Politics
Euphoria Season 3 Reviews: Critics Aren’t Convinced By New Direction
After keeping fans waiting for more than four years, Euphoria is finally back for its third (and, quite probably, final) outing.
Unfortunately, the majority of critics are saying that the new episodes have not exactly been worth the wait.
Because of the delay between seasons, creator Sam Levinson took the decision to age up his teenage characters, with season three reintroducing the usual gang – played by returning stars Zendaya, Jacob Elordi, Sydney Sweeney, Hunter Schafer et al – as young adults.
However, early reviews have said that the show loses its footing in this change, and while there’s been praise for the cast’s performances, critics are not convinced by Euphoria’s new direction – with some even going as far as saying that the new episodes indulge the show’s worst tendencies.
With that in mind, here’s a selection of what critics are saying about Euphoria season three so far…
“The show has lost its zeitgeisty edge. Euphoria has become a series with very little to say, none of it very audacious or compelling.”
“A show which was once blackly funny is now humourless torture porn […] Euphoria season three is grim TV that seems hellbent on rattling us for the sake of it. If its cast seemed desperate to get it over and done with, well, now we know why.”
“Euphoria may still have the gloss, budget and star power of prestige TV, but it’s no longer enough to disguise what increasingly feels like the misogynistic fantasies of a creepy old man.”
“In a first season that emerged at a more progressive moment for pop culture, it took an equal-opportunity approach to exploitation. Now that sexism is in again, its default to the hetero male gaze is unmistakable.”
“As Euphoria’s creator, writer, and director, Sam Levinson wants to craft a show about the pervasiveness of fentanyl, the dangers of addiction, and the lawlessness of the American West. Instead, what he’s made — yet again — is a cannily shot phantasmagoria that’s as beautifully lit as it is emotionally hollow.”
“Euphoria always skewed nihilistic, so none of these ideas are out of place in what may be its last season. But Levinson’s series was never this spiritually hollow, and it was always more active, insistent, and ambitious.”
“The first three episodes of season three (out of an eventual eight) do feel like Euphoria: bombastic, stylish and able to offset grandiosity with sly, cutting humor. What they don’t feel like is tethered to the grounding ballast that kept the first two seasons on the rails even at their most over-the-top.”
“The transfer across to the world of adulthood quite simply [falls] short. Not only has the show lost its way: it’s become a bizarre parody of its former self […] Zendaya’s performance, revealing Rue’s struggles, is a shining light in this disappointing return.”
“There’s a great show lurking in here somewhere. So much of Rue’s journey proves it. Yet Euphoria keeps smothering that greatness with something far grosser, and that’s something no amount of reinvention can hide.”
“Television’s Mount Rushmore of antiheroes and antiheroines is crowded, and if Zendaya’s Rue isn’t carved into the primary peak, she’s somewhere immediately adjacent. But the series as a whole?
“Attention-demanding things that played as extreme and terrifying when they were happening to teenagers simply become ‘things’ when the protagonists are in their 20s; heightened ideas that played as gloriously melodramatic and precariously edgy expressed through high-schoolers barely count as ‘ideas’ when run through a 20-something prism.”
“It is testament to how well-rounded the world of Euphoria is that these new episodes feel true to their characters and an accurate continuation of the saga. Levinson’s spectacular misfire on The Idol shouldn’t detract from his ability to construct tense, witty and morally knotty plots. Against those scripts, his actors (who reports suggest had been lukewarm on a return to the show) appear to be having great fun.”
“Dazzling […] This is Euphoria with a much wider canvas. Before, it was a slickly stylish Instagram-friendly tale of various teenagers from a middle-class suburb in Los Angeles doing irresponsible things. Now they are in their 20s and the terrifying expanse of adult life symbolised by the dusty desert lies ahead.”
Euphoria returns on 13 April on Sky, Now and HBO Max, with new episodes every Monday.
‘Young Bob’ is a Gen-Z British activist who was previously in the pocket of the American right. While he’s most famous for being repeatedly beaten up, he’s also known for talking complete and utter shite.
His most recent example of this was seen here:
“Why are young people flocking to Restore Britain?”
I spoke to Britain’s youngest elected councillor, who recently defected to Restore Britain, on why young people are moving towards this new right-wing political party. pic.twitter.com/y9j1zne2BL
— Young Bob (@YoungBobRB) April 12, 2026
The problem with the above is that young people aren’t flocking right; they’re demonstrably moving left, and in numbers too big to ignore.
Oh, and don’t punch Young Bob if you see him on the street.
If nothing else, it will only give him another month’s worth of content.
Gen-Z aren’t ‘flocking’ anywhere
For those who are unfamiliar, Restore Britain is a Reform UK breakaway party. It exists because the Reform guys with the least agreeable personalities decided that the party wasn’t anti-social enough.
While the new party claims to have over 100,000 members, this is disputed:
It’s been a few months now since Restore started, and there’s still no official membership portal.
They have 120,000 donations which could be anywhere around the world, but they don’t have members. https://t.co/kuPU11Zkrm pic.twitter.com/fQNcxIaKH7
— Curtis Daly (@CurtisDaly_) April 11, 2026
In the video at the top, Young Bob is interviewing Kieran Mishchuk. We covered Mishchuk when he was still with Reform, and we did so because he was a brazen bullshitter who got caught in a lie:
GBNews speaking to “random residents”.
Only he’s actually a Reform UK councillor (Kieran Mishchuk, representing 20 mins down the road) being platformed like they’re a random resident.
No one has a problem with the flag, give it a rest.
It doesn’t belong to Reform UK and… https://t.co/gihgI4tlQr pic.twitter.com/7HuFbTWxMl
— Reform Party UK Exposed 🇬🇧 (@reformexposed) October 14, 2025
He’s also – much like Young Bob – the sort of young person that you’d describe as a ‘briefcase wanker’.
Appealing or appalling?
In the video, Young Bob asks:
Why do you think Restore is appealing to so many young people?
Mishchuk answers:
I think it’s common sense really and pride as well, patriotism, hope, stuff that the left the left wing parties that they don’t really clamp on is the history. When you come from a working town like Sittingbourne… you’ve got hundreds of years of history, and you’ve got generations of family members that have done the same thing, and over the last hundred years that industry that was there is gone.
In Sittingbourne, it was paper, bricks, and barges that were built. On my granddad’s side of the family, it was barges. They used to build and design barges. That industry, that boat industry is gone. It’s just completely gone.
Okay, but in the time that all happened, we had a procession of right-wing neoliberal governments.
What do you think Thatcherism was?
Thatcher said her greatest legacy was Tony Blair.
And now we’ve got Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves doing an even worse tribute act.@TheGreenParty say tax the super rich, nationalise our public services and strengthen workers rights.
— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) March 19, 2024
If you don’t know, Thatcherism was the ideology of selling off everything that wasn’t nailed down and handing off sovereignty to the City of London.
It wasn’t a left-wing project.
What the fuck are you talking about, Kieran?
Leftwards shift
All that aside, young people aren’t interested in Restore anyway:
Young people (18-24s) are 22x more likely to support Zack Polanski’s Green Party than Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain.
The British youth are the most progressive in the history of this country.
Do not let anyone convince you otherwise. https://t.co/JJyUiZ0LHS pic.twitter.com/UkghCql9Jt
— thelefttake (@thelefttake) April 12, 2026
Other than that, though, lads – good work.
We can see why young people are flocking towards your movement.
Featured image via Young Bob
Prince William makes £1.5m a year in taxpayers’ money renting Dartmoor prison to the HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS). Whilst this in itself is a bloody outrage, it gets worse. HMP Dartmoor is utterly unusable – a wildlife-infested pit filled with radon gas.
HMP Dartmoor was forced to close its doors due to dangerous levels of the radioactive gas back in July 2024. In both 2020 and 2023, parts of the prison showed radon levels ten-times the legal limit.
Radon is the UK’s second-highest cause of lung cancer, after smoking. Since being left empty the property has become infested with “rats, birds, bats and insects”, according to the Times.
However, the rental agreement is apparently locked-in until 2033. As such, the public looks set to pay up to £68m leasing the useless building over the course of the contract. Over the 2024/25 financial year, William made around £23m from the Duchy of Cornwall portfolio, of which HMP Dartmoor is just one part.
Prince William: The Duchy Files
Back on 2 November 2024, the Times and Channel 4’s Dispatches broke a story on the massive property empire making Charles and William millions a year. The extent of the portfolio was a closely guarded secret, even from Parliament. The Times reported that:
In a five-month investigation, we used the royal addresses to uncover their business contracts and discovered how the duchies are making millions of pounds each year by charging government departments, councils, businesses, mining companies and the general public via a series of commercial rents and feudal levies on land largely seized by medieval monarchs.
The Duchy Files show the royals charge for the right to cross rivers; offload cargo onto the shore; run cables under their beaches; operate schools and charities; and even dig graves. They earn revenue from toll bridges, ferries, sewage pipes, churches, village halls, pubs, distilleries, gas pipelines, boat moorings, opencast and underground mines, car parks, rental homes and wind turbines.
At the time, the Canary commented that a large portion of the land was originally seized by medieval monarchs. This shatters the notion that royal privilege is a thing of the past. In very real ways, the Royal Family is still living in the Medieval Ages, and we’re all paying the price.
Likewise, we also reacted with fury at the fact the monarchy was actively draining money from charities. This included charging massive amounts of rent to Macmillan and Marie Curie. Damningly, the royals are patrons and notable donors to both institutions.
‘Blind panic’
Since the Duchy Files exposé, William has stopped charging rent for village halls, school playing fields, the fire service, and lifeboat stations. However, he’s still raking in the cash from HMP Dartmoor. That’s in spite of the fact the property’s even more unfit for human habitation than the average prison.
Since its closure some 23 months ago, the public has paid prince William at least £2.5m for the defunct prison. The Duchy of Cornwall has refused to comment on whether it will review the rent contract. Instead, the Duchy stated that:
The lease of HMP Dartmoor reflects long-standing arrangements governing the site and was negotiated on a standard commercial basis with both parties taking independent advice. We remain in regular contact with the Ministry of Justice, as it determines the future of the prison.
Public accounts committee MPs stated back in January that senior civil servants renewed the HMP Dartmoor lease in 2023 “in a blind panic”. Reportedly, the responsible parties knew about the prison’s radon levels, but wanted to secure prison places.
Nevertheless, the prison has since had to relocate its 682 inmates. It’s also reportedly hemorrhaging a further £4m a year in an attempt to secure the empty building and improve its ventilation. Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, the Tory chair of the accounts committee, called the MoJ’s handling of the affair “an absolute disgrace”:
We heard claims that the leasing of this unusable building, known for years by HMPPS to be choked with radon gas with all the health risks that entailed, was sensible, driven by the need for prison places. […]
Our committee rejects this excuse outright. Dartmoor appears to the committee [to be] a perfect example of a department reaching for a solution, any solution, in a blind panic and under pressure.
‘Highest possible value for taxpayer money’
At the same time, over 100 staff and prisoners held at Dartmoor have since taken legal action against the Ministry of Justice over radon-induced illness. They join a total of 750 similar legal claimants from 42 prisons and probation facilities across the country with dangerous radon levels.
HMPPS said:
We continue to assess safety and feasibility at HMP Dartmoor, and will make a decision on the site in due course that prioritises the highest possible value for taxpayer money.
As there is an ongoing [Health and Safety Executive] investigation and live legal proceedings, it would be inappropriate to comment further, but we have strengthened radon management across the prison estate in line with regulatory requirements.
A fine demonstration of completely avoiding the issue there.
So, just to recap – prince William is making more than a million a year renting an unlivable prison to HMPPS. The civil servants who signed the contract knew it had illegal levels of radon. However, they were in a panic to find prison spaces. The contract won’t run out until 2033.
In the meantime, the MoJ has still had to relocate the inmates, after having endangered their lives by knowingly locking them in a building full of radioactive gas. Now, the public is also on the hook for the lawsuit, as well as the ongoing bill to try to make HMP Dartmoor useable again.
This utter farce has exposed two things more than any others. First, our absurd rush for prison places is putting lives at risk. Alongside this, it’s acting as a black hole for public money.
And second, for all that we pretend our monarchy is a defunct fossil, they’re clearly still reaping the benefits of a ancient feudal land system. It’s long past time we ended this ridiculous rulership by blood rights for good – starting with the crown’s ownership of 52,000 hectares of UK land.
Featured image via the Canary
Leaders from across the UK’s faith spectrum have come together to urge MPs to remove a clause from the Crime and Policing Bill that could shut down lawful, conscience-led protest.
Quakers in Britain coordinated the joint letter. Signatories include Bishop Mike Royal, Rabbi Gabriel Kanter-Webber, Indarjit Singh and 16 other faith and belief leaders. The letter warns that the Bill’s new ‘cumulative disruption’ clause is too vague and too broad.
The clause requires police to consider previous and planned protests in the same area when deciding whether to impose conditions on a demonstration. As the letter states:
It could mean that we are stopped from demonstrating because another protest previously took place in the same area, even if it was on a completely different issue.
The letter comes as the Bill returns to the House of Commons on 14 April. This follows its third reading in the Lords on 25 March.
The Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, and Buddhist leaders say that despite their differences, they share a common commitment to love and justice. Members of all their faith communities follow their conscience to protest peacefully on issues that matter to them, they said.
And they point out that peaceful protest has often involved cumulative action. Campaigns that changed the world, from the suffragettes to communities standing up against fracking, built up through repeated, sustained demonstration.
Their concern resonates widely. The Equality and Human Rights Commission has called the clause too broadly drafted. The UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly recently met UK civil society organisations and MPs. And she expressed serious concern about these repressive new laws and the clause on cumulative disruption in particular.
This Bill is the third piece of anti-protest legislation in recent years. The faith leaders’ letter says:
Peaceful protest motivated by faith, belief and love should be celebrated, not criminalised. We urge the government and MPs to drop the clause on cumulative disruption.
Featured image via the Canary
Iran has proven to be incredibly resilient in their ability to defend themselves against the US and Israel’s war. Their resistance hasn’t been limited to the battlefield either. Surprising many, Iran has deployed wartime propaganda that’s even proving popular with their supposed enemies.
This is no mean feat.
And out of all the propaganda they’ve pumped out, none has been more effective than the Lego videos.
Given the success of this content, it’s unsurprising to see US tech companies closing ranks with the US war machine:
YouTube bans Explosive Media channel (the one creating a lot of Iran Lego propaganda videos). More proof of the systemic moderation bias of US Silicon Valley companies, magnified when it comes to US foreign policy interests https://t.co/mdIbmdGJ7g
— Marc Owen Jones (@marcowenjones) April 11, 2026
Iran channel: legone but not forgotten
The suspension came hours after the group’s latest video, a rap animation linking Trump to the Epstein files, went viral, garnering millions of views.
Our YouTube channel just got taken down again for “violent content.”
Seriously! are our LEGO-style animations actually violent?
— Explosive Media (@ExplosiveMediaa) April 9, 2026
We’re not sure why YouTube chose to blame “violent content” when they could have said Explosive Media are using:
- The Lego company’s intellectual property.
- AI (which in most circumstances is dogshit).
Equally, however, there are two clear reasons for allowing the videos:
- They’re very, very funny.
- They’re allowing global citizens to bond over their hatred of US imperialism.
Marc Owen Jones noted that while YouTube banned Explosive Media, they’ve left more reprehensible accounts standing:
If you want to know how absurd and biased the banning of the anti-US/Israel war Lego AI Youtube channel for violent content is, look at official accounts belonging to the IDF and the Whitehouse across all platforms. It’s literally videos of real people getting blown up.
Clearly, YouTube takes Lego rights more seriously than human rights.
These videos have proven so effective, by the way, that even right-wingers like Tim Dillon are acknowledging that Iran is winning the propaganda war:
LMAO literally LMAO 😭😂🤣 pic.twitter.com/lLP5G14fJw
— Furkan Gözükara (@FurkanGozukara) April 11, 2026
In the clip above, Dillon says:
So we’ve lost. There’s nowhere to go. It’s checkmate. We can’t do the things we think we can.
We’re tweeting. We’re Truth Socialing… We’re trying to win the war on social media. And we’re not even doing that because – can you, do you have the Lego thing up? Can you get that Lego video?
We’re not even winning the shit talking war.
We’re not even winning that.
The shit talk?
You’d think America would win that, at least.
If we’re going to win one thing, we’re getting bodied by Iranian AI in the war of shit talk.
Truly, how embarrassing.
We’re the country that invented shit talk, and we’re getting lit up.
Explosive Media
The BBC spoke to the creator behind Explosive Media, who described Iran as a “customer”. The piece noted:
The overriding message of these videos is that Iran is resisting what it sees as an almighty global oppressor: the United States.
This isn’t really up for dispute at this point, given that Trump keeps openly threatening countries around the globe, and also threatening to wipe out entire civilisations. We know the BBC is supposed to be impartial, but saying the sky is blue isn’t bias.
The BBC continued:
The clips are garish and not subtle at all – but that hasn’t put a dent in how vigorously people are sharing and commenting on them.
If the BBC wants sophisticated and subtle, maybe they should resume greenlighting shows like The Thick of It.
The next part was a fair description anyway:
In one of the videos, Donald Trump falls through a whirlwind of “Epstein file” documents as rap lyrics tell us “the secrets are leaking, the pressure is rising”.
In another, George Floyd can be seen under a policeman’s boot as we hear Iran is “standing here for everyone your system ever wronged”.
The next bit was just asinine:
The videos are also littered with factual inaccuracies – so we ask Mr Explosive about them.
In one clip, the Iranian military is shown capturing a downed US fighter-jet pilot. US officials have confirmed the downed airman – who was stranded in a remote, mountainous region of Iran after his aircraft was shot down – was rescued by US special forces on 4 April.
Oh my gosh! You’re telling me the Lego propaganda video contained factual inaccuracies?
Goodness gracious, does this mean president Trump isn’t actually a 1 inch tall plastic doodad?
Good lord.
The interesting question to ask is this: why are people in the West so disgusted with their governments that they share the propaganda of their supposed enemies?
The answer is because our Western governments are disgusting, bloodthirsty capitalists.
The BBC are choosing to treat this phenomenon as a ‘fake news’ problem, anyway, rather than as a symptom of an empire in collapse:
Social media platforms have been shutting down accounts with the Lego-style videos, but new ones seem to pop up just as quickly.
Yes, if only we could stop the AI Lego accounts popping up; then the public would just love all the endless genocide.
So-called ‘cyber warfare expert’ Tine Munk told the BBC:
Traditional diplomacy doesn’t exist here. And it blurs our understanding of what is happening. But it also increases the risk of misinterpretation and escalation.
I don’t know, Tine, I feel like the real risk of escalation comes from Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu constantly escalating the actual war.
The Military Industrial Slopfest
Munk is correct that these accounts keep popping up:
NEW 🇮🇷: Lego Style Music Video from Iran via PersiaBoi Studios
Titled: Hormuz Hustle
They are SO FAST. This is in respone to Trump’s new blockaid on the Strait of Hormuz, starting tomorrow. https://t.co/xNKu7NZRwj pic.twitter.com/XkOWEAElj1
— Ryan Rozbiani (@RyanRozbiani) April 13, 2026
The Americans have worked tirelessly for 80 years to embed a global system of greed and individualism. What that looks like in 2026 is a reality in which the people of the world find novel ways to extract profit from the US’s imperial activity – in this instance through the creation of satirical slop videos.
Recognising that this is all bad doesn’t change the fact that these videos are capturing certain truths. The US is a decadent plastic republic run by a would-be king, and its values are as phony as the videos making fun of it.
Featured image via Explosive Media
Expert comment provided by Prof Adam Hart, professor of conservation ecology at the University of Gloucestershire.
In the UK, hospitalisations from false widow spiders reached 100 in 2025.
That’s significantly higher than the figure from a decade before (47 hospitalisations in 2015).
Some have called the false widow spider the UK’s most “dangerous,” though speaking to HuffPost UK, Prof Adam Hart, professor and entomologist, said “serious reactions are rare”.
We asked him why these numbers are rising, how to spot false widow spiders, and what to do if we see them.
Why are more people getting hospitalised by false widow bites?
False widows are so called because they look like the more dangerous black widow spiders. They were probably introduced to the UK in the 1800s from the Canary Islands.
But their population has been growing here since the 80s, which the expert told us might be why we’re hearing a lot more about their bite.
“Reports of rising hospitalisations from false widow bites perhaps need a bit of context,” he explained.
“The noble false widow has spread widely across the UK in recent decades, so people are encountering them more often. At the same time, media coverage has raised awareness, meaning more people notice them and are more likely to seek medical advice. That could make the issue seem bigger than it really is.”
Additionally, they stay relatively close to humans: “They tend to live around buildings, in sheds, window frames, and sheltered outdoor spaces.”
That makes contact likelier as their numbers grow.
Though noble false widow spiders do bite, Prof Hart clarified that this is very rare and, in most cases, relatively harmless.
“Most bites, where they happen at all, are mild, causing local pain and swelling similar to a wasp sting. It’s also worth remembering that, often, suspected ‘spider bites’ turn out to be something else, such as skin infections or insect bites”.
How can I tell if a spider is a false widow?
“False widows are glossy, dark spiders with a rounded abdomen and long legs, often with pale cream markings on the back,” said Prof Hart.
They are usually 7-14mm in length, and the females are generally bigger than the males.
The Natural History Museum describes the pattern on their bodies as “skull-shaped”.
What do I do if I see a false widow spider?
“If you see one, the best advice is simple: leave it alone. If needed, they can be moved with a glass and card,” Prof Hart told us.
“If someone is bitten, basic first aid is usually enough: clean the area, apply a cold compress, and keep an eye on it. Seek medical advice if symptoms worsen or don’t improve.”
And remember, if you can, that while false widows are “now a familiar part of UK wildlife… they really pose a very low risk to most people.”
A paper published in the Journal of Intelligence has found that people who listen to music with less emotionally positive lyrics appear to have slightly higher levels of projected intelligence.
Scientists tracked the smartphone activity of 185 participants over five months, creating a custom app to check the kinds of music they listened to.
The researchers also asked the people involved to take a test, which measured their fluid reasoning, vocabulary comprehension, and math knowledge. Combined, these gave the study authors a way to measure their cognitive ability.
By the end of the analysis, which involved advanced machine learning tasked with finding links between participants’ music taste and their cognitive test scores, they found “small but reliable associations”.
Lyrics seemed to matter most
The participants listened to 58,247 songs overall.
Speaking to PsyPost, study author Larissa Susst said: “When we looked more closely at how our prediction models worked and which aspects of music listening were most informative, one finding surprised us.
“The lyrics of the songs people listened to were more useful for predicting cognitive ability than the musical features… In other words, the themes and language used in the lyrics seemed to matter more than aspects like tempo or musical key.”
She added that this finding went against previous research, which suggested genre might be a better predictor of predicted intelligence.
While the difference wasn’t huge, lyrics with a “less positive emotional tone” were more strongly linked to higher intelligence in this study. The study authors point out that other papers have linked this to introspection and self-reflection.
And songs whose lyrics focused on the present, those which seemed honest, and those which related to home were also associated with higher cognitive ability.
Those who liked lyrics with more social words and less certain language were likelier to have lower cognitive scores, meanwhile.
Bear in mind, though, that the paper said their “predictive performance was modest”, and that the variance in predicted intelligence was relatively small.
Live vs studio-recorded music may matter too
Another surprising finding was that those who listened to studio-recorded music tended to have higher cognitive scores than people who listened to live recordings.
Listening to more music, and lyrics not in German (this was a German study), was also associated with higher cognitive scores.
“In our study, patterns in people’s music listening contained small but detectable signals related to their cognitive ability, suggesting that the digital traces we leave behind in daily life could potentially help approximate intelligence,” Sust said.
But the differences were so small that she cautioned, “On their own, these effects are therefore likely not strong enough to be practically useful,” and were more likely to become “meaningful if combined with many other types of behavioural data”.
Undoubtedly the biggest story from this year’s Coachella surrounds Justin Bieber and his polarising performance.
Late on Saturday night, The Biebs took to the stage in the California desert for his first of two headlining slots at the iconic music festival, the second of which is due to take place later this week.
While the first half of his set was mostly devoted to tracks from his 2025 album Swag (and its poppier follow-up, Swag II) with stripped-back staging, echoing his performance at the Grammys earlier in the year, the second part is what has really got people talking.
Much has been made about the fact that this section of Justin’s performance saw the chart-topper sitting down to his laptop and pulling up songs from the early years of his career on YouTube, alongside old clips of himself and an assortment of other random viral videos he’s enjoyed over the years.
Since Saturday, there’s been a lot of debate on social media about whether or not fans got their money’s worth from Justin’s stripped-back show, particularly in light of reports that he’s the highest-paid headliner in Coachella history.
This was the opinion shared in The Guardian’s three-star review, which pointed out that “the double standard for effort for female and male pop headliners is… striking”.
“Depending on your level of fandom, the stripped-down vision, with minimal audience asides, read as either radically vulnerable or disappointingly self-interested from reportedly the highest-paid Coachella headliner of all time,” The Guardian’s reporter opined.
Kevin Mazur via Getty Images for Coachella
Rolling Stone also agreed that while “plenty of Beliebers” will have left the set feeling “satiated”, the star largely “missed the mark” with his efforts at Coachella.
However, it should be pointed out that even as headlines about the controversy over Justin’s Coachella show continue to roll in, plenty of critics were quick to praise the show immediately after it ended, with many claiming that there’s “one key point being missed” by his detractors.
This was the line taken in Mamamia’s review, which read: “Critics were baffled as to why a global icon would spend his set scrolling through YouTube like a bored teenager in a bedroom. But that is the point.
“This wasn’t designed to be a high-gloss, choreographed spectacle. We got that from Sabrina Carpenter the night before. This was something else entirely: a walkthrough of his memories. If you expected Justin to simply return to the stage and perform a greatest hits medley, you don’t know him at all.”
A take from a self-professed Belieber published in Vogue also took this stance, pointing out that playing his hits over YouTube “gave the fans what they wanted, in a way that felt cheeky and unserious, which was simply perfect”.
“This was how all of us original Beliebers first experienced him, surfing YouTube videos in barely 360p,” Vogue’s critic argued. “The concept just worked.”
Mashable’s review was also along these lines, claiming: “Bieber was not just revisiting old clips; he was revisiting the child the internet turned into Justin Bieber.”
It continued: “Many former child stars look back at old footage, and it feels a bit silly or even sad. Here, though, Bieber seemed genuinely at peace with it. He smiled at the videos. He harmonised with his younger self, treating him less like a brand asset and more like someone worth meeting again.”
Kevin Mazur via Getty Images for Coachella
Although USA Today praised Justin for creating an intimate environment in a festival setting that felt akin to “chilling at Bieber’s house with him watching videos on YouTube like so many 30-somethings of his generation used to do with their friends”, a piece in Vulture went as far as comparing the show to “performance art”.
“In keeping it simple, and reflecting on his old hits through the portal where he was discovered, the persona of Justin Bieber was reassessed and deconstructed in real time after years of mythos and controversy,” Vulture’s critic claimed.
They then pointed out that by taking fans back through his time in the spotlight – from “heartthrob to millions” to “the world’s punching bag” – the set represented a “career-spanning victory lap and a big step forward in both artistic vision and the performance of self-mockery”.
Vulture’s piece also claimed: “To call his performance lacking in effort is a shallow read.”
“Seeing a baby-faced Bieber on screen at Coachella was a stark reminder of just how long he’s been famous, and while YouTube karaoke felt low-effort compared to a more involved production, it did make for a compelling visual to see the fully grown Bieber sing these songs as his childhood played in the rear view,” The Hollywood Reporter’s own review also claimed, although it went on to claim that the set “became more confounding than profound” as it went on.
Justin will return to Coachella this coming weekend, alongside fellow headliners Sabrina Carpenter and Karol G.
Back in February, he caused a similar buzz at the Grammys, where he delivered another low-key performance that saw him taking to the stage in just boxers from his own fashion brand.
!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”d1367440-2011-4389-a28b-bb92f339da2a”}).render(“69dcfa8ce4b00247ba9c31dc”);});
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
You know what it’s like when you’re shopping for furniture. You think you’ve found the best option out there, only to click onto another page and find five more contenders.
Then you click on to Instagram or Pinterest, and lo and behold: another thirty ads showing you another iteration of what you’ve been looking for. Thanks, cookies!
If you’re anything like me, plagued by decision paralysis, it takes months of open tabs, waiting for sales, and constant side-by-side comparison to actually make a purchase.
That’s speaking as someone who does a lot of shopping (it’s kinda in the job description) and even then, if I can do anything to make the process of furniture shopping easier, that is as big a blessing as I can ask for.
Pinterest has been my saving grace up until now: I love making boards of what I want my space to look like and using its shopping feature to find products.
But even that is flawed: often, the pieces I fall for aren’t even available to ship to the UK, or they come from some dodgy website I’m not willing to risk losing my money to.
So when I came across ShopHomeStyles, I was completely smitten.
Instead of having to guess what keywords would best describe the armchair I’m currently looking for in my room (I’m not exactly an interiors expert) the platform allows you to upload your inspo photos.
Sourcing from over 100 furniture and homeware brands like M&S, OKA, and Soho Home, the platform then matches the closest products to your inspo or keyword search in seconds.
So you don’t have to keep millions of tabs open, you can like the products you’re into and organise them into collections, making it easy to come back to them later.
Plus, if you’re not sure what style tickles your fancy, the website has its own inspiration page and breaks furniture and decor into easy to browse categories, so you can browse trends and shop by item, or look at what’s new in at your favourite stores, too.
Basically, if you want anything new for your house and want to save on scrolling through the sometimes hundreds of pages on every furniture site you come by, ShopHomeStyles seriously whittles your options down based on what you like.
The result? Less wasted time scrolling, and a place to curate your own design style for your home.
If I had known about this platform sooner, it could have saved me oodles of time. That armchair I’ve been looking for has been the subject of probably a years’ worth of Pinterest searches.
You see, I’m after a very specific retro Scandi-inspired shape, preferably in pink, red, or baby blue.
At the time of writing this, I have 167 tabs open on Safari on my phone, with various iterations of said chair.
But after simply uploading some Pinterest inspo photos to ShopHomeStyles, there’s one clear contender for my purchase: this Juno armchair from Graham and Green.
Don’t get me wrong, the price tag is definitely something to work towards. But at least now I can live in peace not having to go back and forth between this option and that.
I’m also shopping for a side table and magazine rack, so I’ve started building a separate collection to find the perfect ones.
While I’m sure I’ll spend as much time deliberating about what to go for in the end, at least my final decision will be based off results from 11 pages on ShopHomeStyle, rather than hundreds, or even thousands.
Honestly, all I can say is: phew.
The government has been continuing the Tory, Lib Dem and New Labour agenda of increased NHS privatisation. And after nearly two years in power, private providers of NHS services have made £1.6bn in profit.
The research
The Centre for Health and the Public Interest analysed £12bn worth of contracts, which it emphasised are not all of the NHS’ private provision.
The corporations that received those contracts extracted profit that could have been used for 9,178 doctors or 19,428 nurses over the two year period. Another ten thousand doctors for the NHS would also go some way in addressing the striking resident doctors’ concerns.
The new research takes forward a previous study by We Own It, which found the private sector made an average of £10m a week in profit from 2012-2024.
The Centre for Health and the Public Interest also noted that 131 companies made more than 20% profit from the NHS. Between 8% and 9% are the usual profits for a company.
The study further found that the NHS spent around £2.5bn on companies registered outside the UK or in tax havens.
More and more healthcare privatisation
In January 2025, the prime minister announced he would increase private provision of helath services by 20%. After only his first year in power, NHS privatisation leapt by 10%. If that continues, there will be a 50% increase in privatised NHS services by the end of this parliament.
Some areas have seen much higher increases. In South East London, NHS private provision increased by 71% from July 2024 to July 2025. Other high increases were in Dorset at 51%, along with Cambridgeshire/ Peterborough and Suffolk/ NE Essex at 41% each.
Successive governments know that making people pay outright for NHS services is very unpopular. So they have been gradually turning healthcare into a vehicle for profit through enabling corporations to provide the services with an NHS badge on them. Instead of making people pay at the point of use, it’s through profit from the healthcare budget and public purse.
Featured image via the Canary
SoftBank Group: Positives And Negatives Offset Each Other (OTCMKTS:SFTBY)
Giancarlo quits Willkie to double down on crypto, AI and ‘CryptoDad’ sequel
Gen-Z are not swinging to the right at all
-
Politics3 days agoUS brings back mandatory military draft registration
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Veronica Beard
-
Sports3 days agoMan United discover Nico Schlotterbeck transfer fee as defender reaches Dortmund agreement
-
Tech6 days agoHow Long Can You Drive With Expired Registration? What Florida Law Says
-
Politics1 day agoWorld Cup exit makes Italy enter crisis mode
-
Crypto World4 days agoCanary Capital Files SEC Registration for PEPE ETF
-
Business3 days agoTesla Model Y Tops China Auto Sales in March 2026 With 39,827 Registrations, Beating Cheaper EVs and Gas Cars
-
Politics3 days agoMalcolm In The Middle OG Turned Down ‘Buckets Of Money’ To Appear In Reboot
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin recovers as US and Iran Agree a Ceasefire Deal
-
Fashion6 days agoLet’s Discuss: DEI in 2026
-
NewsBeat18 hours agoPep Guardiola and Gary Neville agree over Arsenal title problem that benefits Man City
-
Business3 days agoOpenAI Halts Stargate UK Data Centre Project Over Energy Costs and Copyright Row
-
Business2 days agoIreland Fuel Protests Enter Day 5 as Blockades Spark Shortages and Government Prepares Support Package
-
Politics3 days agoLBC Presenter Mocks Trump Over Iran War Failures
-
Crypto World3 days agoFederal judge blocks Arizona from bringing criminal charges against Kalshi
-
Tech4 days agoA version of Windows 10 released a decade ago is now eligible for additional security patches
-
NewsBeat1 day agoJD Vance announces ‘no agreement’ with Iran over nuclear weapons fear
-
Entertainment5 days agoAlfred Hitchcock’s 10 Most Suspenseful Masterpieces, Ranked
-
Entertainment3 days agoA ‘Bridgerton’ Star’s New Survival Thriller Is a Must-Watch on Netflix This Weekend
-
Business3 days agoIMF retains floor for precautionary balances at SDR 20 billion
You must be logged in to post a comment Login