Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Circle Explains Why It Didn’t Freeze Stolen USDC in the $275 Million Drift Hack

Published

on

Clarity Act Fails March 1 Deadline as Stablecoin Yield Dispute Stalls Progress

Circle’s Chief Strategy Officer Dante Disparte published a direct defense of the company’s authority to freeze USDC (USDC), naming the $270 million Drift Protocol exploit as the catalyst.

The blog post and a separate X statement followed weeks of criticism from onchain investigator ZachXBT, who accused Circle of inaction while stolen funds moved through its Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol.

Circle Responds to Freeze Criticism

Circle framed its freeze capability as a compliance obligation rather than a discretionary tool. He wrote that USDC freezes happen only when the law compels action through a formal process.

When Circle freezes USDC, it is not because we have decided, unilaterally or arbitrarily, that someone’s assets should be taken from them. It is because the law requires us to act,” wrote Disparte in a blog.

The statement appeared to address ZachXBT’s earlier accusation that Circle failed to freeze stolen USDC during the April 1 exploit.

Advertisement

The investigator had noted that hundreds of millions in USDC moved from Solana (SOL) to Ethereum (ETH) via CCTP during U.S. business hours without intervention.

Disparte also acknowledged a tension familiar to the crypto industry. He argued that the same framework protecting holders from arbitrary interference also limits how fast an issuer can act during an active exploit.

Beyond defending existing policies, Disparte called for new legal structures that would allow issuers and exchanges to respond more quickly to theft without creating overreach risks.

He said the tools to intervene exist, but the legal authorization for rapid, coordinated action does not.

He pointed to the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act as vehicles for codifying those standards. The U.S. Treasury Department is already advancing rulemaking to implement the GENIUS Act, with the FDIC approving a proposed rule on April 7.

In a parallel move, Disparte published an op-ed urging the UK to claim a second-mover advantage in stablecoin regulation.

Advertisement

He argued that combining elements of Europe’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) with the GENIUS Act framework could position London as a competitive hub.

The contrast between aggressive civil enforcement and perceived inaction in the face of a confirmed exploit remains a focal point for critics questioning how regulated issuers exercise their freeze authority.

The post Circle Explains Why It Didn’t Freeze Stolen USDC in the $275 Million Drift Hack appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Bitcoin Mining Centralizes as AI Decentralizes: Galaxy Research

Published

on

Bitcoin Mining Centralizes as AI Decentralizes: Galaxy Research

Bitcoin mining runs the risk of becoming more centralized as time goes on, while artificial intelligence could be moving in the opposite direction, according to Galaxy Research head Alex Thorn.

Thorn said that while Bitcoin mining began decentralized, with users mining Bitcoin on their personal computers, it has since become far more centralized, requiring ASIC miners or industrial-scale farms. 

“AI may follow the opposite path,” Thorn said, explaining that AI began in centralized clusters but could decentralize as open-source models close the gap.

“If local models keep getting smaller, cheaper, and more efficient, AI may become increasingly personal and on-device.”

The divergence strikes at the heart of crypto’s core promise: decentralization. If Bitcoin mining were to continue down a path of centralization, it could begin to raise concerns about the network’s long-term resilience.

Advertisement
AI may move opposite to BTC mining and become more decentralized over time. Source: Alex Thorn

Edge AI market to grow 300% in the next eight years

Edge AI computing refers to the deployment and running of AI models directly on local devices or “at the edge” of the network, rather than sending all data to centralized cloud servers or massive data centers for processing.

The global AI edge market is anticipated to grow from about $25 billion in 2025 to a projected $119 billion by 2033, according to Grand View Research.

Related: Researchers discover malicious AI agent routers that can steal crypto

The edge market is experiencing significant growth driven by the “rapid expansion of IoT (Internet of Things) and connected devices,” stated GVR. 

This increases the demand for real-time and low-latency data processing, growing the adoption of AI-enabled automation across industries, and “rising focus on data privacy and localized intelligence at the network edge,” GVR added.

Advertisement
Edge AI market is predicted to surge by 300% by 2033. Source:  Grand View Research

Bitcoin mining is decentralizing geographically 

Crypto exchange KuCoin reported on Friday that Bitcoin mining has become increasingly unviable in the United States as the cost to mine a single BTC has surpassed $100,000 in some regions due to surging energy costs

This is resulting in a geographic migration with hash rate actively moving toward the “Global South,” with Paraguay and Ethiopia emerging as the leading destinations due to surplus hydroelectric power.

This could help to decentralize mining, at least from a geographical perspective.

“This decentralization of mining power across different continents enhances the security of the network by making it less vulnerable to any single country’s political or environmental shocks,” it stated.

Magazine: Bitcoin quantum-safe without upgrade? CZ’s 2031 crypto vision: Hodler’s Digest

Advertisement