Crypto World
Americans Lost $11B to Crypto Scams in 2025, Says FBI
According to the bureau, a large number of minors aged 17 and younger were included in complaints related to crypto or crypto ATMs, resulting in more than $5 million in losses.
The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that Americans’ losses from crypto-related scams increased to more than $11 million in 2025.
In its annual internet crime complaint report released on Monday, the FBI said that cryptocurrency and AI-related scams were “among the costliest” for Americans in 2025, with 181,565 complaints totaling more than $11 billion. According to the bureau, it received more than one million complaints in 2025 reporting losses of about $21 million due to cyber-enabled crimes.
The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center reported that investment scams resulted in the highest percentage of victims reporting losses in crypto as opposed to cash, debit cards, gift cards and other media of exchange. In addition, about 10% of the 13,168 complaints involving cybercrimes targeting minors aged 17 and younger were related to crypto or crypto ATMs, resulting in more than $5 million in losses.
The complaints the FBI received were despite the bureau’s efforts to “identify and notify people who are currently falling victim to cryptocurrency investment fraud” through its Operation Level Up in 2024. Globally, blockchain analytics platform Chainalysis reported in March that illicit addresses received $154 billion in 2025, driven in part by sanctions evasions.
Related: Cambodian lawmakers propose severe prison time for crypto scammers
Scammers use Tron blockchain token to con users using FBI
According to the FBI report, there were 32,424 complaints involved in impersonation of government officials, resulting in about $800 million in losses. However, the report did not mention bureau officials issuing a March notice warning Americans that a token on the Tron blockchain was impersonating the FBI with the goal of obtaining personal information.
Tron users reported receiving a token with the FBI logo claiming that their wallet was “under investigation.” The users were then prompted to enter personal information under the guise of an FBI anti-money-laundering verification to avoid their accounts being frozen.
Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?
BEIJING — China’s ties with countries such as Iran and Russia have raised expectations of a bigger diplomatic role, but Beijing remains focused on protecting its own domestic interests, including global exports.
That stance underpins Beijing’s circumspect acknowledgment of reports that it pushed Iran toward this week’s temporary ceasefire. A New York Times report cited three Iranian officials as saying China played a role, while AFP cited U.S. President Donald Trump.
China has made “active efforts” to end the conflict, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning said Wednesday, when asked by the press about the reports. She emphasized that Foreign Minister Wang Yi had made 26 phone calls to representatives of countries including Russia, Saudi Arabia, Germany and Iran since the U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran began on Feb. 28.
But Beijing stopped short of confirming direct mediation.
China called for an “immediate stop” to military operations after U.S.-Israel strikes against Iran in late February. When asked on March 3 about Iran’s counterattacks, China’s Foreign Ministry did not mention Tehran specifically, urging instead for “all parties” to prevent the conflict from spreading.
“What Beijing did is not really about direct intermediation,” said Zongyuan Zoe Liu, a senior fellow for China studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.
“What Beijing did is, more precisely, broker[ed], facilitated the ceasefire,” she said Friday on CNBC’s “The China Connection. “From that perspective there’s nothing [that has] changed with regards to Beijing’s foreign policy. It does not mean Beijing is becoming more active.”
Instead, she noted Beijing is concerned about the risk of a global downturn from the war that would hurt its export-oriented economy.
Net exports contributed to about one-third of China’s GDP last year, despite heightened U.S. tariffs, leaving its economy exposed to disruptions in global trade.
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva warned Thursday that global growth would slow even if the ceasefire holds, citing lingering uncertainty around the Strait of Hormuz.
The strait handles about one-fifth of global oil supply, connecting the Persian Gulf on the coast of Saudi Arabia with the rest of the world. While China is the primary buyer of Iranian oil and relies on the waterway for just under half of its seaborne oil imports, that represents just 6.6% of China’s total energy consumption.
Still, China faces “immense pressure due to rapidly rising energy costs, and hopes the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened soon,” said Hai Zhao, a director of international political studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a state-affiliated think tank.
As of January, Beijing held enough crude stockpiles to meet demand for three to four months, according to estimates. Data show that Iran has been sending oil through the strait to China since the war began.
However, gasoline prices in China jumped 11% in March from the prior month, and authorities have raised the official domestic gasoline prices twice in six weeks, by a total of 1,580 yuan per metric ton, or about 60 cents per U.S. gallon. The average price in the U.S. has gone up by more than $1 per gallon during that time.
Higher energy costs are also squeezing factory margins, adding to price pressures across China’s manufacturing sector.
Globally traded Brent crude futures remained below $100 a barrel on Friday, despite limited signs of a recovery in shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Recent Iran attacks on a crucial Saudi pipeline have also slashed the kingdom’s oil output, Saudi Arabia’s state news agency said Thursday.
The backdrop
China’s diplomatic positioning builds on its role in restoring diplomatic ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia three years ago, ending three decades of animosity. The move was notable given U.S. interests in the Middle East, while elevating China’s profile in the region.
That history means Beijing can play the role of mediator once both sides are willing to reduce conflict, Zhao said.
But he noted that China lacks the capability or inclination to pressure either side into negotiating. Instead, China’s support gives Pakistan’s mediation efforts more heft, he said.
Pakistan, which shares borders with China and Iran, is set to host Iranian and U.S. leaders in Islamabad this weekend for ceasefire talks. The extent of Beijing’s involvement with the summit remains unclear.
Subscribe now
“We support the mediation efforts by countries including Pakistan,” Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao said this week. She noted Beijing has called on all parties to end hostilities as soon as possible, for regional peace. “China has made active effort to this end.”
In late March, China and Pakistan published a plan for “restoring peace and stability” in the Middle East, including a ceasefire, peace talks and the restoration of normal passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.
Pakistan abstained from voting on a UN Security Council resolution this week that would have encouraged countries to coordinate their defensive efforts in order to reopen the strait. Veto-wielding Security Council members China and Russia objected and planned to issue an alternative resolution.
Iran has made clear that ships must obtain its permission to pass through the strait, Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, CEO of Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., said Thursday in a social media post. “The Strait of Hormuz is not open. Access is being restricted, conditioned and controlled.”
Before the war, Iran had occasionally harassed, attacked or seized vessels transiting the strait as tensions with the U.S. escalated.
“China welcomes any chance to present itself as a constructive, responsible power while the Trump administration is seen as the source of the instability,” CFR’s Liu said.
But she warned that the broader geopolitical dynamics remain unchanged.
“The underlying structural tension between Beijing’s dependence on a rules-based global order and Washington’s growing willingness to disrupt that order remains entirely unresolved,” she said.
“That is the story worth tracking beyond the immediate ceasefire.”
— CNBC’s Asriel Chua contributed to this report.
Japan’s cabinet has approved a draft amendment that would classify cryptocurrencies as financial products, marking a shift in how the country regulates the sector.
The proposal brings crypto assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, a framework used for stocks and other securities, Nikkei reported. If passed during the current parliament session, the law could take effect as early as fiscal 2027.
Until now, Japan has treated crypto mainly as a payment tool under the Payment Services Act. That approach focused on custody, anti-money laundering checks and exchange registration. The new rules would ban insider trading and require issuers to publish annual disclosures.
Penalties would also rise. Operating without registration could bring up to 10 years in prison, up from three, and fines could increase to 10 million yen ($62,800). The Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission would gain broader authority to police the market.
In a press conference, Minister for Financial Services Satsuki Katayama said the move will “expand the supply of growth capital in response to changes in the financial and capital markets, ensuring market fairness, transparency, and the protection of investors.”
Bitcoin treasury firm Nakamoto (NAKA) is resorting to a familiar Wall Street playbook as it looks to lift its beating-down share price and stay on Nasdaq.
The company is seeking approval for a “reverse stock split” that would combine shares at a ratio to be set between 1-for-20 and 1-for-50, according to a preliminary proxy filing (Schedule 14A), as it has seen a collapse in its share price to around $0.22. Prices are down roughly 99% from its May 2025 peak.
A reverse stock split reduces the number of shares outstanding while increasing the share price proportionally, for example turning 20 shares at $0.20 into one share at $4. While it does not change the company’s underlying value, it is commonly used to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s $1 minimum bid requirement and avoid delisting. Nasdaq mandates listed companies to maintain a minimum bid price of $1 per share, and firms that fail to ensure that within a specific period risk being delisted.
Nakamoto recently sold about 5% of its bitcoin holdings, leaving it with 5,058 BTC, pointing to ongoing liquidity management.
Other bitcoin treasury firms have taken similar steps, including Strive Asset Management earlier this year. Most DAT shares have taken a beating in recent months, tracking the collapse in BTC’s spot price to roughly $70,000 from over $126,000 in October.
Alongside the reverse split, the company, in a Form S-3 filing, registered more than 400 million shares for potential resale by existing investors. This does not raise new capital, but creates a large overhang that could weigh on the stock.
The company also has a shelf registration allowing up to roughly $7 billion in future securities issuance. This is separate from an at the market (ATM) program of up to approximately $5 billion, which would allow it to sell newly issued shares directly into the market over time.
Flare published a governance proposal on Thursday that would make it one of the first layer-1 blockchains to capture maximal extractable value (MEV) at the protocol level rather than letting it flow to the small number of specialized actors who profit from transaction ordering across virtually every major chain.
MEV is the revenue that block builders extract by reordering, inserting or censoring transactions within a block. On most blockchains, this value flows to external searchers and builders who effectively impose a hidden tax on ordinary users through front-running, sandwich attacks and arbitrage.
External estimates put annual MEV revenues at tens of millions on networks like Arbitrum, upwards of $500 million on Ethereum, and as much as $1 billion on Solana. Flare’s three-stage proposal would route the revenue into the protocol’s own token economics.
In the first stage, block building moves from individual validators to a designated builder, initially run by the Flare Entity, with a fallback to the current model if the builder is unavailable. In the second, block building moves into Flare Confidential Compute, making the process publicly auditable. The third stage merges the builder and proposer into a single entity, shifting existing validators to a verification role.
The proposal also creates FIRE, the Flare Income Reinvestment Entity to collect revenue from multiple protocol sources including attestation fees, FAsset and Smart Account fees, confidential compute fees and the captured MEV. FIRE’s primary mandate is reducing FLR token supply through open-market buybacks and burns.
Several changes would take effect immediately after approval. Annual FLR inflation would drop to 3% from 5%, with the hard cap cut to 3 billion tokens per year from 5 billion. A 20-fold increase to the base gas fee, from 60 gwei to 1,200 gwei, would raise estimated annual FLR burn from roughly 7.5 million to 300 million at current transaction volumes. Even after the increase, a standard Flare transaction would cost a fraction of a cent.
Flare has deep roots in the XRP ecosystem, having distributed its initial token supply through an airdrop to XRP holders in 2023. Its FAssets system, which has produced over 150 million FXRP, is designed to bring smart contract functionality to assets on blockchains like XRPL that do not natively support it.
The network reports over $160 million in total value locked as of late March 2026, with more than 887,000 active addresses.
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) will publish the March Consumer Price Index (CPI) data on Friday. The report is expected to show a jump in inflation, driven by the upsurge seen in crude Oil prices after the United States (US) and Israel launched a joint attack on Iran.
The monthly CPI is forecast to rise 0.9%, following the 0.3% increase recorded in March, while the annual reading is seen climbing to its highest level since May 2024 at 3.3%, from 2.4% in February. Core CPI figures, which exclude volatile food and energy prices, are expected to come in at 0.3% and 2.7%, on a monthly and yearly basis, respectively.
Since the beginning of the conflict in the Middle East on February 28, the barrel of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is up about 40%, even after the sharp decline seen following the announcement of a two-week ceasefire between the US and Iran earlier this week. In March, WTI gained nearly 50%, rising from about $67 per barrel to settle near $100 by the end of the month.
Previewing the inflation data, “the recent surge in crude prices will be the main factor behind the 0.9% m/m jump in the CPI. The Y/Y rate will leap close to 1pp to 3.3% in March, a two-year-high,” said TD Securities analysts.
“Core inflation will stay shielded from the oil shock for now, rising 0.27% m/m. We look for tariff pass-through to continue playing a role by lifting goods prices. Supercore inflation likely stayed firm at 0.3%,” they added.
What to Expect in the Next CPI Data Report?
CPI figures for March will reflect the impact of high oil prices on inflation, which shouldn’t be surprising. Even if the annual CPI inflation rises 3.3% in March, as forecast, investors could see that as a temporary increase in case they remain confident that Oil prices will come down significantly, with a permanent truce in the Middle East allowing the Strait of Hormuz to remain open.
However, the growing uncertainty about the sustainability of a ceasefire and Iran’s condition to retain control of the strait in a peace agreement complicates the picture and raises doubts about a steady pullback in Oil prices. Hence, the developments in the Middle East are likely to shape inflation expectations, rather than the March CPI reading itself.
The Minutes from the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) March meeting showed that a number of policymakers are already pushing back the timing of potential rate cuts, reflecting lingering concerns that inflation could prove more persistent than expected.
In fact, a large majority flagged the risk that price pressures could stay elevated for longer, particularly if higher Oil prices feed through more broadly.
“Provided that underlying inflation excluding energy remains contained, the Fed can afford to look through the oil-price shock and refrain from raising rates amid a mixed US labor market backdrop,” BBH analysts said.
How Could the US Consumer Price Index Report Affect Eur/USD?
Markets currently see about a 75% chance of the Fed leaving the policy rate unchanged at 3.5%-3.75% by the end of the year, compared to a 17% probability seen on March 9, according to the CME FedWatch Tool.
A stronger-than-forecast monthly CPI print for March might not be able to influence the market pricing of the Fed’s interest-rate outlook in a significant way.
However, if a hot inflation print is combined with a re-escalation of the conflict in the Middle East and growing expectations about the naval activity in the Strait of Hormuz not going back to its pre-war state anytime soon, investors could reassess the probability of a Fed hike in response to persistent inflation. In this scenario, the US Dollar (USD) could gather strength and force EUR/USD to turn south.
Conversely, the USD could remain under bearish pressure – and allow EUR/USD to extend its rebound – in case crude Oil prices continue to come down in a steady way, regardless of the March CPI figures.
In summary, March inflation prints are unlikely to trigger a significant market reaction, while market focus remains on the US-Iran crisis and its impact on Oil prices.
Eren Sengezer, FXStreet European Session Lead Analyst, shares a brief technical outlook for EUR/USD.
“EUR/USD’s near-term technical outlook points to a bullish tilt. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicator on the daily chart climbed above 50 for the first time since the beginning of the US-Iran war and the pair broke above the two-month-old descending trend line.”
“The Fibonacci 50% retracement level of the February-April trend aligns as the next resistance level at 1.1730 ahead of 1.1800 (Fibonacci 61.8% retracement) and 1.1900 (Fibonacci 78.6% retracement). On the downside, the immediate support is located at 1.1650 (Fibonacci 38.2% retracement). In case this support fails, technical sellers could show interest, opening the door for an extended slide toward 1.1560 (Fibonacci 23.6% retracement) and 1.1500 (static level, round level).”
The post US CPI Inflation Set to Jump in March, Putting an End to Gradual Two-Year Decline appeared first on BeInCrypto.
MiCA introduced a unified European crypto market framework with one license valid across 27 countries. Large exchanges like Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase have successfully obtained MiCA licenses for all 27 EU countries.
For smaller companies, however, MiCA is proving to be a different kind of challenge. The regulation functions as a quality filter, but interpretations differ: some argue it removes bad actors, while others contend it disproportionately affects companies without deep capital reserves.
The True Cost of Compliance
The cost breakdown reveals significant barriers to entry. Minimum licensing and compliance costs for crypto startups range from €250,000 to €500,000 for licensing alone, with additional expenses including compliance officer salaries (€80,000–€150,000 annually) and legal fees (€50,000–€200,000). Stablecoin issuers must also maintain a reserve capital of €5 million.
The impact varies considerably by company profile. Venture-backed exchanges treat these costs as manageable business expenses. Bootstrapped startups and small teams encounter substantially higher operational friction. The cumulative cost structure establishes a de facto market entry threshold that advantages capitalized players and disadvantages smaller entrants.
Holger Kuhlmann, speaking at the BeInCrypto expert council, articulated the operational pressure directly:
“A lot of companies are under pressure because they either do not have enough staff to handle the new rules properly or they need to hire more people and that quickly becomes expensive. Many companies have to make a decision between accepting more bureaucracy or taking on the cost and risk of relocation.”
This choice Kuhlmann describes is playing out across Europe. Industry data shows over 40% of crypto exchanges reported difficulty meeting MiCA’s reporting requirements specifically because of high compliance costs. At least 25% of exchanges that applied for MiCA licensing faced delays or rejections over incomplete AML documentation or other paperwork issues.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The Bureaucracy or Relocation Choice
For many smaller firms, relocation increasingly means Vienna. Austria’s Financial Market Authority offers licensing timelines under six months, significantly faster than German timelines. For companies that cannot afford to wait or to hire additional compliance staff, moving becomes the pragmatic economic choice despite the costs of relocation.
Germany’s strict interpretation of MiCA amplifies this pressure considerably. While most EU countries kept the full 18-month transition window that MiCA allowed, Germany shortened its deadline to just 12 months. Less time to prepare means higher costs, more pressure on limited resources, and more companies reaching the conclusion that relocation is preferable to compliance within the German framework.
This pattern has real consequences. Germany’s crypto hub status, as detailed in related analysis on the crypto hub question, depends partly on retaining startup ecosystems. Yet the compliance burden is precisely what pushes those startups elsewhere.
Winners and Losers Under MiCA
The data reveals a stark divide. MiCA-compliant businesses saw a 45% increase in institutional investments compared to non-compliant platforms. Large exchanges with existing institutional relationships, capital reserves, and compliance infrastructure have used MiCA as a moat against smaller competitors.
Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase secured MiCA licenses for all 27 EU countries. For them, MiCA functions as intended: it unified the market and removed uncertainty. The regulation brought legitimacy and enabled them to deepen institutional relationships.
Chris Pliessnig, whose firm Tirox navigated the MiCA transition for multiple clients, acknowledged both sides of the impact: “It opened up the product offering, the service offering, and it brought it to a new level.” That elevation happened—but only for companies with sufficient resources to reach the new level.
The Structural Shift
Germany granted over 30 MiCA licenses, but most went to traditional banks entering crypto for the first time. The startups that once made Berlin and Frankfurt attractive crypto destinations are licensing elsewhere, often in Vienna. The effect is a hollowing out of the startup ecosystem that originally built Germany’s reputation for innovation in digital assets.
One expert observed that Germany risks losing its status as a crypto hub not because of MiCA itself, but because of how strictly it applies the rules. The regulation is uniform across the EU, but enforcement strictness is not.
The Path Forward Remains Unclear
Smaller companies must navigate three constrained options: absorb compliance costs while accepting thinner margins and slower growth, relocate to Vienna or Lisbon and forgo existing customer relationships and German market access, or exit the market entirely.
This outcome diverges substantially from MiCA’s regulatory design intent. Experts interviewed for this analysis agreed that rather than creating market unification, the regulation has produced market consolidation favoring large, well-capitalized players. The barrier to entry for smaller competitors is now substantially higher. Some experts characterize this as necessary quality control; others view it as an unintended regulatory burden. The relocation patterns, however, indicate that companies themselves have already decided.
The post Why Smaller Crypto Companies Are Struggling Under MICA appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Hong Kong granted its first two stablecoin issuer licenses to HSBC and Anchorpoint Financial, a Standard Chartered-led consortium that includes Animoca Brands on Friday.
The approvals by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the territory’s central bank, mark the first batch under the Stablecoins Ordinance, which took effect in August 2025.
“We look forward to the issuers launching business according to their plans, exploring growth opportunities while properly managing risks,” HKMA chief executive Eddie Yue said in an announcement on Friday.
“We hope their promotion of regulated stablecoins will address pain points in financial and economic activities, create values for both individuals and businesses, and support the healthy development of digital assets in Hong Kong.”
The HKMA assessed 36 applications and had signaled that the initial round would be limited. Financial Secretary Paul Chan said in his February budget address that only “a small number” would be approved, with the regulator prioritizing risk management, reserve quality, and anti-money-laundering controls.
The decision to license the city’s note-issuing banks first appears to be deliberate. HSBC and Standard Chartered are two of only three commercial banks authorized to print Hong Kong dollar banknotes, a system that dates to 1846, when private banks began issuing currency backed by silver deposits in the absence of a colonial central bank.
Today, each note-issuing bank deposits U.S. dollars with the government’s Exchange Fund at the fixed rate of HK$7.80 per dollar and receives Certificates of Indebtedness in return, against which it prints banknotes.
Yue drew the parallel in a December 2023 blog post.
Pre-1935 banknotes issued by commercial banks in exchange for deposited silver were a form of “private money,” Yue wrote, and stablecoins function as their blockchain-based equivalent — tokens with stable value that can serve as a medium of exchange on-chain.
A strict identity regime
The licenses come with one of the world’s strictest KYC frameworks for digital money.
Under the HKMA’s AML guidelines, licensed stablecoins can only be transferred to wallets whose owners have been identity-verified. The travel rule applies to transfers above HK$8,000 (~$1,000).
In practice, this means HKD stablecoins will likely embed compliance checks into their smart contracts, restricting transfers to wallets listed in an on-chain white list. That makes them structurally different from freely transferable tokens like USDT or USDC.
A HKD CBDC takes a back seat
The bank-led stablecoin model also reflects the HKMA’s decision to deprioritize its central bank digital currency for retail use, as an 11-group pilot program completed in October found the retail case was weak.
CBDCs have historically been a big theme at Hong Kong Fintech Week. Last year, there was barely a mention. Instead, stablecoins were the hot topic.
Standard Chartered CEO Bill Winters said at the time Hong Kong’s push into stablecoins and tokenized deposits could “lay the foundation for a new era of digital trade settlement,” positioning them as a new medium for cross-border commerce.
Whether the market agrees remains to be seen.
Stablecoins are a roughly $310 billion asset class, and USD-denominated tokens dominate nearly all of it.
Data from CoinGecko shows that the largest stablecoins by market cap are dollar-pegged, with no euro-or yen-pegged tokens breaking into the top ranks.
Hong Kong is betting that regulated, bank-issued HKD stablecoins can carve out a role in regional trade settlement, issued by the same institutions, under the same constraints, on new rails.
The question is whether a non-dollar stablecoin, however tightly regulated, can build the network effects needed to compete.
XRP price today sits near $1.34, barely changed over 30 days, down just 2.5%. Yet a shift in who holds XRP (XRP) supply suggests the freeze may not last much longer.
On-chain data reveals the token’s least convinced holders have exited while two whale cohorts added 130 million tokens. With price compressed inside a falling channel, XRP technical analysis points to a convergence that could finally force a direction.
A Falling Channel Keeps Price Frozen Below Key Resistance
XRP price has traded inside a falling channel on the 8-hour chart since its March 17 peak near $1.60. Every attempt to escape since then has failed at the same ceiling.
The most recent rejection came on April 7 and 8. XRP reclaimed the 20-period and 50-period Exponential Moving Averages (EMA), trend indicators that weight recent price moves more heavily. However, the 100-period EMA rejected the advance cleanly.
That level carries weight. Around March 15, XRP reclaimed the 100 EMA and it triggered another 11% rally to the $1.60 high. The same EMA now aligns with the channel’s upper trendline, creating a double XRP resistance wall.
Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.
BeInCrypto recently covered a similar setup in Zcash. The token broke above its own falling channel and surged higher. XRP price prediction models suggest a comparable move is possible if this resistance falls.
Yet an EMA alone does not confirm buyer conviction. The answer lies in who is accumulating and who is walking away.
Weakest Holders Walk Out as XRP Whale Accumulation Builds
Glassnode data shows that speculative money is draining from XRP. The 1-day to 1-week HODL Waves cohort tracks the share of supply held by the newest holders. It peaked at 1.45% on April 4. That reading has since collapsed to 0.684%.
More than half of this short-term supply exited in under a week. In isolation, that looks bearish. Yet these are the holders who typically sell into every bounce and kill rallies before they start. Their exit may actually be clearing the noise.
Meanwhile, XRP whale accumulation has picked up from two separate cohorts. Santiment data shows the 1 billion-plus XRP cohort grew from 25.80 billion to 25.83 billion tokens since April 6. The 10 million to 100 million cohort followed a day later, rising from 11.31 billion to 11.41 billion. Together, both groups added roughly 130 million XRP, and only after the speculative traders started selling.
However, the buying remains gradual. A Glassnode cost basis heatmap reveals roughly 420 million XRP sitting in a supply cluster directly overhead, between $1.37 and $1.38.
If that cluster’s holders begin selling into strength, whale buying alone may not crack through. The price chart reveals exactly where that wall sits.
XRP Price Levels That Decide Whether the Freeze Breaks
The 8-hour Fibonacci chart maps the convergence zone. The immediate levels are $1.35 ($1.349 to be precise) and $1.36. Reclaiming and holding both would be the first sign of life.
However, $1.38 is where the freeze lives or dies. The 100-period EMA, the channel’s upper trendline, and the 420 million XRP supply cluster all converge at that level. A clean close above $1.380 would confirm the XRP breakout. It would clear the channel, the EMA, and the supply wall simultaneously. Targets then open at $1.43, $1.51, and the March 17 high of $1.60.
Yet failure to reclaim $1.35 would keep XRP price frozen inside the channel. In that scenario, $1.32 becomes the next XRP support level at risk. A deeper breakdown exposes $1.28 ($1.279 to be exact), where buyer interest has previously held.
The 30-day freeze has compressed volatility to a breaking point. A close above $1.38 favors the whale thesis and opens a path toward $1.60. A rejection sends XRP back toward $1.28 and turns the freeze into a deeper slide.
The post XRP Price Frozen for a Month? A 130 Million Whale Move May Finally Crack It appeared first on BeInCrypto.
The CIA plans to integrate specialized artificial intelligence into its primary analytics tools to help officers track foreign spies and predict hostile actions from abroad.
Summary
- The CIA plans to embed classified generative AI assistants across its entire analytic infrastructure within two years to help officers identify foreign intelligence trends and draft reports.
- Federal officials are prioritizing these internal AI tools following a government-wide ban on Anthropic technology and an ongoing legal battle over the company’s status as a supply chain risk.
Politico reported that CIA Deputy Director Michael Ellis shared these plans during a Special Competitive Studies Project event in Washington, DC, on Thursday.
He explained that within two years, these “AI co-workers” will be standard across all agency platforms to handle routine tasks.
“Within the next couple of years, we will have AI co-workers built into all of the agency’s analytic platforms — a kind of classified version of generative AI that will help our analysts with basic tasks,” Ellis said.
Security and global competition
These digital assistants are expected to help officers draft judgments and spot patterns in global intelligence, though Ellis clarified that humans will keep control over “key decisions.”
The CIA is forging its own path as the partnership between federal departments and Anthropic hits a breaking point. Following disagreements over the use of the “Claude” AI for surveillance and autonomous weaponry, President Donald Trump ordered federal agencies to stop using the company’s tech in March.
The Department of Defense has since labeled Anthropic a supply chain risk, a move the company is currently challenging in court. While Ellis did not name the firm specifically, he suggested the agency must remain independent of private sector limitations.
“We cannot allow the whims of a single company to constrain our capabilities,” he noted.
The agency is also looking at digital assets as a frontier for national security. Ellis previously mentioned in May that the CIA tracks blockchain data to assist in counterintelligence, viewing cryptocurrency as a vital part of the technological race against China.
The push for better tech is largely driven by a need to maintain an edge over Beijing. Ellis pointed out that the technological lead the U.S. once held has shrunk.
“Five to ten years ago, China was nowhere near America, in terms of technological innovation. That’s just not true today,” he said.
Key Points
-
Over $428M in WLFI collateral deposited on Dolomite sparks concentration worries
-
Platform secures $75M loan using WLFI, moves $40M to Coinbase
-
Token value slides 5.6% in one day, continuing downward trend
-
Experts flag shallow liquidity as potential catalyst for bad debt scenarios
-
Team announces gradual token release plan to maintain market stability
World Liberty Financial has moved to calm market anxiety following heightened attention on its substantial WLFI collateral deployment that prompted liquidation risk discussions throughout decentralized finance communities. The organization defended its lending approach while characterizing concerns as overblown. Yet, declining WLFI valuations and heavy platform concentration maintain pressure on the project.
Massive Collateral Deposit Fuels Borrowing Operations
World Liberty Financial has positioned approximately 5 billion WLFI tokens on Dolomite to serve as loan collateral. Through this mechanism, the organization obtained close to $75 million in stablecoins, primarily USDC and USD1. The magnitude and timing of this operation attracted significant market attention.
Blockchain tracking reveals that more than $40 million subsequently moved to Coinbase Prime from the associated wallet. The transfer happened just before a significant geopolitical development involving U.S. and Iranian relations. This timing sparked speculation regarding strategic motivations and potential vulnerability linked to WLFI holdings.
Platform metrics from Dolomite demonstrate that WLFI currently comprises more than half the protocol’s aggregate supplied capital. The token represents approximately $428.9 million from a total of $825.4 million in deposited assets. Such heavy weighting creates elevated dependency on WLFI performance throughout the lending infrastructure.
Token Valuation Drops as Market Questions Liquidity Depth
WLFI experienced a 5.6% price reduction over a single day as conversations intensified across cryptocurrency channels. The asset has shed 14% of its value during the preceding week under persistent selling activity. This decline heightened apprehension regarding the security of collateralized positions.
Market observers noted that insufficient liquidity depth could obstruct orderly liquidations should WLFI valuations continue declining. Unwinding substantial holdings might prove challenging without incurring significant losses. This dynamic introduces the possibility of uncollectible debt accumulating within Dolomite’s market structure.
Researchers further identified the disconnect between elevated fully diluted valuation and limited actual market depth. Even modest WLFI price deterioration could overwhelm existing liquidation infrastructure. These fundamental vulnerabilities continue fueling the ongoing discourse surrounding WLFI concentration risk.
Platform Leadership Dismisses Concerns and Announces Release Strategy
World Liberty Financial countered liquidation warnings by characterizing them as unfounded speculation and market manipulation. Leadership asserted that adequate collateral margins protect their WLFI borrowing arrangements. The organization further indicated readiness to supplement collateral positions if circumstances warrant.
The initiative also positioned itself as a foundational borrower that enhances yield opportunities for liquidity providers. Leadership therefore presented their activities as advantageous to Dolomite’s overall market health. This stance communicates conviction in WLFI’s sustained importance within the protocol ecosystem.
Simultaneously, World Liberty revealed intentions to introduce a governance proposal addressing token distribution timelines. The forthcoming proposal will establish a staggered release framework instead of immediate full circulation. This methodology seeks to regulate supply dynamics while promoting enduring stability for WLFI markets.
Trading Saham VS Trading Kripto, Mana yang Paling Cuan?
Jennifer Lawrence Embraces Mom Life in NYC While Teasing Major Hollywood Comeback
Behind China’s ‘active efforts’ for an Iran ceasefire: Business trumps politics
-
Fashion7 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Spanx – Corporette.com
-
Business4 days agoThree Gulf funds agree to back Paramount’s $81 billion takeover of Warner, WSJ reports
-
Sports6 days agoIndia men’s 4x400m and mixed 4x100m relay teams register big progress | Other Sports News
-
Business6 days agoExpert Picks for Every Need
-
Tech3 days agoHow Long Can You Drive With Expired Registration? What Florida Law Says
-
Business5 days agoNo Jackpot Winner, Prize to Climb to $231 Million
-
Fashion4 days agoMassimo Dutti Offers Inspiration for Your Summer Mood Board
-
Fashion3 days agoLet’s Discuss: DEI in 2026
-
Politics7 days ago
Wings Over Scotland | The quality of mercy
-
Crypto World2 days agoBitcoin recovers as US and Iran Agree a Ceasefire Deal
-
Business5 days agoAkebia Therapeutics, Inc. (AKBA) Discusses Pipeline Progress and Strategic Focus on Kidney Disease Treatments at R&D Day – Slideshow
-
Crypto World22 hours agoCanary Capital Files SEC Registration for PEPE ETF
-
Fashion7 days agoFrugal Friday’s Workwear Report: Hammered Metallic Button Sweater Vest
-
Politics6 days agoThe UK should not pay a penny in slavery reparations
-
Tech4 days agoSamsung just gave up on its own Messages app
-
Tech4 days agoHaier is betting big that your next TV purchase will be one of these
-
Fashion7 days agoTory Burch’s Spring 2026 Campaign Goes on a Getaway
-
Fashion7 days agoWeekly News Update, 4.3.26 – Corporette.com
-
NewsBeat7 days agoKemi Badenoch talks ‘spring cleaning’ Reform defections
-
Tech4 days agoGamer Restores the Original PlayStation Portal From Two Decades Ago
You must be logged in to post a comment Login