Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

House Rejects Iran War Resolution 213-214

Published

on

House Rejects Iran War Resolution 213-214

The House voted to reject a resolution Thursday directing President Trump to remove US armed forces from hostilities against Iran, 213 to 214, falling one vote short along almost entirely party lines.

Summary

  • Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York proposed the resolution directing the president to end military action in Iran unless explicitly authorized by Congress; it failed 213–214 on Thursday, one day after the Senate voted 52–47 to reject a similar measure.
  • Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky was the lone Republican to support the measure; Rep. Jared Golden of Maine was the sole Democrat to vote against it; Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio voted “present” and three Republicans did not vote.
  • Democrats described the effort as forcing Republicans on the record defending an unpopular war that has driven up gas prices and weighed on GOP approval ratings ahead of November’s midterms.

The Republican-controlled House voted 213–214 Thursday to reject a war powers resolution that would have directed President Trump to end US military involvement in Iran without explicit congressional authorization. The vote was nearly identical in partisan breakdown to the Senate’s 52–47 rejection of a similar measure the day before.

Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York proposed the measure, stating on the House floor: “Donald Trump has dragged the American people into a war of choice, launched without congressional authorization.”

Advertisement

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky was the only Republican to vote in favor of the resolution, continuing a consistent position he has held on war powers across multiple votes this year. Rep. Jared Golden of Maine was the sole Democrat to vote against it.

Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio, who had previously voted to end the Iran war in an earlier round, voted “present” on Thursday. Three Republicans did not cast a vote at all, which effectively tightened the margin and allowed the resolution to fail by a single vote rather than by the three-vote cushion their absences could have produced.

Why Democrats Kept Forcing the Vote

This was the latest in a series of Democratic war powers resolutions aimed not at passage but at putting Republicans on the record. Bloomberg described the 213-214 tally as “the latest attempt by Democrats to force Republicans to go on record defending the unpopular war,” which has become a persistent political liability for the GOP as 2026 midterms approach.

Advertisement

Gas prices have risen steadily since the war began, and the increasing cost of diesel and fertilizer has fed economic anxiety in districts that Republicans need to hold in November. Rising oil tied to the Strait of Hormuz blockade has elevated consumer prices and weighed on the president’s approval ratings on economic grounds.

The Constitutional Backdrop

Under the US Constitution, only Congress can formally declare war. Presidents retain limited unilateral military authority for immediate self-defense, but legal scholars have long argued that sustained offensive operations require legislative authorization. Democrats have repeatedly invoked the War Powers Resolution of 1973 to force procedural votes, with Republicans voting to sustain the president’s authority each time.

The Senate’s 52–47 vote on April 15 preceded Thursday’s House vote by roughly 24 hours, establishing the same party-line pattern in both chambers. No Republican senator broke ranks.

Market Implications

Financial markets have priced the Iran war as the central geopolitical risk factor of 2026, with oil, equities, and Bitcoin all tracking diplomatic and congressional signals closely. The resolution’s failure removes one potential de-escalation catalyst from this week’s news cycle, though the simultaneous announcement of an Israel-Lebanon ceasefire appears to have provided the larger market-moving signal Thursday afternoon.

Advertisement

Bitcoin jumped 5% to $74,400 on a previous Iran peace signal and has continued to treat any ceasefire-related development as a primary macro catalyst. The failed House resolution reinforces the reality that the Iran conflict has no near-term legislative off-ramp, keeping the diplomatic track via the US-Iran ceasefire framework and potential resumed Islamabad talks as the only active path toward de-escalation.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Bitcoin (BTC) Surges Past $76K as Ceasefire Optimism Fuels Rally and Short Squeeze Potential

Published

on

Bitcoin (BTC) Price

Key Takeaways

  • Bitcoin surged to approximately $76,000 this week, marking its strongest performance in several months, propelled by diplomatic progress between the United States and Iran.
  • President Trump’s announcement of a 10-day Israel-Lebanon truce provided additional momentum, briefly pushing BTC toward the $75,000 threshold.
  • Technical analysts emphasize that a decisive weekly close above $76,000 is essential to validate a genuine trend reversal, with subsequent price objectives ranging from $84,000 to $96,000.
  • Perpetual funding rates for Bitcoin have plunged into deeply negative territory, indicating heavy short positioning that could catalyze a violent short squeeze.
  • Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds recorded $451 million in net inflows on Tuesday, though market watchers stress the need for sustained daily flows to maintain upward momentum.

Bitcoin has emerged as one of the most closely monitored assets over the past several days, reaching a multi-month peak near $76,000 before moderating to approximately $74,700 by Friday morning Asian trading hours. The upward movement reflects a combination of easing geopolitical tensions and renewed appetite from institutional capital.

Bitcoin (BTC) Price
Bitcoin (BTC) Price

The principal driver behind this rally has been growing confidence surrounding the U.S.-Iran ceasefire agreement, which has influenced pricing across various risk-sensitive assets. An additional 10-day cessation of hostilities between Israel and Lebanon, unveiled by President Trump, further bolstered market sentiment. Bitcoin’s price advanced from an intraday bottom near $73,000 to peak at $74,800 in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s statement.

According to Polymarket prediction market data, traders are assigning an 87% likelihood that the U.S.-Iran ceasefire will be prolonged beyond its April 21 deadline. Pakistani officials quoted by Al Jazeera referenced a “major breakthrough” in discussions concerning Iran’s nuclear ambitions, which had represented the primary obstacle during initial negotiation rounds.

Global equity markets participated in the rally, with the MSCI All Country World Index recording a fresh all-time high on Thursday. The S&P 500 similarly achieved a historic peak. This broad risk-on environment provided tailwind support to cryptocurrency markets, with Ether posting weekly gains of 6%, XRP advancing 6.4%, and Dogecoin climbing 5.6%.

Critical Levels According to Market Experts

Analyst Crypto Patel identified “$76K as the level that decides everything,” noting that a higher-timeframe candle close beyond this zone would clear the path toward the $84,000–$96,000 price range. Glassnode data reveals that over 2 million BTC were accumulated within that zone throughout the previous six months.

Trading analytics platform Material Indicators highlighted several layers of technical resistance, including the yearly opening price at $87,500 and the 50-week moving average positioned at $97,000. Analyst Rekt Capital emphasized that BTC requires a weekly close above $72,800 simply to “confirm a breakout.”

The bull score index, a composite measure of overall Bitcoin market strength, climbed to 40 on April 15—its most elevated reading since late October 2025. CryptoQuant analyst Arab Chain observed that the index remains within neutral territory and must breach the 60 threshold to indicate robust bullish conditions.

Extreme Short Positioning Creates Squeeze Scenario

Bitcoin perpetual funding rates have collapsed into deeply negative territory during recent trading sessions, touching levels not observed since 2023. Negative funding rates indicate that short position holders are compensating long position holders—a clear signal of heavy bearish positioning.

Advertisement
Source: Coinglass
Source: Coinglass

Daniel Reis-Faria, CEO of ZeroStack, explained to CoinDesk: “Funding rates this negative tell you the market is heavily short. If Bitcoin continues to move higher despite that, a lot of those positions could get liquidated, and the move can accelerate quickly.” Reis-Faria projected that BTC could climb to $125,000 within the next 30 to 60 days if short positions face forced liquidation.

On-chain analyst CryptoVizArt presented an alternative perspective, observing that Bitcoin’s “True Market Mean” indicates the average active holder is currently holding unrealized losses. Historically, prolonged periods trading beneath this metric have aligned with Bitcoin’s most severe downturns.

Spot Bitcoin ETF activity shows mixed signals, with Tuesday’s trading session producing $451 million in net inflows. Bitcoin’s daily transaction volume recently touched 17-month peaks.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Hyperbridge Confirms Bridged Polkadot Exploit Was 10x Worse Than First Reported

Published

on

Hyperbridge Confirms Bridged Polkadot Exploit Was 10x Worse Than First Reported

Hyperbridge has revised losses from its April 13 exploit to roughly $2.5 million. That is about 10 times the original estimate of $237,000.

The team disclosed the new figure in a post-incident update on April 16. The revision adds losses from associated incentive pools. It also reflects forensic work across four EVM chains.

What the Revised Figure Includes

According to initial reports, an attacker minted 1 billion bridged DOT tokens and liquidated the entire amount in a single transaction, generating 108.2 ETH (roughly $237,000).

However, the team noted that the figure did not reflect the complete situation.

Advertisement

“Following reconciliation of attacker activity across each of the four chains, the two-phase nature of the attack, and losses from the associated incentive pools, the revised total realized loss is approximately $2.5 million, denominated in ETH and DOT at the time of the exploit,” the blog read.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The analysis also clarified the sequence of events leading to the breach. What looked like a single exploit was in fact two linked events about an hour apart.

The attacker initially extracted approximately 245 ETH from the Token Gateway contract. Roughly an hour later, they carried out unauthorized minting of nearly 1 billion bridged DOT tokens.

Advertisement

These were subsequently offloaded into available liquidity across decentralized exchanges.

“On April 13, 2026, an attacker exploited a vulnerability in the Merkle Mountain Range (MMR) proof verification logic, allowing the culprit to mint assets and drain escrowed assets on Token Gateway. This affected DOT token pools on connected EVM networks: Ethereum, Base, BNB Chain, and Arbitrum,” the team explained.

The team emphasized that the exploit remains contained within the Token Gateway and the impacted bridged token contracts on the EVM networks.

Hyperbridge Recovery Path and Compensation

The blog revealed that a significant portion of stolen funds has been traced to Binance. Hyperbridge said it is working with the exchange’s compliance team and law enforcement on asset freezes. The team cautioned that meaningful recovery could take months to a year.

If recovery falls short, affected users will be made whole in BRIDGE tokens, the native asset of the Hyperbridge network. The compensation mechanism and disbursement schedule will be shared on April 13, 2027, exactly one year after the exploit.

Advertisement

“Pursuing recovery first, before any token-based compensation, is in service of affected users. Issuing token compensation prematurely, before on-chain tracing, exchange compliance processes, and law enforcement coordination have been given the time they need to produce results, would dilute the very asset we are committing to affected users and reduce the real value they ultimately receive,” Hyperbridge mentioned.

The team added that the Token Gateway remains paused and will not resume operations until the vulnerability is fully patched, the fix has undergone an independent audit with the report made public, and additional safeguards are implemented and operational. The coming months will test whether Hyperbridge can recover a meaningful share of the stolen funds.

The post Hyperbridge Confirms Bridged Polkadot Exploit Was 10x Worse Than First Reported appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Miners Sell Record 32K BTC in Q1 2026 as Hashprice Pressure Mounts

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Public miners sold over 32,000 BTC in Q1 2026, breaking the previous record set during the 2022 Terra-Luna collapse..
  • Hashprice sits near $33/PH/s/day, below the ~$35 breakeven, leaving roughly 20% of miners operating at a loss.
  • American Bitcoin holds 7,000+ BTC with $25/PH/s production costs, choosing accumulation over selling amid the downturn.
  • New West Data pays under $0.02/kWh using flared gas power, keeping older mining hardware profitable at current hashprice levels.

Public bitcoin miners have unloaded over 32,000 BTC in Q1 2026, setting a new quarterly record. This figure already surpasses total net sales for all of 2025.

Major operators including MARA, CleanSpark, Riot, Cango, Core Scientific, and Bitdeer contributed to the tally. Hashprice currently sits around $33 per PH/s per day, below the estimated $35 breakeven.

Roughly 20% of miners are now operating at a loss amid rising network difficulty and reduced block rewards.

Record Liquidations Reflect Deepening Mining Pressures

The Q1 2026 sell-off exceeds even the roughly 20,000 BTC liquidated during Q2 2022. That quarter saw market turmoil triggered by the Terra-Luna collapse.

The scale of current selling marks a sharp reversal from just over a year ago. Miners ended 2024 with a net addition of 17,593 BTC, pushing combined reserves above 100,000 BTC.

Advertisement

Network difficulty today stands approximately ten times higher than it did in 2021. Block rewards were also cut in half following the 2024 halving event.

Bitcoin’s price remains above its previous cycle peak despite retreating from all-time highs above $120,000. Even so, compressed margins are forcing many operators to liquidate holdings to fund daily operations.

For many miners, selling bitcoin remains the fastest way to shore up balance sheets. Meeting debt obligations in a selective financing environment has become a pressing priority.

Hashprice hovering near all-time lows leaves little room for operators with older, less efficient fleets. Those paying higher electricity costs face the sharpest margin compression.

Total BTC holdings across miners have slipped from roughly 1.86 million in 2023 to around 1.8 million today. The trend points to sustained selling pressure rather than a one-time event.

Aggressive hashrate expansion following China’s 2021 mining ban laid the groundwork for today’s difficult economics. The industry is now absorbing the consequences of that rapid, unchecked growth.

Advertisement

Diverging Strategies Emerge Across the Mining Sector

Not all miners are responding to the downturn by selling. American Bitcoin, the proprietary mining arm of Hut 8, has been actively accumulating.

The company held more than 7,000 BTC as of early April, up from zero a year earlier. Its all-in cash production cost was around $55,000 per bitcoin in Q4 2025, or roughly $25 per PH/s.

Meanwhile, operators with ultra-low power costs maintain a structural edge. New West Data, a Canadian firm mining with flared natural gas, pays below $0.02 per kilowatt-hour for power.

That cost level keeps even older hardware profitable at current hashprice levels. The company tripled its compute capacity in 2025 and plans to do so again this year.

Advertisement

Software optimization is also gaining traction as an alternative to hardware upgrades. Luxor recently launched Commander, a fleet management tool that adjusts power settings every five minutes.

The platform reportedly delivers 8% to 14% profitability gains over traditional curtailment methods. It currently manages about 5 EH/s of customer hashrate since its recent launch.

The broader industry is no longer operating as a uniform block. Power economics, balance sheet strength, and operational sophistication now separate survivors from those under strain.

What was once a scale-driven business is fragmenting into distinct strategic camps. That divergence is likely to grow more pronounced as hashprice pressure continues through 2026.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Zanzibar Probes Crypto Exec Joe McCann After Fiancee’s Death

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Police in Zanzibar are reportedly holding Joe McCann, the founder of crypto hedge fund Asymmetric, for questioning after the death of his fiancée, Ashly Robinson, during a vacation in the archipelago. Robinson, 31, died in hospital on April 9, after staff at a Zanzibar hotel found the couple the day before, according to a statement cited by NBC News.

Authorities have ruled the death a suicide but continue to question McCann. CBS News reported that police are holding McCann’s passport until autopsy results are complete. Hotel staff told investigators the pair had a “misunderstanding” and had been separated, with McCann moved to a different room.

Robinson’s family has disputed that account. Her sister, Alyssa Endres, told NBC News that “none of this makes sense” and that Robinson had been in good spirits after celebrating her birthday and engagement to McCann, which occurred only days before her death.

McCann is the founder of Asymmetric, a crypto venture and hedge fund that has weathered a volatile market cycle. The firm pivoted its trading strategy in July after investor backlash stemming from underperformance amid broad crypto market volatility. A plan for McCann to lead a Solana-based treasury company public in a merger was reportedly called off in August for unknown reasons. The report also notes that McCann had indicated his fund had lost about 80% so far that year. McCann could not be reached for comment.

Advertisement

Key takeaways

  • Authorities in Zanzibar say the death of Ashly Robinson, 31, has been ruled a suicide, but Joe McCann remains in custody for questioning as investigations proceed.
  • McCann’s passport has been held by police pending autopsy results, while hotel staff described a separation between the couple following a reported misunderstanding.
  • Robinson’s family disputes the official account, with relatives saying the narrative doesn’t fit their understanding of her state of mind before the death.
  • Asymmetric, McCann’s crypto venture, has faced performance challenges and strategic shifts, including a July pivot after investor backlash and a previously announced but scrapped merger involving a Solana treasury vehicle.
  • Readers should monitor autopsy results, official statements from Tanzanian authorities, and any response from Asymmetric as the case unfolds.

Investigation and official statements

The sequence of events, as publicly described, centers on a hotel incident in which Robinson was found unresponsive and later died in hospital. Tanzanian police cited by NBC News said the death was ruled a suicide, but the investigation persists and McCann is being questioned. CBS News reported that authorities have retained McCann’s passport until autopsy results are finalized, a routine step in some investigations to ensure cooperation and to verify timelines.

Hotel staff reportedly told investigators that the couple had a misunderstanding and had been separated at one point, with McCann moved to a different room. This detail, while publicly acknowledged, remains part of a broader inquiry that is still awaiting a formal autopsy outcome and other corrobations. As with many such cases, the evolving narrative will depend on official findings and how they align with testimony from those involved.

Asymmetric and the founder’s trajectory

McCann’s role as founder of Asymmetric places the case in a broader context of crypto market activity and the pressures on fund management in a highly volatile era. Asymmetric has publicly navigated a choppy cycle, including a strategic pivot in July after investor backlash over underperformance in a year marked by sharp price swings across digital assets. The pivot, described in retrospective coverage, signaled a shift in trading approach amid ongoing volatility.

The firm’s public narrative also touched on a potential merger involving a Solana-based treasury vehicle that would have seen McCann in a leading role. Reports indicate that this merger plan was called off in August for reasons not disclosed publicly. The timing followed earlier disclosures by McCann that the fund had experienced significant losses—reported at around 80% for the year up to that point—underscoring the stressors that can accompany active crypto trading and venture strategies in unsettled markets.

While these milestones help frame McCann’s professional backdrop, they also illuminate the tensions between visibility and risk in high-profile crypto ventures. For investors, traders, and users following the space, the episode reinforces how personal events surrounding founders can intersect with firm-level risk—and how regulatory and due-diligence considerations can intersect with reputational factors in fund management.

Advertisement

Family perspective and unanswered questions

Beyond the police timeline and corporate background, family members have challenged the official account of events. Robinson’s sister, Alyssa Endres, told NBC News that “none of this makes sense” and emphasized that her sister had celebrated milestones in the days leading up to her death, including her birthday and engagement to McCann. The disparity between the family’s understanding and the authorities’ narrative highlights a wider quest for clarity as autopsy results and investigative conclusions emerge.

The case sits at the intersection of personal tragedy and a highly scrutinized industry. Crypto markets, regulatory scrutiny, and high-profile fund managers have all faced intense public attention in recent years, and incidents like this amplify the challenge of maintaining public trust when the personal and professional lines blur. As investigators work to piece together timelines and corroborate details, the crypto community will be watching for any new statements from Tanzanian authorities, as well as responses from Asymmetric and McCann’s representatives.

In the meantime, the broader market will be tracking how this developing story affects perceptions of crypto investment firms operating in frontier jurisdictions and how such cases might influence governance, due-diligence standards, and risk management practices among hedge funds and family offices active in digital assets.

As the case evolves, the key questions remain: what will autopsy findings reveal, what additional testimony will emerge from the investigation, and how will Asymmetric address concerns raised by investors and counterparties in light of these events?

Advertisement

Readers should stay tuned to official updates from Tanzanian authorities and credible media outlets for new information as autopsy results are released and the investigation progresses. The coming days and weeks will likely determine not only the outcome of the case but also the broader narrative around founder-centered risk in crypto ventures.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

DeFi Hacks Surge After $280M Drift Protocol Exploit

Published

on

Hackers, Hacks, DeFi

At least 12 DeFi protocols and crypto businesses have been attacked in just over two weeks since the $280 million Drift Protocol exploit on April 1.

Attacks aimed at crypto protocols or companies since the start of April include CoW Swap, Hyperbridge, Bybit, Dango, Silo Finance, BSC TMM, Aethir, MONA, Zerion and, most recently, Rhea Finance and the Grinex exchange. 

The Drift Protocol was hit with one of the largest exploits this year on April 1, losing around $280 million in a long-running social engineering attack suspected to involve North Korean-affiliated actors.

The attacks also come amid growing concerns this month that advancing AI models, such as Anthropic’s Claude Mythos and equivalent models, could eventually make it even easier for cyberattackers in the future.

Advertisement

Rhea Finance exploited for $7.6 million

DeFi protocol Rhea Finance reported on Thursday that an attacker “leveraged a vulnerability in Rhea’s Margin Trading feature to execute a coordinated pool manipulation attack,” impacting the Rhea Lend smart contract. 

Hackers, Hacks, DeFi
Rhea Finance updates its users on the exploit. Source: Rhea Finance

Around $7.6 million was extracted, according to blockchain security firm CertiK. 

“The attacker created fake token contracts and added liquidity in fresh pools, likely misleading the oracle and validation layer,” it explained. 

Meanwhile, the Russia-linked Grinex exchange suspended operations after a $13.7 million hack on Thursday, blaming “unfriendly states” for the incursion. 

Related: Stablecoin issuer Circle faces lawsuit over $280M Drift Protocol hack

Advertisement

Another attack this month was aimed at the Binance Smart Chain TMM/USDT liquidity pool, which suffered a reserve manipulation attack, resulting in the loss of around $1.67 million in early April, R3ACH Network analyst Jussy said on Thursday. 

It followed just days after bridge aggregator Dango lost $410,000 from a smart contract bug on April 13.

In the same month, lending protocol Silo Finance lost $392,000 on April 3 from a misconfigured oracle exploit and decentralized GPU cloud computing platform Aethir lost $423,000 in an access control exploit on April 9. 

DPRK ups AI social engineering attacks

The Drift Protocol and Zerion wallet exploits were two examples of Democratic People’s Republic of Korea-affiliated groups using AI and social engineering to infiltrate crypto companies to steal credentials and funds. 

Advertisement

Malicious actors pilfered over $168.6 million in cryptocurrency from 34 DeFi protocols in the first quarter of 2026, according to data from DefiLlama.

Magazine: Forget stablecoin yield, how does the CLARITY Act treat DeFi?