This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of MHVYF either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Jeff Bezos is on the cusp of sealing one of the most eye-watering early-stage fundraisings the artificial intelligence sector has yet produced, with his nascent physical AI laboratory, Project Prometheus, reportedly closing in on a $10bn (£7.9bn) round that would value the venture at $38bn.

The Financial Times, citing people familiar with the matter, reported on Monday that BlackRock and JPMorgan are among the institutional heavyweights that have signed up to the round, though the transaction has yet to be finalised. BlackRock declined to comment. The fundraising, if completed at the mooted terms, would place Prometheus among the most richly valued early-stage AI businesses on the planet, less than six months after it emerged from stealth.

Launched quietly in November 2025 with $6.2bn of initial backing, Prometheus is chasing a very different thesis to the generative AI giants that have dominated the investment cycle since ChatGPT arrived in late 2022. Rather than training ever-larger language models on the internet’s text and imagery, it is building systems that can reason about the physical world itself, materials, tolerances, processes and the immutable laws of physics. The stated target markets are engineering, manufacturing, aerospace, robotics, drug discovery and logistics automation, sectors where large language models have, so far, made only glancing contact.

Running the show on a day-to-day basis is chief executive Vikram Bajaj, a former Google X scientist and co-founder of Foresite Labs. The lab has swelled to more than 120 staff, poached from the likes of OpenAI, xAI, Meta and DeepMind. Bezos, described as one of the initial backers, has been leading the fundraising alongside Bajaj, and, notably, has taken an operational role in the business. It is the first time the Amazon founder has rolled up his sleeves at a technology company since stepping down from the chief executive’s chair at the group he built in 2021.

The timing is striking. Prometheus’s raise is landing only days after Amazon itself committed up to $25bn of fresh investment in Anthropic, securing in return a $100bn cloud-spending pledge from the Claude-maker, a transaction that underlined quite how dramatically the scale of AI infrastructure deals has shifted. A $10bn round for a six-month-old laboratory would, for perspective, exceed the lifetime fundraising of most AI companies in existence.

Why are institutions the size of BlackRock and JPMorgan prepared to write cheques of that magnitude into an unproven venture? The answer lies in the peculiar economics of physical AI. Unlike the vast quantities of cheap, publicly available text and code that power today’s language models, the data needed to teach a machine how steel fatigues, how a drug molecule binds or how a robotic arm should pick a part is proprietary, scarce and devilishly expensive to gather at scale. That scarcity is itself a moat, and accumulating it early may confer a durable advantage on whichever laboratories manage it first.

For Britain’s small and mid-sized manufacturers, aerospace suppliers and life sciences specialists, many of whom already sit on decades of unique operational data, the emergence of a well-capitalised Bezos-backed laboratory is a development worth watching. If Prometheus delivers on its ambitions, the model for applying AI to the industrial economy will not be built on the back of scraped web pages but on partnerships with the firms that actually make, mend and move things.

That, of course, is a sizeable “if”. Prometheus has yet to publicly demonstrate a product, let alone a commercial deployment, and the lab remains firmly in its early phase. Plenty of sceptics will also point out that the broader AI market is wearing increasingly frothy valuations. Peter Fedoročko, chief technology officer at analytics firm GoodData, takes a measured view. “Yes, AI has a bubble, but the technology is real,” he argues. “When dot-com crashed, the internet didn’t disappear, it became infrastructure. The same thing happens here. The dot-com crash took a decade to recover financially, but the internet reshaped everything during that time. It didn’t wipe out jobs; it transformed them. AI follows the same pattern. Once the hype burns off, the real builders get back to work.”

For Bezos, the calculation is simpler. Having built the world’s largest logistics and cloud empire on the back of an earlier technological wave, he is now betting, in person and in size, that the next one will be written not in pixels and prose, but in physics.

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

Project will be formed from three metal steel storage containers

Plans have been submitted for blocks to house monks at a Thai Buddhist temple on the outskirts of Bolton. The Wat Sriratanaram temple and monastery, Moss Lane, Kearsley, was created in 2016 at the former clubhouse of Manor Golf Club.

Recently submitted, retrospective plans published by Bolton council, seek to formalise the erection of ‘temporary monk accommodation, including people visiting from Thailand’.

A design and access statement, published in support of the plans, said: “The proposal will provide temporary overnight accommodation for up to 12 monks at any one time.

“The accommodation has been formed from the conversion of three metal steel storage containers which have been linked together in a u-shape to form basic overnight accommodation for visiting monks including showers and toilets.

“The buildings are situated on a raised plinth with doors and windows cut out of the steel to form openings.”

The supporting documents said the building is single storey formed from metal storage containers with a central communal area.

Five separate sleeping areas and six separate toilets and five shower units are provided in the building.

In 2016, permission was granted to use the golf club as a Buddhist temple with four monks residing at the property on a full time basis.

The plans also included an indoor meditation and ceremony area.

The application states that the development use is consistent with the land being in the green belt.

The supporting statement, produced by Ashall Town Planning said: “The proposal which is to provide basic overnight monk accommodation including people visiting from Thailand, ancillary to the existing Wat Sriratanaram temple is considered to conform with relevant planning policies.

“While an unusual form of development, no material harm is caused to the general surrounding area.”

Bolton council will make a decision on the plans in the coming weeks.

To find all the planning applications, traffic diversions, road layout changes, alcohol licence applications and more in your community, visit the Public Notices Portal.

Rachel Reeves has tightened the squeeze on renewable energy generators, raising the windfall tax on wind and solar producers from 45 per cent to 55 per cent in a move the Chancellor insists will stop the sector “cashing in” on the latest Middle East oil and gas shock.

The increase to the electricity generators levy (EGL), announced on Tuesday, has been timed to land alongside a sweeping set of power market reforms from Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, designed to “break the link” between volatile gas prices and the cost of electricity paid by households and businesses.

For Britain’s small and medium-sized employers, still nursing the scars of the 2022 energy crisis, the stakes could scarcely be higher. Industry figures, however, have been quick to brand the package a “sham”, warning it risks locking consumers and businesses into higher bills for decades and chilling the investment climate for renewables just as ministers are trying to court record capital inflows.

Under the existing system, many wind and solar farms still sell power on the wholesale market while drawing a top-up subsidy through the legacy renewables obligation (RO) scheme. The Treasury’s new design offers a carrot alongside the stick: generators who voluntarily switch to fixed-price contracts for difference (CfDs) will be exempt from the higher levy.

Ministers argue this will decouple renewables revenues from wholesale electricity prices, which are still set by the most expensive marginal plant on the system — almost invariably gas. Under the current merit-order pricing, even when the vast majority of power is coming from wind or solar, all generators are paid the gas-set price whenever a gas plant is called on.

“Hardworking British families and businesses should not bear the brunt of global gas price shocks while electricity generators are making exceptional profits,” Ms Reeves said. She added that moving generators onto CfDs, combined with the 55 per cent levy, would “offer households and businesses stronger protection against future energy shocks”.

But the numbers lay bare why the voluntary switch may prove a hard sell. An RO certificate is currently worth £69.34. An onshore wind farm under the RO receives one certificate per megawatt hour (MWh) generated, on top of the wholesale price. At 5pm on Monday, with wholesale prices at £99 per MWh, that produced a total return of £168.43 per MWh. Offshore wind, which earns up to 1.9 certificates per MWh, could have banked as much as £230.75 per MWh at the same moment.

One senior energy industry source warned that handing such generators fresh 20-year CfDs on top of their existing RO entitlements amounted to a “double subsidy”, and could keep consumer bills elevated well beyond the RO’s planned 2027-to-2037 phase-out.

Dale Vince, the green energy entrepreneur and Labour donor, went further. “The Government are not breaking the link. I’m very disappointed with that,” he said. “Something real has to be done because we’re in the second energy crisis of this decade.”

Kathryn Porter, the independent energy analyst, cautioned that the levy could also hasten the retirement of Britain’s ageing nuclear fleet, which falls within the windfall tax’s scope. “The whole thing is a mess. This entire plan might end up smoothing costs at a higher level than they are now,” she said.

Tara Singh, chief executive of RenewableUK, struck a more diplomatic note, saying the industry supported weakening the gas-electricity link and would “work constructively” with officials. But she warned that investor confidence was on the line. “At a time when ministers are hoping to attract record levels of investment into renewables, uncertainty over changes to taxation needs to be clarified immediately so it does not drive up the cost of investment.”

Ministers also signalled they would tackle the rising sums paid to wind farms to switch off when grid capacity is constrained, a cost ultimately borne by bill-payers, including the nation’s 5.5 million SMEs.

For Mr Miliband, the wider message is a political one. “As we face the second fossil fuel shock in less than five years, the lesson for our country is clear,” he said. “The era of fossil fuel security is over, and the era of clean energy security must come of age.”

The Government will now consult on the detail of the market overhaul. For British business owners watching their energy bills with nervous eyes, the question is no longer whether reform is needed, but whether Ms Reeves and Mr Miliband have hit on the right formula, or merely swapped one distortion for another.

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.