Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

39 Firms Urge EU to Fast-Track DLT Rules, Warn EU Lagging the US

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

A coalition of European financial institutions and industry bodies is urging EU lawmakers to accelerate reform of blockchain rules by treating the DLT Pilot Regime as a standalone law rather than folding it into a broader legislative package. The letter, signed by 39 entities including Nasdaq and Boerse Stuttgart, calls for a quick carve‑out to keep Europe at pace with global developments in tokenized finance. According to Cointelegraph, the missive was addressed to the European Commission and Parliament, highlighting the risk that delaying action could slow Europe’s adoption of distributed ledger technology in financial markets.

The DLT Pilot Regime, launched in 2023, serves as a regulatory sandbox for testing blockchain-based trading and settlement of assets such as stocks and bonds under real-market conditions. It provides temporary exemptions from certain rules to allow firms to experiment with tokenized finance in a controlled environment. The signatories contend that integrating the regime into a wider Market Integration and Supervision Package would push reforms into a protracted negotiations cycle, potentially undermining Europe’s competitiveness as the United States advances its own tokenized-finance initiatives. “Negotiations are likely to be lengthy,” the letter states, adding that delays “risk dampening Europe’s momentum in DLT adoption.”

Key takeaways

  • EU industry groups press for treating the DLT Pilot Regime as a standalone legislative act rather than including it in a broader digital finance package.
  • Proposals call for expanding the regime’s scope, increasing the asset universe, and raising the overall testing cap to 150 billion euros.
  • Efforts include removing time limits on licenses, enabling longer or permanent permission to operate pilot projects.
  • Context is shaped by a U.S. regulatory shift: the SEC has clarified custody rules for tokenized securities and signaled support for tokenization services via a DTCC subsidiary under an no-action posture.
  • The developments bear on Europe’s cross-border capital markets, licensing regimes, and competitiveness relative to the United States and other jurisdictions.

EU regulators and industry: decoupling the DLT Pilot from broader reform

The joint letter contends that a standalone DLT Pilot Regime would yield faster regulatory clarity and more predictable pathways for firms testing blockchain-enabled trading and settlement. With the European Union pursuing a broader digital-finance reform agenda, the authors warn that binding the pilot to the multi‑year negotiation timeline of other measures could slow practical progress on tokenized markets. The signatories emphasize broad industry support for pragmatic adjustments that could accelerate implementation without compromising safety or investor protection. The letter was directed to Financial Services Commissioner Maria Luis Albuquerque, underscoring a sense of urgency among market participants who fear lagging policy momentum.

Scope expansion and licensing: what changes are proposed

Under the current regime, the pilot allows limited testing of certain asset classes and issuance scales. Specifically, it covers relatively small market-test cases, with thresholds such as shares of companies valued under roughly $588 million, bonds with issuances under about $1.17 billion, and investment funds with assets under $588 million. The industry coalition is pushing for a broader menu of eligible assets and a substantial uplift in the testing ceiling to 150 billion euros ($176 billion). Besides widening eligibility, the proponents call for the removal of time limits on licenses, effectively enabling longer or ongoing pilot activity to support scale‑up and learning by doing. They argue these are practical, widely supported adjustments that would foster regulated on‑chain markets across Europe.

US momentum and cross-border regulatory context

The United States has been moving to integrate tokenized securities into the existing financial infrastructure, creating a contrasting backdrop to Europe’s stalled pace. The Securities and Exchange Commission has clarified that broker‑dealers can custody tokenized securities under current investor-protection rules. In another development, the SEC issued a no‑action letter enabling a Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) subsidiary to launch a service that tokenizes real-world assets held in custody. These steps reflect a broader U.S. policy trajectory toward practical, regulated tokenization as part of the mainstream financial system. While these actions are not EU decisions, they influence the regulatory discourse in Europe and shape expectations for how quickly EU rules must adapt to technological and market developments. Cointelegraph has reported on these developments and notes the contrast with Europe’s cautious, negotiations-heavy approach.

Advertisement

Industry calls and the push for a timely fix

Separate but related to the current push, a February letter from a group of nine European tokenization and market-infrastructure firms similarly urged EU policymakers to urgently update the DLT Pilot Regime. The signatories—among them Securitize, 21X, and Boerse Stuttgart Group—warned that strict asset limits, low issuance caps, and time-bound licenses risk constraining the growth of regulated on‑chain markets and could drive liquidity away from Europe toward the United States. This earlier appeal underscores a broader concern that the continent’s financial ecosystem could lose competitive momentum if policy changes are not enacted promptly. The situation is being watched closely by exchanges, custodians, and asset managers seeking regulatory clarity and a scalable path to tokenized capital markets.

These developments sit at the intersection of European harmonization efforts and the need for robust, enforceable frameworks that support institutional adoption. They also touch on MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) and the EU’s broader strategy for digital finance, raising questions about licensing, cross‑border supervision, and alignment with traditional banking and custody infrastructures. As regulators weigh changes, market participants are looking for predictable rules, clear oversight standards, and scalable pilot programs that can translate into real-market activity without compromising investor protection or market integrity.

Cointelegraph’s reporting indicates a broad desire among European incumbents and new entrants to reduce the frictions that typically accompany regulatory pilots when they are embedded in larger reform packages. The outcome will influence how quickly regulated, tokenized products can be tested and, ultimately, how seamlessly Europe integrates tokenized finance into its existing financial system.

What happens next remains contingent on negotiations among EU institutions, member‑state interests, and the regulatory oversight community. A standalone DLT Pilot Regime could accelerate practical outcomes, but it will need to be carefully calibrated to maintain high standards of investor protection and market integrity while enabling prompt, scalable experimentation.

Advertisement

Closing perspective: As EU policymakers consider next steps, observers should monitor how changes to the DLT Pilot Regime align with MiCA timelines, licensing processes, and cross‑border supervision frameworks. The balance between speed, safety, and systemically important oversight will shape Europe’s role in global tokenized markets and determine whether the continent keeps pace with U.S. innovations in digital finance.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Quantum Computing Crypto: Act Now, Coinbase Warns

Published

on

Quantum Computing Crypto: Act Now, Coinbase Warns

A 50 page quantum computing crypto risk assessment published Tuesday by Coinbase’s independent advisory board concludes that while today’s blockchains remain secure, a fault-tolerant quantum computer capable of breaking widely used encryption is increasingly plausible and that preparation must begin now, warning that “waiting for it to be urgent is not a good idea.”

Summary

  • The 50 page paper, authored by an independent board including Stanford cryptographer Dan Boneh, Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, and EigenLayer founder Sreeram Kannan.
  • Replacing today’s signatures with quantum-resistant alternatives could expand blockchain data sizes by up to 38 times, according to one estimate in the report, meaning the transition carries significant engineering costs and performance tradeoffs.
  • Bitcoin wallets that have already revealed their public keys are identified as the most immediately vulnerable category of holdings in any future quantum attack scenario.

Quantum computing crypto risk has its most authoritative industry assessment yet. The Coinbase advisory board, a group of world-class cryptographers and blockchain researchers convened by Coinbase in January 2026, released its first major position paper Tuesday: a 50 page analysis of how future quantum computers could affect blockchain security and what the industry must do before that threat becomes real.

“Waiting for it to be urgent is not a good idea,” the paper states, emphasizing that transitions across blockchains, wallets, and exchanges could take years to execute safely even after all the technical standards are in place.

Advertisement

The board members who authored the paper include Dan Boneh, the director of the Stanford Center for Blockchain Research; Justin Drake of the Ethereum Foundation; Sreeram Kannan, the founder of EigenLayer; Yehuda Lindell, Coinbase’s head of cryptography; and Dahlia Malkhi, an expert in resilient distributed systems. Their institutional breadth gives the paper a credibility that no single-company security assessment would carry.

What the Report Found and What Makes It Credible

The paper’s core conclusion is carefully calibrated: quantum computers today cannot crack the cryptography underpinning Bitcoin, Ethereum, or any major blockchain. Breaking standard encryption would require fault-tolerant quantum machines with vastly more error-corrected qubits than current hardware provides, and achieving that is still considered a major engineering challenge. The report does not predict when that will happen. It argues that the timeline uncertainty itself is the problem.

The threat the paper focuses on most is the harvest now, decrypt later attack: adversaries can collect encrypted blockchain data today and store it, waiting for quantum hardware to mature enough to crack it retroactively. For long-held assets, this is a material risk that begins now rather than when the quantum threat becomes practical. Bitcoin addresses that have already revealed their public keys on-chain are specifically identified as the most immediately exposed category of holdings.

Advertisement

Why the Transition Will Be Harder Than It Sounds

The technical solution to quantum vulnerability already exists: NIST has standardized post-quantum cryptographic algorithms that are mathematically resistant to quantum attacks. The problem is implementation at blockchain scale. Post-quantum digital signatures can be tens to hundreds of times larger than the signatures in use today. One estimate in the Coinbase report suggests that replacing current signatures with quantum-proof alternatives could expand block sizes by up to 38 times.

For a network like Bitcoin, which processes blocks under a strict size limit and where any upgrade requires consensus among a decentralized set of stakeholders with no central authority, a 38-times expansion of signature data is not a parameter adjustment. It is a fundamental architectural change that touches every node, wallet, exchange, and application in the ecosystem. The debate among Bitcoin developers, already underway, reflects exactly this tension between urgency and the cost of change.

What Crypto Networks Are Already Doing

The Coinbase report arrives alongside parallel actions across the ecosystem. Ripple published a four phase XRPL post-quantum roadmap targeting completion by 2028. The Ethereum Foundation has elevated post-quantum security to a top strategic priority with a dedicated research team. Bitcoin developers are actively debating BIP 361, a proposal for a structured migration away from legacy address types that expose public keys.

For the Bitcoin quantum risk assessment specifically, researchers estimate approximately 4.5 million Bitcoin held in early or reused addresses may be exposed to future quantum attacks. The quantum threat debate in Bitcoin has become one of the most contested governance questions in the community, precisely because the solutions require either forcing coin migration or accepting that some portion of the supply may eventually be at risk.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto hacks top $17b in a decade as attackers pivot from code to keys

Published

on

Trader offers 10% bounty after claiming violent $24M crypto robbery

DefiLlama logs 518 crypto hacks and over $17b in losses in 10 years, with attackers shifting from smart contracts to keys, bridges and wallets, as rsETH loses ~$290m.

Summary

  • DefiLlama has logged 518 crypto hacking incidents over the past 10 years, with total losses above $17 billion.
  • A growing share of that damage comes from private key leaks, phishing and credential theft rather than pure smart contract bugs.
  • The latest example is Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge exploit, which drained about 116,500 rsETH worth roughly $290–$293 million — 2026’s largest DeFi hack so far.

Crypto’s security bill over the past decade has quietly climbed past $17 billion, according to DefiLlama data cited by Cointelegraph, with at least 518 documented hacks and exploits hitting exchanges, DeFi protocols, bridges and wallets since 2014. That figure captures everything from early exchange blow‑ups to today’s sophisticated cross‑chain attacks, and it comes even as the overall pace of large on‑chain exploits has slowed from peak‑mania years like 2021–2022.

A decade of $17b in crypto losses

Under the surface, however, the composition of those losses is shifting. Where early DeFi hacks often hinged on smart contract bugs and unchecked flash‑loan logic, recent incidents show attackers increasingly targeting the soft tissue around crypto — private keys, signing infrastructure and user devices — with credential theft, social engineering and SIM‑swap‑style attacks. Security firms told Cointelegraph that they expect 2026 to bring more advanced phishing and AI‑assisted scams capable of tricking even technically savvy users into signing malicious transactions or revealing seed phrases.

Advertisement

Bridge infrastructure has been a particular weak point. DefiLlama’s hacks dashboard shows that bridges account for almost $3 billion of the roughly $11.8 billion it categorises as “total value hacked,” with large single incidents like the Ronin, Wormhole and Multichain exploits setting the tone for cross‑chain risk. The latest addition to that list is Kelp DAO’s rsETH cross‑chain bridge, which was hit on April 18 after an attacker forged a cross‑chain message on a LayerZero‑based link and minted or released 116,500 rsETH to an attacker‑controlled address.

Those tokens — representing “restaked” Ether — were worth about $290–$293 million at the time, or roughly 18% of rsETH’s total supply, and have been called the largest DeFi exploit of 2026 so far by outlets including Bloomberg. The incident forced Kelp DAO to pause the bridge, coordinate emergency responses with exchanges and protocols, and sparked a blame game over LayerZero’s default single‑validator configuration, which critics argue left the system effectively one‑key‑away from catastrophic minting.

Even away from headline‑grabbing exploits, everyday credential compromises continue to rack up damage. DefiLlama data cited by Cointelegraph shows that in the first quarter of 2026 alone, hackers stole about $168.6 million from 34 DeFi protocols, with the largest single hit — a $40 million Step Finance theft — traced back to a private key compromise rather than a pure code bug. That trend suggests DeFi’s smart contract security is slowly hardening, while attackers respond by moving upstream into the tools and human processes that sit between wallets and protocols.

Advertisement

For users and teams, the lesson is brutal but clear: audits and formal verification are necessary, but not sufficient. Hardware keys, multi‑sig schemes, segregated signing devices, strict key‑management policies, and relentless phishing hygiene are now as critical to safeguarding crypto as gas optimisations and bug bounties ever were — because it only takes one compromised credential to turn another line in DefiLlama’s hacks database into a nine‑figure loss.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

US Admiral Touts Bitcoin a Tool For US Power Projection

Published

on

US Admiral Touts Bitcoin a Tool For US Power Projection

A senior US military commander has lauded Bitcoin as a “valuable computer science tool,” arguing its usefulness extends beyond monetary applications and can support US national security interests.

“It is a valuable computer science tool, as a power projection,” Admiral Samuel Paparo said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, adding that Bitcoin’s proof-of-work technology “imposes more cost” on attackers attempting to compromise the network:

“Outside of the economic formulation of it, it has got really important computer science applications for cybersecurity.”

The Senate hearing looked into the strategic posture of US forces in Indo-Pacific, including ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, China’s military expansion and coordination with foreign adversaries, and threats from North Korea.

Admiral Samuel Paparo at the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday. Source: US Senate Committee on Armed Services

Paparo’s remarks echo similar comments from US Space Force member Jason Lowery in December 2023, who said Bitcoin and other proof-of-work blockchains could protect the US in cyberwarfare.

At the time, he said that while Bitcoin is mostly seen as a “monetary system” to secure funds, few know that Bitcoin can be used to secure “all forms of data, messages or command signals.”

Advertisement

“As a result, this misconception underplays the technology’s broad strategic significance for cybersecurity, and consequently, national security.”

Research into Bitcoin’s use as a cybersecurity tool comes as many adversaries — including state-linked actors — have turned to cyberattacks such as phishing, ransomware and distributed denial-of-service to sabotage infrastructure and secure economic advantages.

North Korea’s notorious Lazarus Group is one of the most notable examples of this, having stolen billions of dollars in crypto over the past decade to support its nuclear program.

Paparo’s comments came in response to a question from US Senator Tommy Tuberville, who asked how the US and Congress can lead on Bitcoin competition, noting that China’s top monetary think tank now also views Bitcoin as a strategic asset.

Paparo didn’t address the question directly but added, “Bitcoin is a reality. It is a peer-to-peer zero-trust transfer of value. Anything that supports all instruments of national power for the United States of America is to the good.”

Advertisement

Senators introduce national security-focused Bitcoin bill

The US holds the largest Bitcoin reserves among nation-states and holds the largest share of Bitcoin hashrate. However, it remains reliant on foreign-manufactured mining equipment, an issue that has raised national security concerns related to supply chain risks.

Related: Quantum threat to Bitcoin still years away, says Borderless Capital partner

Last month, US Senators Bill Cassidy and Cynthia Lummis introduced the Mined in America Act to resolve that issue by bringing more Bitcoin mining manufacturing back to the US. 

It also seeks to codify Trump’s executive order establishing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

Advertisement

Magazine: Adam Back says current demand is ‘almost’ enough to send Bitcoin to $1M