Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Invest NI caught yet again aiding so-called ‘Israel’

Published

on

Invest NI

Invest NI

It was just two days ago that we suggested Invest Northern Ireland (Invest NI), Stormont’s business development agency, needs:

…a full review into all current… spending to see if further skeletons lurk in the closet.

That was following revelations in the Belfast Telegraph that showed Invest NI was ploughing public money into a software company helping ICE’s murderous intimidation campaign across the US. Now campaign group Act Now has shamed the corporate welfare body again, by highlighting its role in assisting Cooneen Group.

Act Now spoke to the Belfast Telegraph, who report that the County Tyrone-based company’s subsidiary Cooneen Protection Limited secured from Westminster:

…two Israel export licences for one of the group’s subsidiaries, Cooneen Protection Limited.

Defensive equipment still aids war crimes

That was in 2015. One license permitted the subsidiary to provide “armoured plate, body armour, helmets”. Often, those supplying the illegitimate settler-colony attempt to justify sales of military equipment on the basis that it is for defensive purposes.

Advertisement

This is a meaningless distinction. Defensive equipment enables continued offensive action. Iron Dome interceptors can protect offensive ‘Israeli’ hardware from damage, enabling the terror regime to continue its genocidal violence. Body armour can sadly protect an Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) soldier from death, enabling them to continue raping and murdering their way round Palestine and beyond.

Despite this, Invest NI have continued to pump funds into Cooneen Group. The company has:

…received more than £1,397,000 from Invest NI since 2004.

The Telegraph also report that as recently as September 2025:

…Invest NI sponsored and exhibited with the group at the Defence and Security Equipment International exhibition in London, the world’s largest arms fair, attended by companies that sell weapons to Israel.

Roan Ellis-O’Neill of Act Now emphasised this continued support long after the first export licenses to the Zionist entity were granted:

Advertisement

Invest NI have been using taxpayers’ money to provide specialised financial support to drive overseas trade before and after the UK government granted the Cooneen Group the military export licences in 2015.

Act Now: revelation is “clearest link yet” between Invest NI and ‘Israel’

He suggested that Act Now’s findings show:

…the clearest link yet between publicly funded local companies exporting military goods and Israel.

He continued, regarding Invest NI:

Our research reveals that public money has been provided to the Cooneen Group to expand their overseas trade.

There is a real chance that Invest NI provided specialised support so that the Cooneen Group could build the relationships and networks that must be first established before applying for a military export licence.

Even if the funding was not for the purpose of securing an export licence to Israel, the grant types and the reasons support was offered by Invest NI demonstrate how crucial that funding was to develop trade links with countries such as Israel.

Advertisement

The likelihood is that Invest NI and those running the department of the economy of the years just didn’t care about the ethics of potential involvement in human rights abuses. They were just focused on corporate handouts to potentially profitable firms.

After all, they didn’t care when it came to helping to build F-35 warplanes, or when assisting ICE. Similarly, the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) apparently saw nothing wrong with buying software and body armour from the land thieves of so-called ‘Israel’.

The fact that we now know a company inside the north of Ireland makes body armour, renders the PSNI’s purchase all the more shameful. We’ll say it again and go further – Invest NI, and all public bodies, need to ensure they have an ethics code that prevents this shit happening again. A good start would be to simply have a rule forbidding the funding of anything arms-trade related.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

By Robert Freeman

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

100 Labour MPs urge Starmer to steer party back to the left

Published

on

Labour MPs call for Starmer to move left

Labour MPs call for Starmer to move left

The Tribune Group of more than 100 Labour MPs have called for the prime minister to steer the party back to the left. Meanwhile, 81 MPs have demanded he stand down after Labour came third in the local elections when it comes to national vote share.

Suggested policies

Tribune Labour MPs have said Labour should:

  • Introduce free buses for under 25s and universal credit claimers
  • Raise capital gains tax
  • Proportional property tax instead of stamp duty
  • Reformed council tax
  • Change government’s fiscal constraints to enable more borrowing

These are generally progressive policies, but they lack the overall economic strategy to significantly change the UK.

Also, encouraging bus use is a greener approach to travel. But why support Labour’s current policy of more expensive fares for the majority of those over 25? Labour rose the Tories’ bus fare cap from £2 to £3.

Further, raising capital gains tax towards the rate for income tax is a positive step. Capital gains is passive income and it doesn’t make sense for it to be lower than taxes on people working. Labour did raise it in its October 2024 budget, but it’s still the lowest in the G7.

Advertisement

Onto the next suggestion, a proportional property tax means that households pay a yearly fixed percentage of their home’s ‘value’ in tax. That’s opposed to the current stamp duty, where people pay a percentage of between 2% and 12% when they are buying a house.

A more robust policy would be to stop treating houses as an asset and for the state to provide them at cost price to the taste of the person or household. Then, the person or household re-pays for the cost of building and designing in affordable monthly payments.

Next, there’s council tax. It isn’t related to income, meaning many households pay more despite earning less. Reforming this would be welcome.

On the government’s fiscal rules, public investment is cheaper than private investment for infrastructure. The private sector pays higher interest and would charge the state or people to make profit. More borrowing, failing the use of debt-free fiat currency, is a better longterm solution.

Advertisement

‘Move left’ isn’t much for Labour

Given Labour is basically a corporate party under its current tragectory, the Tribune Group’s call for a move left may not mean much. But there are some worthwhile policies suggested.

Labour so far cut the winter fuel payment for pensioners then U-turned.

The leadership suspended Labour MPs for voting against the two child benefit cap, then U-turned and reinstated the benefit. The party has administered a huge rise in energy bills.

Any move to the left would be welcome after that.

Advertisement

By James Wright

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

First Government Minister Resigns And Calls On Starmer To Quit

Published

on

First Government Minister Resigns And Calls On Starmer To Quit

A government minister has resigned and called on Keir Starmer to set out a timetable for his departure.

Miattah Fahnbulleh was the minister for devolution, faith and communities, and has now added to the growing calls for the prime minister to quit.

She told Starmer: “The public does not believe that you can lead this change – and nor do I.”

More than 80 Labour MPs have now called on the prime minister to step down following the party’s drubbing at the elections in England, Scotland and Wales last week.

Advertisement

The prime minister has insisted he will not “walk away” from his job in No.10, and even claimed at the weekend he wants a decade in power.

However, Fahnbulleh has become the first government minister to officially give Starmer the push.

In a letter to the prime minister shared on social media, she said: “We have not acted with the vision, pace and ambition that our mandate for change demands of us. Nor have we governed as Labour Party clear about our values and strong in our convictions.”

She added: “Our country faces enormous challenges and people are crying out for the scale of change that this requires.

Advertisement

“The public does not believe that you can lead this change – and nor do I.

“Therefore I urge you to do the right thing for the country and the Party and set a timetable for an orderly transition so that a new team can deliver the change we promised the country.”

It comes after several senior cabinet ministers reportedly told Starmer to resign in private.

This morning I sent my letter of resignation to the Prime Minister.

I urge the Prime Minister to do the right thing for the country and the Party and set a timetable for an orderly transition. pic.twitter.com/u5UArjv7uR

Advertisement

— Miatta Fahnbulleh (@Miatsf) May 12, 2026

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Photo Of Starmer On First Day As MP Stuns As It Resurfaces

Published

on

Photo Of Starmer On First Day As MP Stuns As It Resurfaces

A photo posted by Keir Starmer almost exactly 11 years ago has stunned political pundits after it was unearthed this week.

The prime minister’s job is hanging by a thread as more than 80 MPs call for him to quit following Labour’s drubbing at the elections in England, Scotland and Wales last week.

Catherine West, a former foreign office minister, helped to galvanise the campaign to push Starmer out.

She offered to be a “stalking horse” candidate in a leadership challenge to the prime minister, meaning she would stand against him just to tempt other rivals out of the blocks.

Advertisement

While her bid ultimately failed – as did her subsequent attempt at a no confidence letter – she helped get the ball rolling this week by encouraging MPs to publicly announce they had lost faith in Starmer.

Meanwhile, health secretary Wes Streeting is thought to be one of the frontrunners in the next potential leadership race.

He has made his ambitions to be the next prime minister clear over several months and many of his allies in the Commons have already urged Starmer to resign.

So social media users were stunned when they found a photo of Starmer, Streeting and West together on their first day in the Commons after winning their seats in the 2015 general election.

Advertisement

The now-prime minister shared an image of himself with West and Streeting along with the caption: “Taking our seats for the 1st time.”

The image attracted a huge amount of interest – with many noting just how cruel a game politics can clearly be…

this is like actually insane imagine showing them the newspaper from nearly exactly 10 years in the future 😭😭😭 https://t.co/YFoKoyeaZf

— autumn 💟 (@ambiguousdesire) May 11, 2026

Marcus Giunius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus with Julius Caesar in 2015. https://t.co/0P28oDv12c

— Filippo Carrettoni 🇪🇺🇨🇦🇬🇧🇦🇺🇫🇷🇮🇹 (@fillycarre) May 11, 2026

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Hull City Tigers reach the play-off final

Published

on

Hull City AFC players hug one another in celebration on the pitch

Hull City AFC players hug one another in celebration on the pitch

Hull City finished the job at The Den, beating Millwall 2-0 in the second leg to win the tie 2-0 on aggregate and book a place in the championship play-off final.

Mohammed Belloumi opened the scoring midway through the second half and Joe Gelhardt added a second after coming off the bench to seal the victory.

Hull City AFC’s performance

The first leg was a major anticlimax finishing goalless, so the return leg was set for a winner to be decided at Millwall’s ground. Hull made the first breakthrough when Belloumi cut inside and curled a finish into the net.

That goal shifted momentum and Millwall’s plan as they were forced to chase the game. Just fifteen minutes later, Hull scored again with a swift counter that ended with Gelhardt striking low into the net, effectively ending Millwall’s hope.

Advertisement

The goals were the turning points in the game, each goal decisive not because of the quality but also the timings. Two different goals, but executed to perfection. The overall difference was Hull’s ability to land a killer blow whilst Millwall couldn’t find that cutting edge.

Tactical battle

Hull set up to be compact and aimed to be dangerous on the break. They ceded possession at times but organised in midfield to prevent any real danger for their defence.

Millwall tried to press and dominate territory, particularly in the first half, but struggled to make that control count by creating clear cut chances in front of Hull’s goal.

The introduction of the substitutions changed the game. Hull’s bench provided the spark, with Gelhardt’s immediate impact underlining the visitors’ game plan to use pace and power late in the game.

Advertisement

Bottom Line

Hull will now head to Wembley for the play-off final and are one match away from promotion to the Premier League after 16 years.

Their run this season to the play-off final has been notable as they finished sixth in the regular season and have become the first sixth-placed team in seven years to reach the final. A clear indication that form and momentum in May can outweigh league positions.

For Millwall, the season ends with near misses and questions about how to turn home advantage into the results that are needed in knockout scenarios.

Millwall will need to dust themselves off and begin to prepare for the same fight next season, getting to the play-off semi finals is a huge experience for a team that is hoping to reach the echelon of football in the Premier League.

Advertisement

Featured image via Hull Daily Mail

By Faz Ali

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Genocidal Israel drops white phosphorous on Lebanon AGAIN

Published

on

Claims emerge of Israel using white phosphorus in Lebanon

Claims emerge of Israel using white phosphorus in Lebanon

Israel has once again been caught dropping white phosphorus on civilian areas in Southern Lebanon — a blatant war crime — according to local and international human rights monitoring organisations.

Reuters reported on X that:

Plumes of thick smoke were seen rising from southern Lebanon, following a series of Israeli airstrikes.

It’s a shame we’ve reached the stage of journalism where corporate outlets are incapable of stating the facts.

‘Plumes of thick smoke’ are, in fact, white phosphorous — a deadly incendiary weapon.

Advertisement

Dangerous incendiary weapon

As the Canary previously reported, white phosphorus is a highly reactive chemical substance which ignites instantly upon contact with oxygen. It’s incredibly hard to extinguish and sticks to surfaces such as clothing and skin. White phosphorus is extremely harmful to people, no matter the route of exposure. It causes deep and severe burns – often down to the bone, breathing problems, and burning of the eyes and respiratory tract.

The human body can absorb the chemical, causing dysfunction in multiple organs, including the liver, kidneys, and heart.

It burns at more than 800 degrees Celsius — nearly 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit — high enough to melt metal.

Importantly though:

Advertisement

The incendiary effects of white phosphorous can cause death or cruel injuries that result in lifelong suffering.

The use of incendiary weapons in civilian areas is a war crime for exactly this reason. Generations of Lebanese people will now suffer the consequences of Israel’s indiscriminate and illegal attacks.

According to the World Health Organisation:

The use of white phosphorus may violate Protocol III (on the use of incendiary weapons) of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCCW) in one specific instance: if it is used, on purpose, as an incendiary weapon directly against humans in a civilian setting.

More war crimes

There is plenty of evidence of Israel’s unlawful use of white phosphorus as far back as 2009. Since October 7 alone, Israel has carried out over 1,000 illegal white phosphorus strikes in Gaza.

According to the Euro-Med Monitor, in 40 minutes alone, the IDF launched 300 white phosphorus strikes on a packed residential square in the northern Gaza town of Beit Lahia.

Advertisement

Journalists reported other attacks in crowded areas of Gaza City, the Al-Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza, and the Jabalia town and camp in the Strip’s north.

Amnesty International first reported that the Israeli army was using white phosphorus in Lebanon in October 2023.

Human Rights Watch also verified Israel’s use of white phosphorus on two locations along the Israel-Lebanon border and over Gaza City’s port.

By April 2025, Israel had already committed over 1,000 attacks in Southern Lebanon using white phosphorous.

Since then, Israel has continued to launch white phosphorus over civilian areas of Lebanon.

Advertisement

US origins

As the Canary previously investigated, the US Army supplies Israel with white phosphorus-filled projectiles.

The chemical agent can be deployed through artillery shells, bombs, rockets or grenades.

The white phosphorus itself comes from Israel Chemicals Ltd (ICL), which has a chemical manufacturing plant in St. Louis.

The US government contracted ICL to produce white phosphorus for the US Army, for:

Advertisement

a 5-year, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, fixed-price contract at $3,342,150.

ICL has 10 illegal quarries in the occupied West Bank, according to a report by the Israeli Ministry of Interior. Notably, ICL is also operating in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights.

Of course, it is no surprise that a country with a history steeped in colonialism is supplying incendiary weapons to a genocidal terrorist state.

Imagine the global outcry if Iran or Hezbollah were using white phosphorus on Israel? We would never hear the end of it. But because Israel is mainly terrorising Muslims, and the entire world is scared of Israel crying ‘antisemitism’, the world turns the other way.

Can Israel do anything within the bounds of international law?

Advertisement

Feature image via the Canary 

By HG

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What Food And Drink Can I Bring On Board A Flight?

Published

on

What Food And Drink Can I Bring On Board A Flight?

We’ve already heard Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary’s thoughts on the pre-flight pint (though he didn’t share any plans to stop selling booze on his airline).

But what about the food and drink you can bring on board yourself?

I love bringing a Diet Coke (which airline staff reportedly hate pouring mid-flight) and a duty-free sandwich on board if I can. But according to airlines like Jet2, TUI, and Ryanair, refreshments have to follow certain rules.

Here are five that some airlines have said they won’t permit on board:

Advertisement

1) Alcohol above 70%

easyJet said that as long as it’s not open, you can bring booze bought after security on board. But it can’t be 70% ABV or above, and the airline said, it’s “strictly forbidden to drink any alcohol that has not been purchased on board the aircraft”.

Ryanair also bans alcohol of more than 70% ABV on board, as do Jet2 (who allow drinks that “contain more than 24% but not more than 70% alcohol by volume”), British Airways (“Drinks above 70% alcohol volume are not permitted on board our aircraft in either checked baggage or hand baggage”), TUI, and more.

Airlines also routinely ban drinking your own alcohol on board.

Advertisement

2) Hot drinks without a lid

easyJet said that they allow hot drinks on board if they were bought in the airport, if they have a lid on.

Jet 2 and Ryanair have banned bringing outside hot drinks on board altogether.

3) Hot food

Advertisement

Jet2 said that “You can’t bring hot food or hot drinks onboard our planes for safety reasons” on their site.

And as we mentioned above, both they and Ryanair have banned hot drinks from the airport on board too.

4) Stinky cheese and other smelly food

Jet2 says on its site that it won’t allow items that “are fragile or perishable or which may affect the safety, health or comfort of other passengers or crew” on board, adding, “this may include hot or strong-smelling foods and drinks”.

Advertisement

In other words, it might be time to keep that tuna and onion sando at home.

5) More than 100ml of liquid food

easyJet said that though its 100ml limit doesn’t apply to baby food, milk, or sterilised water provided it doesn’t exceed two litres, for the rest, “There’s a 100ml limit for liquid food, like soup or custard. Different countries have different regulations about importing food and drink, so make sure you check the rules for your destination.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘The Greens are lunatic, deranged and evil’

Published

on

‘The Greens are lunatic, deranged and evil’

The post ‘The Greens are lunatic, deranged and evil’ appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Why do TV shows and movies never say “zombie”?

Published

on

Why do TV shows and movies never say “zombie”?

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”9619599e-9e06-4431-a69b-57c837ce7a80″}).render(“6a030ba5e4b0b1a48de9198e”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

This London Eye Ticket Will Save You 68% On A London Family Day Out

Published

on

This London Eye Ticket Will Save You 68% On A London Family Day Out

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

We know what you’re thinking: there’s a long summer ahead of us. Six weeks of school-free fun for the kids, but then there’s you…

Trying to fill the school holidays with enough things to do to stop the whining, but without breaking the bank, can be an award-worthy task.

And while most of it might be filled with activities to do at home, trips to the park, or sending them off to camp or the grandparents’ so they be someone else’s problem for a few days, it’s fun to sprinkle in a few days out into the mix to keep things exciting.

Advertisement

If you’re already planning ahead to the end of term time, our shopping writer has found just the thing for a trip to the capital city.

To help you plan a day out, or multiple days out, even, London Eye is offering tickets to not one, not two, but five London attractions from just £59 per person.

That’s right: you can visit the London Eye, and your choice of Madame Tussauds, SEA LIFE London Aquarium, London Dungeon, Shrek’s Adventure, and Big Bus Hop-on, Hop-off Sightseeing Tour for as little as £12 per attraction.

That’s up to an impressive 68%, or £133, off the cost of buying individual tickets to each experience.

Just think of the hours of fun to be had from plopping your little ones in front of a birds-eye view of London, staring up at a sand tiger shark, or leading them through Shrek’s swamp.

Advertisement

So you don’t have to tire yourselves out in one go, the ticket lasts for up to 90 days, meaning you can make a meal of stretching out attractions throughout the holidays. And, if your plans change, you can reschedule for free.

Don’t worry, though. If five attractions might be stretching them (or you, let’s be real) too thin, that’s okay, too. London Eye also offers multi-attraction tickets for two or more attractions.

This includes a trip on the London Eye and either tickets to SEA LIFE or Madame Tussauds from just £44 for children and £49 for adults.

While it’s not quite so much of a commitment as the five-attraction ticket, you’ll get more value for money by going to several attractions, rather than one or two.

Advertisement

Not to mention that it’s always a fail-safe plan to fall back on when you eventually get tired of planning new activities towards the end of the holidays.

Just remember to book your time slot ahead of your visit to avoid disappointment!

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Zoe Ball Confirms She Won’t Be Hosting Strictly Come Dancing 2026

Published

on

Zoe Ball Confirms She Won't Be Hosting Strictly Come Dancing 2026

Zoe Ball has admitted that she has been working through “the seven stages of grief and rejection” after losing out on the job of presenting Strictly Come Dancing.

Last month, she dropped a major hint that she was through to the last stages of auditions on her podcast Dig It, but confirmed during the latest instalment that she “didn’t get it”.

“But it’s OK!” she insisted. “I have worked through the seven stages of grief and rejection over the last couple of days.

“I didn’t get it, but I tell you what, if who I think has got it, we’re in safe hands and our new hosts are going to be fabulous.”

Advertisement

She added: “I’m so thrilled for them, and hopefully at a later date, we’ll be able to talk about them in more detail. I was so chuffed to even be in the mix.”

On Monday, The Sun reported that Emma Willis – known for hosting reality shows including Big Brother, The Voice, The Circle and Love Is Blind UK – had been chosen as one half of Strictly’s new presenting duo.

HuffPost UK has contacted the BBC for additional comment.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025