Politics
Invest NI caught yet again aiding so-called ‘Israel’
It was just two days ago that we suggested Invest Northern Ireland (Invest NI), Stormont’s business development agency, needs:
…a full review into all current… spending to see if further skeletons lurk in the closet.
That was following revelations in the Belfast Telegraph that showed Invest NI was ploughing public money into a software company helping ICE’s murderous intimidation campaign across the US. Now campaign group Act Now has shamed the corporate welfare body again, by highlighting its role in assisting Cooneen Group.
Act Now spoke to the Belfast Telegraph, who report that the County Tyrone-based company’s subsidiary Cooneen Protection Limited secured from Westminster:
…two Israel export licences for one of the group’s subsidiaries, Cooneen Protection Limited.
Defensive equipment still aids war crimes
That was in 2015. One license permitted the subsidiary to provide “armoured plate, body armour, helmets”. Often, those supplying the illegitimate settler-colony attempt to justify sales of military equipment on the basis that it is for defensive purposes.
This is a meaningless distinction. Defensive equipment enables continued offensive action. Iron Dome interceptors can protect offensive ‘Israeli’ hardware from damage, enabling the terror regime to continue its genocidal violence. Body armour can sadly protect an Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) soldier from death, enabling them to continue raping and murdering their way round Palestine and beyond.
Despite this, Invest NI have continued to pump funds into Cooneen Group. The company has:
…received more than £1,397,000 from Invest NI since 2004.
The Telegraph also report that as recently as September 2025:
…Invest NI sponsored and exhibited with the group at the Defence and Security Equipment International exhibition in London, the world’s largest arms fair, attended by companies that sell weapons to Israel.
Roan Ellis-O’Neill of Act Now emphasised this continued support long after the first export licenses to the Zionist entity were granted:
Invest NI have been using taxpayers’ money to provide specialised financial support to drive overseas trade before and after the UK government granted the Cooneen Group the military export licences in 2015.
Act Now: revelation is “clearest link yet” between Invest NI and ‘Israel’
He suggested that Act Now’s findings show:
…the clearest link yet between publicly funded local companies exporting military goods and Israel.
He continued, regarding Invest NI:
Our research reveals that public money has been provided to the Cooneen Group to expand their overseas trade.
There is a real chance that Invest NI provided specialised support so that the Cooneen Group could build the relationships and networks that must be first established before applying for a military export licence.
Even if the funding was not for the purpose of securing an export licence to Israel, the grant types and the reasons support was offered by Invest NI demonstrate how crucial that funding was to develop trade links with countries such as Israel.
The likelihood is that Invest NI and those running the department of the economy of the years just didn’t care about the ethics of potential involvement in human rights abuses. They were just focused on corporate handouts to potentially profitable firms.
After all, they didn’t care when it came to helping to build F-35 warplanes, or when assisting ICE. Similarly, the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) apparently saw nothing wrong with buying software and body armour from the land thieves of so-called ‘Israel’.
The fact that we now know a company inside the north of Ireland makes body armour, renders the PSNI’s purchase all the more shameful. We’ll say it again and go further – Invest NI, and all public bodies, need to ensure they have an ethics code that prevents this shit happening again. A good start would be to simply have a rule forbidding the funding of anything arms-trade related.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Irish government seemingly hiding US military flights over Ireland
Micheál Martin’s government has failed to disclose 248 flights by US military warplanes over Irish airspace since August 2025. There is a strong chance that many of these aircraft are involved in war crimes committed by the Washington terror regime. The Irish Times says they used “open source software” to track the flights, after official figures showed a major drop-off in the number of passing warplanes to just a couple each month. Previous government figures showed 30 to 50 aircraft per month. The government blamed the discrepancy on “administrative error”.
After the Times notified the government, the latter published corrected figures on Thursday 16 April, which were in line with those provided for earlier periods. However, the revised figures show some revealing trends. There was a large drop-off in military traffic around October 2025, when so-called ‘Israel’ agreed to its fraudulent ‘ceasefire’ in Gaza.
While the illegitimate settler-colony has maintained its genocide, killing over 750 Palestinians since the agreement to stop hostilities was reached, the intensity of bombardment has dropped off. This decrease in mass murder is paralleled by a decline in US military flights over Ireland, suggesting Irish airspace is indeed being used to ferry weapons of genocide to the Zionist land theft project.
US military flights over Ireland likely involved in war crimes against Iran
Similarly, another change in flight numbers matches the launching of the illegal US-‘Israeli’ attack on Iran. The Irish Times says:
The figures show a 56 per cent surge in US military overflights of Ireland last month as the US launched hundreds of strikes on Iran.
The overflight of US warplanes is governed by the Air Navigation (Foreign Military Aircraft) Order 1952. This mandates that all foreign military aircraft must obtain diplomatic clearance to enter Irish airspace. Exemptions can be granted on this basis, provided the plane is unarmed, not carrying weapons, not involved in intelligence gathering and not part of a military operation.
The Irish government takes this on trust from the US government. That is, they trust a government led by a war criminal and pathological liar. However, Micheál Martin’s band of sycophants have found it impossible to conceal the appalling truth. They admitted in October 2025 that they:
…allowed munitions of war – onboard a US military plane authorised by Simon Harris to touch down at Shannon Airport – to travel through Irish territory on their way to Israel.
The Irish Times point out the government breached the no surveillance aircraft rule when it allowed:
…multiple overflights of Poseidon P-8 surveillance and anti-submarine aircraft in early January.
These too were engaged in illegal activity by aiding:
…in the pursuit by the US military of a ship in the North Atlantic which had earlier attempted to collect sanctioned oil from Venezuela.
This was part of Trump’s illegal sanctions against the Central American nation, culminating in the murderous abduction of the country’s president Nicolas Maduro and his wife.
The Air Navigation (Carriage of Munitions of War, Weapons and Dangerous Goods) Orders 1973 and 1989 permit exemptions to allow civil aircraft to carry weapons through Irish airspace, if granted an exemption by the minister for transport. According to Al Jazeera:
In 2024, the Department of Transport approved 1,354 applications for civil aircraft or Irish-registered aircraft to carry military weapons or ammunition through Ireland…
Government maintains absurd pretence that Ireland isn’t aiding US atrocities
Despite the fact that weapons transfer through Ireland has literally been confirmed by the Irish government itself, ministers and the Taoiseach himself are still happy to shamelessly lie about the matter. In the face of the damning new overflights figures, and evidence Shannon is a stop-off point for US warplanes on their way to the main German staging post for the assault on Iran, Martin said:
First of all, Shannon [Airport] is not being used for those purposes and there have been repeated attempts to conflate Shannon with both the war in Gaza – which was absolutely false, and there were false claims – and this is a continuing narrative from certain quarters politically within Ireland, which I think will damage Shannon.
Minister for foreign affairs Helen McEntee similarly insulted the public’s intelligence when she said there is “no reason to believe” weapons of mass murder are being moved through Ireland. She said of the rules prohibiting weapons transfer:
…we have no reason to suggest that they’re not [being adhered to].
Oh yes no reason at all, until you recall that the US, even pre-Trump, were serial liars when it came to their illegal killing sprees abroad. These kind of comments from the government are only likely to further enrage anti-war activists, and prompt more direct action against the criminal use of Shannon airport. Until Martin and co. stop participating in atrocities, long may these acts of resistance continue.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
UK media ignores CNN report exposing online “Rape Academy”
Trigger warning: themes of sexual violence and abuse.
The UK state-corporate press and broadcasters are continuing to ignore a CNN report. The report shows that over 64 million men signed up for an online ‘rape academy.’ In this academy, they learned how to drug and rape wives, girlfriends and other women.
MSM turns the other way
Although the report was published in March 2026, searches confirm that none of the UK ‘mainstream’ media have covered it:
The case of Gisele Pelicot
Singer and activist Annie Lennox pointed out the similarity to the case of Gisèle Pelicot, the French woman whose husband drugged her while a string of men raped her:
View this post on Instagram
The Pelicot case and the sentencing of her rapists received media attention in isolation. However, it appears UK media are uninterested in reporting the widespread phenomenon of millions of men studying how to do what her husband did.
Whyever would the establishment media in country riddled with powerful paedophiles and rapists not be interested in covering the existence of a mass rape ring?
Featured image via CNN
By Skwawkbox
Politics
Facial recognition rollout likely after critics lose legal suit
The UK can now roll out a racist surveillance measure that had been delayed by a legal challenge filed by anti-facial recognition campaigners. The appeal has now been lost. Met commissioner Mark Rowley has once again praised facial recognition measures. He believes that the technology helps to catch criminal, while civil liberties groups are not quite so sure…
Imminent roll out
Rowley said facial recognition technology would:
help us catch more criminals quickly and precisely, saves officer time, and ultimately saves money.
And police minister Sarah Jones, channeling every authoritarian since time began, says only the guilty should be fearful…
I welcome today’s ruling because there can be no true liberty when people live in fear of crime in their communities.
Live facial recognition only locates specifically wanted people — law abiding citizens have nothing to fear.
Jones’ bizarrely inferred that criticism from people challenging the excessive deployment of facial recognition technology was unwarranted, saying:
This technology puts dangerous rapists and murderers behind bars — and I question any group who call that uncivil.
We are rolling out facial recognition across the country with record investment to keep communities safe.
A bit of a reach, minister…
Lost appeal ushers in surveillance state
Two concerned citizens had challenged the roll-out in the courts:
Youth worker Shaun Thompson, and Silkie Carlo, director of campaign group Big Brother Watch, brought the challenge over concerns that facial recognition could be used arbitrarily or in a discriminatory way.
The pair had argued that the use of the van-mounted technology:
breaches the right to privacy outlined in the European Convention of Human Rights.
Judges presiding over the case ruled:
We are not able to accept, on the thin submissions advanced before us, that concerns about discrimination infect the legality of the policy.
The government and police claim that the technology has resulted in few mistakes. However, Thompson said he had been misidentified by facial recognition:
No one should be treated like a criminal due to a computer error, I was compliant with the police, but my bank cards and passport weren’t enough to convince the police the facial recognition tech was wrong.
He likened its reliability to:
stop-and-search on steroids.
For several years now, the Canary has been covering the risks of facial recognition. On 1 November 2025, we shed light on the ways in which AI-integrated facial recognition is inherently racist, noting that the:
UN’s office for human rights, as well as anthropologists and tech experts, have long known that AI systems are inherently racist, either by design or through the biases of their creators — but the police facial recognition systems are going above and beyond in the service of racist discrimination.
Facial technology’s race bias
Examples include the case of the appeal claimant in the latest ruling, Shaun Thompson. The other claimant, civil liberties NGO Big Brother Watch, warned in the same month that cops were feeding passport photos into their AI.
Further evidence of the racialised use of AI facial recognition emerged on 15 September 2025. Police used the technology at Notting Hill Carnival—an annual celebration of black British culture—but not at the fascist-organised Unite the Kingdom event.
British securocrats have gotten their way today. Those of us who care about basic, hard-won freedoms must continue to challenge the UK’s bipartisan authoritarianism wherever we can.
Featured image via Unsplash/ the Canary
By Joe Glenton
Politics
Let us hang on to our turbulent priests
This past weekend has been a good one for peacemakers, but disappointing for those of us who were enjoying the medieval-style spat between the papacy and the secular powers in the person of the American presidency.
Having been told by US president Donald Trump that he was ‘WEAK on crime and terrible on foreign policy’, Pope Leo offered a textbook display of turning the other cheek. He assured reporters on Saturday that his recent comments about the world ‘ravaged by a handful of tyrants’ had not been made in response to Trump’s earlier outpourings, but had been written separately, a fortnight beforehand, ‘well before the president ever commented on myself’. It was ‘not in my interest at all’ to debate the president, he added.
On Sunday, US vice-president JD Vance thanked the Pope for his pacific remarks. ‘While the media narrative’, he tweeted, ‘constantly gins up conflict – and yes, real disagreements have happened and will happen – the reality is often much more complicated. Pope Leo preaches the gospel, as he should, and that will inevitably mean he offers his opinions on the moral issues of the day… He will be in our prayers, and I hope that we’ll be in his.’
This outbreak of amity among the three men – just as Isaiah prophesied, the ‘calf and the young lion and the fatling’ dwelling together again in concord – may be a blessed relief for those who find it a trifle undignified for the Vicar of Christ and the Leader of the Free World to be engaged in a social-media slugging match. However, we should not be too enticed by the desire for seemliness. The clash is stimulating, epitomising the worth of the resurgent presence of Christianity in politics, both for church and state alike.
Of course, no one wants an overbearing church, like the 12th-century papacy, locked in a bloody struggle with secular authorities. We are not calling for heavies to chase after archbishops, or Keir Starmer, like Henry II, to be whipped by monks through the streets of Canterbury in his underclothes for his manifold offences (the prime minister would surely find such a prospect displeasing). But spats like that between Trump and Leo show that the church is contributing to political debate in a way that other actors are not able to manage.
The frequent fury directed towards the church and Christian advocates demonstrates that their messages – even in this apparently post-Christian age – are still able to pique the conscience. Consider the permanent rage directed towards Christians by Humanists UK and the National Secular Society during the assisted-suicide and late-stage-abortion debates. Christian statements about fundamental human dignity and freedom from coercion are met not with reasoned rebuttals and debate but rather hysterical eruptions warning of Christians in public life bringing an ‘ultra-conservative form of religious nationalism’.
The resort to an ad hominem response demonstrates the hollowness of their own position, aware that these Christian contributions to the debate are forcing people to think seriously about the fundamental origins of the right to life. Can they be tied to mere assurances given by governments in human-rights conventions, or do they need a more serious metaphysical foundation?
The Christian contribution to the debate about the merits of the Iran War has been equally important. Even for a doctrinaire supporter of war to bring about regime change in Tehran, it would still have been worthwhile to have listened to Rowan Williams’s warning based on the formal Christian criteria for a just war. Such a war would require, among other things, ‘a clear and immediate need for self-defence’, and ‘a clear definition of what would count as a successful outcome’.
He also cautioned that, ‘The real urgency in Iran is for a new political order that responds to what Iranian people are actually hoping for themselves – not some kind of covert annexation designed to serve geopolitical manoeuvring, not a puppet government, not a military protectorate’. Perhaps the rumblings of politicians against the churches are merely a grudging acknowledgement that they should have thought more carefully about political and military strategy.
However, these quarrels are also invigorating for the church. It is easy for any institution to fall into a comfortable consensus, and the churches are not immune. Their clashes with politicians are a salutary reminder for them to examine and challenge their own ethical pronouncements, which might not always be fully thought through.
One example is in the field of migration. In the US, Catholic cardinals have lined up to complain about the rigorous enforcement of the border by ICE. In the UK, Anglican bishops recently made Nigel Farage the target of their opprobrium after he announced his intention to deport 600,000 migrants over five years. ‘I heard no compassion in what you said for those who are at risk from people traffickers…’, wrote the Bishop of Oxford in an open letter. ‘The British people, as I understand them, want public policies founded on the deeply British and Christian values of compassion and care for those in need.’
The bishop, like the American cardinals and the Pope himself, is quite right to insist on Christian ideas of human dignity and compassion, and to ensure their presence in the debate. However, the stridency of the reply is an unconscious acknowledgement that Farage and like-minded politicians have a point, even in terms of a strand of Christian thought that the churches have so far been reluctant to acknowledge.
Christians owe a duty of compassion – protect the stranger, says scripture – but this compassion is owed as part of a wider matrix of obligation: one must also protect the widow and fatherless at the same time. How does one balance the duty of compassion towards the vulnerable in one’s own society and to those further afield? And what of the biblical injunctions to respect and preserve the laws and customs of one’s own society, and for guests to behave respectfully to their hosts? The engagement between politicians and the church puts questions in the air that it behoves the churches to answer properly.
One does not need to be a medieval fetishist to see that there is a benefit for public life in a creative tension between a confident, politically engaged church, and politicians who, like Trump, are bold enough to say, ‘Tell that to the Pope’. Let us hang on to our turbulent priests.
Bijan Omrani is the author of God is an Englishman: Christianity and the Creation of England.
Politics
Why Iran is not a new ‘forever war’
The post Why Iran is not a new ‘forever war’ appeared first on spiked.
Politics
Trump’s pick to replace Stefanik
DAYS THE BUDGET IS LATE: 21
TRUMP FOR CONSTANTINO: Republican House candidate Anthony Constantino’s campaign to replace Rep. Elise Stefanik is a textbook example of how aligning with the MAGA extended universe pays off.
President Donald Trump today endorsed Constantino, the brash and hard-edged CEO of Sticker Mule, over Assemblymember Robert Smullen.
Trump’s nod for the businessperson is a microcosm of a decade of Republican politics. Smullen has lined up institutional support from the state GOP, county chairs and his fellow elected officials in Albany.
But none of that matters to Trump, who won his own insurgent primary a decade ago by bucking the Republican establishment.
Now the president is backing Constantino, who has assembled his own slate of endorsees far more suited to Trump’s temperament. That includes Rudy Giuliani, who backed Constantino after the candidate, according to his telling, wrote a “beautiful two-page letter” to the former New York City mayor.
Constantino has also enlisted Trump confidant and political operative Roger Stone.
Those ties were not lost on the president when he posted on Truth Social this afternoon. “Anthony is strongly supported by many of the most Highly Respected MAGA Warriors in our Movement, including Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Roger Stone!” he wrote.
Then of course, there’s the large “Vote for Trump” sign Constantino erected atop a building that can be seen from Interstate 90.
That kind of tangible loyalty — which withstood a legal challenge by local Democrats — also played well with the president.
“Anthony has been such a Great Supporter that he actually put up a somewhat ‘controversial’ sign, against strong opposition, in my honor,” Trump posted. “The sign is still there!”
For his part, Smullen — whose support from numerous county chairs doesn’t quite equate to the large pro-Trump signage visible from I-90 — was publicly unconcerned by the president weighing in on the primary.
“A consultant got to the president, somebody who is being paid by my opponent,” he told our Bill Mahoney. “And I think the president’s made a mistake here.”
Still, it’s hard not to view this development as anything but a massive blow for Smullen, running to succeed an ardently pro-MAGA House lawmaker in a district that the president won three times.
The endorsement also highlights the strange position the state GOP finds itself in. The party took the unusual step of backing Smullen in the race amid deep concerns from party leaders over Constantino’s temperament.
New York Republicans are preparing for a future without Stefanik as its leader and top fundraiser with national standing. The North Country House lawmaker was in line to become Trump’s United Nations ambassador, only to have the nod yanked amid a messy selection process to pick her successor. Hard feelings from Stefanik’s team following the scuttled special election to replace her have lingered as a result.
One GOP official chortled at the situation, which also comes after Stefanik bowed out of the race for governor following Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman’s entrance.
“They knifed Elise in the special and then they got crushed by Roger Stone,” said the person, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. “It is just the beginning of Elise’s allies including the president settling the score as Elise is in the midst of her successful book tour!”
For Constantino’s part, the endorsement is another step in what had initially seemed like a long-shot bid.
“I had a great talk with President Trump and am honored to receive his endorsement,” he said in a statement. “He noted every primary candidate he endorses wins so I look forward to winning the general election and making everyone who supported me very proud once I am in Congress.”
FROM CITY HALL
CC YOU IN COURT: A prominent police union filed a federal lawsuit against the Civilian Complaint Review Board today, alleging the oversight body is tarnishing officers’ reputations by releasing unredacted — and unsubstantiated — complaints against cops.
Beginning in October, the suit from the New York City Police Benevolent Association alleges, the CCRB began responding to Freedom of Information Law requests about three types of allegations against officers — sexual misconduct, racial bias and offering false statements — by releasing unredacted complaints that are then subsequently uploaded to a public database. Because CCRB does not redact identifying information, the police union argued, the accused officers’ reputations, safety, and employment prospects are unduly damaged.
“CCRB’s under-the-table collusion with anti-police activists to smear cops with false complaints is not only unfair and unconstitutional — it is a calculated effort to end proactive enforcement and drive cops away from the job,” PBA President Patrick Hendry said.
The PBA argued the complaint board is aware of how damaging the allegations can be to cops. The CCRB publishes a redacted version of the complaints on its own website.
The city’s Law Department declined to comment. And a CCRB spokesperson defended the agency but noted its ability to comment was limited by the suit.
“The CCRB’s investigations are complete, thorough and impartial,” spokesperson Dakota Gardner said in a statement. “The Agency continually reviews all applicable laws and regulations regarding the public release of its records, including disciplinary histories of members of service, to ensure it is fully compliant.” — Joe Anuta
CHARTERING A NEW COURSE?: Mamdani said at an unrelated press conference that his administration is weighing its options regarding the future of former Mayor Eric Adams’ Charter Revision Commission, which convened publicly for the first time Monday.
“We are reviewing all of the options that we have when it comes to this previously set up charter review,” Mamdani said at the press conference in Brooklyn.
Pressed on what those options might entail, the mayor added little clarity aside from noting with a laugh that “more and more are being presented by the day.”
The commission’s meeting focused on procedural steps, including selecting acting chair Gilford Monrose, as reported in today’s Playbook.
Created on Adams’ final day in office, the commission is tasked with crafting ballot proposals, including one to establish an open primary election system. This shift could complicate reelection prospects for Mamdani by opening the Democratic primary electorate up to a larger, more moderate-leaning pool of voters.
Mamdani — who has previously criticized the body as undemocratic — has several avenues to blunt its work. Charter experts say one option for the mayor’s office would be installing a chair who could stall proceedings.
Randy Mastro, the former first deputy mayor under Adams who’s now advising the commission pro bono, told Playbook yesterday he has received no assurances from the Mamdani administration about its plans. A person familiar with the matter said Mastro has also discussed the commission with Mamdani’s corporation counsel, Steve Banks.
Still, Mastro downplayed the influence of any single appointee amid the possibility of a Mamdani-selected chair helming the commission.
“I welcome anyone who wants to participate in a constructive process to improve our local democracy,” Mastro said. — Gelila Negesse
FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL
PRIMARY COLORS: Former state Assemblymember Taylor Darling ended her primary bid against battleground Democratic Rep. Laura Gillen earlier this week.
“Unfortunately, the technicalities of the current system make it challenging for community focused campaigns to fully participate in the Democratic process,” Darling wrote on social media. “While I respect the rules, it is clear that these barriers need to be addressed if we want a system where all voices, especially those from our communities, are heard and valued.”
Any primary challenger is poised to have an uphill climb against the incumbent Gillen, who has more than $3 million on hand. Darling, who entered the race after Gillen voted in support of funding for the Department of Homeland Security, raised just $24,000 last quarter and had $15,000 in the bank. Progressive organizer Kiana Bierria-Anderson is also in the race, though she said her petitions to get on the ballot are being challenged. — Madison Fernandez
IN OTHER NEWS
— WATCHDOG BARKS: Citizens Budget Commission urges lawmakers to limit government spending and hold off on tax hikes as new report shows tens of thousands of New Yorkers are leaving the city. (Gothamist)
— POLLUTERS PAY: Republicans in Congress are aiming to end New York’s climate law that requires fossil fuel companies to pay for weather-related damages. (Newsday)
— THAT STINKS: As state-funded daycare expands in New York, new education mandates regarding potty training and diaper changes for young students have left schools scrambling to create new policies. (New York Post)
Missed this morning’s New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.
Politics
The process is an ass
They say the process is the punishment. It’s certainly felt that way these past few days, as a bemused public have been subjected to an insufferable argument over vetting procedures, waged between prime minister Keir Starmer and former top Foreign Office mandarin Olly Robbins.
Starmer sacked Robbins last week, saying that Robbins’ failure to disclose that Peter Mandelson had failed his security vetting was ‘astonishing’. Robbins, for his part, says Downing Street had made clear that Mandelson should be railroaded into the post of ambassador to the US as soon as possible, niceties be damned. Plus, it wasn’t his place to raise vetting concerns anyway.
We had hours of Starmer squirming in the Commons on Monday – a session in which the word ‘process’ was uttered no less than 128 times. Robbins then spent hours in front of the Foreign Affairs Committee today, during which he claimed he could recite two books by heart: the Civil Service Code and the Book of Common Prayer. Miraculously, all of this has managed to make the Mandelson scandal – centred on a disgraced New Labour fixer and his alleged proximity to Russian oligarchs and globetrotting nonces – boring. The high drama has been ruined by clucking managerialism.
Starmer, long accused of being more civil servant than politician, looked almost in his element yesterday. He might not have any vision, or nose for public opinion, but the former director of public prosecutions clearly loves a bureaucratic bunfight. ‘I have now updated the terms of reference’, he said at one point, about his internal review into vetting. Words that will echo down the ages. You can imagine them carved into the plinth of his statue.
This has all been a tedious lesson in why procedure, though it has its place, is no substitute for politics. Or judgement. You’d be forgiven for thinking the problem with Mandelson’s appointment was the failure of the process, even though the dogs in the street could have told you that Mandelson’s latest flirtation with high office was bound to end in disgrace, as all the others did.
Certainly, to the extent we can say anything definitive about this arcane scandal, it’s that the process is an ass. According to Robbins’ testimony, it was totally right and proper for officials not to tell ministers about the outcomes of security vetting. Given Mandelson was reportedly deemed to be a potential national-security risk, due to his dealings with Russian and Chinese firms and heightened exposure to blackmail, the idea that officials should just keep mum seems absurd. Robbins even said it was ultimately the right decision to give Mandelson clearance to take up his post in DC.
But procedure is also often a cloak for politicians to hide behind – to evade accountability for political decisions. Starmer knew who he was getting into bed with. He had been told as early as 2023, while in opposition, that the spooks were worried about Mandelson’s business activities. He clearly decided the Prince of Darkness’s diplomatic star power would make up for his priced-in dodginess, then looked the other way while the officials made it happen. Even if Starmer had no idea about the vetting issue specifically, that hardly exonerates him from making such a terrible call in the first place.
Politics can be grubby. Bending the rules, and making use of a few questionable characters, is sometimes the cost of doing business. But there is a limit. Plus, Starmer’s double sin is to pretend he doesn’t play this game while also playing it badly. Having no idea what he wants to do, or how to do it, he has deferred to Blairite ghouls like Mandy, whose original service to the nation served only to boost their status on the globalist jetset.
It is delicious that Keir Starmer’s sanctimonious burbling in opposition is now colliding with reality. Far from banishing sleaze, untruths and incompetence from politics, he has been exposed as an inept middle manager who can’t even do the shady stuff right; a man whose last defence is that he had no idea what was going on within his own government. But the answer to this isn’t better processes, but in politicians of judgement and substance. Starmer clearly isn’t one of them.
Tom Slater is editor of spiked. Follow him on X: @Tom_Slater_.
Politics
Israel’s enemies are Britain’s, too
To these enemies, Israel is the ‘Little Satan’, a mere stepping stone in their fight to destroy the ‘Great Satan’, the US and its Western allies. As proclaimed by the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Khomeini, ‘We shall export our revolution to the whole world. Until the cry “There is no god but Allah” resounds over the whole world, there will be struggle.’
In a rational world, this might prompt Western leaders to reflect on their reluctance to stand with Israel in its long-standing conflict with the Islamic Republic. Instead, the UK government and others are busy undermining the one democratic state in the Middle East that shares their values, enemies and interests – all while rolling out the diplomatic equivalent of a welcome mat for regimes that want us dead.
Israel is the West’s front line in the Middle East. Whenever it’s hit, jihadi plots in Europe spike. If Israel falls, the vacuum won’t be filled by states that care about social justice or international law. It will be filled by the very forces that hate our way of life and want to destroy it.
Beyond ideology, the practical reality of British and European security is inextricably linked to Israeli survival. While our politicians posture, our security services are quietly relying on a partnership that keeps British citizens safe. This cooperation involves a vital exchange of high-end intelligence and defensive technology, including Israeli signals intelligence (the interception and analysis of electronic signals, from communications to radar) and other human assets – all which help thwart terror attacks on European soil. Be it drone technology or missile defence, Israeli innovation is woven into the fabric of Western military readiness. When Westminster downgrades this relationship because the optics get difficult, the UK degrades its own defences as a consequence.
I don’t argue this as a detached onlooker, but as someone who sees this collision from both sides. I was born and raised in Israel, but Britain has been my home for 17 years. My children are British. When I work to combat anti-Semitism here, it isn’t just out of tribal loyalty; it is also because the hatred being directed at Jews and the Jewish state is a precursor to a wider assault on the West. I have seen the front line first-hand, and I can tell you, it is moving closer to home.
And yet, British politicians are either totally unable or unwilling to contend with this reality. Westminster seems paralysed by a fear of domestic Islamic voting blocs and a loud, radicalised middle class. We have raised a generation of ‘anti-imperialist’ activists who view their own country as a racist, illegitimate entity that they would refuse to fight for. For members of this young, comfortable class, Israel is the ultimate villain because it represents everything they have been taught to loathe: national pride, borders and a willingness to fight for their own survival.
This weakness is mirrored in our crumbling hard power. Britain’s armed forces are at their smallest since the Napoleonic era. In the absence of the ability to deter threats, we seek instead to placate. We lecture Israel on ‘restraint’ because we no longer have the stomach for the reality of defence. British politicians parrot that ‘Israel has a right to exist’ while at the same time pursuing policies that directly threaten that existence. This has emboldened a growing anti-Zionist chorus in public life, including MPs, Green Party candidates and university lecturers who have moved beyond legitimate criticism of Israeli policies and settler violence to denying Israel’s very right to nationhood. By tolerating this rhetoric, we are legitimising an ideology that views the entire Western order as something to be torn down.
As Israel celebrates 78 years of defiance, Britain needs to make a choice: we can continue to indulge the ‘anti-colonial’ fantasies of our radicalised youth, as well as the Islamist sectarianism that undermines our national security, or we can recognise Israel for what it is: an essential security asset. It is time to stop treating our allies like enemies and our enemies like partners. The survival of the West may well depend on it.
Limor Simhony Philpott is a writer, policy adviser and researcher.
Politics
More EU leaders are turning against Israel
Both Belgium and Hungary have taken steps to distance themselves from Israel, making them the fourth and fifth countries to do so.
Belgium has joined Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia in demanding that the EU end its association with Israel.
Meanwhile, Péter Magyar, the incoming Hungarian Prime Minister, has made it clear that he will:
arrest Netanyahu if he ever comes to Hungary
He also made it clear that Hungary intends to remain a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Better late than never
Already, Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia have all demanded that the EU end its ‘association’ with Israel. As the Canary previously reported:
Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez has said that Spain will demand an end to the EU’s ‘association agreement’ with Israel at tomorrow’s (21 April 2026) meeting of EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg. Spain will be joined by the governments of Ireland and Slovenia. The association agreement gives Israel preferential trade access to the EU as well as setting a framework for political negotiations.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, told a rally in Andalusia that he is calling for the move because:
a government that violates international law or the principles of the EU cannot be its partner.
Then, on 19 April, the Spanish, Irish, and Slovenian foreign ministers wrote to the EU’s senior diplomat Kaja Kallas. They accused Israel of breaching its obligations under international law, including
executive decisions, military decisions and laws adopted by the Knesset, that contravene human rights and violate international law and international humanitarian law.
Ahead of a meeting with EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg, Maxime Prevot, Belgium’s Foreign Minister, said that Israel’s actions in Lebanon are “totally unacceptable“.
He said that Belgium is calling for at least a partial suspension of the EU’s Association Agreement with Israel.
War criminals hiding in plain sight
The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu in November 2024 over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. In principle, ICC member countries are obliged to detain individuals subject to such warrants.
However, some countries have argued they can remain ICC members without enforcing such warrants.
France argued that arresting Netanyahu would contravene other agreements it has with Israel.
Importantly, though, Péter Magyar, incoming Hungarian Prime Minister, told reporters that:
If a country is a member of the ICC and a person who is wanted by the ICC enters our territory, then that person must be taken into custody.
Netanyahu is due to visit Hungary later this year.
Meanwhile, Italy and Germany have defended Israel from EU trade sanctions.
Antonio Tajani, Italy’s foreign minister, said that breaking trade agreements is not a useful tool because then the Israeli population “will be affected.”
Of course, he is ignoring that the vast majority of Israeli citizens support the illegal state’s genocides.
Holding Israel accountable
Eighty-two percent of Jewish Israelis support expelling Palestinians from Gaza. Meanwhile, 56% back the expulsion of Arab citizens of Israel.
Additionally, Tajani is also ignoring the fact that there is a conscription law in Israel. This means that the majority of Israeli citizens must serve in the IOF for a minimum of 24 months for women, or 32 months for men.
Essentially, the majority of Israelis have either directly taken part in the genocide or support it, which means their feelings are irrelevant.
Whilst some EU leaders are finally growing a pair and taking a stand, it seems that some EU countries are still putting trade, money, and the delicate feelings of a majority-genocidal country above the lives of black and brown people in Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran.
But until the rest of Europe starts centring those lives, feelings, and voices, Israel will continue to commit war crimes and get away with it.
Feature image via the Canary
By HG
Politics
Paloma Faith among 1,100 artists urging Eurovision boycott
Paloma Faith, Massive Attack, Paul Weller and Kneecap are among more than 1,100 musicians and cultural workers calling for a boycott of the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 over the inclusion of genocidal Israel.
Boycott Eurovision unless Zionist Israel is banned
The letter, co-ordinated by campaign group No Music For Genocide (NMFG), has also been signed by artists including David Holmes, Brian Eno, Peter Gabriel, and Macklemore.
It calls on countries to follow the lead of Ireland, Iceland, Slovenia, the Netherlands, and Spain by withdrawing from the popular music competition.
NMFG urged public broadcasters, performers, screening party organisers, crew, and fans to refuse to participate in or platform Eurovision until Israel is banned.
The letter says the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which runs the competition, should ban Israel from participating because of the ongoing conflict with Palestine, citing its ban of Russia in 2022 following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
The letter cites Israel’s genocide in Gaza and said Eurovision should not “whitewash and normalise” the actions of the Zionist state. Since October 2023, Israel has killed at least 72,000 people, with the toll from the genocide likely to rise.
The letter called the EBU “hypocritical” for banning Russia from Eurovision but not Israel, and said that those who had signed the letter “refuse to be silent”.
Massive Attack musician Robert Del Naja, who is among those to sign the letter, was arrested earlier this month during a mass protest in central London against the ban on Palestine Action.
‘Silence is complicity’
Irish rap trio Kneecap, who are known for their politically driven music and social commentary, said:
Russia was banned from Eurovision in 2022. Israel has been murdering Palestinians for decades and is now committing genocide – and for the third year running, they’re welcomed back onto the stage.
That’s not neutrality. That’s a choice. We’ve paid a price for speaking out – lost gigs, court cases, visa bans – and we’d do it all again tomorrow.
Silence is complicity. We stand with No Music for Genocide and every artist, fan and broadcaster who refuses to let the world’s biggest music event be used to whitewash genocide. No stage for genocide. Free Palestine.
NMFG organisers said:
Every year, for its entire 53-year tenure as a Eurovision participant, Israel has perpetuated its terrorising systems of apartheid, torture, land theft, and military occupation against Palestinians from the river to the sea with complete impunity.
While many of us in the industry make light of Eurovision or doubt our own power as cultural producers, genocidal Israel’s leaders speak openly about the contest’s geopolitical value.
NMFG stands with and amplifies the incredible grassroots organising efforts across Europe to boycott Eurovision until Israel is banned.
From Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel to direct actionists, from Film Workers For Palestine in Hollywood to striking dockworkers in Italy and Morocco, people of conscience around the globe are fighting complicity in every industry for a free Palestine and a freer world.
Featured image via the Canary
By The Canary
-
News Videos7 days agoSecure crypto trading starts with an FIU-registered
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Theodora Dress
-
Politics4 days agoPalestine barred from entering Canada for FIFA Congress
-
Sports5 days agoNWFL Suspends Two Players Over Post-Match Clash in Ado-Ekiti
-
Entertainment2 days ago
NBA Analyst Charles Barkley Chimes in on Ice Spice McDonald’s Fiasco
-
Business2 days agoPowerball Result April 18, 2026: No Jackpot Winner in Powerball Draw: $75 Million Rolls Over
-
Crypto World4 days agoRussia Pushes Bill to Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Politics1 day agoGary Stevenson delivers timely reminder to register to vote as deadline TODAY
-
Politics3 days agoZack Polanski demands ‘council homes not luxury flats for foreign investors’
-
Tech3 days agoAuto Enthusiast Scores Running Tesla Model 3 for Two Grand and Turns It Into Bare-Bones Go-Kart
-
Business5 days agoCreo Medical agree sale of its manufacturing operation
-
Tech6 days ago‘Avatar: Aang, The Last Airbender’ Leaked Online. Some Fans Say Paramount Deserves the Fallout
-
Crypto World4 days agoRussia Introduces Bill To Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Tech7 days agoMicrosoft adds Windows protections for malicious Remote Desktop files
-
Crypto World7 days agoX Launches New Cashtag Feature for Stocks and Crypto: X
-
Entertainment7 days agoDave Portnoy Slams Dianna Russini: ‘Makes Zero Sense’
-
Sports6 days agoBritish climbers complete new route in Swiss Alps
-
Crypto World3 days agoKelp DAO rsETH Bridge Hack Drains $292M as DeFi Losses Top $600M in Two Weeks
-
Sports7 days agoWTA roundup: All seeded players advance in Stuttgart, Rouen
-
Sports6 days ago“Felt Much Better Today”: Josh Hazlewood Opens Up On His Recovery Win Over LSG


You must be logged in to post a comment Login