Willie Collum has backed the VAR decision to award Celtic a penalty in the dying moments of their Scottish Premiership clash with Motherwell
Willie Collum has defended both Andrew Dallas and John Beaton following the contentious penalty awarded to Celtic during their match at Fir Park.
The decision to penalise Sam Nicholson for handball ignited widespread debate after the spot kick, converted in the 96th minute, preserved the Hoops’ title aspirations heading into the final day of the campaign, where they defeated Hearts to secure a fifth consecutive Premiership title.
The VAR audio recording has now been made public, revealing Dallas’ insistence that the ball clearly made contact with Nicholson’s hand, which he confirmed to Beaton when the referee sought verification.
Despite supporters questioning how either match official could be certain, head of referees Collum maintains that both had conclusive proof of the handball offence.
“For us there’s clear evidence, particularly the still image,” he told the Sky Sports VAR Review Show. “In our opinion this is clear.”, reports the Daily Record.
“When you strip it back, 95th minute of the match, VAR goes through a clear process. They’re clear it’s a handball.
“When the referee comes over, he agrees. So we fully support the decision.
“The key for me is Nicholson’s hand and arm are already in an unnatural position. It moves further into an unnatural position. The player takes a huge risk when he jumps with his hand in that position.
“It’s not a foul on the Motherwell player. We’ve been consistent with handballs. Falkirk against Hibs, Connor Barron against Falkirk. We believe we’ve been consistent in our approach.
“We felt he wasn’t trying to get his arm out of the position. We didn’t feel he was trying to protect his face, it wasn’t a shot coming at him from a close distance.
“We need to be careful talking about an advantage being gained. It wasn’t a case of trying to avoid contact, or trying to protect his face.Another small point.
“People say ‘support the on-field decision?’ There wasn’t an on-field decision, it was completely missed. We had a decision at the end of an Old Firm where no-one appealed for a handball but it was checked. We have to be thorough.”
When questioned about whether Beaton ought to have consulted Dallas regarding the handball call, Collum responded: “When you bring a ref to the monitor, you’ve already come to the conclusion that it’s hit the hand.
“The ref’s focus has to be to check the position of the arm. He just quickly confirms ‘has it hit the arm?’ You wouldn’t bring him over if it hadn’t.
“There’s three key people here. The VAR, the AVAR and the referee. They see this as a clear error and a punishable handball. It’s crucial they identify that.”
Regarding the penalty Hearts were denied at Fir Park days before, involving Tawanda Mashwanise’s challenge on Alexandros Kyzirids, Collum believed Steven McLean ought to have awarded a spot kick. “The VAR team feel it’s a penalty so they bring the referee over,” he said. “There’s been a bit of a debate about whether this is a clear error. But once the referee comes to the monitor, they expected the penalty to be awarded.
“My personal opinion is that’s a penalty. There’s some debate within refereeing and we’ll discuss it in pre-season. But I feel it should be awarded.
“The VAR process is going to the final degree. The referee has been brought over then VAR shows the angles they’ve based their judgement on.
“They’re the only two angles available. Whether the angles are sufficient, that’s another debate. But can you imagine the criticism if VAR tried to convince the referee?
“Perhaps that contributes to the doubt in the referee’s mind. We’ll need to have discussion with referees and clubs. But in my opinion, the expected outcome is a penalty kick.”







You must be logged in to post a comment Login