Gamers seeking victory in any fast-paced game will want every frame they can get. Sony designed the INZONE M10S II with this specific purpose in mind, and they accomplished it by including two different modes. Switching between settings is simple on this 27-inch OLED panel. If you keep the resolution at 1440p, the display will run at a scorching 540 hertz. Drop the resolution to 1080p and you’ll be rewarded with an even faster refresh rate of 720 hertz.
That kind of flexibility is invaluable when you’re playing different games with varying demands on your screen. Some titles are all about the details, while others are simply about obtaining that speed, since every millisecond counts. Fortunately, the tandem OLED build of this display keeps the image quality sharp even while switching between modes. Sony also included a brilliant feature called motion blur reduction, which keeps fast-moving objects clear and prevents the screen from becoming too dim even when you’re in the thick of things.
【Epic QD-OLED 500Hz Monitor】 A new generation of gaming monitor is emerging, this new 27 Inch 1440p 500hz monitor adopts QD – OLED panel and…
【Rare 500Hz Refresh Rate & 0.03ms】INNOCN 2780M – Ultra-fast 500Hz OLED display. The faster speed lets you respond quickly to opponents and stay a…
【Powerful Connectivity】 2780M 2560 x 1440p 500hz gaming monitor delivers powerful connectivity: 2 x DP, 2 x HDMI, 1 x 3.5MM Audio Jack, wide…
The display itself is also quite forgiving in terms of placement, since the special anti-glare coating does an excellent job at maintaining visibility regardless of the lighting conditions in your room. With that level of control over reflections, your emphasis remains where it should be: on the game. For the competitive crowd, there is an extra tiny tool in the arsenal known as tournament mode. When you turn it on, the display basically shrinks to 24.5 inches, with black bars on the sides, but you still get the desired high refresh rate.
Ergonomically, the setup feels perfectly natural on almost any workstation. The stand can tilt from minus five to thirty-five degrees and adjusts in height by roughly five inches to maintain your screen at the ideal angle. Plus, it swivels left and right, allowing you to have a good perspective regardless of your preferences.
In terms of input, you have two HDMI 2.1 connections and one DisplayPort 2.1 connector to keep up with the latest graphics cards. Variable refresh rate support almost guarantees that you’ll never have to struggle with those annoying screen tearing bugs. As an added bonus, you get two pre-tuned picture settings for shooter games: one that gives you the familiar look of a regular display, and another that really shows off the OLED panel. Sony plans to sell the monitor for $1,099, with a release later this year. [Source]
India’s government has abandoned its proposal that would require smartphone manufacturers to preinstall the state-owned biometric identification app, Aadhaar, on phones.
India drops proposal mandating Apple preinstall national ID app
In November, India’s Ministry of Communications issued a directive ordering smartphone producers to preload Aadhaar on any phone sold within the country. The order would have affected Apple, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi. According toReuters, India’s IT ministry has since reviewed the proposal and “is not in favour of mandating the pre-installation of the Aadhaar App on smartphones.” The ministry said the decision came after it held a “consultation with stakeholders from the electronics industry.” Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
Although modern-day silvered glass mirrors have pretty much destroyed the market for bronze mirrors, these highly polished pieces of metal once were the pinnacle of mirror technology. Due to the laborious process required these mirrors saw use essentially only by the affluent. That said, how hard would it be to make a bronze mirror today with all of the modern technologies that even a hobbyist can acquire for their shed? Cue [Lundgren Bronze Studios] giving it a shot, starting by casting something flat-ish to start polishing.
Just getting that initial shape to start polishing is a chore, with hammering out the shape possibly being also a viable method. When casting metal it’s tricky to avoid having air bubbles and other defects forming, though using a sand mold seems to help a lot.
After you have the rough shape, polishing using power tools seems like cheating, but as you can see in the video even going from 50 to 8000 grit with a rotating disc left countless scratches. Amusingly, hand sanding did a much better job of removing the worst scratches, following which a polishing compound helped to bring out that literal mirror finish.
A quick glance at the Wikipedia entry for bronze mirrors shows that a tin-bronze alloy like speculum metal was used for thousands of years as it was much easier to polish to a good mirror finish. The metallurgy of what may seem like just a vanity item clearly goes deeper than just polishing up a metal surface.
Kevin Weil, OpenAI’s former chief product officer who was recently tapped to build a new AI workspace for scientists, Prism, is leaving the company, WIRED has confirmed. Weil was previously an early executive leading product at Instagram.
“Today is my last day at OpenAI, as OpenAI for Science is being decentralized into other research teams,” Weil said in a social media post on Friday, shortly after WIRED reported his departure. “It’s been a mind-expanding two years, from Chief Product Officer to joining the research team and starting OpenAI for Science.”
Weil did not immediately respond to a request for comment from WIRED.
OpenAI is also sunsetting Prism, which the company launched as a web app in January to give scientists a better way to work with AI. The company is folding the roughly 10-person team behind it under OpenAI’s head of Codex, Thibault Sottiaux, and aims to incorporate Prism’s capabilities into its desktop Codex app. An OpenAI spokesperson confirmed the changes and tells WIRED this is part of the company’s effort to unify its business and product strategy. OpenAI has broader ambitions to turn Codex, its AI coding application, into an “everything app.”
Advertisement
Weil, who joined OpenAI in June 2024, announced last September that he would be starting a new initiative inside of the company called OpenAI for Science. Now, OpenAI is dispersing those employees throughout the company’s product, research, and infrastructure teams. An OpenAI spokesperson reiterated the company’s commitment to accelerating scientific discovery and says it’s one of the clearest ways AI can benefit humanity. Earlier on Friday, the company announced a new series of AI models—GPT-Rosalind—built to help life sciences researchers work faster.
OpenAI is trying to refocus the company around a few key areas, such as enterprise offerings and coding, as the company faces increasing pressure from rivals like Anthropic and gears up to file for an IPO later this year. In March, OpenAI’s CEO of AGI deployment, Fidji Simo, told staff that the company needs to simplify its product offerings. The push to divert resources to more consequential efforts resulted in OpenAI discontinuing its Sora video-generation app.
Unrelated to Weil’s news, two other executives announced on Friday that they are departing OpenAI. OpenAI’s chief technology officer of enterprise applications, Srinivas Narayanan, announced internally that he is leaving the company to spend time with his family. Narayanan had joined OpenAI as the company’s VP of engineering. And Bill Peebles, head of Sora, posted on X that he was done at OpenAI as well.
The exits of Weil, Peebles, and Narayanan are just the latest in a series of executive shake-ups at OpenAI. The company recently announced a major reorganization of its executive team as Simo took a medical leave to focus on her health. In the same announcement, OpenAI said cofounder and president Greg Brockman would oversee the company’s products in the interim, and the company’s chief marketing officer, Kate Rouch, would take a leave of absence due to medical issues. Chief operating officer Brad Lightcap transitioned to a “special projects” role as part of the restructuring as well.
Advertisement
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman seemed to acknowledge the various upheavals in a recent blog post. “I am also very aware that OpenAI is now a major platform, not a scrappy startup, and we need to operate in a more predictable way now,” he wrote. “It has been an extremely intense, chaotic, and high-pressure few years.”
PwC research found that Irish companies are somewhat lagging behind their global peers where AI implementation and benefits are concerned.
Professional services companyPwC has released data exploring how organisational leaders are navigating AI gains across a range of areas, such as growth, revenue, investment, workflows, autonomous decisions, reinventing business models and governance, and analysing where the AI leaders are driving results.
PwC collected data for a survey from 1,217 senior executives around the world, including from Ireland, at a director level or above, at companies across 25 sectors and multiple regions worldwide.
From that information, PwC found that nearly three-quarters (74pc) of AI’s economic gains are being utilised by only 20pc of companies. According to the findings, this is indicative of a “stark and widening divide between a small group of AI leaders and the majority of businesses still stuck in pilot mode”.
Advertisement
Commenting on the report, David Lee, the chief technology leader for PwC Ireland, said, “Many companies are busy rolling out AI pilots, but only a minority are converting that activity into measurable financial returns.
“The leaders stand out because they point AI at growth, not just cost reduction, and back that ambition with the foundations that make AI scalable and reliable.”
Is Ireland keeping pace?
Ireland specifically was found to be falling behind its global peers when it comes to AI implementation and benefits.
Lee said: “Based on our previous studies, Irish companies do somewhat lag global peers where AI implementation and benefits are concerned.”
Advertisement
He added that “PwC’s 2026 Irish CEO survey reveals fewer Irish CEOs (8pc) report AI application across a range of business areas compared to global counterparts (18pc), including demand generation, products, services, experiences and strategic direction-setting”.
He noted: “Some of the benefits from AI are also taking longer to come through compared to global peers, with Irish organisations seeing the opportunities from AI, but are not yet grasping the transformative powers.
“17pc of Irish CEOs say that AI has delivered increased revenues in the past 12 months, behind global peers (29pc). Nearly a quarter (23pc) say that AI has delivered cost reductions in the past 12 months, also behind global peers (26pc).”
The companies that are leading were found to be roughly two to three times more likely to use AI to identify and pursue growth opportunities or reinvent their business model. They are also twice as likely to redesign workflows to incorporate AI rather than simply adding new AI tools.
Advertisement
They are nearly three times more likely to have increased the number of decisions made without human intervention and were shown to be going further in relation to AI governance. Within high-performing companies, trust at scalemodels were found to be effective.
The report said, “AI leaders are more likely than other companies to have mechanisms such as a responsible AI framework (1.7 times as likely as other companies) and a cross-functional AI governance board (1.5 times). As a result of their efforts, their employees are twice as likely to trust AI outputs.”
Time for a change
PwC’s report suggested that a failure to shift the current approach to the implementation of artificial intelligence by the majority would likely widen the performance gap between AI leaders and “laggards”, particularly as leading organisations continue to learn, grow, and automate safely and speedily.
Commenting on the results of the research, Martin Duffy, the head of AI and emerging technologies at PwC Ireland, said: “AI return on investment comes down to execution discipline – clear metrics, fast stop-or-scale decisions and designs built for reuse. Value shows up when AI is embedded in everyday workflows, not isolated pilots.”
Advertisement
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
A new Quordle puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Friday’s puzzle instead then click here: Quordle hints and answers for Friday, April 17 (game #1544).
Quordle was one of the original Wordle alternatives and is still going strong now more than 1,400 games later. It offers a genuine challenge, though, so read on if you need some Quordle hints today – or scroll down further for the answers.
Enjoy playing word games? You can also check out my NYT Connections today and NYT Strands today pages for hints and answers for those puzzles, while Marc’s Wordle today column covers the original viral word game.
Advertisement
SPOILER WARNING: Information about Quordle today is below, so don’t read on if you don’t want to know the answers.
Article continues below
Quordle today (game #1545) – hint #1 – Vowels
How many different vowels are in Quordle today?
• The number of different vowels in Quordle today is 5*.
* Note that by vowel we mean the five standard vowels (A, E, I, O, U), not Y (which is sometimes counted as a vowel too).
Advertisement
Quordle today (game #1545) – hint #2 – repeated letters
Do any of today’s Quordle answers contain repeated letters?
• The number of Quordle answers containing a repeated letter today is 2.
Quordle today (game #1545) – hint #3 – uncommon letters
Do the letters Q, Z, X or J appear in Quordle today?
• No. None of Q, Z, X or J appear among today’s Quordle answers.
What letters do today’s Quordle answers start with?
• S
Advertisement
• C
• S
• B
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THEM.
Advertisement
Quordle today (game #1545) – the answers
(Image credit: Merriam-Webster)
The answers to today’s Quordle, game #1545, are…
Advertisement
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
Our first five-vowel game for ages and a particularly tricky one.
Two admissions. Firstly, with a word that began with S and also included the letter P, O and C I could not resist typing in “spock” (thankfully not a word) before guessing SCOOP.
Secondly, I had no idea what a BETEL is and only arrived there after having exhausted every other combination. I have since discovered it’s a plant.
Advertisement
Daily Sequence today (game #1545) – the answers
(Image credit: Merriam-Webster)
The answers to today’s Quordle Daily Sequence, game #1545, are…
Jeff Bezos, the billionaire founder of Amazon and Blue Origin, shows off a mockup of the New Shepard suborbital space capsule during a 2017 conference in Colorado. (GeekWire Photo / Kevin Lisota)
Amazon paid about $1.8 billion last year to Blue Origin, the space company owned by its founder and board chair Jeff Bezos — nearly triple the amount the year before — as the tech giant prepared to ramp up deployment of its own low-Earth orbit satellite constellation.
The increase comes as shareholders weigh a proposal calling for a mandatory independent board chair, citing Bezos’ business interests outside Amazon as potential conflicts of interest.
Bezos stepped down as Amazon’s CEO in 2021 but remains executive chairman.
According to the filing, the company paid approximately $2.2 billion total under satellite launch agreements during the past fiscal year, with an estimated $1.8 billion going to Blue Origin. The prior year’s proxy showed Blue Origin receiving about $578 million out of $1.7 billion total.
Amazon is building a constellation of 3,236 low-Earth orbit satellites under the Amazon Leo program, formerly known as Project Kuiper, to beam broadband internet to consumers and businesses. The company has deployed 243 satellites so far and has asked the FCC for a two-year extension on a July deadline to launch roughly half of the fleet.
Advertisement
The company this week also announced a $10.8 billion deal this week to acquire Globalstar, a satellite operator that has used SpaceX as its primary launch provider.
Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket made its debut flight in January 2025 but has not yet reached the launch cadence needed for the rollout. In addition to Blue Origin, Amazon has launch agreements in place with United Launch Alliance and Arianespace, and has also tapped Blue Origin rival SpaceX’s Falcon 9 for some launches, as Reuters reported this week.
Bezos is also co-founder and co-CEO of AI startup Project Prometheus, a venture focused on applying AI to manufacturing and engineering across a variety of commercial sectors.
The shareholder proposal calling for a mandatory independent chair, submitted by the AFL-CIO Reserve Fund, points to Bezos’ expanding role outside Amazon as cause for concern.
Advertisement
“As a technology company, Project Prometheus could be a potential competitor or a business partner with our Company, raising potential conflicts of interest,” the proposal states, also citing Amazon’s multibillion-dollar launch agreements with Blue Origin as a potential conflict.
It notes that Amazon also has done business with the Bezos-owned Washington Post.
Amazon’s board recommends voting against the proposal, arguing that its lead independent director structure provides sufficient oversight. The role is currently held by Jamie Gorelick, a former U.S. Deputy Attorney General. The company’s annual meeting is set for May 20.
The Blue Origin contracts have drawn scrutiny before. A shareholder lawsuit filed in 2023 alleged Amazon’s board spent less than 40 minutes approving the launch agreements without considering SpaceX as an alternative. Delaware’s Court of Chancery dismissed the case, and the state Supreme Court affirmed that ruling in November 2025.
A new NYT Connections puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Friday’s puzzle instead then click here: NYT Connections hints and answers for Friday, April 17 (game #1041).
Good morning! Let’s play Connections, the NYT’s clever word game that challenges you to group answers in various categories. It can be tough, so read on if you need Connections hints.
What should you do once you’ve finished? Why, play some more word games of course. I’ve also got daily Strands hints and answers and Quordle hints and answers articles if you need help for those too, while Marc’s Wordle today page covers the original viral word game.
Advertisement
SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Connections today is below, so don’t read on if you don’t want to know the answers.
Article continues below
NYT Connections today (game #1042) – today’s words
(Image credit: New York Times)
Today’s NYT Connections words are…
MARVEL
DC
CRUSHWORTHY
POWER
FANTAGRAPHICS
DARK HORSE
VOLTAGE
WONDER
SLEEPER
FRESCADE
STARE
LONG SHOT
PEPSINOGEN
UNDERDOG
GOGGLE
AC
NYT Connections today (game #1042) – hint #1 – group hints
What are some clues for today’s NYT Connections groups?
YELLOW: Gaze at amazing sights
GREEN: Switched on
BLUE: Surprise victor
PURPLE: Begin with a drink
Need more clues?
We’re firmly in spoiler territory now, but read on if you want to know what the four theme answers are for today’s NYT Connections puzzles…
Advertisement
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
NYT Connections today (game #1042) – hint #2 – group answers
What are the answers for today’s NYT Connections groups?
YELLOW: LOOK AT WITH AWE
GREEN: BASIC ELECTRICITY TERMS
BLUE: UNEXPECTED WINNER
PURPLE: STARTING WITH SODA BRANDS
Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO SEE THEM.
Advertisement
NYT Connections today (game #1042) – the answers
(Image credit: New York Times)
The answers to today’s Connections, game #1042, are…
YELLOW: LOOK AT WITH AWE GOGGLE, MARVEL, STARE, WONDER
GREEN: BASIC ELECTRICITY TERMS AC, DC, POWER, VOLTAGE
BLUE: UNEXPECTED WINNER DARK HORSE, LONG SHOT, SLEEPER, UNDERDOG
PURPLE: STARTING WITH SODA BRANDS CRUSHWORTHY, FANTAGRAPHICS, FRESCADE, PEPSINOGEN
My rating: Hard
My score: 1 mistake
Even as I was pressing submit I just knew I was falling into a trap, but couldn’t help linking the comic publishers DC, MARVEL, FANTAGRAPHICS and DARK HORSE.
Down, down I fell, hook, line and sinker, punished for liking comics instead of more highbrow pursuits such as reading the New York Times.
Had I seen the inspired STARTING WITH SODA BRANDS group it would have made up for this crushing failure, but alas it slipped me by — kudos if you saw it.
Moving on, after being tricked I had a slight amount of trepidation about linking AC and DC but here, at least, the obvious assumption was also the correct one.
Advertisement
Yesterday’s NYT Connections answers (Friday, April 17, game #1041)
YELLOW: VEGETABLE PARTS BULB, LEAF, ROOT, STEM
GREEN: PREVAILING COMMON, DOMINANT, GENERAL, POPULAR
BLUE: PARTS OF A PIANO HAMMER, KEY, PEDAL, STRING
PURPLE: SECOND HALVES OF DRINK NAMES SODA, STORMY, TAN, TONIC
What is NYT Connections?
NYT Connections is one of several increasingly popular word games made by the New York Times. It challenges you to find groups of four items that share something in common, and each group has a different difficulty level: green is easy, yellow a little harder, blue often quite tough and purple usually very difficult.
On the plus side, you don’t technically need to solve the final one, as you’ll be able to answer that one by a process of elimination. What’s more, you can make up to four mistakes, which gives you a little bit of breathing room.
It’s a little more involved than something like Wordle, however, and there are plenty of opportunities for the game to trip you up with tricks. For instance, watch out for homophones and other word games that could disguise the answers.
It’s playable for free via the NYT Games site on desktop or mobile.
Grinex, a US-sanctioned cryptocurrency exchange registered in Kyrgyzstan, said it’s halting operations after experiencing a $13 million heist carried out by “western special services” hackers.
Researchers from TRM, which has confirmed the theft, put the value of stolen assets at $15 million after discovering roughly 70 drained addresses, about 16 more than Grinex reported. Neither TRM nor fellow blockchain research firm Elliptic has said how the attackers slipped past Grinex’s defenses. Grinex said it has been under almost constant attack attempts since incorporating 16 months ago. The latest attacks, it said, targeted Russian users of the exchange.
Damaging “Russia’s financial sovereignty”
“The digital footprints and nature of the attack indicate an unprecedented level of resources and technology available exclusively to the structures of unfriendly states,” Grinex said. “According to preliminary data, the attack was coordinated with the aim of causing direct damage to Russia’s financial sovereignty.”
“Due to the attack, the Grinex exchange is forced to suspend operations,” Grinex continued. “All available information has been transferred to law enforcement agencies. An application has been submitted to the location of the infrastructure to initiate a criminal case.”
Advertisement
TRM said that TokenSpot, a second Kyrgyzstan-based exchange, was also breached. Two of the exchange’s addresses sent funds to the same consolidation address used by the affected Grinex-linked wallets. What’s more, both exchanges became inoperable on Wednesday, suggesting they were hit by the same attacker.
TRM said TokenSpot was a front for Grinex, which the US Treasury Department sanctioned last year. The department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control said that Grinex, in turn, was a rebrand of Garantex, an exchange it had sanctioned in 2022. The department said then that Ganantex had “directly facilitated notorious ransomware actors and other cybercriminals by processing over $100 million in transactions linked to illicit activities since 2019.” Last year’s sanctions against Grinex came a few months after TRM said that the exchange was likely a front for Ganantex.
The dual agent AI system autonomously solved Anderson’s conjecture from 2014
Rethlas explores problem-solving strategies like a human mathematician would
Archon transforms potential proofs into projects for the Lean 4 verifier
A research team led by Peking University developed a dual-agent AI system capable of solving advanced mathematical problems while also verifying its own results.
The system resolved a conjecture proposed in 2014 by Dan Anderson, completing the process within 80 hours of runtime.
“Using this framework, we successfully solved an open problem in commutative algebra and automatically formalized the proof with essentially no human intervention,” the researchers wrote in a preprint paper published on arXiv.
Article continues below
Advertisement
How the dual-agent framework actually works
The AI tool applies a reasoning system called Rethlas, which draws from a math theorem search engine named Matlas to explore problem-solving strategies.
When Rethlas produces a potential proof, a second system called Archon uses another search engine called LeanSearch to transform that proof into a project for an interactive theorem prover.
Advertisement
The theorem prover, Lean 4, is also a programming language with a community-maintained library containing hundreds of thousands of theorems and definitions.
The researchers noted that no mathematical judgment was required from the human operator during the problem-solving process.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
The AI system performed mathematical tasks faster than any human, including independently doing work that would normally require collaboration between experts in different fields.
Advertisement
However, the team also found that a mathematician could speed up the process by guiding Archon when needed.
“This work provides a concrete example of how mathematical research can be substantially automated using AI,” the researchers stated.
Mathematical proofs demand complete rigor, yet even expert-written proofs may contain subtle flaws.
Advertisement
Similarly, proofs produced by large language models are prone to hallucination and are far less reliable than formal verification methods.
The Chinese team’s framework bridges the gap between natural language reasoning and formal machine verification, allowing the AI system to both solve problems and verify its own findings.
“Our work illustrates a promising paradigm for mathematical research in which informal and formal reasoning systems operate in tandem to produce verifiable results,” the researchers noted.
The paper has not yet been peer-reviewed by experts, so independent verification is still pending.
Advertisement
Anderson’s conjecture was a relatively obscure problem in commutative algebra, which makes the AI’s achievement noteworthy.
However, this feat is not comparable to solving a millennium prize-level challenge like the Riemann Hypothesis or the P vs NP problem.
Whether this approach scales to more difficult mathematical problems remains to be seen.
That said, for a field that has resisted automation for centuries, this represents a notable milestone.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login