Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Stablecoin news: FinCEN’s new self-policing rule

Published

on

Stablecoin news: FinCEN's new self-policing rule

The stablecoin news out of Washington this week goes beyond reserves and redemptions — FinCEN, the Treasury’s financial crimes unit, has proposed rules that would fundamentally reform how stablecoin issuers and all US financial institutions handle anti-money laundering compliance, shifting from box-checking paperwork toward risk-based self-policing of illicit transactions.

Summary

  • FinCEN published a proposed rule on April 7 that would “fundamentally reform” BSA compliance programs for all financial institutions — including stablecoin issuers, who are classified as financial institutions under the GENIUS Act — requiring them to build risk-based AML frameworks focused on actual illicit finance threats rather than prescriptive documentation
  • Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent framed the proposal explicitly as a reduction in compliance burden: the goal is to redirect resources away from lower-risk activities toward higher-risk ones, with enforcement actions reserved only for “significant or systemic failures”
  • Under the new framework, stablecoin issuers must build programs around four core pillars: internal policies and controls including risk assessments, a designated BSA compliance officer located in the US, employee training tailored to the firm’s risk profile, and independent testing of the program’s effectiveness

The stablecoin news most relevant to compliance teams this week is not from the FDIC or OCC. It comes from FinCEN. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network proposed rules on April 7 that would reshape how all US financial institutions — including stablecoin issuers — manage their anti-money laundering programs. The core shift: from measuring compliance by the volume of filings and paperwork to measuring it by demonstrated effectiveness at identifying and stopping illicit finance.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the intent directly: “Our proposal restores common sense with a focus on keeping bad actors out of the financial system, not burying America’s banks in more red tape.” FDIC Chair Travis Hill, whose agency is a co-proposing regulator, called it “perhaps the most important of the reforms Congress envisioned in the AML Act.”

Advertisement

The GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025, classified all permitted payment stablecoin issuers as “financial institutions” under the Bank Secrecy Act. That classification means the FinCEN proposal applies to them with the same force it applies to banks. Stablecoin firms that previously operated under lighter compliance regimes — relying on state money transmitter licenses and minimal internal monitoring — must now build programs that meet bank-level AML standards.

This is not a future requirement. The GENIUS Act’s implementing regulations must be finalized by July 18, 2026. Any stablecoin issuer operating after that date without a compliant program faces potential enforcement actions covering civil penalties, criminal prosecution, and license revocation.

The Four Pillars FinCEN Now Requires

Under the proposed framework, every covered financial institution — including stablecoin issuers — must build their AML program around four core components. First: internal policies, procedures, and controls, including a documented risk assessment process that identifies the specific illicit finance threats the issuer faces based on its customers, products, and geography. Second: a BSA compliance officer physically located in the United States with supervisory authority over the program. Third: ongoing employee training tailored to the institution’s actual risk profile. Fourth: independent testing by an outside party that evaluates whether the program has been effectively implemented — with explicit language prohibiting auditors from substituting their own judgment for the institution’s risk-based determinations.

Advertisement

The proposal also limits when enforcement is appropriate. FinCEN stated it would generally not initiate significant supervisory action unless an institution had “a significant or systemic failure” to maintain its program — a standard intended to protect well-run programs from technical violations that pose no real illicit finance risk.

As crypto.news reported, the FDIC simultaneously proposed its own 191-page stablecoin rule covering reserves and redemption standards. As crypto.news noted, the GENIUS Act’s enforcement framework spans the Treasury, Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC — with FinCEN and OFAC playing central roles in sanctions and AML oversight. The FinCEN proposal fills the compliance design gap the statute left open.

Comments on the proposed rule are due 60 days after Federal Register publication, before the July 18 regulatory deadline.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

TON Blockchain is Now 10x Faster: Pavel Durov Explains the Upgrade

Published

on

TON Blockchain is Now 10x Faster: Pavel Durov Explains the Upgrade

Pavel Durov announced that the TON blockchain is now 10x faster. The Telegram founder shared the news on April 9, explaining that transactions now confirm in under one second. Before the upgrade, users waited over five seconds for finality.

“The TON blockchain just got upgraded and is now 10× faster,” Durov wrote. “Transactions are now instant, subsecond.”

How the Upgrade Works

The speed improvement comes from Catchain 2.0, a new consensus mechanism running under the hood. Blocks now generate every 400 milliseconds, which is 6x faster than before. A new streaming layer pushes updates to apps almost instantly rather than making them wait for the next block.

For everyday users, this means payments go through in about one second. Trades execute in real time. Apps respond immediately. The delays that made blockchain interactions feel slow compared to regular apps are largely gone.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Advertisement

Step One of Make TON Great Again

Durov framed the upgrade as the first step in a seven-part plan he calls “Make TON Great Again,” or MTONGA. The name echoes a certain political slogan, but the goals are technical: making TON fast enough and cheap enough to compete with centralized platforms.

The next step on the roadmap: cutting transaction fees by 6x. TON fees are already low compared to Ethereum or Solana, but further reductions would make micropayments and high-frequency applications more practical.

Durov designed TON to work inside Telegram, which has over one billion users. His vision includes payments that feel like sending a message, Mini Apps that respond instantly, and DeFi tools that rival the speed of centralized exchanges.

Advertisement

At five-second confirmation times, delivering that experience was difficult. At sub-second finality, it becomes possible. The infrastructure now matches what users expect from any other app on their phone.

What Comes Next for TON

The upgrade went live on mainnet on April 10, 2026. Durov confirmed the fee reduction as step two but has not yet shared the timeline for the remaining six steps in the MTONGA roadmap.

For developers building on TON, the recommendation is to update their apps to use streaming APIs rather than polling. In other words, the blockchain is faster. Apps need to catch up.

The post TON Blockchain is Now 10x Faster: Pavel Durov Explains the Upgrade appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

The magic word for digital assets adoption and success: choice

Published

on

The magic word for digital assets adoption and success: choice

Digital assets have moved well beyond the hype cycle. What began as an experiment in decentralized value transfer has evolved into a serious conversation about how capital markets, custody, settlement and asset ownership could be re-imagined for the digital age. Tokenization, programmable money and distributed ledgers may deliver faster settlement, greater transparency and new efficiencies across the financial system.

The opportunity is both real and transformative, but accelerated adoption of digital assets is not guaranteed.

The ecosystem’s success will not be determined by any single technology, protocol, innovator or platform. Instead, it will hinge on whether the industry embraces a principle that traditional markets have relied on and come to expect for more than a century: choice.

If investors, issuers and intermediaries are forced into narrow paths and left without options, the promise of digital assets risks being constrained by the very silos they were meant to dismantle. For Web3 to flourish, market participants must be able to choose how, where and when they engage.

Advertisement

Choice in blockchain networks: avoiding silos

One of the most pressing challenges facing digital assets adoption today is fragmentation. New blockchains and networks continue to emerge, each optimized for different use cases, governance models or performance requirements. While innovation is healthy, disconnected ecosystems can quickly become a barrier to scale.

Without interoperability, assets risk being locked into isolated environments, limiting liquidity, mobility and investor access. The result is a digital version of the same inefficiencies that have historically plagued financial markets, with the added benefits of being faster and more complex.

Interoperability has the potential to change that result. A “network of networks” approach enables assets to move securely across platforms, enabling market participant firms and investors to take full advantage of tokenization’s potential while preserving market integrity and scale. It simplifies use cases, unlocks new business models and supports regulatory consistency, without forcing the industry to converge on a single chain.

Indeed, some investors may prefer open, public blockchains, while others may gravitate toward private blockchains. It’s not a matter of ‘or’ – both can and should be available.

Advertisement

Achieving this vision will require collaboration. Market infrastructure providers, technology firms and regulators must work together to establish frameworks that prioritize compatibility and interoperability over control. In a recent white paper authored by The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) in collaboration with Clearstream, Euroclear and BCG, we explored how shared standards and coordinated governance could help advance interoperability while maintaining trust and resilience. The message was and remains clear: interoperability is foundational to scale and the future growth of digital markets.

Choice in what assets to tokenize (and when!)

Tokenization is often discussed as an inevitability, but inevitability should not be confused with immediacy. Not every asset will tokenize, and those that do will not do so at the same pace.

For example, while The Depository Trust Corporation (DTC), as a securities depository, facilitates the post‑trade settlement of securities representing over $100 trillion in value, we are not advocating for broad, indiscriminate, or immediate tokenization. Particularly in the early stages of this ecosystem, disciplined sequencing, intentionality, and caution are essential.

Certain asset classes, especially those with clear operational inefficiencies, high reconciliation costs or settlement frictions, are natural early candidates for tokenization. Others may follow as technology matures, regulatory clarity increases, and market demand evolves. Giving issuers and investors the ability to decide what makes sense for their needs, and on their timeline, reduces risk and builds confidence.

Advertisement

Choice, in this context, is about sequencing and needs. It allows the market to learn, adapt and scale responsibly rather than forcing adoption before the infrastructure is ready.

Choice in how investors want to hold real-world assets

Digital transformation does not mean abandoning established investing principles and processes.

For many institutional investors, tokenized assets will coexist with traditional holdings for many years to come. Some will prefer onchain representations for their operational efficiency or programmability. Others will continue to rely on established custody models, particularly as compliance and risk frameworks evolve.

A successful digital asset ecosystem can support both. Investors should be able to hold assets in tokenized form alongside traditional securities – and even switch back and forth between them – without sacrificing legal certainty, operational continuity or even the feeling of being in control. Flexibility ensures participation is driven by value, not obligation, and that trust is earned, not assumed.

Advertisement

Choice in wallets: empowering the client

Perhaps the most tangible expression of choice is the wallet.

As digital assets enter mainstream financial markets, participants will bring different preferences, risk tolerances and operational requirements. Some will prioritize self-custody. Others will rely on institutional-grade solutions. Many will want the freedom to change over time.

Wallet selection should belong to clients (market participant firms). No prescribed wallet. No mandated standard. This model empowers market participants to choose based on their own security needs, regulatory considerations, geographic requirements or internal controls.

This flexibility is essential for adoption at scale. Markets will thrive when financial institutions have the opportunity to engage on their own terms and can make decisions based on their clients’ and investors’ strategies, needs and preferences.

Advertisement

The path forward

The success of the digital assets ecosystem will not be built on constraints and limitations. Instead, it will be built on options: choice in blockchain, in assets, in custody and in wallets. These are practical requirements for facilitating growth.

If the industry gets this right, digital assets can deliver on their promise: more inclusive, efficient and resilient markets. If it gets it wrong, it risks recreating the limitations of the past on faster rails.

Choice is the key to making digital assets work for everyone.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

White House Warns Staff as Iran Bets Spark Insider Concerns

Published

on

White House Warns Staff as Iran Bets Spark Insider Concerns

The White House warned staff against improperly using confidential information to place bets in futures markets after suspicious oil trades ahead of President Donald Trump’s March 23 Iran announcement drew scrutiny, according to Reuters.

Reuters reported on Thursday that the White House sent the internal email on March 24, a day after Trump ordered a five-day delay in attacks on Iran’s energy infrastructure.

The warning followed a roughly $500 million bet on Brent and West Texas Intermediate crude futures placed in a one-minute burst shortly before Trump’s March 23 announcement, according to Reuters calculations based on exchange data. Oil prices fell about 15% after the policy shift.

The episode has intensified scrutiny of whether officials or politically connected traders could profit from nonpublic information tied to military or policy decisions. It has also added momentum to a broader push in Washington to tighten rules around prediction-market trading.

Advertisement

The STOCK Act amendment in the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) prohibits federal officials, congress members, executive staff and judicial officers from using non-public information derived from their positions to trade commodity, futures or options markets. The amendment was signed into law on April 4, 2012.

Cointelegraph has approached the White House for a copy of the internal email.

Related: US Senate bill targets prediction markets on war and assassinations

Lawmakers respond to prediction market insider trading concerns

Lawmakers have also stepped up scrutiny of prediction markets, where well-timed bets tied to military and political events have raised similar concerns about the misuse of privileged information. Polymarket traders netted around $1 million by accurately betting when the US would strike Iran.

Advertisement

In response to the concerns, Congressman Adrian Smith and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski introduced the Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act) on March 25, a bipartisan bill seeking to ban members of Congress and federal officials from prediction market trading.

On March 26, US lawmakers Todd Young, Elissa Slotkin, John Curtis and Adam Schiff unveiled the bipartisan Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026, a bill aimed at curbing prediction market insider trading by government officials.

End Prediction Market Corruption Act. Source: Merkley.senate.gov

The same day, Senator Jeff Merkley introduced the End Prediction Market Corruption Act, seeking to ban event contract trading by government officials with “material non-public information,” including the president, vice president and members of Congress.

Magazine: Crypto traders ‘fool themselves’ with price predictions — Peter Brandt