Whale activity around the TRUMP memecoin has intensified in the lead-up to a high-profile luncheon for top holders at Mar-a-Lago, even as the token’s price retraces from a March spike. On-chain data tracked by analytics firms shows several large transfers and new stash increases among the largest wallets, underscoring the ongoing tension between demand from retail participants and the concentration of supply among a handful of holders.

blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain highlighted the latest moves, including a whale who withdrew 105,754 OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) from Binance to augment a stash of about 1.13 million TRUMP — roughly $3.2 million at current prices — reported on Sunday. Earlier in the week, another large holder pulled 850,488 TRUMP from Bybit. On Solscan, a different wallet increased its TRUMP balance to more than 368,000 after an exit from BitMart, while a fourth wallet boosted holdings to above one million TRUMP following a Bybit withdrawal. These movements come as the top holders are slated for a private luncheon at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate on April 25, with the event billed as featuring the former president as keynote speaker and a private reception for the top 29 holders.

Critics have argued that the event blurs political power with fundraising and personal gain, a concern echoed by lawmakers who have proposed measures aimed at curbing profits from memecoins tied to political figures. The White House has not commented on the memecoin’s fundraising optics, but the policy debate around memecoins remains a constant background theme in coverage of this asset class.

TRUMP price drift and what it implies for holders

The token’s price has cooled considerably since its March surge tied to the luncheon announcement. TRUMP traded near $2.80 on Monday, down more than 33% from its March peak of about $4.35. Data from CoinGecko shows the retracement, even as on-chain activity suggests ongoing accumulation among the largest holders.

Analyst commentary from Dominick John at Zeus Research framed the move this way: the price decline appears driven by retail selling against a backdrop of thin liquidity, which makes it easier for modest selling pressure to push prices lower. He also noted that the insider supply overhang means even small distributions from concentrated wallets can absorb new bids, dampening upside momentum for the token.

CoinCarp’s data reinforces the sense of pronounced concentration: the platform lists 642,882 TRUMP holders, with more than 91% of the supply held by the top 10 wallets and over 97% held by the top 100 wallets. In other words, the distribution of supply remains highly centralized, a factor that can both stabilize and cap upside depending on how those wallets choose to act in any given moment.

Past milestones, present dynamics, and potential catalysts

Trump’s first “crypto gala” dinner in May 2025 marked a previous burst in TRUMP’s price, with the token peaking around $15.59 roughly a month before the event and then retreating in the run-up. In the months since, the price path has been markedly less pronounced, though traders and analysts have pointed to potential catalysts that could rekindle momentum. John at Zeus Research suggests that a broader market backdrop paired with event-driven announcements could help establish a usable floor for the token and stir reflexive upside among participants.

“One catalyst to watch is the potential for event-driven launches, such as a proposed Trump Billionaire Game, which could generate social buzz and translate into short-term upside momentum,” John said. He cautioned that the same concentration of supply could moderate gains if the large holders decide to distribute, even in the face of favorable headlines.

Looking ahead, the upcoming luncheon and any related corporate or political announcements could act as a sentiment lever for the TRUMP token. If institutional interest begins to show in early accumulation or if broader memecoin activity heats up around the same time, a floor could form, enabling a more resilient bounce. But observers caution that absent a broader rebalancing of the supply base, gains may remain predominantly tied to the whims of the top holders rather than a healthy, broad-based retail demand story.

From a market structure perspective, the potential for new, high-profile launches tied to Trump’s brand in the crypto space could add a novel driver for short-term upside. Still, investors should contend with a highly concentrated holder base and liquidity that can tighten quickly during pullbacks, a dynamic that has underscored past price fluctuations.

Beyond price, regulatory scrutiny continues to loom. Democratic lawmakers have signaled an intent to curb profits from memecoins associated with political figures, a thread that could influence both participation and sentiment in the space over the medium term. As policymakers weigh proposals, traders and builders will be watching for any clarity on how such tokens should be treated under securities or commodity frameworks and whether targeted restrictions could alter the economics of large-scale memecoin holdings.

The TRUMP token’s appeal appears to rest as much on social momentum and media visibility as on fundamentals. The luncheon at Mar-a-Lago, the album of on-chain movements by large wallets, and the narrative around political branding in crypto all contribute to a multifaceted story that transcends a single price point. For readers, the key takeaway is to watch how the top holders’ decisions, new event-driven catalysts, and regulatory signals intersect to shape the token’s trajectory in the near term.

In practice, the evolving mix of on-chain activity and market sentiment suggests that the next few weeks could be telling for TRUMP. If the pool of actively trading retail investors expands or if a credible new catalyst surfaces, the token could test a new range. If, however, the concentration among the top wallets remains a dominant feature, upside may be limited unless a decisive large-holder move triggers broader participation.

As always, readers should stay tuned to on-chain trackers and exchange flow summaries for the latest movements, while watching for any official commentary on the event’s political optics and potential regulatory implications that could influence investor appetite for memecoins tied to public figures.

XRP price has remained in a consolidation phase for the past two weeks as investors remain in a risk-off mood, weighed by the uncertainty of when ongoing geopolitical tensions ease.

According to data from crypto.news, XRP (XRP) price has been trading within the $1.25 to $1.40 range for more than two weeks. Trading at $1.33 at press time, the 4th largest crypto asset by market cap has fallen nearly 16% from its March high.

XRP price crashed shortly after the U.S. SEC and CFTC jointly classified XRP as a digital commodity on March 17, ending years of legal uncertainty from the SEC lawsuit and shifting primary oversight to the CFTC.

Despite the bullish news, once it surfaced, many investors sold the news to lock in profits, which created very strong selling pressure on the XRP token.

Third-party data shows whales have been systematically selling their holdings since October last year. These whales have dumped an estimated $6 billion worth of XRP since then, as they used every price bounce as an opportunity to exit their positions.

The token’s price has also been suppressed by the tension in the Middle East, which has lowered investor risk appetite and impacted the broader crypto market.

It continues to remain at risk of more downside as investors continue to move their XRP holdings to exchanges. Data from CoinGlass shows that nearly $160 million worth of XRP has been moved to exchanges over the past two days. If these investors were to sell their coins, it could trigger a deeper correction.

This comes as the open interest in the XRP futures market has been stalling around $2 to $3 billion for more than a month now, significantly lower than the $9 billion level recorded in October last year, a sign that derivatives traders have lost interest in the token.

The daily XRP chart suggests that the token could be set for more downside in the short term. Notably, the 20-day SMA has formed a bearish crossover with the 50-day SMA, a sign that momentum is turning bearish.

XRP price has also slipped below the last line of defense at $1.43, which represents the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement level drawn from the Jan. 6 high to the Feb. 5 low.

Adding to this, the supertrend indicator has flipped red, and the RSI has dropped below the neutral threshold. Hence, XRP price stands at risk of dropping to the Feb. 5 low of $1.12, with the breach of this support potentially further accelerating the slide towards the $1.00 psychological level.

Despite the bearish outlook presented by the XRP chart in the short term, some analysts maintain a bullish perspective over a longer time frame.

In a recent X post by analyst Ali Martinez, he expects the XRP token to rebound by over 500% over the coming months if it successfully breaks out of a descending triangle pattern that has been developing on the monthly timeframe for nearly nine years. See below:

Crypto hacks are nothing new, but cases where attackers take big risks and walk away with peanuts aren’t common. That rare scenario played out on Sunday.

An attacker exploited a vulnerability in Hyperbridge’s cross-chain gateway that connects different blockchains, minting 1 billion Polkadot tokens ($1.19 billion) on Ethereum and dumping them for approximately $237,000 worth of ether.

The exploit adds to a growing list of bridge vulnerabilities in 2026. Last month saw a $270 million Drift Protocol drain on Solana, while a social engineering attack, rather than a code exploit, similarly involved compromised infrastructure.

The Sunday exploit targeted the bridge contract, not Polkadot’s core network. Polkadot’s native token DOT was unaffected. The vulnerability sat in how Hyperbridge’s EthereumHost contract validates incoming cross-chain messages before passing them to the TokenGateway.

Bridges, which help move coins from one blockchain to another, remain the weakest link in cross-chain architecture because they hold admin-level control over token contracts on destination chains, meaning a single validation failure can grant an attacker the ability to mint unlimited supply.

Here’s how attack unfolded

On-chain traces show that the attacker submitted a forged message via dispatchIncoming, which was routed to TokenGateway.onAccept.

The request receipts check, which should have verified the message against a valid cross-chain state commitment from Polkadot, stored an all-zeros commitment value, suggesting the proof validation was either absent or circumventable for this specific call path. The gateway processed the message as legitimate.

The accepted message executed changeAdmin on the bridged Polkadot token contract, transferring admin rights to the attacker’s address. With admin control, the attacker minted 1 billion tokens in a single transaction and routed them through Odos Router V3 into a Uniswap V4 DOT-ETH pool, extracting roughly 108.2 ETH across what appears to be multiple swaps at slightly different prices.

Liquidity worked against the attacker

Weak liquidity/depth, or the market’s ability to absorb large orders at stable prices, is usually a major issue for whales. But, in this case, it worked against the attacker, capping its profit.

The bridged DOT pool on Ethereum held limited depth, meaning 1 billion tokens overwhelmed the available liquidity and the attacker received a fraction of a cent per token.

On a deeper pool or a higher-value bridged asset, the same vulnerability would have produced significantly larger losses. DOT trades just under $1.20 as of Asian morning hours on Monday.

CertiK flagged the exploit, confirming the attack vector was the Hyperbridge gateway contract and that the attacker profited approximately $237,000 from minting and selling the bridged tokens.

Hyperbridge has not publicly commented on the exploit or disclosed whether other bridged token contracts using the same gateway are vulnerable to the same forged-message attack vector.

For decades, the internet has been a giant messaging system. Data moves. Requests route. Packets find their way across invisible rails.

Now something strange is happening: money is starting to behave the same way.

Not metaphorically. Literally structurally.

We’re watching decentralized finance evolve into a parallel internet layer—one that doesn’t just use the web, but mirrors its architecture.

And once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

The Internet Was Built for Data. DeFi Is Rebuilding It for Value.

Traditional finance looks nothing like the internet.

It’s slow. Centralized. Permissioned. Every transfer is a bureaucratic event dressed up as a transaction.

But DeFi flips the model.

On networks like Ethereum, value becomes natively digital, programmable, and composable. It doesn’t “move” through institutions—it routes through protocols.

That’s the key shift:

The internet moved information. DeFi moves capital.

And once capital becomes “packetized,” everything changes.

Financial Routing Protocols Are Replacing Banks

In the traditional web, routers decide how packets travel.

In DeFi, protocols decide how money flows.

Decentralized exchanges like Uniswap act like liquidity routers. Lending markets behave like bandwidth allocation systems. Yield strategies resemble automated traffic optimization.

There’s no single bank deciding your path.

Instead, there’s a constantly updating network of smart contracts negotiating where your capital goes next.

It’s not finance anymore.

It’s routing logic.

Capital Becomes Packets

This is the mental model shift most people miss.

In Web2:

• Data = packets
• Infrastructure = servers + routers
• Optimization = latency, bandwidth

In DeFi:

• Capital = packets
• Infrastructure = liquidity pools + chains
• Optimization = yield, risk, execution speed

Your money stops being static.

It starts behaving like a traveling signal—split, recombined, rerouted, and optimized in real time.

Even concepts like “portfolio” start to feel outdated. You don’t hold assets—you route exposure.

Wallets Are No Longer Accounts. They’re Nodes.

A wallet used to mean: your account at a bank.

In DeFi, a wallet is something else entirely.

It is a node.

On ecosystems like Solana or Ethereum, a wallet doesn’t just store value—it participates in a live financial mesh:

• signing transactions
• interacting with protocols
• staking capital into networks
• bridging across chains
• voting in governance systems

Each wallet becomes a small financial server in a global, permissionless machine.

The implication is uncomfortable:

You are no longer a customer. You are infrastructure.

DeFi as a Network Layer, Not an App Layer

Most people still think DeFi is “apps on the internet.”

That’s outdated.

The better analogy is the OSI layers:

• Internet = data transport layer
• Web2 = application layer
• DeFi = value transport layer

It sits underneath applications, quietly handling how value moves between systems.

You don’t “use DeFi” in the same way you don’t “use TCP/IP.”

You build on it. You route through it. You depend on it without thinking about it.

That’s what a real infrastructure layer looks like.

The Rise of Autonomous Financial Traffic

Once value becomes programmable and composable, something weird emerges:

Self-optimizing money flow.

Strategies already exist that:

• Rebalance across yield markets automatically
• Bridge assets based on gas costs
• Route swaps through optimal liquidity paths
• Stack protocols like financial Lego

The system starts behaving less like a market and more like an adaptive network.

And unlike traditional finance, there’s no central optimizer.

The network optimizes itself.

Sometimes efficiently. Sometimes chaotically. Always irreversibly.

The Uncomfortable Truth

If this trajectory continues, DeFi won’t just disrupt finance.

It will redefine what “financial systems” even mean.

Banks won’t disappear overnight. But they may slowly become irrelevant at the protocol level—like fax machines in an API world.

And the real shift isn’t technological.

It’s conceptual:

Money is becoming native internet traffic.

Not stored. Not processed manually. Not moved through institutions.

Routed.

Closing Thought

We spent 30 years building the internet for information.

Now we’re rebuilding it for value.

And once capital flows like data, the boundary between “internet” and “financial system” stops making sense.

At that point, there is no web and no banking system.

There’s just a single, unified network.

And DeFi is already wiring it together.

REQUEST AN ARTICLE

Key Highlights

• SOL currently consolidates around $80 facing resistance near $87
• Technical indicators suggest potential move to $88–$90 using Fibonacci analysis
• Weekly timeframe maintains bullish scenario targeting $1,000
• Solana ETFs experienced withdrawals exceeding $17 million during the past week
• Derivatives market shows open interest dropping to $4.72 billion amid declining participation

Solana maintains its position near the $80 threshold at the start of this week after experiencing a 4% decline on Sunday. This downward movement occurred in tandem with a widespread correction across cryptocurrency markets. Trading has remained confined within a defined range, as bullish momentum faces challenges breaking through critical overhead resistance.

The 50-day exponential moving average currently positions itself at $87.43, coinciding with a falling trendline. This technical level has consistently rejected bullish attempts. Additional resistance emerges from the 100-day EMA at $99.19 and the 200-day EMA at $118.32, creating multiple layers of overhead barriers.

Analyzing shorter timeframes, technical analyst MCO Global identifies a systematic progression toward a Fibonacci-derived target zone spanning $88.13 to $90.01. Multiple wave projections converge on this identical range, establishing it as the next logical upside destination should the current recovery pattern persist.

Downside protection exists between $71.92 and $77.92. The critical support floor rests at $77.60, corresponding to the February 5 low. Failure to maintain this level could trigger further weakness toward $67.50.

Institutional Withdrawals Weigh on Sentiment

Solana ETF products witnessed withdrawals surpassing $17 million throughout the week. A substantial redemption early in the period accounted for the majority of this total. Friday brought $11.45 million in fresh capital, reducing the weekly net outflow to $5.62 million.

This represents the third consecutive week of negative net flows for Solana exchange-traded funds. The pattern suggests diminishing institutional demand for SOL exposure at present valuation levels.

Derivatives metrics show open interest contracting to $4.72 billion on Monday from $4.88 billion previously. Funding rates maintain a marginally positive reading, indicating long positions continue to slightly outnumber short positions.

The Relative Strength Index registers below the neutral 50 level, signaling subdued buying pressure. While the MACD indicator trades beneath zero, preliminary signs suggest the bearish momentum may be losing intensity. However, no definitive reversal pattern has materialized.

Weekly Chart Preserves Higher Targets

Technical analyst James Easton highlights the weekly timeframe, suggesting the fundamental structure remains uncompromised. According to his assessment, Solana continues trading within an established ascending channel without violating the broader pattern.

He identifies an ambitious long-term bullish objective at $1,000, contingent upon SOL avoiding significant structural breakdown and ultimately recapturing positive momentum. Through this lens, the current price weakness appears consistent with consolidation rather than trend failure.

The weekly MACD continues displaying muted characteristics without evidence of upward momentum revival. This suggests the extended timeframe bullish scenario remains theoretically viable but requires continued patience from market participants.

Solana’s latest trading data confirms price stability just above $80, with market participants focusing attention on the $87–$90 resistance zone.

Key Takeaways

• The Aave community greenlit a $25M stablecoin funding package for Aave Labs with approximately 75% voting approval
• An additional 75,000 AAVE tokens (valued at roughly $6.8M) were approved with a 48-month vesting schedule
• This decision implements the “Aave Will Win” strategy, transitioning Aave Labs to DAO-supported funding
• Under the revised arrangement, all product revenue generated by Aave will be directed to the DAO treasury
• The Aave Chan Initiative represented the strongest opposition, voting against with 166,200 AAVE

The Aave decentralized autonomous organization concluded a governance vote on Sunday, greenlighting a $25 million stablecoin funding package for Aave Labs alongside an allocation of 75,000 AAVE tokens valued at approximately $6.8 million. Final results showed 522,780 AAVE supporting the measure versus 175,310 opposing it, equating to roughly three-quarters approval.

This governance action, titled the “Aave Will Win Framework: Primary Funding Request,” represents the initial executable component of an expanded strategic vision presented by Aave’s creator, Stani Kulechov.

The approved stablecoin distribution follows a tiered structure. Aave Labs will immediately access a 5 million aEthLidoGHO allocation, followed by a 5 million distribution streamed across six months, and an additional 15 million streamed throughout 12 months. The accompanying 75,000 AAVE tokens will unlock progressively over four years from the DAO’s Ecosystem Reserve holdings.

The Aave Chan Initiative, established by Marc Zeller, registered the most significant opposition vote at 166,200 AAVE. This organization had previously disclosed plans to withdraw from its DAO responsibilities by July due to governance quality concerns.

Leading supporters included a wallet associated with ParaFi Capital contributing 190,000 AAVE, delegate “luggis.eth” with 123,580 AAVE, and governance organization Areta committing 75,775 AAVE.

Operational Shifts Under the Approved Framework

The approved structure redirects all revenue streams from Aave’s product ecosystem — encompassing aave.com swap services, Aave Pro, Aave App, and Aave Kit — directly into the DAO treasury. This revenue flow compensates for the DAO’s direct operational funding of Aave Labs.

Moving forward, Aave Labs will concentrate exclusively on Aave-specific product development. The framework additionally confirms Aave V4 as the protocol’s permanent technical foundation. Aave V4 went live on Ethereum mainnet during late March.

In an X platform statement, Kulechov characterized this vote as “the most important proposal in Aave’s history.” He detailed forthcoming initiatives including consumer-facing products, fintech partnership integrations, and pursuing regulatory authorization worldwide to facilitate fiat currency onboarding.

Recent Challenges Within Aave’s Contributor Ecosystem

This governance decision follows a challenging phase for Aave’s contributor community. BGD Labs, a significant technical contributor, terminated its involvement on April 1, citing concerns over centralization trends.

Risk assessment partner Chaos Labs similarly announced its departure last week. Co-founder Omer Goldberg explained that their allocated $3 million budget for 2025 fell substantially below the projected $8 million requirement to effectively support both V3 and V4 protocol versions.

The preliminary temperature check for this framework conducted in early March barely achieved majority support at 52.58%. Detractors suggested that wallets connected to Aave Labs had swayed that preliminary outcome.

Sunday’s binding governance vote demonstrated substantially stronger backing at 75%, reflecting considerable improvement from the initial assessment.

Supplementary funding allocations for growth initiatives and development tied to specific product rollouts — such as the Aave App, Aave Card, and Aave Kit — will proceed through independent governance proposals.

Aave maintains its position as the dominant decentralized lending platform measured by deposit volume. Its total value locked surpasses $25 billion, based on DeFiLlama analytics. AAVE’s token price declined nearly 5% during the 24-hour period surrounding the vote but experienced a modest recovery following passage.

Funding implementation was scheduled for Monday afternoon, initiating the transfer stream to an Aave Labs-managed wallet address.

How farming turned into a parallel economy—and why it’s starting to crack

There was a time when airdrops were simple: use a protocol early, get rewarded later. A nice little “thank you” for taking a risk when nobody cared.

Now? It’s a full-blown industrial complex.

Not an incentive anymore—an entire economy optimized around extracting incentives.

And honestly, it’s starting to look like DeFi accidentally invented its own version of late-stage capitalism… complete with weird productivity theater.

1. From “users” to “farm units.”

At some point, users stopped behaving like users.

They became:

• Wallet clusters
• Activity generators
• Sybil-resistant puzzle solvers
• “Engagement farmers” running 37 tabs like it’s a second job

Instead of asking “Does this protocol help me?”
The question quietly shifted to:

“What do I need to do to look valuable enough to qualify for a drop?”

That’s a big psychological flip.

Because now usage isn’t about need—it’s about performance.

Protocols didn’t just gain users. They gained actors in an incentive play.

2. The rise of “airdrop choreography.”

If you’ve been around, you’ve seen it:

• Bridge funds in
• Swap a few tokens
• Provide liquidity for exactly long enough to register
• Mint random NFTs “just in case.”
• Interact once per week, like a calendar reminder, with financial consequences.

This isn’t DeFi usage.

It’s an airdrop choreography.

Every move is calculated around invisible scoring systems:

• volume thresholds
• wallet age
• interaction frequency
• “organic behavior” simulations (the funniest lie of all)

People aren’t using protocols.

They’re auditioning for them.

3. Protocols joined the game (and made it worse)

Here’s the uncomfortable truth:

Protocols know what’s happening.

And instead of stopping it, many leaned in.

Why?

Because fake engagement still looks like growth.

So we got systems that quietly reward:

• activity over retention
• volume over conviction
• complexity over usefulness

And suddenly:

“Fake it till you earn it” became product strategy.

We ended up with engagement loops that feel productive but often collapse after the snapshot.

It’s like building a gym where everyone is only there the day before weigh-ins.

4. The hidden cost: hollow ecosystems

On paper, metrics look amazing:

• TVL spikes
• wallet counts explode
• transaction activity goes vertical

But underneath?

A ghost city after the snapshot.

When incentives leave, so does the “community.”

What remains is:

• abandoned liquidity pools
• inactive wallets
• Discord servers full of “gm” messages from three months ago
• founders quietly pretending that “market conditions changed.”

The harsh reality:

If your ecosystem dies when rewards stop, it was never alive—it was rented.

5. The moment airdrops stop working

Here’s the big question: what happens when the meta breaks?

We’re already seeing early signals:

1. Fatigue

Users are tired of optimizing 14-step farming strategies for diminishing returns.

2. Skepticism

People now assume every “points system” is just delayed disappointment.

3. Capital inefficiency

Farmers rotate faster than protocols can even measure behavior properly.

So the loop starts collapsing:

• Incentives lose signal value
• Farming becomes noise
• Protocols can’t distinguish real users from professional farmers
• Real users leave because everything feels gamed

Eventually, the system stops rewarding anything meaningful.

6. The irony: incentives created anti-incentives

Airdrops were supposed to bootstrap adoption.

Instead, they created:

• short-term behavior maximization
• fake retention metrics
• mercenary user bases
• endless “points meta” economies

In trying to incentivize real usage, protocols accidentally incentivized optimized non-usage behavior.

That’s the paradox:

The more you reward behavior, the less meaningful that behavior becomes.

7. What comes next (if anything survives)

The next phase won’t be “no airdrops.”

It will be smarter ones—or at least more resistant to farming:

• Rewards tied to long-term retention, not snapshots
• Reputational systems instead of pure activity metrics
• Economic design that punishes rotation velocity
• Or (controversial take) fewer incentives altogether

But the biggest shift won’t be technical.

It’ll be philosophical:

Stop asking “how do we get users to farm us?”
Start asking “why would someone stay if there’s nothing to farm?”

Final thought

The Airdrop Industrial Complex is what happens when incentives become the product instead of the tool.

It built one of the most creative economies in crypto history…

…and one of the most fragile.

Because anything designed to be gamed will be gamed.

And once the game stops being fun, or profitable, or worth optimizing—

Players leave.

No announcement. No drama.

Just empty wallets where “engagement” used to be.

REQUEST AN ARTICLE

Bankrupt crypto exchange FTX’s sister company Alameda Research “unstaked” roughly $16 million worth of Solana’s SOL token and moved the same to an address linked to creditor repayments, according to data source Arkham.

Unstaking refers to the process of withdrawing crypto assets that were previously locked up in a proof-of-stake (PoS) network to help secure the blockchain and earn rewards.

The latest move follows a familiar pattern: unstake coins and route them to addresses used to reimburse creditors. About a month ago, Alameda did the same, directing funds to the same distribution address. That prior move ultimately raised expectations that the funds were part of an ongoing creditor repayment process tied to the firm’s restructuring.

While there has been no formal confirmation that this specific tranche will be distributed imminently, the repetition of the pattern suggests continuity in the process rather than an isolated movement.

SOL, the native token of programmable blockchain Solana, has a market capitalization of $47.26 billion, which makes it the seventh-largest digital asset in the world. As of writing, SOL traded near $82, largely unchanged on a 24-hour basis, but down significantly from its all-time high of $293 hit in January last year.

Alameda, founded by Sam Bankman-Fried in 2017, began as a quantitative trading shop focused on arbitrage opportunities in digital assets, exploiting price differences across exchanges and markets.

At its peak, Alameda was a major liquidity provider across crypto markets and was deeply embedded in the ecosystem, trading billions in volume and operating across spot, derivatives, and structured products.

Alameda still holds about 3.5 million SOL worth $294.10 million, per Arkham.

The South Korean central bank has called for cryptocurrency exchanges to implement their own “circuit breakers” to pause trading and prevent market panic after a clerical error at Bithumb led to the accidental transfer of $42 billion in Bitcoin to its customers.

The Bank of Korea (BOK) stated in a payments report released Monday that officials should adopt trading curbs modeled after the Korea Exchange to freeze activity during sudden price swings. 

This recommendation follows a massive clerical error in February, where Bithumb, one of the country’s largest platforms, accidentally distributed over $40 billion in Bitcoin to its users.

The central bank highlighted a significant gap in oversight between digital asset platforms and traditional finance. “Currently, the virtual asset industry lacks internal control mechanisms and faces lower regulatory intensity compared to established financial institutions,” the BOK noted. 

Officials argued that new rules are essential to prevent a repeat of recent disruptions, stating, “Consequently, as similar incidents could occur at other virtual asset exchanges, it is necessary to strengthen relevant regulations to prevent them in advance.”

The proposal arrives as South Korean legislators work on a new regulatory framework for the industry. The BOK urged that these specific safety measures be woven into the upcoming laws “to enhance the safety and transparency of virtual asset exchange operations.”

The Bithumb incident

The push for reform stems from an early February event where Bithumb mistakenly sent out 620,000 Bitcoin—valued at roughly $42 billion at the time—to customers. The error occurred when the system processed a transfer as cryptocurrency instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won, a sum worth only about $400.

The massive influx of coins triggered an immediate market crash on the platform. As recipients began selling their windfall, other investors panicked, further dragging down the price. 

While Bithumb managed to halt trading and reverse most of the transfers within minutes, 1,788 BTC had already been liquidated. The exchange had to use its own corporate reserves to cover the resulting $125 million shortfall.

To mitigate such risks, the central bank suggested that platforms must deploy systems specifically designed to catch “erroneous payments caused by human error.” 

The report also recommended a requirement for exchanges to run automated checks that sync internal records with blockchain data to immediately spot any asset discrepancies.

Crypto whales have continued to load up on the TRUMP memecoin ahead of the luncheon at US President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida this month, which offers entry to the largest holders.

One whale withdrew about 105,754 TRUMP from Binance on Saturday to add to its stash of 1.13 million TRUMP, worth about $3.2 million, according to blockchain analytics firm Lookonchain said in an X post on Sunday.

Two days earlier, another whale withdrew 850,488 Trump from the crypto exchange Bybit.

On Monday, another holder increased their TRUMP stash to more than 368,000 tokens after withdrawing from BitMart, and a fourth whale boosted their stash to over one million tokens after withdrawing from Bybit, according to blockchain explorer Solscan.

Critics have accused Trump of using his position as US president for personal financial gain through the scheme. Democratic lawmakers have introduced bills to limit political influence and profits from memecoins.

The top 297 token holders are invited to a luncheon on April 25 at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence. The event has billed the president as the keynote speaker and offered a private reception for the top 29 holders, despite the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner in Washington, D.C., being the same day.

TRUMP drops 33% since March announcement

Trump’s announcement of the luncheon in March saw TRUMP spike more than 50% to a peak of $4.35. However, the memecoin has since dropped by over 33% to trade at $2.80 as of Monday, according to CoinGecko.

Dominick John, an analyst at Zeus Research, told Cointelegraph the price is likely being pushed lower as retail-driven market selling overwhelms already thin liquidity, forcing continuous repricing.

“At the same time, insider supply overhang means even small distributions from concentrated wallets can absorb whale bids, limiting any meaningful upside follow-through,” he added.

Crypto data analytics platform CoinCarp lists 642,882 TRUMP holders, with over 91% of the supply concentrated among the top 10 wallets and over 97% among the top 100 wallets.

Token spiked after the crypto gala announcement last year

Trump held his first “crypto gala” dinner in May 2025, a few months after his Jan. 20 inauguration as US president, which drew concern from critics who accused him of using his position for personal financial gain.

Related: Bessent ramps up pressure on Congress to pass CLARITY Act

The token peaked at $15.59 about a month before the event, but fell as the event drew closer, gradually falling to $8.90 a month after the event.

John said this time around, the token could stage a recovery, with the 2026 midterms acting as a potential sentiment multiplier and other positive announcements. Catalysts and early signs of institutional accumulation could help establish a floor and trigger reflexive upside, he said.

“One catalyst to watch is the potential for event-driven launches like the Trump Billionaire Game, which could generate the social buzz needed to drive short-term upside momentum,” John added. 

Magazine: Bitcoin quantum-safe without upgrade? CZ’s 2031 crypto vision: Hodler’s Digest, April 5 – 11