside Pepeto Are Already Positioned
The whale wallets building Pepeto positions right now at six zeros are the same wallets that will be selling to latecomers at 50x the price after listing day, and the only decision left is whether you buy from the presale today or buy from those whales six months from now at a price that makes this moment feel like a dream.
ADA at $0.01 turned $1,000 into $310,000 for the wallets that acted early. Visit the Pepeto official website and enter before this stage closes.
Click To Visit Pepeto Website To Enter The Presale
FAQs
Why is the cardano price prediction relevant to presale entries?
The cardano price prediction at $1 confirms the bull cycle building, and Pepeto’s verified exchange with 100x projected from the Binance listing is where the returns that ADA’s $9 billion cap is past delivering actually live.
How does the cardano price prediction compare to Pepeto’s potential?
ADA targets $1 for a 4x over 9 months per ChatGPT, while Pepeto targets 100x from presale as the Binance listing opens, and the Pepeto official website is where the entry is still available.
Is the cardano price prediction only for patient holders?
The cardano price prediction rewards patience with 4x over 12 months, but Pepeto at presale with the Pepe builder and a Binance listing offers the returns that reshape a financial life from one position.
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
Crypto World
BNP Paribas Rolls Out 6 Crypto ETNs Under Strict Retail Access Rules
BNP Paribas is expanding its digital asset footprint, rolling out six new crypto-linked exchange-traded notes (ETNs). The products offer indirect exposure to the price movements of digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.
For Europe’s largest bank by assets, the launch represents a significant escalation in its strategy to bridge traditional finance with the crypto ecosystem.
What Investors Need to Know About BNP’s New ETNs
However, European compliance realities heavily gate the rollout. The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) mandates the bank to enforce strict investor protection protocols.
The ETNs will be made available across its broader customer base, including private banking, entrepreneurial, and digital-first “Hello bank” clients.
“These ETNs are regulated products that offer exposure to the performance of crypto-assets through an indirect investment, without the need for direct purchase or holding of Bitcoin or Ether. These securities are issued by recognized asset managers, selected by BNP Paribas for their solidity and risk management systems,” the bank stated.
However, access is decidedly not an unstructured free-for-all. Retail clients will face rigorous appropriateness tests to verify their understanding of high-risk, highly volatile markets before gaining access to execution.
Crucially for investors, the product’s structure demands careful risk assessment.
Physically backed crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) hold the underlying Bitcoin or Ethereum in specialized cold storage custody. In contrast, these ETNs are structured as unsecured debt securities issued by the bank.
While they offer seamless synthetic exposure to the price movements of single cryptocurrencies or broader digital asset baskets, buyers are fundamentally taking on BNP Paribas’ credit risk.
The new retail push comes just a month after BNP successfully launched a tokenized share class of a French-domiciled money market fund on the public Ethereum blockchain. This launch signals that the bank’s digital asset ambitions now extend well beyond institutional plumbing.
BNP’s calculated launch coincides with a distinct regulatory thaw around the globe for crypto-related products.
The UK Financial Conduct Authority’s pivotal October 2025 reversal highlights this shift. Last year, the regulator allowed crypto ETNs to return to British retail trading screens after a multi-year ban.
Ultimately, this shows that traditional financial institutions are distinct investment vehicles for safely capturing retail demand for Web3 volatility.
The post BNP Paribas Rolls Out 6 Crypto ETNs Under Strict Retail Access Rules appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Bittensor ecosystem tokens’ value hits $1.5 billion as TAO rockets 90% in March
Bittensor’s TAO has rallied 90% so far this month, and the tokens in its ecosystem are running up even harder.
The network’s subnet token category reached a combined market cap of $1.47 billion on Monday, with $118 million in 24-hour trading volume, according to CoinGecko data.
The surge follows TAO’s own run from $180 to above $332 in March, but the subnet tokens are where the real action is. Templar, the token for Subnet 3, gained 444% in 30 days. OMEGA Labs rose 440%. Level 114 added 280%. BitQuant gained 230%. Even the larger subnet tokens posted significant returns, with Chutes up 54% and Targon gaining 166%.
Bittensor is a decentralized network that creates marketplaces for artificial intelligence. Instead of one company building and controlling AI models, Bittensor incentivizes a global network of participants to contribute computing power, data, and machine learning models in exchange for TAO, the network’s native token.
The network is divided into specialized sub-networks called subnets, each focused on a different AI task, from training language models to running compute infrastructure to cybersecurity analysis. There are currently 128 active subnets, each with its own token whose value is tied directly to the amount of TAO staked into it.
Several catalysts contributed to these moves of the Bittensor’s ecosystem tokens.
Subnet 3 produced Covenant-72B, a large language model trained permissionlessly across Bittensor’s decentralized network by over 70 contributors using commodity internet hardware.
The model was trained on 1.1 trillion tokens and achieved a 67.1 MMLU score, confirmed in a March 2026 arXiv paper. That puts it in competitive range with Meta’s Llama 2 70B, a model built by one of the most well-resourced AI labs in the world. (MMLU, or Massive Multitask Language Understanding, is a standardized test for AI models that scores them across 57 academic subjects.)
Subnet 3, called Templar, is Bittensor’s decentralized AI training network. Miners contribute GPU compute power and compete to produce useful training gradients for large language models, while validators evaluate the quality of their contributions and distribute TAO rewards accordingly.
Think of it as a way to train AI models the same way bitcoin mines blocks, with distributed participants around the world contributing hardware and getting paid for useful work.
Elsewhere, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and investor Chamath Palihapitiya endorsed Bittensor’s approach on the All-In Podcast on March 20, framing decentralized AI training as complementary to proprietary models. Coming from the CEO whose blog post earlier this month briefly helped reverse a tech stock selloff, the endorsement carried weight beyond the usual crypto echo chamber.
How subnet tokens work
The subnet token mechanics explain why the gains are so outsized relative to TAO itself.
Since Bittensor launched dynamic TAO in February 2025, each subnet operates its own automated market maker with a native token whose valuation is determined by the TAO staked into that subnet’s reserves. When TAO appreciates, every subnet’s reserve becomes more valuable, inflating token prices and attracting more stakers. The relationship is reflexive and amplifies moves in both directions.
With TAO at roughly $3 billion in market cap and individual subnet tokens ranging from $1 million to $137 million, the subnet tokens function as leveraged bets on the parent protocol.
The network plans to expand from 128 to 256 active subnets later this year, which would bring a new wave of token launches.
A potential regulatory decision on converting the Grayscale TAO Trust into a spot ETF could provide institutional access by late 2026. And Digital Currency Group subsidiary Yuma is already contributing to 14 different subnets, suggesting the smart money is treating this as infrastructure rather than speculation.
Whether the subnet rally sustains depends on whether Bittensor keeps producing competitive AI models or whether Covenant-72B was a one-off that got lucky timing with a Huang endorsement.
Crypto World
Here’s Why Buyers Are Scrambling to Buy DSNT Before the Presale Window Ends
Bitcoin-focused digital asset treasuries (DATs) have slowed down their BTC purchases, with Strategy as the sole buyer making large purchases. Strategy has been commanding most of the purchases over the last 30 days, while other firms hold off. This shows a collapse in broad corporate demand for Bitcoin as volatility continues to spike.
Retail focus, on the other hand, is shifting towards DeepSnitch AI (DSNT). This AI market intelligence platform has truly earned its spot as the best crypto to buy now due to its utility, fueled by five smart AI agents.
At the moment, DeepSnitch AI has raised more than $2.609 million, with the token only going for $0.04699. The amount raised in just a short span shows many buyers are now rushing to buy DSNT before the token launches.
Strategy could be the only major corporate BTC buyer left standing
Strategy is the only DAT buying Bitcoin aggressively right now, highlighting concerns swirling around Bitcoin’s corporate demand. According to a recent report, Strategy purchased 45,000 BTC, while all other corporate firms bought around 1,000.
This highlights radical market structure change with the increasing corporate trend now virtually relying on the services of one company. The change stems from the recent crash across Bitcoin, which traded at $65,848 after losing over 50% of its value in six months, falling from an all-time high of $126,200.
2 days before launch: DeepSnitch AI buyers are running out of time to accumulate DSNT
1. DeepSnitch AI: Here’s why no one wants to miss out on this AI crypto as March 31 TGE knocks at the door
Crypto trading requires access to accurate market intelligence. But access to such information is often limited to elite investors, such as institutional investors, and costs a fortune.
However, DeepSnitch AI gives you access to such information without breaking the bank. At just $0.04699, you can purchase DSNT to gain access to profit-ready trading signals.
The DeepSnitch AI platform scans social and on-chain data, combining it to turn it into actionable intelligence. This explains why the platform is gaining widespread attention despite being just in presale.
The well-designed interface is also a marvel for investors who see DeepSnitch AI as the next big thing in crypto market analytics.
With more than $2.609 million now raised, DeepSnitch AI is accelerating fast towards launch. The token is set to start trading on Uniswap after the March 31 TGE, which is already confirmed. This leaves a short window for investors to buy DSNT before it launches.
2. Shiba Inu burn rate plunges as price drops
According to data from Coingecko, Shiba Inu (SHIB) traded at $0.000005758 on March 27, after a 1.8% dip on the day. The recent drop adds to Shiba Inu’s bearish momentum following increased volatility across the crypto market.
Additionally, the Shiba Inu’s burn rate has dipped by 95.93% according to data from Shibburn. This indicates that activity around this meme coin is dropping. SHIB token burns reduce circulating supply to boost prices, but now investors seem to have abandoned the model as the price plunges.
3. MemeCore defies crypto market crash as price remains steady
MemeCore (M) defied the latest crypto market slump as the crypto posted gains on a generally red day for crypto. As of the time of writing, MemeCore traded at $2.20 after a 4.4% surge.
The recent rally adds to MemeCore’s bullish run as the crypto recorded nearly 30% gains over the past week. However, momentum could slow down as the RSI on the daily chart shows that this crypto is overbought.
The bottom line
DeepSnitch AI has now entered the last days before launch. With only 2 days to go, early buyers are running out of time to buy DSNT before the presale window ends.
DSNT is now priced at $0.04669, giving buyers a cheap entry point into a crypto seen to be the next 100x moonshot. The more than 51 million DSNT staked so far also indicate strong investor participation in DeepSnitch AI staking.
Visit the official website for more information, and join X and Telegram for community updates.
FAQs
1. What is the AI crypto that will explode?
Considering its utility, solid performance, and expected after-launch adoption, DeepSnitch AI seems to be the AI crypto set to explode in 2026. Many buyers are now targeting a 100x rally for this crypto.
2. When will DSNT launch?
DeepSnitch AI (DSNT) is set to hold a TGE on March 31, after which trading will begin on Uniswap before CEX and DEX listings follow through.
3. Which AI is the most accurate for trading?
DeepSnitch AI uses five AI agents to convert raw on-chain data into actionable market intelligence. As a result, the platform provides accurate and real-time crypto market insights vital for making trading moves similar to whales and insiders.
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
Crypto World
Inside Aave’s governance battle as DeFi giant prepares for upgrade
For months, Aave, one of decentralized finance’s (DeFi) largest lending protocols, has been at the center of a very public debate about what it is supposed to be.
At the core, much of the community wants the network to be a decentralized financial layer governed by token holders, while a fraction of it warns that it is evolving toward a more coordinated model shaped by major contributors.
In simple terms, the debate is about whether Aave should remain a neutral, open platform anyone can build on, or move toward a more structured model where key contributors play a bigger role in shaping products and capturing revenue — a shift that could impact how decentralized the protocol is and who benefits from its growth.
After a turbulent stretch marked by governance disputes, contributor exits and a sweeping strategic overhaul, the founder of the main developer firm supporting the network, Stani Kulechov, is framing the moment not as a breakdown, but as a necessary evolution.
“We’ve been doing this for almost a decade,” the Aave Labs founder told CoinDesk. “Finance is a big set of infrastructure… it takes time to replace.”
A debate that started with fees
The latest chapter began late last year with what seemed like a technical issue: interface fees.
In December 2025, discussions over whether revenue generated by Aave’s front-end interfaces should flow back to the DAO — the decentralized autonomous organization that the decentralized autonomous organization that oversees Aave’s governance and treasury — exposed deeper disagreements about value capture. The DAO pushed back against proposals that would divert fees away from its treasury, surfacing tensions over incentives and control that had been building for years.
Those tensions escalated in February when Aave Labs introduced a proposal called “Aave Will Win.”
At its core was a simple idea: all revenue generated by Aave-branded products should ultimately flow back to the DAO. The proposal leaned toward a more coordinated approach between the protocol and the products built around it. “We’re becoming token-centric… but we recognize the value comes from both the protocol layer and the product layer,” Kulechov said.
Aave Labs is a key development contributor but does not control the DAO, which is governed by token holders; however, its proposals and products can influence how value flows through the ecosystem, including revenue directed to the DAO treasury.
Rather than resolving tensions, the proposal intensified them.
In early March, the Aave Chain Initiative (ACI), one of the DAO’s most active governance groups, announced it would shut down after clashing with Aave Labs over the plan. The group had driven a majority of governance activity over the past several years, making its departure particularly notable.
The dispute centered on concerns that the proposal blurred the line between independent DAO governance and the influence of major contributors. Some critics argued that the voting process raised questions about how decentralized decision-making truly is in practice.
ACI’s exit followed the earlier departure of BGD Labs, a key engineering contributor behind Aave v3, which cited strategic disagreements. Together, the moves highlighted a recurring tension in decentralized systems: while protocols are governed onchain, much of the development and coordination still depends on a relatively small group of contributors.
Kulechov, however, sees the churn as part of a normal cycle.
“I don’t think it changes much… this is very normal,” he said, pointing to similar transitions throughout Aave’s history.
A technical upgrade in the background
Running parallel to the governance overhaul is Aave’s next major protocol upgrade, known as v4. The upgrade has been in development for roughly two years and is now nearing launch after an extended period of security testing and governance review. While separate from the recent governance disputes, it represents one of the most significant technical changes to the protocol to date.
At a high level, v4 is expected to introduce a more modular architecture that allows new use cases and integrations to be built more easily on top of Aave’s core infrastructure. The design also aims to improve capital efficiency and expand the types of assets that can be used within the protocol.
While v4 itself has not been the central point of dispute, its rollout comes as the DAO continues to debate how value generated from new products and infrastructure should be distributed across the ecosystem.
Its rollout comes at a moment when Aave is not just refining its governance and economic model, but also upgrading the underlying system itself — setting the stage for its next phase of growth.
DeFi’s next phase
The debate around Aave comes as the broader DeFi sector faces renewed scrutiny.
After the explosive growth of previous cycles, activity has cooled, and questions about the sector’s long-term relevance have resurfaced. Critics point to governance disputes and declining yields as signs that the model may be faltering.
Kulechov disagrees. “DeFi is stronger than ever,” he said, pointing to tens of billions in deposits still locked across the ecosystem.
What is changing, he argues, is where growth will come from. Rather than purely crypto-native use cases, the next phase of DeFi is likely to be driven by real-world financial activity — from institutional lending to tokenized assets.
“Every bank has a digital asset team,” he said. “Once you tokenize assets, you need utilities.”
In that vision, DeFi doesn’t replace traditional finance overnight. Instead, it becomes part of its infrastructure — embedded in the backend of fintech platforms and financial institutions.’
Aave’s recent governance disputes and contributor changes highlight an ecosystem in transition.
Efforts to evolve the ecosystem have introduced new coordination challenges, even as they reflect a broader shift across DeFi where protocols try to align with the applications built on top of them.
“This is just part of building better financial systems,” Kulechov said.
Read more: Aave labs proposes ‘Aave Will Win’ plan to send 100% of product revenue to DAO
Crypto World
World assets sells $65M WLD as token hits fresh pressure
World Foundation disclosed that its token issuance unit, World Assets, completed $65 million in over-the-counter sales of WLD tokens.
Summary
- World Assets sold 239 million WLD tokens for $65 million at about $0.2719 per token.
- WLD traded near $0.27 after hitting a record low of $0.2444 earlier during Saturday session.
- A July 2026 unlock will cover 52.5% of supply, equal to 169% of float currently.
The update came as WLD traded near its recent low and as the market watched future token supply.
World Assets said it sold WLD tokens to four counterparties over the past week. The first settlement took place on March 20, and the average sale price came to about $0.2719 per token.
That pricing means the sales covered roughly 239 million WLD tokens in total. World Foundation also said $25 million worth of the sold tokens carry a six-month lockup period, while the remaining settlements will move through a designated World Assets multisig wallet.
According to the disclosure, World Assets will use the proceeds for core operations, research and development, orb manufacturing, and ecosystem development. The statement gave the market a clearer view of how the foundation plans to use the newly raised funds.
The disclosure followed on-chain data flagged by Lookonchain on March 21. The analytics firm tracked a transfer of 117 million WLD tokens, valued at about $39 million, to Binance and FalconX, with about $35 million in USDC received in return. That transaction appears to match part of the broader OTC activity later disclosed by the foundation.
In addition, the latest sales came at a much lower price than earlier WLD funding rounds. In May 2025, the project raised $135 million through a WLD sale to backers including Andreessen Horowitz and Bain Capital Crypto, at a time when WLD traded near $1.13.
Earlier, in April 2024, the then-named Worldcoin Foundation said it planned to sell between 0.5 million and 1.5 million WLD per week through private placements to institutional trading firms. At that time, WLD traded near $5.43, which places the new average sale price far below earlier levels.
Market watches price pressure and future token supply
WLD traded near $0.27 at publication time after falling to an all-time low of $0.2444 earlier Saturday. The token is down about 97% from its March 2024 peak near $11.82. Its market cap stood near $850 million, while its fully diluted valuation was about $2.7 billion.
The market is also watching a large token unlock scheduled to begin on July 23, 2026, according to DefiLlama data. The event covers about 52.5% of the total 10 billion WLD supply and equals roughly 169% of the current float.
Eightco Holdings, which launched a WLD treasury in September 2025, held 277 million WLD as of March 20.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
Ethereum May Get ‘Flipped’ in 2026 Without Bitcoin’s Involvement
Ether’s (ETH) grip on the cryptocurrency market’s number-two spot is weakening, not because it is getting any closer to overtaking Bitcoin (BTC), but because the stablecoin economy is booming.
Key takeaways:
Ethereum’s No. 2 ranking at risk in 2026
In the past five years, Ether has vastly underperformed its top competitors for the no. 2 spot, primarily Tether’s stablecoin USDT (USDT).
On a five-year rolling basis, ETH’s market capitalization grew by roughly 11.75% to around $240 billion.

In comparison, USDT, the third-largest cryptocurrency, grew 622.50% in the same period, with its market cap reaching over $184 billion. Even XRP (XRP) and USD Coin (USDC) have outperformed Ether’s growth.
As a result, more traders are betting on Ethereum’s flippening in 2026.
On Polymarket’s betting platform, for instance, over 59% of punters placed bets in favor of Ether losing the number-two spot in 2026. These odds were just 17% at the year’s beginning.

Why has Ethereum lagged behind Tether?
Ethereum and Tether grow differently because one is crypto, the other is fiat.
Ethereum’s market value depends largely on ETH’s price rising, and that has been difficult to sustain in 2026 as crypto markets come under pressure from macro headwinds such as US tariffs, the US and Israel vs. Iran war, and fading expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts.
That weakness has also been reflected in institutional demand. US spot Ethereum ETFs saw assets under management fall by about 65%, dropping to $11.76 billion in March from $31.86 billion in October last year, underscoring how the appetite for ETH has decreased over the past few months.

Tether, by contrast, grows when capital flows into stablecoins and investors buy “crypto dollars.” That tends to happen when traders want safety, liquidity, or flexibility instead of exposure to volatile assets like ETH.
Related: AI and stablecoins are winning despite 2026 crypto market slump
The total stablecoin market is now worth $310 billion, compared to around $5 billion in 2020, with Tether’s share at 58%.

Demand for this kind of “dry powder,” capital parked in a dollar-pegged asset while investors wait for better crypto entry points, usually stays firm during risk-off periods.
Ethereum needs a stronger risk appetite to lift ETH’s price, while Tether benefits when investors turn defensive. That helps explain why ETH market cap growth has lagged behind USDT despite remaining one of crypto’s core infrastructure assets.
Can the ETH price fall further in 2026?
From a technical perspective, Ether faces risks of further price declines in 2026.
As of Sunday, it was trading inside what appears to be a “bear flag” pattern, which increases the odds of resolving to the downside, given the price breaks decisively below the structure’s lower trendline.

ETH price risks falling toward the flag’s measured downside target at around $1,250 by June if the breakdown below the lower trend line persists.
Crypto World
Institutions Are Paying Bitcoin Custodians For The Privilege Of Added Risk
Opinion by: Kevin Loaec, CEO of Wizardsardine
For decades, institutions have followed a familiar pattern when managing assets. They choose a large, regulated custodian. Then, institutions transfer responsibility. Institutions rely on the assumption that scale, compliance and insurance equate to safety.
In traditional finance, this approach holds. Transactions are reversible, central banks provide backstops and regulators can intervene. When something breaks, there are mechanisms to absorb, unwind or redistribute the damage.
Bitcoin changes those assumptions completely because it is a bearer asset. Control is defined by cryptographic keys, and not account credentials. Every single transaction is final. There is no authority that can freeze, reverse, or recover funds once they move onchain. Yet, many institutions still approach Bitcoin using the same mental model they apply to more traditional assets.
The result is a quiet contradiction. Institutions pay custodians large fees for the appearance of safety. They also accept the risks that Bitcoin was designed to mitigate.
When control is outsourced, risk concentrates
Custodial models are built on delegation. Assets are pooled. Keys are shared, abstracted or held behind layers of internal controls. Governance lives offchain. It’s enforced through policies, approvals and service agreements rather than the asset itself.
From an organizational perspective, this can feel sensible because responsibility is externalized. Liability appears contained and insurance is cited as a backstop.
Bitcoin does not recognize delegation. If keys are compromised, lost or misused, there is no external authority that can intervene. Insurance coverage is often partial, capped or conditional.
As a result, in a systemic failure, clients face the same bottleneck. There is a single custodian holding assets for many parties, with limited ability to make everyone whole.
This is not a theoretical concern. Concentrated custody creates honeypots. Honeypots attract failure. Failures can occur through technical compromise, internal error, regulatory action or operational breakdown. In Bitcoin, concentrating control does not reduce risk. It does the opposite: Risk is amplified.
The industry has already seen how this plays out. Large, centralized custody models have failed before. They’ve left consumers, businesses and counterparties tied up in lengthy recovery processes. Limited visibility, with uneven outcomes.
Governance cannot live outside the asset
The core misunderstanding is not technical. It is organizational. Institutions are accustomed to enforcing governance through accounts, permissions, emails and internal workflows. That approach works when assets themselves are controlled by intermediaries. In Bitcoin, governance that lives outside the asset is, at best, advisory.
If an institution does not control the keys, it does not control the asset. Boards and auditors are right to be wary of fragile set-ups. A model where one individual can move funds is indefensible. Regulators are also right to push back against unclear control structures.
The choice is not between a single-key wallet and full custodial outsourcing. Bitcoin allows governance to be enforced directly at the protocol level. Spending conditions, approval thresholds, delays and recovery paths can be encoded into the wallet. Control becomes structural rather than procedural. The network enforces the rules, not a vendor’s backend or a support desk.
Policy-driven custody changes the risk model
Modern Bitcoin scripting makes it possible to design custody around real organizational needs.
An institution can require multiple stakeholders to approve transactions. It can enforce time delays. It can define recovery paths if keys are lost or personnel change. It can separate day-to-day operations from emergency controls. These rules are enforced onchain, deterministically, every time. All of this fundamentally alters the risk profile.
Related: The crypto events that reshaped the industry in 2025
Instead of trusting a custodian to behave correctly under stress, institutions rely on systems that behave predictably by design. Instead of outsourcing risk to insurance policies, they reduce the likelihood of catastrophic failure in the first place. It is a matter of engineering.
The insurance narrative deserves scrutiny
Custodial insurance is often presented as the ultimate safeguard when in practice, it is frequently misunderstood. Several high-profile custody failures have shown that insurance coverage often falls short of client expectations, either due to coverage caps, exclusions or prolonged claims processes.
Large custodians insure pooled assets, and coverage limits rarely scale linearly with assets under custody. Exclusions are also common and payouts depend largely on the nature of the incident, and the custodian’s internal controls. In a systemic event, insurance does not eliminate risk, it distributes a fraction of it.
By contrast, individually controlled, policy-driven Bitcoin wallets are far easier to underwrite. Risk is isolated, controls are transparent and failure scenarios are bounded. For insurers, this is a simpler and more predictable model. The process of insurance works best when it complements strong controls, not when it compensates for their absence.
Sovereignty is operational, not philosophical
Vendor dependence introduces another layer of institutional risk that is not often known. Custodial outages, policy changes, or regulatory interventions can leave funds temporarily inaccessible. Exiting a custodian relationship can be slow, expensive and operationally complex, particularly for organizations operating across jurisdictions.
In practice, this has already happened through withdrawal freezes, compliance-driven access restrictions and service outages that left clients unable to move assets precisely when timing mattered most.
With onchain, open-source custody systems, the software provider is not the gatekeeper. If a service disappears, the institution retains control. Interfaces can change and providers can be replaced. The asset remains accessible because control lives on the blockchain, not inside a company’s infrastructure. This is not an argument against service providers but an argument for removing them from the critical path of asset control.
Trust the protocol, not the promise
Bitcoin offers institutions something rare: the ability to hold a high-value asset with rules that are transparent, enforceable and independent of any single counterparty.
Yet many institutions still prefer familiar narratives over structural safety. Log-in screens feel safer than scripts. Brands feel safer than math, and insurance sounds safer than prevention.
This level of comfort can come at a huge cost.
Institutions should not pay for the illusion of safety while absorbing unnecessary counterparty risk. Bitcoin allows governance, recoverability and control to be built directly into how assets are held. The technology is mature. The tools exist.
What remains is the willingness to abandon custody models that belong to a different financial system.
Opinion by: Kevin Loaec, CEO of Wizardsardine.
This opinion article presents the author’s expert view, and it may not reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. This content has undergone editorial review to ensure clarity and relevance. Cointelegraph remains committed to transparent reporting and upholding the highest standards of journalism. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research before taking any actions related to the company.
Crypto World
Bitcoin stabilizes at $66K as SIREN jumps and PI rebounds
Bitcoin held above $66,000 through most of the weekend, even as some traders expected sharper moves.
Summary
- Bitcoin stayed above $66,000 for 36 hours after rebounding from Friday’s four-week low near $65,500.
- Major altcoins showed limited movement, while Bitcoin dominance slipped to 56% and market cap stalled.
- SIREN surged 13% to $1.80, while PI rebounded above $0.18 after recent weakness.
The steady action followed a volatile week that pushed the asset from near $72,000 to a four-week low before it recovered.
Most large-cap altcoins tracked Bitcoin’s calmer pace. Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and BNB posted only small moves, while a few smaller tokens recorded wider swings.
Bitcoin entered the weekend after several quick moves during the week. It traded above $70,000 last weekend, then dropped toward $67,500 on Monday as broader market tension returned.
The asset then climbed close to $72,000 after US President Donald Trump said the United States had reached a “de-escalation deal” with Iran. That move faded after Iran denied the claim, which pushed Bitcoin back toward $69,000.
Buyers lifted Bitcoin again to the $72,000 area on Wednesday morning. That rebound did not last, and another rejection followed later in the week.
By Friday, Bitcoin had fallen to around $65,500, its lowest level in four weeks. It then recovered and stayed above $66,000 for roughly 36 hours, showing a more stable pattern than some weekend forecasts had suggested.
Market cap and dominance stay under pressure
Despite the recovery from Friday’s low, Bitcoin’s market capitalization remained near $1.330 trillion. Its share of the total crypto market also slipped, with dominance standing at 56% on CoinGecko data.
The broader crypto market showed little change during the same period. Total market capitalization stayed near $2.370 trillion, which pointed to a pause in momentum across major digital assets.
Large-cap altcoins mostly moved in a narrow range. ETH, XRP, SOL, and DOGE posted small losses, while BNB, TRX, BCH, XMR, and HYPE recorded modest gains.
That price action suggested traders remained cautious after the earlier swings. The market did not show strong follow-through in either direction by Sunday.
SIREN surges while PI posts a modest rebound
Among smaller tokens, SIREN remained one of the most active names. The token gained another 13% over the past 24 hours and traded around $1.80.
Its recent trading range has been wide. SIREN had climbed to $3.60 earlier in the week before falling to $1.00, then rebounding again over the following days.
Pi Network’s PI token also moved higher, though at a slower pace. It rose more than 3% on the day and traded near $0.18 after slipping below $0.175.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
Hyperliquid volume jumps but TradFi still rules commodity depth
Onchain commodity trading is drawing more attention as traders look for round-the-clock access to oil, gold, and index products.
Summary
- Hyperliquid recorded $5.4 billion in macro perpetual volume as silver, oil, gold and indices led.
- Weekend access kept onchain markets open while traditional commodity venues stayed closed to active traders.
- Thin liquidity and wider spreads still keep onchain commodity trading below institutional size and execution.
Recent volume data shows that demand is rising, but limited liquidity still keeps traditional markets ahead in scale and execution.
Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 market reached a new record on March 23. The platform posted about $5.4 billion in perpetual futures volume across commodities and macro assets. Silver led activity with $1.3 billion, while WTI crude oil reached $1.2 billion. Brent crude oil recorded $940 million, and gold posted $558 million.
The rise in volume points to broader interest in onchain macro trading. Equity indices such as the Nasdaq and S&P 500 also drew activity. This shows that traders are using decentralized markets for more than crypto-linked positions.
One of the main strengths of onchain trading is constant market access. Traditional exchanges close for part of the weekend, but decentralized platforms remain open. That gap gives traders a way to respond to geopolitical events and macro news in real time.
Theo chief investment officer Iggy Ioppe said the market is changing. He said,
”Previously, onchain commodity futures were mostly a venue for crypto-native investors, that is no longer the whole story.”
He also said weekend oil futures volume has moved above $1 billion per day while traditional markets remain closed.
This shift has started to shape how prices form outside normal market hours. Traders can react before legacy venues reopen. That creates a role for onchain markets during off-hours, even if most large volume still sits elsewhere.
Despite higher activity, liquidity remains a core issue. Traditional venues still offer deeper order books, tighter spreads, and better execution for large trades. That makes it harder for onchain platforms to handle institutional-sized orders without moving prices.
1inch co-founder Sergej Kunz said traditional venues still lead in liquidity and execution quality. MEXC Research chief analyst Shawn Young also said the sector remains in an early stage, with gaps in price aggregation and market structure still unresolved.
Growth continues as traders test macro exposure onchain
Market participants still expect further growth. Gold and oil have led the current push, but other asset classes may follow as traders grow more comfortable with onchain access to macro products.
Ioppe said trust in weekend pricing may support more activity over time. As more traders use these markets during off-hours, volume and open interest can grow together. That process may help onchain commodity trading expand, even while traditional markets remain the main source of depth.
-
NewsBeat4 days agoManchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
-
News Videos4 days agoParliament publishes latest register of MPs’ financial interests
-
Sports6 days agoRemo Stars and Kano Pillars Strengthen Survival Hopes in NPFL
-
Sports6 days agoGary Kirsten Accuses Pakistan Cricket Board Of ‘Interference’, Mohsin Naqvi Responds
-
Business7 days agoNo Winner in March 21 Drawing as Prize Rolls to $133 Million for Next
-
Tech7 days agoGive Your Phone a Huge (and Free) Upgrade by Switching to Another Keyboard
-
Tech7 days agoAI enters the chat: New Seattle dating app relies on tech to facilitate meaningful human connections
-
Business3 days agoInstagram, YouTube Found Responsible for Teen’s Mental Health Struggle in Historic Ruling
-
News Videos6 days agoCh 9 Financial Management Part 1 | Detailed One Shot | Class 12 Business Studies Boards 2026
-
NewsBeat2 days agoThe Story hosts event on Durham’s historic registers
-
NewsBeat4 days agoTesco is selling new Cadbury Dairy Milk bar and people can’t wait to try it
-
Sports6 days ago2026 Kentucky Derby horses, odds, futures, preview, date: Expert who hit 12 Derby-Oaks Doubles enters picks
-
Tech6 days agoSamsung will soon let you control smart home devices from your car’s dashboard
-
Entertainment16 hours agoLana Del Rey Celebrates Her Husband’s 51st Birthday In New Post
-
Entertainment6 days agoCynthia Bailey Dishes on ‘RHOA’ Season 17, Discusses Kandi
-
NewsBeat6 days agoColombian military plane with 110 soldiers onboard crashes following takeoff
-
Fashion5 days agoDoes It Matter What You Wear When You’re Laid Off and Looking?
-
Business5 days agoMore women enter wealth management, but few in advisory roles: study
-
Sports4 days agoFantasy Baseball Week 1 Preview: Top sleeper hitters for both five- and 12-day period led by Munetaka Murakami
-
Politics6 days agoHow Media Platforms Balance Performance and Accessibility in Image Delivery







You must be logged in to post a comment Login