AXPONA 2026 didn’t feel like a show. It felt like a controlled demolition of your free time.
More than 750 brands, thousands of products, and three days that were not nearly enough. We had six people on the ground and still missed entire floors, rooms, and systems that probably deserved attention. That is not poor planning. That is scale. At this point, you could make a serious argument that AXPONA needs another two days just to keep it honest.
Two things hit hard the minute you started opening doors.
First, the money. Six figure systems were not rare. They were the baseline in a lot of rooms. In fact, there were more systems pushing past $200,000 than there were setups under $50,000. Let that sink in for a second. And yes, there were systems that were seven figures or damn close to it, because apparently restraint did not get an invite this year. The industry needs to have a conversation with itself because the next generation is not spending that kind of money anytime soon.
Advertisement
Second, despite all that excess, there were still real finds. We came across genuinely impressive gear under $5,000. The kind of products that do not require a second mortgage or a forgiving spouse. They did not dominate the floor, but they mattered, and we made sure to track them down.
2026 is not lacking for ambition. From Europe to Asia to North America, the level of engineering and execution across two channel and personal audio is on another level right now. Whether you are chasing a reference system or a killer headphone rig, the options have never been deeper or more expensive.
ATC EL50 Anniversary Edition
The ATC EL50 Anniversary makes its case quickly. At $99,999, this isn’t a passive tower that needs help. It’s a fully active three-way system where the amplification, crossover, and drivers are designed to work as one. The crossover is handled at line level using a fourth-order Linkwitz-Riley design at 380Hz and 3.5kHz, which gives ATC tighter control over each driver than a traditional passive network. Each driver has its own dedicated Class A/B MOSFET amplification channel, 200 watts for bass, 100 watts for midrange, and 50 watts for the tweeter, all running fanless with convection cooling. ATC also builds its own drivers in-house, which has been central to its design philosophy for decades. On paper, it covers 32Hz to 25kHz (-6dB), with very low distortion, tight pair matching, and enough output to handle large rooms without strain.
What stood out to me was how it behaved in a room that should not have worked. The space was small, and logic says a speaker like this should overload it. It didn’t. The bass was controlled, evenly distributed, and quick. No bloom, no sense of excess. The presentation had real scale and presence without turning aggressive. It felt composed, which is not something I say often about large systems in hotel rooms. Placement flexibility is always relative, but this demo suggests the EL50 is more forgiving than its size would imply.
I don’t usually get worked up over six-figure speakers. Reality tends to intervene. But this one earns the attention. The U.S. pricing will spark arguments, and not all of them will be wrong. Still, if you’ve been telling yourself that everything above $20K is just diminishing returns and marketing fluff, this is the kind of system that quietly ruins that narrative. Fair warning.
Advertisement
Devore Fidelity Orangutang O/Reference
The DeVore Fidelity Orangutan O/Reference didn’t try to win AXPONA the usual way. John DeVore wasn’t chasing spectacle. In a show full of six-figure systems, this room didn’t lean on volume or flash. It just played music with weight, tone, and a sense of control that held up past the first few minutes. That alone separates it from a lot of rooms that impress quickly and then start to fall apart.
It’s a four-piece system with clear roles. The A module handles the main range with a 10-inch paper cone woofer built around an AlNiCo motor, copper Faraday rings, and a bronze phase plug. Above that, a silk dome tweeter and super tweeter are horn loaded in machined bronze for sensitivity and control without pushing the top end. The B module takes care of the low end with an 11-inch aluminum woofer and passive radiator, powered by a 700-watt Class D amplifier with analog controls for crossover, phase, and EQ. The key is integration. The bass section takes its signal from the same amplifier driving the A module, so it follows the same tonal structure instead of acting like a separate system.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
What I heard was consistent from top to bottom. Piano had weight. Voices carried texture without being pushed forward. Nothing felt exaggerated or dissected. It didn’t behave like a microscope. It behaved like a system that understands how music is supposed to move in a room. And here’s where it gets uncomfortable. If you’re sitting there thinking the jump from this to a $500K or $1M system is going to unlock some hidden level of truth, it’s probably not. At that point, you’re not chasing better sound. You’re negotiating with your ego.
Quad ESL 2912X
The QUAD ESL 2912X, shown by MoFi Distribution at AXPONA 2026, does something most electrostatics don’t bother trying. It keeps the clarity and speed intact, but adds just enough weight to make it feel like music instead of a lab demo. At $18,000, it’s a long way from the original QUAD panels in both price and expectation, but the core idea is still there. Strip away the noise and let the signal speak. The difference is that here, it doesn’t leave everything hanging in midair. There’s a sense of physical presence that grounds it without turning it into something it’s not.
They still look like QUAD electrostatics. Tall panels, about 58 inches, no attempt to hide what they are. In the room, they didn’t feel as imposing as that size suggests. The new all-black finish helps keep them visually restrained, and more importantly, they didn’t dominate the space sonically. What I heard was scale. Not from cabinet volume, but from how the speaker projects and organizes sound. There was width, height, and depth, but it never felt forced.
Advertisement
That’s what separates this from a lot of the oversized systems at the show. Bigger cabinets, bigger claims, and a lot of effort spent trying to prove something. The 2912X doesn’t play that game. It delivers presence without pushing, and connection without excess. If you think you need something twice the size and five times the price to get closer to the music, you might want to spend some time in front of these first. It won’t flatter your assumptions, but it might save you a lot of money.
Dynaudio Legend
The Dynaudio Legend felt like one of the more important “real world” debuts at AXPONA 2026. In a show dominated by systems that cost more than most homes, this was one of the few new speakers that landed in a price range people might actually stretch for. Built in Denmark with hand-finished rosewood veneer and Jatoba hardwood accents, the Legend looks far better in person than the photos suggest. Online complaints about the finish miss the point. Up close, the fit and texture are exactly what you expect at this level.
It’s a compact two-way with a 28mm Esotar 3 tweeter and a 15cm MSP mid/bass driver, crossed at 3.5kHz. On paper, the 60Hz low-end spec and 83dB sensitivity don’t scream “room filler,” but that’s not how it played out. In the room, with proper amplification, I heard real bass presence. Not subwoofer territory, but far from the “nothing below 70Hz” takes floating around online. The midrange leans slightly warm but stays controlled, with vocals and instruments carrying proper weight. Up top, the Esotar 3 does what it always does. Open, extended, detailed, and clean without turning sharp. The overall presentation had more scale than I expected from a speaker this size, with a soundstage that pushed well beyond the cabinets.
Driven by a MOON by Simaudio network amplifier, the pairing made sense. These need current, and they reward it. For smaller rooms, offices, or a serious nearfield setup, this is one of the more complete packages I heard. If we’re talking about the “best” new affordable loudspeaker at the show, this is right there alongside Paradigm’s latest. And for the forum crowd losing their minds over the price, what exactly were you expecting, $2,500? That ship sailed a long time ago. These are the speakers I’m most likely to buy in 2026. That should tell you everything.
Western Acoustics Type 2.1
The Western Acoustics Type 2.1 didn’t look like a typical hi-fi play, and that was the point. New brand, simple Baltic birch cabinet, plywood stand, maple horn up front. Nothing about it screamed for attention. At $6,000 per pair, it sat in a system that wasn’t exactly modest either, anchored by an Accuphase integrated, a Technics turntable with a Dynavector moving coil, and a Nagra phono stage. It would have been easy for the speakers to get lost in that chain. They didn’t.
What I heard was unforced. No hype, no exaggerated bass, no artificial width. Just a stable, well-organized presentation that held together when things got busy. The combination of the Purifi PTT6.5X04 woofer and the FaitalPRO compression driver on a wide 110° waveguide explained a lot of that. Imaging was solid beyond a single seat, and the tonal balance stayed consistent as you moved around. The spec sheet lines up with what I heard. Real low-end reach into the high 30s, enough output to scale without strain, and a 4-ohm load that makes it clear these want proper amplification.
Advertisement
They’re also honest about placement. Rear-ported means you give them some room or you deal with it. Six inches or more off the back wall on a credenza would be a good starting point. These aren’t lifestyle speakers trying to fake credibility. They’re also not trying to be traditional hi-fi jewelry. This feels like a brand figuring out its identity in real time, and starting from the right place. If this is the baseline, Western Acoustics is worth keeping an eye on.
Amphion Argon7LX
The Amphion Argon7LX doesn’t try to win you over with drama. It’s a straightforward design on paper. Two-way, dual 6.5-inch aluminum woofers, a 1-inch titanium tweeter, and a passive radiator handling the low end. What Amphion Loudspeakers brings is execution. Clean, controlled, and consistent. With expanded U.S. distribution through Playback Distribution, these aren’t a niche import anymore, and that matters.
In the room, the presentation leaned toward precision rather than spectacle. Imaging was stable, placement stayed locked in, and nothing shifted when the material got dense. The bass was controlled, but more importantly, it connected properly with the midrange and top end. That sense of cohesion is what stood out. It didn’t feel like drivers handing things off to each other. It felt like a single system doing its job without drawing attention to itself.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
On the practical side, it’s a 4-ohm load with 91dB sensitivity, so it’s not difficult to drive, but it benefits from an amplifier with real current. Amphion’s 50 to 300 watt recommendation feels realistic. The rated 28Hz to 55kHz extension is more than enough for full-range listening in most rooms without a sub. No tricks here. Just a speaker that focuses on getting the fundamentals right. If you’re looking for fireworks, look elsewhere. If you want something that stays composed and gets out of the way, this is exactly that.
Advertisement
Michell Audio Gyro
The Michell Gyro has always been one of the more recognizable designs in analog. This new version doesn’t mess with that identity, but underneath, almost everything has been reworked. The acrylic base is gone, replaced by a solid aluminium slab, and the main chassis moves to a precision-machined 19mm aluminium tooling plate. It’s stiffer, better damped, and clearly aimed at reducing resonance. Brass weights are embedded for balance and vibration control, foam inserts manage reflections around the tonearm mount, and the whole structure sits on Sorbothane isolation feet. The motor remains freestanding, connected only by the belt, with both the motor and PSU housed in machined aluminium enclosures to limit interference. Add in the inverted bearing with improved lubrication, re-tuned suspension, and updated tonearm coupling, and it’s clear Michell didn’t just tweak this. They rebuilt it.
Visually, it still looks like a Gyro, but more substantial. More serious. From an industrial design standpoint, it’s hard to argue with. It was the anchor of the Opera/Unison Research system at the show and did exactly what it needed to do. Stable, quiet, and controlled, without drawing attention to itself. That’s the job. It let the rest of the system speak.
The bigger conversation is price. At $8,999 without a tonearm and $10,998 with the TA2, cartridge extra, this is a very different proposition than older Gyros. Michell is clearly aiming at the same buyers looking at VPI Industries, Clearaudio, Thorens, and Kuzma. Whether it earns that spot comes down to performance, and that’s not something a show floor can fully answer. It looks the part. It’s built like it belongs. But at this price, it has to prove it over time.
Opera Callas Diva Edizione Speciale
The Opera Callas Diva Special Edition leans into what Italian brands tend to do well. Materials, finish, and a clear voicing philosophy that favors tone and texture over clinical precision. At $13,999, this is a substantial, reflex-loaded floorstander with a rear-firing dipole element. Built with hand-crafted wood cabinetry and leather-clad baffles, it feels more like something out of an atelier than a factory. Distributed in the U.S. by Fidelity Imports, it’s also physically serious at 65 kg per speaker. Plan accordingly. This is not a solo lift unless you enjoy bad decisions.
The design combines a forward-facing array with a rear dipole tweeter system. Up front, there’s an 8-inch long-throw woofer, a 7-inch midrange with a polypropylene cone and phase plug, and a 1-inch Scan-Speak 9700 tweeter run without ferrofluid and using a double decompression chamber. Around back, dual 1-inch tweeters add ambient high-frequency energy. The crossover uses 12 dB per octave slopes at roughly 200 Hz and 2 kHz, which points to a focus on phase coherence rather than aggressive filtering. On paper, it runs 30 Hz to 25 kHz with 90 dB sensitivity and a 4-ohm load, so it’s reasonably friendly but still wants an amplifier with some stability and current.
In the room, the presentation followed that philosophy. Not neutral in the strict sense, but balanced in a way that emphasizes flow and texture. The rear array added space without turning things diffuse, and the timing stayed intact. It didn’t shout to get your attention, which is the whole point. If you’re looking for something analytical, this isn’t it. If you want a speaker that leans into musicality without losing control, it makes a strong case.
Advertisement
Focal Mu-so Hekla
The Focal Mu‑so Hekla doesn’t pretend to be a soundbar, even if it lives in the same spot. At $3,600, it’s a single-box system built around Naim Audio’s Pulse platform, with Focal’s ADAPT room correction handling setup. Inside is a 15-driver array firing forward, sideways, and upward, designed to handle both stereo and Dolby Atmos without relying on external speakers. Setup is simple. No sweeps, no tones. You enter room dimensions in the app, and the system adjusts from there.
In use, it works. Atmos material has real width and height, and it doesn’t collapse into a front-heavy presentation. There’s enough spatial information that you start second-guessing where the sound is coming from. Bass extension is stronger than expected for the size, reaching into the low 30 Hz range, and it stays controlled. The overall presentation is composed. Effects move when they should, not because the system is trying to show off. Imaging holds together, and nothing drifts out of place.
Build quality is in line with the price. Brushed and bead-blasted aluminum, solid fit and finish, nothing flashy for the sake of it. It replaces a rack of gear, but the intent is performance, not convenience. It’s not cheap, and it doesn’t try to be. But it delivers in a way most soundbars don’t, which is probably the bigger point.
Advance Paris A-i190
The Advance Paris NOVA A-i190 gets the balance right between design and function. Metal, glass, and VU meters that feel intentional and for the type of listener who favors a vintage look. The optional rotary remote is overbuilt in the best way. Heavy, solid, and clearly designed to last.
Inside, it’s a hybrid design with an ECC81 tube stage feeding a Class A/B output section. The ESS9017 DAC runs in Quad mode, backed by a 4-channel DSP handling EQ and up to dual subwoofer integration with proper crossover control. Connectivity is complete. HDMI eARC, USB with DSD, multiple digital inputs, five RCA inputs, MM phono, pre-outs, and dual sub outputs. Add the optional A-NTC streaming or A-BTC Bluetooth modules and you get full network audio or bi-directional wireless without adding boxes.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
In the room, it sounded composed. Slight warmth through the midrange, open top end, and controlled low end with real weight. More importantly, it never felt pushed. There’s enough headroom here to run a serious system without stress.
Ruark Audio Talisman R
The Ruark Audio Talisman R was one of the more surprising debuts at AXPONA 2026. It’s Ruark’s first floorstander in about 20 years, and if pricing holds under $2,000 when it lands in the U.S. through Fidelity Imports, it’s going to get a lot of attention. At roughly 85 cm tall (about 33.5 inches), it’s compact for a floorstander, and details were limited. No full driver breakdown yet, with more expected when it shows in Vienna. It didn’t feel like a prototype, though. Fit, finish, and overall presentation looked ready.
In the room, driven by the Ruark R610, it came across bold, crisp, and articulate. The soundstage was wider than expected, especially with electronic material, and it held together well. This isn’t a laid-back tuning. It has some energy, and it benefits from proper amplification. Pair it with something in the $1,000 to $2,500 range with decent current and you’ll be in the right zone.
I wanted a pair within a few minutes, which usually tells me enough. Some of the older crowd didn’t love the music choice. That’s their problem. Ruark isn’t playing it safe here, and that’s a good thing. If this is where they’re heading, they’re back in the conversation. Just don’t expect them to wait politely for permission.
The Metaxas & Sins Tourbillon T‑RX MK.II is not subtle. At $52,000, it doesn’t try to be. This is an evolution of the original Tourbillon, with a redesigned output stage derived from the flagship Papillon studio deck and upgraded silver capacitors in both the output and EQ sections. Distributed by Reel Sound Distribution, it sits firmly in the “no compromises” corner of analog sources. The build reflects that. Dense, over-engineered, and visually unlike anything else at the show or anywhere this side of Coruscant.
I’ve spent time with the earlier version at Jeff Garshon’s place, so this wasn’t my first exposure. Jeff may look like he just discovered tape last week, but he’s been deep into this for decades. That system, running through Metaxas amplification and MartinLogan electrostatics, made a strong case for what high-end reel-to-reel can do when everything is aligned. The MK.II builds on that. It’s still built like a tank, still unapologetically mechanical, and still one of the most convincing analog sources I’ve heard.
Advertisement
The room at AXPONA reflected that interest. Tape fans were stacked at the front like it was an open house at Willy Wonka’s factory, minus the chaos. And honestly, it makes sense. This isn’t just about playback. It’s about presence. Compared to something like the Innuos Nazaré, which is a very well-engineered digital box, the Tourbillon T‑RX MK.II is something you interact with. You don’t just listen to it. You end up staring at it.
At AXPONA, it was paired with the Metaxas Emperor Omni, a full-range electrostatic design that looks as unconventional as the deck itself and carries a $159,000 price tag. The pairing made the intent clear. This is a system built to push analog playback to its limits, both in presentation and execution.
REL S/550
REL’s subwoofer demo was one of the more interesting rooms at AXPONA, and not for the usual reasons. Most sub demos chase impact. More slam, more pressure, more low-end theatrics. REL went in a different direction. Their focus was height. Not treble. Not volume. The vertical scale of the presentation and how much space the music occupies in the room.
The system didn’t exactly ease you into it. Wilson Audio WATT/Puppy speakers, a Dan D’Agostino Momentum MxV Integrated Amplifier, and a WADAX Studio Player put the room well past $200K before adding subs. REL added six REL S/550 units, about $20K more, stacked three per side.
REL kept the demo simple. Subs on, subs off. With the subs off, the soundstage didn’t just lose bass. It shrank. The presentation flattened and lost height. Turn them back on and the room opened up again. Vocals stood taller. Instruments had more air above them. It sounded bigger, not louder.
Advertisement
The room wasn’t large, which made the setup more surprising. Six subs in that space should have been too much. It wasn’t. The S/550s blended cleanly with the speakers and never drew attention to themselves. No bloat, no excess, no sense they were taking over.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Improving a system at this level is not easy. In this case, REL didn’t change the character. They extended it. And once you hear what happens when the subs go off, it’s hard to ignore.
VPE Elevon
The VPE Elevon is the first active speaker from VPE Electrodynamics, a brand I’ve mostly associated with subwoofers. At $15,000 per pair, the slim floorstander didn’t stand out visually in a crowded show, but the engineering behind it is worth noting. It’s a three-way collaboration between VPE, SpeakerPower, and Orchard Audio.
Each speaker has 1,000 watts of built-in amplification. The driver layout uses a 7.5-inch SB Acoustics Satori coaxial driver and a 9.5-inch Satori woofer that fires downward through a front slot. The cabinet can also be configured as a dipole with removable side panels, but I didn’t hear that version.
Advertisement
In the room, the presentation was consistent and controlled. Anette Askvik’s “Liberty” can expose issues with balance and detail. The Elevon kept the vocal centered, with good separation and stable imaging. Low-level detail was there without being pushed forward.
These also managed to disappear in the room, which isn’t easily done. The soundstage extended beyond the cabinets with reasonable depth and width, and nothing felt exaggerated or disconnected. It’s a straightforward execution. The Elevon doesn’t lean on a specific sonic signature. It focuses on control, balance, and integration, and that came through in this setup.
Legacy Audio Talos
The Legacy Audio Talos ($65K-$75K/pair ) doesn’t try to hide what it is. My first impression was simple. Big, yet the Valor are even bigger. At nearly 4.5 feet tall and close to 250 pounds each, Talos are not speakers you casually reposition. The cabinets are well finished and the design is clean, but the scale dominates the room.
The driver array reflects that approach. Dual 12-inch woofers, dual AMT tweeters, a coaxially mounted 3-inch midrange, and dual 12-inch passive radiators, which are all powered by 3,000 watts of Class D amplification.
On paper, it reads like brute force. In the room, it didn’t come across that way.
Advertisement
Listening, the presentation was controlled and balanced rather than aggressive. The internal DSP, built around a 56-bit processor with a two-stage room correction process, is clearly doing a lot of the work. Instead of pushing the room, the system seemed to adapt to it.
What stood out most to me was imaging. There was a clear sense of height, width, and depth, and it didn’t feel tied to the cabinets. At times, it was hard to pin the sound to the speakers themselves, which is not what I expected walking in. The Talos is physically imposing and technically complex, but the result isn’t overwhelming. It’s measured, controlled, tonally accurate, and focused on placing everything where it should be in the space.
Acora Acoustics MRC 5.2D
The Acora Acoustics MRC 5.2D caught my attention for a simple reason. It didn’t look like everything else. After walking through room after room at AXPONA, you start to notice how many speakers rely on the same formula. MDF cabinets, wood veneer, some variation of black or walnut. It works, but it all starts to blend together. A few brands tried to shake that up with painted finishes and custom artwork. That might land with a younger crowd, but it’s not for me.
Acora goes in the opposite direction. Stone. Granite and marble cabinets, machined and polished into something that looks more like sculpture than typical hi-fi gear. Every pair is cut from natural material, so no two are exactly the same. Even sitting idle, they draw attention. And they sound as gorgeous as they look!
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
What stood out to me is that the design isn’t just visual. Working with stone at this level is not trivial, and it shows in the execution. The cabinets feel solid and inert, which translates into a clean and controlled presentation in the room. No obvious cabinet coloration, no added resonance.
Even at $58,000 per pair the MRC 5.2D sit near the less expensive end of the Acora line which stretches up to $318,000 per pair for their flagship VRC in granite. Having heard both at different shows over the years, the MRC 5.2D gets dangerously close to the VRC’s flagship level performance, which actually makes them seem more accessible than expected.
Prodigio Audio WR2
The Prodigio Audio (formerly Popori Acoustics) room stood out because the large Hungarian electrostatic/ribbon speakers (model WR2, $35K/pair) were paired with one of the more interesting technologies at the show. The pyramid placed between the roughly 5-foot-tall speakers housed the BACCH 3D system, and it fundamentally changed how the system presented sound.
This is very much a one-seat experience. Even sitting just off center, the effect drops off quickly. In the sweet spot, though, it’s unlike anything else I heard at the show. Sounds didn’t just extend beyond the speakers, they moved around the room in a way that felt deliberate and trackable. At one point, I heard a sound begin behind me to the left and travel forward across the room to the right. That’s not typical stereo imaging.
The BACCH 3D system is doing the heavy lifting here, creating a level of spatial control that goes well beyond traditional two-channel playback. Calling it a new dimension isn’t far off, but it’s also highly dependent on positioning and setup.
Advertisement
Without BACCH 3D engaged, the speakers stood on their own as a strong electrostatic design. I heard good bass extension for the type, along with clean mids and treble. There’s enough here for those who want a more conventional listening experience, but the real story is what happens when the BACCH system is in play.
In a home theater context, this kind of spatial manipulation could open up some interesting possibilities, assuming the setup and seating are dialed in correctly.
Noble Kronos IEM
The Noble Audio Kronos took Best in Show for wired in-ears, and it wasn’t hard to see why. It combines design and engineering in a way that stands out even at a show like AXPONA.
The design starts with the titanium Damascus faceplates. They look striking, but they’re also difficult to execute. Working with titanium is already challenging, and applying a Damascus-style process adds another layer of complexity. It’s not just for show. It reflects a level of craftsmanship that most brands don’t attempt. The inner shells are also milled from titanium, which keeps the structure rigid without adding unnecessary weight.
Inside, the layout is just as ambitious. Each earpiece uses a multi-driver configuration that includes dynamic drivers for bass and sub-bass, balanced armatures for mids and highs, electrostatic drivers for the upper frequencies, and a bone conduction driver for added resonance. Getting that many driver types to work together in a small enclosure is not trivial, and the crossover design has to do a lot of work to keep things coherent.
Advertisement
What I heard was a detailed and controlled presentation that didn’t fall apart under that complexity. There’s a reason John Moulton has the “Wizard” nickname. The Kronos doesn’t rely on one aspect to stand out. It’s the combination of execution, materials, and tuning that makes it work.
T10 Bespoke
The Ear Micro Bespoke T10 will strike some people as expensive audio jewelry. I get that reaction, but it misses the point. What I heard and saw felt more like an early version of where wearable audio is going.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Bear Clark calls them ear-computers, not earphones, and that framing makes more sense once you understand the intent. The T10 isn’t just about playback. It’s built around a sensor suite and input methods that go beyond taps on a shell. The idea is subtle, low-visibility control. Small physical cues, like jaw or head movement, can be used to interact with the system. Some of the functionality is still in development, but the direction is clear.
In practice, that opens up use cases that current in-ears don’t address well. Discreet notifications, the ability to check or respond without pulling out a phone, or triggering actions without obvious gestures. There are also broader safety and accessibility angles. Quiet ways to signal for help or control connected devices without drawing attention. None of this is fully realized yet, but the foundation is there.
Advertisement
That’s why it stood out to me for innovation. The ceiling is defined more by software and ecosystem than by the hardware itself. As wearable tech continues to move toward connected, body-area systems, devices like this start to make more sense as part of that network.
It also works as an in-ear. The sound quality was solid, and the ability to tailor tuning to the user adds practical value beyond the concept. The design leans premium, and the price will limit the audience, but this feels less like a finished product and more like a preview of what could be standard down the line.
Jones & Ceretta Troubadour
Andrew Jones has a long and storied history of loudspeaker design. From a pair of bookshelf speakers at Pioneer that sold for $129.99/pair to the flagship TAD tower speakers, the Reference One at $80,000/pair, Jones’ designs have run the gamut of price ranges and form factors, but all have offered exceptional sound quality. At Axpona, Jones announced his latest project – the Troubadour ($33,900/pair) – a floorstander with impressive dynamic range and extended frequency response. He also launched a new company, Jones and Cerutta, to make and sell the speakers.
The Troubadour uses an innovative concentric field coil driver architecture and a unique cabinet configuration which leads to precise imaging, extended bass and high sensitivity (95 dB @1W/1m)). As we have seen in Jones’ work at both KEF and ELAC, the designer favors concentric (coaxial) two-way drivers for midrange and treble for their time alignment, which allows the two speaker drivers to act as a single point source, thereby improving imaging. And by using an innovative powered field coil design, instead of a permanent magnet, the speaker is able to reach higher magnetic flux densities, reducing hysteresis of the driver which then leads to lower distortion as well as extremely high efficiency. You can power these bad boys with a single-ended tube amp, if that’s your cup of tea.
Jones explained the tech and demonstrated the new speakers to endless standing room only crowds at Axpona. The Troubadours offered precise imaging with a wide and deep soundstage, with exceptional dynamic range. And while they sell for nearly $34,000, they offer meticulous fit and finish and come with a free pair of floorstands to aim the drivers at the usual listening position. If there is a “rock star” among speaker designers, Andrew Jones is that guy, and the Troubadour will likely be a successful addition to his rich portfolio, built over 40+ years in the business.
Advertisement
Aretai Contra 200F
High-end speakers that look like plain black boxes sort of miss the point. If you’re going to charge upwards of $30,000/pair for speakers, you had better make sure they sound great, and look as good as they sound. Latvian speaker maker, Aretai, clearly understood the assignment as their Contra 200F tower speaker unites elegant cabinet design with impeccable sound.
Featuring a three-way design and a tweeter waveguide that looks like a horn instrument, the Aretei throws a realistic soundstage and can reach all the way down to about 25 Hz. It’s also highly efficient at 96 dB (@1W/1m) allowing it to be driven by virtually any high quality amplifier, tube or solid state. We got to see (and hear) the Aretai 200F with both its white gloss tweeter module and a wood-veneered tweeter, which was unveiled at Axpona.
Aretai’s new US distributor DreamScapes A/V paired the Aretai speakers with US-based amplifier maker Benchmark. At the show, the Aretai Contra 200F loudspeakers were driven by two Benchmark AHB2 power amplifiers, paired with a Benchmark HPA4 pre-amp/headphone amp. Benchmark is headquartered in Syracuse, NY, not far from DreamScapes A/V’s showroom.
It was clearly a successful pairing as the speakers presented a punchy and dynamic representation of everything from jazz to classical to EDM. And that 25 Hz bass extension made itself known, not just in your ears, but deep in your gut with visceral impact.
Arendal 1610 Tower 8
A small town in Norway houses a speaker company with big ambitions: to make some of the finest loudspeakers on the planet. And while our experience with the brand is admittedly fairly limited, they certainly made some of the best-sounding speakers we heard at Axpona 2026. Arendal is a direct to consumer company, now selling in the U.S. market to audiophiles who want something different from the traditional mainstream speaker brands.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Advertisement
The Arendal 1610 Tower 8 ($7,600/pair) is the company’s latest flagship tower loudspeaker, but not their largest. It features 3-way design with 1″ aluminum-magnesium tweeter and triple 8″ aluminum cone bass drivers. In the demos we heard at Axpona, these substantial speakers managed to virtually disappear, providing a deep soundstage with instruments and voices floating disembodied in three dimensional space. Micro and macro dynamics were excellent with fine details in piano, guitar and violin presented naturally, while also being able to reproduce the deep thunderous kick of a bass drum or tympani in a symphony orchestra.
The company offers other more affordable models, including the Bookshelf 8 ($3,600/pair), Slim 8 ($2,800/pair), and Center 8 ($2,100 each). While there are no showrooms in which you can audition the Arendal speakers, the company does offer free shipping and a full 60-day audition period with free return shipping in the unlikely event that you decide not to keep them. The company also offers a generous 10-year warranty on their products so you can feel comfortable in your investment.
Paradigm Premier 820F V2
Walking from million dollar room to million dollar room, with some speaker systems alone selling for high six figures, it’s easy to get jaded at Axpona. That’s why walking into Paradigm’s room was such a revelation. The company’s new Premier Series 820F v2 tower loudspeaker offered up tight extended bass, precise imaging, and effortless reproduction of male and female vocals as well as excellent dynamic range on some pretty demanding music tracks. And their price was among the lowest we saw at the show. These elegant-looking tower loudspeakers sell for just $1,299/each ($2,598/pair). That leaves room in the budget for a nice integrated amp or A/V receiver to drive them.
The Premier Series feature trickle down technology from the company’s flagship Founder Series speakers which sell for up to $9,000/pair. This includes the company’s ALMAC (aluminum, ceramic, magnesium) concentric tweeter/midrange modules and ALMAG (aluminum magnesium) woofers. Company reps tell us the new towers can put out usable bass as low as 18 Hz, which is impressive for such an affordable speaker. If your needs are simpler (or your room is smaller), you can get into the Premier Series v2 starting at $798/pair for Premier 120B v2 bookshelf speaker. There are a total of six models in the new line-up including a new center channel speaker (Premier 620C v2) for $1,299, which features identical drivers to the 820F V2 tower but laid out differently for horizontal positioning. Home theater fans may want to check out the Premier 520LCR v2 (LCR Channel) which is priced at $899/each.
Paradigm’s Premier Series v2 speakers are expected to begin shipping in the United States in June, 2026.
Advertisement
Best Budget Subwoofer: SVS 3000 Micro R|Evolution
It wouldn’t be an audio show without something new from SVS, and for Axpona the latest entry was the company’s 3000 Micro R|Evolution powered subwoofer. We first saw this compact little dynamo at CES 2026, but now the company has officially launched the production version. Housed in a compact cube, measuring just 11 inches on each side, with dual opposing 9-inch drivers, SVS says the 3000 Micro can extend to 20 Hz. And the list price is just $999. This makes it the most affordable sub in the SVS line to feature trickle down power and processing tech from the company’s much larger (and much more expensive) flagship subwoofers.
SVS was showcasing the 3000 Micro with a pair of their smaller bookshelf speakers in the Ultra Evolution series, doing A/B comparisons with their flagship SVS Ultra Evolution Pinnacle tower speakers ($5,000/pair) to show just how close a bookshelf/subwoofer combo can come to a much larger, more expensive set of tower speakers for those with more limited space (and more limited budgets).
Loewe Stellar OLED TVs
I admit I have a bit of a soft spot for German TV maker Loewe as I owned one of their first HDTVs, a 38-inch 16:9 CRT TV which provided exceptional picture quality in its day (2002) and tipped the scales at over 200 pounds. With the demise of CRT and the rise of the flat panel, Loewe faded from the U.S. market, eventually filing for bankruptcy and insolvency. But in 2019, fresh investments brought the brand back from the brink with a revitalized operation, new factory in Germany and a whole new suite of products. Last year, the company announced their intention to return to the U.S market with both luxury TVs and headphones.
Built using the latest OLED panels from LG Display, and assembled by hand in Germany, Loewe has introduced a full line of OLED TVs sized from 42 to 97 inches. The sets support Dolby Vision HDR and Dolby Atmos sound with self-emissive OLED pixels providing outstanding contrast, color saturation and black levels. But Loewe’s TVs are more than just boring black rectangles that hang on your wall. They are built to be visible from all sides and feature luxury touches like motorized rotating stands that can give you the best picture performance from anywhere in your room, an elegant perfectly balanced aluminum remote with intuitive operation, and unique chassis design touches like lava-based concrete back plates on their models up to 65 inches. If you want your TV to look as good when it’s off as it does when it’s on, then Loewe’s new Stellar OLED TV line is worth a look.
Best Home Theater Sound: Theory Audio 9.2.4 Home Theater
As a CI (custom installation) brand, Theory Audio isn’t as well known as the standard consumer speaker brands, but they may be one of the best kept secrets of home theater and whole home audio. The company’s high-efficiency compression drivers are the standout feature of the lineup, delivering punchy, dynamic sound for both music and movies. The speakers are available in on-wall, in-wall, in-ceiling, and pendant designs. All models require the company’s Distributed Loudspeaker Controllers (DLCs), which provide power, EQ, and DSP to optimize performance.
We’d previously only seen and heard Theory Audio speakers at CEDIA and have been impressed with what we’ve heard. And now we know that the magic captured at CEDIA carries over to other environments as well, even in a tiny little hotel suite. Custom installation firm DreamScapes A/V installed a full 9.2.4-channel Theory Audio system that rocked the walls of the little hotel room suite they were installed in. Because drilling big holes in the walls and ceilings at a hotel is generally frowned upon, the company built a cage structure out of 2x4s to support all 13 speakers and tossed in a couple of powered subwoofers for good measure.
Driven by a Kaleidescape Strato E 4K movie player and Mini Terra Prime SSD hard drive loaded up with a few dozen 4K movies in Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos, the Theory Audio system sounded better than some premium movie theaters I’ve been in and superior to any other home theater speaker set-up we heard at the show.
Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Credit also goes to Dreamscapes A/V’s installation and engineering team. They managed to get the system installed, calibrated, and optimized to a very high level with less than a day to work with. If that’s what they can do in a hotel room, it raises expectations for what’s possible in a properly set up home.
Weirdest Looking Speaker System That Also Sounded Great: Fourier Sound
There were a whole lot of boring rectangular boxes at Axpona this year, but Fourier Sound’s Fourier Series 1 “Founders Edition” speaker system was anything but that. Featuring a tapering pyramid-like structure with horizontally mounted midrange drivers and front-firing tweeters, the Series 1 put out some of the most realistic sounding drum and percussion music I heard at the show, with outstanding dynamic punch and a wide expansive soundstage that filled the room. Vocals also came through cleanly and articulately in mellower singer/songwriter fare and the bass and synth notes of EDM tracks like “Alive” from Kx5/deadmau5 shook visitors to their core.
The system includes two multi-driver tower loudspeakers as well as the Fourier Foundation Bass Modules, which feature 8 separate bass drivers, delivering 4,000 total watts of power to the subwoofers.
The Fourier Founders System is priced at approximately $50,000 USD for the entire set. We don’t normally grant “best in show” awards to prototype systems (the Fourier Series 1 system is not yet in general production), but we felt that this system’s unique looks, innovative design and exceptional performance earned an exception. We hope the company managed to get some interest at Axpona to get these beauties into the hands of diehard music-lovers looking for something different from the usual black boxes.
Engagement is a big deal in the world of social media. On Wednesday, Meta announced Live Chats, a new feature for the Instagram-supported social app Threads. It adds a real-time conversation component, letting people connect during high-interest cultural events, such as playoff or championship games, or even the drop of a highly anticipated album.
Live Chats, the new public chat feature on Threads, launches in time for the NBA Playoffs.
Advertisement
Meta
Live Chats won’t be limited to sports, but the feature is launching during the NBA Playoffs within the NBAThreads Community, and an assortment of personalities — Malika Andrews, Rachel Nichols, Trysta Krick, David Rushing and Lexis Mickens — will host Live Chats as the games unfold.
The group chat experience includes countdowns, polls, live scores and other real-time options designed to keep the conversation active.
How to find Live Chats on Threads
Live Chats about the games will appear at the top of the NBAThreads Community, and they can also appear in your main feed on Threads if you follow a personality who has posted the link. A red circle will appear on a Live Chat host’s profile photo when they are live. More Community feeds will have the Live Chats feature in the coming months.
After you’ve entered the chat, you’ll be able to send and receive messages, attach photos, videos and links, and send reaction emoji. Anyone can join a chat, but it can reach capacity and stop accepting new users.
Advertisement
“Up to 150 participants can join in the Live Chat conversation (unless the host decides to make it invite only), but anyone can watch,” a Meta spokesperson told CNET. Once a Live Chat ends, it’ll no longer be pinned in the community feed, but will remain visible through previously shared posts.
How to start a Live Chat on Threads
Live Chats are open and public, but Meta allows only a select number of creators and personalities to host them on Threads. This includes Community Champions, who are active, influential users within a Threads community who stay engaged with others and keep conversations alive.
To schedule a Live Chat, a qualified host will tap the three-dot menu in the top-right corner and select “Schedule a Live Chat.” You can give the chat a name, select a time frame for it to be live and then invite other Threads users to join or post the link to your feed and Instagram Story to get the word out.
A bigger Live Chats experience is coming
Once Meta refines the feature, more Live Chat attributes will be rolling out in the near future, including co-hosting, play-by-play commentary content, lock screen widgets and a share option that’ll let you quote chat messages directly in your Threads feed.
Oppo has announced its flagship camera smartphone, the Find X9 Ultra, but how does it compare to Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max?
Although we haven’t specifically reviewed the Max model, we have reviewed the iPhone 17 Pro so we’ll draw on our experiences there whenever applicable.
Read on to see what’s the difference between the Oppo Find X9 Ultra and the iPhone 17 Pro Max, and to decide which handset will suit you best.
The Oppo Find X9 Ultra is the first of Oppo’s Ultra models to see a global launch. However, at the time of writing, we don’t have the exact pricing or release date for the UK.
Advertisement
In comparison, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is readily available to buy now and has a starting price of £1199/$1199. Considering the Oppo Find X9 Pro has a similar starting price of £1099, we expect this means the more premium Ultra will be more expensive than the iPhone 17 Pro Max – however that’s speculation at this point.
SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207953
Advertisement
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 vs A19 Pro
One of the biggest differences between the Find X9 Ultra and iPhone 17 Pro Max is with their respective chips. While the Find X9 Ultra runs on Qualcomm’s flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is powered by Apple’s own A19 Pro chip.
The iPhone 17 Pro also runs on Apple’s A19 Pro chip, and we found the handset offers brilliant performance across both day-to-day use and in our benchmark tests too. We also concluded the iPhone 17 Pro copes well with games too, although if that’s a necessity for your handset then you’ll be better off checking our best gaming phones guide instead.
Gaming on Find X9 Ultra. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Unsurprisingly, we found that the Oppo Find X9 Pro also offers a brilliant performance too. In fact, we especially found that the handset does a great job with ray-traced gaming too – something worth keeping in mind if you’d prefer not to opt for a gaming-specific handset. Not only that, but Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ensures everything runs smoothly and quickly too.
Advertisement
Oppo Find X9 Ultra has five rear cameras
Arguably the reason to choose the Oppo Find X9 Ultra is due to its mighty camera set-up. Created in collaboration with Hasselblad, the aptly titled Hasselblad Master Camera System is made up of five rear lenses, including dual Hasselblad 200MP main and 3x telephoto lens. In fact, the latter boasts the largest sensor of its kind and can be fitted with the 300mm Explorer Teleconverter that delivers a 300m focal length and 13x optical zoom too.
Advertisement
There are also two 50MP cameras which are flanked by a True Color Camera for natural colour rendition too.
In addition, the Find X9 Ultra is fitted with Oppo’s “most advanced cinematic capabilities to date”, and can not only deliver 4K60fps Dolby Vision HDR recording, but also captures 4K120fps via the Dual Hasselblad 200MP cameras too.
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
iPhone 17 Pro
Advertisement
Overall, we were blown away by the Find X9 Ultra’s photography capabilities, and concluded that its vibrant capture and multiple lenses “easily challenges Apple” for the best camera phone crown.
That’s not to say the iPhone 17 Pro Max is a slouch by any means, with its trio of rear lenses able to cope well with most lighting conditions and provide a brilliant detailed finish. While we haven’t reviewed the Pro Max, the iPhone 17 Pro has the same lenses on board and boasts the best zoom lens we’ve seen on an Apple flagship.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Oppo Find X9 Ultra supports faster charging
Like many of the best Android phones, the Find X9 Ultra supports exceptionally fast charging speeds – but only when paired with a compatible charger. So, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max supports 40W wired speeds and 25W MagSafe, the Find X9 Ultra boasts significantly faster numbers.
In fact, the Find X9 Ultra supports a whopping 100W SuperVOOC wired and 50W AirVOOC speeds. However, just keep in mind that you will need to purchase adapters separately to benefit from those speeds.
Oppo Find X9 Ultra in hand. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Oppo Find X9 Ultra has an IP66, IP68 and IP69 ratings
Durability is important when it comes to buying a phone and, fortunately, the Find X9 Ultra isn’t taking any chances. Not only does it sport the same IP68 rating as the iPhone 17 Pro Max, which means its dust-tight and can survive water submersion, but it also benefits from an IP66 and IP69 rating too. That means the handset can withstand high pressure and high temperature water jets too.
However, do keep in mind that the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s IP68 rating realistically offers more than enough protection for everyday use. Just think about how often your phone will really be subjected to water jets.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Oppo Find X9 Ultra has a 144Hz display
The 6.9-inch iPhone 17 Pro Max is fitted with Apple’s ProMotion technology, which means the panel has a LTPO-enabled 1-120Hz refresh rate that helps make animations, scrolling and gaming feel smooth. In comparison, the slightly smaller 6.82-inch Find X9 Ultra boasts up to a 144Hz refresh rate.
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
iPhone 17 Pro
Advertisement
Otherwise, the Find X9 Ultra is equipped with an AMOLED, QHD+ display that we found to be “impossible to fault”. Similarly, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is equipped with a Super Retina XDR (OLED), HDR display.
Early Verdict
Deciding between the Oppo Find X9 Ultra and iPhone 17 Pro Max will mainly boil down to two factors: whether you’re cemented in either the Android or iOS ecosystem and whether you want an especially versatile camera phone. While the iPhone 17 Pro Max is undoubtedly a versatile camera phone, the five rear lenses of the Find X9 Ultra and the optional teleconverter undoubtedly offer more flexibility.
Some people learning the noble art of electronics find the jump from simpler tools like Fritzing to more complex ones, such as KiCAD, a little daunting, especially since they need to learn at least two tools. Fritzing is great for visualising your breadboard layout, but what if you want to start from a proper schematic, make a prototype on a breadboard and then design a custom PCB? Well, with the Kicad-breadboard plugin for (you guessed it!) KiCAD, you can now do all of this in the same tool.
A simple dual-rail oscillator schematic corresponding to the featured image above
Originally designed to support EE students at the University of Antwerp, the tool presents you with a virtual breadboard with configurable size and style, along with a list of components and tools that can be placed. A few clicks and parts can be placed on the virtual breadboard with ease. Adding wires is the next logical step to make those connections that operate in the horizontal dimension. Finally, assigning power supplies and probe connections completes the process. It’s a simple enough tool to draw stuff, but drawing a layout is no use if you can’t verify it’s correctness. This is where this plugin shines: it can perform an ERC (check) between the schematic and the breadboard and flag up what you missed. Add to this that you can also perform an ERC at the schematic level, before even thinking about layout, and it’s pretty hard to make an error. Now, you can transfer this directly to a real breadboard, or even a veroboard, for more permanence once you have confidence in correctness. This will definitely save time correcting errors and help keep the magic smoke safely contained within those mysterious black rectangles.
As it stands, the tools are limited to a few select ICs, which, much to this scribe’s disappointment, did not include the venerable 555 timer; however, it would be possible to work around that with some imagination at the schematic level. The ability to drop in and document power supply, function generator, and oscilloscope probing points is nice, enabling one to close the loop on documenting a layout to make it truly transferable to physical reality.
We cover electronics prototyping with breadboards a lot because they’re accessible. Here’s a super simple computer on a breadboard. We also like seeing them integrated as tools, like here. Finally, why stick with the tired old common breadboard shapes when you could make your own?
The LincPlus LincStation E1 is a compact NAS that promises speed, capacity, and some smart features. Prosumers and above should skip this one, but for everyday users, it’s a pretty decent package.
LincPlus LincStation E1
A typical network-attached storage (NAS) device is, as the name implies, a bunch of drives in a purpose-made computer, optimized to serve files. There’s a big range that falls under that umbrella though, with many models able to provide services that rival a rack-mounted server. When it comes to making a NAS for a typical computer user rather than those with greater needs, things tighten up a bit. We’ve been fond of LincStation’s approach to that market. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
Audeze doesn’t need to reinvent itself every year to stay relevant, but it rarely stands still. At AXPONA 2026 in Chicago, the California headphone maker drew steady traffic in the Ear Gear section with a lineup that spans both audiophile and gaming use, anchored by its expanding use of SLAM technology across multiple models.
The booth stayed busy for a reason. Audeze is not chasing trends. It is refining its own approach, and listeners showed up to hear how that translates across a broader range of headphones rather than a single headline product.
At the top of the range, Audeze CRBN2 and Audeze LCD-5s were both on hand and available for extended listening. We’ve already given both models Editors’ Choice Awards, and neither required much debate to get there. They take different paths to a similar destination.
Audeze LCD-5s (left) and CRBN2 (right) at AXPONA 2026
The CRBN2 leans into a more forward presentation with added energy through the upper mids and lower treble, which gives it a sense of immediacy and openness that works well with detail-heavy material. The LCD-5s pulls things back slightly through the midrange, sounding more relaxed and a bit more natural over longer sessions without losing resolution.
Advertisement
Both now incorporate Audeze’s SLAM technology, which increases airflow and adds low-end weight without stepping on the rest of the frequency range. That matters. Electrostatic and planar designs have long carried a reputation for being light in the bass, and this feels like a direct response to that criticism. The added presence down low brings better balance without turning either headphone into something it isn’t.
I asked Karlee Little about a possible trade-up program for existing LCD-5 owners. The answer was polite but clear. Demand for current production is already high, and keeping up with orders is the priority. If anything like that happens, it won’t be anytime soon.
Custom Maxwell 2 Builds?
Audeze Maxwell 2
The Audeze Maxwell 2 was being demonstrated with both gaming systems and standard audio setups, and it rarely sat idle. The mix of listeners and gamers cycling through made it clear that Audeze understands where the volume is in today’s market.
I’ve had a pair on my desk for a few weeks, and the updates are not subtle. It builds on what was already one of the more compelling options at its price point with refinements that make it easier to recommend beyond just gaming use.
Audeze was also using the show to gather feedback on its new interchangeable faceplate concept, the reSkin program. Four gaming-inspired designs were on display, with more potentially on the way depending on response. Attendees were actively voting on which designs should come first, which is a smart way to avoid guessing wrong.
Advertisement
Audeze Maxwell 2 Headphones with interchangeable faceplates
For context, Editor in-Chief Ian White and Editor at-Large Chris Boylan were shown early sample cup covers at CanJam NYC 2026, but Audeze asked us to hold off on sharing details until the program was finalized. What we saw in Chicago looks more like a controlled rollout than an experiment.
A full custom upload option where users submit their own graphics would make this far more interesting. Whether Audeze wants to deal with that level of complexity is another question. For now, the four designs on display are the starting point.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
LCD-S20 Brings SLAM to the Studio
The fourth model incorporating SLAM is the Audeze LCD-S20, a closed-back design that Audeze had pulling double duty at AXPONA 2026. We were loaned four pairs for use at the podcast booth, and they were also available for demo on the show floor.
Advertisement
Audeze LCD-S20
In a space that was anything but quiet, the LCD-S20 proved its value quickly. Isolation was the standout. Even with a steady wall of background noise, voices came through cleanly without needing to crank levels or fight the environment. Our producer kept pushing us to get closer to the mic to cut through the noise, but the headphones were already doing most of that work.
This model slots into Audeze’s studio lineup alongside the Manny Marroquin series and LCD-X variants, offering a closed-back alternative at roughly the same price point as the open-back MM-100. That alone makes it worth paying attention to. There aren’t many options in this range that aim for a reference tuning while also addressing real-world recording conditions.
Build quality is another strong point. The LCD-S20 feels durable without becoming a burden during long sessions. There was even some joking about dropping a pair off a third-floor balcony, which the rep didn’t exactly discourage. We didn’t test that theory, but the reaction said enough. Audeze seems confident these will hold up under normal use, and then some.
The Bottom Line
Audeze doesn’t operate on a fixed script, and that’s part of the appeal. One minute it’s solving niche problems like medical applications, the next it’s refining products aimed at gamers and studio users.
Based on what was shown and discussed at AXPONA 2026, SLAM looks less like a feature and more like a direction. It’s already spreading across multiple models, and there are few obvious scenarios where added airflow and improved low-end balance would be a drawback.
Advertisement
Beyond that, the roadmap is exactly what you’d expect from Audeze. It depends on what users ask for and what the engineering team decides is worth chasing. So far, that combination has produced a wide range of headphones that don’t all sound the same and don’t all chase the same audience. That’s not an accident.
Sony knew exactly what it was buying when it acquired Audeze, and from what we’ve seen up close, there’s no sign they intend to interfere with that momentum. As long as models like the Maxwell 2 and its collaborative offshoots keep moving in serious volume, Audeze has the room to keep pushing headphone design forward. That’s where things get interesting.
The Department of Justice announced Thursday that it arrested Gannon Ken Van Dyke, an enlisted member of the US Army’s special forces, for allegedly using “classified, nonpublic” information about the capture of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro to notch more than $400,000 in profits on Polymarket trades. A grand jury indicted him on five counts, including multiple violations of the Commodity Exchange Act.
Van Dyke is the first person to be charged with insider trading on a prediction market in the United States. Lawmakers have been voicing concerns for months about the high likelihood that politicians and public servants could use nonpublic information to profit from trades on leading industry platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, which have exploded in popularity over the past year.
The arrest comes just weeks after Department of Justice prosecutors met with Polymarket about potential insider tradition violations. In February, Israeli authorities arrested two citizens, an Army reservist and a civilian, for allegedly leaking classified information by making wagers on Polymarket related to military operations. Kalshi, Polymarket’s primary rival in the United States, recently fined three politicians for breaking its insider trading rules, but it did not flag the violations for further enforcement to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal agency that oversees prediction markets.
After Van Dyke’s arrest was made public, Polymarket posted a statement to social media noting that it had “identified a user trading on classified government information” and “referred the matter to the DOJ & cooperated with their investigation.” The company declined to comment further.
Advertisement
According to court documents, Van Dyke has been an active duty US soldier since September 2008 and rose to the level of master sergeant in 2023. At the time of the alleged trading activity, he was stationed at Fort Bragg in Fayetteville, North Carolina and assigned to the Army’s Special Operations Command Western Hemisphere Operations.
“I have been crystal clear that anyone who engages in fraud, manipulation, or insider trading in any of our markets will face the full force of the law,” CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said in a statement. “The defendant was entrusted with confidential information about US operations and yet took action that endangered US national security and put the lives of American service members in harm’s way.”
The complaint alleges that Van Dyke was involved in the planning and execution of Maduro’s arrest and that he was aware that he wasn’t authorized to share nonpublic information about US military operations. The complaint says that Van Dyke signed a nondisclosure agreement that forbade him from revealing sensitive or classified government information “by writing, word, conduct, or otherwise.” The complaint also alleges Van Dyke saved a screenshot to his Google account “displaying the results of an artificial intelligence query” outlining how the US Special Forces maintains many classified files including “operational details that are not available to the public.”
On December 26, Van Dyke allegedly opened an account on Polymarket and took out around $35,000 from his bank account before transferring it to a cryptocurrency exchange.
Advertisement
The following day, Van Dyke allegedly made his first Venezuela-related trade on Polymarket, putting a little less than $100 on a “YES” contract that US forces would be in Venezuela by January 31, 2026. Prosecutors accuse him of ultimately making 13 Venezuela-related transactions on the platform in total, seven of those—totalling hundreds of thousands of shares—on a “YES” contract for “Maduro out by … January 31, 2026.” In other words, Van Dyke allegedly stood to make an enormous profit if the Venezuelan leader wound up out of power by the end of the month.
Google adds a few innovative features to the Pixel Watch 4 LTE, priced at $390 (was $450), that will significantly improve your everyday routine. When you put that aluminum case on your wrist, you’ll be impressed at how comfortable it feels, because the weight just balances out. Fast charging is also a lifesaver; half a charge in 15 minutes keeps your routines running smoothly even if you’re constantly on the go.
The display has actually grown larger, while the bezels around it have shrunk, allowing you to see even more details at a glance. The watch face curls up slightly under the glass, and it looks sharp regardless of where the light is coming from. It’s also rather bright, reaching up to 3,000 nits. Plus, the colors appear natural, and the text does not get blurry even when viewed in low light conditions.
Get 2yrs of data and texting included when you buy Pixel Watch 4 LTE[23]; Google Fi powers your messaging, navigation, and music on the go; offer only…
See it all and do the most with the Actua 360 domed display; it’s 10% larger and 50% brighter than Pixel Watch 3, and as durable as ever with…
The Google Pixel Watch 4 has Gemini built in[4]; just ask questions and your ultra capable AI assistant will deliver quick responses for personalized…
As far as battery life, you should be able to go all day and into the evening without having to stop and charge. The GPS is also much more accurate now, thanks to dual-frequency support, which allows it to carefully track your course even when you’re near buildings or trees. That means lap counts in the pool are much more accurate today, and you can finally stop guessing how fast you’re going. There is also a wide selection of activity kinds to measure, including various activities and even your heart rate. Sleep tracking is also quite handy, with clear summaries and recovery advice provided each morning to help you plan your day.
Advertisement
The watch’s UI is very quick to respond to taps and swipes, and with Gemini, you can ask it for information like the weather or directions directly from your wrist. It’s also much easier to receive alerts when they arrive, because the vibrations are strong enough to draw your attention and you don’t have to constantly examine the watch. Calls are much clearer, and on any Android phone, particularly a Pixel, you will receive notifications in real time.
This variant also supports LTE, so you can get online even if you don’t have your phone with you. This includes two years of free data and messaging with Google Fi. You can receive messages, maps, and even music directly to your wrist, eliminating the need to grab for your phone, and with all of the sensors on board, it can measure your heart rate and blood oxygen levels quite reliably. Satellite contact comes in handy during an emergency, allowing you to broadcast your location to someone.
X is making one of its biggest structural changes in years, and it’s not subtle. A core feature is getting shut down, but in its place, the platform is doubling down on AI-driven feeds and real-time chats.
Why is X shutting down Communities?
X has confirmed that it is closing its Communities feature, which originally launched as a way for users to gather around shared interests, similar to forums or subreddits. The reason is pretty blunt: low usage and high maintenance.
Today we’re announcing two product changes for organizing communities on X:
1. XChat now supports joinable links for groupchats. Create a public link & share direct to Timeline. With support for 350 members per chat (and growing), Groupchat Links are the fastest way to bring… pic.twitter.com/GNcRB99Opc
Despite the idea sounding great on paper, Communities were used by less than 0.4% of users, while also becoming a hotspot for spam, scams, and moderation headaches. 
In other words, it was a feature that demanded a lot of effort without delivering enough value. So X is cutting it loose.
What is replacing Communities on X?
Instead of Communities, X is splitting that experience into two very different directions: custom timelines powered by AI and expanded group chats.
Ladies and gentlemen, today we’re launching one of our biggest changes to 𝕏
Introducing Custom Timelines
Advertisement
This feature allows you to pin a specific topic to your home tab. With support for over 75 topics, you can dive deep into your favorite niche on X.
On one side, there are Custom Timelines, which let users pin topic-based feeds directly to their home screen. These feeds are powered by Grok, X’s AI system, which actually reads posts and categorizes them instead of relying on hashtags or keywords.
Advertisement
Unsplash
On the other side, X is pushing heavily into group chats via XChat. These chats now support joinable public links, making it easier to bring people into conversations instantly. Group sizes are also expanding, with limits expected to grow well beyond the current few hundred users.
What does this shift actually mean for users?
This is less about removing Communities and more about redefining them. Instead of fixed groups, users will now follow topics through AI-driven feeds or jump into real-time conversations via group chats, shifting away from slower, forum-style interactions.
It also signals a bigger strategy shift. X is betting on AI and messaging as the future, simplifying the experience while moving toward faster, more dynamic ways of connecting.
TerraPower is celebrating the start of construction on its nuclear plant in Kemmerer, Wyo. (TerraPower Photo)
TerraPower announced Thursday that it has started construction on its Natrium plant, making it the first company in the U.S. to break ground on an advanced nuclear power facility.
“This is the moment our industry has been working toward for a generation. We’re not just breaking new ground on a first-of-a-kind nuclear plant in Wyoming; we’re building the next generation of America’s energy infrastructure,” said Chris Levesque, CEO of TerraPower, in a statement.
The Bellevue, Wash.-based company began building its demonstration plant in Kemmerer, Wyo., in 2024, starting with construction of non-nuclear features. Last month, TerraPower received unanimous approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to proceed with the nuclear components.
The facility includes a 345-megawatt, sodium-cooled fast reactor paired with a system that holds excess heat inside of molten salt. Tapping the thermal salt battery can boost the plant’s power output to 500 megawatts for more than five hours. By comparison, Seattle uses around 2,000 megawatts during extreme weather events.
TerraPower aims to have the reactor splitting atoms by the end of 2030. Roughly 1,600 workers will be hired during construction, with approximately 250 full-time staff employed once the facility is operational.
Advertisement
The Wyoming plant was estimated in 2021 to cost about $4 billion; no updated figures have been provided. Levesque previously told GeekWire that private investments from Bill Gates and others as well as $2 billion federal grant mean “we’re building that project without burdening the ratepayers.”
The milestone comes as America’s nuclear sector has surged back to life after decades of stagnation, driven by tech giants scrambling to power data centers nationwide and rising energy demands across commercial, residential and industrial sectors.
Founded 20 years ago, TerraPower plans to build hundreds of its reactors, which are smaller and less costly than conventional facilities. Using prefabricated components, the company believes it can compress construction timelines to just three years — a fraction of the time required for traditional plants. The most recently completed conventional nuclear facility in the U.S. — the Plant Vogtle site in Georgia — took more than a decade to build.
TerraPower is already signing customers. In January, the company reached a deal with Meta to build up to eight Natrium reactors in the U.S. with the first two targeted to come online by 2032. If the full order is fulfilled, the additional reactors will be operating by 2035. The company also has memorandums of understanding with government agencies in Utah and Kansas to explore potential sites in those states.
Advertisement
“The start of construction on TerraPower’s Natrium plant in Kemmerer marks a major milestone not just for Wyoming, but for the future of American energy,” said Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon. “I want to thank everyone at TerraPower for their work getting to this day.”
The laptop is powered by a six-core CPU in a 2P+4LPE configuration, featuring two Cougar Cove P-cores and four Darkmont LPE cores. The SoC also includes two Xe graphics cores and a dedicated 17 TOPS NPU. Intel did not specify the exact CPU model, but it is believed to be… Read Entire Article Source link
You must be logged in to post a comment Login